JOAN B. SILK Department of Anthropology Emory University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JOAN B. SILK Department of Anthropology Emory University 122 BOOK REVIEWS Although Gray’s coverage of primate socio- here. Moreover, they are discussed with con- biology is impressive, it is not exhaustive. In siderable accuracy. Primate Sociobiology also general, the papers cited in this volume are contains a very comprehensive review of so- those that explicitly mention sociobiological ciobiological analyses of the behavior of con- predictions. Given the wide-ranging scope of temporary humans. Gray has done us a his efforts, this was probably a necessary con- considerable service by compiling studies straint. However, it is sometimes unfortu- published in anthropology, psychology, and nate because relevant studies that were sociology. conducted within different theoretical frame- Gray’s book is a valuable resource for pri- works are thereby neglected. A more thor- matologists. My copy is already well- ough and insightful analysis of the factors thumbed, annotated, and frequently con- that influence maternal investment pat- sulted. The empirical data provided here pro- terns, for example, would draw more exten- vide ample ammunition for new skirmishes sively upon the detailed studies of mother- between supporters and opponents of socio- infant relationships conducted by Robert biology. With Gray’s book, there is reason to Hinde, Leonard Rosenblum, Carol Berman, hope, however, that the issues will become and many others. However, in other areas more substantive, and the debates will be- this problem does not arise. For example, come more productive. most studies of the relationship between fe- male dominance rank and reproductive suc- JOANB. SILK cess were conducted with sociobiological Department of Anthropology questions in mind, and all of the relevant Emory University studies of which I am aware are reviewed Atlanta, Georgia PALAEOANTHROPOLOGY AND PALAEOLITHIC erly credits the redating of Yuanmou, with ARCHAEOLOGYIN THE PEOPLESREPUBLIC implications that are important because 1) OF CHINA.Edited by Wu Rukang and John the incisors from the site are the earliest W. Olsen. Orlando: Academic Press. 1985. known from China and the redating halves xxvii + 293 pp., figures, tables, index. their age, and 2) other faunal dates such as $54.00 (cloth). those of the Gigantopithecus caves in south China depend on the Yuanmou age. As with other chapters in this volume, it is critical to A combination of broad coverage and excel- read the text as well as the tables to reach a lent translation makes this one of the most full understanding of what is being pre- useful compilations of Chinese paleoanthro- sented. Dates presented for Zhoukoudian and pology and Paleolithic archaeology ever pub- Xujiayao are also absolutely critical as con- lished. By covering a number of recent text for understanding human evolution in discoveries and developing ideas about hu- China. man evolution in China as seen through the Following these introductory chapters eyes of the top scholars in the People’s Re- there are two reviews of the thick enameled public, the sources for so many ideas that hominoids by Wu Rukang and Xu Qinghua have come into the Western literature by and by Zhang Yinyun. The former deals with various means can now be properly credited. the fossil apes from Lufeng, Ramapithecus The “Paleoanthropology” section (perhaps and Sivapithecus, which are regarded as more properly a “biological anthropology” either two sexes or two closely related spe- section since Paleolithic archaeology is often cies. The latter reviews the relation of early included within paleoanthropology) begins and late Gigantopithecus remains and attri- with a review of paleoanthropological (broad butes the so-called A ustralopithecus speci- meaning) research in China by Wu Rukang mens to an early form of Homo erectus. The and Lin Shenglong, including an extraordi- remains of Homo erectus discovered since lib- narily useful bibliography. This chapter is eration are briefly discussed by Wu Rukang followed by a brief review of chronology, as it and Dong Xingren and include some (but not is currently understood, by Wu Xinzhi and enough) commentary on the Hexian vault Wang Linghong. This review includes the and an unfortunately weak description of latest radiometric determinations and prop- dental remains from Longgudong