DOCSLIB.ORG

Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses Dedicated to Patrick Henry Omlor The Grain of Incense: Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses — Rev. Anthony Cekada — www.traditionalmass.org Should we assist at traditional Masses offered “together with Thy servant Benedict, our Pope”? articulate any theological reasons or arguments for “Do not allow your tongue to give utterance to what your heart knows is not true.… To say Amen is to what he does. subscribe to the truth.” He has read or heard the stories of countless early — St. Augustine, on the Canon martyrs who chose horrible deaths, rather than offer even one grain of incense in tribute to the false, ecu- “Our charity is untruthful because it is not severe; menical religion of the Roman emperor. So better to and it is unpersuasive, because it is not truthful… Where there is no hatred of heresy, there is no holi- avoid altogether the Masses of priests who, through ness.” the una cum, offer a grain of incense to the heresiarch — Father Faber, The Precious Blood Ratzinger and his false ecumenical religion… In many parts of the world, however, the only tra- IN OUR LIVES as traditional Catholics, we make many ditional Latin Mass available may be one offered by a judgments that must inevitably produce logical conse- priest (Motu, SSPX or independent) who puts the false quences in our actual religious practice. The earliest pope’s name in the Canon. Faced with choosing this or that I remember making occurred at about age 14. Gui- nothing, a sedevacantist is then sometimes tempted to tar songs at Mass, I concluded, were irreverent. There- assist at the Mass anyway. after, throughout eight years in the diocesan seminary, The temptation will be much greater now, since I never once opened my mouth to sing one. Ratzinger has permitted the Motu Mass. In some dio- For some questions, the practical course of action ceses, older priests who were validly ordained have that follows from a judgment is self-evident: If the Paul come out of retirement to offer Mass according to the VI rite for making priests and bishops is invalid, we ’62 Missal. Moreover, a substantial number of priests should avoid the Masses these priests and bishops of- who were validly ordained in SSPX have defected to fer. organizations like the Fraternity of St. Peter and will For other questions, how we must act may not be also offer the Motu Mass. Such Masses will be valid. so obvious — or it may be dictated by instinct, because Why not simply overlook Benedict’s name in the we cannot necessarily explain all the underlying prin- Canon, and “just go for the Mass”? It’s just one grain of ciples. incense, after all… For some sedevacantists, one issue in particular Although various arguments have been offered to falls into the latter category: a traditional Latin Mass justify the assistance of sedevacantists at una cum offered by a validly ordained priest who utters a Masses, none of them really seems to ring true. phrase in the Canon referring to Benedict, our Pope. This The priests who offer these Masses assert in the practice is followed by all priests who offer the re- Canon that Ratzinger is a true pope, while a sedevacan- cently instituted Motu Masses, as well as by priests of tist (by definition) affirms the opposite. By actively the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), its affiliated organiza- assisting at such a Mass, a sedevacantist condones the tions and the majority of “independent” traditionalist assertion that the celebrant publicly makes in the name priests. of all present — Benedict, OUR Pope — an assertion that These Masses are also sometimes referred to as the sedevacantist knows and believes to be false. “una cum Masses,” from the Latin phrase in the Canon The inconsistency — a complete disconnect be- into which the name of a reigning pope is inserted: una tween belief and worship — should be obvious after cum famulo tuo Papa nostro N. (together with Thy ser- about 10 seconds of reflection. The theoretical conclu- vant N., our Pope) sion (Ratzinger is not a true pope), we sense, should Now, since a sedevacantist is a traditionalist who dictate the practical conclusion (don’t assist at Masses has concluded that Benedict XVI is a heretic and not a where the prayers say the opposite). true pope, his first instinct is to seek out a traditional But what are the underlying principles that should Latin Mass offered by a sedevacantist priest, and to dictate our course of action here? Why is it wrong for a avoid traditional Masses where the priest refers to sedevacantist to assist actively at a traditional Latin Benedict XVI as a pope. To act otherwise seems con- Mass in which the priest employs the phrase Benedict tradictory or somehow “feels” wrong for the sedeva- our Pope in the Canon? cantist, even though he may not necessarily be able to Because I have written much over the years about — 1 — sedevacantism, canon law and the sacred liturgy, I am writers have suggested additional readings and mean- now often asked this question. In this article I will an- ings. swer it at some length, because I consider the issue Lest my readers’ eyes immediately glaze over at crucial for the future of the traditionalist movement. the mere mention of Latin grammar, I will “translate” Moreover, there is a vast amount of material in the these grammatical differences into the meanings that writings of popes, dogmatic theologians, canonists, the una cum phrase conveys if the name Benedict (Jo- moral theologians, Vatican decrees and liturgical seph Ratzinger) is introduced into it: scholars that, taken together, provides us with a very clear answer to this question. (1) Adjective modifying Church = one with, or united Not everyone will have the patience to slog with: “The heretic/false pope Ratzinger is