DOCSLIB.ORG

Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (On Microfilm) Surname

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (On Microfilm) Surname Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (on microfilm) Surname Given Name Year Roll Comment or Following on film (NG) Horace 1897 3 Hopk Aasted George, dau of 1901 1 Asse Abati Jean 1900 1 Abbott Alice 1897 1 Abbott Bernice Maud 1893 [2] 1 Abbott Rosina Marie Burke 1901 1 Abbott W S, son of 1891 1 Abbuhl Katharina Huggler 1901 1 Abe Yasuzo 1900 1 Abelson Olga Gunvilda 1896 1 Aber Mathew, son of 1893 1 Abernatha Ira F 1900 1 Abernatha Louisa Loper 1902 1 Abernethy F A (Male) 1899 1 Abernethy George 1899 1 Abplanalp Margaretha Elisabeth 1892 1 Abraham Charley 1894 1 Abraham Esther 1891 1 Abraham Hyman 1896 1 Abraham James 1893 1 Abraham Samuel 1896 1 Abraham Solomon 1901 1 Abrahansen Swan 1894 1 Abrahanson Christensen 1892 1 Abrams Esther 1891 1 Abrams Martha Evelyn 1891 1 Abrams Matilda 1892 1 Abrams Moses 1897 1 Abramson Harvey Peter 1892 1 Abramson Hazel C 1902 1 Achilles Shubell C 1894 1 Achison J W (Male) 1898 1 Ackerman Esther Jane 1896 1 Ackerman Henry 1899 1 Ackroyd G R, son of 1896 1 Adair E C (Mrs) 1900 1 Adams Allen Hays 1896 1 Adams Annie 1895 1 Adams Charles W 1901 1 Adams Eliza J 1894 1 Adams Emma S Ohler 1902 1 Adams Florence Landes 1902 1 Adams Fred'k 1900 1 Adams Geo W, son of 1895 1 Adams Henry Augustus 1896 1 Adams Howard W 1900 1 Adams Isaac 1898 1 Adams Maria 1898 1 Adams Nellie 1895 1 Adams Peter 1895 1 © 2021 Genealogical Forum of Oregon Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (on microfilm) Surname Given Name Year Roll Comment or Following on film Adams Robert 1899 1 Adams Thomas 1892 [2] 1 Adams Warren Lloyd 1897 1 Adams Wm H 1902 1 Adamy Domanick Henry 1900 1 Adcox Jane 1900 1 Addis G R (Male) 1902 1 Adler J W, child of 1892 [2] 1 Adler Jacob Jerome 1891 1 Adler Julia 1892 1 Agar Caldwell 1897 [2] 1 Agar Priscilla Caroline 1896 1 Ahearn Mary A 1900 1 Ahles Joseph 1898 1 Ahlgren John 1900 1 Ahpel William H 1895 [3] 1 Aien Knute 1891 1 Amac Ainslie George 1900 1 Amac Ainslie Larrissa Elizabeth 1898 1 Amac Ainsworth Geo J 1895 1 Anib Akaki Chikara 1901 1 Amac Akin Alice 1899 1 Amac Akin Winnie 1899 1 Amac Akiyama K (Male) 1899 1 Amac Aklund John 1889 1 Amac Albee Charles S 1893 1 Amac Albers Hennina C 1899 1 Amac Albers Johann H 1897 1 Amac Albert Henry, son of 1894 1 Amac Albright Cynthia Burke 1901 1 Amac Albright Edward Lewis 1897 1 Amac Albright Edward S 1899 1 Amac Albright Kate Strang 1899 1 Amac Albright Susana 1895 1 Amac Alden Julia L 1901 1 Amac Alder G W (Female) 1894 1 Amac Aldermann Ella 1900 1 Amac Aldrich Carrie Ann 1898 1 Amac Aldrich Stephen W 1902 1 Amac Alexander Babston (Mrs) 1892 1 Amac Alexander Elizabeth 1895 1 Amac Alexander Hazel 1900 1 Amac Alexander James 1898 1 Amac Alexander Kalevro 1902 1 Amac Alexander Raymond