Inter-War, Inter-Service Friction on the North-West Frontier of India and Its Impact on the Development and Application of Royal Air Force Doctrine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inter-War, Inter-Service Friction on the North-West Frontier of India and Its Impact on the Development and Application of Royal Air Force Doctrine Inter-War, Inter-Service Friction on the North-West Frontier of India and its Impact on the Development and Application of Royal Air Force Doctrine By Andrew John Charles Walters A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham June 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract ABSTRACT India’s North-West Frontier was the one area where the British Raj could suffer a knockout blow from either external Russian invasion or internal revolt. Frontier defence was amongst the greatest burdens during India’s inter-War financial austerity. Despite the RAF’s operational and financial efficacy in 1920s Iraq, air control was never implemented on the Frontier and air power’s potential was never fully exploited. Instead, aircraft were employed to enhance the Army’s traditional battlefield capabilities, resulting in efficient tactical co-ordination during the 1930s Waziristan campaign - the RAF’s most operationally-active pre-War theatre. To address why air power was constrained on the Frontier, this Thesis examines the inter-War relationship between the Armies in India and the RAF and its impact on the development and application of RAF doctrine. It concludes that the conservatively-natured Indian Armies were slow to recognise the conceptual shift required to fully exploit air power. This entrenchment was reinforced by inter-Service rivalry and the threat of aircraft replacing land forces with a concomitant loss of political standing. The enduring high-level internecine conflict resulted in the squandering of both resources and the opportunity to test independent, ‘strategic’ air power theory prior to the Second World War. Its legacy impacted on Army-RAF relations into the War. ii Dedication DEDICATION To my wife and children, for their forbearance iii Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their support during the research for this Thesis. My thanks go to my inspirational, erstwhile navigator, Air Chief Marshal Sir Stu Peach, for sparking my interest in air power. I am extremely grateful for the Portal Fellowship granted by the Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Sir Glenn Torpy, and am beholden for the support of the RAF Directors of Defence Studies and their staff over the last few years, particularly Air Commodore Neville Parton and Ms Jane Curtis. I would like to thank the staffs of the various archives I was allowed access to, including the India Office Records in the British Library and The National Archives, particularly Harriet Pilcher in the Records Copying Department. I am grateful for the prompt help of the Librarians at the Royal United Services Institute, Laura Dimmock and Tony Pilmer, Justin Saddington at the National Army Museum, Lynn Gamma at the Air Force Historical Research Agency, Seb Cox and his staff at the RAF Air Historical Branch, Peter Elliott and the staff of the RAF Museum’s Department of Research and Information Services, John Hodgson at the John Rylands Library, and the staff of Christ Church Library, including their photographer, Alina Nachescu and their talented archivist, Elizabeth Piper. I would like to extend my deepest appreciation to two custodians in particular. Mr Chris Hobson, formerly the Head of Library Services at the UK Defence Academy, has been unfailingly responsive and helpful with my long list of requests. Similarly, I have benefitted from the extraordinary knowledge and goodwill of Squadron Leader (Retd) Rana Chhina, the Secretary of the United Service Institution of India’s Centre for Armed Forces Historical Research, who has provided me with records that would otherwise have been beyond my grasp. No research would have been possible without the endless enthusiasm of these professionals. I would like to acknowledge the friendship, support and advice of my colleagues, particularly Dr David Jordan, Dr Gary Sheffield, Dr Chris Tripodi, Dr Tim Moreman, Dr Robert Owen, Clive Richards, Wing Commander (Retd) ‘Jeff’ Jefford and Brigadier Andrew Roe. My greatest thanks go to my supervisor, Dr Peter Gray, and my family. They have all shown the utmost patience and have been the most vital elements of my studies. iv Contents CONTENTS Abstract ii Dedication iii Acknowledgements iv Contents v List of Figures xi List of Abbreviations xii Glossary xiv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1 Literature Review 3 