DOCSLIB.ORG

End of Campaign Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
End of Campaign Report UNIVERSITY OF V IRGINIA LAW S CHOO L C AMPAIGN REPORTAMPAIGN 2004–2012 Law Campaign Cover 2013.indd 1 5/17/13 2:37 PM THE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN for THE AMERICAN IDEAL IN LEGAL EDUCATION 2004–2012 THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW CONTENTS From the Chairs 5 From the Deans 6 Capital Campaign Executive Committee 9 Leadership Gifts 10 Legacy Gifts 16 Estate Gifts 18 Campaign Donors by Class 20 Class Participation 86 Friends 89 Firms, Foundations, & Corporations 102 Law School Foundation Board of Trustees 110 Law School Foundation Staff 111 DAVID L. MULLiken ’75 and EDWARD J. “NED” KELLY III ’81 Capital Campaign Co-Chairs 4 FROM THE CHAIRS HE CAMPAIGN FOR THE AMERICAN IDEAL IN LEGAL EDUCATION began as a claim about the birthright and promise of the Law School. Eight years later, the Tculture that for so long was unique to our community has become the object of emulation by our peers. There is a special blend of intelligence, character, and courtesy that defines our graduates. Our students possess those qualities and refine them in and out of the classroom. They learn citizenship and leadership, and they honor the Law School when they carry those virtues with them into the world. They are the best of Virginia, and this campaign invested in them. Your support exceeded every expectation. There are, literally, thousands of donors to thank. Their names are listed in the following pages and represent every constituency: alumni, faculty, friends, parents, firms, corporations, foundations. This was a shared effort that preserved the Law School we cherish and made it even better. It was our privilege to serve with the Campaign Executive Committee, whose members endorsed our highest aspirations. They staked the launch of the campaign and pushed it beyond goal. The Law School Foundation’s board of trustees was exemplary. They participated fully at every opportunity and provided inspiration and confidence throughout. The deans, John Jeffries ’73 and Paul Mahoney, carried our message from beginning to end. They were champions of the Law School we remember and the remarkable institution we celebrate today. Above all, we wish to recognize you, whose belief in the Law School made so much good possible in this campaign. Your commitment to the student experience was constant. It is and remains the heart of the Law School, and we are grateful to you for helping sustain it. David L. Mulliken ’75 Edward J. “Ned” Kelly III ’81 5 FROM THE DEANS E ARE DELIGHTED TO PROVIDE THIS REPORT HONORING THE 16,262 donors who committed a total of $173.9 million to the 2004–2012 capital Wcampaign. The campaign began shortly after the Law School entered into financial self-sufficiency with the University. That arrangement and your support will help ensure the Law School’s continued competitiveness with the nation’s finest public and private law schools. When the capital campaign began, none of us could have foreseen the enormous challenges that would be posed by the Great Recession and its aftermath. But we could easily have predicted our community’s response to those challenges. In tough economic times, you made the Law School a priority and not only met, but surpassed, the $150 million campaign goal. The results of the Law School’s first capital campaign (1993–2000) are visible all around us in the Harrison Law Grounds, one of the nation’s most beautiful and functional places to learn and teach. But the results of the just-completed campaign, appropriately themed The American Ideal in Legal Education, are equally important and will be equally durable. In this campaign, we invested in