DOCSLIB.ORG

PA00TRTK.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PA00TRTK.Pdf i Cover photo: For nearly 80 years, Nepal and India have applied engineering practices to solve cross border issues related to water management issues such as flooding. Some of the most successful have been those implemented by local communities on both sides of the border such as the riverbank stabilization shown here. Nonetheless, communities on the Nepal side feel that India is capturing a larger share of the benefits of the Lower Mahakali Watershed. Photo credit: USAID/PANI LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED PROFILE: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Program Title: USAID/Nepal’s Program for Aquatic Natural Resources Improvement Project (PANI) DAI Project Number: 1002810 Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Nepal IDIQ Number: AID-OAA-I-14-00014 Task Order Number: AID-367-TO-16-00001 Contractor: DAI Global LLC Date of Publication: August 7, 2017 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. I CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... III LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... IV LIST OF A .................................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 1 LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED: NATURE, WEALTH, AND POWER ....... 9 NATURE ..................................................................................................................... 10 WEATHER AND CLIMATE CHANGE ........................................................................................ 10 Temperature ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Rainfall ................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Climate Change ................................................................................................................................................ 12 HYDROLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 14 Streams and Tributaries .................................................................................................................................. 15 Lakes .................................................................................................................................................................... 16 STREAM WATER QUALITY ...................................................................................................... 17 LAND COVER AND USE ........................................................................................................... 19 BIODIVERSITY .......................................................................................................................... 20 WEALTH .................................................................................................................... 24 SOCIAL CONSTITUTION .......................................................................................................... 25 FISHING COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................................... 25 TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................................................. 26 LIVELIHOODS OF PEOPLE IN THE WATERSHED AREA: ............................................................ 26 Agriculture ......................................................................................................................................................... 27 Capture fisheries .............................................................................................................................................. 29 RIVERBED MINING ................................................................................................................... 30 Flooding and Inundation ................................................................................................................................. 32 HOUSEHOLD WATER RESOURCE AVAILABILITY AND USE: ..................................................... 36 POWER/GOVERNANCE ......................................................................................... 38 RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 38 Transboundary Water Management ............................................................................................................ 38 Shuklaphanta NP and Pancheswor Dam ..................................................................................................... 39 NEPAL POLICY PROVISIONS AND AUTHORITY TO GOVERN .................................................... 40 IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANS .......... 47 NATURE, WEALTH AND POWER INTERLINKAGES ...................................... 48 KEY THREATS TO MANAGEMENT OF WATER RESOURCES FOR MULTIPLE USERS ......................................................................................................................... 51 FLOODING .............................................................................................................................. 55 i RIVERBED MINING .................................................................................................................... 56 DECREASING FISH STOCKS AND UNSUSTAINABLE FISHERIES PRACTICES ............................ 57 TRANSBOUNDARY WATER MANAGEMENT ............................................................................ 58 RESOURCE USE REGIMES: FISHERIES, SAND MINING ............................................................. 