Research Questions 13 Methodology and Structure 15 Sources 18 Chapter 2 Political and Cultural Context 31 Introduction 31 The Importance of India 31 British Grand Strategy 32 NWF Administrative History 35 Topography 41 Cultural Aspects 41 Cross-Cultural Communication 48 British NWF Policy 53 The Close Border Policy – 1838 to 1879 55 The Forward Policy – 1879 to 1901 57 1897 Uprisings 58 The Modified Close Border Policy – 1899 to 1919 59 Modified Forward Policy – 1923-47 61 Anglo-Afghan Relations 68 The Causes of Violence 69 v Contents Chapter 3 RAF Tactics and Doctrine, 1918-1922 74 Introduction 74 The Nature of Doctrine 75 Air Power Doctrine 80 Early RAF Doctrine 82 CD22 – Operations Manual 90 RAF Staff College 99 Conclusion 103 Chapter 4 RAF Tactics and Doctrine, 1922-28 105 Introduction 105 Minor Doctrinal Publications 105 AP1300 - RAF War Manual, 1928 137 Conclusion 147 Chapter 5 RAF Tactics and Doctrine, 1928-39 150 Introduction 150 Minor Doctrinal Publications 150 Combined Frontier Manual 203 Conclusion 210 Chapter 6 A Brief History of the RAF on the NWF 212 Introduction 212 Early Indian Aviation 213 First World War 214 Post-FWW Aviation 216 Third Afghan War 218 Waziristan, 1919-1920 220 Budgetary Issues 221 1922 Salmond Review 223 1922-1924 226 Pink’s War, 1925 227 Mohmand Disturbance, 1927 234 Comparison of Pink’s War and Mohmand Disturbance 235 Kabul Airlift, 1928/29 236 Trenchard’s 1929 ‘Swansong’ 238 1929 Red Shirt-Inspired Incursions 240 Chitral Relief, 1932 247 vi Contents Upper Mohmands Operation, 1933 249 Bajaur Operations, 1933 251 Loe Agra Campaign, 1935 252 Mohmand Campaign, 1935 253 Improving In-Theatre Relations, 1935 256 Waziristan 1936-1939 – The Fakir of Ipi 259 Pre-War Modernisation in Financial Austerity 279 Looming War 292 Conclusion 293 Chapter 7 ‘Control and Constraints’ - Challenges to the Application of Air Power 298 Introduction 298 The Control of Air Power 299 Army vs RAF Decision-Making Speed 303 Inter-Service Hierarchy, Trust and Resentment 304 Army Reluctance to Publicise RAF Exploits 314 Personalities and Relationships 315 Moral Objections to the Use of Air Power 329 Tribal Resentment 335 Public Pressure 337 Diplomatic Pressures 339 Gestation of the Combined Frontier Manual 342 Chapter 8 Implications and Conclusions 351 Implications 351 NWF Influence on Strategic Bombing Policy 351 British Expeditionary Force, 1940 382 Conclusions 383 Annex 1 Definitions 399 Air Blockade 399 Air Control 400 Air Policing 400 Air Substitution 401 Guerrilla Warfare 401 Imperial Policing 401 Insurgency and Counter-Insurgency 402 vii Contents Insurrection, Rebellion and Uprisings 403 Irregular Warfare 403 Proscriptive Air Action 404 Small Wars 405 Subversion 406 Terrorism 407 Annex 2 Weapon Expenditure of Various NWF Operations, Waziristan, 1932-1939 409 Chitral Relief, 1932 - Destructive Phase 409 Chitral Relief, 1932 - Harassment Phase 409 Second Khaisora Operation - December 1936 410 Punitive Destruction of Arsal Kot - 1936/37 410 Wana Column Support - February 1937 411 Third Khaisora Operation - April 1937 411 Punitive Bombing of Bhitanni Villages - June 1937 412 Punitive Bombing of Razin - July 1937 412 Army Co-operation by 3(Indian) Wing - September 1937 413 Madda Khel Punitive Bombing - March 1938 413 Dargai Sar Emergency Air Support - April 1938 414 Madda Khel Punitive Air Proscription - May 1938 414 Punitive Action against Madda Khel Villages - August 1938 415 Punitive Destruction of Tamora - January 1939 415 Punitive Air Proscription of Karesta Algad - January to June 1939 416 Madda Khel Air Blockade - February to April 1939 417 Tori Khel Punitive Air Proscription - October 38 to May 39 417 Razmak Road Proscription - July 1939 418 Proscription of Fakir of Ipi at Kharre - August 1939 418 Proscription of Fakir of Ipi at Kharre - September 1939 419 Annex 3 Transcript from ‘Birds of Prey’ TV Documentary - NWF Excerpts 420 Annex 4 RAF Staff College Pre-Course Reading List, 1933 422 Annex 5 RAF Staff College Small Wars Syllabus, 1922-1938 423 Annex 6 Classification of Targets - AP1300 430 viii Contents Annex 7 Key Personality Biographies 431 Bottomley, Air Chief Marshal Sir Norman 431 Burt-Andrews, Air Commodore C B E 432 Capel, Air Vice-Marshal A J 433 Chamier, Air Commodore Sir John 434 Champion de Crespigny, Air Vice-Marshal Hugh 435 Darvall, Air Marshal Sir Lawrence ‘Johnny’ 436 Ellington, Marshal of the RAF Sir Edward 437 Embry, Air Chief Marshal Sir Basil 438 Game, Air Vice-Marshal Sir Philip 439 Harris, Marshal of the RAF Sir Arthur 440 Joubert de la Ferte,
Recommended publications
  • Issue 104 – July 2020