and Bai- BOOK REVIEWS 123 longdong. Only Longgudong is published in mou, which makes it younger than the Lower any detail elsewhere in the Chinese litera- Pleistocene materials from Xihoudu. Zhang ture, leaving aspects of dental evolution in Senshui, who like Jia has extensive experi- China unknown in the West. ence at many of the archaeological sites, pre- Early (archaic) Homo sapiens is discussed sents a long and very useful chapter on the in a chapter by Wu Xinzhi and Wu Maolin, early Paleolithic. Chapters on the middle while more recent remains are covered by (Qiu Zhonglang) and late (Jia Lanpo and Wu Xinzhi and Zhang Zhenbiao. The archaic Huang Weiwen) Paleolithic tend to be pri- remains are seen as precursors for the living marily descriptive and site oriented, al- and recent Chinese populations (see, espe- though like all the chapters in this cially, the discussion of Dali), and as distinct compilation they include more discussion and from early Homo sapiens in other areas of interpretation than is usual in that part of the world, thus carrying on Weidenreich’s the Chinese scientific literature available in traditional interpretation of human evolu- English. More specialized chapters describe tion in the Far East. Moreover, the virtually microlithic industries (Gai Pei), the Paleo- complete skeleton from Yingkou, discovered pithic of Inner Mongolia (Wang Yuping and after the Wu and Wu chapter was written, J.W. Olsen), and the mammalian faunas of adds even more fuel to the regional continu- China (Han Defen and Xu Chunhua). Fi- ity argument. nally, Jia Lanpo and Huang Weiwen place The more recent remains (a sample now the understanding of China’s Paleolithic in a much larger than the Zhoukoudian Upper historic context. Cave materials) are shown to fit this scheme This book is an absolute must for anybody far better than Weidenreich thought. More- interested in the course of human evolution over, evolutionary trends within the large in East Asia. Indeed, given some of the re- Neolithic samples are shown, and it is clear cent publications asserting that Chinese that research in all aspects of human evolu- Homo erectus has nothing to do with the evo- tion is proceeding at the fastest rate one could lution of later humans and the use of these expect when the number of times the same publications by geneticists claiming to show name appears on different papers (an indica- a recent replacement of all human popula- tor of the small number of Chinese paleoan- tions by a very small population from Africa, thropologists) is taken into account. this book could well be required reading for The second half of the book, almost exactly everybody interested in the origins of mod- half by page count, reviews the progress and ern populations. The East Asian fossil evi- prospects for Paleolithic archaeology in dence should be understood, and the un- China. The authors, perhaps less familiar to interpreted opinions of our Chinese col- the readers of this journal, also occupy the leagues at the IVPP read first hand, so that fourth floor of the IVPP in Beijing (Zhou these can be considered in an accurate and Mingzhen once pointed out to me that the valid way. This book provides the opportu- institute reflected the evolutionary process, nity to do so. It will no doubt foster a better with the invertebrate paleontologists below understanding of Chinese paleoanthropology the vertebrate paleontologists, who in turn than currently exists. are below the paleoanthropologists). The archaeological sequence is discussed in MILFORDH. WOLPOFF serial order, perhaps reflecting chronology. Department of Anthropology Jia Lanpo describes the earliest Paleolithic The University of Michigan remains, supporting the redating of Yuan- Ann Arbor, Michigan METRICAND NON-METRICCRANIAL VARIA- The biological variation within Australian TION IN AUSTRALIANABORIGINAL POPULA- Aboriginal populations, the presumed Asian TIONS COMPARED WITH POPULATIONS FROM origin of the founding population, and the THE PACIFIC AND ASIA. By M. Pietrusewsky. presence of temporal trends within Australia Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute are the subjects of protracted debate. Despite of Aboriginal Studies. 1984. xi + 113 pp., an increased effort in the last two decades, maps, figures, tables, references. $9.95 this debate is after 200 years of research still (paper). some distance from resolution. Pietrusewsky .
Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Hobsbawm 1990, 66. 2. Diamond 1998, 322–33. 3. Fairbank 1992, 44–45. 4. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1–2. 5. Diamond 1998, 323, original emphasis. 6. Crossley 1999; Di Cosmo 1998; Purdue 2005a; Lavely and Wong 1998, 717. 7. Richards 2003, 112–47; Lattimore 1937; Pan Chia-lin and Taeuber 1952. 8. My usage of the term “geo-body” follows Thongchai 1994. 9. B. Anderson 1991, 86. 10. Purdue 2001, 304. 11. Dreyer 2006, 279–80; Fei Xiaotong 1981, 23–25. 12. Jiang Ping 1994, 16. 13. Morris-Suzuki 1998, 4; Duara 2003; Handler 1988, 6–9. 14. Duara 1995; Duara 2003. 15. Turner 1962, 3. 16. Adelman and Aron 1999, 816. 17. M. Anderson 1996, 4, Anderson’s italics. 18. Fitzgerald 1996a: 136. 19. Ibid., 107. 20. Tsu Jing 2005. 21. R. Wong 2006, 95. 22. Chatterjee (1986) was the first to theorize colonial nationalism as a “derivative discourse” of Western Orientalism. 23. Gladney 1994, 92–95; Harrell 1995a; Schein 2000. 24. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1. 25. Cohen 1991, 114–25; Schwarcz 1986; Tu Wei-ming 1994. 26. Harrison 2000, 240–43, 83–85; Harrison 2001. 27. Harrison 2000, 83–85; Cohen 1991, 126. 186 • Notes 28. Duara 2003, 9–40. 29. See, for example, Lattimore 1940 and 1962; Forbes 1986; Goldstein 1989; Benson 1990; Lipman 1998; Millward 1998; Purdue 2005a; Mitter 2000; Atwood 2002; Tighe 2005; Reardon-Anderson 2005; Giersch 2006; Crossley, Siu, and Sutton 2006; Gladney 1991, 1994, and 1996; Harrell 1995a and 2001; Brown 1996 and 2004; Cheung Siu-woo 1995 and 2003; Schein 2000; Kulp 2000; Bulag 2002 and 2006; Rossabi 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Paleolithic of China1) HUANG Weiwen2)
    第 四 紀 研 究 (The Quaternary Research) 28 (4) p. 237-242 Nov. 1989 The Early Paleolithic of China1) HUANG Weiwen2) spread widely and existed for a long time. The Introduction deposits contained very rich fossils of mammal. 1. Geographic Distribution and the Types of The fauna exisiting in the stage from the early Deposits to the middle Pleistocene can be at least divided Before the 1940's, only one locality of the into three groups, which have their own Early Paleolithic period was discovered in characteristics and sequence: Nihewan fauna of China. That is Zhoukoudian near Beijing early Pleistocene, Gongwangling (Lantian Man) City (the site of Peking Man). Since the 1950's fauna of the latest stage of early Pleistocene many new localities have been found, of which or the earliest stage of middle Pleistocene and no less than fifteen are relatively important. Zhoukoudian (Peking Man) fauna of the middle These localities spread in North, South and Pleistocene. In the recent years, some scholars Northeast China covering a range from 23°35' to have suggested that locations of Dali and 40°15'N and from 101°58' to 124°8'E which Dingcun which originally recognized as be- includes two climate zones, namely, the sub- longing to the early stage of late Pleistocene tropical zone and warm temperate zone in the should place in the middle Pleistocene, as the eastern part of today's Asia (Fig. 1). latest stage of this epoch (LIU and DING,1984). The localities include three types of deposit: There also existed fluviatile and fluviol- 1) Fluviatile deposit: acustrine deposits of Pleistocene in South Xihoudu (Shanxi), Kehe (Shanxi), Lantian China.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the History of the Yi, Part II
    MODERNHarrell, Li CHINA/ HISTORY / JULY OF 2003THE YI, PART II REVIEW10.1177/0097700403253359 Review Essay The History of the History of the Yi, Part II STEVAN HARRELL LI YONGXIANG University of Washington MINORITY ETHNIC CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE 1980S AND 1990S The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is, according to its constitution, “a unified country of diverse nationalities” (tongyide duominzu guojia; see Wang Guodong, 1982: 9). The degree to which this admirable political ideal has actually been respected has varied throughout the history of the PRC: taken seriously in the early and mid-1950s, it was systematically ignored dur- ing the twenty years of High Socialism from the late 1950s to the early 1980s and then revived again with the Opening and Reform policies of the past two decades (Heberer, 1989: 23-29). The presence of minority “autonomous” ter- ritories, preferential policies in school admissions, and birth quotas (Sautman, 1998) and the extraordinary emphasis on developing “socialist” versions of minority visual and performing arts (Litzinger, 2000; Schein, 2000; Oakes, 1998) all testify to serious attention to multinationalism in the cultural and administrative realms, even if minority culture is promoted in a homogenized socialist version and even if everybody knows that “autono- mous” territories are far less autonomous, for example, than an American state or a Swiss canton. But although the party state now preaches multinationalism and allows limited expression of ethnonational autonomy, it also preaches and promotes progress—and thus runs straight into a paradox: progress is defined in objectivist, modernist terms, which relegate minority cultures to a more MODERN CHINA, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliografía – Riferimenti Bibliografici