our most important assets—our students and faculty. The campaign added greatly to the resources available for scholarships, fellowships, and public service loan forgiveness. It also endowed chairs and other sources of faculty support that will help us attract and retain worthy successors to Hardy Dillard, Emerson Spies, Tom Bergin, Lillian BeVier, and other giants of our past. And we transformed a drab office corridor in the former Darden School (now Slaughter Hall) into the stunning Karsh Student Services Center, a further contribution to our unmatched student experience. David Mulliken ’75 and Ned Kelly ’81, the campaign co-chairs, and the rest of the Campaign Executive Committee led from the front throughout. They gave freely not only of their financial resources but also of their time. Their efforts multiplied those of the Law School Foundation staff and the dean. Like its predecessor, this campaign reflected the Law School’s tradition of inclusion and participation. An astonishing 72% of living alumni made gifts. Participation was even higher among our youngest alumni, whose memories of the Law School are freshest. Over 89% of alumni who graduated 6 PAUL G. MAHONEY John C. Jeffries, Jr. ’73 Dean Dean, 2001–2008 between 2002 and 2012 gave to the campaign. We are particularly proud of the fact that the Law School’s faculty donated 5.9% of the total raised. Their devotion to their students does not end when the day’s classes are over. We can never repay your generosity to the Law School or the friendship you have shown us personally. We are truly grateful beyond words. Ours is a law school defined by a sense of community and shared purpose. Your support is essential to maintaining the quality of faculty and students that make it so. We hope you take as much pride as we do in the extraordinary success of your Law School’s capital campaign. Paul G. Mahoney John C. Jeffries, Jr. ’73 7 8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Executive Committee advised the Dean and the Foundation on the conduct of the Campaign for the American Ideal in Legal Education. The chairs and members publicly endorsed the effort and ensured its success. We are the better for their leadership and service. CHAIRS David L. Mulliken ’75 Edward J. Kelly III ’81 Steven D. Brooks ’79 Byron F. Marchant ’87 Nicholas E. Chimicles ’73 Brian M. ’74 and Paula H. Powers Douglas D. Drysdale ’53 Thomas F. ’53 (d) and Helen G. Shannon William B. Fryer ’74 Richard D. ’63 (d) and Gail S. Siegal John W. Glynn, Jr. ’65 James C. ’51 (d) and Lee S. Slaughter Bradley A. ’95 and Emeri S. Handler William M. Slaughter ’66 Michael J. Horvitz ’75 Thatcher A. Stone ’82 John C. Jeffries, Jr. ’73 John R. Turbyfill ’56 Barbara S. Jeremiah ’77 Michael ’63 and Barbara Weintraub Bruce A. Karsh ’80 Samuel B. Witt, III ’64 Martha Lubin Karsh ’81 Stephen ’72 and Martha Anne Yandle Roger H. Kimmel ’71 Robert G. Zack ’75 Paul G. Mahoney, Dean (d) deceased 9 LEADERSHIP GIFTS $5 million and above John Gregory Odom ’78 The Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation John M. Olin Foundation H. Brice Graves ’38, Estate Ann C. Peyton (d) Bruce A. Karsh ’80 Blaine T. Phillips ’55 Martha Lubin Karsh ’81 Brian M. ’74 and Paula H. Powers James C. ’51 (d) and Lee S. Slaughter Anne Russell Gwyn Robertson (d, w ’48) Anonymous Thomas F. ’53 (d) and Helen G. Shannon Richard D. ’63 (d) and Gail S. Siegal $2 million to $4,999,999 William M. Slaughter ’66 Thatcher A. Stone ’82 John W. Glynn, Jr. ’65 John R. Turbyfill ’56 Michael J. ’75 and Jane R. Horvitz Stephen ’72 and Martha Anne Yandle Edward J. Kelly III ’81 Anonymous Marjorie Matheson (w ’50) David L. ’75 and Noreen G. Mulliken Sarah Scaife Foundation $500,000 to $999,999 Fred Seliger ’52, Estate