59 CLIMATE CHANGE .................................................................................................................. 59 VISION STATEMENT FOR LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED ..................... 62 VISION ..................................................................................................................................... 62 MISSION .................................................................................................................................. 62 PRIORIZIED ISSUES IN MAHALAKI WATERSHED ....................................................................... 62 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 65 ANNEX 1: METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING WATERSHED PROFILE .. 66 ANNEX 2: LOCATON MAP OF LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED ............. 69 ANNEX 3: MAP OF WHOLE MAHAKALI RIVER BASIN ................................... 71 ANNEX4: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED ..... 73 ANNEX 5: RIVER NETWORK IN LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED ........... 75 ANNEX 6: ROAD NETWORK IN LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED .......... 77 ANNEX 7: BIOPHYSICAL MAP OF LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED....... 79 ANNEX 8: SECONDARY SOURCES OF LIVELIHOODS IN WATERSHED ... 81 ANNEX 9: VISION AND MISSION OF LOWER MAHAKALI WATERSHED . 83 II LIST OF TABLES [TO BE FINALIZED] Table 1: Stream Discharge of Some Waterbodies in Lower Mahakali Watershed ..................................... 16 Table 2: Water Bodies in Lower Mahakali Watershed ................................................................................ 16 Table 3: Water Quality Standard of Different Streams in the Watershed ................................................... 18 Table 4: Status of Fisheries in Lower Mahakali Watershed ........................................................................ 22 Table 5: List of Irrigation Projects in Lower Mahakali Watershed ............................................................... 28 Table 6: Access to Climatic Information in the Watershed ......................................................................... 36 Table 7: Policy Provision and Status of Enforcement ................................................................................. 41 Table 8: Representation of Women and Marginalized Community in Decision-making Body ................... 43 Table 9: Water User Groups in the Watershed ........................................................................................... 44 Table 10: Micro catchment identified by DSCO Kanchanpur within the area of the Watershed ................ 47 Table 11: Priority Issues, Linkages and Recommendations ....................................................................... 52 Table 12: Summary of Prioritized Issues by Municipality ........................................................................... 62 III LIST OF FIGURES [TO BE FINALIZED] Figure 1: Satellite Image of the Lower Mahakali Watershed ........................................................................ 2 Figure 2: Map of the Lower Mahakali Watershed ......................................................................................... 4 Figure 3: Location of Priority Issues Collected from Multi-stakeholder Consultation Workshops ................ 7 Figure 6: Maximum, Minimum and Average Long-term Monthly Temperature (⁰C) in the Watershed ...... 11 Figure 7: Annual Mean Temperature in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food Security Bulletin - 21
    Food Security Bulletin - 21 United Nations World Food Programme FS Bulletin, November 2008 Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System Issue 21 Highlights Over the period July to September 2008, the number of people highly and severely food insecure increased by about 50% compared to the previous quarter due to severe flooding in the East and Western Terai districts, roads obstruction because of incessant rainfall and landslides, rise in food prices and decreased production of maize and other local crops. The food security situation in the flood affected districts of Eastern and Western Terai remains precarious, requiring close monitoring, while in the majority of other districts the food security situation is likely to improve in November-December due to harvesting of the paddy crop. Decreased maize and paddy production in some districts may indicate a deteriorating food insecurity situation from January onwards. this period. However, there is an could be achieved through the provision Overview expectation of deteriorating food security of return packages consisting of food Mid and Far-Western Nepal from January onwards as in most of the and other essentials as well as A considerable improvement in food Hill and Mountain districts excessive agriculture support to restore people’s security was observed in some Hill rainfall, floods, landslides, strong wind, livelihoods. districts such as Jajarkot, Bajura, and pest diseases have badly affected In the Western Terai, a recent rapid Dailekh, Rukum, Baitadi, and Darchula. maize production and consequently assessment conducted by WFP in These districts were severely or highly reduced food stocks much below what is November, revealed that the food food insecure during April - July 2008 normally expected during this time of the security situation is still critical in because of heavy loss in winter crops, year.
