DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NATIONAL YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT AWARD ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Today's Youth, Tomorrow's Leaders CONTENT Page Executive Summary 1 Mission 2 Policies 2 Policy Relating to Management and Conflict of Interest 4 Future Plans 4 Review of The Year 2020 5 Review of Financial Status 6 Governance Evaluation Checklist 6 Appendix 1: Organisation Structure 8 Appendix 2: NYAA Advisory Board 9 Appendix 3: NYAA National Council 12 Appendix 4: NYAA Board of Trustees 15 Appendix 5: NYAA Operating Partners 16 Appendix 6: NYAA New Participants and Awards Awarded 21 Appendix 7: Summary of Financial Performance for 2020 22 Appendix 8: Online Financial Summary for 2018 to 2020 23 Appendix 9: Donations for 2020 25 Appendix 10: Valuation Report on Investment Property 26 Appendix 11: National Council Meetings Attendance 27 Appendix 12: Chairman’s Report for 2020 29 Appendix 13: Executive Director’s Report for 2020 32 Our Work: Programmes and Activities NATIONAL YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT AWARD ASSOCIATION ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The National Youth Achievement Award Association was registered on 12 September 1991 under the Societies Act. The Association was approved as a Charity on 12 October 1991. ROS Registration Number: ROS 238/91 UEN No: S91SS0104L Charity Registration Number: 000840 IPC Registration No: 000721 Registered address: 151 Lorong Chuan #06-01B (Lobby A) New Tech Park Singapore 556741 INTRODUCTION The National Youth Achievement Award (NYAA) was officially launched on 9 May 1992 by the President of the Republic of Singapore at the Istana. ADVISORY BOARD The NYAA Council is advised by an Advisory Board chaired by Mr Heng Swee Keat, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance. (Please see Appendix 2) NATIONAL COUNCIL The Award Scheme is managed by a National Council chaired by Mr John Ting Kang Chung, Principal Architect, AIM Associates and an Award Secretariat headed by an Executive Director, Mr James Soh. (Please see Appendix 3) BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chairman: Mr Guy Harvey-Samuel (Please see Appendix 4) INSTITUTION OF PUBLIC CHARACTER The National Youth Achievement Award Association was approved as an institution of public character (IPC) under section 37 (2) (c) of the Income Tax Act since 1992. All donations to the National Youth Achievement Award Association are tax-deductible. BANKERS The DBS Bank Ltd HSBC AUDITORS PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 1 MISSION The aims of the Association are: • To encourage young people between the ages of 13 and 30 years to develop personal qualities of self-reliance, perseverance, and a sense of responsibility to themselves, society, and the nation. • To promote and present to the young people of Singapore a balanced, non-competitive programme that encourages self-development to the maximum without regard to gender, race, religion or physical impediment. POLICIES Finance and Funding The NYAA Association is a self-supportive, not-for-profit organisation. Our major donor is The Toteboard, and Singapore Pools Pte Ltd. Funding comes from corporate, foundation and public donations. The Association also collects nominal registration fees from the young people who participate in the NYAA Programme (Bronze: S$7.00, Silver: S$12.00 and Gold: S$17.00). Participation in the NYAA Programme The National Youth Achievement Award (NYAA) Youth Leadership Development Programme is an exciting self-development programme for young people between 13 and 30. It is a holistic, balanced and non-competitive programme of voluntary leisure time activities designed to provide our young people with a platform to develop personal qualities and skills to make a difference to themselves, their communities and the world. The new NYAA programme is designed in line with the Ministry of Education's Levels of Attainment, focusing on the effort and merit of the individual. There are three levels in the NYAA Programme: Bronze Level: For those who are 13 and under 30 years old A minimum period of involvement: 6 months Silver Level: For those who are 15 and under 30 years old A minimum period of involvement: 12 months Gold Level: For those who are 16 and under 30 years old A minimum period of involvement: 18 months The NYAA Programme has three key components, which all participants are required to complete, namely: Service Learning (Touching Lives, Making a Difference) This component recognises young people's development as socially responsible citizens who understand the issues faced by the community and explore how they can contribute actively to find a solution. They can choose to undertake a Values-In-Action project or any community service projects of their interest. 