DOCSLIB.ORG

Linnaeus Lecture Series Booklet #1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Convention on Biological Diversity Linnaeus Lecture Series Photo courtsey of Colin Purrington/flickr.com Photo courtesy of C. Buddle Photo courtesy of C. Buddle www.cbd.int © 2007 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity Preface Linnaeus: The Father of Sustainable Development On 23 May 2007, the world celebrated the 300th an- niversary of the birth of Carl Linnaeus, the Swedish scientist who created the science and system used to Students are the best harbinger of the future. When Carl Linnaeus, the father of taxonomy, uniquely classify all living things. To mark this tricen- presented his bid for a professor’s chair at Uppsala University, students did not look kindly tennial anniversary, the Secretariat of the Convention to his competitor. In a riotous gesture, they ripped the competitor’s dissertation into pieces on Biological Diversity, in collaboration with the King- during his defence. Like his students, Linnaeus tore through previous systems of naming dom of Sweden and the United Nations Educational, organisms and bequeathed to the world the most enduring tool for remembering life on Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), has earth. launched the Linnaeus Lecture series. In doing so, the As the father of taxonomy, Linnaeus was inspired by the desire to find plants and other Secretariat pays tribute to an historic citizen of Sweden Photo courtesy of CBD organisms of practical utility to Sweden. He strongly believed in “botanical innovation” as for his unique contribution in promoting taxonomy and substitute for military conquest as a way to secure the resources needed for the welfare of advancing the knowledge of nature and at the same time honors Sweden for hosting the the Swedish people. By focusing on botanical innovation, Linnaeus helped to lay the foun- United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in June 1972 that led to creation of dation for what we today call “sustainable development”. But more importantly, Linnaeus’ the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the host organization of the Conven- most enduring contribution is bringing the best scientific and technological knowledge to tion on Biological Diversity (CBD) and 18 other multilateral environmental agreements. The address sustainability challenges. inaugural Linnaeus lecture took place on Wednesday, 23 May 2007, at the CBD Secre- tariat in Montreal, Canada. Mr. Yvo de Boer, the Executive Secretary of the United Nations Linnaeus proclaimed that “each country produces something especially useful”. But it is Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Mr. Peter Bridgewater, the Secre- only “by the help of reason man tames the fiercest animals, pursues and catches the swift- tary-General of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, and Mr. Frederik Alfer, the Second est, nay he is able to reach even those, which lye hidden in the bottom of the sea.” But Secretary at the Embassy of Sweden in Ottawa were the guest speakers. In line with the drawing our attention to the role of species in human welfare and focusing on self-suf- theme for the 2007 International Day for Biological Diversity, the first lecture, on “What Lin- ficiency, Linnaeus also provided initial ideas that have come to shape our thinking about naeus would have thought of climate change”, focused on the links between climate change sustainable development. and biodiversity. The 300th anniversary of the birth of Linnaeus coincides with the 20th anniversary of the The CBD Linnaeus Lectures will be organized on a regular basis at the margins of major release of Our Common Future, the report of the World Commission on Environment and meetings of the Convention and in particular during the meetings of the Conference of the Development (chaired by Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Brundtland). There can be no bet- Parties. Eminent personalities will be invited to share their perspectives and visions on ter moment than now to reflect on 300 years of conservation practice and to map a new the challenges to biodiversity and opportunities it provides within the context of achieving vision for the future that brings scientific and technological knowledge to bear on conserva- sustainable development. It is expected that the next CBD Linnaeus Lecture will take place tion. It is the dawn of the age of conservation innovation. at the margins of the ninth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to be held in Bonn, Germany from 19 to 30 May 2008. I also sincerely hope that, in the future, the CBD and Sweden can jointly establish a Linnaeus award to honour scientists who bridge science and Calestous Juma PhD, FRS policy. Professor of the Practice of International Development Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Ahmed Djoghlaf Former Executive Secretary Executive Secretary United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity The Biography of Carl Linnaeus The Legacy of Linnaeus (1707-1778) Carl Linnaeus was a renowned botanist, physician and zoologist and one of the most in- fluential scientists in history. He attempted to describe the natural world in its entirety and l Born 23 May 1707 in the southern Swedish province, of Småland. explore the relationships between groups of organisms and individual species. He is known l Studied medicine in Sweden at Lund University, transferring after a year to Uppsala as “the father of modern taxonomy,” “the father of botany” and has also been called the first University. He finished his medical degree at the University of Harderwijk in the Neth- ecologist. He was the first to define the human being as an animal among other animals, erlands in 1735, and then enrolled in the University of Leiden. naming us Homo sapiens. l During his studies at Uppsala, Linnaeus organized botanical and ethnographical Linnaeus’ most famous contributions to science: expeditions to the largely unexplored Lapland region and to central Sweden. Lin- Popularization of Binomial Nomenclature naeus traveled extensively, undertaking many research trips to England, France and Germany but spent most of his time in Holland, where he was extremely productive Binomial nomenclature is the Latin scientific name of a species that is formed by the com- in publishing many important works. bination of the genus and species name (e.g. Homo sapiens). Although Linnaeus was not the first to use binomial nomenclature, he was the first to use it consistently, and it is now l Although he published over 180 works, one of his most famous is Systema Naturae the scientific standard internationally. (1735-70), which began as an 11-page pamphlet but expanded into a multi-volume work encompassing some 15,000 species. Another famous work is Species Plan- Taxonomic Classification System tarum (1753), where every known species of plant at the time was identified and Linnaeus sought a universal classification of all creation within a hierarchy based on mor- documented. phological characteristics. At the top were three Kingdoms: Animalia for animals, Vegetabi- l Linnaeus returned to Sweden in 1738 where he practiced medicine in Stockholm, lia for plants and Mineralia for minerals. Kingdoms were divided into Classes, Classes into specializing in the treatment of syphilis. Orders, Orders into Genera, which were in turn divided into Species. Although, the clas- sification system used today is based on Linnaean taxonomy, much has been re-classified l Married Sara Elizabeth Moraea in 1739 and had two sons and four daughters. due to new discoveries and scientific progress, especially with the advent of phylogenetic l Appointed chair of medicine at Uppsala University in 1741. In 1742, he exchanged systematics and genomics. his chairmanship to botany and made three more expeditions to various parts of Sweden. l His lectures attracted students from all over the world and he arranged to send many of them on expeditions abroad. l Linnaeus became chief royal physician in 1747. l In 1761 he was ennobled by the King of Sweden and became Carl von Linné. l He retired in 1776 and was permitted to appoint as his successor his son Carl the Younger at the University. l Linnaeus died on 10 January 1778 in Uppsala, after a lengthy period of deteriorat- ing health. He is buried in Uppsala Cathedral. Photo courtesy of C. Buddle Photo courtesy of Micheal Wallace/flickr.com Linnaeus borealis: Linnaeus’ favorite plant and per- Statue of Linnaeus at Woodward Park sonal symbol when he was ennobled. This plant is also in Tulsa, Oklahoma the emblem of Linnaeus’ home province. Linnaeus Lectures Linnaeus Lectures Summary of presentations from the Presentation by Mr. Yvo de Boer, Executive Secretary of the inaugural Linnaeus Lecture United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: Climate Change Challenges Remarks by Mr. Fredrik Alfer, Second Secretary, Embassy of Swe- The CBD and the UNFCCC have a long tradition of collaboration. Many linkages between climate den in Ottawa change and biodiversity exist, and experts have Noting that Linnaeus developed the binary sys- been exploring ways to address these linkages tem of nomenclature for classifying animals and and identify synergies. Mr. de Boer focused on plants, and was also a medical doctor, zoolo- elements of the climate change process that are gist and writer, Mr. Alfer said that when reading of interest to the CBD, as well as their directions what Linnaeus wrote in the 1750s, “it becomes in the future. apparent that he was very concerned about the New scientific findings and increase in interest human impact of nature and that today he would in climate change have contributed to putting cli- Photo courtesy of CBD surely be called an environmentalist.” Mr. Alfer mate change at the center of high-level political emphasized that the aim of the tricentennial debates within and outside the UN process, including the UN Security Council, the G8 and celebrations is to “increase interest in science, G8+ 5.
Recommended publications
  • The Scientist from a Flourishing Sex-Life to Modern DNA Technology

