DOCSLIB.ORG

1 a Rupini A/P Ambalagan 2 A. Amudhan A/L Arumugam 3 A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 a Rupini A/P Ambalagan 2 A. Amudhan A/L Arumugam 3 A NO NAMA PELAJAR 1 A RUPINI A/P AMBALAGAN 2 A. AMUDHAN A/L ARUMUGAM 3 A. LALITH KUMAR A/L ARUMUGAM 4 A.DHARSHINIE A/P S.S.AITHIETHAN 5 AARON CHONG MING XUAN 6 AARON CHOW CHUN YEE 7 AARON DINESH A/L ALVIN MANOJ 8 AARON LIM LI PENG 9 AARON LYE ZHI SHENG 10 AARON MATTHEW KOH 11 AARON PATRICK NATHANIEL 12 AARON RAJ A/L MAYA 13 AARON TAN JEE KUAN 14 AARON TAN MOK YEE 15 AARON TAY HONG KIAT 16 AARON TAY JUN HONG 17 AARON WONG CHERK PANG 18 AARUN LOH WEI WERN 19 AASHINI SHAH 20 AATHEETHYAN S/O TIVIMURUTHY 21 AB FITRI BIN AB AZIZ 22 ABADAN JASMON 23 ABANG MUHAMAD ANIQ ZIKRY BIN ABANG ABDUL RAHMAN 24 ABAS AZMI BIN ABAS MAZNI 25 ABBY ASHRAFF SAPRUDIN 26 ABBYGAIL FAM SWEE MAY 27 ABDUL AFIQ BIN ABDUL SUKOR 28 ABDUL AFIQ HANI B ABDUL ALIM 29 ABDUL AIMAN AKMAL RAHMAT 30 ABDUL ALIM BIN MOHAMED KEPPOL 31 ABDUL ARIF AL-AZIZI BIN ABDUL AZIZ 32 ABDUL AZIZ BIN MOHD BAGHOWI 33 ABDUL AZIZ BIN MOHD RIDZUAN 34 ABDUL AZMEER BIN A H ABDUL AZIZ 35 ABDUL GHANY FHAMIE BIN IZANY 36 ABDUL HAADIE BIN RIDZWAN 37 ABDUL HADI BIN ABDUL HARIS 38 ABDUL HADI BIN YAZID 39 ABDUL HADI HAKIM BIN ROHAIME 40 ABDUL HAKIM BIN ABDULLAH THANI 41 ABDUL HAKIM BIN MOHD RAZIFF 42 ABDUL HALIM BIN ABDUL KADIR 43 ABDUL HALIM BIN NORZAHARI 44 ABDUL HANNAN AFFIQ BIN ABDUL HALIM 45 ABDUL HARITH BIN ABD RAHMAN 46 ABDUL MALIK BIN ABDUL RAHIM 47 ABDUL MALIK FAIZAN BIN JAMALUDDIN AHMAD 48 ABDUL MUHAIMIN BIN AB AZIZ 49 ABDUL MU'IN BIN MUKHNI 50 ABDUL MUIZ BIN ABADAN 51 ABDUL MUKMIN BIN ABDUL RAHIM 52 ABDUL MUQSIT BIN HASSAN 53 ABDUL QAYYUM BIN YAZID 54 ABDUL QAYYUUM BIN HAMDAN 55 ABDUL RAHIM BIN ABDUL HAMID 56 ABDUL RAHIM BIN ZAHARIAN 57 ABDUL RAHMAN AFIF BIN MOHD KHOLIL 58 ABDUL RAHMAN BIN AZIZ 59 ABDUL RAHMAN BIN ISKANDAR 60 ABDUL RAHMAN BIN MOHD HATTA 61 ABDUL RASHEED BIN ABDUL JANAB 62 ABDUL RASYID BIN ABDUL LATIFF 63 ABDUL RASYID BIN MOHD ABDULLAH 64 ABDUL RAUF BIN RUSLAN 65 ABDUL RAUF RAHIMI BIN HASAN 66 ABDUL SHAMIN BIN ABD SALIM 67 ABDUL SYUKUR BIN ABIDULLAH 68 ABDULLAH AMIRULAMIN BIN HAMID 69 ABDULLAH AMMAR BIN AHMAD AZHAR 70 ABDULLAH AZIM BIN ABDULLAH ZAWAWI 71 ABDULLAH HAKIM B ABD HAMID 72 ABDULLAH HAKIM BIN ABDUL AZIZ 73 ABDULLAH ISLAM BIN SHUKOR 74 ABDULLAH SALLEHUDDIN ABDULLAH SALIM 75 ABDURRAHMAN BIN AZHAR 76 ABEGH BIN MOHD RAZIB 77 ABEL ATHI KUMAR A/L VIJAYAKUMAR 78 ABG MOHD FIRDAUS BIN ABG MALUDIN 79 ABHISHEK A/L GUNVANTRAI 80 ABILASHAN A/L VIRAN 81 ABIRAMINI A/P PALANIAPPAN 82 ABIRRAAMI KRISHNAN 83 ABSYARIE SYAFIQ BIN SHAHRIN 84 ABU HUZAIFAH BIN MOHAMAD 85 ABU MUSLIM BIN AMINUDDIN 86 ABU ZAKI BIN ABU DIN 87 ADALINE