Forme Ler Doct Tor Awa Aits Jer< Ome He Earing '^ |
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
_______ . , r , ' ................. r Welfy■i; leaps tco NCAA titleI s X31 Eaghles finish1 in 3rd pi)/ace — E •• ,-George^ - A r n o l d of TWIn F a lls . & h Q — sold hishlspIckHjpln S .d a y s th a n k s to h lS £ S h r i n e3 f o o t b a lJiT s-News Cja§sgL«U;j-.:^^ ^ 1 i c T V - ^ J r33K)6261bdayl l l j r r r el{lT i S ~ aft^ ^ ^--------------------- i5ii55i~ V r^ rrr? -- . l i ______________________________________________ ’ copr.iahiir.iohli) IWJ QQB V«D«y•yN.w.p«p.r.ln<;. N. ' ______ 83rd year, No. 156 s ____ :_______ __ TwJ.n,in Falls, Idaho ...................S a tu r d a y , J u n e ’4 , 1 9 8 8 ________ - R e aa g a n ~ «5 t t e s ^ i $ i y < in s u m n m i t Tlie ABfiociatc’d'S•ess e ii eteppiiping off Air Force'One, his m<memo- The scene at Aj Andrews Air. Foroe andd hish w ife a s “w e ^ travelerslers,"artd Kremlin before) ai n applauding audi- tegicegic nuclear weapons. rablele 11] ,6 0 0 -miIejouTtrey a t a nt en end. __^se was as me leticulously orches- besetseem ed to lose his place oncenee while ence.of British admirere,a_c Reagan p id ____“S “Such_a ^ a ty -j^ ^ I believe, n ^ - - WASHINGTON- - President . He[e claimed, progress-on huihuman trateTas any m E Reagan’s two terms readiiiding his prepared remarksr-'-,8.----------- jjg found G orbaca^ev to be "a serious' withwithin o u r graspi“ he said; ' ' ............" f ag an 'retu iiied homeme from his Moscow rights,Its, regional conflicts and in the W hite H ouse le — a receiving line SeHe touched on many of the same man ieeking senJrious" reform ," and be- ~- HeHi made no such cloini in his brief j ^--------s u m m it-to -a -c aampaigD-sfyJe-star-—^ m j g:gible-pTogr^‘‘~ i i td w ^~ aa~ 'i 'ttetr- of dignitaries, sen iveraJ thousand fn- theme‘mes he raised several hourours ear- (ieved tho superprpowers may be enter- remc'cmarks in a hangar at Andrews Air ' spangled welcomee Friday,f and said armsIS controli treaty — even thothough vited guests wavinj ng small American Her' in in a speech in London, in g “a new e ra oflifhistory." Forci^orce Base, b u t said he a n d Gor* ; his talks with MiiMikhail Gorbachev his tolltalks with Gorbachev produce(iced no flags and a Marii rine band' playing Therhere, the president said his sum- Al&ough theI Soviet£ leader had ex- bachlachev had made “tangible progress" would prove ‘'p >Qdi.and.promi3ing ai for "broakt ikthrough on-a new-pacti------------------- "Rufllog and Fiouriirishes!Land-th»-na*— mit-Ui-talks-with-Gorbachev-may naj^Uve—pres^isappoir rintment-over-the-lack— town the future." Realeagan and his wife-Nancy^ nwere_ _t[onal_anthem. begun;un d ism an tlin g Cold W ar bamer^rbai of miyor summilli t achievem ents, Rc- inatinating intermedjat^rarige nuclear “Peace' and freedoiidom are what this greetecited by Vice President GeoGeorge “As far as None; icy and I are con* b u. t heh vowed America will1 nremain agan said in hisis London speech Fri* weapveapons. As he noted, he and Gor- , : trip was about andd wew saw some.^real Bushh and.t .his wife Barbara ass tthey cemed, there’s no ] I place like home," .waryry a n d stro n g as it seekss -laBling-h doy th a t th e re hailad been “tangible pro- bachlachev exchanged ratification docu- !■ progress in sev ei^J areasoi in Moscow,” stoppetped off their plane onto a reded <car- Resgan said, a s th e i e audience cheered, changnges in Soviet policies. gress" toward trereaty agreernent for a menlnents in Moscow-for the pact they th e p re sid e n t. saidJd moments after pet The president pnironounced himself Ass<Lssessing his first visit totc th e drastic reductionn in st<^pHes of stra- i t J p b ]i l e s s Tr a t e ^ i : . , ■ .-TL’" r i s e : a ‘ q tL iif k ’ — y .-------- ___/: _ r " S = : - . T ; ............. ^ — TOe W ashington PoiT ■ ' ^ | j 1 ------^— W7SHINGT0N““ The nation’s ci- , ^M ore at work— -BBX— ] viliairujieraploymentenrratff laarmonth— ’ , 'A-'- ■ climbed to 6.6 percentfent following a d ip househieholds;_are_8om etim e3-volaiolatile- ' - in-.April, the Labor,orJJepartmenttre-.- from monthmi to month. For instancencfl, in - . | t § . port^Triday. April,I, thet household survey showeiiwed a " l i f Analysts said thoJio-increase likely 610,OOC}Q0 increase in the numbert>er 'of i". __ ..was.more.the.result:ult.of.a statistical -pcople-le-with jobs. Last-monthr-i)r-th e ^ quirk than a sign1 theth economy has numberber of jobholders fell by 520,C!o,ooo slowed abruptly.'WhilWIb the unemploy- — leaviaving 6.8 million per;son3.1ookJ .