E. Fontaine Broun ’32, Estate Michael ’63 and Barbara Weintraub Mortimer Caplin ’40 Robert G. Zack ’75 Cameron L. Cowan ’81 and Patricia J. Cowan Norwood H. Davis, Jr. ’66 $1 million to $1,999,999 Thomas R. Denison ’86 Patricia Foster Ekin (w ’32), Estate Bob Barker Alan S. Gaynor ’52, Estate Steven D. Brooks ’79 Mary Hayes-Hutton (w ’47), Estate Nicholas E. Chimicles ’73 Barbara S. Jeremiah ’77 Douglas D. Drysdale ’53 and Elaine M. Hadden John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation William B. ’74 and Sade D. Fryer Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Raymond J. and Kathryn D. Harbert Tim R. Palmer ’83 John C. Jeffries, Jr. ’73 Smith Richardson Foundation Louis A. Johnson 1912, Estate Charles Henry Smith ’74 Roger H. Kimmel ’71 Ronald Paul Stenlake ’66, Estate Frank D. Kittredge, Jr. (arch ’78) Samuel B. Witt, III ’64 Bernard Lubschutz, Estate The Madison Lane and Rugby Road Charitable Trust Allen F. Maulsby ’46, Estate Mt. Cuba Center 10 $250,000 to $499,999 James A. Rogers ’63 and Patricia F. Rissler Sewell C. Biggs ’42, Estate Philip T. Ruegger III ’74 David C. ’93 and Kelly L. Burke Mikael Salovaara ’79 Stephen A. Cardi ’66 The Searle Freedom Trust The Carthage Foundation Leland C. Selby ’69 G. Moffett Cochran ’76 William A. Staley, Estate Carl H. Cofer, Jr. ’63 Barry E. Taylor ’75 and Elizabeth Tyree-Taylor Wallace L. Cook ’64 John Van Deventer ’82 Edmonson S. Couric, Jr. ’60 (d) Virginia Law Review Association CSX Corporation Douglas A. III and Patricia Warner (p ’09) The Charles A. Dana Foundation Clark M. Whittemore, Jr. ’49 (d) George W. Devoe ’52, Estate Richard L. Williams ’51, Estate William K. Diehl, Jr. ’69 Bob ’68 and Suzanne Wright The Richard Davoud Donchian Foundation Anonymous Frederick S. Downs, Jr. ’86 David W. Draper, Jr. ’91 $100,000 to $249,999 Jessie Ball duPont Fund Kevin G. Abrams ’84 ExxonMobil Foundation John H., Jr. ’67 (d) and Leslie S. Ariail Charles D. Fox III ’57 James K. Asselstine ’73 Charles A. Gilman ’74 David Baldacci ’86 J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fanny Eaton: the 'Other' Pre-Raphaelite Model' Pre ~ R2.Phadite -Related Books , and Hope That These Will Be of Interest to You and Inspire You to Further Reading
    which will continue. I know that many members are avid readers of Fanny Eaton: The 'Other' Pre-Raphaelite Model' Pre ~ R2.phadite -related books , and hope that these will be of interest to you and inspire you to further reading. If you are interested in writing reviews Robeno C. Ferrad for us, please get in touch with me or Ka.tja. This issue has bee n delayed due to personal circumstances,so I must offer speciaJ thanks to Sophie Clarke for her help in editing and p roo f~read in g izzie Siddall. Jane Morris. Annie Mine r. Maria Zamhaco. to en'able me to catch up! Anyone who has studied the Pre-Raphaelite paintings of Dante. G abriel RosS(:tti, William Holman Hunt, and Edward Serena Trrrwhridge I) - Burne~Jonc.s kno\VS well the names of these women. They were the stunners who populated their paintings, exuding sensual imagery and Advertisement personalized symbolism that generated for them and their collectors an introspeClive idea l of Victorian fem ininity. But these stunners also appear in art history today thanks to fe mi nism and gender snldies. Sensational . Avoncroft Museu m of Historic Buildings and scholnrly explorations of the lives and representations of these Avoncroft .. near Bromsgrove is an award-winning ~' women-written mostly by women, from Lucinda H awksley to G riselda Museum muS(: um that spans 700 years of life in the Pollock- have become more common in Pre·Raphaelite studies.2 Indeed, West Midlands. It is England's first open ~ air one arguably now needs to know more about the.
