Air Force Science and Technology Contributions to the Nation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air Force Science and Technology Contributions to the Nation The Limitless Sky Air Force Science and Technology Contributions to the Nation Edited by: Alexander H. Levis Chief Scientist, USAF with the assistance of Colonel John C. Bedford, USAF, Ret. Captain Sandra Davis Air Force History and Museums Program United States Air Force Washington, D.C. 2004 “…problems never have a final or universal answer, and only constant inquisitive attitude towards science and a ceaseless and swift adaptation to new development can maintain the security of this nation through… air supremacy” Dr. Theodore onv Kármán to General Henry H. “Hap” Arnold 15 December 1945 To the Air Force scientists and engineers, military and civilian, for keeping true to von Kármán’s vision. Acknowledgement Neither the Symposium nor this book would have been possible without the support of a number of organizations. The Air Force Association provided a venue for the Symposium and made it a part of its Fall ’03 convention in Washington, D.C. The Air Force Legislative Liaison and the Public Affairs Offices provided administrative support and publicity, while the Centennial of Flight Office included this activity in the centennial program. The organizing committee was chaired by Col. John B. Bedford, AF/ST, and included Alexander G. Levis and Nancy C. Stenger from AF/ST, Bill Heimdahl from AF/HO, Col. Tom Schubert from AF/LL, Maj. Michelle Ryan, AF/CVAH, and Napoleon Byars from AFA. The Program Committee had the responsibility of selecting the topics and working with the multiple authors to produce the papers and the presentations. The committee was chaired by Alexander H. Levis, AF/ST, and included Barbara A. Wilson, AFRL/CT, Col. Donald R. Erbschloe, AFOSR/CD, George W. Bradley III, AFSC/HO, Ruth P. Liebowitz, ESC/HO, and Maj. John Beaulieu, AF/HO. Thanks are also due to several individuals who introduced the papers at the Symposium: LtGen Tom Hobbins, AF/XI, Maj Gen Don Lamberson (Ret.), Barbara Wittig, Jacob Neufeld, and Richard Wolfe, of AF/HO for editorial assistance and Susan Linders, of Air Force Media Services for design and layout. Content Dedication iii Acknowledgment iv The Limitless Sky 1 Dr. Alexander H. Levis Precision Timing, Location, Navigation: GPS and the Precision Revolution 23 Michael I. Yarymovych, Bradford W. Parkinson, George W. Bradley III, Brigadier General Daniel J. Darnell, USAF, Ivan A. Getting Tightening the Circle: Scientific Research and the Evolution and Revolution of Precision Guided Munitions 21 Lieutenant General Daniel P. Leaf, USAF, Robert I. Sierakowski, Robert P. White Enlisting the Spectrum for Air Force Advantage: Electro-Optical/Infrared (EO/IR) 47 Ruth P. Liebowitz, Edward A. Watson, Major General Stephen G. Wood, USAF From the Air: Taking Radar to New Heights 65 Tom W. Thompson, Ruth P. Liebowitz, Jon S. Jones, Robert J. Mailloux, Lieutenant General Bruce K. Brown, USAF, Ret., Major General Joseph P. Stein, USAF Pilots in Extreme Environments: Enforcing U.S. Foreign Policy from the Edge of Space 83 Major General Robert F. Behler, USAF, Ret, Russell R. Burton, George C. Mohr, William J. Sears, Billy E. Welch Exploiting the High Ground: The U.S. Air Force and the Space Environment 109 Barron K. Oder, William F. Denig, Major William B. Cade III, USAF Space Flight: Long-Range Missiles, Rocket Planes, and Lifting Bodies 145 Rick W. Sturdevant, John H. Darrah, Lieutenant General Forrest McCartney, USAF, Ret. Military Satellite Communications: From Concept to Reality 171 Harry L. Van Trees, Lieutenant General Harry D. Raduege, USAF, Rick W. Sturdevant, Ronald E. Thompson Directed Energy: The Wave of the Future 207 Robert W. Duffner, Robert R. Butts, J. Douglas Beason, General Ronald R. Fogleman, USAF, Ret. Notes and References 233 Acronyms 254 Biographical Sketches of Authors 258 Introduction The Limitless Sky The old dream of mankind to fly and reach the sky—as exemplified by Daedalus and Icarus of ancient Greek lore—became a reality on December 17, 1903, at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, and ushered in a period of unprecedented technological development. From Orville Wright’s short flight a few feet off the ground, to the commercial airliners flying at 37,000 feet, the limits of the sky have receded farther and farther away. In the second half of the twentieth century, powered flight extended to satellites orbiting the earth, to landings on the moon, and probes that explore our planetary system. The Hubble space telescope has been producing breathtaking pictures of distant galaxies not observable from terrestrial telescopes. The sky has become limitless. The Air Force, from its very beginnings as the Army Air Corps, has contributed significantly to all aspects of powered flight that have not only enhanced the defense capabilities of the United States, but also produced a broad spectrum of non-military applications that have improved the quality of life throughout