L 1901 1 Amac Alexander S V (Female) 1892 1 Amac Alexander W B (Male) 1898 1 Amac Alexander W W (Male) 1898 1 Amac Alexanderson Constance W 1898 1 Amac Alfred Louis 1891 1 Amac © 2021 Genealogical Forum of Oregon Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (on microfilm) Surname Given Name Year Roll Comment or Following on film Allaesh Nicholas 1900 1 Amac Allan Agnes A 1900 1 Amac Allard Loronzo 1902 1 Amac Allebach K P (Male) 1898 1 Amac Allehoff Henry Alexander 1902 1 Amac Allehoff Louise 1891 1 Amac Alleisch Christ 1900 1 Amac Allen Angus T 1899 [2] 1 Amac Allen Barton H 1896 1 Amac Allen Charles 1901 1 Amac Allen Charles Rogers 1902 1 Amac Allen Clara B 1898 1 Amac Allen Domnick Charles 1902 1 Amac Allen Effie Arvilla 1901 1 Amac Allen Ernest A 1902 1 Amac Allen Florance F 1897 1 Amac Allen Frank B 1898 [2] 1 Amac Allen Grace 1900 1 Amac Allen Hariett S 1896 1 Amac Allen Harry 1900 1 Amac Allen John B 1897 1 Amac Allen Joseph F 1898 1 Amac Allen Laura A 1898 1 Amac Allen Lizzie 1899 1 Amac Allen Lizzie May 1893 [2] 1 Amac Allen Loretta 1893 1 Amac Allen Maggie 1894 1 Amac Allen Martha Ann Wixon 1901 1 Amac Allen Martha Electa 1892 1 Amac Allen Peter M 1899 1 Amac Allen Ruben 1900 1 Amac Allen Samuel Augustus 1890 1 Amac Allen Samuel Gordon 1892 1 Amac Allen Susan 1899 1 Amac Allen Thomas, child of 1899 1 Amac Allen Washington F 1899 1 Amac Allen William H 1902 1 Amac Allen William Orson 1895 1 Amac Allen Wm W 1902 1 Amac Allenbeck Ray 1893 1 Amac Allison Donald, son of 1894 1 Amac Allison Ellen 1895 1 Amac Allison J S, dau of 1901 1 Amac Allison Joseph, son of 1900 1 Amac Allison Mary A 1900 1 Amac Allison Samuel A 1898 1 Amac Allman Arthur 1900 1 Amac Allshouse George 1892 1 Amac Allstock Bernard J J 1884 1 Amac Allwen Caroline 1902 1 Amac © 2021 Genealogical Forum of Oregon Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (on microfilm) Surname Given Name Year Roll Comment or Following on film Allwen Philip 1897 1 Amac Alm Ole 1899 1 Amac Alm Walter 1899 1 Amac Almy William J 1900 1 Amac Alphonse Hyacinthe 1892 1 Amac Alsager Emel 1896 1 Amac Alsleben Theodore 1899 1 Amac Altman Marie 1896 1 Amac Altstock E J, son of 1902 1 Amac Alverson Stephen 1902 1 Amac Alvord Harold G 1902 1 Amac Amacher Charles 1902 1 Amacher Emma Enboden 1901 [2] 1 Amacher Louis 1900 1 Amato Providincia Campagna 1901 1 Amato Vustina 1901 1 Ambler Catherine Brill 1901 1 Ambruster Margaret 1892 1 Amell John 1899 [2] 1 Ames Alma M 1894 1 Ames Ida Ethel 1900 1 Ames John W 1902 1 Amidon Emma 1898 1 Amidon George W 1898 1 Ammann Jerome 1893 1 Ammonson Ellart 1899 1 Amore Frank 1897 1 Amsden Carroll E 1902 1 Andersen Anders Peter Martin 1891 1 Andersen Charles O 1894 1 Andersen John J, son of 1893 1 Andersen Lillie Ring Martha 1897 1 Andersen Mary 1894 1 Andersen Oscar Lawrence 1900 1 Anderson A C (Male) 1897 1 Anderson Albert 1900 1 Anderson Albert Mozart 1900 1 