BASKARAN 88 ADAM ASYRAF BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 89 ADAM BIN A.RAHIM 90 ADAM BIN MOHAMAD NOR 91 ADAM BIN MOHD SHUKOR 92 ADAM BIN YUSOF 93 ADAM BIN ZAINALABIDIN 94 ADAM DB ALUDAH 95 ADAM DZARIF BIN FARID ZAINEDDIN 96 ADAM GAN JIAN MING 97 ADAM HAKEEM BIN MOHD ZAKHIR 98 ADAM HELMI 99 ADAM LUQMAN BIN AZAHA 100 ADAM SHAFUAN BIN MOHAMED ASRI 101 ADDINA ADLIN BINTI MOHD AMIN 102 ADE ADRIAN BIN AMAT 103 ADELENE LEE HUEI SHR 104 ADELIA HAZEERA BTE HIZAMUDIN 105 ADELINE CHOW MEI YIN 106 ADELINE LEE JING RU 107 ADELINE PHYLICIA KNIGHT 108 ADELINE TAN SIN YEE 109 ADELINE TOH HUEY SHIN 110 ADHWA SYUHADAH BINTI AZHAR 111 ADI @ MUHAMMAD BIN ABDULLAH 112 ADI SYUKRI BIN MD YUSOF 113 ADI ZAFRAN BIN ZABIDI 114 ADIB ASYRAF BIN OSMAN 115 ADIB FITRI BIN AZHARI 116 ADIB MUSTAQIM BIN MUSTAFA 117 ADIB ZAIDI BIN AZHAR 118 ADIBA ALYA ZAFIRA BINTI ARJUNAIDI 119 ADIBA HANANI BINTI AZMIR 120 ADIBAH HUSNA BINTI ERIZAL 121 ADIL BIN BAHAROM 122 'ADILAH BINTI MOHAMAD ROFIE 123 ADILAH HANANI BT JAMAL KHAIR 124 ADLAN SYAZWAN BIN ABDUL RAZAK 125 ADLEEN SYAHEERA BINTI ABDUL JALIL 126 ADLI DINIE BIN BAHARUDIN 127 ADLI HAKEEM BIN ROSMAN 128 ADNAN ARIF BIN JAZLAN 129 ADNAN BIN ABDULLAH HASBI 130 ADREENA BINTI FAIZAL 131 ADRENA BINTI ADAM 132 ADRI AIMAN BIN MD ANUAR MUSADDAD 133 ADRIAN A/L JAYARAJ PAUL 134 ADRIAN CHONG FU SEN 135 ADRIAN GAN SIANG WAI 136 ADRIAN LEE WAI KIN 137 ADRIAN LIM KUAN HWANG 138 ADRIAN LU CHIAN CHERN 139 ADRIAN ONG MENG CHUN 140 ADRIAN PHUNG KHAI SHERN 141 ADRIAN RONALD ANAK SEHAT 142 ADRIAN TAN MENG WEE 143 ADRIAN TAN YEN SERN 144 ADRIAN TAN YOU JIAN 145 ADRIAN VAZ 146 ADRIAN WONG ZHI QIAN 147 ADRIAN YAP YONGYAN 148 ADRIAN YEAP KONG WAY 149 ADRIANA IWANI BINTI AHMAD 150 ADRINE CHEN BAU YEE 151 ADZLAN SAAD BIN AZMI 152 AFANDI BIN YUSOF 153 AFDHAL NIDZAM BIN ABD RAFFAR 154 AFENDI BIN NORZAMAN 155 AFFIQ ASRIL BIN JAINUDDIN 156 AFIAH NASUHA BINTI NORAZLAN 157 AFIF ASYRAF SYAHME BIN ABD SHUKOR 158 AFIF JAZIMIN BIN SAIFUL HAZMI 159 AFIFAH AFIF BINTI AZMAN 160 'AFIFAH BINTI ABDUL RAHIM 161 AFIFUDDIN BIN ALWI @ ALI 162 AFIQ AKMAL BIN AHMAD TAHRIM 163 AFIQ ASYRAF BIN AZIZI 164 AFIQ BIN ABDUL HAMID 165 AFIQ BIN TARIQ 166 AFIQ BIN ZAKARIA 167 AFIQ HUSAINI BIN SAYUTHI 168 AFIQ MUZAKKIR BIN MAT ALI 169 AFIQ NASRI BIN OTHMAN 170 AFIQ ZULHANNI BIN MOHD FAZLI 171 AFIQ ZULHILMI AIMAN BIN HISHAM SHAH 172 AFIQAH BINTI ABDUL RAZAK 173 AFIQAH BINTI SHA'AZZA 174 AFIQAH BTE MOHD SEPUAN 175 AFIQAH IZZATI BINTI MOHD AZLIN 176 AFIQAH NADIAH BINTI AHMAD NAZRAN 177 AFIQUE AIMAN BIN SHAHBANI 178 AFIQUE AIMAN BIN SHAHBANI 179 AFLAH NASHUHA BINTI ALI 180 AFNAIM BIN ABDUL KARIM 181 AFRINA ANIS BINTI ASMADI 182 AFRINA BINTI AHMAD MAZELAN 183 AGNES ANN A/P