DOCSLIB.ORG

Metallurgical Coal and Coke Testing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SGS MINERALS SERVICES – T3 SGS 526 10-2013 METALLURGICAL COAL AND COKE TESTING RHEOLOGY, in dial divisions per minute (DDPM) of the Characteristic Arnu Dilatometer curves are stirrer rotation. generated when the piston movements CARBONIZATION, (taken as a percentage of the total original REACTIVITY, • High volatiles: 5,000 to >30,000 DDPM. coal cylinder length) are plotted against PETROGRAPHY • Medium volatiles: <200 to 20,000 the corresponding temperatures. These charts provide valuable information SGS is a global leader in coal and coke DDPM. regarding the suitability of your samples laboratory analysis. Our experienced • Low volatiles: 20 to 1,000 DDPM. for use as coking coals. staff can provide complete and impartial The Gieseler Plastometer test is useful rheological property tests on your coking in determining the plastic range of coals to ensure their quality and suitability coals, which is the difference between for your operation. Partner with SGS the initial softening and resolidification and leverage our technical capabilities temperatures. Plastic range in OC and to guarantee your coal analysis meets maximum fluidity in DDPM are key factors the global standards for quality and in determining which blends of coals will excellence. be optimal for coking. RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ARNU DILATOMETER TEST Coking coals possess the ability, when The Arnu Dilatometer test is used to Sapozhnikov Test heated in the absence of air, to soften, determine the swelling properties of coal swell and then re-solidify to form a when heated under standard conditions. coherent, porous, hard coke structure. A 60 mm coal pencil, formed under SAPOZHNIKOV TEST The Gieseler Plastometer and Arnu pressure from minus 60 mesh coal, is Dilatometer tests are used to evaluate inserted into a precisely calibrated retort This test was developed in Russia in the rheological or plastic properties of tube with a graduated piston on top. The 1931 and is performed in accordance with a coal or coal blend. In addition, the sample is then placed in a furnace. The GOST 1186. The Chinese have adopted Sapozhnikov and G Caking Index tests apparatus is heated at 3°C/minute and the test (GB/T 479) with some minor are used in certain areas of the world as the movement of the piston, as the coal differences. A 100g sample of minus rheological evaluation tools. pencil shrinks and expands, is recorded. 1.5/1.6mm coal is placed into a steel capsule and pressed with the help of a The maximum dilatation value is the piston and a prescribed weight forming GIESELER PLASTOMETER TEST key parameter and for individual coals, a briquette. Heating is performed in a the highest value possible is considered For this analysis, 5 grams of minus 40 furnace with a temperature rise of 3°C/ optimal: mesh prepared coal are packed into a minute. Between 350 and 650°C, the retort barrel assembly along with a stirrer. • High volatiles: +50 to >300%. upper and lower levels of the plastic layer A constant torque is applied to the stirrer • Medium volatiles: +100 to 250%. are measured at regular intervals using and the coal is heated at 3°C/minute. As • Low volatiles: <0 to 200%. a needle amd millimeter scale. The Y the coal softens, the stirrer begins to turn. value is the maximum difference between The maximum fluidity value is expressed the upper and lower plastic layer levels expressed in mm. Y values will typically range from 5-35mm. The X value equals the percent contraction, or shrinkage, of the coal brickette during the test. X values generally range from 0-35%. Arnu Dilatometer Curve Gieseler Plastometer Curve SGS MINERALS SERVICES – T3 SGS 526 2 SGS currently performs this test in Russia SGS operates sole heated ovens in the US MOVEABLE WALL OVEN TEST and China, with new testing facilities to meet your coal testing requirements. SGS uses a moveable wall oven to coming on line in Australia and the US. accommodate your coal carbonization testing. Our 18’ oven holds a charge G CAKING INDEX TEST of 650-750 lbs of coal to test new or This test was developed in China and is modified coal blends. This oven produces performed in accordance with GB/T 5447 coke of suitable size and quantity for and ISO 15585 standards. It is used as coke physical tests such as stability, a primary met coal evaluation tool by hardness, and CRI/CSR. Wall and internal Chinese coke producers. In this test, 1g gas pressures generated during the test of minus 0.2mm coal is mixed with 5g are also measured. The movable wall anthracite and placed in a crucible. A prevents oven damage due to excess 100-115g steel weight is placed on top of expansion and/or pressure. the coal sample and then the sample is pressed for 30 seconds under a 6lk mass. The sample is rapidly coked in an electric furnace to 850°C in 15 minutes. The coked is weighed (M), placed in a small drum and rotated for 5 minutes at 50+/- 2 Sole