DOCSLIB.ORG

Combined Response March 19, 2020 St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Combined Response March 19, 2020 St. Joseph, Patron of the Universal Church, pray for us! Greetings my friends, Praised be Jesus, Mary, and St. Joseph now and forever. Rather than give the names of some friends who wrote me emails and asked me to correspond with them and answer questions, in this letter on the public website I am only going to refer to them as F1 (as one friend), F2 (as another friend), F3 (as another friend), F4 (as another friend). F1 sent me an email March 5, 2020 and asked “What do you think of the following”; and then he sent information that was mostly taken from the CMRI website. Correspondence went back and forth for a while, and although I have other daily duties to also be taken care of, I will herein provide some information – although it will not be the complete in depth answers to explain about all of the articles accessed from the hyperlinks F1 sent me. Not long after F1 and I exchanged a few emails, another correspondence through email took place with F2. In the meantime, while I have been writing this letter, F3 also sent me an email asking me to comment on information from F4’s website. Because the subject matter for all of these email correspondences are closely related and intertwined; I have decided to see if I can address all of them in this one Combined Response to the questions asked in the emails. One of the articles F1 wanted to know what I think about was: Traditional Priests, Legitimate Sacraments by Rev. Anthony Cekada. Therefore, let us start with Traditional Priests, Legitimate Sacraments by Rev. Anthony Cekada as found on the CMRI website with the statement, “Reprinted by permission of Rev. Anthony Cekada.” In Traditional Priests, Legitimate Sacraments Rev. Anthony Cekada wrote: “In the case of legitimate deputation for confession, divine law requires that for valid absolution of sinners, a priest must also possess the power of jurisdiction in addition to the power of Holy Orders. No traditional Catholic priest I know of disputes this. … Abps. Lefebvre and Thuc — were obliged to confer Holy Orders on worthy candidates who would then continue to provide sacraments for faithful Catholics throughout the world. … Moreover, those of us who derive our orders from Abps. Lefebvre or Thuc obviously have no appointment to the cura animarum (care of souls).” Please send me your answers to all of the questions with numbers between these kinds of brackets {}. {1} Do you agree that in other words, Rev. Anthony Cekada is clearly explaining that every traditional Catholic priest and bishop teaches that every priest and bishop must also possess the power of jurisdiction for the valid absolution of sinners; and because they do not have the cura animarum (care of souls), none of them possess ordinary jurisdiction? Let us recall some other very important truths. I quote from page five of Rev. Anthony Cekada's article, The Validity of the Thuc Consecrations: “Since no one in the Traditional Movement possesses ordinary jurisdiction, no one has the power to rule on the legal evidence that a particular sacrament was performed and then establish it as a fact before Church law.” Rev. Cekada's article has been widely circulated and read by many people in the Traditional Movement. You can still find it on the World Wide Web. Therefore, it cannot be denied that many people know the truth that: “No one in the Traditional Movement possesses ordinary jurisdiction”! There is an article in the Angelus Press, 1997, page 54, titled: Most Asked Questions about the Society of Saint Pius X. The quote can now also be found on the World Wide Web. For over 23 years now, those who read this article know that those in The Society of Saint Pius X do not have jurisdiction: “Only the Pope, who has universal jurisdiction over the whole Church, can appoint a pastor to a flock and empower him to govern it. But Archbishop Lefebvre never presumed to confer anything but the full priestly powers of Orders, and in no way did he grant any jurisdiction (which he himself did not have personally to give).” 1 Next, we recall that Archbishop Lefebvre publicly, freely, and truthfully told the world at the time he consecrated the four bishops that they would not be ordinaries. That is to say, they would not have ordinary jurisdiction. If bishops do not possess ordinary jurisdiction, they will never delegate jurisdiction to priests because they cannot give what they do not have. Consequently, we learn from their own writings that no traditional Catholic priest disputes that he needs jurisdiction for the valid absolution of sinners, and none of them have ordinary jurisdiction. Furthermore, I do not know any of the Traditionalist Movement bishops that claim they receive their Power of Orders from the Bishop Thuc lineage that also claim they receive delegated jurisdiction from a