Anderson Albin 1893 [2] 1 Anderson Ana 1898 1 Anderson Andrew 1894 1 Anderson Andrew 1897 1 Anderson Andrew 1899 1 Anderson August 1898 1 Anderson August, dau of 1898 1 Anderson Augusta A Lindblon 1901 1 Anderson Belle Frances Bradley 1901 1 Anderson Bertha Christina 1900 1 Anderson Betty 1901 1 Anderson Carl August 1892 1 Anderson Carl Emil 1889 2 Even © 2021 Genealogical Forum of Oregon Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (on microfilm) Surname Given Name Year Roll Comment or Following on film Anderson Charles 1899 1 Anderson Christina 1899 1 Anderson Earl 1893 1 Anderson Edna, son of 1882 1 Anderson Edwin Virgil 1902 1 Anderson Emma Elizabeth 1891 1 Anderson Enoch Arthur 1899 1 Anderson Erland 1894 1 Anderson Eugene Burdick 1902 [2] 1 Anderson Fauntellar 1901 1 Anderson Francis H 1896 1 Anderson Genevieve Petrain 1901 1 Anderson Gilbert 1897 1 Anderson Hanns Jacob 1901 1 Anderson Harding Wilmer 1893 1 Anderson Harold 1898 1 Anderson Harry 1899 1 Anderson Harry N 1902 1 Anderson Henry 1889 1 Anderson Hilma 1898 1 Anderson Hulda Peterson 1902 1 Anderson Jacob A 1894 1 Anderson James 1902 1 Anderson Jennie 1898 1 Anderson Johanna Regina Kock 1902 1 Anderson John 1894 1 Anderson John 1897 1 Anderson John 1898 [2] 1 Anderson John H 1890 1 Anderson John P 1893 1 Anderson Joseph 1898 1 Anderson Julia A 1901 [2] 1 Anderson Katie 1895 1 Anderson Lizzie 1898 1 Anderson Louis 1894 1 Anderson M A (Female) 1891 1 Anderson M P (Male) 1898 1 Anderson Mack 1899 1 Anderson Mads 1895 1 Anderson Mary 1891 1 Anderson Mary 1895 1 Anderson Mary 1896 [2] 1 Anderson Mary Gertrude Hanson 1902 1 Anderson Maud A 1897 1 Anderson Mebane Wilson 1902 1 Anderson Merrel 1899 1 Anderson Naeme E 1892 [6] 1 Anderson Nels 1895 1 Anderson Nettie 1899 1 Anderson none given 1900 1 occ: minister © 2021 Genealogical Forum of Oregon Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (on microfilm) Surname Given Name Year Roll Comment or Following on film Anderson Olwyn Chester 1901 1 Anderson Peter 1900 1 Anderson Raymond Cecil 1901 1 Anderson Sarah B 1891 1 Anderson Walter 1902 1 Anderson William B 1902 1 Anderson William J 1893 [2] 1 Anderson Wm 1899 1 Andress I A (Male) 1893 1 Andrews Adeline Scott 1901 1 Andrews Crayton S, son of 1901 1 Andrews Harry 1899 1 Andrews Henry 1893 1 Andrews J H (Male) 1900 1 Andrews S P (Male) 1900 1 Andrus Raymond Clarence 1899 [2] 1 Andrus Wm H 1902 1 Angel John 1900 1 Angell Ama A 1892 1 Angell Elizabeth 1894 1 Angle C C (Male) 1898 1 Angle Horace Fredrick 1898 1 Angle Julia A 1899 1 Anibal Ed C, son of 1891 1 Anjola Rosa 1893 1 Anna Maria (Sister) nee Catherine Lamont 1902 5 Marg Ansmann Anna Marie 1900 1 Anson Mary Augusta Kimberlin 1902 1 Anthony Edward Hamlin 1892 1 Aok Kim (Mrs) 1899 4 Kilt Apla Bossadin 1894 1 Aplem George C 1889 1 Apple Rachael Pearl 1902 1 Arata Giuseppe 1902 1 Arata Maria 1894 1 Arata Nicholas 1893 1 Aratani