4 19 of 1 Exhibit Page Exhibit 4 Page 2 of 19
The Master Plan Process PrOJect Funding
: • t: • • :
Stale holder Engagement and Public Outreach .....•.. . .. • Exhibit 4 Page 3 of 19
Exhibit 4 Page 4 of 19
1.1 Baseline CondiUons North Perry Airport HWO is located within the City of Pembroke Pines. The City of Miramar also borders the southern boundary of the Airport Medical and commercial development exists immediately west of the Airport and Broward College's Judson A. Samuels South Campus is located immediately to northeast. Residenijal development also surrounds the Airport HWO's airfield has four existing runways, consisting of two sets of parallel runways; one set In an east-west orientation, the other in a north-south orientaijon. All four runways are 100 feet wide and vary in length from 3,240 feet to 3,350 feet The airfield also includes a vast network of taxiways that provide aircraft access to tenant facilities to me norm and soutn or me a!m eld. Tne nortnwest corner of the airport is currenijy dedicated to banner towing pick-up and drop-off operaijons. Per Broward County Ordinance, HWO's airfield is restricted to aircraft weighing 12,500 pounds or less. This primarily consists of piston and turboprop aircraft, helicopters, and a very limited number ofli ght jet aircraft and airships (blimps) . As one of the busiest GA airports in the region, HWO serves a broad range of aeronautical market segments. There are numerous tenants that provide aeronautical related services.
lAgend --Airport Property Bounds!)' • GeneraiAviation Facilities • Air Traffic Control Tower
SOURCE: Qf'OW.)d Coumy Avbtlon Oep~r~mert, 2018.
4 20191MSTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRY AIRPORT- 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Exhibit 4 Page 5 of 19
El The Master Plan Process
The FAA recommends airport master plans be (ALP), which graphically depicts existing and the MPU and was completed in April 2017. The adopted for use in the HWO MPU. Furthermore, updated every five to ten years, or as necessary, proposed airport enhanceme nts, as well as a Study included information that wa; also releVant the airfield imprcwements recommended by to verify the Airport's compatibility with aviation capital imprcwement program (CIP) that will guide to the MPU, including preparation of an airport the ASEG Study were reviewed and validated industry trends and toea I area development The the incremental development of the Airport. activity forecast for HWO. Therefore, to avoid during the Master Plan Update process and AirpUIL MPU Wi::l~ t:OIIIIJIE:'~ll in i::lt:corUi::IHO::! wiU• tlupli(.;(:IUOII o f ~ ffor l::i ~l~ ll U~ASEGS tut.Jy c:nKJ The MPU for HWO began in November 2015 and the llli:Uty JJ IU~C-ls, JX:11lil.."Uli::Uiy U~ IJIUIJI.J*U ~ iwoy federal and state guidelines found in FAA AdVisory the HWO MPU, the airport activity forecasts were modifications, we1e incorporated into this MPU. airport activity forecasts were apprOI!ed by the FAA Circular 150/ 5070-68, Airport Master Plans and the in April 2017. The final technical analyses for the FOOT Guidebook for Airport Master Planning. These MPU were completed in Summer 2019. After review guidelines include the required study elements to by stakeholders and acceptance by the BOCC, the develop a comprehensive airport plan that meets final technical report and an ALP drawing set were the aviation demand for a 20+ year planning period completed in Fall 2019. in an incremental, demancl-driYen, and affordable manner. The development of the MPU was guided 2019 Master Plan Goals and Objectives by the goals and objectives illustrated on the right What are HWO's current facilities and infrastructure The MPU includes a comprehensive assessment assets? What are the existing conditions? of Airport assets. These assets include: the airfield, tenant facilities, roadWays and other What is the projected future growth for ~UIJIJO' l fcu... ili l~s, su.;l1 ~ SCAD i::ILI I I I i iJ ~lli::IUUII HWO's traffic and activity le\oels? and maintenance, and the air traffic control tower. Future airport facility and infrastructure needs are triggered by increases in aeronautical activity, tenant development initiatives, and replacement of aging Demand/ Capacity How much capacity does HWO haVe? facilities and infrastructure. To quantify future facility & Requirements Are there capacity gaps in the future? development needs and establish the sequencing of future development, airport activity forecasts How should the capacity gaps be addressed? were deriYed. The activity forecasts were submitted Alternatives Analysis to the FAA for review and approval. How can the AirpJrt be impro-.ed? The MPU also identifies on-Airport areas for potential Environmental What are the potential environmental non-aeronautical de~e lopme nt and opportunities Overview implications of tte proposed impro-.ements? to enhance the Airport's integration into the ~UHOUi llli ltgWf i iii i U ili ly. Tilt! HWO MPU (.;Uh l lirli::llf:!!) with the development of an Airport Layout Plan Capital Improvement What projects are needed to fulfill Program HWO's future needs?
