The Circle Line Does Relieve Some of the Rush Hour Crush “It’S a Really Beautiful Line
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan
Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan Abstract In Singapore, the percentage of elected female politicians rose from 3.8 percent in 1984 to 22.5 percent after the 2015 general election. After years of exclusion, why were gender reforms adopted and how did they lead to more women in political office? Unlike South Korea and Taiwan, this paper shows that in Singapore party pragmatism rather than international diffusion of gender equality norms, feminist lobbying, or rival party pressures drove gender reforms. It is argued that the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) strategic and electoral calculations to maintain hegemonic rule drove its policy u-turn to nominate an average of about 17.6 percent female candidates in the last three elections. Similar to the PAP’s bid to capture women voters in the 1959 elections, it had to alter its patriarchal, conservative image to appeal to the younger, progressive electorate in the 2000s. Additionally, Singapore’s electoral system that includes multi-member constituencies based on plurality party bloc vote rule also makes it easier to include women and diversify the party slate. But despite the strategic and electoral incentives, a gender gap remains. Drawing from a range of public opinion data, this paper explains why traditional gender stereotypes, biased social norms, and unequal family responsibilities may hold women back from full political participation. Keywords: gender reforms, party pragmatism, plurality party bloc vote, multi-member constituencies, ethnic quotas, PAP, Singapore DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5509/2016892369 ____________________ Netina Tan is an assistant professor of political science at McMaster University. -
The Rule of Law and Urban Development
The Rule of Law and Urban Development The transformation of Singapore from a struggling, poor country into one of the most affluent nations in the world—within a single generation—has often been touted as an “economic miracle”. The vision and pragmatism shown by its leaders has been key, as has its STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS notable political stability. What has been less celebrated, however, while being no less critical to Singapore’s urban development, is the country’s application of the rule of law. The rule of law has been fundamental to Singapore’s success. The Rule of Law and Urban Development gives an overview of the role played by the rule of law in Singapore’s urban development over the past 54 years since independence. It covers the key principles that characterise Singapore’s application of the rule of law, and reveals deep insights from several of the country’s eminent urban pioneers, leaders and experts. It also looks at what ongoing and future The Rule of Law and Urban Development The Rule of Law developments may mean for the rule of law in Singapore. The Rule of Law “ Singapore is a nation which is based wholly on the Rule of Law. It is clear and practical laws and the effective observance and enforcement and Urban Development of these laws which provide the foundation for our economic and social development. It is the certainty which an environment based on the Rule of Law generates which gives our people, as well as many MNCs and other foreign investors, the confidence to invest in our physical, industrial as well as social infrastructure. -
FITTING-OUT MANUAL for Commercial Occupiers
FITTING-OUT MANUAL for Commercial Occupiers SMRT PROPERTIES SMRT Investments Pte Ltd 251 North Bridge Road Singapore 179102 Tel : 65 6331 1000 Fax : 65 6337 5110 www.smrt.com.sg While every reasonable care has been taken to provide the information in this Fitting-Out Manual, we make no representation whatsoever on the accuracy of the information contained which is subject to change without prior notice. We reserve the right to make amendments to this Fitting-Out Manual from time to time as necessary. We accept no responsibility and/or liability whatsoever for any reliance on the information herein and/or damage howsoever occasioned. 09/2013 (Ver 3.9) Fitting Out Manual SMRT Properties To our Valued Customer, a warm welcome to you! This Fitting-Out Manual is specially prepared for you, our Valued Customer, to provide general guidelines for you, your appointed consultants and contractors when fitting-out your premises at any of our Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) or Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations. This Fitting-Out Manual serves as a guide only. Your proposed plans and works will be subjected to the approval of SMRT and the relevant authorities. We strongly encourage you to read this document before you plan your fitting-out works. Do share this document with your consultants and contractors. While reasonable care has been taken to prepare this Fitting-Out Manual, we reserve the right to amend its contents from time to time without prior notice. If you have any questions, please feel free to approach any of our Management staff. We will be pleased to assist you. -