Heated Oven rpm. The coke residue is screened at 1mm and the weight of the +1mm coke 30 LB PRESSURE TEST OVEN (PTO) (M1) is determined. The +1mm coke is then tumbled a second time, with the SGS operates a 30lb pressure test oven residue screened at 1mm and the weight with 2 computer-controlled heating of the +1mm coke (M2) is determined. programs. There is a 3-hour program Moveable Wall Oven G Caking Index = 10+((30M1+70M2/M) to determine maximum wall pressure Values typically range from 20 to >100, generated and a 7-hour program used with >85 desired. to generate coke for reactivity and after COKE PHYSICAL TESTING reaction strength testing. High coking SGS currently has the capability to pressure can damage the walls in by- Several tests are used to measure the perform this test in China, with facilities product coke ovens. SGS will use the PTO physical properties of blast furnace coke being set up in Australia and the US. as an effective screening and comparison however the ASTM, ISO Micum/IRSID tool for evaluating medium and low and JIS tumbler tests, and the coke CARBONIZATION TESTING volatile coking coals for your facility. reactivity/coke strength after reaction Pilot scale carbonization tests are used to test, are the most commonly performed. evaluate coking coals and blends prior to testing in commercial coke ovens. These COKE REACTIVITY INDEX (CRI) AND COKE tests are used to evaluate how coals and STRENGTH AFTER REACTION (CSR) coal blends will perform in by-product When coke descends in the blast coke ovens in terms of ease of pushing furnace, it is subjected to reaction with of the coke mass from the oven, coking countercurrent CO and abrasion. These pressure, and resultant coke quality. 2 concurrent processes weaken the coke and chemically react with it to produce SOLE HEATED OVEN (SHO) excess fines that can decrease the Tests done in the sole heated oven permeability of the blast furnace burden. evaluate the contraction or expansion The CRI/CSR test measures coke tendencies of coals or coal blends when reactively in carbon dioxide at elevated heated under controlled conditions. High temperatures and its strength after volatile coals generally contract and low reaction by tumbling. In the test, 200g volatile coals generally expand. The final of 3/4” x 7/8” (19 x 22 mm) sized coke coke mass must contract 8-12% for ease is reacted in a vessel with CO gas for 2 Pressure Test Oven 2 of pushing from the by-product oven. hours at 1100°C. The weight loss after the SGS MINERALS SERVICES – T3 SGS 526 3 reaction equals the CRI. The reacted coke and hardness determinations are used to determine the percentage of each is then tumbled in an I-shaped tumbler primarily in the US. ISO Micum and IRSID coal in a blend or to compare changes for 600 revolutions at 20 rpm and is then tumbler results are used mainly in Europe, in quality of individual coals or blends weighed. The weight percent of the + while the JIS tumbler data is mainly used over time. This system consists of a 3/8” coke equals the CSR. Most blast in Japan, South Korea and Brazil. Zeiss microscope and digital camera, a furnaces will require a coke with a CSR computer controlled motorized stage, greater than 60 and CRI less than 25. and software to compile and analyze PETROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS the data. The DIS gathers over 5 million ASTM STABILITY AND HARDNESS, reflectance values for a single coal and ISO MICUM/IRSID AND JIS JAPANESE COAL PETROGRAPHY over 9 million for multi-seam coals or coal blends to generate a unique reflectogram TUMBLER TESTS Coal petrography is a microscopic for each sample. Cursors can be set technique used to determine a coal’s rank to isolate the various ranks of coal in a (degree of coalification) and type (amount blend and determine their corresponding and category of macerals) on polished percentages specimens of minus 20 mesh prepared coal. Petrography is primarily used as a tool to evaluate bituminous coals and coal COKE AND BY-PRODUCT PETROGRAPHY blends in terms of their ability to produce blast furnace coke. Rank is determined by measuring the percent light reflectance of the maceral vitrinite. Type is determined using a point count procedure to obtain the volume percent of the various coal macerals, or fossilized plant remains. Coal petrography can also be used to determine whether contaminants are present in the coal and to detect oxidized coal in the sample. CRI / CSR Furnace and Controller DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEM (DIS) These coke tumbler tests measure the SGS uses a digital imaging system (DIS) resistance of coke to impact and abrasion Digital Imaging System during removal from the coke oven and transportation, and the abrasion that occurs during its descent in the blast SGS provides coke petrography services furnace.
Recommended publications
  • Petrographic and Vitrinite Reflectance Analyses of a Suite of High Volatile Bituminous Coal Samples from the United States and Venezuela