M (Male) 1899 1 Archer Mary E Hegey 1901 1 Archibald John 1892 1 Ardueser Casper, son of 1897 1 Arenling George G 1895 1 Ark Den 1893 1 Arkiles Edward 1899 1 Arla May 1896 1 Armitage George Henry 1893 1 Armstrong Alexander 1890 1 Armstrong child (Male) 1892 1 Armstrong Edward R 1897 1 Armstrong Francis 1 Armstrong James 1896 1 © 2021 Genealogical Forum of Oregon Portland Death Certificates 1881-1917 (on microfilm) Surname Given Name Year Roll Comment or Following on film Armstrong Madilene 1891 1 Armstrong Samuel E 1891 1 Armstrong Valerie D McFeely 1901 1 Arn Christ, dau of 1893 1 Arnberg Mons Edward 1894 1 Arnbricht Jacob 1897 1 Arndt Marie Magdelina Houn 1902 1 Arpi Arndt Rudolph 1891 1 Arnold Benjamin Franklin K 1900 1 Arnold Frank 1896 1 Arnold Henry J 1898 1 Arnold J B (Male) 1900 1 Arnold Jennie 1893 [2] 1 Arnold John C 1883 [2] 1 Arnold John Colvin 1896 1 Arnold Katy 1895 1 Arnold Lillie Permelia 1895 1 Arnold Mary 1900 [2] 1 Arnold Uriah K 1902 1 Amac Arnold Victor 1893 1 Arnspiger Bertha Luella 1900 1 Arpi Arnspiger George 1893 1 Aaa Arnspiger George Alexander 1893 1 Ahr Arnspiger Henry 1895 1 Arpi Aronson August, son of 1895
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fanny Eaton: the 'Other' Pre-Raphaelite Model' Pre ~ R2.Phadite -Related Books , and Hope That These Will Be of Interest to You and Inspire You to Further Reading
    which will continue. I know that many members are avid readers of Fanny Eaton: The 'Other' Pre-Raphaelite Model' Pre ~ R2.phadite -related books , and hope that these will be of interest to you and inspire you to further reading. If you are interested in writing reviews Robeno C. Ferrad for us, please get in touch with me or Ka.tja. This issue has bee n delayed due to personal circumstances,so I must offer speciaJ thanks to Sophie Clarke for her help in editing and p roo f~read in g izzie Siddall. Jane Morris. Annie Mine r. Maria Zamhaco. to en'able me to catch up! Anyone who has studied the Pre-Raphaelite paintings of Dante. G abriel RosS(:tti, William Holman Hunt, and Edward Serena Trrrwhridge I) - Burne~Jonc.s kno\VS well the names of these women. They were the stunners who populated their paintings, exuding sensual imagery and Advertisement personalized symbolism that generated for them and their collectors an introspeClive idea l of Victorian fem ininity. But these stunners also appear in art history today thanks to fe mi nism and gender snldies. Sensational . Avoncroft Museu m of Historic Buildings and scholnrly explorations of the lives and representations of these Avoncroft .. near Bromsgrove is an award-winning ~' women-written mostly by women, from Lucinda H awksley to G riselda Museum muS(: um that spans 700 years of life in the Pollock- have become more common in Pre·Raphaelite studies.2 Indeed, West Midlands. It is England's first open ~ air one arguably now needs to know more about the.