Airport Layout Plan What is the future vision for HWO based 2.1 Related stu•les & Airports GIS on the MPU recommendations? HWO's last MPU was appro.oed in 2009 and aircraft from inadYertently entering the runway recommended a variety of airfield impro.rements. environment, necessitated BOlD to reevaluate The recommended airfield imprcwements were the airfield imprOYements that were recommended based on FAA airfield design standards in effect at during the previous HWO MPU. the time. In the inlerim, the FAA revised the airfield BCAD commissioned a study called an "Airfield design standards. The FAA's new airfield design Safety Enhancement and Geometry (ASEG) standards, which focused on measures to avoid Study". This study commenced concurrently with
6 2019 MAST£R PlAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT Exhibit 4 Page 6 of 19
II Future Aviation Activity Projections
Future airport activity projections provide the • Aircraft operations are defined as either a takeoff deve loped for cale ndar year (CY) 2015 through facility req uireme nts) reftec:ed the recent surge basis for determining facility requirements and or a landing on one of HWO's runways. Touch and CY 2035 (which re presents a 2Q.yea r planning in activity, an MPU Sensitivity Analysis forecast defining the type and extent of future airport go operations, which are associated with ftight horizon). The forecasts applied a compound was developed. This was achieved bY applying enhancement s. Airport activity projections training activities, are considered two operations, annual growth rate (CAGR) of 0.66 percent to the FAA approved CAGR of 0.66 perce nt to the generally focus on based aircraft and total one landing and one takeoff. Aircraft operational both based aircraft and aircraft operations. Airport's CY 2017's actual based aircraft and operations. demand leVels dictate the needs for airfield The ASEG Study forecasts were reviewed bY aircraft operational demand levels. The higher the FAA and approved April 28, 2017. forecasts associated with t he MPU's Se nsitivity • Based aircraft are aircraft th Based A ircraft Forecast Operations Forecast 500 450 400 ------= 350 300 CAGR: 0.66% "'e < 250 i 200 &I"' 150 100 50 0 calendar Year Legend Legend - Historical Based Aircraft - Historical Aircraft Operations - ASEG Study Forecas: - ASEG Study Forecast - MPU Sensitivity NOTE.: CAGR. Coq.oundAnruol Growtb Rille - fAPU Sensitivity SCllRC£S: ~A At bffioA~~(,lT~ Ml!rd'l 2018 ~~): I(Jm~ Analysis F'orecast llr'ldklsodnt-c5,Apri20U (i:eCIIIa dalot.lno.; Rloondo&~ be., l.re 2018. Analysis Forecast 8 2019 MASTtR PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRY AIRPORT - 2019 MASTtR PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Exhibit 4 Page 7 of 19 Exhibit 4 Page 8 of 19 Recommended Airport Enhancements Proposed Airfield Enhancements The MPU's Demand/ capacity Analysis identified for each functional area. The various airport not only the need for additional capacity, but other enhancement alternatives were identified and improvements, such as replacing aging infrastructure, evaluated during a series of Interactive work that will ensure the Airport recei\es the most benefit sessions. These work sessions irMJived various from additional capacity. The MPU focused on the members of BCAD's executive team, airport tenants, following functional areas for de\elopment and other key stakeholders. During these work sessions, open discussions relative to the location • Airfield and cortiguration offuture (additional) facilities • Tenant Facilities or replacement facilities were undertaken. These • Support Facilities interactwe discussions comprised the advantages, disadvantages, and tradeoffs of placing facilities at l.andside enhancements were also identified. This various sites, as well as the configurations and layout included roadway access impro.ements, enhancements for the proposed facilities, from both operational to existing on-Ailport roadways. and utility infrastructure and land usc pcrspcoti~c. The roculting preliminary to support future tenant de\elopment. recommendations were also presented to the public The planning approach was customized to meet during an open house workshop. The public workshop the unique ope Airfield Medlflcatlons Howe-.oer, the ASEG Study