    [Show full text]
  • Kanchanpur District
    District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) For Kanchanpur District ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Government of Nepal District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) of Kanchanpur District Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads (DOLIDAR) District Development Committee, Kanchanpur Volume I Final Report January. 2016 Prepared by: Project Research and Engineering Associates for the District Development Committee (DDC) and District Technical Office (DTO), with Technical Assistance from the Department of Local Infrastructure and Agricultural Roads (DOLIDAR), Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development and grant supported by DFID through Rural Access Programme (RAP3). District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) For Kanchanpur District ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Research and Engineering Associates 1 District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) For Kanchanpur District ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Research and Engineering Associates Lagankhel, Lalitpur Phone: 5539607 Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal • FWR/MWR Floods and Landslides Situation Report # 1 8 October 2009
    Nepal • FWR/MWR Floods and Landslides Situation Report # 1 8 October 2009 This report was issued by UN OCHA Nepal. It covers the period from October 4 - 8 2009. HIGHLIGHTS • Ten districts in the Mid and Far Western Regions have been affected by the floods and landslides caused by four days of continuous rain; • More than 40 deaths have been recorded, but the impact of landslides has been most felt in Accham (20 deaths) and Dadeldhura (12 deaths) districts, and that of the floods in Kailali and Kanchanpur districts (source: NRCS); • More than 3,000 families and 18,000 individuals have been affected, and at least 1,000 families have been displaced (source: NRCS); • Regional and district level resources can meet current emergency needs and the District Disaster Relief Committees are coordinating efforts in all affected districts; • Damage to roads and telecommunication systems have obstructed search and rescue efforts, especially in hilly and mountainous districts and remote VDCs in Terai districts. • Over the past 24 hours rains have decreased and water levels in many rivers receded. I. Situation Overview At least ten districts in the far- and mid-western regions have been affected by the heavy rains which started in the far-western districts and moved eastward. More than 40 deaths have been reported up to now, including 12 in Dadeldhura district, and 20 in Accham district (source: NRCS). The amount of rainfall was especially high in Doti and Dadeldhura districts, where it reached 245.7 mm and 227.4 mm respectively in a 24-hour period (Meteorological Forecasting Division website).
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-Led Displacement: a Double Whammy on the Poor
    [Downloaded free from http://www.conservationandsociety.org on Tuesday, July 29, 2014, IP: 129.79.203.179] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal Conservation and Society 12(1): 65-76, 2014 Article Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the Poor Lai Ming Lama,# and Saumik Paulb aOsaka University, School of Human Sciences, Suita City, Osaka, Japan bUniversity of Nottingham (Malaysia Campus), School of Economics, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia #Corresponding author. E‑mail: [email protected] Abstract The practice of conservation through displacement has become commonplace in developing countries. However, resettlement programs remain at very low standards as government policies only focus on economic-based compensation which often excludes socially and economically marginalised groups. In this paper, based on a case study of the displaced indigenous people, the Rana Tharus, from the Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve in Nepal, we argue that compensation as a panacea is a myth as it does not effectively replace the loss of livelihoods. This is particularly the case when the indigenous community’s customary rights to land are not legally protected. Our ethnographic data support the contention that the history of social exclusion is rooted in the land reform and settlement policies, which deprived the Rana Tharus of proper land rights. The present land compensation scheme resulted in a ‘double whammy’ on indigenous forest dwellers. The legal land title holders on average received less than 60% of their land. Moreover, due to the poor quality of soil in the resettlement areas the average crop yield was less than half the quantity produced before displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Dairy Business Value Chains in Far-Westen Terai Districts of Nepal