    [Show full text]
  • Japonisme in Britain - a Source of Inspiration: J
    Japonisme in Britain - A Source of Inspiration: J. McN. Whistler, Mortimer Menpes, George Henry, E.A. Hornel and nineteenth century Japan. Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History of Art, University of Glasgow. By Ayako Ono vol. 1. © Ayako Ono 2001 ProQuest Number: 13818783 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13818783 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1346 GLASGOW UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 122%'Cop7 I Abstract Japan held a profound fascination for Western artists in the latter half of the nineteenth century. The influence of Japanese art is a phenomenon that is now called Japonisme , and it spread widely throughout Western art. It is quite hard to make a clear definition of Japonisme because of the breadth of the phenomenon, but it could be generally agreed that it is an attempt to understand and adapt the essential qualities of Japanese art. This thesis explores Japanese influences on British Art and will focus on four artists working in Britain: the American James McNeill Whistler (1834-1903), the Australian Mortimer Menpes (1855-1938), and two artists from the group known as the Glasgow Boys, George Henry (1858-1934) and Edward Atkinson Hornel (1864-1933).
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    30 THE JOURNAL OF THE Fig. 1. Simeon Solomon: Sketch for illustration of the Swinburne novel Lesbla Brandon. (Box 31, Folder 20, Janet Gamp Troxell Collection of Rossetti Manuscripts. Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Libraries.) RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES 31 SWINBURNE AT PRINCETON BY MARGARET M. SHERRY Dr. Sherry is Reference Librarian and Archivist at Princeton University In the 1860s Swinburne was as engaged in writing fiction as in producing material for his first published volume of poetry, Poems and Ballads. The manuscript of his novel Lesbia Brandon, however, never went into print during his lifetime because Watts-Dunton disapproved of its incestuous subtext.1 The opening pages of the novel, which was published only posthumously by Randolph Hughes in 1952, give a detailed description of two pairs of eyes, those of brother and sister. Their resemblance to one another is so uncanny as to make both seem sexually ambiguous, if not entirely androgynous: "Either smiled with the same lips and looked straight with the same clear eyes."2 The frontispiece to this article, Figure 1, a sketch by the artist Simeon Solomon, gives us some idea of what the idealized beauty of the characters in this novel was to be. The second illustration, Figure 2, shows the younger brother Herbert, recovering from a flogging, sitting with his sister who has turned to look at him from where she sits at the piano. Herbert's teacher Denham, it is explained in the narrative, enjoys flogging his teenage pupil to punish Herbert's sister indirectly for being sexually inaccessible to him — she is already a married woman.
    [Show full text]
  • On Gender and the Division of Artistic and Domestic Labour in Nineteenth
    The Artist’s Household: On Gender and the Division of Artistic and Domestic Labour in Nineteenth-Century London Lara Perry Contemporary art and art histories are currently having a productive reckoning with the material demands of domestic work and parenting, considered as both a stimulus and constraint to art production. Resonating with the concept of ‘immaterial labour’ that has become prominent in explorations of the structures of contemporary art, feminist artists and critics have exposed the important gendered dimension of the immaterial and socialreproduction labour involved in the career of the contemporary artist. Art projects such as CASCO’s long-term programme (2009-) User’s Manual: The Grand Domestic Revolution and The Mother House project in London (2016) have picked up where Mierle Ukeles Laderman’s performance works of Maintenance Art in the 1960s and 1970s left off, and analysts have similarly refocused their efforts to include considerations of the gendered impact of parenthood on art production. For example, in her book Gender, ArtWork and the Global Imperative: A Materialist Feminist Critique (2013) Angela Dimitrakaki explored the impact of constant travel and around-the-clock schedule on women’s art careers; that this is more of an issue for mothers than for fathers was confirmed by a survey of Swedish artists made by Marita Flisbåck and Sofia Lindstrom (also published in 2013), which offered evidence that the careers of male artists benefit from a greater degree of freedom from the work of the household.1 All of this activity is associated with the investigation of contemporary rather than historical art practices.