2 Objective: To learn how to give helpful service to others in the community and understand the meaning behind voluntary service. Bronze: At least 20 hours of regular activities spread over a minimum period of 4 months. Silver: At least 40 hours of regular activities spread over a minimum period of 8 months. Gold: At least 60 hours of regular activities spread over a minimum period of 12 months. Outdoor Appreciation (To be at Ease with Nature) Outdoor learning supports confidence-building as young people are placed in unfamiliar environments outside of the classroom. It also develops young people's problem-solving skills, enhances teamwork, strengthens understanding of the natural environment, and teaches young people a sense of stewardship for our environment. Objective: To be at ease with nature and develop stewardship for our environment. Bronze: At least 15 hours of outdoor activities with a specific learning goal. Silver: At least 24 hours of outdoor activities with a specific learning goal. Gold: At least 36 hours of outdoor activities with a specific learning goal. Healthy Living (Physical & Mental Wellness) Healthy living aims to develop and maintain a healthy lifestyle that allows us to get through our daily activities. It also hopes to develop a healthy body and mind. Our behaviour has a significant impact on our wellness. Adopting healthy habits with a balanced diet and exercise while avoiding destructive habits such as tobacco, drugs, and alcohol will improve our physical and emotional well-being. Objective: To develop physical and mental wellness through healthy living Bronze: At least 24 hours of regular activities spread over six months. Silver: At least 32 hours of regular activities spread over twelve months. Gold: At least 48 hours of regular activities spread over eighteen months. For Gold Level Only For the NYAA Gold Level, participants must undertake the fourth component: Community Leadership Initiative (Creating an Impact, Delivering Change) This component challenges participants to take on leadership roles in their community service projects. Participants are to identify a need in our community, and through the understanding of cultural differences, find solutions to contribute effectively to bring about a positive outcome. Participants will have the opportunity to showcase their leadership skills as they work in partnership with people from various backgrounds. They need to undertake a community project that will broaden their horizons and train them into culturally sensitive, service-oriented and holistic leaders. The newly remodelled section hopes to see more student/youth-initiated activities that bring positive and meaningful contributions to the community, be it on the national or international level. 3 Objective: To build leadership skills while serving the needs of the community. The Gold Level participant can embark on the initiative individually or in small groups. POLICY RELATING TO MANAGEMENT AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Association's Constitution states that a Director should ensure he does not place himself in a position whereby, directly or indirectly, his duties or interests might conflict with his duties or interests as a Director. Disclosure of interests is required should a Director conflict with his duties and interests. He should not participate or vote on the matter. The Association has put a Conflict of Interest Policy for Staff and a Code of Ethics for Council Members. In the year 2020, there are no reports nor cases involving conflicts of interest among council members or staff. However, should there be any issues, members and staff must declare their interest and abstain from decision-making related to the case. Issues and processes relating to management and hiring of staff are open and transparent. The NYAA advertised the job vacancies in internet portals such as Jobstreet, JobsDB Linkined and Indeed. Matters relating to remunerations, increments and bonuses are set and decided by the Finance Committee chaired by Dr Ken Ong and Council Members of the National Youth Achievement Award, chaired by Mr John Ting Kang Chung, Chairman of the NYAA National Council. FUTURE PLANS Leveraging on Technology for NYAA Mobile Apps & Activities The NYAA has developed an online registration system and recording activities through mobile apps for Award participants, moving away from the original traditional recording system on printed materials. Award participants will be able to record their NYAA journey through mobile apps. As a result, we will see a reduced workload, increased accessibility and more effective facilitation for teachers coordinating the NYAA Programme in schools and the NYAA Secretariat. In addition, the mobile apps will allow the participant to take responsibility and monitor their progress on the spot. Finally, the current COVID-19 pandemic will allow participants to use technology to participate in the NYAA programme at their own time and pace. The NYAA also embarked on a leadership development programme to prepare young people for the future's ever-changing and diverse job market. These programmes include leadership training workshops, elevator pitches, and presentation skills usually not covered through books and syllabuses. Programmes aim to guide participants to grow and develop through exposure and hands-on experience. These skills will help prepare our young people to be more confident and sensitive in dealing with the community and their workplace. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all activities and training programmes have been on hold or conducted virtually.
Recommended publications
  • Mr S Iswaran, Minister of State for Trade and Industry, at The