pope. If a bishop does not have delegated jurisdiction from the Pope, he cannot delegate jurisdiction to any priest; because you cannot give what you do not have. Apparently the Traditional Priests, Legitimate Sacraments article by Rev. Anthony Cekada was written to bring about his conclusion that states a brand-new doctrine unheard of before in the Catholic Church, namely: “The jurisdiction we traditional Catholic priests possess has been delegated to us from Christ Himself.” {2} Do you agree therefore that according to their own writings and statements; the Traditionalist Movement bishops do not delegate any jurisdiction to the Traditionalist Movement priests? {3} Do you agree that Traditionalistist Movement bishops coming from Bishop Thuc and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre also teach that they did not receive any jurisdiction from a Catholic Pope? {4} Do you agree that according to their own writings and statements, each Traditionalist Movement bishop and each Traditionalist Movement priest receives any jurisdiction he possesses as delegated DIRECTLY to him from Christ Himself? {5} Do you agree that in the Traditional Priests, Legitimate Sacraments article; Rev. Anthony Cekada did not provide a single quote from sacred Scripture, a Pope, Council of the Church, Father of the Church, Doctor of the Catholic Church, or even a canonized Saint that teaches the same thing as Rev. Anthony Cekada and the Traditionalist Movement clerics; namely, “The jurisdiction we traditional Catholic priests possess has been delegated to us from Christ Himself”? {6} Do you agree that in his article Traditional Priests, Legitimate Sacraments Rev. Anthony Cekada neglects to address that contrary to his conclusion, the teachings of the Catholic Church clearly provide the Catholic doctrine that all jurisdiction comes to the bishops through the successor of St. Peter; and not delegated to bishops or priests directly from Christ Himself? Bishop Sanborn said the following during his video when he was talking to people in London in 2013: Why is this so? Because the authority of the Church is the authority of Christ. Pope Pius XII said it in Mystici Corporis; that the authority, the power of the Pope is the same as the authority of Christ. There are not two heads in the sense of two different authorities. There is the invisible head, Christ, and the visible head, the Pope. The Pope is the Vicar of Christ; they both have the same authority. So the authority of the Pope is the same as the authority of Christ. {7} Do you agree that the statements of Bishop Sanborn, “the power of the Pope is the same as the authority of Christ” and “the authority of the Pope is the same as the authority of Christ”, are the correct teaching according to Catholic doctrine? The following is a partial transcript of some of the things stated by Bishop Pivarunas during a YouTube movie concerning Sedevacantism – starting at about 15 minutes and 20 seconds into the video: You know the issue is; this is for me the absolute bottom line. Christ said to His Apostles: “He who hears you hears me. Whatever you bind on earth is bound in heaven; whatever you loose on earth is loosed in heaven. Teach all nations everything I have commanded. I am with you all days. I will send the Advocate, the Spirit of Truth who will teach you all things and abide with you forever. He who does not believe what you teach will be condemned.” Christ founded a teaching Church, that teaching Church is infallible. And if we look at Vatican I, which 2 reiterated, right out of the Vatican, we are talking about this quote right here. Vatican I says very clearly: “For the Fathers of the Fourth Council of Constantinople, following closely the footsteps of their predecessors made the solemn profession: The first condition of salvation is to keep the norm of the true faith. For it is impossible that the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, where He says, ‘thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build My Church,’ should not be verified. And the truth has been proved by the course of history. In the Apostolic See the Catholic Religion has always been kept unsullied and its teachings kept holy.” ALWAYS! Can we say that now of these modern so-called popes? Absolutely, positively not! And right here on the second page: “Indeed, it was this Apostolic doctrine that all the Fathers held, and all the Orthodox Fathers and Doctors reverenced and followed. For they fully realize that this See of St. Peter always remains untainted by any error. According to the divine promise our Lord and Savior made to the Prince of His disciples: “I have prayed for thee Peter, I have prayed for thee that thy faith fail not; and do thou once confirm, strengthen thy brethren.” Now this Charism of truth and never failing faith was conferred upon St.
Recommended publications
  • Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses

    Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses

    Dedicated to Patrick Henry Omlor The Grain of Incense: Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses — Rev. Anthony Cekada — www.traditionalmass.org Should we assist at traditional Masses offered “together with Thy servant Benedict, our Pope”? articulate any theological reasons or arguments for “Do not allow your tongue to give utterance to what your heart knows is not true.… To say Amen is to what he does. subscribe to the truth.” He has read or heard the stories of countless early — St. Augustine, on the Canon martyrs who chose horrible deaths, rather than offer even one grain of incense in tribute to the false, ecu- “Our charity is untruthful because it is not severe; menical religion of the Roman emperor. So better to and it is unpersuasive, because it is not truthful… Where there is no hatred of heresy, there is no holi- avoid altogether the Masses of priests who, through ness.” the una cum, offer a grain of incense to the heresiarch — Father Faber, The Precious Blood Ratzinger and his false ecumenical religion… In many parts of the world, however, the only tra- IN OUR LIVES as traditional Catholics, we make many ditional Latin Mass available may be one offered by a judgments that must inevitably produce logical conse- priest (Motu, SSPX or independent) who puts the false quences in our actual religious practice. The earliest pope’s name in the Canon. Faced with choosing this or that I remember making occurred at about age 14. Gui- nothing, a sedevacantist is then sometimes tempted to tar songs at Mass, I concluded, were irreverent.
  • Le Rocher N°

    Le Rocher N°

    c’est le christ LE Rocher Bulletin romand du District de Suisse No 129 février - mars 2021 éDitorial Sommaire La crise du coronavi- PARTIE OFFICIELLE rus dure depuis un an . Lettre du Supérieur de district . 3 LA PAROLE DE MGR LEFEBVRE Si les gouvernements Nous ne trouvons plus la charité de N .-S . Jésus- s’emploient à atténuer Christ dans nos sociétés . 7 les conséquences économiques de la VIE DE DE L’ÉGLISE crise, nous subissons de notre côté Une année dédiée à saint Joseph . 11 les mesures de lutte contre la propa- Des évêques républicains face à la loi qui a gation du virus . dépénalisé l’avortement . 13 Sur le plan spirituel et de manière SOCIÉTÉ Les religions face aux épidémies . 17 plus générale, il est intéressant de Referendum contre le “mariage pour tous” . 22 noter comment les religions ont VIE DE LA TRADITION réagi aux épidémies, de la peste à la Action de carême 2021 . .. 25 Covid-19 . (cf . p . 17) . L’école “Saint-François-de-Sales” . 27 Du côté de nos communautés, la Journal de route du district . 31 crise a manifesté quelques fragilités . Il PETITE REVUE DE PRESSE Nouvelles de Suisse et d’ailleurs . 35 faut les regarder en face, rester ancrés UNE PAGE D’HISTOIRE DE L’ÉGLISE dans l’essentiel et ne pas nous diviser Saint Pierre Canisius . 39 pour des question annexes (cf . p . 3) . TÉLÉGRILLES Nous vivons dans une société qui Découvrez un auteur et son livre . 48 a accepté l’avortement (cf . p . 13), qui VIE SPIRITUELLE s'acharne à vouloir changer le sens du Les retraites en Suisse romande .
  • A Pope of Their Own