Folio No: DM.086 Folio Title: Press Releases Content Description: Press Releases, Speeches, Correspondences and Radio Transcripts
Folio No: DM.086 Folio Title: Press Releases Content Description: Press releases, speeches, correspondences and radio transcripts. Includes copy of correspondences with Lee Kuan Yew on citizenship and finance, letter to Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra on merger and citizenship, submissions on the opinion made by KM Byrne on the allegations of Dr Goh Keng Swee on David Marshall as Chief Minister, correspondence with Lee Kuan Yew re: infiltration of Communists in the Workers' Party and speech of Lee Kuan Yew before the UN Committee on Colonialism ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS First Report to Anson of your Assemblyman David DM.086.001 30/7/1961 Digitized Open Marshall at a Public Meeting on 30 Jul 1961 Copies of correspondence between the Chairman of DM.086.002 7/12/1961 Workers' Party and the Prime Minister re: questions Digitized Open raised on citizenship and finance in the White Paper Copy of letter from the Prime Minister with further DM.086.003 16/12/1961 Digitized Open clarification on DM.86.2 Workers' Party Mass Rally: Second Report to Anson by DM.086.004 17/12/1961 Digitized Open David Marshall, Chairman Letter to Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra giving opinion of Singapore's hardening attitude against the White Paper proposals with a suggestion on how to make it more DM.086.005 19/12/1961 Digitized Open acceptable, and request to meet up to discuss this suggestion which has been made to the Prime Minister of Singapore Press release of a letter from the Workers' Party to Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra, enclosing -
Merdeka Generation Package $100 Top-Up Benefit
Merdeka Generation Package $100 Top-Up Benefit The Merdeka Generation (MG) One-Time $100 Top-Up will be available from 01 July 2019 onwards. Apart from the top-up locations at the MRT stations and bus interchanges, temporary top-up booths at selected Community Clubs/ Centres will be set up to provide even greater convenience to our MGs with their top ups. a) TransitLink Ticket Offices Operating Hours TransitLink Ticket Offices Public Location Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Holidays 1 Aljunied MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 Closed 2 Ang Mo Kio MRT Station 0800 - 2100 3 Bayfront MRT Station (CCL)* Closed 1200 - 2000 4 Bedok Bus Interchange 1000 - 2000 1000 - 1700 Closed 5 Bedok MRT Station * 1200 - 2000 6 Bishan MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 Closed 7 Boon Lay Bus Interchange 0800 - 2100 8 Bugis MRT Station 1000 - 2100 9 Bukit Batok MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 10 Bukit Merah Bus Interchange * 1200 - 1930 11 Changi Airport MRT Station ~ 0800 - 2100 12 Chinatown MRT Station ~@ 0800 - 2100 13 City Hall MRT Station 0900 - 2100 14 Clementi MRT Station 0800 - 2100 15 Eunos MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 1200 - 1800 Closed 16 Farrer Park MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 17 HarbourFront MRT Station ~ 0800 - 2100 Updated as of 2 July 2019 Operating Hours TransitLink Ticket Offices Public Location Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Holidays 18 Hougang MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 19 Jurong East MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 20 Kranji MRT Station * 1230 - 1930 # 1230 - 1930 ## Closed## 21 Lakeside MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 22 Lavender MRT Station * 1200 - 1930 Closed 23 Novena MRT Station -
60 Years of National Development in Singapore
1 GROUND BREAKING 60 Years of National Development in Singapore PROJECT LEADS RESEARCH & EDITING DESIGN Acknowledgements Joanna Tan Alvin Pang Sylvia Sin David Ee Stewart Tan PRINTING This book incorporates contributions Amit Prakash ADVISERS Dominie Press Alvin Chua from MND Family agencies, including: Khoo Teng Chye Pearlwin Koh Lee Kwong Weng Ling Shuyi Michael Koh Nicholas Oh Board of Architects Ong Jie Hui Raynold Toh Building and Construction Authority Michelle Zhu Council for Estate Agencies Housing & Development Board National Parks Board For enquiries, please contact: Professional Engineers Board The Centre for Liveable Cities Urban Redevelopment Authority T +65 6645 9560 E [email protected] Printed on Innotech, an FSC® paper made from 100% virgin pulp. First published in 2019 © 2019 Ministry of National Development Singapore All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Every effort has been made to trace all sources and copyright holders of news articles, figures and information in this book before publication. If any have been inadvertently overlooked, MND will ensure that full credit is given at the earliest opportunity. ISBN 978-981-14-3208-8 (print) ISBN 978-981-14-3209-5 (e-version) Cover image View from the rooftop of the Ministry of National Development building, illustrating various stages in Singapore’s urban development: conserved traditional shophouses (foreground), HDB blocks at Tanjong Pagar Plaza (centre), modern-day public housing development Pinnacle@Duxton (centre back), and commercial buildings (left). -