    Mr S Iswaran, Minister of State for Trade and Industry, at The

    Mr S Iswaran, Minister of State for Trade and Industry, at the Committee of Supply Debate (Ministry of Trade and Industry) on Monday, 3 March 2008, 1.00pm, in reply to cuts (k) to (o) under Head V INTRODUCTION 1. Mr Chairman, my Minister has elaborated on our overall strategy for growing the Singapore economy. While we have done well in recent years, we must continue to pursue new growth areas and opportunities. As several members have pointed out, we must ascend the value chain into higher value- added activities in all sectors including the energy, tourism, and R&D. Indeed, this is the most robust strategy to ensure sustained growth, create good quality jobs for Singaporeans, and help us face the many challenges that lie ahead for our economy and country. ENERGY FOR GROWTH 2. Energy is a critical resource for any economy including ours. Our aim is to ensure that we have secure energy supplies at competitive prices while we stay true and sensitive to our environment. The simple truth is that we may have now entered an era of higher global energy prices, a structural shift, as Mr Liang Eng Hwa has pointed out. The global demand for energy will increase and the supply constraints are self-evident. 3. At last year’s COS, I spoke of the formation of an inter-agency Energy Policy Group chaired by the Ministry of Trade and Industry. Since then, we have launched our first National Energy Policy Report. The title of this report - “Energy For Growth” - succinctly articulates the Government’s thinking and highlights the triangle of tensions that we face between Economic Competitiveness, Environmental Sustainability and Energy Security.
  • Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan

    Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan

    Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan Abstract In Singapore, the percentage of elected female politicians rose from 3.8 percent in 1984 to 22.5 percent after the 2015 general election. After years of exclusion, why were gender reforms adopted and how did they lead to more women in political office? Unlike South Korea and Taiwan, this paper shows that in Singapore party pragmatism rather than international diffusion of gender equality norms, feminist lobbying, or rival party pressures drove gender reforms. It is argued that the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) strategic and electoral calculations to maintain hegemonic rule drove its policy u-turn to nominate an average of about 17.6 percent female candidates in the last three elections. Similar to the PAP’s bid to capture women voters in the 1959 elections, it had to alter its patriarchal, conservative image to appeal to the younger, progressive electorate in the 2000s. Additionally, Singapore’s electoral system that includes multi-member constituencies based on plurality party bloc vote rule also makes it easier to include women and diversify the party slate. But despite the strategic and electoral incentives, a gender gap remains. Drawing from a range of public opinion data, this paper explains why traditional gender stereotypes, biased social norms, and unequal family responsibilities may hold women back from full political participation. Keywords: gender reforms, party pragmatism, plurality party bloc vote, multi-member constituencies, ethnic quotas, PAP, Singapore DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5509/2016892369 ____________________ Netina Tan is an assistant professor of political science at McMaster University.
  • The Rule of Law and Urban Development

    The Rule of Law and Urban Development

    The Rule of Law and Urban Development The transformation of Singapore from a struggling, poor country into one of the most affluent nations in the world—within a single generation—has often been touted as an “economic miracle”. The vision and pragmatism shown by its leaders has been key, as has its STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS notable political stability. What has been less celebrated, however, while being no less critical to Singapore’s urban development, is the country’s application of the rule of law. The rule of law has been fundamental to Singapore’s success. The Rule of Law and Urban Development gives an overview of the role played by the rule of law in Singapore’s urban development over the past 54 years since independence. It covers the key principles that characterise Singapore’s application of the rule of law, and reveals deep insights from several of the country’s eminent urban pioneers, leaders and experts. It also looks at what ongoing and future The Rule of Law and Urban Development The Rule of Law developments may mean for the rule of law in Singapore. The Rule of Law “ Singapore is a nation which is based wholly on the Rule of Law. It is clear and practical laws and the effective observance and enforcement and Urban Development of these laws which provide the foundation for our economic and social development. It is the certainty which an environment based on the Rule of Law generates which gives our people, as well as many MNCs and other foreign investors, the confidence to invest in our physical, industrial as well as social infrastructure.
  • Inward 347 Documents 348 Homily