    A Pope of Their Own

    Magnus Lundberg A Pope of their Own El Palmar de Troya and the Palmarian Church UPPSALA STUDIES IN CHURCH HISTORY 1 About the series Uppsala Studies in Church History is a series that is published in the Department of Theology, Uppsala University. The series includes works in both English and Swedish. The volumes are available open-access and only published in digital form. For a list of available titles, see end of the book. About the author Magnus Lundberg is Professor of Church and Mission Studies and Acting Professor of Church History at Uppsala University. He specializes in early modern and modern church and mission history with focus on colonial Latin America. Among his monographs are Mission and Ecstasy: Contemplative Women and Salvation in Colonial Spanish America and the Philippines (2015) and Church Life between the Metropolitan and the Local: Parishes, Parishioners and Parish Priests in Seventeenth-Century Mexico (2011). Personal web site: www.magnuslundberg.net Uppsala Studies in Church History 1 Magnus Lundberg A Pope of their Own El Palmar de Troya and the Palmarian Church Lundberg, Magnus. A Pope of Their Own: Palmar de Troya and the Palmarian Church. Uppsala Studies in Church History 1.Uppsala: Uppsala University, Department of Theology, 2017. ISBN 978-91-984129-0-1 Editor’s address: Uppsala University, Department of Theology, Church History, Box 511, SE-751 20 UPPSALA, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]. Contents Preface 1 1. Introduction 11 The Religio-Political Context 12 Early Apparitions at El Palmar de Troya 15 Clemente Domínguez and Manuel Alonso 19 2.
  • Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and The

    Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and The

    Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and the Limits of Control in the Information Age Jan W Geisbusch University College London Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Anthropology. 15 September 2008 UMI Number: U591518 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591518 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration of authorship: I, Jan W Geisbusch, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature: London, 15.09.2008 Acknowledgments A thesis involving several years of research will always be indebted to the input and advise of numerous people, not all of whom the author will be able to recall. However, my thanks must go, firstly, to my supervisor, Prof Michael Rowlands, who patiently and smoothly steered the thesis round a fair few cliffs, and, secondly, to my informants in Rome and on the Internet. Research was made possible by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
  • Fatima and the Third Secret

    Fatima and the Third Secret

    Fatima and the Third Secret A Historical Examination based on a Letter of Sister Lúcia and the Carmelite Biography Second Edition Revised & Enlarged Why Was the Third Secret of Fatima Not Released in 1960? An Interview with Antonio Augusto Borelli Machado Preserving Christian Publications Boonville, New York 2017 Preserving Christian Publications P.O. Box 221 Boonville, New York 13309 Tel: 315-942-6617 [email protected] www.pcpbooks.net © 2016-2017 Preserving Christian Publications, Inc. Contents I. A Serious Error Regarding Fatima 3 II. A Controversial Letter of Sister Lúcia 14 III. The Mission of Sister Lúcia 19 IV. Our Lady of Fatima and Russia – Part I 25 V. Our Lady of Fatima and Russia – Part II 31 VI. Our Lady of Fatima and Russia – Part III 37 Appendix: Why Was the Third Secret of Fatima Not Released in 1960? – An Interview with Antonio Augusto Borelli Machado 43 1 2 A Serious Error Regarding Fatima Introduction: The Debate about the Third Secret The death in 2015 of Father Nicholas Gruner, known to many as “the Fatima Priest,” coincided with the publication in the United States of the Carmelite biography of Sister Lúcia of Fatima. What the timing of these two events means in the plan of Divine Providence may be unknown, but developments since then show that Fatima remains uppermost in the minds of many Catholics throughout the world. Shortly after the English edition of the biography appeared, for example, attorney Christopher Ferrara criticized a passage in the translation involving words of Our Lady, and he interpreted the mistranslated passage as a deliberate attempt to alter the facts relating to the Third Secret.
  • The Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (N°27, Autumn 2015)

    The Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (N°27, Autumn 2015)

