DOCSLIB.ORG

The London Gazette, August 30, 1898

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London Gazette, August 30, 1898 5216 THE LONDON GAZETTE, AUGUST 30, 1898. DISEASES OF ANIMALS ACTS, 1894 AND 1896. RETURN of OUTBREAKS of the undermentioned DISEASES for the Week ended August 27th, 1898, distinguishing Counties fincluding Boroughs*). ANTHRAX. GLANDERS (INCLUDING FARCY). County. Outbreaks Animals Animals reported. Attacked. which Animals remainec reported Oui^ Diseased during ENGLAND. No. No. County. breaks at the the reported. end of Week Northampton 2 6 the pre- as At- Notts 1 1 vious tacked. Somerset 1 1 week. Wilts 1 1 WALES. ENGLAND. No. No. No. 1 Carmarthen 1 1 London 0 15 Middlesex 1 • *• 1 Norfolk 1 SCOTLAND. Kirkcudbright 1 1 SCOTLAND. Wigtown . ... 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 8 " 12 TOTAL 10 3 17 * For convenience Berwick-upon-Tweed is considered to be in Northumberland, Dudley is con- sidered to be in Worcestershire, Stockport is considered to be in Cheshire, and the city of London ia considered to be in the county of London. ORDERS AS TO MUZZLING DOGS, Southampton. Boroughs of Portsmouth, and THE Board of Agriculture have by Order pre- Winchester (15 October, 1897). scribed, as from the dates mentioned, the Kent.—(1.) The petty sessional divisions of Muzzling of Dogs in the districts and parts of Rochester, Bearstead, Mailing, Cranbrook, Tun- districts of Local Authorities, as follows :—• bridge Wells, Tunbridge, Sevenoaks, Bromley, Berkshire.—The petty sessional divisions of and Dartford (except such portions of the petty Reading, Wokinghana, Maidenhead, and sessional divisions of Bromley and Dartford as Windsor, and the municipal borough of are subject to the provisions of the City and Maidenhead, m the county of Berks. Boroughs Metropolitan Police Districts (Muzzling of of Reading, and Windsor (New) (1 October, Dogs) Temporary Order of 1897), and the 1897). municipal borough of Tenterden, in the county of Kent. Boroughs of Chatham, Gravesend, Buckinghamshire.—The petty sessional divisions Maidstone, Rochester, and Tunbridge Wells oi the Hundred of Stoke, the Hundred of (2 November, 1897). Burnham (exclusive of the Chesham Divi- (2.) The following petty sessional divisions, sion), the Hundred of Desborough (First namely Faversham, Home, Ramsgate, Ashford, Division), and the Hundred of Desborough Elham,Wingham; the liberty of Romney Marsh; (Second J'ivision), in the county of Bucking- the municipal boroughs of Deal, Faversham, ham. Borough of" Chopping (or High) Hythe, Lydd, New Romney, and Sandwich ; and Wycombed October, 1897). the Cinque Port liberties as have not separate City and Metropolitan Police'Districts.--County Commissions of the Peace ; in the county of of London, County of Middlesex, City of Kent. Boroughs of Canterbury, Dover, London, Borough of Croydon, Borough of Folkestone, Margate, and Ramsgate (15 Kingston-cm-Thames, Borough of Richmond February, 1898). (Surrey), Borough of West Ham. Such parts of the Counties of Essex, Hertford, Kent, and Lancashire.—County of Lancaster (except the Surrey as are situate within the Metropolitan Hundred of Lonsdale North of the Sands). Police District (6 April, 1897). Boroughs of Accrington, Ashton-under-Lyne, Bacup, Blackburn, Blackpool, Bolton, Bootle, Hampshire.—(1.) The petty sessional division ol Burnley, Bury, Chorley, Clitheroe, Colne, Dar- Odihana, the parishes of Mortimer West End, wen, Eccles, Haslingden, Heywooil, Lancaster, Silchester, Bramley, Sherfield-upon-Loddon, Liverpool, Manchester, Middleton, Mossley, Hartley Wespall (including a detached part of Nelson, Oldham, Preston, Rawtenstttll, Roch- this parish lying to the north of the parish of dale, St. Helens, Salford, Southport, Warring- Newnham), Stratfield Turgis, and Stratfield ton, Widnes, and Wigan (1 June, 1897). Saye, in the county of Southampton (1 October, 1897). Oxfordshire.—The petty sessional divisions of (2.) The petty sessional divisions of Alton, Watlington, and Henley, and the municipal Winchester, Petersfield (including the detached borough of Henley-upon-Thames, in the county part of the petty sessional division of Peters- of Oxford (1 October, 1897). field (at Bramshot), Droxford, Fareham, and Staffordshire.