    Inward 347 Documents 348 Homily

    BIBLIOGRAPHY LIST OF CONTENTS Page BOOKS AND ARTICLES 311 CONCERT 347 CORRESPONDENCE - INWARD 347 DOCUMENTS 348 HOMILY 351 INTERVIEWS 351 LECTURES 354 MEETINGS 354 BOOKS AND ARTICLES A Pilgrim's Testament: The Memoirs of Ignatius of Loyola (1983) Divarkar, P. (Trans.) Rome, Gregorian University. Abbott, W. (Ed.) (1966) The Documents of Vatican II, London, Chapman. Abbs, P. (1974) Autobiography in Education, London, Heinemann. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S. and Turner, B., (1988) Dictionary of Sociology, London, Penguin. Accardi, R. (1989) 'Corporate Prophetability: The Prophetic Role of the Governance Liaison', Review for Religious, 48, 6, November - December, pp.915-921. Adelman, C. (Ed.) (1981) Uttering, Muttering Collecting, Using and Reporting Talk for Social and Educational Research, London, Grant McIntyre. Adelman, C., Jenkins, D., and Kemmis, S. (1980) 'Rethinking Case Study: Notes from the Second Cambridge Conference' in Simons, H (Ed.) (1980) Towards a Science of the Singular, University of East Anglia, Centre for Applied Research in Education, Occasional Publication No. 10. Adie, M. (1990a) 'Restoring responsibility', Education, 176, 24, 14th December. Adie, M. (1990b) 'Basic or marginal?', Education, 176, 25/26, 21st/28th December. Albrow, M. (1970) Bureaucracy Key Concepts in Political Science, London, Macmillan. Albrow, M. (1990) Max Weber's Construction of Social Theory, London, Macmillan. Aldrich, R. (1982) An Introduction to the History of Education, London, Hodder and Stoughton. Alexander, D. (1991) 'Curriculum turmoil in liberal democracies', Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 1, pp.71-78. Allan, R. and Hill, R. (1991) 'Political Illiteracy and Australian Teacher Education Programmes', Social Science Teacher, 20, 3, Summer, pp.87- 89. Allen, R.
  • Group Name of School Name of Leader Grade A4 Catholic High

    Group Name of School Name of Leader Grade A4 Catholic High

    Group Name of School Name of Participants Name of Leader Grade Koe Yunji Ahmad Ibrahim A1 Divakaran Manushri Bronze Secondary School Alicia Chian See En Anderson Secondary Toh Sze Min A2 Xie Yu Zheng COC School Kamma Chavala Sri Nikesh Li XuKai Anderson Secondary A3 Joshua Tan Choon Long COC School Rodney Wang Jun Long Lee Hong DIng A4 Catholic High School Tan Jen Kai Lucas Loh Gold Wong Liyang CHIJ St Nicholas A5 Zai Si En Grace COC Girls' School Yeo Cheng Yee, Nicole Koh Tzee Yen CHIJ St Nicholas A6 Koh Ziyi, Geraldine Koh Jun Ning COP Girls' School Kyi Cin Thet Jeryl Chwa Fong Rong Holy Innocents' A7 Toh Lin, Jolin Ng Chee Kiang Gold High School Tan Zheng Jie Nicholas Dave Adelaide Nicole Mahidol Wittayanusorn A8 Miss Pemika Teeranate Silver School Mahidol Wittayanusorn Miss Patchariya A9 Gold School Chawalitjinda Tammy Lim Pasir Ris Crest A10 Sarah Ann Goh Wen Yu Chiranjeeb Satpathy COP Secondary School Amarambedu Ramesh Princess Chulabhorn’s A11 Science High School Natnicha Pichai COC Chiang Rai, Thailand School of Science and Nadrah Nabiha Binte Mohd A12 Technology, Singapore Fairus Goh Ann Kyee Bronze Zowie Ong Zu Yi School of Science and A13 Chong Zheng Xuan Tan Sze Ian Silver Technology, Singapore St. Margaret's Anya Chia Emmanuelle Xie-En A14 Secondary COP Tan Hui Xin Julia Sudharman School Foon Yi Teng Travis Eswaran Yio Chu Kang Shreeyaa Subramanian Soukkaseum A15 COC Secondary School Wongreantong Madtika Moungkhoun Jewell Png Zi Ting Group Name of School: Name of Participants Name of Leader Grade Jessica Long Mei Yun Ahmad
  • Boys Under 15