recommended • enhandng airfield access for future a variety of modifications to the airfield's aeronautical tenant development; pa\ement geometry and electrical system. • creating dedicated holding bays for a~\ft These modifications were intended to run-up and pre-ftight checks; and ' enhance operational safety and efficiency by implementing the following actions: • eliminating antiquated andfor excessi\oe airfield pavements. Airfield pavement geometry and safety enhancements: Airfield electrical Improvements: • mitigating potential runway incursions • installing runway guard lights at select (inadvertent encroachment of an active runway entrances; runway), including the mitigation of Hot • installing runway and taxiway edge lighting Spots 1. 2, and 3. A hot spot is defined as a and signage ; and location on an airport mO\ement area with a history of potential risk of collision or runway • replacing the airfield electrical vault Legend incursior, and where heightened attention -·-Existing Airport Property Line & Future Pavement Removal The refinements to the airfield enhancements Existing Apron and Taxiway Pavement • Future Pavement by pilots and drivers is necessary; that were recommended during the ASEG Study • Existing Buildings • ensuring compliance with current serve as tne airfield configuration upon which all • Existing Rurrway Pavement FAA design standards; other airport enhancements are built upon. 12 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRY AIRPORT- 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 Exhibit 4 Page 9 of 19 Future Tenant faclllt¥ Development Land Use Prlorttles HWO has approximately 92 acres of property available for future development. Therefore, HWO currently has more than adequate land to accommodate the 22 acres of land needed for aeronautical tenant and airport support as projected for the 20-year planning horizon. The resulting land surplus provides an opportunity for SCAD to suoplement its revenue base through either non-aeronautical development or soliciting cthe r types of aeronautical service providers that do not currently reside at the Airport. To facilitate the prioritization of future on-Airport development, a series of land use development plan options were developed and evaluated. This culminated with the identification of a Preferred Land Use Plan to guide future development Initiates at HWO. To aid In the identification of the properties best suited to accommodate the future r 14 2019 MASTIR PLAN EXECUnV£ SUMMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRYAI RPORT - 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 Exhibit 4 Page 10 of 19 Preferred Land Use Plan - North Perry Airport SiN Non-Aeroneutlcal Use Legend (Acres) Parcels that are not adjacent to the airfield are designated for non Non-Aerona1tical Development aeronautical development opportuniijes. Parcel 8 8.7 This may include, but is not limited to Subtotal 8.7 commercial, retail, or Industrial purposes. Aeronautical Oeve~pment Parcel 8 is the only parcel that does not Pa,cei1B 6.9 have airfield access, and therefore is Parcel 2 10.8 limited to nor-aeronautical development. Parcel 3 9.1 This parcel currently serves as a park ~ Parcel 7 1.8 and-ride lot for Broward County Transit, but cou ld be redeveloped for other I 1A Parcel 1N Parcel 11 4.6 Subtotal 33.2 revenue generating purposes. Surplu!I{Oemand Dllven CJ Surplus; Demand Drtven Parcel 4 6.8 Any remaining parcels that are Parcel S 15.2 contiguous to the airfield and could Parcel 6 5.8 be developed as either aeronautical or Parcel Q 3.2 non-aeronautical uses are designated Parcel12 2.9 as surplus/ demand driven. This land Subtotal 33.9 use category provides BCAD with Alrfteld Opeoatlons Alea the ability to maximize the revenue Parcei 1A (Banner Towing) 15.9 generating capability of these parcels Subtotal 15.9 by providing the flexibility to develop either aeronautical or non-ae ronautical Total for Area Development 91.7 development as development opportuniijesarise. Parcels 4, 5, 6, 9, and 12 have been designated as Legend Surplusj Demand Dri ven. ...