the world. Consequently, to celebrate the centennial of flight, a one-day symposium was held on September 17, 2003, in which the stories of some of the contributions, and of the people who made them, were told. The objective of the symposium was to present technological developments that have produced new capabilities or opened new ways for achieving objectives. Each paper is the result of a collaborative effort of historians, who have placed the contribution in its historical perspective; technologists, who have described the essence of the scientific or technological contribution; and Air Force senior officers, who have shared their personal experiences on how that technological development affected operations or missions. The nine papers included in this volume were selected because of their diversity and because they illustrate clearly several key themes. First, it takes a long time from the onset of a new idea to the production of a useful product that enhances operations, something on the order of twenty years. One has to believe in the idea and stay the course, in the face of adversity, to obtain results. Consistent, steady funding is a must. Second, research results rarely lead to what was envisioned in the beginning as a relevant application. Indeed, research in atomic clocks enabled the Global Positioning System (GPS), but that was not the motivation for the research. Similarly, early research on lasers hardly anticipated the proliferation of commercial products or at-home entertainment via DVDs. Third, it usually takes a confluence of several disparate developments to produce a new capability. A vibrant, interacting scientific and engineering community is essential to achieve the breakthroughs that will continue to provide the nation with air supremacy. 1 The Limitless Sky The first paper tells the story of GPS. It is not only a story of scientific and technical achievement, but also one of suspense that illustrates the difficulties of introducing revolutionary technologies. The failures and successes in that program attest to the vision and perseverance of the people who made it happen. The GPS finally solved the problem that had challenged seafarers since antiquity. It has also enabled a multitude of civilian and military applications. The second paper looks at a development that has revolutionized the employment of air power. The use of laser research and the GPS has enabled ever-increasing precision strikes at ever-increasing distances. From tens of bombers dropping hundreds of bombs to hit a single target in World War II, now a single aircraft can strike several targets. Precision also raises expectations for minimizing collateral damage and puts high priority on detecting targets, identifying them correctly, and tracking them. Advances in electro-optical/infrared imaging, in radar, and in lasers have become the triad for remote sensing, where the objective has been to “overcome the problems of great distances, weather, and darkness,” articulated by von Kármán. The third paper focuses on infrared cameras from their first beginnings to their employment in unmanned aerial vehicles such as the Predator and Global Hawk. The fourth paper looks at airborne radar, whether in AWACS or in Joint STARS, two systems that have revolutionized the conduct of air-to-air and air-to-ground operations. Soon after the first powered flight in 1903, the effects of the high altitude environment on the performance of pilots became a concern. Research on the effects of hypoxia went back to balloonists in the late nineteenth century. With the creation in 1918 of the Air Service Medical Research Laboratory, it became possible to establish the scientific foundation for the development of a wide variety of equipment, from oxygen masks to the pressure suits of today, that would enable air crews to fly higher and for longer periods of time. The fifth paper traces that history and the accomplishments of such pioneers as Armstrong, Stapp, and Kittinger. The paper also includes the story of a particular mission of the SR–71, an aircraft that flew at 80,000 feet, at the edge of space, at three times the speed of sound—an extreme environment indeed. The sixth paper, not presented at the symposium, describes the Air Force research in weather, not only the effort to understand terrestrial weather, but also space weather. The launching of U.S. satellites, which started in 1958, led to the discovery of the Van Allen belts. This was a major scientific discovery that began the mapping of the space environment, a necessary condition for sending unmanned and manned spacecraft to space. To reach space, whether for scientific, military, or commercial purposes, a launch capability was needed. In the early years of the space age, this capability was provided by the Air Force’s long-range ballistic missiles—Atlas, Titan, and Thor. The seventh paper records 2 Introduction the history and the systems that have allowed the U.S. to launch satellites that have provided extraordinary sensing capabilities and global communications.