    Boys Under 15

    Boys Under 15 Events Name YOB Team Results Boys 100m Bin Agos Sahbali, Amirul Sofian 97 Singapore Sports School 12.09 Boys 100m Moh, Shaun 97 Dunman High School 12.11 Boys 100m Bin Anuar, Zuhairi 97 Singapore Sports School 12.17 Boys 100m Sugita Tadayoshi, Richmond 97 Singapore Sports School 12.2 Boys 100m Lew, Jonathon 97 Raffles Institution 12.23 Boys 100m Kang, Yee Cher 98 Singapore Sports School 12.25 Boys 100m Ng, Kee Hsien 97 Hwa Chong Institution 12.25 Boys 100m Lee, Song Wei, Lucas 97 Singapore Sports School 12.36 Boys 100m Poy, Ian 97 Raffles Institution 12.37 Boys 100m Bin Abdul Wahid, Muhammad Syazani 98 Singapore Sports School 12.44 Boys 100m Toh, Jeremy 97 Anglo Chinese Sch Independant 12.51 Boys 100m Bin Fairuz, Rayhan 98 Singapore Sports School 12.63 Boys 100m Thia, Aven 97 Victoria School 12.63 Boys 100m Tan, Chin Kean 97 Catholic High School 12.66 Boys 100m Bin Norzaha, Muhammad Shahrieza 98 Singapore Sports School 12.72 Boys 100m Chen, Ryan Shane 98 Victoria School 12.73 Boys 200m Ong, Xin Yao 97 Chung Cheng High School (Main) 24.91 Boys 200m Sugita Tadayoshi, Richmond 97 Singapore Sports School 25.18 Boys 200m Kee, Damien 97 Raffles Institution 25.23 Boys 200m Kang, Yee Cher 98 Singapore Sports School 25.25 Boys 200m Lew, Jonathon 97 Raffles Institution 25.26 Boys 200m Bin Agos Sahbali, Amirul Sofian 97 Singapore Sports School 25.50 Boys 200m Bin Norzaha, Muhammad Shahrieza 98 Singapore Sports School 25.71 Boys 200m Bin Anuar, Zuhairi 97 Singapore Sports School 25.72 Boys 200m Toh, Jeremy 97 Anglo Chinese Sch Independant
  • S/N MOE Schools 1 Admiralty Primary School 2 Admiralty Secondary School 3 Ahmad Ibrahim Primary School 4 Ahmad Ibrahim Second

    S/N MOE Schools 1 Admiralty Primary School 2 Admiralty Secondary School 3 Ahmad Ibrahim Primary School 4 Ahmad Ibrahim Second

