Bangor University DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY Does Co-Management Programme Reconcile Community Interests and Forest Conservation:A Case
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bangor University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Does Co-Management programme reconcile community interests and forest conservation:A Case study of Malawi Chinangwa, Linda Award date: 2014 Awarding institution: Bangor University Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 05. Oct. 2021 DOES CO-MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME RECONCILE COMMUNITY INTERESTS AND FOREST CONSERVATION: A CASE STUDY OF MALAWI. A Thesis Submitted in Candidature for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) By Linda Lindizgani Robert Chinangwa School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom. August, 2014. THESIS ABSTRACT There is an increasing consensus that access to forests and forest resources can contribute positively to the reduction of poverty among rural households in developing countries. Furthermore, forests contribute global environmental services such as mitigation of climate change through carbon sequestration. Therefore, sustainable management of forest resources is paramount to ensuring that these resources and services are available for current and future generations of nearby rural populations as well as more distant stakeholders. For most governments and their partners one of the key challenges to achieving sustainable forest resources is identifying a forest management approach that reconciles community interests and forest conservation goals. Currently forest co-management approaches receive support from governments and the donor community because they are hypothesised to have the potential to simultaneously advance community livelihood goals and forest conservation. However, there is limited evidence to support this hypothesis. Therefore this study uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to provide empirical evidence on the extent to which co-management programmes achieve sustainable forest management and reconcile multiple stakeholders’ interest in forests and forest conservation goals. The study uses the case study of the Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods Programme (IFMSLP) in Malawi, which is funded by the European Union. The study was conducted in with Zomba district (Zomba-Malosa forest reserve) and Ntchisi district (Ntchisi forest reserve). Household interviews and forest inventory were used to: explore what local actors perceive as criteria for measuring the success of a co-management programme; assess whether co- management can achieved true devolution of powers and responsibilities to local institutions; assess the impact of co-management on forest condition, and; estimate the current livelihood and welfare impacts of the programme. The study shows that, other aspects of co-management and sustainable forest management such as: community participation in decision making; access to and availability of forest resources; and infrastructure development (which are usually not included in forest management impact assessment studies), are also important criteria for assessing a co-management programme from local actor’s perspective. The study also reveals that it is difficult for co- management programmes to realize true devolution because governments retain ownership of the forest and there is limited political will among state authorities to devolve rights and responsibilities to local institutions. The findings of this study suggest that the impact of a co-management programme on forest conditions may vary depending on pre-existing forest conditions as well as on how participating communities understand and interpret the programme. Therefore, due to lack of information on forest condition before the programme, it is difficult to determine the effect of co-management on forest conditions from one-time study data, even with method triangulation. 63% of respondents perceive that co-management has had no impact on their livelihoods. However, 80% are willing to pay) annual membership fees (mean = 812 Malawi kwacha ≈ $2) to participate in the programme, because of perceived possible future benefits. This shows that local people are investing their time and labour in co-management based on optimistic expectations, which puts them at a risk of being taken advantage of by programme initiators as there is no guarantee of a future benefit. Therefore, the opportunity cost of communities’ participation in co-management activities which provide global environmental benefits, is an important reason for governments to consider inclusion of Payment of Ecosystems Services (PES) in the programmes. Finally, the finding of this study suggest that forest co- management has the potential to reconcile community interests and forest conservation, however local actors’ attitudes; unaccountable institutions; tenure systems and; limited knowledge and skill development among local actors may limit its effectiveness. i DEDICATION To Atle-Rodney and Zoe Lindizgani-Rexa (I wouldn’t have done it differently!) v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank my supervisors Prof. Andrew Pullin and Dr. Neal Hockley, for all the technical assistance, advice and guidance you rendered me throughout my study. I would also like to express my appreciation to Dr Fergus Sinclair and the Word Agroforestry Centre team (Nairobi), for your assistance and financial support during the field work. Special thanks go to the Malawi Government for funding my studies. I am grateful for the support given to me by Mr J. Mussa (DLRC) and Mr F. Linje (PHRMO). I would also like to give special thanks to communities in Zomba and Ntchisi, who shared their time and lives with me, and made this study possible. Am also grateful to the staff of Department of forestry (Malawi) especially, Mr T. Kamoto, Mrs S. Gama, Mr. A. Munyenyembe, Mr Magagula, Mr Nangwale, Mr Makupete, Mr Goneta, and all ground staff, for their assistance during the field work. Let me also express my gratitude to the field study team, Walter, Marumbo, Gomezga, Elvine and Daniel, you were hard working and friendly, you made the hot and dusty trips to the forest and villages memorable. I can never imagine my current position without the love, prayers and support of my Mum and Dad. You are great parents, thank you very much. Very special thanks go to my brothers Robert (I appreciate your time and help with the children in Bangor), Walter, Tonda, Kondani, my amazing Sister Ruth and nephew Tikondayani, for supporting me and my family during my study and always. My absolute thanks go to Rodney Lunduka, my husband and friend, for the sacrifices you have made for me, over the years. You have been my strength and my journey would have been unbearable without you, your love and support. Thank you for braving it all, Yewo Chomene. And a lifetime thanks go to my wonderful children, Atle and Zoe, you have had to go through difficult times over the years of my study, and yet you still smile and give me a smile. To all the staff of Bangor University and especially the School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, thank you for your assistance. And to all I have come to know during my stay in Bangor and who have contributed to my studies in one way or the other, Thank you for the academic and social support. And to Sally, Rose, Sarobidy, Patrick and Matilda, I am grateful for the times we have come to know each other, thanks for the friendship and support. Above all to GOD, Your grace has been sufficient and sustained me. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS THESIS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. i DECLARATION AND CONSENT .......................................................................................................... ii DEDICATION ......................................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. xiii LIST OF APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................... xiv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACROYNMNS ................................................................................. xv CHAPTER 1: THESIS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................