- Existing Airport Property line • Existing Runway Pavement Existing Apron and Taxiway Pavement W'3 Future Pavement Removal • Future Apron and Teociway Pavement • Existing Buildings Aeronautical Development land Non-Aeronautical Development Land ~ Surplu!I{Oemand Driven Land • Airfield Operations Al9a ?At~KE RQ40 SOURC£S:Ameriu nlrdrowuctue Oe-.oelopment, Inc., Moy 20 18; t(lmle 16 2019 MASTER PLANEX ECUTIVESU MMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRY AIRPORT- 2019 MASTER PLANEXEC UTIVES UMMARY 17 Exhibit 4 Page 11 of 19 Support Fac1lltles for roadway access to Parcels 4 and 5 and cyclists from 'Jehicular traffic along Airport BCAD staff and stakeholders provided input of a replacement ATC tower to occur while airfield is not being recommended at this time. Road. This project would also include lighting on the airport enhancements for providing operations are controlled from the existing and landscaping impro.rements to improve the 20-year support facility and infrastructure tower. The .proposed ATC tower location would Separated Shared-Use Path the aesthetics of the Airport. The shared-use req uirements for HWD. This included the provide controllers with an unobstructed view of The frequent use of Airport Road t1J path would parallel Airport Road along the identification of aging facilities and facilities the airfield "'hile minimizing the he ight of pedestrians and cyclists has been identified north, west, and south perim~te r of the Airport. requiring expansion. The recommended airport the structure. as a safety concern. As a potential landside It should be noted that this project may be enhancements are described below: safety enhancement, the establishment of a implemented in phases, if necessary, and its time lines for impiementaUon is subject to BCAD Administration & Maintenance Facilities ~:;~~~~~~~~:~~~~ path along Airport Road ATC Tower Replacement The existing BCAO Administration and Maintenance is This would segregate pedestrians the availability of funding and FAA approval. The existing ATC tower was constructed in Facilities require an additional 2,900 square feet the 1960s. At approximately 60 years old, it of enclosed building space to accommodate the is anticipated that the facility \\ill need to be Airport's administratiotV maintenance staffing Path• replaced during the 20-year planning period. needs and materials/ equipment storage. The The replaced ATC tower is prop:JSed immediately expansion o' the BCAD facilities is proposed west of the existingATC tower location. This immediately east of the existlngAdministration location would minimize development costs by and Maintenance compound. leveraging the existing utilities and vehicular parking. It would also allow for the construction Landslde lmproven1entll East Side Access Road and UtiiH.ies are intended for the protection of pe•oPi~~~--4~1 !:::::;:::::-T To facilitate future tenant facility de\Oelopment, property wltnln Its ~~~ ~::~~~~~~ the construction of an access road and with current FAA guidance extension of utilities infrastructure is warranted. extension of Airport loact'l'i /Qifid The following a.itemati\Oe wa5 evaluated during new land use w ith•iirn~:the~.:~·~~,:~~ the MPU: would requi re the c• and mitigation study. • Extension of Airport Road Since the development of tenant on The extension of Airport Road was identified Parcels 4 and 5 is currently not imminent, • Up to 12 to 16 feet wide paved surface as SCAD's preferred option lor providing the actual type of development is not known. • l.an 18 2019 MASTIR PLAN EXECUnV£ SUMMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRYAI RPORT - 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 Exhibit 4 Page 12 of 19 Master Plan Update- 20-Year Airport Enhancements Plan (Conceptual Rendering) SOURCES: Amerieon lnfmotruo:lulle Development. .-.o.,. J.tlrf :2018; )(!~Horn end As$0Cb1lts, Inc., HWO A'lfelds,{crt£ llb.w!C~et~X"IIf W Gf:omevt Stul+f, April 2017; Rloondo & A:o~. Inc., April 2019. 