    J. Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci. 33-34: 269-281 (2015) 269 ANALYSING DAIRY BUSINESS VALUE CHAINS IN FAR-WESTEN TERAI DISTRICTS OF NEPAL T. Bhandari Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Nepal ABSTRACT Dairy sub-sector is recognized as fast growing profitable agro-business in far-western Terai districts but past studies to support that statement is lacking. The field survey was conducted from February to April 2012 with the aim to analyse business capabilities of operational service providers, investigating value chain analysis and market analysis of the overall milk business. The study collected primary information from 103 respondents by applying multi-stakeholder discussions along with constraint-opportunity analysis. The identified value chain functions were: input supply, milk production, collection, chilling, processing, trading and consumption. The major business stakeholders included 28 private dairies, 34 milk producing cooperatives,7 chilling centres, Dhangadhi Milk Supply Scheme, 25 milk vendors, 44 sweet houses, and more than 100 hotels and restaurants which were transacting 20800 tons equals milk and milk products. Value margin analysis revealed that milk producers were earning higher profit in comparison to the additional cost required for product transformation. Nevertheless, accounting dominance of services offered ultimately on market functions, private dairies were capturing higher profit margins through retailing short shelf-life products disposing through local market outlets. Gross margin analysis on few dairy products sold by the private dairies revealed that selling curd, paneer, Khoa, and ice cream were respectively two times, five times and twenty times profitable, than the selling standard milk. The market analysis indicated 26 percent higher supply of milk in flush season months to the end market outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 National Trust for Nature Conservation MISSION STATEMENT “To conserve, manage and promote nature in all its diversity balancing human needs with the environment on a sustainable basis for posterity-ensuring maximum community participation with due cognizance of the linkages between economics, environment and ethics through a process in which people are both the principal actors and beneficiaries.” With over 3 decades of experience in the field of participatory conservation, right from the grassroots level to policy and core research, the National Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC) continues to steer a phenomenal track record of driving the principal of Conservation for Development. NTNC, established in 1982 by a legislative act, is an autonomous and not-for-profit organization, mandated to work in the field of nature conservation in Nepal. From its very inception the Trust fully understands that local communities matter, and that they are eventually stipulated to become the flag bearers of all conservation initiatives. To ensure that the locus of sustainable conservation is bearing on each of these communities, the Trust has successfully implemented various projects from nature and biodiversity conservation, cultural heritage protection, ecotourism development, alternative energy promotion, gender empowerment, livelihood enhancement. Given its deep integration with the community, and coupled with its expertise, the Trust maintains an unmatched advantage—whether it be in matters related to wildlife research and monitoring, community engagement, anti-poaching, conservation education, needs identification, assessment and impact study, capacity building, or in matters related to good governance and local institutional empowerment. This is one of the main reasons why NTNC continues to embrace a reputation that is crucial in cohabiting the development agendas for a large number of multilateral stakeholder projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assistance Consultant's Report Nepal: Far Western Region
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: TA 8817 January 2017 Nepal: Far Western Region Urban Development Project (Volume 2) Prepared by: Michael Green London, United Kingdom For: Ministry of Urban Development Department of Urban Development and Building Construction This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. Government of Nepal Ministry of Urban Development Second Integrated Urban Development Project (IUDP2) (PPTA 8817–NEP) Draft Final Report Discussion Note # 1 Economic and Urban Development Vision for Far Western Terai Region August 2015 Discussion Note # 1 Economic and Urban Development Vision for Far Western Terai Region Part A : Economic Development Vision and Strategy TA 8817-NEP: Second Integrated Urban Development Project Discussion Note # 1 Economic and Urban Development Vision for Far Western Terai Region Part A : Economic Development Vision and Strategy Contents 1 Context 1 1.1 Purpose of the Vision 1 1.2 Nepal – A gifted country 1 1.3 The Terai – the bread basket of Nepal 2 1.4 Far West Nepal – Sundar Sudur Paschim 3 2 Prerequisites for Transformational Growth and Development 4 2.1 The Constitution and decentralization of governance 4 2.2 Strengthening Nepal’s economic links with India 4 2.3 Developing Transportation 5 2.3.1 Developing strong transport
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Darwin Initiative: Final Report Darwin Project Information Project reference 22-009 Project title Securing Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve’s Grassland and wellbeing of local communities Host country(ies) Nepal Contract holder institution Zoological Society of London Partner institution(s) Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), National Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC), Himalayan Nature (HN) Darwin grant value £ 284,417 Start/end dates of project 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2018 Project leader’s name Hem Sagar Baral Project website/blog/Twitter https://www.zsl.org/conservation/regions/asia/Shuklaphanta- wildlife-reserve-%E2%80%93-nepal https://himalayannature.org/index.php/2017/01/17/darwin- initiative-securing-shuklaphanta-wildlife-reserves-grasslands- and-wellbeing-of-local-communities/ Report author(s) and date ZSL: Hem Sagar Baral, Gitanjali Bhattacharya, Bhagawan Raj Dahal, Tek Raj Bhatt, Jake Williams, Pradeep Raj Joshi DNPWC: Bed Kumar Dhakal, Gopal Bahadur