Recommended publications
  • Strong Signal Cancellation to Enhance Processing Of
    Europäisches Patentamt *EP001238485B1* (19) European Patent Office Office européen des brevets (11) EP 1 238 485 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.7: H04J 13/04, G01S 3/16, of the grant of the patent: G01S 13/00, H04B 1/707 28.09.2005 Bulletin 2005/39 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 00992803.7 PCT/US2000/042171 (22) Date of filing: 14.11.2000 (87) International publication number: WO 2001/047171 (28.06.2001 Gazette 2001/26) (54) STRONG SIGNAL CANCELLATION TO ENHANCE PROCESSING OF WEAK SPREAD SPECTRUM SIGNAL STARKE SIGNALUNTERDRÜCKUNG UM DIE VERARBEITUNG VON SCHWACHEN SPREIZSPEKTRUMSIGNALEN ZU VERBESSERN ANNULATION DE SIGNAL FORT DANS LE BUT D’AMELIORER LE TRAITEMENT D’UN SIGNAL FAIBLE A SPECTRE ETALE (84) Designated Contracting States: (74) Representative: Kramer - Barske - Schmidtchen AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU European Patent Attorneys MC NL PT SE TR Patenta Radeckestrasse 43 (30) Priority: 14.12.1999 US 461123 81245 München (DE) (43) Date of publication of application: (56) References cited: 11.09.2002 Bulletin 2002/37 WO-A-98/18210 US-A- 4 701 934 US-A- 5 493 588 US-A- 5 604 503 (73) Proprietor: Sirf Technology, Inc. San Jose, CA 95112 (US) • SUST M K ET AL: "Code and frequency acquisition for fully digital CDMA-VSATs" (72) Inventors: COUNTDOWN TO THE NEW MILENNIUM. • NORMAN, Charles, P. PHOENIX, DEC. 2 - 5, 1991, PROCEEDINGS OF Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (US) THE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS • CAHN, Charles, R. CONFERENCE. (GLOBECOM), NEW YORK, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (US) IEEE, US, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Warfare Fundamentals
    ELECTRONIC WARFARE FUNDAMENTALS NOVEMBER 2000 PREFACE Electronic Warfare Fundamentals is a student supplementary text and reference book that provides the foundation for understanding the basic concepts underlying electronic warfare (EW). This text uses a practical building-block approach to facilitate student comprehension of the essential subject matter associated with the combat applications of EW. Since radar and infrared (IR) weapons systems present the greatest threat to air operations on today's battlefield, this text emphasizes radar and IR theory and countermeasures. Although command and control (C2) systems play a vital role in modern warfare, these systems are not a direct threat to the aircrew and hence are not discussed in this book. This text does address the specific types of radar systems most likely to be associated with a modern integrated air defense system (lADS). To introduce the reader to EW, Electronic Warfare Fundamentals begins with a brief history of radar, an overview of radar capabilities, and a brief introduction to the threat systems associated with a typical lADS. The two subsequent chapters introduce the theory and characteristics of radio frequency (RF) energy as it relates to radar operations. These are followed by radar signal characteristics, radar system components, and radar target discrimination capabilities. The book continues with a discussion of antenna types and scans, target tracking, and missile guidance techniques. The next step in the building-block approach is a detailed description of countermeasures designed to defeat radar systems. The text presents the theory and employment considerations for both noise and deception jamming techniques and their impact on radar systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (Cscs)/Rescue Flight Resource Book
    CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS)/RESCUE FLIGHT RESOURCE BOOK OVERVIEW 1 Mission Operations CSCS 2 Directorate RESCUE 3 FLIGHT DA8/Flight Director Office Final July 12, 2005 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas FINAL 07/12/05 2-i Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS)/RESCUE FLIGHT RESOURCE BOOK FINAL JULY 12, 2005 PREFACE This document, dated May 24, 2005, is the Basic version of the Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (CSCS)/Rescue Flight Resource Book. It is requested that any organization having comments, questions, or suggestions concerning this document should contact DA8/Book Manager, Flight Director Office, Building 4 North, Room 3039. This is a limited distribution and controlled document and is not to be reproduced without the written approval of the Chief, Flight Director Office, mail code DA8, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058. FINAL 07/12/05 2-ii Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 1.0 - OVERVIEW Section 1.0 is the overview of the entire Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (CSCS)/Rescue Flight Resource Book. FINAL 07/12/05 2-iii Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 This page intentionally blank. FINAL 07/12/05 2-iv Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 2.0 - CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS) 2.1 Procedures Overview.......................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Loran C Cycle Matching Operational Evaluation in North Pacific Area
    ~Opy 19 Report No. FAA ...RD-75-142 1-= FAA WJH Technical Center 1111\\\ 11\\1 11m 11111 11m 11111 1III1 11111 11111111 00090609 LORAN C CYCLE MATCHING OPERATIONAL EVALUATION IN NORTH PACIFIC AREA Jon R. Hamilton . .. NAFEC :~. LIBRARY DEC 2197~· # . October 1975 Final Report Document is avai lable to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Preparell for u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Systems Research &Development Service Washington, D.C. 20590 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of infor­ mation exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. 1 -=~,....e;.,...~_r~_~.,...~.,...' ~T 'I";~T,iW', 1--:-_' -..,..7_5..,..-_1_4_2 ....'·-O:;;;;-"=;;;;=:--.-- (000'0' No 4. Tit'e and Subtitle 5. Rer,ort Dote Loran C Cycle Matching Operational Evaluation in October 1975 North Pacific Area I-:- ------::-------:::----~--_1 1'-::--:---:--:-:---------------------------- ,g. P .. rio-Ming Orgonlzation Report N.o. 7. Author/ .) Jon R. Hami 1ton P~rfo,mi"g 9. l.Ontlnenta Organitotjpi) I-\lr N.p[e. lneS, and Acld'fu nco In. Wark Unit No. /TRAIS) International Airport 11. Cont'oct or Grant No. Los Angeles, California 90009 DOT -FA75WA-3607 -:-. '--'~"--"----'-'" ._.---------­ 1J. 1" yp.. "f Qepc"t 01"1' Period Coy"r.d ~-....,.....-----_._---_._._._----.-_._--.-. __._._.__..._. __ ._---._.._." 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and ~cldr..". Final Department of Transportation I October 1975 Federal Aviation Administration Systems Research and Development Service 14. Spc.nsorinll Agene./ Code Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton's Laws, G-Forces and the Impact on the Brain Zasady
    The Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing 2019;8(3):133–137 Pielęgniarstwo Neurologiczne i Neurochirurgiczne THE JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL AND NEUROSURGICAL NURSING /JNNN 2019;8(3):133–137 2019;8(3):133–137 eISSN 2299-0321 ISSN 2084-8021 www.jnnn.pl Review DOI: 10.15225/PNN.2019.8.3.6 Newton’s Laws, G-forces and the Impact on the Brain Zasady Newtona, siła grawitacyjna a ich wpływ na mózg Vicki Evans Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia Abstract The thrill to go fast and push boundaries is something that many seek. From John Stapp’s rocket sled at Edwards Air Force Base in the late 1950’s to todays’ Formula 1 drivers, the “need for speed” is broadcast across TV screens weekly. So too are the horror stories of crashes, many at over 300 km/hr. Yet “need for speed” continues. It appears that the higher and faster the rollercoaster, the better. This leads to several questions. How does the brain stand up to speed and G-forces? Do Newton’s Laws still have reference in today’s world? There has been much attention in the general press on the possibility that high G-force roller-coasters are inducing brain injury in riders. However, research does not wholeheartedly support this notion, but rather the risk of brain injury from a rollercoaster is not in the rides, but in the rider — caused by previously undetected brain or neck conditions. That said there is some truth that high G-forces do affect the brain at a chemical and structural level.
