DOCSLIB.ORG

Burger-Blackmun Relationship: Lessons for Collegiality from the Blackmun Papers, The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Missouri Law Review Volume 70 Issue 4 Fall 2005 Article 4 Fall 2005 Burger-Blackmun Relationship: Lessons for Collegiality from the Blackmun Papers, The Duane Benton Barrett J. Vahle Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Duane Benton and Barrett J. Vahle, Burger-Blackmun Relationship: Lessons for Collegiality from the Blackmun Papers, The, 70 MO. L. REV. (2005) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol70/iss4/4 This Conference is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Benton and Vahle: Benton: Burger-Blackmun Relationship: The Burger-Blackmun Relationship: Lessons for Collegiality from the Blackmun Papers Duane Benton 2 Barrett J. Vahle On March 4, 2004, the Harry A. Blackmun Papers became available to the public at the Library of Congress.3 The Papers shed new light on Justice Blackmun's relationship with Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, providing a case study in collegiality. Before Blackmun's confirmation, an article in Time magazine stated, "No one seems to feel that Blackmun would be subservient to his lifelong friend, Chief Justice Warren Burger.' 4 The Senate appeared to agree, seemingly satis- fied with Blackmun's response to Senator Edward M. Kennedy's direct ques- tion about his relationship with Chief Justice Burger.5 The Associated Press, 6 New York Times, and Wall Street Journalwere, however, less sanguine. 1. Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. 2. Member, Missouri Bar; Law Clerk to Chief Judge Dean Whipple, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri; Law Clerk to Circuit Judge Duane Benton, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2004-05. 3. All citations to box and folder numbers throughout this article refer to the Harry A. Blackmun Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Throughout this article, in primary material, Harry A. Blackmun is abbreviated "HAB"; Warren E. Burger is "WEB." 4. Judge Harry Blackmun: A Craftsmanfor the Court, TIME, Apr. 27, 1970, at 20, 21. 5. See infra Appendix A. 6. See LINDA GREENHOUSE, BECOMING JUSTICE BLACKMUN: HARRY BLACKMUN'S SUPREME COURT JOURNEY 50 (2005) ("While the Associated Press, in a wire story carried by hundreds of newspapers, stressed Blackmun's 'striking similar- ity in view to his old friend, Chief Justice Warren E. Burger,' the Washington Post had a different emphasis. 'His opinions and reputation indicate that he is a conserva- tive with an independent mind and sensitivity to new ideas,' the Post article said."); Fred P. Graham, Burger and Blackmun: Opinions Similar, N.Y. TIMES, Apr. 15, 1970, at 34 (Box 1361, folder 7) ("Judge Blackmun appears strikingly like Mr. Burger in judicial philosophy."); Minnesota Friendof ChiefJustice Burger Termed Leading Candidatefor High Court, WALL ST. J., Apr. 13, 1970, at 5 (Box 1361, folder 7) ("Judge Blackmun is said to be the leading choice mainly because of his close rela- tionship with Chief Justice Burger."). Blackmun's files contain Nina Totenberg's story that he "worries that his close friendship with Chief Justice Warren E. Burger might be misconstrued." Nina Totenberg, Judge Worries About Ties To ChiefJustice: Nixon Nominee Blackmun Is Old Burger Friend; President Is Reasurring, NAT'L OBSERVER, Apr. 1970 (Box 1361, folder 14). Published by University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository, 2005 1 Missouri Law Review, Vol. 70, Iss. 4 [2005], Art. 4 MISSOURI LAW REVIEW [Vol. 70 The conventional wisdom is now clear: the two men were life-long friends until, as colleagues on the Supreme Court, differing ideologies and Burger's ego drove them apart. Woodward and Armstrong wrote in The Brethren: When he first arrived, Blackmun warned Burger that they would be tagged the "Minnesota Twins"...... It took only half a year of vot- ing together before Blackmun's prophecy came true. He was only surprised it had taken so long. Still, it particularly offended him, because it was clear that the Chief was the dominant twin. The notion implied that Blackmun had no judicial mind of his own .... The clerk network had another name for Blackmun: "Hip pocket Harry." Burger, they felt, con- trolled not only his own vote but Blackmun's as well.7 The relationship certainly changed from "hip pocket Harry." In 1974, when Blackmun showed the Chief Justice his revised statement of facts to Burger's original draft in United States v. Nixon,8 "Burger's eyes flashed. He 9 turned and stormed out the door without a word." And when Justice Black-0 mun voted with the more liberal Justices in a 1975 prior-restraint case,' 7. BOB WOODWARD & ScoTT ARMSTRONG, THE BRETHREN: INSIDE THE SUPREME COURT 121-22 (1979). 