    The Scientist from a Flourishing Sex-Life to Modern DNA Technology

    The Scientist From a Flourishing Sex-life to Modern DNA Technology Linnaeus the Scientist ll of a sudden you are standing there, in the bo- tanic garden that is to be Linnaeus’s base for a whole lifetime of scientific achievements. It is a beautiful spring day in Uppsala, the sun’s rays warm your heart as cheerfully as in your own 21st century. The hus- tle and bustle of the town around you break into the cen- trally located garden. Carriage wheels rattle over the cob- blestones, horses neigh, hens cackle from the house yards. The acrid smell of manure and privies bears witness to a town atmosphere very different from your own. You cast a glance at what is growing in the garden. The beds do not look particularly well kept. In fact, the whole garden gives a somewhat dilapidated impression. Suddenly, in the distance, you see a young man squat- A ting down by one of the beds. He is looking with great concentration at a small flower, examining it closely through a magnifying glass. When he lifts his head for a moment and ponders, you recognise him at once. It is Carl von Linné, or Carl Linnaeus as he was originally called. He looks very young, just over 20 years old. His pale cheeks tell you that it has been a harsh winter. His first year as a university student at Uppsala has been marked by a lack of money for both food and clothes as well as for wood to warm his rented room. 26 linnaean lessons • www.bioresurs.uu.se © 2007 Swedish Centre for School Biology and Biotechnology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
  • Of Dahlia Myths.Pub

    Of Dahlia Myths.Pub

    Cavanilles’ detailed illustrations established the dahlia in the botanical taxonomy In 1796, the third volume of “Icones” introduced two more dahlia species, named D. coccinea and D. rosea. They also were initially thought to be sunflowers and had been brought to Spain as part of the Alejandro Malaspina/Luis Neé expedition. More than 600 drawings brought the plant collection to light. Cavanilles, whose extensive correspondence included many of Europe’s leading botanists, began to develop a following far greater than his title of “sacerdote” (priest, in French Abbé) ever would have offered. The A. J. Cavanilles archives of the present‐day Royal Botanical Garden hold the botanist’s sizable oeu‐ vre, along with moren tha 1,300 letters, many dissertations, studies, and drawings. In time, Cavanilles achieved another goal: in 1801, he was finally appointed professor and director of the garden. Regrettably, he died in Madrid on May 10, 1804. The Cavanillesia, a tree from Central America, was later named for this famousMaterial Spanish scientist. ANDERS DAHL The lives of Dahl and his Spanish ‘godfather’ could not have been any more different. Born March 17,1751, in Varnhem town (Västergötland), this Swedish botanist struggled with health and financial hardship throughout his short life. While attending school in Skara, he and several teenage friends with scientific bent founded the “Swedish Topographic Society of Skara” and sought to catalogue the natural world of their community. With his preacher father’s support, the young Dahl enrolled on April 3, 1770, at Uppsala University in medicine, and he soon became one of Carl Linnaeus’ students.
  • Linn E and Taxonomy in Japan: on the 300Th Anniversary of His Birth