    THE TIGER Homes for heroes by the sea . THE NEWSLETTER OF THE LEICESTERSHIRE & RUTLAND BRANCH OF THE WESTERN FRONT ASSOCIATION ISSUE 104 – JULY 2020 CHAIRMAN’S COLUMN Welcome again, Ladies and Gentlemen, to The Tiger. Whilst the first stage of the easing of the “lockdown” still prevent us from re-uniting at Branch Meetings, there is still a certain amount of good news emanating from the “War Front”. In Ypres, from 1st July, members of the public will be permitted to attend the Last Post Ceremony, although numbers will be limited to 152, with social distancing of 1.5 metres observed. 1st July will also see the re-opening of Talbot House in Poperinghe. Readers will be pleased to learn that the recent fund-raising appeal for the House, featured in this very column in the May edition of The Tiger reached its required target and my thanks go to those of you who donated to this worthy cause. Another piece of news has, as yet, received scant publicity but could prove to be the most important of all. In the aftermath of the recent “attack” on the Cenotaph, during which an attempt was made to set alight our national flag, I was delighted to read in the Press that: a Desecration of War Memorials Bill, carrying a ten year prison sentence, would be brought before the Commons as a matter of urgency. The subsequent discovery that ten years was the maximum sentence rather than the minimum tempered my joy somewhat, but the fact that War Memorials are now finally to be legally placed on a higher plane than other statuary is, at least in my opinion, a major step forward in their protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1: Sir Frederick Sykes the First Display in the Gallery Contains
    Case 1: Sir Frederick Sykes The first display in the gallery contains the awards relating to Major General Sir Frederick Sykes, the first Chief of the Air Staff, and future son-in-law of Andrew Bonnar Law, the British Prime Minister. The awards include the badges and stars of three orders which Sykes joined in connection with his services in command of the Royal Flying Corps and later the Royal Air Force, with the badge of a CMG, the badge and star of a military division KCB, and the sash badge and star of a military division GBE. Sir Frederick was appointed a Companion in the Order of St Michael and St George on 1 January 1916, while serving as a Wing Captain in the Royal Naval Air Service, for services with the Eastern Mediterranean Squadron between the time of the landing in the Gallipoli peninsula in April 1915 and the evacuation at the end of the year. At this stage the insignia of a CMG was worn on the breast rather than around the neck, but Sir Frederick’s badge was converted for neck wear following the introduction of new rules which permitted the CMGs to wear their badge in that way. Three years after being nominated a CMG, and only a few weeks after the Armistice, Sykes was appointed a KCB, without having first received the CB, which was the more usual means of entry into the ranks of the Order of the Bath. At the same time that Sir Frederick received his KCB, the Bath welcomed two more RAF officers who were destined to reach high rank and to succeed Sykes as Chief of the Air Staff: Major General John Salmond was granted a KCB, while Edward Ellington received his CB.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by John Michael Meyer 2020
    Copyright by John Michael Meyer 2020 The Dissertation Committee for John Michael Meyer Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Dissertation. One Way to Live: Orde Wingate and the Adoption of ‘Special Forces’ Tactics and Strategies (1903-1944) Committee: Ami Pedahzur, Supervisor Zoltan D. Barany David M. Buss William Roger Louis Thomas G. Palaima Paul B. Woodruff One Way to Live: Orde Wingate and the Adoption of ‘Special Forces’ Tactics and Strategies (1903-1944) by John Michael Meyer Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2020 Dedication To Ami Pedahzur and Wm. Roger Louis who guided me on this endeavor from start to finish and To Lorna Paterson Wingate Smith. Acknowledgements Ami Pedahzur and Wm. Roger Louis have helped me immeasurably throughout my time at the University of Texas, and I wish that everyone could benefit from teachers so rigorous and open minded. I will never forget the compassion and strength that they demonstrated over the course of this project. Zoltan Barany developed my skills as a teacher, and provided a thoughtful reading of my first peer-reviewed article. David M. Buss kept an open mind when I approached him about this interdisciplinary project, and has remained a model of patience while I worked towards its completion. My work with Tom Palaima and Paul Woodruff began with collaboration, and then moved to friendship. Inevitably, I became their student, though they had been teaching me all along.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffp2facts May06