    [Show full text]
  • Japonisme in Britain - a Source of Inspiration: J
    Japonisme in Britain - A Source of Inspiration: J. McN. Whistler, Mortimer Menpes, George Henry, E.A. Hornel and nineteenth century Japan. Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History of Art, University of Glasgow. By Ayako Ono vol. 1. © Ayako Ono 2001 ProQuest Number: 13818783 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13818783 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1346 GLASGOW UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 122%'Cop7 I Abstract Japan held a profound fascination for Western artists in the latter half of the nineteenth century. The influence of Japanese art is a phenomenon that is now called Japonisme , and it spread widely throughout Western art. It is quite hard to make a clear definition of Japonisme because of the breadth of the phenomenon, but it could be generally agreed that it is an attempt to understand and adapt the essential qualities of Japanese art. This thesis explores Japanese influences on British Art and will focus on four artists working in Britain: the American James McNeill Whistler (1834-1903), the Australian Mortimer Menpes (1855-1938), and two artists from the group known as the Glasgow Boys, George Henry (1858-1934) and Edward Atkinson Hornel (1864-1933).
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Study of the Ideologies of Judges on the Unites States
    JUDGED BY THE COMPANY YOU KEEP: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE IDEOLOGIES OF JUDGES ON THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS Corey Rayburn Yung* Abstract: Although there has been an explosion of empirical legal schol- arship about the federal judiciary, with a particular focus on judicial ide- ology, the question remains: how do we know what the ideology of a judge actually is? For federal courts below the U.S. Supreme Court, legal aca- demics and political scientists have offered only crude proxies to identify the ideologies of judges. This Article attempts to cure this deficiency in empirical research about the federal courts by introducing a new tech- nique for measuring the ideology of judges based upon judicial behavior in the U.S. courts of appeals. This study measures ideology, not by subjec- tively coding the ideological direction of case outcomes, but by determin- ing the degree to which federal appellate judges agree and disagree with their liberal and conservative colleagues at both the appellate and district court levels. Further, through regression analysis, several important find- ings related to the Ideology Scores emerge. First, the Ideology Scores in this Article offer substantial improvements in predicting civil rights case outcomes over the leading measures of ideology. Second, there were very different levels and heterogeneity of ideology among the judges on the studied circuits. Third, the data did not support the conventional wisdom that Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush appointed uniquely ideological judges. Fourth, in general judges appointed by Republican presidents were more ideological than those appointed by Democratic presidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    30 THE JOURNAL OF THE Fig. 1. Simeon Solomon: Sketch for illustration of the Swinburne novel Lesbla Brandon. (Box 31, Folder 20, Janet Gamp Troxell Collection of Rossetti Manuscripts. Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Libraries.) RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES 31 SWINBURNE AT PRINCETON BY MARGARET M. SHERRY Dr. Sherry is Reference Librarian and Archivist at Princeton University In the 1860s Swinburne was as engaged in writing fiction as in producing material for his first published volume of poetry, Poems and Ballads. The manuscript of his novel Lesbia Brandon, however, never went into print during his lifetime because Watts-Dunton disapproved of its incestuous subtext.1 The opening pages of the novel, which was published only posthumously by Randolph Hughes in 1952, give a detailed description of two pairs of eyes, those of brother and sister. Their resemblance to one another is so uncanny as to make both seem sexually ambiguous, if not entirely androgynous: "Either smiled with the same lips and looked straight with the same clear eyes."2 The frontispiece to this article, Figure 1, a sketch by the artist Simeon Solomon, gives us some idea of what the idealized beauty of the characters in this novel was to be. The second illustration, Figure 2, shows the younger brother Herbert, recovering from a flogging, sitting with his sister who has turned to look at him from where she sits at the piano. Herbert's teacher Denham, it is explained in the narrative, enjoys flogging his teenage pupil to punish Herbert's sister indirectly for being sexually inaccessible to him — she is already a married woman.