—The petty sessional divisions of Basingstoke (except such portion of the petty Penkridge, Rugeley, Lichfield and Brownhills, sessional division of Basingstokc as is subject Tamworth, Wolverhampton, Bilston, Sedgley, to the provisions of the Hampshire (Muzzling Willenhall, Rushall, Handsworth, Smethwick, of Dogs) Order of 1897), and the municipal Wednesbury, Tipton, Rowley Regis, and King- borough of Basingstoke, in the county of swinford and Wordsley, in the county of.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abercrombie's Green-Wedge Vision for London: the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944
    Abercrombie’s green-wedge vision for London: the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944 Abstract This paper analyses the role that the green wedges idea played in the main official reconstruction plans for London, namely the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944. Green wedges were theorised in the first decade of the twentieth century and discussed in multifaceted ways up to the end of the Second World War. Despite having been prominent in many plans for London, they have been largely overlooked in planning history. This paper argues that green wedges were instrumental in these plans to the formulation of a more modern, sociable, healthier and greener peacetime London. Keywords: Green wedges, green belt, reconstruction, London, planning Introduction Green wedges have been theorised as an essential part of planning debates since the beginning of the twentieth century. Their prominent position in texts and plans rivalled that of the green belt, despite the comparatively disproportionate attention given to the latter by planning historians (see, for example, Purdom, 1945, 151; Freestone, 2003, 67–98; Ward, 2002, 172; Sutcliffe, 1981a; Amati and Yokohari, 1997, 311–37). From the mid-nineteenth century, the provision of green spaces became a fundamental aspect of modern town planning (Dümpelmann, 2005, 75; Dal Co, 1980, 141–293). In this context, the green wedges idea emerged as a solution to the need to provide open spaces for growing urban areas, as well as to establish a direct 1 connection to the countryside for inner city dwellers. Green wedges would also funnel fresh air, greenery and sunlight into the urban core.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • MORTIMER WEST END PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting Of
    MORTIMER WEST END PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting of the Council Date: Wednesday 8th June 2016 Time: 7.35pm Place: Mortimer West End Village Hall Present: Cllr Robertson (Chair) Cllr Thurlow (Vice Chair) Cllr Brown In Attendance: Christine McGarvie (Clerk) 0 members of the public Aimee Scott- Molloy – PCSO Cllr Marilyn Tucker (Borough) Cllr Keith Chapman (County) Apologies: Cllr Gardiner (Borough) Action 1 Apologies for Absence None. 2 Declarations of Interest None. 3 Minutes of the Last Parish Council Meeting and the AGM 3.1 It was unanimously agreed that the minutes of the meeting held 27th April 2016 were a true and accurate record. It was unanimously agreed that the minutes of the AGM meeting held 17th May 2016 were a true and accurate record. The minutes were signed by the Chairman. Minutes of the APM to be signed at the next meeting. 3.2 Matters arising None 4 Open Forum 4.1 The Chairman invited questions and comments from those present. Aimee Scott-Molloy, the Police Community Support Officer gave a report on policing in the parish. The main problem they are dealing with is motorbikes Clerk on the Englefield estate which is cross border ie. West Berkshire and Hampshire. There has recently been a fire in the forest which is suspected to be arson. In May there were 2 incidents of motorbikes on the estate and there have been upwards of 15 reports in other months. There were 2 burglaries in May, one was a non-dwelling shed on Park Lane and second was a burglary on Simms Lane where a significant amount of jewellery was stolen.