2Q 2019 MAST£R PlAN EXECUTIV£ SUMMARY - NORTH P£RRYAIRPORT NORTH P£RRY AIRPORT - 2019 MASTER PlAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 21 Exhibit 4 Page 13 of 19 II Program Implementation Phasing The airport enhancements recommended as Near-Tomn (FY 2020 through FY 2024) Recommended Airport Enhancements by Phase part of the MPU will be realized through sensible 0 M~igate Hotspot 1: ModWy Taxiway Crossings :=t nd gr~d tJ;:JI ct P.VP.Iopnumt ;::tr,tio n~ nvAr timA. to Runway 10 L2 8R and 1L 10 R Each project would provide incremental benefits and may have Independent u@ty for HWO. The 0 M ~igate Hotspot 2: Modify Entrances to Ru""'ays 1l and 10 R and Construct New Ru~U p Pads sequencing and ijming of each project is d rl~~e n by a variety of f actors, such as: operational 0 Mitigate Hotspot3: Reconfigure Apron Entrance demand l e~~e l s, evoluijon of the aircraft fleet Taxilanes South of Taxiway L mix, BCAD and t enant d e~~e lopm e nt lniti ati~~es, 0 Airfield lighting Improvements funding availability, age and condition of existing facilities/infrastructure, and regulatory 0 M~igate Runway 1l-19R Crossings and Extend Taxiway A requirements. The proposed sequencing of projects has been divided into th ree phases: 0 Seperated Shared-Use Path and landscaping Along Airport Road • Near-term development is projected to occur between fiscal year (FY) 2020 through FY 2024, 0 Air Traffic Control Tower Replacement • lnte rmedlat e-term de~~e l opm e nt would occur Intermediate-Term (FY 2026 through FY 2029) between FY 2025 and FY 2029, and 0 Phase 2 Airfield lmprcwements • Long-term de~~e l opment is projected to occur BCAO Administration and I ! from FY 2030 and beyond. f) Maintenance Facility Expansion I These three phases esijmate the general period I I (irl FY~) ror futur ~ Airport iln pr ~ rn tHJls. How~w r , Lon~·Term ( FY 2030 throur;h FY 2036) I periodic re-evaluation of the proposed timing G) Phase 3 Airfield Improvements will be necessary to accommodate changing de~~e l opm e nt needs or priorities. It is also possible that other improvements not identified in this Implementation phasing may be idenijfied aeronautical de~~e l opm e nt Co ~ctl\ 22 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRY AIRPORT- 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 Exhibit 4 Page 14 of 19 II Project Funding Project funding sources include federal grants projects that receive AlP grants, FOOT has from the FAA, state grants from the FOOT, contributed up to 50 percent of the remaining and local funds from SCAD or other a$ncies. share of the project cost. For pro~cts that do It is important to note that specific project not receive AlP funding, the FOOT will provide eligibility for federal and state grant funding up to 80 percent of the funding for most non varie~~end i ng on the type of project Actual FAA-supported project costs. For economic finan~g strategies used will be determined as development projects, FOOT may provide up i m~leme ntation approaches. Typical funding to 50 perce nt of the costs to build on-Airport, 4o u r~clude: revenue producing capital improvements. Fede ral G nts- The FAA distributes federal e Local Funds -Local funds may be provided grcnts unCle.{)le Airport Improvement by SCAD or other local funding agencies for Program (AiPf to airport operators In two projects not eligible for federal or state funding waw entitlement grants and discretionary and to account for shortfalls in funding levels. grants. Entitlement grants for GA airports Local funding shares can be as little as 5 ''that are included in the NPIAS, such as percent for projects that receive a combination ~WO, are referred to as non-primary of FAA and FOOT grants or up to 100 percent entitlement grants. SCAD Is eligible to for projects not receiving federal a state receiYe up to $150,000 annually in non funds. Local funds are typically obtained from primary entitlement grants for airfield Airport revenues and are identified in the capital projects and eligible maintenance County's fiscal budgeting cycles. prc1ects. Discretionary grants are distributed The master planning process, implementation for individual projects based on funding Tenant Facility Development roadWay access, airfield access, andfor ·1itie plan, and estimated costs, coupled with availability and the priority of projects at While the need for aeronautical tenant facilities may be necessary in adVance of1:onstructlo . other projects identified by SCAD needed to airports nationwide. Projects given the is facility development, the tenants will ultimately were prioritized in consultation with CAD staff e State Grants - FOOT grants are funded frorr define the type, configuration, and timing of and stakeholders. Due to the safety benefits the State Transportation Trust Fund, which facility