- r . ^ f / m en t» rate ro w fromom 6.4 percent in for worlork and unable to find it. April, industiy payrol)TolU-continued to Janetnet L. Norwood, the' depcepart- ■ - in crease ia May, th e departmentdl said, ment'si? commissioner of lobor stat3tatis-- r j | | I ____------------------------- :. - .. • . — rr3utT^h-aS:a=w-whole,-ih»-repor£IItic8,-toll f told a congressional'hesinn^t^g - t h a t - ^ ^ -------- contained h in ts the-ectreconbmy probably~u twiar“recurrent—clrcumstancefl ~7 “ s s h e - n ; will not continue to} expandn at the int wouldd put; more faith in the payrayroll ■ flation>adjuBted 4.44 percenti rate of - figures,es, which show a continuedid in»: the pnBt~two~ijoartiartenj. SomewhBt ireas^i ~Chan _ . ,1:1 could^allay al n jin g infla- th e houjouM.hold survey.._____________ —-^itoi^fearfin-fl^cialilal'marketa.* Those ’*Trioi•iur to t>ea5anBt~adpibtjnmit, t • ' fears have contributedted’to a sh arp rise M ay ppmployrnent n rise was 300,0( ij:i I in in te re st ra te s thiss spring.sp very lowlow by historical standards} aiand F riday’s report helpedhel the -stock considerderably lower than last yea; a nd bond m arkets ext<extend rallies th a t 1.3 millilillion,” Norwood said at a JoJoi in t began a week ago. InterestIni rates on Economi>mic Com m ittee session. “Ini-past ’pa _______ i- icHt!!EncEirEmrc2^are^-when-May-omploymen^grow ^OMh— • dropped about 0.3 percentageper point;' has beereen relatively weak, substanti the Dow-Jones averogrogo of industrial expansicisiqiis in employmcnt.gcneral slocks rose 18.85 pointsints to 2,071.3. occurredred in June or July." ----------- The-ttncmpioymontnt figures, which ' Virtualually all o fth e 210,000 Increaj r • • are -based on a survejrvey of American i• See JOBS on Page A2 "fur supeBrcoIliHei : < » f - — inilouse^<>_■___ The Associated PressI ................... lider spcipen'ding in fiscal 1989, whithich begins 0Oct. 1, to $100 m illionTN on * WASHINGTON------— 'The 'House' would be availablth^-bcgin-cohstnn I - .., J! voted overwhelming approvalap Friday tionofthithe project. .. to a D epartm ent of EntEnergy spending The IReggnn ndminifltrntion rf ..............^ ' blueprint.^at includesesS 5 l.6 billion for questedd S$363 million for th e p roject ii r tin >wI 'aS'^‘ ra d ;'« v tw :t^ ' th e superconducting sujsuper collidfer, a fiscal 198,98, including oney for construe■rue- ■ , • , ^ ncQTr j o i t l ^ o n . ' ' j ' ttiamive^igh-e'nergy^pK;•physics-proje^-i— tion. Inn itai votes on both billsT-th i ------——Tho su p e r collider,-wh•which advocates House-hi-has-said a decision-to' baih say could lead to breaktlikthroughs in un- should awav ait th e next adm in istratio n ie n f e pi►asrsetupp biased “ • doratanding basic mattlatter, would be The billbil sent to the Senate on FFri ri- - 1 againstt w om t^ a uthorized $147 millionion in fiscd 1989 day by a 290-27 : vdte would authorizirize TheAssociated Preds than male state workcTkers.— know-how, problem-sjm-solving and accountability re* p a nd $675 m illion and $774$7' million the continuedled spending on a wide variet} iety A nita H enna filedud tthe complaint afler she wasw • quired to performn ^em.U It then sets pay levels.. .. .-i. ;___.■ following two yews. _____ ___L ofresearcarch and development by theth e ____ B O IS E -- The sta to0 io f Idaho h as lashed o ut a t i at a ' ' denied a pay raise last summer under a legislatiitive- based on surveys bfof salariesJ in the private sector. ...,i ^ There is no guaranr^ntce thUt the Departmcment of Energy, includingling goyemmentiaecretary.. y.-whQ.complained-to_thcJedfedi_allocflIion_thQt saw/ aboutal: a third of the classifiified and other governmennent entititis for similar jobs. ' i | m oney -would flow to the project, clean-coaloal technology and alternativetive er^govemment that Ii , Idaho’s salary'structure wawas sta te workers go withoithout raises. Claiming the systeystem is widely regarded as "an i ‘ which would eventuallyUly cost a t least“ inotoFfudlid s. ■ . - • biased against w om en t tl employees— In many cases, the jobs thiit failed to get payp exemplary meanss of accomplishing the goal of i li S5.4 billion. A ctual speispending is ran- T he leg:legislation sets a spending tar- - In a response to the ,e Equal Employment Opporpor- raises la st year were iin th e lower end o fth e saleilnry comparable worth1 or .pay equity," the stato's.r^- trolled by ae_parate appropropriations leg- get of $3.S3.277 billion for fiscal ,1989.>89, tunity -Commission,' ] Deputy Attorney Genera?ral scale, positiisns Ms.s.re IHe^nna clajm ed w ere Jargi .sponsc pointed oiitt thatthi since tho Hay Plan waa ih- ; islation.