Ghimire, NTNC: Dr Naresh Subedi, Anil Prasai Himalayan Nature: Chandra Jung Hamal 30 June 2018 Project Rationale The project was designed in consultation with Shuklaphanta National Park (ShNP) and the Buffer Zone Management Committee (BZMC), a representative committee of communities living around the park, to address the problem of unregulated and illegal grazing inside the park. ShNP Management Plan identified overgrazing in core and peripheral areas as a major cause of the decline of grassland habitat and wildlife. Nearly 17,000 cattle each day, constituting 75% of those owned by buffer zone communities, used to graze freely within the core and peripheral area of the park. The frequent and unregulated sharing of grazing land not only resulted in overgrazing, but also had increased the risk of disease transmission between domestic ruminants and wild animals.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background
    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Forest is not only the largest natural resource in terms of spatial coverage but also an important means for their products such as fuelwood, fodder, timber and medicines to majority of the people. The conservation of forest resources may also help in diversification of wild life and biodiversity. The fuelwood from the forest products is a major source of energy for majority of the rural people. Fuelwood is primarily used for cooking and heating. The forests are the only sources that have received heavy pressure as a result of meeting ever increasing demand of fuelwood. Forests, which are main resource of biomass energy, have already been exploited beyond their sustainable capacity and are becoming relatively scarce (Katuwal and Bohara 2009). As more than 80 % of the energy needs in rural area are met by fuelwood, thus exerting immense pressure on the forest resources of the country with negative impacts on biodiversity conservation (WECS 2006). The biomass consumption has vast implications both for deterioration of natural resources which has been home to large number of wild flora and fauna. Alternatives to wood and biomass based energy is unrealistic to the large majority of households in the near future as well. In this scenario, efforts and initiatives geared towards a sustainable alternative energy program seems crucial as a mitigating measure for the harmful effects derived from the excessive use of natural resources for energy (Thapa and KC 2009). Promotion of alternative energy has been a major component of biodiversity conservation, as it reduces human pressure in the park and buffer zone forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Hariyo Ban Program Ii Threats and Vulnerabilities
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM II (2016-2021) THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES ASSESSMENT OF PARKS AND CORRIDORS OF TERAI ARC LANDSCAPE Prepared by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660 Kathmandu, Nepal 21 April 2017 © WWF 2017 All rights reserved Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit WWF. Published by WWF Nepal PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected] , www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Disclaimer This Threats and Vulnerabilities Assessment of Parks and Corridors in Terai Arc Landscape is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................5 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................6 Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone ...................................................................................................................7 Threat Ratings of Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone...................................................................................8 Barandabhar Corridor ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Red Cross Society National Headquarters Disaster Management Department
    Nepal Red Cross Society National Headquarters Disaster Management Department Total Affected Districts 8 Name of Districts Kailali, Kanchanpur, Bardiya, Gulmi, Dadeldhura, Salyan, Dang, Doti Type of disaster Flood and Landslides Date of Occurrence 19 September, 2008 Update no 4 Date of Update 26 September, 2008 1. General Overview Torrential rain fall starting from Sept 19 has triggered the flood and landslides in different districts of the country and has claimed a total of 40 lives, several others sustained injured and 4 went missing. According to NRCS Kailali district chapter, a total of 15 people killed alone in Kailali district and 28 went missing. At least 16,000 houses of 39 VDCs and 2 municipalities have been affected including 15,019 displaced families in Kailali District. Out of which, Tikapur Municipality, Lalbhoji, Pratappur, Naryanpur, Dhansingpur, Ramshikarjhala are most affected VDC. The displaced people are taking shelters in school, public buildings and relatives. The police, army, local people and NRCS volunteers have been mobilized for the rescue operation. Likewise, the flood and landslides have badly hit the Kanchanpur and Bardeya districts. A total of 10 dead bodies have been recovered in Kanchanpur District. The flood triggered by the Mahakali River has affected a total of 5500 houses in 2, 11,12,12,15 wards of Mahendranagar municipality. A total of 17 VDCs have been affected in Kanchanpur district. Out of which, Mahendranagar Municipality, Rampur Bilaspur, Parasan, Rautali Bichuwa, Krishnapur, Dhodhara, Dekath Bhuly and Sankarpur VDCs have been badly affected. Similarly, in Bardeya district, a total of 32 VDCs have been affected by the flood.
    [Show full text]