development within their respective to pedestrians and cyclists, the construction consists, in part, of funds collected through leaseholds. Similarly, the development of non of the shared use path along Airport Road was the state's aviation fuel tax. The FOOT grant aeronautical tenant facilities will likely be financed identified as a top priority. The replacement of program was established to fund projects by private developers. While BCAO has the ability the ATC tower is also considered a top priority, relating to airport planning and capital to limit the type of non-aeronautical facility as the existingATC tower is old and antiquated. improvements that address safety, security, or capacity improYements; land acquisition; development at the Airport, the ultimate timing of These two projects will be implemented under and economic development Historically, for non-aeronautical development and configuration the near-term CIP, while the planned expansion of faciliti e~- will be defined by others. To facilitate of the SCAD Airport Administration and tenant development on certain parcels, however, Maintenance facilities are to be implemented certain Infrastructure improYements, such as in the intermediate planning horizon. 2 4 2019 MASTtR PLAN EXECUTI\1£ SUMMARY - NORT~ PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRY~ IR PORT - 2019 MASTtR PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 5 Exhibit 4 Page 15 of 19 Total CIP: Costs developed in 20 18 U.S. dollars and escalated 3.5% annually for inflation. CIP Costs By Phase Potential Funding Breakdown l NOIU: 1Pn:lject fundlf18 olboe.tions o~ ~ on ellglbllltj erherb. Actu~~l proje<:t fl.ndlnl ohd{ or tlmlns 1, wbject to c:h=ln~. 1 S:or li-..eol ~rs encllnl September 30. 1Amoo.nts show11~re e$(01o!ited doIars (3.6 ~n:ent ann~l~ ffom 2018). 'loolol l'undslndude funcll~~&ftom the 9f'C!Wollrd CountyAvbtlon ~I'Ottment or ~riO<:~ funcl~·ncles. ' nis po;ct he~ ~need plonnl~ oncl l)d:slionol .:.ervbes.. new~ the dewlopnert of pn:.g.-deinltlen SOURCES: Arnerk:¥~1nf10.$ln.>:ture De-.oelo,:mert,lno., M=ly 2018 (M~r Pbn Cos:Utlmo~): Klmle:t-Horn onciA,!IOcbte,,lno.. j.f'N0Airlielcl Srity Enhonoe~nt~ndGeomeuy Sludj. AP'il2017: Rl:onclo &A~Qdotet.. lno.. AP'il2019. NORTH PERRY AIRPORT- 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUr.'MARY 2 7 Exhibit 4 Page 16 of 19 II Environmental Overview The Environmental 0-.erview summarizes analysis of enhancement alternatiYes. During Potentially Eliglbia tor Potontial for Project environmental processing considerations for the developme nt of the ASEG Study, the FAA Master Plan Update Projact categorical Exclusions.2.t footprinttoAffQCt Rgsource thP. rP.r.omnlP. nr1FH1 P. nhi11 nOP. mP. nt~ propo.c:P.r1 ac;. w::~~ r.on~ultP.d to rP.ViP.w t hP. &P.vP. I of NFPA Owvlopmvnl Pitrcttl:tf part of the HWO MPU. This specifically relat es evaluation required for the recommended airfield Aeronau tical Development Parcel - 18 No to the require ments in FAA Order 1050.1F, impro.rements. Based on feedback from the Aeronautical Development Parcel - 2 Yes (5-6.4.f) ••• Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, FAA, BCAD submitted documentation t o support and FAA Order 5050.4B, National Environmental categorical exclusion of airfield geometric Aeronautical Development Parcel - 3 No • ••• Policy Act (NEPA) Imple menting Instructions for impro.rement s and safety enhancements. Aeronautical Development Parcel - 7 Yes (5-6.4.e) • ••• Airport Actions. All projects that require a federal In August 20 17, the FAA dele rmined that the No •• action, including receipt of federal funding, must Aeronauti c~velopment Parcel - 10 ASEG Study's airfield geometric imprOYe ment s comply with NEPA. In addition environment al Aeronaufcal Development Parcel - 11 No • • to included in the near- and intermediate- term review of MPU projects at the federal level Surpi[.QO&mand Driven O.velopment Parcel - 4 No • • planning periods were cat egorically excluded pursuant to NEPA, projects that are funded from further NEPA review pursuant to FAA Order S rplus,IDem:s Driven Development Parcel - 5 No • •• through FOOT will require preparation of 1050.1F, paragraphs 5 6.3.b and 5 6.4.e. • •• a Stat e Environmental Impact Report. Surplus,IDeman OnVen Development Parcel - 6 No These