    [Show full text]
  • A Software-Defined Receiver Architecture for Cellular CDMA
    A Software-Defined Receiver Architecture for Cellular CDMA-Based Navigation Joe Khalife, Kimia Shamaei, and Zaher M. Kassas Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California, Riverside [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] { } Abstract—A detailed software-defined receiver (SDR) architec- and need to be estimated. Although, the IS-95 standard states ture for navigation using cellular code division multiple access that a CDMA BTS should transmit its position, local wireless (CDMA) signals is presented. The cellular forward-link signal providers do not usually transmit such information [16], [17]. structure is described and models for the transmitted and received signals are developed. Particular attention is paid to Hence, the position of the BTSs need to be manually surveyed relevant information that could be extracted and subsequently or estimated on-the-fly individually or collaboratively [18], exploited for navigation and timing purposes. The differences [19]. Nevertheless, while the position states of a BTS are between a typical GPS receiver and the proposed cellular CDMA static, the clock error states of the BTS are dynamic and receiver are highlighted. Moreover, a framework that is based on need to be continuously estimated via (1) a mapping receiver, a mapping/navigating receiver scheme for navigation in a cellular CDMA environment is studied. The position and timing errors which shares such estimates with the navigating receiver or (2) arising due to estimating the base transceiver station clock biases by the navigating receiver itself by adopting a simultaneous in different cell sectors are also analyzed. Experimental results localization and mapping approach [20], [21], [22].
    [Show full text]
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 (NGRER FY 2015) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2014 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Materiel and Facilities) COL Denise L. Loring, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $292,000 in Fiscal Years 2013–2014. Generated on 2014Feb28 RefID: 0-43F5A8A OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1500 FOREWORD The Reserve Component (RC) allows for expanded capacity and capability as a cost-effective part of the Total Force with global reach and flexibility. Since 2001, the RC has supported more than 875,000 mobilizations worldwide. Budgetary pressures will continue to require astute management of reduced resources to mitigate their effects. The RC provides capability and capacity at a reduced cost in a time of funding reductions across all components. The RC, when integrated as part of the operational force during armed conflict and peacetime, provides for a cost-effective force mix at acceptable levels of risk to support the defense strategy. The RC equipment levels are at some of the highest levels in history; however this era of postwar fiscal reductions will bring significant equipping challenges over the next several years. The Department has made strides in enhancing equipment transparency and accountability, but has not yet attained transparency into the Services procurement and distribution processes and outcomes. The Department must explore other options, such as separating the RC procurement funding, to meet the intent of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserve initiatives on equipping inadequacies between Active Component (AC) and RC.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System Major Weapon Systems OVERVIEW
    The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $32,000 for the 2017 Fiscal Year. This includes $13,000 in expenses and $19,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2017May03 RefID: E-7DE12B0 FY 2018 Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System Major Weapon Systems OVERVIEW The combined capabilities and performance of United States (U.S.) weapon systems are unmatched throughout the world, ensuring that U.S. military forces have the advantage over any adversary. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 acquisition funding request for the Department of Defense (DoD) budget totals $208.6 billion, which includes base funding and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funding; $125.2 billion for Procurement funded programs and $83.3 billion for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) funded programs. Of the $208.6 billion, $94.9 billion is for programs that have been designated as Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs). This book focuses on all funding for the key MDAP programs. To simplify the display of the various weapon systems, this book is organized by the following mission area categories: Mission Area Categories • Aircraft & Related Systems • Missiles and Munitions • Command, Control, Communications, • Mission Support Activities Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) Systems • RDT&E Science & Technology • Ground Systems • Shipbuilding and Maritime Systems • Missile Defense Programs • Space Based Systems FY 2018 Modernization – Total: $208.6 Billion ($ in Billions) Space Based Aircraft & Systems Related $9.8
    [Show full text]
  • Life Support Baseline Values and Assumptions Document
    NASA/TP-2015–218570 Life Support Baseline Values and Assumptions Document Editors: Molly S. Anderson Michael K. Ewert John F. Keener Sandra A. Wagner Responsible National Aeronautics and Space Administration Official: Molly S. Anderson CTSD, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mail Code EC2 2101 NASA Road One Houston, Texas 77058 March 2015 THE NASA STI PROGRAM OFFICE . IN PROFILE Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientific and technical conferences, NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) symposia, seminars, or other meetings sponsored Program Office plays a key part in helping NASA or cosponsored by NASA. maintain this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by or historical information from NASA programs, Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASA’s projects, and mission, often concerned with scientific and technical information. The NASA STI subjects having substantial public interest. Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest collection of aeronautical and • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- space science STI in the world. The Program Office language translations of foreign scientific and is also NASA’s institutional mechanism for technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results are published Specialized services that complement the STI by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Program Office’s diverse offerings include creating includes the following report types: custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results .
    [Show full text]