    S/N MOE Schools 1 Admiralty Primary School 2 Admiralty Secondary School 3 Ahmad Ibrahim Primary School 4 Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary School 1 Ai Tong School 2 Alexandra Primary School 3 Anchor Green Primary School 4 Anderson Primary School 5 Anderson Secondary School 6 Anderson Serangoon JC 7 Ang Mo Kio Primary School 8 Ang Mo Kio Secondary School 9 Anglican High (Secondary) 10 Anglo-Chinese Junior College 11 Anglo-Chinese Primary School (Barker Rd) 16 Anglo-Chinese School (Junior) 17 Anglo-Chinese Secondary School (Barker Rd) 18 Angsana Primary School 19 Assumption English School 20 Assumption Pathway School 21 Bartley Secondary School 22 Beacon Primary School 23 Beatty Secondary School 24 Bedok Green Primary School 25 Bedok Green Secondary School 26 Bedok South Secondary School 27 Bedok View Secondary School 28 Bendemeer Primary School 29 Bendemeer Secondary School 30 Blangah Rise Primary School 31 Boon Lay Garden Primary School 32 Boon Lay Secondary School 33 Bowen Secondary School 34 Broadrick Secondary School 35 Bukit Batok Secondary School 36 Bukit Merah Secondary School 37 Bukit Panjang Govt High School 38 Bukit Panjang Primary School 39 Bukit Timah Primary School 40 Bukit View Primary School 41 Bukit View Secondary School 42 Canberra Primary School 43 Canberra Secondary School 44 Canossa Catholic Primary School 45 Cantonment Primary School 46 Casuarina Primary School 47 Catholic High School (Primary) 48 Catholic High School (Secondary) 49 Catholic Junior College 50 Cedar Girls Secondary School 51 Cedar Primary School 52 Changi Coast
  • 4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM

    4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM

    Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law.
  • Major Vote Swing

    Major Vote Swing

    BT INFOGRAPHICS GE2015 Major vote swing Bukit Batok Sengkang West SMC SMC Sembawang Punggol East GRC SMC Hougang SMC Marsiling- Nee Soon Yew Tee GRC GRC Chua Chu Kang Ang Mo Kio Holland- GRC GRC Pasir Ris- Bukit Punggol GRC Hong Kah Timah North SMC GRC Aljunied Tampines Bishan- GRC GRC Toa Payoh East Coast GRC GRC West Coast Marine GRC Parade Tanjong Pagar GRC GRC Fengshan SMC MacPherson SMC Mountbatten SMC FOUR-MEMBER GRC Jurong GRC Potong Pasir SMC Chua Chu Kang Registered voters: 119,931; Pioneer Yuhua Bukit Panjang Radin Mas Jalan Besar total votes cast: 110,191; rejected votes: 2,949 SMC SMC SMC SMC SMC 76.89% 23.11% (84,731 votes) (25,460 votes) PEOPLE’S ACTION PARTY (83 SEATS) WORKERS’ PARTY (6 SEATS) PEOPLE’S PEOPLE’S ACTION PARTY POWER PARTY Gan Kim Yong Goh Meng Seng Low Yen Ling Lee Tze Shih SIX-MEMBER GRC Yee Chia Hsing Low Wai Choo Zaqy Mohamad Syafarin Sarif Ang Mo Kio Pasir Ris-Punggol 2011 winner: People’s Action Party (61.20%) Registered voters: 187,771; Registered voters: 187,396; total votes cast: 171,826; rejected votes: 4,887 total votes cast: 171,529; rejected votes: 5,310 East Coast Registered voters: 99,118; 78.63% 21.37% 72.89% 27.11% total votes cast: 90,528; rejected votes: 1,008 (135,115 votes) (36,711 votes) (125,021 votes) (46,508 votes) 60.73% 39.27% (54,981 votes) (35,547 votes) PEOPLE’S THE REFORM PEOPLE’S SINGAPORE ACTION PARTY PARTY ACTION PARTY DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE Ang Hin Kee Gilbert Goh J Puthucheary Abu Mohamed PEOPLE’S WORKERS’ Darryl David Jesse Loo Ng Chee Meng Arthero Lim ACTION PARTY PARTY Gan
  • Parliamentary Debates Singapore Official Report