    Dowry – Catholic periodical by the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (N°27, Autumn 2015) Dowry(N°27, Autumn 2015) “O Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and our most gracious Queen and Mother, look down in mercy upon England thy Dowry.”(Cardinal Wiseman) (Picture: A priest from our Fraternity blesses a family home at our parish in Umuaka, Imo State, in Nigeria. In response to Pope Francis’ appeal for prayers to be offered during the Synod on the Family in Rome, the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St Peter will add a special prayer to that intention at Holy Masses offered from 4 to 25 October.) In this issue: Editorial: Stepping Stones A gentle switch to sixth gear The Most Holy Eucharist as Judgment Voices from Versailles I am Margaret: fiction or reality? She walked for life Boys’ Summer Camp in the New Forest Fifteen more workers to the Vineyard Year of Mercy Retreats Past & Forthcoming events Support our seminarians & our apostolate 1 Dowry – Catholic periodical by the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (N°27, Autumn 2015) Editorial: Stepping stones ear Friends, we are pleased to share with you the good remember that you can revisit our history with news of the forthcoming expansion of the Priestly many more details and pictures via the online D Fraternity of St Peter in Our Lady’s Dowry. At the series of Dowry magazines beginning of the Summer, after a meeting with Archbishop (www.lms.org.uk/news-and-events/fssp- Malcolm McMahon, O.P., of Liverpool, His Grace issued the magazine).
  • Jews, Radical Catholic Traditionalists, and the Extreme Right

    Jews, Radical Catholic Traditionalists, and the Extreme Right

    “Artisans … for Antichrist”: Jews, Radical Catholic Traditionalists, and the Extreme Right Mark Weitzman* The Israeli historian, Israel J. Yuval, recently wrote: The Christian-Jewish debate that started nineteen hundred years ago, in our day came to a conciliatory close. … In one fell swoop, the anti-Jewish position of Christianity became reprehensible and illegitimate. … Ours is thus the first generation of scholars that can and may discuss the Christian-Jewish debate from a certain remove … a post- polemical age.1 This appraisal helped spur Yuval to write his recent controversial book Two Nations in Your Womb: Perceptions of Jews and Christians in late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Yuval based his optimistic assessment on the strength of the reforms in Catholicism that stemmed from the adoption by the Second Vatican Council in 1965 of the document known as Nostra Aetate. Nostra Aetate in Michael Phayer’s words, was the “revolution- ary” document that signified “the Catholic church’s reversal of its 2,000 year tradition of antisemitism.”2 Yet recent events in the relationship between Catholics and Jews could well cause one to wonder about the optimism inherent in Yuval’s pronouncement. For, while the established Catholic Church is still officially committed to the teachings of Nostra Aetate, the opponents of that document and of “modernity” in general have continued their fight and appear to have gained, if not a foothold, at least a hearing in the Vatican today. And, since in the view of these radical Catholic traditionalists “[i]nternational Judaism wants to radically defeat Christianity and to be its substitute” using tools like the Free- * Director of Government Affairs, Simon Wiesenthal Center.
  • PDF Fatima Conference Flyer

    PDF Fatima Conference Flyer

    PAID Nonprofit Permit 41 Permit US Postage US Postage Spokane, WA Spokane, Annual Fatima Conference October 6-10, 2021 A gathering of Traditional Catholics from around the country for five days of Latin Masses, spiritual exercises, inspiring lectures and sermons, in the beautiful Pacific Northwest. Sponsored by the Religious Congregation Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen Mary Immaculate Queen Center Rd. 8504 N St. Michael’s 99217-9333 Spokane, WA of Mary Immaculate Queen REQUESTED ELECTRONIC SERVICE Mount St. Michael Annual Fatima Conference Join us in honoring Our Lady during the 8504 N. St. Michael’s Rd. Spokane, WA 99217-9333 Most Rev. Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI: His Excellency, Rev. Father Francisco Radecki, CMRI: Along with his Bishop Pivarunas, was or- Fatima Conference 2021 twin brother, Fr. Francisco was dained in 1985 and, six years ordained by Bishop Robert later, raised to the episcopacy Speakers McKenna in 1988. Father is by the late Bishop Moises pastor of St. Joseph’s Church Carmona. Bishop Pivarunas Theme: in Detroit, Michigan. He has is the superior general of the “The Servant of Mary will never perish” authored two Latin primers, Congregation of Mary Im- two catechisms, and has co- maculate Queen, pastor of authored with Fr. Dominic Mary Immaculate Church Please note details about the speakers will be Radecki three books on Vatican in Omaha, rector of Mater added over in the months ahead. II and its aftermath, which Dei Seminary, and principal have benefited numerous souls of Mater Dei Academy. His seeking answers to the dilemmas of our day. Excellency also founded the Congregation of Sisters of Confraternity.
  • The Holy Father's Motu Proprio on the “Old” Mass: What Does It Mean For