    Linn E and Taxonomy in Japan: on the 300Th Anniversary of His Birth

    No. 3] Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B 86 (2010) 143 Linne and taxonomy in Japan: On the 300th anniversary of his birth By Akihito (His Majesty The Emperor of Japan) (Communicated by Koichiro TSUNEWAKI, M.J.A.) President, dear friends bers of stamens belonged to dierent classes, even when their other characteristics were very similar, I am very grateful to the Linnean Society of while species with the same number of stamens be- London for the kind invitation it extended to me to longed to the same class, even when their other participate in the celebration of the 300th anniver- characteristics were very dierent. This led to the sary of the birth of Carl von Linne. When, in 1980, I idea that the classication of organisms should be was elected as a foreign member of the Society, I felt based on a more comprehensive evaluation of all I did not really deserve the honour, but it has given their characteristics. This idea gained increasing me great encouragement as I have tried to continue support, and Linne’s classication system was even- my research, nding time between my ofcial duties. tually replaced by systems based on phylogeny. Today, I would like to speak in memory of Carl The binomial nomenclature proposed by Linne, von Linne, and address the question of how Euro- however, became the basis of the scientic names of pean scholarship has developed in Japan, touching animals and plants, which are commonly used in the upon the work of people like Carl Peter Thunberg, world today, not only by people in academia but also Linne’s disciple who stayed in Japan for a year as by the general public.
  • Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, History of Botanical Nomenclature

    Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, History of Botanical Nomenclature

    Module – 15; Content writer: AvishekBhattacharjee Module 15: Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, history of botanical nomenclature (local and scientific) and its advantages, formation of code. Content writer: Dr.AvishekBhattacharjee, Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P.O. – B. Garden, Howrah – 711 103. Module – 15; Content writer: AvishekBhattacharjee Botanical Nomenclature:Concept – A name is a handle by which a mental image is passed. Names are just labels we use to ensure we are understood when we communicate. Nomenclature is a mechanism for unambiguous communication about the elements of taxonomy. Botanical Nomenclature, i.e. naming of plants is that part of plant systematics dealing with application of scientific names to plants according to some set rules. It is related to, but distinct from taxonomy. A botanical name is a unique identifier to which information of a taxon can be attached, thus enabling the movement of data across languages, scientific disciplines, and electronic retrieval systems. A plant’s name permits ready summarization of information content of the taxon in a nested framework. A systemofnamingplantsforscientificcommunicationmustbe international inscope,andmustprovideconsistencyintheapplicationof names.Itmustalsobeacceptedbymost,ifnotall,membersofthe scientific community. These criteria led, almost inevitably, to International Botanical Congresses (IBCs) being the venue at which agreement on a system of scientific nomenclature for plants was sought. The IBCs led to publication of different ‘Codes’ which embodied the rules and regulations of botanical nomenclature and the decisions taken during these Congresses. Advantages ofBotanical Nomenclature: Though a common name may be much easier to remember, there are several good reasons to use botanical names for plant identification. Common names are not unique to a specific plant.
  • Instr Uct Or's Guide Science

    Instr Uct Or's Guide Science

    Scientists Of The Past SCIENCE Lesson Objectives • Students will compare and contrast how the rules of society restricted the progress of science in the past. • Students will list several famous scientists from history. Activities Checklist In this lesson, the student will • Watch the instructional video about how the rules of society restricted the progress of science in the past and the scientists who, over time, were able to break away from these restrictions • Interact with My Book and learn about how the rules of society restricted the progress of science in the past • Complete the crossword puzzle, in the Science Activities Workbook, by determining the scientist who made each cited discovery • Complete all learning activities assessing understanding of the sequence of scientifi c events and discoveries Video Summary Students are given a modern-day scenario of reading something aloud in front of the classroom to better understand the stress scientists felt during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when they were presenting new scientifi c theories to society. Scientists of the past were not always respected. Sometimes publicly voicing their scientifi c opinions could result in jail, exile, or even death. Religion determined what could or could not be accepted as explanations and discoveries. When a scientist would come up with a new explanation for why something occurred in nature, he or she would often have to argue the claim against the church -- and the church always won. After many, many years, the scientifi c community was able to break away from the church, resulting in numerous scientifi c endeavors. Some of the most famous scientists include Anton van Leeuwenhoek (improved the microscope), Carl Linnaeus (developed the classifi cation of life on Earth), Charles Darwin (developed the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection), and Albert Einstein (worked within mathematics, GUIDE INSTRUCTOR’S physics, and astronomy).
  • Linnaeus at Home