    Petrographic and Vitrinite Reflectance Analyses of a Suite of High Volatile Bituminous Coal Samples from the United States and Venezuela

    Petrographic and vitrinite reflectance analyses of a suite of high volatile bituminous coal samples from the United States and Venezuela Open-File Report 2008-1230 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk A. Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Hackley, P.C., Kolak, J.J., 2008, Petrographic and vitrinite reflectance analyses of a suite of high volatile bituminous coal samples from the United States and Venezuela: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1230, 36 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1230. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................1 Methods ..............................................................................................................................................................................1
  • NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES in the COAL INDUSTRY IAEA, VIENNA, 1995 IAEA-TECDOC-845 ISSN 1011-4289 IAEA© , 1995 Printed by the IAEA in Austria November 1995 FOREWORD

    NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES in the COAL INDUSTRY IAEA, VIENNA, 1995 IAEA-TECDOC-845 ISSN 1011-4289 IAEA© , 1995 Printed by the IAEA in Austria November 1995 FOREWORD

    IAEA-TECDOC-845 Nuclear techniques coalinthe industry Proceedings finala of Research Co-ordination Meeting held in Krakow, Poland, 9-12 May 1994 W INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY ULr^ïïfî IAEe Th A doe t normallsno y maintain stock f reportso thin si s series. However, microfiche copie f thesso e reportobtainee b n sca d from IN IS Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse 5 0 10 x P.OBo . A-1400 Vienna, Austria Orders should be accompanied by prepayment of Austrian Schillings 100,- in the form of a cheque or in the form of IAEA microfiche service coupons orderee whicb y hdma separately fro INIe mth S Clearinghouse. The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Industrial Application Chemistrd san y Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse 5 0 10 P.Ox Bo . A-1400 Vienna, Austria NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES IN THE COAL INDUSTRY IAEA, VIENNA, 1995 IAEA-TECDOC-845 ISSN 1011-4289 IAEA© , 1995 Printed by the IAEA in Austria November 1995 FOREWORD e yearlasw fe Th t s have witnessed many important advance e developmenth n i s d an t application nucleaf so r technique coae th l n sindustryi . Nuclear borehole logging techniques basen do measurement of natural radioactivity, X and gamma ray absorption and scattering and neutron interactions are extensively employed for exploration programmes and in situ evaluation of coal. On-line analysis based on a variety of techniques is widely used to optimize coal processing operations increasee th ; d product yiel assuref do d qualit reductiod yan energn ni y usage have resulted in enormous economic benefits to the coal industry.
  • Chemical and Physical Structural Studies on Two Inertinite-Rich Lump

    Chemical and Physical Structural Studies on Two Inertinite-Rich Lump

    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INERTINITE-RICH LUMP COALS. Nandi Malumbazo A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philoso- phy in the School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering at the University of the Witwatersrand. Johannesburg, 2011 DECLARATION I, Nandi Malumbazo, declare that the thesis entitled: “CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INER- TINITE-RICH LUMP COALS” is my own work and that all sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and ac- knowledged by means of references. Signature: ……………………………………………………………….. Date:………………………………………………………………………… Page i ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Two Highveld inertinite-rich lump coals were utilized as feed coal samples in order to study their physical, chemical structural and petrographic variations during heat treat- ment in a packed-bed reactor unit combustor. The two feed lump coals were selected as it is claimed that Coal B converts at a slower rate in a commercial coal conversion process when compared to Coal A. The reason for this requires detailed investigation. Chemical structural variations were determined by proximate and coal char CO2 reactiv- ity analysis. Physical structural variations were determined by FTIR, BET adsorption methods, XRD and 13C Solid state NMR analysis. Carbon particle type analysis was con- ducted to determine the petrographic constituents of the reactor generated samples, their maceral associations (microlithotype), and char morphology. This analysis was undertaken with the intention of tracking the carbon conversion and char formation and consumption behaviour of the two coal samples within the reactor. Proximate analysis revealed that Coal A released 10 % more of its volatile matter through the reactor compared to Coal B.
  • Update to the Developments of Hisarna an Ulcos Alternative Ironmaking Process Ir