8. 418 U.S. 683 (1974) superseded by FED. R. EVID. 801(d)(2)(E) (1975). For the basic facts, see WEB Memorandum to the Conference (July 10, 1974) (Box 190, folder 5) (enclosing partial draft); HAB to WEB cc Conference (July 12, 1974) (Box 190, folder 5) ("With your letter of July 10, you recommended and invited suggestions. Ac- cordingly, I take the liberty of suggesting herewith a revised statement of facts and sub- mit it to you for your consideration. [ ] Please believe me when I say that I do this in a spirit of cooperation and not of criticism. I am fully aware of the pressures that presently beset all of us."); Justice Potter Stewart to WEB cc Conference (July 12, 1974) (Box 190, folder 10) (agreeing with Blackmun); Justice Bill Brennan to WEB cc Conference (July 12, 1974) (Box 190, folder 5) (agreeing with Blackmun); WEB Memorandum to the Conference (July 15, 1974) (Box 190, folder 5) ("My effort to accommodate every- one by sending out 'first drafts' is not working out. [ 1] I do not contemplate sending out any more material until it is ready."); Justice Thurgood Marshall to WEB cc Conference (July 15, 1974) (Box 190, folder 5) (agreeing with Blackmun and others); Law Clerk to HAB (July 18, 1974) (Box 191, folder 2) (summarizing Nixon; "I think that there is no question that the CJ's version [of the facts] is not adequate and perhaps he will either use yours or incorporate heavily."); WEB memorandum to Justices (Aug. 26, 1974) (Box 190, folder 5) (stating that the Court is still unanimous; asking that no one talk to press). 9. WOODWARD & ARMSTRONG, supra note 7, at 321. After the incident, Black- mun wrote the Chief Justice to explain. Id. at 321-22. Woodward and Armstrong say that the confrontation became known as the "Et Tu Harry" story. Id. at 322. 10. See Se. Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, 420 U.S. 546 (1975). https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol70/iss4/4 2 Benton and Vahle: Benton: Burger-Blackmun Relationship: 2005] LESSONS FOR COLLEGIALITY "Burger was aghast. He remarked several times to his clerks that he didn't understand what Blackmun was doing. It had to be ''the influence of Stewart and Brennan. The Chief gave no credit to Blackmun." Later commentators reached the same general conclusion. Following Chief Justice Burger's death in 1995, Finlay Lewis wrote a story entitled Terms of Estrangemen: Burger and Blackmun: The Boyhood Pals Who Thought They Knew Each Other.12 After the release of the Blackmun Papers in 2004, Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times published Friendsfor Decades, But Years on the Court Left Them Strangers.13 Days later, Nina Totenberg reported similarly for National Public Radio. 14 Luther Munford, a Blackmun clerk in 1978-79, soon explained: Without question, Blackmun and Burger were childhood friends. One night, Blackmun and his wife invited his clerks to dinner at their apartment. He pulled out an old black-and-white photograph and passed it around. It showed the two as boys. They had taken the picture themselves by rigging a string to the camera and then pulling it as they posed. Almost 60 years later, the trick still brought a smile to Blackmun's face. By 1978, however, Blackmun's problem with Burger was, quite simply, that he thought Burger was way too big for his britches. He told us Burger had made a lot of money in the booming real prop- erty market after he came to the District of Columbia in the 1950s and he lived on an estate in Virginia. Unlike the other justices, he was able to have the court limousine bring him to work each day. Burger had become an afficionado of antiques, fine wines and the English system of barristers, who historically came mostly from that country's upper class. Burger's expansive view of himself showed itself inside the court as well as out. The chief justice, like the others, sat behind the bench in a seat especially made for him. But unlike the others, Burger added a thick pad to his seat that made him look taller. Al- though marble floors had served the court just fine for decades, the chief justice put in a red carpet between the justices' offices. 11. WOODWARD & ARMSTRONG, supra note 7, at 363. 12. Finlay Lewis, Terms of Estrangement: Burger and Blackmun: The Boyhood Pals Who Thought They Knew Each Other, WASH. POST, July 9, 1995, available at 1995 WL 9251334. 13. Linda Greenhouse, Friendsfor Decades, But Years on the Court Left Them Strangers, N.Y. TiMES, Mar. 5, 2004, at AI. 14.
Recommended publications
  • Book Note Justice Thomas’S Inconsistent Originalism