Caring for Our People: 50 Years of Healthcare in Singapore
Caring for our People Prime Minister’s Message Good health is important for individuals, for families, and for our society. It is the foundation for our people’s vitality and optimism, and a reflection of our nation’s prosperity and success. A healthy community is also a happy one. Singapore has developed our own system for providing quality healthcare to all. Learning from other countries and taking advantage of a young population, we invested in preventive health, new healthcare facilities and developing our healthcare workforce. We designed a unique financing system, where individuals receive state subsidies for public healthcare but at the same time can draw upon the 3Ms – Medisave, MediShield and Medifund – to pay for their healthcare needs. As responsible members of society, each of us has to save for our own healthcare needs, pay our share of the cost, and make good and sensible decisions about using healthcare services. Our healthcare outcomes are among the best in the world. Average life expectancy is now 83 years, compared with 65 years in 1965. The infant mortality rate is 2 per 1,000 live births, down from 26 per 1,000 live births 50 years ago. This book is dedicated to all those in the Government policies have adapted to the times. We started by focusing on sanitation and public health and went on healthcare sector who laid the foundations to develop primary, secondary and tertiary health services. In recent years, we have enhanced government subsidies of a healthy nation in the years gone by, substantially to ensure that healthcare remains affordable. -
PRESS RELEASE Media Division, Ministry of Information & the Arts, 36Th Storey
Singapore Government PRESS RELEASE Media Division, Ministry of Information & The Arts, 36th Storey. PSA Building, 460 Alexandra Road, Singapore 0511. Tel 2799794/5 Embargoed Until After Delivery Please Check Against Delivery SPEECH BY PRIME MINISTER IN PARLIAMENT ON TUESDAY. 18 JAN 94 Review of 1993 I look back on 1993 with some satisfaction. Our economy grew strongly. It was the best performance since 1988. 2 We also put in place policies which will sustain our robust growth - going regional, tax reform through the GST, autonomous schools, health care reform, and raising retirement age to 60. 3 We introduced practical schemes to increase Singaporeans' assets - upgrading HDB flats, selling HDB shops to create a new class of commercial property owners, the CPF Share Top-up Scheme, selling Singapore Telecom Group 'A' shares to make Singapore a nation of share-owners. 4 The upgrading of HDB flats and sale of HDB shops are one-off programmes: the recipients benefit only once, although the programmes will be stretched out over a number of years. In contrast, the CPF Share Top-up Scheme and the sale of shares of privatised statutory boards will benefit Singaporeans each time the economy does exceptionally well, and each time we privatise another statutory board. 5 We will periodically top-up Singaporeans' CPF accounts, provided we enjoy good growth and exceptional budget surplus. This will achieve two objectives: one, increase the assets of Singaporeans, and two, bring home the message that our individual prosperity is linked to the collective prosperity of the nation. If all of us work together to increase the wealth of the country, a portion of it will be redistributed to the people in the form of CPF Top-up or shares sold at a discount. -
Michael Green QC, Fountain Court
Finance, Property and Business Litigation in a Changing World 25-26 April 2013 Supreme Court Auditorium Organisers: Finance, Property and Business Litigation in a Changing World Plenary Session 1: Finance Litigation Chairperson Mr Alvin Yeo SC , WongPartnership LLP Speakers Ms Geraldine Andrews QC, Essex Court Chambers Mr Peter de Verneuil Smith, 3Verulam Buildings Mr Hri Kumar Nair SC, Drew & Napier LLC FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES LITIGATION Geraldine Andrews Q.C. Essex Court Chambers The 2008 financial crisis Sept-Oct 2008 – the eye of the storm • 7th Sept - Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae effectively nationalized by US Government. • 14th Sept - Merrill Lynch shotgun wedding to Bank of America amidst fears of liquidity crisis • 15th Sept - Lehman Bros filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection. Periodically thereafter various of its subsidiaries did the same, including, on 3 Oct, LBSF, the dedicated subsidiary for derivative transactions. • 17th Sept - AIG, the USA䇻s largest insurer, was bailed out by US Govt with a loan of $85bn (insufficient funds to meet its CDS insurance obligations) Geraldine Andrews QC, Essex Court Chambers FINANCE, PROPERTY AND BUSINESS LITIGATION IN A CHANGING WORLD Sept-Oct 2008 – the eye of the storm • 17th Sept – Lloyds TSB takes over HBOS following a run on HBOS shares • 25th Sept – Washington Mutual sold to JP Morgan Chase for $1.9bn. • 3 Oct – US Congress approves 700bn bailout of the banks – the biggest financial rescue in US history. • 6-10 Oct - The worst week for the global stock market for 75 years. The Dow Jones index lost 22.1%, its worst week on record. Geraldine Andrews QC, Essex Court Chambers FINANCE, PROPERTY AND BUSINESS LITIGATION IN A CHANGING WORLD Sept-Oct 2008 – the eye of the storm • 7 Oct - Icelandic banking system collapses • 11 Oct Highest volatility day recorded in the 112 year history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. -