    Update to the Developments of Hisarna an Ulcos Alternative Ironmaking Process Ir

    Update to the Developments of Hisarna An Ulcos alternative ironmaking process Ir. Jan van der Stel , ir. Koen Meijer, ing. Cornelis Teerhuis, dr. Christiaan Zeijlstra, ir. Guus Keilman and ing. Maarten Ouwehand Tata Steel IJmuiden, The Netherlands Research, Development & Technology IEAGHG/IETS Iron and steel Industry CCUS and Process Integration Workshop Tokyo, Japan 4 – 7 November 2013 Confidential Content 1. HIsarna technology 2. HIsarna and CCS 3. HIsarna pilot plant 4. Campaign results 5. Conclusions 6. Forward plan 2 IEAGHG/IETS Iron and steel Industry CCUS and Process Integration Workshop , Tokyo, Japan, 4 – 7 November 2013. Confidential Ulcos IEAGHG/IETS Iron and steel Industry CCUS and Process Integration Workshop , Tokyo, Japan, 4 – 7 November 2013. Confidential 1. HIsarna technology Comparison with the BF route Blast furnace sinter Iron ore coke Liquid iron coal 4 IEAGHG/IETS Iron and steel Industry CCUS and Process Integration Workshop , Tokyo, Japan, 4 – 7 November 2013. Confidential 1. HIsarna technology Comparison with the BF route Blast furnace sinter Iron ore coke coal Direct use of coal and ore Liquid iron No coking and agglomeration 5 IEAGHG/IETS Iron and steel Industry CCUS and Process Integration Workshop , Tokyo, Japan, 4 – 7 November 2013. Confidential 1. HIsarna technology Top gas Oxygen Ore Oxygen Coal Slag Hot metal 6 IEAGHG/IETS Iron and steel Industry CCUS and Process Integration Workshop , Tokyo, Japan, 4 – 7 November 2013. Confidential 1.1. HIsarna technology Melting cyclone technology Melting and partial reduction of fine iron ores “2 Fe 2O3(s) + 2 CO(g) → 4 FeO(l) + 2 CO 2(g) ” • The cyclone product is a molten mixture of Fe 3O4 and FeO (~ 20 % reduced) • Pure oxygen is injected to generate the required melting temperature • The fines are separated from the gas by centrifugal flow of the gas IEAGHG/IETS Iron and steel Industry CCUS and Process Integration Workshop , Tokyo, Japan, 4 – 7 November 2013.
  • Coal Characteristics

    Coal Characteristics

    CCTR Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research COAL CHARACTERISTICS CCTR Basic Facts File # 8 Brian H. Bowen, Marty W. Irwin The Energy Center at Discovery Park Purdue University CCTR, Potter Center, 500 Central Drive West Lafayette, IN 47907-2022 http://www.purdue.edu/dp/energy/CCTR/ Email: [email protected] October 2008 1 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL FORMATION As geological processes apply pressure to peat over time, it is transformed successively into different types of coal Source: Kentucky Geological Survey http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/images/peatcoal.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/coalform.htm&h=354&w=579&sz= 20&hl=en&start=5&um=1&tbnid=NavOy9_5HD07pM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=134&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcoal%2Bphotos%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX 2 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL ANALYSIS Elemental analysis of coal gives empirical formulas such as: C137H97O9NS for Bituminous Coal C240H90O4NS for high-grade Anthracite Coal is divided into 4 ranks: (1) Anthracite (2) Bituminous (3) Sub-bituminous (4) Lignite Source: http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=4929705428518&lang=en-US&mkt=en-US&FORM=CVRE8 3 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR BITUMINOUS COAL Bituminous Coal: Great pressure results in the creation of bituminous, or “soft” coal. This is the type most commonly used for electric power generation in the U.S. It has a higher heating value than either lignite or sub-bituminous, but less than that of anthracite. Bituminous coal
  • Spontaneous Combustion of South American Coal

    Spontaneous Combustion of South American Coal

    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2016 Spontaneous Combustion of South American Coal Brunno C. C. Vieira Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Vieira, Brunno C. C., "Spontaneous Combustion of South American Coal" (2016). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6875. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6875 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Spontaneous Combustion of South American Coal Brunno C. C. Vieira Thesis submitted to the Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mining Engineering Yi Luo, Ph.D., Chair Felicia Peng, Ph.D. Brijes Mishra, Ph.D. Department of Mining Engineering Morgantown, West Virginia 2016 Keywords: Spontaneous Combustion, Coal, South American, Safety, Mine fires, Self- heating temperature Copyright 2016 Brunno C. C. Vieira Abstract Many causes can lead to mine fires and explosions in coal mines but one of the most relevant cause is the spontaneous combustion of coal.
  • Lecture 32: Coke Production