    Book Note Justice Thomas’S Inconsistent Originalism

    BOOK NOTE JUSTICE THOMAS’S INCONSISTENT ORIGINALISM MY GRANDFATHER’S SON: A MEMOIR. By Clarence Thomas.1 New York: HarperCollins Publishers. 2007. Pp. xii, 289. $26.95. Since his infamous confirmation hearings, several of Justice Tho- mas’s biographers2 have struggled to understand and explain the ap- parent conflicts in the life and jurisprudence of a man who acknowl- edges that his conservative views do not comport with the traditional viewpoints of African Americans3 and who advocates an originalist in- terpretation of the Constitution.4 Justice Thomas has received harsh criticism from some of these biographers, and the debate surrounding his adequacy as a Supreme Court Justice has strong political under- pinnings.5 Seeking to correct other accounts of his life, which Justice Thomas views as partly “untrue, at times grossly so” (p. x), My Grand- father’s Son sheds new light on his personal history — especially the key roles race and religion played therein — but generally eschews di- rect discussion of his jurisprudential philosophy. Even so, Justice Thomas’s memoir illuminates his judicial philosophy, because that phi- losophy stems from the experiences and principles discussed in his book. My Grandfather’s Son begins with a description of Justice Tho- mas’s West African ancestry (p. 2) and early childhood. Born in a shanty in Pinpoint, Georgia, on June 23, 1948 (pp. 3–4), Thomas spent his early years fatherless, alongside his mother, Leola; aunt, Annie; and siblings, Emma Mae and Myers (pp. 1, 3). In 1954, Myers accidentally burned down their home (p. 6), and Leola took her sons to live in a de- ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 1 Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States.
  • Reading Clarence Thomas

    Reading Clarence Thomas

    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2004 Reading Clarence Thomas Kendall Thomas Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Kendall Thomas, Reading Clarence Thomas, 18 NAT'L BLACK L. J. 224 (2004). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2172 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAY READING CLARENCE THOMAS Kendall Thomas* The state is INHERENTLY racial, every state institution is a RACIAL institu- tion, and the entire social order is equilabrated (unstably) by the state to preserve the prevailing racial order. -Omi & Winant' Several years ago, a special issue of The New Yorker entitled "Black in America" included an extraordinary profile of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.2 Authored by Jeffrey Rosen, the article begins with an account of Justice Thomas's interventions in two of the most important cases decided during the Court's previous term. In the first of these cases, Missouri v. Jenkins, the Court was called upon to define the constitutional scope and limits of the federal judicial power to address racial concentra- tion in Kansas City's public schools through salary increases and the crea- tion of magnet programs.3 In the second case, Adarand v.
  • Justices' Profiles Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School

    Justices' Profiles Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School

    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Supreme Court Preview Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1995 Section 1: Justices' Profiles Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School, "Section 1: Justices' Profiles" (1995). Supreme Court Preview. 35. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview/35 Copyright c 1995 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview WARREN E. BURGER IS DEAD AT 87 Was Chief Justice for 17 Years Copyright 1995 The New York Times Company The New York Times June 26, 1995, Monday Linda Greenhouse Washington, June 25 - Warren E. Burger, who retired to apply like an epithet -- overruled no major in 1986 after 17 years as the 15th Chief Justice of the decisions from the Warren era. United States, died here today at age 87. The cause It was a further incongruity that despite Chief was congestive heart failure, a spokeswoman for the Justice Burger's high visibility and the evident relish Supreme Court said. with which he used his office to expound his views on An energetic court administrator, Chief Justice everything from legal education to prison Burger was in some respects a transitional figure management, scholars and Supreme Court despite his tenure, the longest for a Chief Justice in commentators continued to question the degree to this century. He presided over a Court that, while it which he actually led the institution over which he so grew steadily more conservative with subsequent energetically presided.
  • CAREERS DONALD SHUM ’13 Is an Associate at Cooley in New York City; ALYSSA KUHN ’13 Is Clerking for Judge Joseph F

    CAREERS DONALD SHUM ’13 Is an Associate at Cooley in New York City; ALYSSA KUHN ’13 Is Clerking for Judge Joseph F