    STAFF CADET PART II FACT SHEET HQ Kent Wing Air Training Corps Yeomanry Cottages, Boxley Road, Maidstone, Kent ME14 2AR Officer Commanding Wing Commander A. Atkins RAFVR(T) Wing Administrative Officer Squadron Leader R. Bushby RAFR (Including co-ordination of Camps and AEF) Wing Hon Chairman Squadron Leader R. E. Fawkes RAFVR(T) (Retd) Wing Chaplain Reverend D. Barnes Squadrons: 36 Staff Numbers: Officers: 63; Adult SNCOs: 68; Civilian Instructors 146 (correct at 20-Mar-06) Number of Cadets: 1115 enrolled and probationers (correct at 30-Sep-05) Wing Staff and Duties (as at 01-Jan-05) Post Duties WSO1 Squadron Leader V. R. Beaney RAFVR(T) Deputy Adventure Training Technical Officer, BELA Course Director, Duke of Edinburgh’s Award & Area 1 Staff Officer WSO2 Squadron Leader C. Hatton RAFVR(T) Gliding Liaison, Health and Safety, Airshows, Aircraft Recognition, Aeromodelling, AWO/Adult SNCO Liaison & Area 2 Staff Officer WSO3 Squadron Leader B. J. Fitzpatrick RAFVR(T) Classification and Syllabus Training (inc. BTECs), Pre-Adult and Adult Training Courses, Marconi-Elliott and Clarke Competitions, Bands & Area 3 Staff Officer WSO4 Squadron Leader R. C. Goodayle RAFVR(T) Deputy OC Wing, Adventure Training Technical Officer, Green Camps and ACF Liaison, PMC, Pentathlon & Area 4 Staff Officer WSO5 Flight Lieutenant D. C. Horsley RAFVR(T) Corporate Communications, Radio Communications, Flying Development and Flying Opportunities, Work Experience and Station Visits, Elworthy Trophy & Special Projects WSO6 Squadron Leader P. Atkins RAFVR(T) Cadet NCO Training Courses, Adult and Cadet First Aid Training, Techniques of Instruction, Nijmegen, Overseas Visits & Sun’n’Fun WWO AWO H. Hollamby Area Warrant Officers Wing Duties Performed by Squadron Staff Shooting Flight Lieutenant M.
    [Show full text]
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • A M D G Beaumont Union Review Summer 2020
    A M D G BEAUMONT UNION REVIEW SUMMER 2020 "And I said to the man who stood at the gate of the year: ―Give me a light that I may tread safely into the unknown.‖ Well, we didn‘t see this one coming. Having written in the last REVIEW about ―a year like no other‖ which concludes in this Edition, no one thought we would be living through another. Over 90% of the BU have been confined and we have seen the cancellation of The HCPT and BOFs Pilgrimage to Lourdes, The Verdun Battlefield Tour, The BUGS Meeting at Westerham and Ant Stevens much anticipated Musical ―Streetwise‖: Now rescheduled for 24-29 May 2021. Much quoted at the moment ―We will meet again, Don‘t know where, Don‘t know when but I know we will meet again some sunny day: - Actually it looks like a cloudy day in the Autumn if we are lucky! I was amazed by the response to my Easter Message: I don‘t know whether it could be described as an ―Urbi et Orbi‖ moment but it did bring a huge response from OBs worldwide. One such from Patrick Agnew which I share with you:- ―Indeed. We have taken a lot for granted, during our years; much to be grateful for. Humanity is vulnerable to many things, some much worse than seen now. Globalization has it‘s many drawbacks, as well. Our precious little planet, in such perfect evolved balance, for so many eons, is also threatened by the economic ―progress‖ of mankind, whose numbers compound upwards and ravage resources, and are poisoning them.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchill, Wavell and Greece, 1941*
    Robin Higham Duty, Honor and Grand Strategy: Churchill, Wavell and Greece, 1941* In our previous works, then Capt. Harold E. Raugh and I took too limited a Mediterranean view of the background of the Greek campaign of 6-26 April 19411. Far from its being Raugh’s “disastrous mistake,” I argue that General Sir Archibald Wavell’s actions fitted both traditional British practice and the general policy worked out in London. In 1986 and 1987 I argued after long and careful thought since 1967 that Wavell went to Greece as part of a loyal deception of Prime Minister Winston Churchill, whose bellicose way at war was the antithesis of Wavell’s own professionalism. Further, whereas Raugh took the narrow military view, mine was a grand-strategic approach relating ends to means. My argument here is that a restudy of the campaign in Greece of 6-27 April 1941 utilizing the Orange Leonard ULTRA messages reconfirms my thesis that going to Greece was a deception and that far from being the miserable defeat which Raugh imagined, the withdrawal was a strategic triumph in the manner of a Wellington in Spain and Portugal or of the BEF’s in France in 1940. For this Wavell deserves full credit. In this respect, then, the so-called campaign in Greece must be seen not as an ignominious retreat in the face of superior forces, but rather as a skilful, carefully planned withdrawal and ultimate evacuation. It was a successful, though materially costly, gamble. * This paper was accepted for publication in late 2005 but delayed by the Balkan Studies financial crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhodesian Crisis in British and International Politics, 1964