    STUDII BIOLOGIE 14, 2009.pdf, Flat 4 of 64 - Pages: 6, 7, 01/27/10 06:19 PM 6 Studii şi cercetări, BiologyRhinocerotoidea 14, Bistriţ a,Gill, p. 7-1041872, Bibliography of selected papers... 7 Berkesy Lásló, Berkesy Corina RHINOCEROTOIDEA GILL, 1872 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SELECTED PAPERS – BIBLIOGRAFYA RÉFÉRENCES BIBLIOGRAPHIQUES – BIBLIOGRAFÍA – RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI Emmanuel M.E. BILLIA* For a more rapid and easy consultation a list of bibliographic references concerning the Rhinocerotoidea Superfamily is proposed. As far as regards to the reference codes included in column on the left see the “Legenda” table. Il nous a paru utile, afin d’assurer une consultation du texte à la fois plus rapide et plus aisée, de proposer ici-même des références bibliographiques concernant la Super-famille Rhinocerotoidea. Pour ce qui a trait au choix des références placées dans la liste de gauche, voir la table des “Legenda”. Para una mas rápida y fácil consultación, se propone aquì una lista bibliográfica sobre la Superfamilia Rhinocerotoidea. Por lo que concerne las claves de referimiento de la columna a la izquierda, veer la tabla ”Legenda”. Dlya bolee bystroy i udobnoy konsul’tazii privoditsya spisok bibliografii nadsemeystva Rhinocerotoidea. Chto kasaetsya kodov, privedennyh v kolonke sleva, smotrite tablizu “Legenda”. Ai fini di una più rapida e agevole consultazione, si è ritenuto utile proporre un elenco di riferimenti bibliografici relativi alla Superfamiglia Rhinocerotoidea. Per quanto concerne i codici di riferimento riportati nella colonna a sinistra, si consulti il quadro ”Legenda”. LEGENDA 1a Rhinocerotidae of the European Paleocene-Eocene 1b Rhinocerotidae of the European Oligo-Miocene 1c Rhinocerotidae of the European Pliocene 2 Rhinocerotidae of the European Pleistocene in general or indet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioarcheology of China
    Chapter 3 Bioarchaeology of China: Bridging Biological and Archaeological Inquiries Elizabeth Berger and Kate Pechenkina In China, anthropology (人类学 renleixue, literally “study of humanity”) is primar- ily used to refer to physical anthropology. Biological or physical anthropology is firmly situated within the biological disciplines, whereas archaeology is tradition- ally hosted by history departments. Consequent differences in research interests and approaches between archaeologists and biological anthropologists have influenced the development of the field. Research on archaeological human skeletons, and anthropology as a whole, in China can be divided into three historical phases: (1) the late 1800s to 1949, the formative period, when anthropology in China was practiced as a holistic discipline and biological anthropology research was dominated by comparative morphomet- rics, population history, and paleoanthropology; (2) 1949 to the early 1980s, when “anthropology” referred almost exclusively to physical anthropology, and morpho- metrics and paleoanthropology were independent of archaeology; and (3) the 1980s until today, when cultural anthropology has experienced a renewal and bioarchaeol- ogy has come to integrate the skeletal and archaeological records (Zhang 2012; Zhu 2004; Hu 2006; Guldin 1994). In its early years (before 1949), Chinese anthropology was in close communica- tion with American, British, and European scholarship. However, it also draws from a long tradition of Chinese historiography, antiquarianism, and medical stud- ies and has undergone more than 100 years of development within China to become a discipline with its own research foci and disciplinary boundaries (Guldin 1994; Hu 2006). E. Berger Lieberthal-Rogel Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA e-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • AMNH Digital Library
    fA I J"' .;^i>H..;--^ :.^..*j*^'' --^^^Jjj^ (i by ihe Roger Ricfimonrt AgHnf//, vww,wri[jhI9 THE GREATEST RISK IS NOT TAKING ONE. It takes courage to do something ttiat's never been done before. To attempt a feat tfiat goes beyond conventional thinking. But, it also takes planning and a complete understanding of all the problems that may arise. No one has better firsthand knowledge of the inherent risks of dahng enterphses than we do. In fact, we're the leading U.S.-based provider of custom-tailored risk solutions for companies all over the world. So the next time you wake up, mind ablaze with an idea that nobody's attempted to pursue before, contact AIG. We're the organization that helps challenging ventures get off the ground. ,.«*^ •->j» ^ ^ WORLD LEADERS IN INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES AIG Insurance and services provided by members of American International % Group, Inc.. 70 Pine Street, Department A, New York, New York 10270. WWW.AIG.COM ''"^IBe LDS^'1-\)\ID^& ICOMES BA % BIGGER THAN YOUR IM AGIIM ATIOISI Dpioueri Pjvf •.' v<4i&{-i « Sunday March 11, 8pm e/p discovery.com MARCH 2001 VOLUME 110 NUMBER 2 F_E^ U R^ S MUSHI For youngsters in Japan, the study of insects has been both a tad and a tradition. BY ERIK L. LAURENT THE SCAVENGING OF "PEKING MAN" What was tiic hunter and who the vicdni? BY NOEL T. BOAZ AND RUSSELL L. CIOCHON A WORLD APART The ocean's invertebrate animals may THE AFTERSHOCKS THAT assume myriad WEREN'T fantastic forms A 1992 quake in the Mojave Desert before reaching upset some settled seismological notions.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Asia