    [Show full text]
  • On Gender and the Division of Artistic and Domestic Labour in Nineteenth
    The Artist’s Household: On Gender and the Division of Artistic and Domestic Labour in Nineteenth-Century London Lara Perry Contemporary art and art histories are currently having a productive reckoning with the material demands of domestic work and parenting, considered as both a stimulus and constraint to art production. Resonating with the concept of ‘immaterial labour’ that has become prominent in explorations of the structures of contemporary art, feminist artists and critics have exposed the important gendered dimension of the immaterial and socialreproduction labour involved in the career of the contemporary artist. Art projects such as CASCO’s long-term programme (2009-) User’s Manual: The Grand Domestic Revolution and The Mother House project in London (2016) have picked up where Mierle Ukeles Laderman’s performance works of Maintenance Art in the 1960s and 1970s left off, and analysts have similarly refocused their efforts to include considerations of the gendered impact of parenthood on art production. For example, in her book Gender, ArtWork and the Global Imperative: A Materialist Feminist Critique (2013) Angela Dimitrakaki explored the impact of constant travel and around-the-clock schedule on women’s art careers; that this is more of an issue for mothers than for fathers was confirmed by a survey of Swedish artists made by Marita Flisbåck and Sofia Lindstrom (also published in 2013), which offered evidence that the careers of male artists benefit from a greater degree of freedom from the work of the household.1 All of this activity is associated with the investigation of contemporary rather than historical art practices.
    [Show full text]
  • “He Hath Mingled with the Ungodly”
    ―HE HATH MINGLED WITH THE UNGODLY‖: THE LIFE OF SIMEON SOLOMON AFTER 1873, WITH A SURVEY OF THE EXTANT WORKS CAROLYN CONROY TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I PH.D. THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART DECEMBER 2009 2 ABSTRACT This thesis focuses on the life and work of the marginalized British Pre-Raphaelite and Aesthetic homosexual Jewish painter Simeon Solomon (1840-1905) after 1873.This year was fundamental in the artist‘s professional and personal life, because it is the year that he was arrested for attempted sodomy charges in London. The popular view that has been disseminated by the early historiography of Solomon, since before and after his death in 1905, has been to claim that, after this date, the artist led a life that was worthless, both personally and artistically. It has also asserted that this situation was self-inflicted, and that, despite the consistent efforts of his family and friends to return him to the conventions of Victorian middle-class life, he resisted, and that, this resistant was evidence of his ‗deviancy‘. Indeed, for over sixty years, the overall effect of this early historiography has been to defame the character of Solomon and reduce his importance within the Aesthetic movement and the second wave of Pre-Raphaelitism. It has also had the effect of relegating the work that he produced after 1873 to either virtual obscurity or critical censure. In fact, it is only recently that a revival of interest in the artist has gained momentum, although the latter part of his life from 1873 has still remained under- researched and unrecorded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Looking-Glass World: Mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite Painting 1850-1915
    THE LOOKING-GLASS WORLD Mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite Painting, 1850-1915 TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I Claire Elizabeth Yearwood Ph.D. University of York History of Art October 2014 Abstract This dissertation examines the role of mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite painting as a significant motif that ultimately contributes to the on-going discussion surrounding the problematic PRB label. With varying stylistic objectives that often appear contradictory, as well as the disbandment of the original Brotherhood a few short years after it formed, defining ‘Pre-Raphaelite’ as a style remains an intriguing puzzle. In spite of recurring frequently in the works of the Pre-Raphaelites, particularly in those