    CAREERS DONALD SHUM ’13 is an associate at Cooley in New York City; ALYSSA KUHN ’13 is clerking for Judge Joseph F. Bianco of the Eastern District of New York after working as an associate at Gibson Dunn in New York; and ZACH TORRES-FOWLER ’12 is an associate at Pepper Hamilton in Philadelphia. THE CAREER SERVICES PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW is one of the most successful among national law VIRGINIA ENJOYS A REPUTATION FOR PRODUCING LAWYERS who master the schools and provides students with a wide range of job intellectual challenges of legal practice, and also contribute broadly to the institutions they join through strong leadership and interpersonal skills. opportunities across the nation and abroad. AS A RESULT, PRIVATE- AND PUBLIC-SECTOR EMPLOYERS HEAVILY RECRUIT VIRGINIA STUDENTS EACH YEAR. Graduates start their careers across the country with large and small law firms, government agencies and public interest groups. ZACHARY REPRESENTATIVE RAY ’16 EMPLOYERS TAYLOR clerked for U.S. CLASSES OF 2015-17 STEFFAN ’15 District Judge clerked for Gershwin A. Judge Patrick Drain of the LOS ANGELES Higginbotham of Eastern District UNITED Hewlett Packard Enterprise Jones Day the 5th U.S. Circuit of Michigan STATES Dentons Jones Day Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Court of Appeals SARAH after law school, Howarth & Smith Reed Smith Morrison & Foerster in Austin, Texas, PELHAM ’16 followed by a ALABAMA Latham & Watkins Simpson Thacher & Bartlett Orrick, Herrington & before returning is an associate clerkship with BIRMINGHAM Mercer Consulting Sullivan & Cromwell Sutcliffe to Washington, with Simpson Judge Roger L. REDWOOD CITY D.C., to work for Thacher & Gregory of the Bradley Arant Boult Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Perkins Coie Covington Bartlett in New 4th U.S.
  • Ross E. Davies, Professor, George Mason University School of Law 10

    Ross E. Davies, Professor, George Mason University School of Law 10

    A CRANK ON THE COURT: THE PASSION OF JUSTICE WILLIAM R. DAY Ross E. Davies, Professor, George Mason University School of Law The Baseball Research Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2, Fall 2009, pp. 94-107 (BRJ is a publication of SABR, the Society for American Baseball Research) George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper Series 10-10 This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1555017 **SABR_BRJ-38.2_final-v2:Layout 1 12/15/09 2:00 PM Page 94 BASEBALL AND LAW A Crank on the Court The Passion of Justice William R. Day Ross E. Davies here is an understandable tendency to date the Not surprisingly, there were plenty of other baseball Supreme Court’s involvement with baseball fans on the Court during, and even before, the period Tfrom 1922, when the Court decided Federal covered by McKenna’s (1898–1925), Day’s (1903–22), Baseball Club of Baltimore v. National League of Pro- and Taft’s (1921–30) service. 13 Chief Justice Edward D. fessional Base Ball Clubs —the original baseball White (1894–1921) 14 and Justices John Marshall Har - antitrust-exemption case. 1 And there is a correspon - lan (1877–1911), 15 Horace H. Lurton (1910–14), 16 and ding tendency to dwell on William Howard Taft—he Mahlon Pitney (1912–22), 17 for example. And no doubt was chief justice when Federal Baseball was decided 2— a thorough search would turn up many more. 18 There is, when discussing early baseball fandom on the Court.
  • Separation of the Governmental System of Powers in This Millennium

    Separation of the Governmental System of Powers in This Millennium

    Separation of the Governmental System of Powers in this Millennium The U.S. government is made up of three branches: Legislative, Executive and Judiciary: Legislative: U.S. Congress. Created and maintained by the People. Its primary objective is to make laws. Executive: The Office of the President. Elected by the People by Electoral College. The President’s primary objective is to represent and lead the country, at home and around the world. The President has not the power to impose law (only rules that can be rescinded quite easily) but possesses the power to VETO laws put forth by Congress. Judiciary: The Supreme Court. Currently composed of 9 individual Justices appointed for life by the President and confirmed by the U.S Senate. Their primary objective is to interpret laws. The Supreme Court is shielded from politics so that it can maintain objectivity in its deliberations. *The President can nominate whomever he/she choses. This individual does not need to be a Judge nor does the individual even need to be a lawyer. That said, the Senate would most likely NOT confirm a person who is not perceived to have adequate experience/expertise. The Framers wrote the U.S. Constitution to ensure the health and preservation of our Democracy. Period. They also created a metric to check the President’s power that has impressively stood the test of time. That is until now. President Trump has stressed the system created to preserve our Democracy more than any single one of his 44 predecessors. Up until now, U.S. Presidents have conducted themselves by a largely unwritten code of conduct primarily outlined in the Oath they take on the steps of the Capital on Inauguration Day.
  • Tales from the Blackmun Papers: a Fuller Appreciation of Harry Blackmun's Judicial Legacy