    [Show full text]
  • “He Hath Mingled with the Ungodly”
    ―HE HATH MINGLED WITH THE UNGODLY‖: THE LIFE OF SIMEON SOLOMON AFTER 1873, WITH A SURVEY OF THE EXTANT WORKS CAROLYN CONROY TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I PH.D. THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART DECEMBER 2009 2 ABSTRACT This thesis focuses on the life and work of the marginalized British Pre-Raphaelite and Aesthetic homosexual Jewish painter Simeon Solomon (1840-1905) after 1873.This year was fundamental in the artist‘s professional and personal life, because it is the year that he was arrested for attempted sodomy charges in London. The popular view that has been disseminated by the early historiography of Solomon, since before and after his death in 1905, has been to claim that, after this date, the artist led a life that was worthless, both personally and artistically. It has also asserted that this situation was self-inflicted, and that, despite the consistent efforts of his family and friends to return him to the conventions of Victorian middle-class life, he resisted, and that, this resistant was evidence of his ‗deviancy‘. Indeed, for over sixty years, the overall effect of this early historiography has been to defame the character of Solomon and reduce his importance within the Aesthetic movement and the second wave of Pre-Raphaelitism. It has also had the effect of relegating the work that he produced after 1873 to either virtual obscurity or critical censure. In fact, it is only recently that a revival of interest in the artist has gained momentum, although the latter part of his life from 1873 has still remained under- researched and unrecorded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Looking-Glass World: Mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite Painting 1850-1915
    THE LOOKING-GLASS WORLD Mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite Painting, 1850-1915 TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I Claire Elizabeth Yearwood Ph.D. University of York History of Art October 2014 Abstract This dissertation examines the role of mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite painting as a significant motif that ultimately contributes to the on-going discussion surrounding the problematic PRB label. With varying stylistic objectives that often appear contradictory, as well as the disbandment of the original Brotherhood a few short years after it formed, defining ‘Pre-Raphaelite’ as a style remains an intriguing puzzle. In spite of recurring frequently in the works of the Pre-Raphaelites, particularly in those by Dante Gabriel Rossetti and William Holman Hunt, the mirror has not been thoroughly investigated before. Instead, the use of the mirror is typically mentioned briefly within the larger structure of analysis and most often referred to as a quotation of Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait (1434) or as a symbol of vanity without giving further thought to the connotations of the mirror as a distinguishing mark of the movement. I argue for an analysis of the mirror both within the context of iconographic exchange between the original leaders and their later associates and followers, and also that of nineteenth- century glass production. The Pre-Raphaelite use of the mirror establishes a complex iconography that effectively remytholgises an industrial object, conflates contradictory elements of past and present, spiritual and physical, and contributes to a specific artistic dialogue between the disparate strands of the movement that anchors the problematic PRB label within a context of iconographic exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Through Most of Art History Women Artists Have Been Largely Ignored
    SESSION 18 Women artists 1400 - 2000 (Monday 3rd February & Tuesday 7th January) 1. Sofonisba Anguissola 1.1. The Chess Game 1555 Oil on canvas, National Museum Warsaw (72 X 97 cm) 2. Barbara Longhi, 2.1. Madonna and Child 1580-85 Oil on canvas, Indianopolis Museum of Art (48 X29 cm) 3. Lavinia Fontana, 3.1. Minerva Dressing 1613 Borghese Gallery, Rome 4. Artemisia Gentileschi, 4.1. Self Portrait as the Allegory of Painting 1638 Oil on canvas, Royal Collection, London (96 X 74 cm) 5. Rachel Ruysch, 5.1. Roses, Convolvulus, Poppies, and Other Flowers in an Urn on a Stone Ledge 1688 Oil on canvas, National Museum of Women in the Arts, Washington 6. Judith Leyster, 6.1. The Proposition 