MARTIN 184 AHMAD ABDUL HAKIN BIN ABDULLAH 185 AHMAD ADAM BIN AHMAD YUSRI 186 AHMAD ADIB MUZZAMMIL BIN MOHD SYAHROL ANUAR 187 AHMAD ADIL BIN MAZLAN 188 AHMAD AFHAM BIN KAMARUDDIN 189 AHMAD AFI BIN AHMAD RIDZUAN 190 AHMAD AFIF AIMAN BIN AHMAD SAZALI 191 AHMAD AFIQ BIN BAHARUDIN 192 AHMAD AFIQ BIN MOHD MURAD 193 AHMAD AFIQ BIN MUHAMMAD FUAD 194 AHMAD AIMAN NAQIUDDIN BIN AHMAD NASRULDIN 195 AHMAD AKMAL BIN MOHD DIN 196 AHMAD AL IQBAL BIN AHMAD AL JEFFRY 197 AHMAD AMIN BIN ABD RASHID 198 AHMAD AMIRUL SYAFIQ BIN MOHD SHARIF 199 AHMAD AMMAR BIN ABDUL AZIZ 200 AHMAD ANIQ BIN AHMAD AZIZUDDIN 201 AHMAD AQMAR BIN AZIZI 202 AHMAD ARAFAT BIN MOHD ALI 203 AHMAD 'ARIEF BIN MOHD NOR 204 AHMAD ARIFF BIN AHMAD KHUSAIRY 205 AHMAD ASLAM BIN ABDULLAH 206 AHMAD ASYRAF BIN AHMAD KAMARUDDIN 207 AHMAD ASYRAF BIN AHMAD ZAIFLIQHAR HAFIZ 208 AHMAD ASYRAF BIN MOHD SHAIBI 209 AHMAD ASYRAF BIN SHAARI 210 AHMAD AZFAR BIN AHMAD JAMIL 211 AHMAD AZHARUL NIZAM BIN ABDUL AZIZ 212 AHMAD AZIZI BIN MOHAMMAD ZAM ZAM 213 AHMAD AZLAN BIN AHMAD ZAFRI 214 AHMAD AZRI BIN AZHAARUDDIN 215 AHMAD BAIHAQI BIN MOHD DAWAM 216 AHMAD BASYIER BIN MD. YUSOFF 217 AHMAD BURHAN BIN MUSTAFAR 218 AHMAD DANIAL BIN AHMAD RIZAL 219 AHMAD DANIEL BIN HARIS FADZILAH 220 AHMAD EIZAZ IRFAN BIN ABD KHALID 221 AHMAD ERSYAD BIN AZMI 222 AHMAD FAHMI BIN AHMAD SABKI 223 AHMAD FAHMI BIN ARIFFIN 224 AHMAD FAIEZLAN BIN AHMAD MARZUKEE 225 AHMAD FAISAL AMIR BIN AHMAD NAZRI 226 AHMAD FAISAL BIN ABDUL AZIZ 227 AHMAD FAIZ BIN ABDUL KARIM 228 AHMAD FAIZ BIN AHMAD BAKHTIAR 229 AHMAD FAIZ BIN AMIRUDEAN 230 AHMAD FAIZ BIN JAMALUDIN 231 AHMAD FARHAN AIMAN BIN AHMAD SABRI 232 AHMAD FARHAN BIN AHMAD 233 AHMAD FARHAN BIN AMRAN 234 AHMAD FARHAN MAULA AHMAD SAH 235 AHMAD FARHANAZRIN BIN HUZIR 236 AHMAD FARID BIN MOHD KHALIL 237 AHMAD FARIS BIN AHMAD ZAMRI 238 AHMAD FARISI BIN AZMI 239 AHMAD FARIZ BIN AB PATAH 240 AHMAD FAROUK BIN AHMAD FAUZI 241 AHMAD FARRIDZ BIN RIDZWAN 242 AHMAD FAUZAN BIN MOHD NAZARUDDIN 243 AHMAD FAZIRUL MUBIN BIN ISA 244 AHMAD FIQRY KHAN BIN AHMAD NAZRI KHAN 245 AHMAD FIRDAUS BIN AHMAD AZMI 246 AHMAD FIRDAUS BIN AHMAD HAMIZAN 247 AHMAD FIRDAUS BIN AMIR 248 AHMAD FIRDAUS BIN HAZALI 249 AHMAD FIRDAUS BIN MOHD NASIR 250 AHMAD FU'AD BIN AHMAD FU'AD 251 AHMAD FUAD BIN AHMAD ZAILANI 252 AHMAD HADI BIN ROSMAN 253 AHMAD HAFIDZ BIN DZUL KARNAIN 254 AHMAD HAFIZ AZIZ BIN ALI 255 AHMAD HAFIZ BIN AHMAD TAHIRUDDIN 256 AHMAD HAFIZZI BIN ZUBIR 257 AHMAD HAMIZAN BIN A AZIZ 258 AHMAD HAMZAH BIN MOHD ANUAR 259 AHMAD HAZIQ KHAN BIN ABDUL HADDY KHAN 260 AHMAD HISHAMUDDIN HASSAN 261 AHMAD HIZAMI BIN AHAMAD LOTAFI 262 AHMAD HUDZAIFAH BIN ROSLAN 263 AHMAD IKHWAN BIN MASUHAIMI 264 AHMAD IKHWAN BIN RIDZUAN 265 AHMAD ISKANDAR BIN MAZALAN 