by Dante Gabriel Rossetti and William Holman Hunt, the mirror has not been thoroughly investigated before. Instead, the use of the mirror is typically mentioned briefly within the larger structure of analysis and most often referred to as a quotation of Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait (1434) or as a symbol of vanity without giving further thought to the connotations of the mirror as a distinguishing mark of the movement. I argue for an analysis of the mirror both within the context of iconographic exchange between the original leaders and their later associates and followers, and also that of nineteenth- century glass production. The Pre-Raphaelite use of the mirror establishes a complex iconography that effectively remytholgises an industrial object, conflates contradictory elements of past and present, spiritual and physical, and contributes to a specific artistic dialogue between the disparate strands of the movement that anchors the problematic PRB label within a context of iconographic exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Through Most of Art History Women Artists Have Been Largely Ignored
    SESSION 18 Women artists 1400 - 2000 (Monday 3rd February & Tuesday 7th January) 1. Sofonisba Anguissola 1.1. The Chess Game 1555 Oil on canvas, National Museum Warsaw (72 X 97 cm) 2. Barbara Longhi, 2.1. Madonna and Child 1580-85 Oil on canvas, Indianopolis Museum of Art (48 X29 cm) 3. Lavinia Fontana, 3.1. Minerva Dressing 1613 Borghese Gallery, Rome 4. Artemisia Gentileschi, 4.1. Self Portrait as the Allegory of Painting 1638 Oil on canvas, Royal Collection, London (96 X 74 cm) 5. Rachel Ruysch, 5.1. Roses, Convolvulus, Poppies, and Other Flowers in an Urn on a Stone Ledge 1688 Oil on canvas, National Museum of Women in the Arts, Washington 6. Judith Leyster, 6.1. The Proposition 1631 Oil on panel, Mauritshuis, The Hague (31 X 24 cm) 7. Angelica Kauffman 7.1. The Sorrow of Telemachus 1783 Oil on canvas, MMA New York (33 X 114 cm) [ and see The Conjurer 1775 by Nathaniel Hone] 8. Elizabeth Vigee-Lebrun 8.1. Self-Portrait with Her Daughter Julie 1789 Oil on canvas , Louvre, Paris (130 X 94cm) 9. Marie-Denise Villers, 9.1. Portrait of Charlotte du Val d'Ognes, 1801, oil on canvas MMA, New York 10. Emily Mary Osborn 10.1. Nameless and Friendless 1857 Tate Britain Oil on canvas (82 X 103 cm) 11. Rebecca Solomon 11.1. The Governess 1851 Oil on canvas, (66 X 86 cm) 12. Elizabeth Thompson (Lady Butler) 12.1. Scotland Forever 1881 Oil on canvas, Leeds Art Gallery 13. Rosa Bonheur 13.1. Ploughing in the Nivernais 1849 Oil on canvas, Musee D’Orsay (133 X 260 cm) 14.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL of DECADENCE STUDIES Issue 1 Spring 2018 Symons and Print Culture: Journalist, Critic, Book Maker Laur
    INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF DECADENCE STUDIES Issue 1 Spring 2018 Symons and Print Culture: Journalist, Critic, Book Maker Laurel Brake ISSN: 2515-0073 Date of Acceptance: 1 June 2018 Date of Publication: 21 June 2018 Citation: Laurel Brake, ‘Symons and Print Culture: Journalist, Critic, Book Maker’, Volupté: Interdisciplinary Journal of Decadence Studies, 1 (2018), 74-88. volupte.gold.ac.uk This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Symons and Print Culture: Journalist, Critic, Book Maker Laurel Brake Birkbeck, University of London My intent here is to explore the range and ingenuity of Arthur Symons’s participation in print culture, and to probe how he managed his bread and butter work as a journalist, critic, and book maker. My focus is his article ‘The Painting of the Nineteenth Century’, in its differing functions and forms over a four-year period (1903-1906), as a periodical book review and a chapter on painting that appeared in Studies in Seven Arts, a book comprised of articles from the press.1 What initially drew me to this article was its evidence of Symons’s sustained support for Simeon Solomon, a queer British artist from a London-based family of Jewish painters, in the decade that followed the Wilde trials, and among the inhibitions they fostered.2 Nearly a generation younger than Solomon, Symons (1865-1945) was born just as Solomon (1840-1905) began his career. Solomon appears in both the 1903 and 1906 versions of Symons’s review, and in between a newspaper review of an exhibition of Solomon’s work in 1905/1906.