1631 Oil on panel, Mauritshuis, The Hague (31 X 24 cm) 7. Angelica Kauffman 7.1. The Sorrow of Telemachus 1783 Oil on canvas, MMA New York (33 X 114 cm) [ and see The Conjurer 1775 by Nathaniel Hone] 8. Elizabeth Vigee-Lebrun 8.1. Self-Portrait with Her Daughter Julie 1789 Oil on canvas , Louvre, Paris (130 X 94cm) 9. Marie-Denise Villers, 9.1. Portrait of Charlotte du Val d'Ognes, 1801, oil on canvas MMA, New York 10. Emily Mary Osborn 10.1. Nameless and Friendless 1857 Tate Britain Oil on canvas (82 X 103 cm) 11. Rebecca Solomon 11.1. The Governess 1851 Oil on canvas, (66 X 86 cm) 12. Elizabeth Thompson (Lady Butler) 12.1. Scotland Forever 1881 Oil on canvas, Leeds Art Gallery 13. Rosa Bonheur 13.1. Ploughing in the Nivernais 1849 Oil on canvas, Musee D’Orsay (133 X 260 cm) 14.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL of DECADENCE STUDIES Issue 1 Spring 2018 Symons and Print Culture: Journalist, Critic, Book Maker Laur
    INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF DECADENCE STUDIES Issue 1 Spring 2018 Symons and Print Culture: Journalist, Critic, Book Maker Laurel Brake ISSN: 2515-0073 Date of Acceptance: 1 June 2018 Date of Publication: 21 June 2018 Citation: Laurel Brake, ‘Symons and Print Culture: Journalist, Critic, Book Maker’, Volupté: Interdisciplinary Journal of Decadence Studies, 1 (2018), 74-88. volupte.gold.ac.uk This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Symons and Print Culture: Journalist, Critic, Book Maker Laurel Brake Birkbeck, University of London My intent here is to explore the range and ingenuity of Arthur Symons’s participation in print culture, and to probe how he managed his bread and butter work as a journalist, critic, and book maker. My focus is his article ‘The Painting of the Nineteenth Century’, in its differing functions and forms over a four-year period (1903-1906), as a periodical book review and a chapter on painting that appeared in Studies in Seven Arts, a book comprised of articles from the press.1 What initially drew me to this article was its evidence of Symons’s sustained support for Simeon Solomon, a queer British artist from a London-based family of Jewish painters, in the decade that followed the Wilde trials, and among the inhibitions they fostered.2 Nearly a generation younger than Solomon, Symons (1865-1945) was born just as Solomon (1840-1905) began his career. Solomon appears in both the 1903 and 1906 versions of Symons’s review, and in between a newspaper review of an exhibition of Solomon’s work in 1905/1906.
    [Show full text]
  • SOURCES and BIBLIOGRAPHY Manuscript Sources: Angela
    355 SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Manuscript Sources: Angela Georgina Burdett Coutts. Last Will and Testament dated 8 August 1888. William Lehman Ashmead Bartlett Burdett Coutts Last Will and Testament dated 21 March 1907. John Henry Darbishire. Last Will and Testament dated 6 June 1896. Christie’s Auction Catalogue 4 May 1922 Sale of Burdett Coutts Collection. Phillips Auction Catalogue: Burdett Coutts. Furniture and Watercolour Sale, Undated 1922. British Library: Burdett Coutts Papers BL 46402,46404, 46405, 46405A, 46405B,46406, 6406A,46406B,46407and Additional Paper BL63097. Carnarvon Papers Additional Paper 60867A. Gladstone Papers BL44404, BL44437 Graves Papers BL 46140 Brodie Papers. Papers of William Brodie. National Library of Scotland. Church Buildings Council (formerly Council for the Care of Churches), London: File on St Stephen’s Church, Westminster. Report for the Council for Places of Worship: St James, Moore Park Road, London. CON. Charles Osborne’s Notes on the Art Collection of the Baroness Angela Burdett Coutts, in the possession of the Hon. William Burdett Coutts. Coutts Archive, Nos.2363, 2270, 2271. Coutts Bank, London. Edinburgh City Library: Edinburgh Town Council Minute Books, Harrowby MSS. Sandon Hall, Staffordshire.Third Series 1838-1854; Fourth Series: 1836- 1840, 1841-45, 1855-56, 1861-64, 1864-1868; Heinz Archive, National Portrait Gallery, London. Lambeth Palace Library, London: Lambeth Burdett Coutts Papers. London Metropolitan Archives, Information Leaflet No 22, 1997, George Godwin and ‘The Builder. London Borough of Camden Local History Library and Archive, Holborn: Heal Archive. 356 National Art Library, Victoria and Albert Museum. MSL/1903/9000/254; 86.ww1 1849. N.P.G. Minute Book 1922,National Portrait Gallery, London Paul Mellon Centre, London: Schiff, Gert.