266 AHMAD ISYRAF BIN JAMIL 267 AHMAD IZZAT AMIR BIN AHMAD BAHIKI 268 AHMAD IZZAT BIN AHMAD GHAZALI 269 AHMAD IZZAZ BIN MOHAMED IQBAL 270 AHMAD IZZUDDIN BIN ZAMRI 271 AHMAD JOHAN BIN ABDUL HAMID 272 AHMAD KAMAL BIN MOHAMED NAWI 273 AHMAD KAMIL BIN AHMAD ROSLAN ZAKI 274 AHMAD KHAIRI BIN AHMAD KHIR 275 AHMAD LUQMAN BIN AHMAD MIRZA 276 AHMAD LUQMAN BIN MD SAID 277 AHMAD LUQMAN FARIS BIN ZULKIFLI 278 AHMAD LUQMAN HAKIM BIN MOHD YAZSID 279 AHMAD MIRZA IZRAND BIN AHMAD ZAKI 280 AHMAD MUQRI BIN AHMAD BADRI 281 AHMAD MUSA BIN MUHAMMAD 282 AHMAD MUSTAQIM BIN MOHD AMIN 283 AHMAD MUZAFFAR BIN HAZIZAN 284 AHMAD NABIL BIN AHMAD ROSLAN ZAKI 285 AHMAD NADIR BIN AHMAD ROZALAN 286 AHMAD NADZMI BIN AHMAD ZAKI 287 AHMAD NADZMI BIN ANUAR 288 AHMAD NAIM BIN NURHAIZAN 289 AHMAD NAIM BIN RAZALI 290 AHMAD NASRUDDEEN BIN MOSTAFA ELNAHTA 291 AHMAD NASRULLAH BIN ABDUL RAZAK 292 AHMAD NASZUAN BIN MOHD NASIB 293 AHMAD NAUFAL BIN MD HALID 294 AHMAD NAZEER BIN ABU BAKAR 295 AHMAD NAZERIN BIN AHMAD NAZERI 296 AHMAD NAZMI BIN ANUAR 297 AHMAD NAZMI BIN BAHRUDDIN 298 AHMAD NAZREEN BIN AHMAD KAMARULZAMAN 299 AHMAD NAZREEN BIN KANARUDDIN 300 AHMAD NIZAM BIN RAMLAN 301 AHMAD NUR AWALLUDDIN BIN ZAKARIA 302 AHMAD NUR HAZIM BIN SHARARUDDIN 303 AHMAD RADZI BIN MOHD BEDU 304 AHMAD RASHAD BIN AHMAD SUHAIMEE 305 AHMAD RASYAD BIN ABDUL AZIZ 306 AHMAD RASYDAN BIN CHE KAMARUDDIN 307 AHMAD RAZMAN BIN RAZALI 308 AHMAD REDZUAN BIN ABDUL RAUF 309 AHMAD RIFA'IE BIN APANDI 310 AHMAD RIFAUDIN BIN HAJA SAMSUDIN 311 AHMAD SAFUAN BIN MUHAMMAD SHAHRIL 312 AHMAD SAFWAN BIN SAADUN 313 AHMAD SAHILL ZAINAL ABIDIN 314 AHMAD SAIFUDDIN BIN SHARUDDIN 315 AHMAD SAIFUDDIN BIN ZAZALI 316 AHMAD SAIFULLAH MOHAMAD 317 AHMAD SHAFIQ ASPAR 318 AHMAD SHAFIZ BIN SHAHARUDIN 319 AHMAD SHAKIR BIN ROSLAN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan
    Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan Abstract In Singapore, the percentage of elected female politicians rose from 3.8 percent in 1984 to 22.5 percent after the 2015 general election. After years of exclusion, why were gender reforms adopted and how did they lead to more women in political office? Unlike South Korea and Taiwan, this paper shows that in Singapore party pragmatism rather than international diffusion of gender equality norms, feminist lobbying, or rival party pressures drove gender reforms. It is argued that the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) strategic and electoral calculations to maintain hegemonic rule drove its policy u-turn to nominate an average of about 17.6 percent female candidates in the last three elections. Similar to the PAP’s bid to capture women voters in the 1959 elections, it had to alter