    [Show full text]
  • TWICE a CITIZEN Celebrating a Century of Service by the Territorial Army in London
    TWICE A CITIZEN Celebrating a century of service by the Territorial Army in London www.TA100.co.uk The Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Association for Greater London Twice a Citizen “Every Territorial is twice a citizen, once when he does his ordinary job and the second time when he dons his uniform and plays his part in defence.” This booklet has been produced as a souvenir of the celebrations for the Centenary of the Territorial Field Marshal William Joseph Slim, Army in London. It should be remembered that at the time of the formation of the Rifle Volunteers 1st Viscount Slim, KG, GCB, GCMG, GCVO, GBE, DSO, MC in 1859, there was no County of London, only the City. Surrey and Kent extended to the south bank of the Thames, Middlesex lay on the north bank and Essex bordered the City on the east. Consequently, units raised in what later became the County of London bore their old county names. Readers will learn that Londoners have much to be proud of in their long history of volunteer service to the nation in its hours of need. From the Boer War in South Africa and two World Wars to the various conflicts in more recent times in The Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan, London Volunteers and Territorials have stood together and fought alongside their Regular comrades. Some have won Britain’s highest award for valour - the Victoria Cross - and countless others have won gallantry awards and many have made the ultimate sacrifice in serving their country. This booklet may be recognised as a tribute to all London Territorials who have served in the past, to those who are currently serving and to those who will no doubt serve in the years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Gb0046 D-Ebz
    GB 0046 D/EBz Hertfordshire Archives and Local Studies This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 38720 The National Archives HERTFORDSHIRE RECORD OFFICE D/EBz Deeds and other papers relating to Barnet and other parishes in Hertfordshire and Middlesex, 17th - 20th centuries, deposited between 1987 and 1992 by Messrs Boyes, Sutton and Perry. [Accessions 2292, 2414, 2693, 2711, 2733] Catalogue completed July 1993 EG HERTFORDSHIRE RECORD OFFICE D/EBz TITLE DEEDS Arkley D/EBz/T l 2 Jones Cottages 1863 ­ 1958 [Descent of title: James George Longham of Holborn, Middlesex, gent; William Temple of Sarratt, beer retailer; Henry Jones of Barnet, builder; Catherine Matilda Jones of Arkley, spinster; and Sidney John Bateman and his wife Florence [Original bundle] 14 items Barnet D/EBz/T2 Deed of Common Recovery concerning land in the 17 Dec 1825 manor of Chipping Barnet between Chadwick Marriott Walker Aytown of Edinburgh esq and his wife Eliza and Robert Longford of Gravesden, Kent, yeoman and his wife Jane D/EBz/T3 Abstract of the title of Messrs Morland and 1854 Wilkinson to freehold estates in Chipping Barnet and East Barnet D/EBz/T4 Unspecified land in High Barnet 1923 [Descent of title: William Hayes of Little Wittenham, Buckinghamshire, and Richard Raymond Weale of New Barnet] 2 items D/EBz/T5 32 Wood Street 1920 - 1966 [Descent of title: Henry Bennett of Hounslow, Middlesex, gent; Victor Alphonso Merchant of Barnet, general dealer; Annie Nellie Merchant of Barnet, wife of the above; Dorothy Bath of Barnet, married woman; Hubert Michael Cresswell Corfield of London, M.D ; and Marjorie Bateman of Barnet, widow] 11 items D/EBz/T6 5,6,7,8,9,10 Thornton Road - George Dickinson 1889 - 1918 Byfield of the City of London, gent to Samuel Dorman of North Finchley, Middlesex, estate agent; 8,9,10 Thornton Road - George Dickinson Byfield to William Marcos of Wandsworth, Surrey, gent; and 12,13,14 Thornton Road - William continued ..
    [Show full text]
  • 67 - County of London Sessions
    RESEARCH GUIDE 67 - County of London Sessions CONTENTS Introduction References and Catalogues Judicial Records Mental Deficiency Acts Licensing Records Indexes of records deposited with the Clerk of the Peace Parliamentary Deposited Plans Other copies of Parliamentary Deposited Plans Other Plans Highway Diversion and Stopping Up Orders Electrical Lighting Provisional Orders Introduction This research guide is a brief introduction to some of the more used series of records of the County of London Sessions. Until 1971 the Justices of the Peace for each county and many boroughs were responsible for holding Sessions of the Peace where criminal cases were tried before a jury. These were usually known as the Quarter Sessions because originally they were held four times a year, but in London they were held every month. More serious cases such as murder, rape, blasphemy, bigamy, libel, certain types of bribery and forgery, and offences under the Official Secrets Acts, were referred to the Central Criminal Court or outside London, to the assizes. The Justices also had other responsibilities including the confirmation of new licences granted to public houses, the stopping up and diversion of highways, and the registration and deposit of maps and documents for public record. The County of London was a new county which was formed in April 1889 from part of Middlesex north of the Thames and parts of Kent and Surrey south of the Thames. The Local Government Act 1888 which created the County of London also provided for a new court of quarter sessions which was given jurisdiction over the whole of the new administrative county except for the City of London which retained its own quarter sessions, the City of London Sessions, whose records are held by London Metropolitan Archives (CLA/047).
