South Carolina Law Review Volume 61 Issue 3 THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT: ITS TRADITION, ITS JURISPRUUDENCE, AND ITS FUTURE Article 4 SYMPOSIUM and ANNUAL FOURTH CIRCUIT SURVEY Spring 2010 Fourth Circuit Judicial Appointments Carl Tobias University of Richmond School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Tobias, Carl (2010) "Fourth Circuit Judicial Appointments," South Carolina Law Review: Vol. 61 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr/vol61/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you by the Law Reviews and Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in South Carolina Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Tobias: Fourth Circuit Judicial Appointments FOURTH CIRCUIT JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS CARL TOBIAS* Federal judicial selection has become increasingly controversial.1 Accusations and recriminations, divisive partisanship, and continuing paybacks have suffused the appellate court confirmation process. 2 These phenomena were pervasive during the George W. Bush Administration, particularly affecting his appointments to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Instructive examples are the nominations of U.S. District Court Judge Terrence Boyle and Department of Defense General Counsel William J. Haynes II, whom President Bush renominated multiple times, with both Democratic and Republican senators opposing