    [Show full text]
  • Stunning Sisters
    This is a repository copy of Stunning Sisters. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/166812/ Version: Published Version Article: Prettejohn, Liz orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-0448 (2020) Stunning Sisters. Aspectus. pp. 2-6. ISSN 2732-561X 10.15124/t98e-1m40 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ ASPECTUS A Journal of Visual Culture PROFESSOR ELIZABETH PRETTEJOHN, DR MADDIE BODEN, DR MELISSA L. GUSTIN, CAITLIN DOLEY, MARTE STINIS Pre-Raphaelite Sisters: In Conversation Issue 2 - 2020 ISSN 2732-561X pp. 1-18 DOI: 10.15124/t98e-1m40 University of York Published: 14 October 2020 0 In Conversation; Pre-Raphaelite Sisters INTRODUCTION SUSIE BECKHAM, EDITOR On 12-13 December 2019, the University of York hosted the Pre-Raphaelite Sisters: Making Art conference, held in conjunction with the National Portrait Gallery’s exhibition Pre-Raphaelite Sisters that ran from 17 October 2019 to 26 January 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available
    UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Alfred Elmore: life, work and context Author(s) de Bhailís, Caoimhín Publication date 2017 Original citation De Bhailis, P. C. 2017. Alfred Elmore: life, work and context. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2017, Padraig Caoimhin De Bhailis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/5433 from Downloaded on 2021-10-06T16:37:37Z Alfred Elmore: Life, Work and Context Pádraig Caoimhín de Bhailís A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College Cork November 2017 Volume 1 of 2 (Text) Supervisor: Professor Brendan Dooley College of Arts, Celtic Studies and Social Sciences Head of Department: Dr. Alan Gibbs 1 Contents Acknowledgements 3 Abstract 4 List of Illustrations 5 Introduction 15 Chapter 1 Elmore‘s Clonakilty 28 Chapter 2 Influence and Influences in the Work of Elmore 35 Chapter 3 The Religious Controversy 95 Chapter 4 Temporality and Narrative Absence in Elmore‘s Paintings 144 Chapter 5 Elmore‘s Drawings and Watercolours: An Artist Unatrophied 190 Conclusion 207 Bibliography 213 List of Image Sources 240 This is to certify that the work I am submitting is my own and has not been submitted for another degree, either at University College Cork or elsewhere. All external references and sources are clearly acknowledged and identified within the contents. I have read and understood the regulations of University College Cork concerning plagiarism. 2 Acknowledgements I‘d like to thank to Department of History of Art, University College Cork for setting me on this journey and Professor Brendan Dooley for his supervision that saw me through to its completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Simeon Solomon's Work Before 1873
    SIMEON SOLOMON’S WORK BEFORE 1873: INTERPRETATION AND IDENTITY BY AILEEN ELIZABETH NAYLOR A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History of Art School of Languages, Cultures, Art History and Music The University of Birmingham September 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis has two aims. The first is to demonstrate that commentaries on the work produced by Simeon Solomon (1840-1905) before 1873, an artist who was Jewish and homosexual, have been dominated by critics’ perceptions of him as a marginal figure. Solomon’s Jewish heritage and homosexuality doubly marginalised him in the Christian, heterosexual culture of Victorian England so it is understandable that commentators have focused on his minority position and read signs of difference in his works. However, my second aim is to challenge this perspective. I will show how much Solomon’s art had in common with that of his contemporaries and broaden the discussion by analysing paintings which have been given less critical attention, possibly because they do not present so many opportunities to refer to the artist’s marginality.
    [Show full text]