    Tales from the Blackmun Papers: a Fuller Appreciation of Harry Blackmun's Judicial Legacy

    Missouri Law Review Volume 70 Issue 4 Fall 2005 Article 7 Fall 2005 Tales from the Blackmun Papers: A Fuller Appreciation of Harry Blackmun's Judicial Legacy Joseph F. Kobylka Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Joseph F. Kobylka, Tales from the Blackmun Papers: A Fuller Appreciation of Harry Blackmun's Judicial Legacy, 70 MO. L. REV. (2005) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol70/iss4/7 This Conference is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kobylka: Kobylka: Tales from the Blackmun Papers: Tales from the Blackmun Papers: A Fuller Appreciation of Harry Blackmun's Judicial Legacy Joseph F. Kobylka' This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to termi- enough 2 nate her pregnancy. - Justice Harry A. Blackmun, Roe v. Wade I believe we must analyze respondent Hardwick's claim in the light of the values that underlie the constitutional right to privacy. If that right means anything, it means that, before Georgia can prosecute its citizens for making choices about the most intimate aspects of their lives, it must do more than assert that the choice they have made3 is an "'abominable crime not fit to be named among Christians.' - Justice Harry A.
  • Opinion Assignment on the Rehnquist Court

    Opinion Assignment on the Rehnquist Court

    Opinion assignment on the Rehnquist Court Rehnquist’s opinion assignments reflected his ability to balance both the Court’s organizational needs and, occasionally, strategic policy considerations. by FORREST MALTZMAN and PAUL J. WAHLBECK ARTVILLE hen William H. Rehnquist replaced Warren E. completed their work efficiently.4 Rehnquist’s preference Burger as chief justice in 1986, administration for allowing the Court’s administrative needs to guide his Wof the Supreme Court changed markedly. In his opinion assignments was especially pronounced as the 17 years on the job, Chief Justice Burger was reputed to end of the term approached. act strategically to advance his policy objectives. Critics Our account certainly comports with Rehnquist’s own complained that he cast “phony votes” and manipulated description of the factors he weighed in making assign- the assignment of opinions to his brethren.1 For exam- ments: “I tried to be as evenhanded as possible as far as ple, Justice William O. Douglas charged the chief with numbers of cases assigned to each justice, but as the term attempting to “bend the Court to his will by manipulating goes on I take into consid- NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY assignments” when Chief Justice Burger assigned the task eration the extent to of writing the majority opinion in Roe v. Wade to his col- which the various justices league, fellow Nixon appointee Harry A. Blackman.2 are current in writing and As chief justice, Rehnquist claimed that he approached the task of opinion assignment in a strikingly different manner. “This is an important responsibility,” Rehnquist Justice Harry A. Blackmun, whose papers contain once observed, “and it is desirable that it be discharged 3 the assignment sheets carefully and fairly.” Quantitative analysis of patterns in that the chief justice Rehnquist’s assignment of opinions confirms that he circulated at the close of administered this task largely consistent with the goal of every oral argument.
  • Clerk and Justice: the Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B

    Clerk and Justice: the Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenCommons at University of Connecticut University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2008 Clerk and Justice: The Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B. Rutledge Laura Krugman Ray Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Recommended Citation Ray, Laura Krugman, "Clerk and Justice: The Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B. Rutledge" (2008). Connecticut Law Review. 5. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/5 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 41 NOVEMBER 2008 NUMBER 1 Article Clerk and Justice: The Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B. Rutledge LAURA KRUGMAN RAY Justice John Paul Stevens, now starting his thirty-third full term on the Supreme Court, served as law clerk to Justice Wiley B. Rutledge during the Court’s 1947 Term. That experience has informed both elements of Stevens’s jurisprudence and aspects of his approach to his institutional role. Like Rutledge, Stevens has written powerful opinions on issues of individual rights, the Establishment Clause, and the reach of executive power in wartime. Stevens has also, like Rutledge, been a frequent author of dissents and concurrences, choosing to express his divergences from the majority rather than to vote in silence. Within his chambers, Stevens has in many ways adopted his own clerkship experience in preference to current models. Unlike the practices of most of his colleagues, Stevens hires fewer clerks, writes his own first drafts, and shares certiorari decisionmaking with his clerks.
  • Clarence Thomas Takes Oath As Court's 106Th Justice