    Linnaeus at Home

    NATURE-BASED ACTIVITIES FOR PARENTS LINNAEUS 1 AT HOME A GuiDE TO EXPLORING NATURE WITH CHILDREN Acknowledgements Written by Joe Burton Inspired by Carl Linnaeus With thanks to editors and reviewers: LINNAEUS Lyn Baber, Melissa Balzano, Jane Banham, Sarah Black, Isabelle Charmantier, Mark Chase, Maarten Christenhusz, Alex Davey, Gareth Dauley, AT HOME Zia Forrai, Jon Hale, Simon Hiscock, Alice ter Meulen, Lynn Parker, Elizabeth Rollinson, James Rosindell, Daryl Stenvoll-Wells, Ross Ziegelmeier Share your explorations @LinneanLearning #LinnaeusAtHome Facing page: Carl Linnaeus paper doll, illustrated in 1953. © Linnean Society of London 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrival system or trasmitted in any form or by any means without the prior consent of the copyright owner. www.linnean.org/learning “If you do not know Introduction the names of things, the knowledge of them is Who was Carl Linnaeus? Contents Pitfall traps 5 lost too” Carl Linnaeus was one of the most influential scientists in the world, - Carl Linnaeus A bust of ‘The Young Linnaeus’ by but you might not know a lot about him. Thanks to Linnaeus, we Bug hunting 9 Anthony Smith (2007). have a naming system for all species so that we can understand how different species are related and can start to learn about the origins Plant hunting 13 of life on Earth. Pond dipping 17 As a young man, Linnaeus would study the animals, plants, Bird feeders 21 minerals and habitats around him. By watching the natural world, he began to understand that all living things are adapted to their Squirrel feeders 25 environments and that they can be grouped together by their characteristics (like animals with backbones, or plants that produce Friendly spaces 29 spores).
  • Names of Botanical Genera Inspired by Mythology

    Names of Botanical Genera Inspired by Mythology

    Names of botanical genera inspired by mythology Iliana Ilieva * University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2021, 14(03), 008–018 Publication history: Received on 16 January 2021; revised on 15 February 2021; accepted on 17 February 2021 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.14.3.0050 Abstract The present article is a part of the project "Linguistic structure of binomial botanical denominations". It explores the denominations of botanical genera that originate from the names of different mythological characters – deities, heroes as well as some gods’ attributes. The examined names are picked based on “Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora”, Sofia, 2012. The names of the plants are arranged in alphabetical order. Beside each Latin name is indicated its English common name and the family that the particular genus belongs to. The article examines the etymology of each name, adding a short account of the myth based on which the name itself is created. An index of ancient authors at the end of the article includes the writers whose works have been used to clarify the etymology of botanical genera names. Keywords: Botanical genera names; Etymology; Mythology 1. Introduction The present research is a part of the larger project "Linguistic structure of binomial botanical denominations", based on “Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora”, Sofia, 2012 [1]. The article deals with the botanical genera appellations that originate from the names of different mythological figures – deities, heroes as well as some gods’ attributes. According to ICBN (International Code of Botanical Nomenclature), "The name of a genus is a noun in the nominative singular, or a word treated as such, and is written with an initial capital letter (see Art.
  • Historical Review of Systematic Biology and Nomenclature - Alessandro Minelli