its patriarchal, conservative image to appeal to the younger, progressive electorate in the 2000s. Additionally, Singapore’s electoral system that includes multi-member constituencies based on plurality party bloc vote rule also makes it easier to include women and diversify the party slate. But despite the strategic and electoral incentives, a gender gap remains. Drawing from a range of public opinion data, this paper explains why traditional gender stereotypes, biased social norms, and unequal family responsibilities may hold women back from full political participation. Keywords: gender reforms, party pragmatism, plurality party bloc vote, multi-member constituencies, ethnic quotas, PAP, Singapore DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5509/2016892369 ____________________ Netina Tan is an assistant professor of political science at McMaster University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rule of Law and Urban Development
    The Rule of Law and Urban Development The transformation of Singapore from a struggling, poor country into one of the most affluent nations in the world—within a single generation—has often been touted as an “economic miracle”. The vision and pragmatism shown by its leaders has been key, as has its STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS notable political stability. What has been less celebrated, however, while being no less critical to Singapore’s urban development, is the country’s application of the rule of law. The rule of law has been fundamental to Singapore’s success. The Rule of Law and Urban Development gives an overview of the role played by the rule of law in Singapore’s urban development over the past 54 years since independence. It covers the key principles that characterise Singapore’s application of the rule of law, and reveals deep insights from several of the country’s eminent urban pioneers, leaders and experts. It also looks at what ongoing and future The Rule of Law and Urban Development The Rule of Law developments may mean for the rule of law in Singapore. The Rule of Law “ Singapore is a nation which is based wholly on the Rule of Law. It is clear and practical laws and the effective observance and enforcement and Urban Development of these laws which provide the foundation for our economic and social development. It is the certainty which an environment based on the Rule of Law generates which gives our people, as well as many MNCs and other foreign investors, the confidence to invest in our physical, industrial as well as social infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM
    Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law.