Parliamentary Elections Act (Chapter 218)
FRIDAY, JUNE 9, 2006 1 First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 8th June 2006 at 5.00 pm. No. 1432 — PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS ACT (CHAPTER 218) NOTICE UNDER SECTION 75 Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 75 of the Parliamentary Elections Act, that the returns respecting the election expenses and their accompanying statements in connection with the contested parliamentary elections held on 6 May 2006 were received from the election agents of the candidates whose names are set out in the first column of the Schedule on the dates set out in the second column thereof. The returns and statements may be inspected at the office of the Returning Officer, 11 Prinsep Link, Singapore 187949, during office hours on any working day during the period of 6 months from the date of the publication of this Notice. THE SCHEDULE First column Second column 1. Ling How Doong 18 May 2006 2. Steve Chia Kiah Hong 24 May 2006 3. Chiam See Tong 27 May 2006 4. Mohamed Isa B Abdul Aziz 29 May 2006 5. Sin Kek Tong 29 May 2006 6. Yong Chu Leong 29 May 2006 7. Chee Siok Chin 30 May 2006 8. Sng Choon Guan 30 May 2006 9. Abdul Salim Bin Harun 31 May 2006 10. Chan Soo Sen 31 May 2006 11. Cynthia Phua Siok Gek 31 May 2006 12. Denise Phua Lay Peng 31 May 2006 13. Eric Low Siak Meng 31 May 2006 14. Fong Chin Leong 31 May 2006 15. Gan Kim Yong 31 May 2006 16. George Yong-Boon Yeo 31 May 2006 17. -
Speech by Minister Grace Fu on Population White Paper at the Parliamentary Debate
Speech by Minister Grace Fu on Population White Paper at the Parliamentary Debate Sustaining a Strong Singaporean Core Introduction Madam Speaker, many members before me have spoken from the heart about the concerns expressed by Singaporeans. Do we need to have so many immigrants? Are we getting the right immigrants? Can they be integrated into our society? I would like to address these concerns. I will focus on the need to sustain a strong Singaporean core, and how we will work towards achieving this. Our Demographic Challenge Last month, I visited an Elder Care Centre and met a lady there. She described her family to me. She has 6 children. Of the 6, 4 are married and 2 have remained single. The four married children gave her 5 grandchildren. So from large families of 6 children just a generation ago, more are remaining single, and those that are getting married are having significantly fewer children. This is quite typical amongst families in Singapore and reflects our marriage and parenthood trends, and the demographic challenge of Singapore. The demographic challenge of Singapore in my mind is an outcome of our fertility issues of yesteryear, before we became an independent country. We had a baby boom and this is where we will see a silver tsunaimi hitting us. To illustrate why we need to address this demographic challenge, I would like to introduce you to the Ng family. Mr Ng is 43 and his wife Mrs Ng is 40. The 2 of them have 6 siblings in total. The couple have 2 daughters. -
1—Singapore Communitarianism and the Case for Conserving 377A
Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2008] 347–394 “DON’T EVER TAKE A FENCE DOWN UNTIL YOU KNOW THE REASON IT WAS PUT UP”1—SINGAPORE COMMUNITARIANISM AND THE CASE FOR CONSERVING 377A Yvonne C. L. Lee∗ A rare parliamentary petition which sought the repeal of section 377A of the Penal Code that criminalises acts of gross indecency between male adults, was presented and debated in Parliament in October 2007. This article critically examines the constitutional law dimension and issues in relation to the 377A debate in Singapore. It highlights the primary jurisprudential thrust of the competing arguments and assumptions. It advances and defends the communitarian case for preserving 377A which the author argues is both normatively desirable and empirically reflective of existing Singapore law and policy. With particular regard to the Singapore context, it reflects on how democratic societies should address questions of law and profound moral disagreement, the importance of civil debate, and whether the legislative or judicial forum is most appropriate for making decisions on morally controversial questions. I. 377A: The Hart-Devlin Debate Redux For only the second time in Singapore history,2 a petition was presented to Parliament on 22 October 2007, by a nominated Member of Parliament (‘MP’)3 calling for the repeal of section 377A of the Penal Code4 (‘377A’). This prohibits all acts of gross indecency, such as homosexual sodomy, in public or private, between two adult ∗ LL.M. (Michigan), LL.B. (NUS); Attorney & Counsellor (New York State), Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore); Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore. I thank several colleagues for our lively exchanges on this issue.