    [Show full text]
  • A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 Years On
    2 July 2010 A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 years on Tony Travers and Christine Whitehead A brief history… It is 10 years since the Greater London Authority was created as a metropolitan or regional tier of government for London. There have been five different arrangements of ‘upper tier’ government in the capital since the Metropolitan Board of Works (MBW) was created in 1855 to build infrastructure. The MBW was succeeded by the London County Council (LCC), a powerful authority for the inner part of the contemporary city. Within this area 28 metropolitan boroughs and the City of London delivered ‘local’ services. Two factors were particularly important in influencing the progress of London’s government. First, the physical expansion of the city created demands for provision across a wider area than the City of London’s original and long-evolved ‘square mile’. The Metropolitan Police Service was created by the government in 1829 to meet the law and order requirements of a fast-growing city. The squalor and chaos of the London of the 1850s prompted Parliament to legislate for London’s first-ever metropolitan government, an indirectly-elected entity. Further physical expansion between the end of the 19 th century and 1939 generated a debate about the need for a ‘Greater London’ government 1. The second important factor in determining the kinds of institutions that emerged was the local power and parochialism of both the City of London and the parish-based or ad hoc bodies that developed to deliver services in the absence of a city-wide government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Post-War Reconstruction Planning of London: a Wider Perspective
    Centre for Environment and Society Research Working Paper series no. 8 The post-war reconstruction planning of London: a wider perspective Peter J Larkham and David Adams The post-war reconstruction planning of London: a wider perspective Peter J Larkham Professor of Planning and David Adams Lecturer in Planning Birmingham School of the Built Environment, Birmingham City University Working Paper Series, no. 8 2011 ISBN 978-1-904839-54-5 © Authors, 2011 Published by Birmingham City University Centre for Environment and Society Research Faculty of Technology, Engineering and the Environment City Centre campus, Millennium Point, Curzon Street, Birmingham, B4 7XG, UK iii CONTENTS Abstract v Acknowledgements v Introduction 1 The context of regional-scale planning 4 The hierarchy of planning for London 6 A hierarchy of planning 6 Greater London Plan 7 MARS 10 RIBA London Regional Reconstruction Committee plan 12 “A plan for ‘Greater London” 13 County of London Plan 14 City of London plans (1) Improvements and Town Planning Committee 17 City of London plans (2): Holden and Holford 20 City of London plans (3) Royal Academy 22 City of London plans (4) Less formal 27 Borough-level plans 29 Overview: planners and planning 31 Conclusions 33 Status of competing plans 34 Material and non-material considerations 35 Scale of activity 36 Implementation: the future 37 References 39 Bibliography and resources 46 iv Illustrations, Tables and Text Boxes Figure 1: Schematic representation of clustering of London-related Planning activity 3 Figure 2: The MARS plan 11 Figure 3: The Trystan Edwards / Hundred New Towns Association plan 14 Figure 4: Map of social and functional areas (the “egg diagram”) 16 Figure 5: North part of ring road looking south, J.D.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planning Game—English Style Or the Greater London Development Plan, 7 Urb
    Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 7 January 1974 The lP anning game—English Style or the Greater London Development Plan Victor Moore Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Victor Moore, The Planning game—English Style or the Greater London Development Plan, 7 Urb. L. Ann. 57 (1974) Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw/vol7/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PLANNING GAME-ENGLISH STYLE OR THE GREATER LONDON DEVELOPMENT PLAN VICTOR MOORE* Anglophiles will be aware that since the statute Quia Emptores in the year 1290, no single piece of legislation has made as great an im- pact on English land law as that brought about by the Town and Country Planning Act of 1947.1 The lynchpin of that legislation, which gave to England its first comprehensive statutory machinery for controlling land use, was that no landowner could develop his land without first obtaining permission from the local planning authority.2 The content of the development plan which local plan- ning authorities were required to prepare for their areas determined whether permission would be granted, or granted subject to condi- tions, or whether the planning authority would begin cease and desist proceedings if development commenced without permission.' The history of these development plans is well known.