    [Show full text]
  • One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan
    One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.
    [Show full text]
  • View Brochure
    th ANNIVERSARY Artist Impression of the School of Law. CONTENTS e First Decade e Founding Years e Future 2 LAW OF SCHOOL 3 LAW OF SCHOOL e idea of the “We were audacious aer “Aer sending in the proposal, I told SMU Law School receiving encouragement – we my colleagues in the Law Department was in the minds were cautioned to take it slowly we had a 50-50 chance of getting a law of the SMU and open the school a few years school. e arguments for it – diversity, later than when we actually did. competition and SMU’s development – leadership from We took a risk but being young were compelling enough, but whether the university’s and impatient, we discarded the proposal would be accepted inception. caution and brought forward depended on the powers that be. When our vision by a few years. In the the good news came, we were elated! end, we pulled it o and the Law It was a great privilege to have been School has been acknowledged involved in the start-up of the SMU Law as one of the nest in Asia since School - a memory I will always cherish.” then. e moral? Carpe diem … seize the day!” Associate Professor Low Kee Yang, School of Law Mr Ho Kwon Ping, Chairman, Board of Trustees, SMU “A Law School was in the original plan of SMU. It’s a natural discipline that ts in well with the original concept of a management university.” Professor Tan Chin Tiong, Senior Advisor to President, SMU 5 LAW OF SCHOOL “I remember receiving a call, as president, in early 2007 saying that the opening of a new “It was vital for the School to law school at SMU had been oer a distinct law education approved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of Singaporean National Identity in the Rhetoric of Lee Kuan Yew from 1965
    Reclaiming Agency The Construction of Singaporean National Identity in the Rhetoric of Lee Kuan Yew from 1965 – 1970 by Bao En Toh Reclaiming Agency The Construction of Singaporean National Identity in the Rhetoric of Lee Kuan Yew from 1965 – 1970 by Bao En Toh A thesis presented for the B. A. degree with Honors in The Department of English University of Michigan Spring 2011 © 21st March 2011, Bao En Toh For Singapore and for Lee Kuan Yew, in appreciation of his lifetime‘s work Acknowledgements I am extremely indebted to Professor David Porter, my thesis advisor, for his invaluable advice and generous encouragement throughout the writing of this thesis. He has unwaveringly supported my work since September 2010, from the very genesis of this project. Professor Porter has been the only person to read every part of this lengthy thesis as it was produced, even going over some sections more than once. In spite of my tardiness in finishing drafts he has always stoically made time to critique my work before our meetings. I am deeply grateful to Professor Porter for always being reassuring, communicative and patient; this thesis would not have been possible without his effort and dedication. Professor Catherine Sanok‘s genius for drawing out insights I never knew I had is matched only by her ability to calm frantic undergraduates—I always emerge from her office feeling inspired and on track. In addition, I cannot thank her enough for keeping me on a brutal but absolutely necessary writing schedule, without which I would still be on my title page.