    Parliamentary Debates Singapore Official Report

    Volume 94 Monday No 34 20 February 2017 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SINGAPORE OFFICIAL REPORT CONTENTS Written Answers to Questions Page 1. Increase in Number of Eligible Electorates since Last General Election (Mr Gan Thiam Poh) 1 2. Studies on Impact of Pro-Family Measures on Raising Fertility Rates (Ms Foo Mee Har) 1 3. Breakdown on Number of Foreign Domestic Workers in Singapore from 13 Source Countries (Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong) 2 4. Forensic Medical Examination for Victims of Sex Crimes (Mr Chen Show Mao) 3 5. Community Dispute Applications Received by Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals (Ms Tin Pei Ling) 4 6. Development Plans for Bedok Stadium and Bedok Sports Complex (Miss Cheryl Chan Wei Ling) 4 7. Data on Vacant or Unused Government Properties and Facilities (Ms Foo Mee Har) 5 8. Updates on New and Innovative Technologies for HDB Residents with Lift Access Problems (Assoc Prof Fatimah Lateef) 5 9. Proportion of Unsuccessful First-Time HDB BTO Flat Applicants after Fifth Attempt (Assoc Prof Fatimah Lateef) 6 10. Contamination Rate of Recyclables from Household Recycling (Mr Louis Ng Kok Kwang) 7 11. Encouraging Uptake of 'Haze-free' Cooking Oil by Restaurants (Mr Louis Ng Kok Kwang) 8 12. Reason for Rise in Littering Cases (Er Dr Lee Bee Wah) 9 13, 14, 15. Water Consumption and Forthcoming Price Increase (Er Dr Lee Bee Wah and Mr Png Eng Huat) 10 16. Primary 1 Pupil Data Form (Mr Leon Perera) 12 INCREASE IN NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE ELECTORATES SINCE LAST GENERAL ELECTION 1 Mr Gan Thiam Poh asked the Prime Minister (a) to date, what is the total increase in the number of eligible electorates since last general election; (b) which is the electoral division that has the highest number of increase; and (c) what is the projected increase in the number of eligible electorates in three years' time.
  • What Singaporean Female Politicians Choose to Say in Parliament

    What Singaporean Female Politicians Choose to Say in Parliament

    REFLEXIONEN ZU GENDER UND POLITISCHER PARTIZIPATION IN ASIEN Mirza, Naeem/Wagha, Wasim, 2010: Performance of Women Parliamentarians in the 12th Natio- nal Assembly (2002-2007). Islamabad. Musharraf, Pervez, 2006: In the Line of Fire. London. Mustafa, Zubeida, 2009: Where Were You, Dear Sisters? In: Dawn, 22.04.2009. Navarro, Julien, 2009: Les députés européens et leur rôle. Bruxelles. Phillips, Anne, 1995: The Politics of Presence. Oxford. PILDAT, 2002: Directory of the Members of the 12th National Assembly of Pakistan. Islamabad. Pitkin, Hanna F., 1967: The Concept of Representation. Berkeley. Rehfeld, Andrew, 2005: The Concept of Constituency. Political Representation, Democratic Legi- timacy, and Institutional Design. New York. Searing, Donald, 1994: Westminster’s World. Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge (Mass.). Shafqat, Saeed, 2002: Democracy and Political Transformation in Pakistan. In: Mumtaz, Soofia, Racine, Jean-Luc, Ali Imran, Anwar (eds.): Pakistan. The Contours of State and Society. Karachi, 209-235. Siddiqui, Niloufer, 2010: Gender Ideology and the Jamaat-e-Islami. In: Current Trends in Islamist Ideology. Vol. 10. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, 1988 (1985): Subaltern Studies. Deconstructing Historiography. In: Guha, Ranajit/Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (eds.). Subaltern Studies. New York, 3-32. Solberg, Kristin Elisabeth, 2010: New Laws Could Improve Women’s Health in Pakistan. In: The Lancet. 975 (9730), 1956. Special Committee on Constitutional Reform, 2010: Report. Islamabad. Talbot, Ian, 2005: Pakistan. A Modern History. London. UNDP, 2005: Political and legislative participation of women in Pakistan: Issues and perspectives. Weiss, Anita, 2001: Gendered Power Relations. Perpetuation and Renegotiation. In: Weiss Anita/ Gilani Zulfikar (eds.): Power and Civil Society in Pakistan. Oxford, 65-89. Yasin, Asim, 2007: Discord over PPP tickets for women’s seats.
  • One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan

    One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan

    One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.