    The Holy Father's Motu Proprio on the “Old” Mass: What Does It Mean For

    The Holy Father’s Motu Proprio On the “Old” Mass: recover and restore the fullness of our authentic Catholic tradition in our worship, because only in doing so can we remain fully grounded in the What Does It Mean for Us? Faith as it has come down to us from the Apostles. by Fr. Robert Johansen What should I do about this? On July 7, Pope Benedict XVI promulgated an Apostolic Letter Well, firstly, if you’re not familiar with the Extraordinary form of the Motu Proprio, titled “Summorum Pontificum”, in which he greatly Mass, or with our Latin tradition, take a little time to start getting broadened the circumstances under which the “Old” Mass, that is, the familiar with them. Without doubt, many articles, workshops, and “pre-Vatican II” Mass, could be celebrated. A Motu Proprio is a letter conferences about these things will be forthcoming. Take advantage of issued by the Holy Father “on his own initiative” for the good of the the opportunity to read the articles and attend some of the workshops. whole Church, and has the force of both legislation and teaching. This The more you understand our Catholic Faith the more fully you can live document promises to be of great importance to the lives of all Catholics, it! not only for its provisions for the celebration of the Classical Roman Second, be patient! It will take some time to work out how this will be Rite, but for the understanding of the Church’s liturgy that it advances. implemented and lived out in every diocese and parish.
  • Marcin Karas INTEGRYZM BRACTWA KAPŁAŃSKIEGO ŚW. PIUSA X

    Marcin Karas INTEGRYZM BRACTWA KAPŁAŃSKIEGO ŚW. PIUSA X

    INTEGRYZM BRACTWA KAPŁAŃSKIEGO ŚW. PIUSA X <8> SOCIETAS seria pod redakcją BOGDANA SZLACHTY 9 Marcin Karas INTEGRYZM BRACTWA KAPŁAŃSKIEGO ŚW. PIUSA X HISTORIA I DOKTRYNA RZYMSKOKATOLICKIEGO RUCHU TRADYCJONALISTYCZNEGO [tl AKADEMICKA Kraków 2008 Copyright by Marcin Karas, Kraków 2008 Recenzenci: prof, dr hab. Stanisław Obirek prof, dr hab. Jan Skoczyński Redakcja: Marta Stęplewska Korekta: Agnieszka Kutylak-Hapanowicz Projekt okładki: Paweł Sepielak Skład i łamanie: Małgorzata Manterys Na okładce wykorzystano zdjęcie przedstawiające abpa, Marcela Lefebvre’a głoszącego kazanie podczas obchodów 20-tej rocznicy powstania Bractwa Kapłańskiego św. Piusa X, dn. 29 kwietnia 1990 r., w Hali Międzynarodowych Targów nad Jeziorem Bodeńskim (Internationale Bodenseemesse - IBO) w Friedrichshafen, Badenia-Wirtembergia, Niemcy. Książka dofinansowana przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego ISBN 978-83-7188-067-4 KSIĘGARNIA AKADEMICKA ul. św. Anny 6, 31-008 Kraków tel. /faks: 012 431-27-43, 012 663-11-67 e-mail: akademicka@akademicka. pl Księgarnia internetowa: www. akademicka. pl Spis treści: Wprowadzenie................................................................................................................................... 7 I. Historia ruchu integrystycznego................................................................................................9 1. Przemiany w Kościele w drugiej połowie XX w. ..................................................................9 2. Historia Bractwa Kapłańskiego św. Piusa X.........................................................................10
  • January 2009 the Real Reason for the Society's Stand the State Of