    [Show full text]
  • SOURCES and BIBLIOGRAPHY Manuscript Sources: Angela
    355 SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Manuscript Sources: Angela Georgina Burdett Coutts. Last Will and Testament dated 8 August 1888. William Lehman Ashmead Bartlett Burdett Coutts Last Will and Testament dated 21 March 1907. John Henry Darbishire. Last Will and Testament dated 6 June 1896. Christie’s Auction Catalogue 4 May 1922 Sale of Burdett Coutts Collection. Phillips Auction Catalogue: Burdett Coutts. Furniture and Watercolour Sale, Undated 1922. British Library: Burdett Coutts Papers BL 46402,46404, 46405, 46405A, 46405B,46406, 6406A,46406B,46407and Additional Paper BL63097. Carnarvon Papers Additional Paper 60867A. Gladstone Papers BL44404, BL44437 Graves Papers BL 46140 Brodie Papers. Papers of William Brodie. National Library of Scotland. Church Buildings Council (formerly Council for the Care of Churches), London: File on St Stephen’s Church, Westminster. Report for the Council for Places of Worship: St James, Moore Park Road, London. CON. Charles Osborne’s Notes on the Art Collection of the Baroness Angela Burdett Coutts, in the possession of the Hon. William Burdett Coutts. Coutts Archive, Nos.2363, 2270, 2271. Coutts Bank, London. Edinburgh City Library: Edinburgh Town Council Minute Books, Harrowby MSS. Sandon Hall, Staffordshire.Third Series 1838-1854; Fourth Series: 1836- 1840, 1841-45, 1855-56, 1861-64, 1864-1868; Heinz Archive, National Portrait Gallery, London. Lambeth Palace Library, London: Lambeth Burdett Coutts Papers. London Metropolitan Archives, Information Leaflet No 22, 1997, George Godwin and ‘The Builder. London Borough of Camden Local History Library and Archive, Holborn: Heal Archive. 356 National Art Library, Victoria and Albert Museum. MSL/1903/9000/254; 86.ww1 1849. N.P.G. Minute Book 1922,National Portrait Gallery, London Paul Mellon Centre, London: Schiff, Gert.
    [Show full text]
  • Stunning Sisters
    This is a repository copy of Stunning Sisters. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/166812/ Version: Published Version Article: Prettejohn, Liz orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-0448 (2020) Stunning Sisters. Aspectus. pp. 2-6. ISSN 2732-561X 10.15124/t98e-1m40 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ ASPECTUS A Journal of Visual Culture PROFESSOR ELIZABETH PRETTEJOHN, DR MADDIE BODEN, DR MELISSA L. GUSTIN, CAITLIN DOLEY, MARTE STINIS Pre-Raphaelite Sisters: In Conversation Issue 2 - 2020 ISSN 2732-561X pp. 1-18 DOI: 10.15124/t98e-1m40 University of York Published: 14 October 2020 0 In Conversation; Pre-Raphaelite Sisters INTRODUCTION SUSIE BECKHAM, EDITOR On 12-13 December 2019, the University of York hosted the Pre-Raphaelite Sisters: Making Art conference, held in conjunction with the National Portrait Gallery’s exhibition Pre-Raphaelite Sisters that ran from 17 October 2019 to 26 January 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Courts of the United States
    66 U.S. GOVERNMENT MANUAL of Decisions, the Librarian, the Marshal, Court Term The term of the Court the Director of Budget and Personnel, begins on the first Monday in October the Court Counsel, the Curator, the and lasts until the first Monday in Director of Data Systems, and the Public October of the next year. Approximately Information Officer. 8,000 cases are filed with the Court in Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate the course of a term, and some 1,000 jurisdiction has been conferred upon the applications of various kinds are filed Supreme Court by various statutes under each year that can be acted upon by a the authority given Congress by the single Justice. Constitution. The basic statute effective at this time in conferring and controlling Access to Facilities The Supreme Court jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4:30 be found in 28 U.S.C. 1251, 1253, p.m., Monday through Friday, except on 1254, 1257–1259, and various special Federal holidays. Unless the Court or statutes. Congress has no authority to Chief Justice orders otherwise, the change the original jurisdiction of this Clerk’s office is open from 9 a.m. to 5 Court. p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Rulemaking Power Congress has from Federal legal holidays. The library is time to time conferred upon the open to members of the bar of the Court, Supreme Court power to prescribe rules attorneys for the various Federal of procedure to be followed by the departments and agencies, and Members lower courts of the United States.
    [Show full text]