    [Show full text]
  • First Session FRIDAY, 8 FEBRUARY 2013
    VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH PARLIAMENT OF SINGAPORE First Session FRIDAY, 8 FEBRUARY 2013 No. 42 12.30 pm 296 PRESENT: Mdm SPEAKER (Mdm HALIMAH YACOB (Jurong)). Mr ANG HIN KEE (Ang Mo Kio). Mr ANG WEI NENG (Jurong). Mr BAEY YAM KENG (Tampines). Mr CHAN CHUN SING (Tanjong Pagar), Acting Minister for Social and Family Development and Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Defence. Mr CHEN SHOW MAO (Aljunied). Mrs LINA CHIAM (Non-Constituency Member). Mr CHARLES CHONG (Joo Chiat), Deputy Speaker. Mr CHRISTOPHER DE SOUZA (Holland-Bukit Timah). Ms FAIZAH JAMAL (Nominated Member). Mr NICHOLAS FANG (Nominated Member). Assoc Prof FATIMAH LATEEF (Marine Parade). Mr ARTHUR FONG (West Coast). Mr CEDRIC FOO CHEE KENG (Pioneer). Ms FOO MEE HAR (West Coast). Ms GRACE FU HAI YIEN (Yuhua), Minister, Prime Minister's Office, Second Minister for the Environment and Water Resources and Second Minister for Foreign Affairs. Mr GAN KIM YONG (Chua Chu Kang), Minister for Health and Government Whip. Mr GAN THIAM POH (Pasir Ris-Punggol). Mr GERALD GIAM YEAN SONG (Non-Constituency Member). Mr GOH CHOK TONG (Marine Parade). No. 42 8 FEBRUARY 2013 297 Mr HAWAZI DAIPI (Sembawang), Senior Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Education and Acting Minister for Manpower. Mr HENG CHEE HOW (Whampoa), Senior Minister of State, Prime Minister's Office and Deputy Leader of the House. Mr HENG SWEE KEAT (Tampines), Minister for Education. Mr HRI KUMAR NAIR (Bishan-Toa Payoh). Mr INDERJIT SINGH (Ang Mo Kio). Ms INDRANEE RAJAH (Tanjong Pagar), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Law and Ministry of Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Representation 69
    Written Representation 69 Name: Submission made on behalf of roundtable discussion between Singapore Press Holdings, the National University of Singapore, the Singapore Management University, the Media Literacy Council, Mothership, the Asia Internet Coalition, Twitter, Facebook, Rajah & Tann and others. Received: 28 Feb 2018 Dear Chairman, My name is Alan Soon and I am the Founder of Splice Newsroom. Last Wednesday, I moderated a workshop on Online News Literacy for around 15 participants from the academic and student community, the media and publishing industries and technology companies. Participants include representatives from the Singapore Press Holdings, the National University of Singapore, the Singapore Management University, the Media Literacy Council, Mothership, the Asia Internet Coalition, Twitter, Facebook, Rajah & Tann and others. The participants shared about their respective research and approaches towards deliberate online falsehoods and misinformation, proposed principles and initiatives to addressing the issue, and critically analysed existing global approaches and their applicability to Singapore. We later discussed the nature and risks of deliberate online falsehoods, and whether existing legislation is sufficient to address these risks. We also examined the role of media literacy and the community in aiding the effort against false news. We hope that you will find the notes from our workshop helpful in your deliberations. Yours sincerely, Alan Soon Summary Participants broadly agreed that existing laws are sufficient to deal with deliberate online falsehoods and misinformation, and that there is no need to introduce further legislation. They also agreed that government and the community must do more to enhance digital literacy in Singapore. They acknowledged that there are fault lines in Singaporean society characterised primarily by race, language and religion and that existing laws, alongside media literacy, are critical in addressing these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore's New Discretionary Death Penalty for Drug Couriers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection School Of Law School of Law 7-2014 Singapore's New Discretionary Death Penalty for Drug Couriers: Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan Siyuan CHEN Singapore Management University, [email protected] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2014.18.3.456 Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Evidence Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Citation CHEN, Siyuan. Singapore's New Discretionary Death Penalty for Drug Couriers: Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan. (2014). International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 18, (3), 260-266. Research Collection School Of Law. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1260 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection School Of Law by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. Keywords: Misuse of Drugs Act; Drug trafficking couriers; Presumption of innocence; Discretionary death penalty; Singapore Singapore’s New Discretionary Death Penalty for Drug Couriers Public