    January 2009 the Real Reason for the Society's Stand the State Of

    THE ANGELUS ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTICLE REPRINT Let your speech be “Yes, yes: no, no”; whatever is beyond these comes from the evil one. (Mt. 5:37) January 2009 Reprint #84 THE STATE OF NECEssITY In a letter dated July 8, 1987, Archbishop Lefebvre Rome’s extended hand, and, following its founder, the wrote to Cardinal Ratzinger: “The permanent will to Society of St. Pius X always remains ready to respond annihilate Tradition is a suicidal will, which justifies, favorably to the opportunity of these discussions with by its very existence, true and faithful Catholics when the authorities of the hierarchy. But these contacts have they make the decisions necessary for the survival of only one goal: to let the pure and integral voice of the Church and the salvation of souls.”1 In his homily Catholic Tradition be heard in Rome so that it might on the day of the episcopal consecrations of June 30, recover its rights in the whole Church. The discussions 1988, the Archbishop returned to this rule, from which will be in vain for as long as Rome maintains in he deduced the legitimacy of his actions. “Thus,” he principle the corrupted teachings of the Second Vatican explained, “we find ourselves in a case of necessity.... Council. This is why we are convinced that, by the act of these Things stand thus because the liturgical and consecrations today, we are obeying...the call of God.”2 doctrinal Tradition reigning prior to Vatican II is not just one form of Catholic expression among others in The Real Reason the Church.
  • Michael Davies an Evaluation

    Michael Davies an Evaluation

    MICHAEL DAVIES AN EVALUATION CLICK HERE TO BUY A HARD COPY OF THIS BOOK “To the best of my knowledge, no one has been able to point out a theologi- cal error in any of my books.” (Michael Davies, The Angelus , March 1984) “All my writing is governed by one criterion only, the truth.” (Michael Davies, The Remnant , 30 th November 1988) “I have now written four books, fourteen pamphlets, and countless articles, exposing the deficiencies of the post-Vatican II liturgical revolution. No one has, as yet, been able to point out any factual or doctrinal error in any of them.” (Michael Davies, The Remnant , 15th May 1989) MICHAEL DAVIES AN EVALUATION NEW EDITION JOHN S. DALY First edition 1989 This edition © copyright John S. Daly 2015 ISBN 978-2-917813-51-5 TRADIBOOKS ROUCHAS SUD 47180 SAINT -SAUVEUR DE MEILHAN , FRANCE http://www.tradibooks.com – [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS VII INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW 2015 EDITION IX INTRODUCTION XI I. DAVIES’S ATTITUDE TO AUTHORITY 23 II. SHOCKINGLY SLIPSHOD SCHOLARSHIP 55 III. THE VACANCY OF THE HOLY SEE 92 APPEN DI X : SUAREZ ON THE HERETICAL PO PE 148 IV. DISHONESTY, INCONSISTENCY AND ARROGANCE 164 V. WHICH SIDE IS MICHAEL DAVIES ON? 191 VI. MISCELLANEOUS DOCTRINAL ERRORS 255 VII. THE SOCIETY OF ST. PIUS X 273 VIII. DAVIES AS AN ANARCHIST 290 IX. ERRORS OF SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY 314 (A) THE O RDERS OF ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE 316 (B) THE 1968 NEW R ITE OF O RDINATION 355 (C) VALIDITY AND “S IGNIFICATIO EX A DJUNCTIS ” 396 (D) VALIDITY OF THE NOVUS ORDO MISSÆ 409 X.