    39 World Heritage papers39 World Heritage papers HEADWORLD HERITAGES 3 Human origin sites and the Human origin sites and the Heritage World in Asia Convention World Heritage Convention in Asia For more information contact: UNESCO World Heritage Centre papers 7, place Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel: 33 (0)1 45 68 24 96 Fax: 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail: [email protected] http://whc.unesco.org World HeritageWorld Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Asia Nuria Sanz, Editor Coordinator of the World Heritage/HEADS Programme Published in 2014 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2014 ISBN 978-92-3-100043-0 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[On-Going] (Bulk 1970-1995)
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt7r29q3gq No online items Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[on-going] (bulk 1970-1995) Processed by Jean Jao-Jin Kao, Yu Li, Janice Otani, Limin Fu, Yen Chen, Joy Hung, Lin Lin Ma, Zhuqing Xia and Mabel Yang The Ethnic Studies Library. 30 Stephens Hall #2360 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-2360 Phone: (510) 643-1234 Fax: (510) 643-8433 Email: [email protected] URL: http://eslibrary.berkeley.edu © 2003 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai AAS ARC 2000/80 1 Papers, 1778-[on-going] (bulk 1970-1995) Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[on-going] (bulk 1970-1995) Collection number: AAS ARC 2000/80 The Ethnic Studies Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Ethnic Studies Library. 30 Stephens Hall #2360 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-2360 Phone: (510) 643-1234 Fax: (510) 643-8433 Email: [email protected] URL: http://eslibrary.berkeley.edu/ Collection Processed By: Jean Jao-Jin Kao, Yu Li, Janice Otani, Limin Fu, Yen Chen, Joy Hung, Lin Lin Ma, Zhuqing Xia and Mabel Yang Date Completed: May 2003 Finding Aid written by: Jean Jao-Jin Kao, Janice Otani and Wei Chi Poon © 2003 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Him Mark Lai Papers, Date: 1778-[on-going] Date (bulk): (bulk 1970-1995) Collection number: AAS ARC 2000/80 Creator: Lai, H. Mark Extent: 130 Cartons, 61 Boxes, 7 Oversize Folders199.4 linear feet Repository: University of California, BerkeleyThe Ethnic Studies Library Berkeley, California 94720-2360 Abstract: The Him Mark Lai Papers are divided into four series: Research Files, Professional Activities, Writings, and Personal Papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoth and Other Proboscideans in China During the Late Pleistocene
    Tong Haowen1 & M. Patou-Mathis2 1 Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing 2 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris Mammoth and other proboscideans in China during the Late Pleistocene Tong, Haowen & Patou-Mathis, M., 2003 - Mammoth and other proboscideans in China during the Late Pleistocene - in: Reumer, J.W.F., De Vos, J. & Mol, D. (eds.) - ADVANCES IN MAMMOTH RESEARCH (Proceedings of the Second International Mammoth Conference, Rotterdam, May 16-20 1999) - DEINSEA 9: 421-428 [ISSN 0923-9308] Published 24 May 2003 In China during the Late Pleistocene four genera of proboscideans (Mammuthus, Stegodon, Elephas and Palaeoloxodon), containing six species, were present. Mammuthus primigenius is the most verified species, because of its easily identified tooth morphology. Stegodon orientalis is also a species widely accepted and easily to recognise. However, the presence of Palaeoloxodon naumanni (Palaeoloxodon can be considered as an independent genus or as a subgenus of Elephas) is open to question, because its distinction from Elephas maximus is not remarkable. Chronologically, mammoth had a very short history in China. It lived during the time span between 34.000 - 11.800 yBP. Stegodon originated in China at the beginning of the Pliocene. Its ‘golden age’ was the Middle and Late Pleistocene; it even survived into the Holocene (5.000 yBP). Elephas immigrated into China in the Late Pliocene; its loca- lities were widely distributed in China during the Pleistocene. This genus too survived into the Holocene. More than ten Holocene localities have been reported. Today there still is a small herd of Elephas near the southwestern border of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[On-Going] (Bulk 1970- 1995)
    Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[on-going] (bulk 1970- 1995) Collection Number AAS ARC 2000/80 ETHNIC STUDIES LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY © 2004 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Table Of Contents Descriptive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. i Administrative Information ..................................................................................................................................................... iii Related Collections ................................................................................................................................................................... iv Biographical Information ......................................................................................................................................................... v Scope and Content of Collection ............................................................................................................................................. vi Series Description ................................................................................................................................................................... viii SERIES 1: RESEARCH FILES, 1778-2002, n.d.......................................................................................................... viii A.: General Subjects, 1778-2002, n.d. ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoanthropology and Anthropology in the Chinese Frontier, 1920-1950
    Constructing the Chinese: Paleoanthropology and Anthropology in the Chinese Frontier, 1920-1950 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Yen, Hsiao-pei. 2012. Constructing the Chinese: Paleoanthropology and Anthropology in the Chinese Frontier, 1920-1950. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10086027 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Copyright ©2012 by Hsiao-pei Yen All rights reserved To My Parents Advisor: Professor Henrietta Harrison Hsiao-pei Yen Constructing the Chinese: Paleoanthropology and Anthropology in the Chinese Frontier, 1920-1950 ABSTRACT Today’s Chinese ethno-nationalism exploits nativist ancestral claims back to antiquity to legitimize its geo-political occupation of the entire territory of modern China, which includes areas where many non-Han people live. It also insists on the inseparability of the non-Han nationalities as an integrated part of Zhonghua minzu. This dissertation traces the origin of this nationalism to the two major waves of scientific investigation in the fields of paleoanthropology and anthropology in the Chinese frontier during the first half of the twentieth century. Prevailing theories and discoveries in the two scientific disciplines inspired the ways in which the Chinese intellectuals constructed their national identity. The first wave concerns the international quest for human ancestors in North China and the northwestern frontier in the 1920s and 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to Jia Lanpo (1908-2001)
    A Tribute to Jia Lanpo (1908-2001) JOHN W. OLSEN BORN DURING THE TWILIGHT YEARS OF CHINA'S LAST IMPERIAL DYNASTY, Jia Lanpo was known nearly universally to his Chinese-speaking colleagues and students as Jia Lao, a referent of supreme respect that may be translated roughly as Elder Jia. In the traditional Chinese worldview-still very much central to the ways in which ethnic Chinese reckon social relationships, irrespective of their national origins-one accumulates wisdom and, consequently, reverence with advancing years. In middle age, Jia Lanpo had become a scholar and mentor of such universal respect that the more common age-based honorific, Lao Jia (Older Jia), and the equally formal, though less adulatory, forms of address-Jia Jiaoshou (Professor Jia) and Jia Laoshi (Teacher Jia)-were no longer often used in refer­ ence to this truly extraordinary man. By the beginning of his tenth decade, Jia Lanpo was lauded for his scholarly accomplishments and leadership qualities by scores of Chinese and foreign scientists alike (e.g., Clark 2002:261-263; Wei 1999; Wen 1999). Assessing the significance of Jia Lanpo's scientific research in China and its impact on global paleoanthropology is no simple task. As Dennis Etler has so correctly observed in his definitive obituary, Jia Lanpo " ... was an indefatigable worker and meticulous scholar, the author of hundreds of scientific and popular articles, treatises, and books detailing archaeological discoveries in China spanning over six decades" (Etler 2002: 297). Understanding Jia and his contributions requires contextualization on several historical and social levels. Many Western scholars assume that Chinese academics of Jia's generation labored solely under restrictive intellectual paradigms ranging from virtual foreign domination in the years prior to 1949 to hard-line Marxism­ Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought during and immediately after the repressive decade known as the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (1966-1976).
    [Show full text]