    Clarence Thomas Takes Oath As Court's 106Th Justice

    THE SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME XII NUMBER 4,1991 Clarence Thomas Takes Oath as Court's 106th Justice CourtesyLois Long, Officeof the Curator of the Court In a ceremony held on the South Lawn ofthe White House on October 18,1991, Judge Clarence Thomas took the officialoath of a federal government official prior to becoming the 106th member of the Supreme Court of the United States. Justice Byron R. White administered this oath. The judicial oath was a administered by ChiefJustice Willijun H. Rehnquist at a private fi&QSpfM ceremony on October 23, 1991 so that he might commence his work on the Court. A more traditional ceremonywasheld in the Supreme Court Chamber on November 1, 1991 in which Chief Justice Rehnquist readministered the oath to Justice Thomas who then assumed his seat on the Bench. Courtesy Lois Long, Office of the Curatorof the Court The ChiefJustice looks on as Justice Thomas signs his judicial oath of officeas part ofthe ceremony held at the Supreme Court on November 1,1991. Justice Thomas was sworn in at a public ceremony held in the Supreme Court Chamber. Justice Thomas fills the seat vacated by the retirement of Justice Thurgood Marshall. Justice Thomas was bornonJune23, 1948, inPinPoint, Georgia. Hisearly childhood years were spent in Georgia where he attended parochial school much ofthe time. After briefly attending Immaculate Conception Seminary in Mis souri , Justice Thomas entered Holy Cross College in Worcester, At a White House ceremony, Judge Clarence Thomas (left Massachusetts. He graduated from Holy Cross with honors, foreground) takes the olTiclal oath of office required of all finishing ninth in his class and then entered Yale Law School, government officials.
  • Sanct. That the Principal of Equality of Justice for All Has T

    Sanct. That the Principal of Equality of Justice for All Has T

    223 We are saying that there are certain things that should be sacro- sanct. That the principal of equality of justice for all has to have meaning, and that indeed, people who have views on individual rights and on sex discrimination, that put in question our whole records on how to end discrimination in affirmative action, should not be confirmed, because all we will be doing is reliving the bat- tles of the 1950's and the 1960's again and again, and it is enough. Senator BIDEN. Thank you. Senator MATHIAS. Once again, I think, for the second time, I thank you for your attendance at this hearing Mr. GOLD. And thank you for your patience, Senator. Senator MATHIAS [continuing]. And your very helpful comments. We appreciate it. Mr. RAUH. Thank you, sir. Senator BIDEN. Thank you all. Senator MATHIAS. May I inquire if Mr. Roy C. Jones of the Liber- ty Federation is in the room? Is Mr. Jones in the room? [No response.] Senator MATHIAS. Then our third panel will be composed of Mrs. LaHaye, the president of Concerned Women for America; Mr. Bruce Fein of United Families Foundation; Miss Sally Katzen, a lawyer with Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering; and Mr. Jack Fuller, the editorial editor of the Chicago Tribune. If you will all raise your right hands. Do you swear that the tes- timony you will give in this proceeding will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Mrs. LAHAYE. I do. Mr. FEIN. I do. Ms. KATZEN. I do.
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to The

    Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to The

    Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to the Senate December 16, 2011 The following list does not include promotions of members of the Uniformed Services, nominations to the Service Academies, or nominations of Foreign Service Officers. Submitted January 5 Arenda L. Wright Allen, of Virginia, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, vice Jerome B. Friedman, retired. Anthony J. Battaglia, of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California, vice M. James Lorenz, retired. Cathy Bissoon, of Pennsylvania, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, vice Thomas M. Hardiman, elevated. James Emanuel Boasberg, of the District of Columbia, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia, vice Thomas F. Hogan, retired. Vincent L. Briccetti, of New York, to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, vice Kimba M. Wood, retired. Louis B. Butler, Jr., of Wisconsin, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Wisconsin, vice John C. Shabaz, retired. Susan L. Carney, of Connecticut, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, vice Barrington D. Parker, retired. Claire C. Cecchi, of New Jersey, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of New Jersey, vice Joseph A. Greenaway, elevated. Edward Milton Chen, of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of California, vice Martin J. Jenkins, resigned. Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., of North Carolina, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, vice Lacy H.