    Lecture 32: Coke Production

    NPTEL – Chemical – Chemical Technology II Lecture 32: Coke production 32.1 Introduction Coal is used as fuel for electric power generation, industrial heating and steam generation, domestic heating, rail roads and for coal processing. Coal composition is denoted by rank. Rank increases with the carbon content and decreases with increasing oxygen content. Many of the products made by hydrogenation, oxidation, hydrolysis or fluorination are important for industrial use. Stable, low cost, petroleum and natural gas supplies has arose interest in some of the coal products as upgraded fuels to reduce air pollution as well as to take advantage of greater ease of handling of the liquid or gaseous material and to utilize existing facilities such as pipelines and furnaces. 32.2 Coking of coal Raw material is Bituminous coal. It appears to have specific internal surfaces in the range of 30 to 100m2/g. Generally one ton of bituminous coal produces 1400 lb of coke. 10 gallons of tar. Chemical reaction:- 4(C3H4)n nC6H6 + 5nC + 3nH2 + nCH4 Coal Benzene Coke Lighter hydrocarbon Joint initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 1 of 9 NPTEL – Chemical – Chemical Technology II Process flow sheet: Illustrated in Figure. Figure 32.1 Flow sheet of coking of coal 32.3 Functional role of each unit (Figure 32.1): (a) Coal crusher and screening: At first Bituminous coal is crushed and screened to a certain size. Preheating of coal (at 150-250˚C) is done to reduce coking time without loss of coal quality. Briquetting increases strength of coke produced and to make non - coking or poorly coking coals to be used as metallurgical coke.
  • Proposal for Development of Dry Coking/Coal

    Proposal for Development of Dry Coking/Coal

    Development of Coking/Coal Gasification Concept to Use Indiana Coal for the Production of Metallurgical Coke, Liquid Transportation Fuels, Fertilizer, and Bulk Electric Power Phase II Final Report September 30, 2007 Submitted by Robert Kramer, Ph.D. Director, Energy Efficiency and Reliability Center Purdue University Calumet Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ………………………………………………..…………… 3 List of Figures …………………………………………………………………… 5 List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………. 6 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………… 7 Process Description ……………………………………………………………. 11 Importance to Indiana Coal Use ……………………………………………… 36 Relevance to Previous Studies ………………………………………………. 40 Policy, Scientific and Technical Barriers …………………………………….. 49 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………. 50 Appendix ………………………………………………………………………… 52 2 Executive Summary Coke is a solid carbon fuel and carbon source produced from coal that is used to melt and reduce iron ore. Although coke is an absolutely essential part of iron making and foundry processes, currently there is a shortfall of 5.5 million tons of coke per year in the United States. The shortfall has resulted in increased imports and drastic increases in coke prices and market volatility. For example, coke delivered FOB to a Chinese port in January 2004 was priced at $60/ton, but rose to $420/ton in March 2004 and in September 2004 was $220/ton. This makes clear the likelihood that prices will remain high. This effort that is the subject of this report has considered the suitability of and potential processes for using Indiana coal for the production of coke in a mine mouth or local coking/gasification-liquefaction process. Such processes involve multiple value streams that reduce technical and economic risk. Initial results indicate that it is possible to use blended coal with up to 40% Indiana coal in a non recovery coke oven to produce pyrolysis gas that can be selectively extracted and used for various purposes including the production of electricity and liquid transportation fuels and possibly fertilizer and hydrogen.
  • THE GUIDE to SOLID FUELS This Leaflet Will Tell You All You Need To