    Historical Review of Systematic Biology and Nomenclature - Alessandro Minelli

    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. II - Historical Review of Systematic Biology and Nomenclature - Alessandro Minelli HISTORICAL REVIEW OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY AND NOMENCLATURE Alessandro Minelli Department of Biology, Via U. Bassi 58B, I-35131, Padova,Italy Keywords: Aristotle, Belon, Cesalpino, Ray, Linnaeus, Owen, Lamarck, Darwin, von Baer, Haeckel, Sokal, Sneath, Hennig, Mayr, Simpson, species, taxa, phylogeny, phenetic school, phylogenetic school, cladistics, evolutionary school, nomenclature, natural history museums. Contents 1. The Origins 2. From Classical Antiquity to the Renaissance Encyclopedias 3. From the First Monographers to Linnaeus 4. Concepts and Definitions: Species, Homology, Analogy 5. The Impact of Evolutionary Theory 6. The Last Few Decades 7. Nomenclature 8. Natural History Collections Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary The oldest roots of biological systematics are found in folk taxonomies, which are nearly universally developed by humankind to cope with the diversity of the living world. The logical background to the first modern attempts to rationalize the classifications was provided by Aristotle's logic, as embodied in Cesalpino's 16th century classification of plants. Major advances were provided in the following century by Ray, who paved the way for the work of Linnaeus, the author of standard treatises still regarded as the starting point of modern classification and nomenclature. Important conceptual progress was due to the French comparative anatomists of the early 19th century UNESCO(Cuvier, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire) – andEOLSS to the first work in comparative embryology of von Baer. Biological systematics, however, was still searching for a unifying principle that could provide the foundation for a natural, rather than conventional, classification.SAMPLE This principle wasCHAPTERS provided by evolutionary theory: its effects on classification are already present in Lamarck, but their full deployment only happened in the 20th century.
  • Using Te Reo Māori and Ta Re Moriori in Taxonomy

    Using Te Reo Māori and Ta Re Moriori in Taxonomy

    VealeNew Zealand et al.: Te Journal reo Ma- oriof Ecologyin taxonomy (2019) 43(3): 3388 © 2019 New Zealand Ecological Society. 1 REVIEW Using te reo Māori and ta re Moriori in taxonomy Andrew J. Veale1,2* , Peter de Lange1 , Thomas R. Buckley2,3 , Mana Cracknell4, Holden Hohaia2, Katharina Parry5 , Kamera Raharaha-Nehemia6, Kiri Reihana2 , Dave Seldon2,3 , Katarina Tawiri2 and Leilani Walker7 1Unitec Institute of Technology, 139 Carrington Road, Mt Albert, Auckland 1025, New Zealand 2Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, St Johns, Auckland 1072, New Zealand 3School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3A Symonds St, Auckland CBD, Auckland 1010, New Zealand 4Rongomaiwhenua-Moriori, Kaiangaroa, Chatham Island, New Zealand 5Massey University, Private Bag 11222 Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand 6Ngāti Kuri, Otaipango, Ngataki, Te Aupouri, Northland, New Zealand 7Auckland University of Technology, 55 Wellesley St E, Auckland CBS, Auckland 1010, New Zealand *Author for correspondence (Email: [email protected]) Published online: 28 November 2019 Auheke: Ko ngā ingoa Linnaean ka noho hei pou mō te pārongo e pā ana ki ngā momo koiora. He mea nui rawa kia mārama, kia ahurei hoki ngā ingoa pūnaha whakarōpū. Me pēnei kia taea ai te whakawhitiwhiti kōrero ā-pūtaiao nei. Nā tēnā kua āta whakatakotohia ētahi ture, tohu ārahi hoki hei whakahaere i ngā whakamārama pūnaha whakarōpū. Kua whakamanahia ēnei kia noho hei tikanga mō te ao pūnaha whakarōpū. Heoi, arā noa atu ngā hua o te tukanga waihanga ingoa Linnaean mō ngā momo koiora i tua atu i te tautohu noa i ngā momo koiora. Ko tētahi o aua hua ko te whakarau: (1) i te mātauranga o ngā iwi takatake, (2) i te kōrero rānei mai i te iwi o te rohe, (3) i ngā kōrero pūrākau rānei mō te wāhi whenua.
  • Why Mammals Are Called Mammals: Gender Politics in Eighteenth-Century Natural History Author(S): Londa Schiebinger Source: the American Historical Review, Vol