projects, along with other MPU projects No •• ~~Demand Driven Development Parcel - 9 • The intent of an airport master plan that generally align with definitions for actions rplus,IDemand Driven Development Parcel - 12 No • •• environment al overview is to provide an that are eligible for categorical exclusion as understanding of key environmental issues long as no extraordinary circumstances exist as No •• that would likely need t o be addressed as part defined in FAA Order 1050.1F, are present ed in • •• of future environmental reviews of the MPU the table below. The resource categories that projects. The existing environment al conditions would likely require detailed review in future were identifi ed a nd documented as pa rt of envi ro n m~ n tal evaluations of HWO M PU pr~t~~ the ASEG Stuclf and then considered in the are also de picted. Lagend e Ai rQua l ~ e Cultural Resources e Water Resources (Floodplains. Biological Resources e Hazardous Materials, Solid Surface Watars, Wetlands. Waste. and Pollution Prevention and Groundwater) M ~igate Hotsp>t 1 Categorically E:J ATC Tower Rep~acerrumt No •• Separated Shared-Use Path and No • LandscapingA!ongAirport Road • 2 8 2019 MAST£R PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - NORTH PERRY AIRPORT NORTH PERRY AIRPORT - 2019 MAST£R PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 9 Exhibit 4 Page 17 of 19 • MONTHLY, Pr0j9ct Coordination with SCAD !Avelopment and Pfannmg Staff, Executrv.a Oractor Bnefings As the anticipated timing for undertaking MPU distribution systems, as described in FAA Order projects (other than those that llave already been 6850.2, Visual Guidance UghtingSystems, and categoltally excluded from further NEPA review) other related facilities. is furthEr refined through adva need pia nning a net design, lhese details shculd be reflected In :he FAA Order 1050.1F, Paragraph 5-6.4.e NEPA processing strategy. Ongoing collaboration Federal fina ncial assistance, licensing, or with the FAA regarding updates and refinerrBnts • Forecasts Appr019d (ASEG Stutty) approval for the following actions, to future project assumptions, such as timing and • Pmliminary Demand Capacity 1 Facility Requirements action would not result in significant • Proliminary land Use Plan Development anticipated impacts, will be critical to refining a erc~idin sedimentation, and will not result in a NEPA processing strategy and associated time line ~iSil i~CaJn~;.!:::~ noise increase over noise-se11sit for MPU projects. 2018 result in significant impacts • MPU Sensitivity Analysis Forecast Development FAA Order 1050.1F Policies and Procedures for • Refined Demand Gapa:ity 1 Facilrty Requirements Considering Environmental Impacts extending. • Preliminary Atternative; Applicability of Categorical Exclusion citations aconstructpron, loadii o~~~·ngire~p~;a~irt, ramp,~~~~~~~~~~~~ or ~ • Environmental 0/ervie·N • Preliminary ALP Dwelc·pment is subject to FAA review for the potential for including an RSA using extraordinary circumstances (i.e., factors or Arresting System (EMAS); or (2) circums:ances in which a normally categorically resurfacing, extending. excluded action may have a significant an existing runway. This CATEX includes marl 3Q 2019 MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - NORTH PERRYA IRPORT Exhibit 4 Page 18 of 19 m Acknowledgments Broward County Aviation Department (BCAD) Polley Advisory Committee (PAC) & Mark Gale Technical AdVIsory Committee (TAC): Chief ExecuUw OffloorjOlrector ot AvlaUon Special thanks to a II members representing the various stake holder orga ni zati ons~hat 111ade up Michael Nonnemacher the Policy and Technica l Advisory-Committees. Deputy OlrectorjAvlaUon Chief OperaUng Ottioer Your contribution to this study is greaUy Marc Gambrill appreciated. Aviation Chef Development Ottioor Nina MacPherson Consultant Team Airport Manager Rlcondo & Associates, Inc. Mike Pacltto Amer1can Infrastructure Dewlopment, lnc. Enlerprise Director of Planning Arora Engineers, Inc. William castillo Basulto Mana~ment Consultants, Inc. Airport Plarning Manager Dickey Consulting Servk:es, Inc. Karen Friedman Senior Plamer Garth Solutions, Inc. Ken Coutah Jr. Quantum Spatial, Inc. Planner 3 2 2019 MAST£R PlAN EXECunV£ SUMMARY - NORTll P£RRY AIRPORT 4 19 of 19 Exhibit Page