    THE GUIDE to SOLID FUELS This Leaflet Will Tell You All You Need To

    THE GUIDE TO SOLID FUELS This leaflet will tell you all you need to know about: • The different solid fuels available and their suitability for the various types of appliances • Smoke control legislation • Buying solid fuel • Hints on getting the best from your fuel and appliance Choice of Fuel There are a great many different solid fuels for sale. Your choice will be based on a number of criteria, the most important of which will be the type of appliance you will be burning the fuel on and whether or not you live in a smoke control area (see page 4). Fuels for open fires Housecoal The most traditional fuel for open fires is housecoal. It is available in various sizes e.g. Large Cobbles, Cobbles, Trebles and Doubles. The larger sizes are usually a little more expensive than Doubles size. Housecoal comes from mines in Britain and other parts of the world, most notably Columbia and Indonesia. The coal may be sold by the name of the colliery it comes from e.g. Daw Mill, the port of entry e.g. Merseyport or a merchant’s own brand name, e.g. Stirling. Coal merchants also frequently sell the coal by grade – 1, 2 and 3 or A, B and C; 1 and A being the best quality. Wood Wood and logs can be burnt on open fires. They should be well-seasoned and preferably have a low resin content. You should not use any wood that has any kind of coating on the surface e.g. varnish or paint, as harmful gases may be emitted on burning.
  • Maceral Types and Quality of Coal in the Tuli Coalfield: a Case

    Maceral Types and Quality of Coal in the Tuli Coalfield: a Case

    applied sciences Article Maceral Types and Quality of Coal in the Tuli Coalfield: A Case Study of Coal in the Madzaringwe Formation in the Vele Colliery, Limpopo Province, South Africa Elelwani Denge * and Christopher Baiyegunhi Department of Geology and Mining, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Featured Application: Authors are encouraged to provide a concise description of the specific application or a potential application of the work. This section is not mandatory. Abstract: The Madzaringwe Formation in the Vele colliery is one of the coal-bearing Late Palaeozoic units of the Karoo Supergroup, consisting of shale with thin coal seams and sandstones. Maceral group analysis was conducted on seven representative coal samples collected from three existing boreholes—OV125149, OV125156, and OV125160—in the Vele colliery to determine the coal rank and other intrinsic characteristics of the coal. The petrographic characterization revealed that vitrinite is the dominant maceral group in the coals, representing up to 81–92 vol.% (mmf) of the total sample. Collotellinite is the dominant vitrinite maceral, with a total count varying between 52.4 vol.% (mmf) and 74.9 vol.% (mmf), followed by corpogelinite, collodetrinite, tellinite, and pseudovitrinite with a Citation: Denge, E.; Baiyegunhi, C. count ranging between 0.8 and 19.4 vol.% (mmf), 1.5 and 17.5 vol.% (mmf), 0.8 and 6.5 vol.% (mmf) Maceral Types and Quality of Coal in the Tuli Coalfield: A Case Study of and 0.3 and 5.9 vol.% (mmf), respectively. The dominance of collotellinite gives a clear indication Coal in the Madzaringwe Formation that the coals are derived from the parenchymatous and woody tissues of roots, stems, and leaves.
  • Handbook of Coal Analysis

    Handbook of Coal Analysis

    HANDBOOK OF COAL ANALYSIS James G. Speight A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION HANDBOOK OF COAL ANALYSIS HANDBOOK OF COAL ANALYSIS James G. Speight A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION Copyright 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate.
  • A Life Cycle Analysis of Deploying Coking Technology to Utilize Low-Rank Coal in China

    A Life Cycle Analysis of Deploying Coking Technology to Utilize Low-Rank Coal in China

    sustainability Article A Life Cycle Analysis of Deploying Coking Technology to Utilize Low-Rank Coal in China Yan Li 1, Guoshun Wang 1, Zhaohao Li 2, Jiahai Yuan 3 , Dan Gao 2,* and Heng Zhang 2 1 School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (G.W.) 2 School of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China; [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (H.Z.) 3 School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 May 2020; Accepted: 10 June 2020; Published: 15 June 2020 Abstract: At present, the excess capacity in China’s coke industry can be deployed to utilize some low-rank coal, replacing coking coal with potential economic gains, energy efficiency, and environmental benefits. This study presents a life cycle analysis to model these potential benefits by comparing a metallurgical coke technical pathway with technical pathways of gasification coke integrated with different chemical productions. The results show that producing gasification coke is a feasible technical pathway for the transformation and development of the coke industry. However, its economic feasibility depends on the price of cokes and coals. The gasification coke production has higher energy consumption and CO2 emissions because of its lower coke yield. Generally speaking, using gasification coke to produce F-T oils has higher economic benefits than producing methanol, but has lower energy efficiency and higher carbon emissions. Keywords: coal coking; life cycle analysis; gasification coke; metallurgical coke; low-rank coal 1.