    Why Mammals Are Called Mammals: Gender Politics in Eighteenth-Century Natural History Author(S): Londa Schiebinger Source: the American Historical Review, Vol

    Why Mammals are Called Mammals: Gender Politics in Eighteenth-Century Natural History Author(s): Londa Schiebinger Source: The American Historical Review, Vol. 98, No. 2 (Apr., 1993), pp. 382-411 Published by: American Historical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2166840 Accessed: 22/01/2010 10:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aha. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Historical Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Historical Review. http://www.jstor.org Why Mammals Are Called Mammals: Gender Politics in Eighteenth-Century Natural History LONDA SCHIEBINGER IN 1758, IN THE TENTH EDITION OF HIS Systema naturae, Carolus Linnaeus introduced the term Mammaliainto zoological taxonomy.
  • Rules of Botanical Nomenclature

    Rules of Botanical Nomenclature

    Taxonomy Prof.(Dr.) Punam Jeswal Head M.Sc semester II Botany Department Rules of Botanical Nomenclature Definition - Nomenclature is the art of naming of objects, which deals with the determination of a correct name to a known plant or to a known taxon. The names indeed correspond to the sentence, as both constitute meaningful collection of words. A name indicates a noun that helps in the quick identification, easy communication and economy of memory about the object to which it is concerned. Types of Names - The names according to their range of audience, language, territorial coverage and governance are of two types :- 1. Common or vernacular names. 2. International or scientific names. Common or Vernacular Names - These names are of the locals, by the locals, for the locals, in the local dialect. That is when a local plant is named by native people for the identification and communication to the other people of the same territory in their won local dialect, it is referred to as local or common or vernacular name. The fundamental demerits of this name are that they have limited audience, small territorial coverage and not governed under any set of principles or rules and even the same plant may have more than one name in the same locality. Another demerit of concern regarding these names is presence of synonyms in the languages therefore; the same plant may have a variety of names at different places in different languages. As for instance, mango(Mangifera indica) posses more than fifty names in Sanskrit only and lotus is known by more than two dozen names in Sanskrit and Hindi languages.
  • Dissertation Ch 2

    Dissertation Ch 2

    Disenchantment and Re-enchantment: Rhetorical Tension in the Siècle des Lumières A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Sean P. Killackey IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Daniel Brewer DECEMBER 2020 © Sean P. Killackey, 2020 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank the members of my committee, without whom none of this project would have seen the light of day. I am deeply grateful to Dan Brewer, Juliette Cherbuliez, Mary Franklin-Brown, and Michael Gaudio for their commitment and perseverance in seeing this dissertation project through to its completion. Before this dissertation even took shape, their courses and scholarship inspired new avenues of intellectual pursuit for me. I am particularly grateful for the many conversations at workshops, in offices and hallways, and after myriad speaker events with each of them during the development of ideas that would eventually coalesce into a dissertation project. I would like to express my deep and enduring gratitude to my advisor, Daniel Brewer, who read countless revisions with patience and tirelessly gave diplomatic and insightful feedback, challenging my assumptions and posing questions that lead me to more fruitful exploration and stronger writing. His intellectual guidance for this project over the long duration is a testament to his perseverance and his passion for critical inquiry into the literature and culture of the eighteenth century. I sincerely thank Juliette Cherbuliez for chairing my committee and for her advice on the importance of working with people who “ask great questions.” Her brilliant and challenging questions impacted my thinking on this project, perhaps more than she even knows.