    [Show full text]
  • Division Arrangements for Hartley Wintney & Yateley West
    Mortimer West End Silchester Stratfield Saye Bramshill Heckfield Eversley Yateley Stratfield Turgis Calleva Pamber Bramley Mattingley Hartley Wespall Hartley Wintney & Yateley West Yateley East & Blackwater Blackwater and Hawley Hartley Wintney Farnborough North Sherborne St. John Sherfield on Loddon Rotherwick Farnborough West Elvetham Heath Chineham Fleet Hook Fleet Town Basingstoke North Winchfield Farnborough South Newnham Old Basing and Lychpit Loddon Church Crookham Basingstoke Central Odiham & Hook Dogmersfield Crookham Village Mapledurwell and Up Nately Church Crookham & Ewshot Greywell Aldershot North Basingstoke South East Odiham Ewshot Winslade Aldershot South Candovers, Oakley & Overton Crondall Cliddesden South Warnborough Tunworth Upton Grey Farleigh Wallop Long Sutton County Division Parishes 0 0.75 1.5 3 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 Hartley Wintney & Yateley West © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD Division Arrangements for 100049926 2016 Emsworth & St Faiths North West Havant Hayling Island County Division Parishes 0 0.4 0.8 1.6 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 Hayling Island © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD Division Arrangements for 100049926 2016 Durley Bishops Waltham West End & Horton Heath West End Botley & Hedge End North Hedge End Curdridge Hedge End & West End South Meon Valley Botley Bursledon Hound Hamble Fareham Sarisbury Whiteley County Division Parishes 0 0.275 0.55 1.1 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of the Modern Metropolis: Evidence from London
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE MAKING OF THE MODERN METROPOLIS: EVIDENCE FROM LONDON Stephan Heblich Stephen J. Redding Daniel M. Sturm Working Paper 25047 http://www.nber.org/papers/w25047 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2018 We are grateful to Bristol University, the London School of Economics, and Princeton University for research support. Heblich also acknowledges support from the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) Grant No. INO15-00025. We would like to thank Victor Couture, Jonathan Dingel, Ed Glaeser, Vernon Henderson, Petra Moser, Leah Platt-Boustan, Will Strange, Claudia Steinwender, Jerry White, Christian Wolmar and conference and seminar participants at Berkeley, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), Dartmouth, EIEF Rome, German Economic Association, Harvard, MIT, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), University College London (UCL), Urban Economics Association (UEA), Vienna, Yale, Zoom Urban Seminar, and Zurich for helpful comments. We would like to thank David Green for sharing printed copies of the Henry Poole data and T. Wangyal Shawa for his help with the GIS data. We would also like to thank the Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure, the British Library (BL), the British Library of Political and Economic Science (BLPES) at the London School of Economics, the Guildhall Library, London Metropolitan Archives (LMA), and the Omnibus Society for their help with data. Finally, we are grateful to Charoo Anand, Iain Bamford, Horst Braeunlich, Dennis Egger, Andreas Ferrara, Ben Glaeser and Florian Trouvain for excellent research assistance. The usual disclaimer applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Polling Stations Ancells Farm Community Centre, 1 Falkners
    Polling Stations Ancells Farm Community Centre, 1 Falkners Close, Ancells Farm, GU51 2XF Annexe Preston Candover Village Hall, Preston Candover, Basingstoke, RG25 2EP Bramley C E Primary School, Bramley Lane, Bramley, RG26 5AH Bramley Village Hall, The Street, Bramley, RG26 5BP Catherine of Aragon (Private House), Pilcot Hill, RG27 8SX Church Crookham Baptist Church, 64 Basingbourne Road, Fleet, GU52 6TH Church Crookham Community Centre, Boyce Road, (Off Jubilee Drive and Gurung Way), GU52 8AQ Civic Offices - Side Entrance (A & B), Adjacent to the Citizens Advice Bureau, Hart District Council, GU51 4AE Civic Offices - Main Entrance (C & D), Hart District Council, Harlington Way, GU51 4AE Cliddesden Millennium Village Hall, Cliddesden, Basingstoke, RG25 2JQ Crondall Church Rooms, Croft Lane, GU10 5QF Crookham Street Social Club, The Street, Crookham Village, GU51 5SJ Darby Green & Frogmore Social Hall, Frogmore Road, Blackwater, GU17 0NP Ellisfield Memorial Hall, Church Lane, Ellisfield, RG25 2QR Eversley Village Hall, Reading Road, Eversley, RG27 0LX Ewshot Village Hall, Tadpole Lane, Ewshot, GU10 5BX Farleigh Wallop Clubroom, The Avenue, Farleigh Wallop, RG25 2HU Greywell Village Hall, The Street, Greywell, RG29 1BZ Hart Leisure Centre, Emerald Avenue, Off Hitches Lane, GU51 5EE Hawley Memorial Hall, Fernhill Road, Hawley Green, GU17 9BW Heckfield Memorial Hall, Church Lane, Heckfield, RG27 0LG Herriard Royal British Legion Hall, Herriard, RG25 2PG Holy Trinity Church Hall (Cana Room), Bowenhurst Road, Off Aldershot Road, GU52 8JU Long
    [Show full text]