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository THE RHODESIAN CRISIS IN BRITISH AND INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 1964-1965 by CARL PETER WATTS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Historical Studies The University of Birmingham April 2006 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis uses evidence from British and international archives to examine the events leading up to Rhodesia’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) on 11 November 1965 from the perspectives of Britain, the Old Commonwealth (Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), and the United States. Two underlying themes run throughout the thesis. First, it argues that although the problem of Rhodesian independence was highly complex, a UDI was by no means inevitable. There were courses of action that were dismissed or remained under explored (especially in Britain, but also in the Old Commonwealth, and the United States), which could have been pursued further and may have prevented a UDI.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENT to the LONDON GAZETTE, 14 AUGUST, 1946 4097 Shortly Afterwards Our Troops Took Possession Eamichliye to a Point Where the Road Mosul- of the Town
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 14 AUGUST, 1946 4097 shortly afterwards our troops took possession Eamichliye to a point where the road Mosul- of the town. The railway and all railway in- Deir-ez-Zor crosses the Iraq-Syria frontier. .stallations up to the Turkish frontier had -been (iii) Lt. General Quinan was to submit captured intact as well as several bridges which his plans for holding the Northern Frontier had .been prepared for demolition. of Iraq against hostile advance through On 8th July, a column was sent to capture Anatolia or Iran. The construction of per- Hassetche, the seat of the local Government, manent defences in this area was to be con- in the Bee du Canard. Here the French de- fined to denying, where possible, the main cided not to fight and the town and fort were • lines of approach by armoured fighting occupied without opposition. vehicles into Iraq from Turkey or Iran with On gth July Ras el Ain was found to be the object of slowing up an advance and clear of French troops. Lack of motor trans- forcing it into unsuitable country. Plans in port made furtiher advance impossible. 5th detail were also to be prepared for an ad- Battalion I3th Frontier Force Rifles therefore vance into Turkish or Iranian territory in remained in occupation of the Bee du Canard order to seize defiles suitable for delaying covering the railway and the remainder of the action and to carry out extensive demoli- column returned to Mosul on I4th July. tions. 26. On return, of the Headquarters of I7th (iv) A suitable force was to be held in Indian Infantry Brigade to Mosul, the Head- readiness to enable the occupation of quarters of the aoth Indian Infantry Brigade Abadan and Naft-i-Shah to be carried out at moved to Baghdad, being better placed there short notice.
    [Show full text]
  • British 8Th Infantry Division on the Western Front, 1914-1918
    Centre for First World War Studies British 8th Infantry Division on the Western Front, 1914-18 by Alun Miles THOMAS Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law January 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Recent years have seen an increasingly sophisticated debate take place with regard to the armies on the Western Front during the Great War. Some argue that the British and Imperial armies underwent a ‘learning curve’ coupled with an increasingly lavish supply of munitions, which meant that during the last three months of fighting the BEF was able to defeat the German Army as its ability to conduct operations was faster than the enemy’s ability to react. This thesis argues that 8th Division, a war-raised formation made up of units recalled from overseas, became a much more effective and sophisticated organisation by the war’s end. It further argues that the formation did not use one solution to problems but adopted a sophisticated approach dependent on the tactical situation.
    [Show full text]