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    NATIONAL YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT AWARD ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Today's Youth, Tomorrow's Leaders CONTENT Page Executive Summary 1 Mission 2 Policies 2 Policy Relating to Management and Conflict of Interest 4 Future Plans 4 Review of The Year 2020 5 Review of Financial Status 6 Governance Evaluation Checklist 6 Appendix 1: Organisation Structure 8 Appendix 2: NYAA Advisory Board 9 Appendix 3: NYAA National Council 12 Appendix 4: NYAA Board of Trustees 15 Appendix 5: NYAA Operating Partners 16 Appendix 6: NYAA New Participants and Awards Awarded 21 Appendix 7: Summary of Financial Performance for 2020 22 Appendix 8: Online Financial Summary for 2018 to 2020 23 Appendix 9: Donations for 2020 25 Appendix 10: Valuation Report on Investment Property 26 Appendix 11: National Council Meetings Attendance 27 Appendix 12: Chairman’s Report for 2020 29 Appendix 13: Executive Director’s Report for 2020 32 Our Work: Programmes and Activities NATIONAL YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT AWARD ASSOCIATION ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The National Youth Achievement Award Association was registered on 12 September 1991 under the Societies Act. The Association was approved as a Charity on 12 October 1991. ROS Registration Number: ROS 238/91 UEN No: S91SS0104L Charity Registration Number: 000840 IPC Registration No: 000721 Registered address: 151 Lorong Chuan #06-01B (Lobby A) New Tech Park Singapore 556741 INTRODUCTION The National Youth Achievement Award (NYAA) was officially launched on 9 May 1992 by the President of the Republic of Singapore at the Istana. ADVISORY BOARD The NYAA Council is advised by an Advisory Board chaired by Mr Heng Swee Keat, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Pre-Print of Walid Jumblatt Abdullah (2020) “'New Normal' No
    This is a pre-print of Walid Jumblatt Abdullah (2020) “‘New normal’ no more: democratic backsliding in Singapore after 2015,” Democratization. “New Normal” No More: Democratic Backsliding in Singapore After 2015 Introduction “Is there evidence of a global democratic recession? The answer is unfortunately, yes.”1 The ominous warning has spurred a significant volume of scholarship investigating democratic backsliding.2 Yet, within the field of Comparative Politics, scholars have almost exclusively focused on backsliding in democracies. Scant attention has been paid to democratic backsliding in hybrid regimes. If hybrid regimes are not static, but can move forward or backwards along the spectrum of autocracy and liberalization, then it is crucial to investigate democratic backsliding in hybrid regimes as much as their trajectories towards liberalization. Democratic backsliding in hybrid regimes, which can be defined as an extension of executive powers – formal or informal – and the constricting of political space for non-state actors, whether members of the opposition or civil society, needs to be interrogated, and its causes, understood.3 This article investigates the competitive authoritarian regime of Singapore and the quality of democracy in the city-state since the year 2011. 2011 is chosen as a starting point because it was the year in which the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) suffered its worst ever electoral performance, and subsequently, adopted a softer tone and promised an expansion of the political space. Many analysts expected the PAP to pursue a continued path of liberalization after 2011. Yet, after the subsequent GE in 2015, in which the PAP attained a much higher share of the votes in a resounding victory, there is an apparent democratic backsliding.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen at the Committee of Supply Debate 2013
    Speech by Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen at the Committee of Supply Debate 2013 12 Mar 2013 Madam Chair, first let me thank Members of the House for their very incisive questions and comments, and for their continued support to build up a solid defence for Singapore, Members have asked many difficult questions on wide-ranging topics and I don't think it's possible within the short time that we have to address all the affairs of the world so we will try to address the substantive questions that you've asked. Regional Security Environment Dr Lim Wee Kiak and Ms Ellen Lee asked for an update on the security situation in our region and I think they've summarised it very well. There are increasing tensions in the South and East China Seas. The South China Sea is in our backyard and Singapore will not be able to avoid the consequences if this region becomes more troubled, or worse still, when missteps are made. Further away, as Members have pointed out, North Korea has threatened to void its 1953 armistice agreement with South Korea, after the UN Security Council imposed additional sanctions. Members have touched on the recent intrusion into Sabah by armed followers of the purported heir to the former Sulu Sultanate, and I think this episode reminds us that security challenges can be unpredictable and precipitous. And, no, the Malaysians have not asked for our help, and I think they are well capable of taking care of their defence challenges. Against this backdrop, I think it's more important for us to understand that Asian countries have increased their defence spending.
    [Show full text]