united to through a long article. I promise such readers that I the Catholic Church and vice versa.” will soon produce a brief summary of what follows, (2) Adverb modifying we offer = we offer together with: much as I offered a short résumé of my study on the “The heretic/false pope Ratzinger jointly offers the 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration. Holy Sacrifice of the Mass along with the priest and In either version, though, the structure of our in- the Church.” quiry will be fairly straightforward, and we will exam- (3) Appositional link with Church = for thy Church, ine the following points: which includes. “The heretic/false pope Ratzinger is (I) The meaning of the una cum phrase in the among the members of the Church for whom the Canon, both linguistically and theologically, and how priest and the Church intercede through the offering that meaning must be applied to Ratzinger. of the Mass.” (II) Whether the sedevacantist who actively par- ticipates in an una cum Mass likewise participates in (4) Coordinating conjunction with Church, bishop, all the prayer that contains that phrase. true believers = and for Thy servant, the pope: “The priest and the Church offer the Mass for the servant (III) Why a sedevacantist should not actively par- of God and heretic/false pope Ratzinger.” ticipate in such a Mass. In this, the long version of the article, we will also Some sedevacantists maintain that the fourth ex- present various arguments that have been made to jus- planation is the only possible meaning for the una cum tify assisting at Masses where Ratzinger is offered his phrase. The petition, they contend, is thus nothing grain of incense, and demonstrate how these need to more than a prayer of intercession offered for — and be taken with more than a grain of salt. We will con- they repeatedly emphasize the for — the welfare of clude with a summary. various members of the Church, rather than some sort of expression of union with a false pope. Thus the mere fact that a priest prays for Benedict by name in the I. The Meaning of the Prayer. Canon should not prevent a sedevacantist from assist- THE PHRASE under discussion (una cum famulo tuo Papa ing at his Mass. It’s a good thing to pray for people, nostro N.) appears in the opening prayer of the Canon after all… (the Te Igitur) that commends the Sacrifice to God. It is But this fourth meaning for una cum “translates” indicated below in bold: no better than the first three, because it still places Ratzinger (as its proponents admit) in a prayer offered “..which in the first place we offer up to Thee for for the members of the Church. And a sedevacantist must Thy holy Catholic Church, that it may please Thee reject this fourth proposition as well as the other three, to grant her peace, to protect, unite and govern her throughout the world, together with Thy servant because Ratzinger’s heresy removes him not simply N. our Pope, N. our Bishop, and all true believers from the papacy, but from the very Church itself. and professors of the Catholic and Apostolic Faith.” The canonists and theologians cited to support the key principle in the sedevacantist case state that it is What does the clause in bold actually mean? And the loss of membership in the Church that produces the more specifically, what meaning results when the loss of the pontificate. Thus the dogmatic theologian name of Benedict XVI is inserted into the phrase? Iragui says: To answer these questions, we will look first to the linguistic meaning of the phrase, and then to its “Theologians commonly concede that the Roman broader theological meaning in the context of the Canon Pontiff, if he should fall into manifest heresy, would of the Mass.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • James III and VIII
    Gale Primary Sources Start at the source. James III and VIII Professor Edward Corp Université de Toulouse Bonnie Prince Charlie Entering the Ballroom at Holyroodhouse before 30 Apr 1892. Royal Collection Trust/ ©Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018 EMPOWER™ RESEARCH The life story of James III and VIII is mainly contained Germain-en-Laye in France, James had good reason to within the Stuart Papers in the Royal Archives at be confident that he would one day be restored to the Windsor Castle. They contain thousands of documents thrones of his father. In the second (1719-66), when he in hundreds of volumes giving details of his political mainly lived at Rome, he increasingly doubted and and personal correspondence, of his finances, and of eventually knew that he would never be restored. The the management of his court. Yet it is important to turning point came during the five years from the recognise that the Stuart Papers provide a summer of 1714 to the summer of 1719, when James comprehensive account of the king's life only from the experienced a series of major disappointments and beginning of 1716, when he was 27 years old. They tell reverses which had a profound effect on his us very little about the period from his birth at personality. Whitehall Palace in June 1688 until he reached the age He had a happy childhood at Saint-Germain, where he of 25 in 1713, and not much about the next two years was recognised as the Prince of Wales and then, after from 1713 to the end of 1715.
    [Show full text]
  • Resignations and Appointments
    N. 210522b Saturday 22.05.2021 Resignations and Appointments Resignation and succession of metropolitan archbishop of Agrigento, Italy Appointment of metropolitan archbishop of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo Appointment of bishop of Ischia, Italy, and union in persona Episcopi of the dioceses of Pozzuoli and Ischia Appointment of auxiliary bishop of Busan, Korea Resignation and succession of metropolitan archbishop of Agrigento, Italy The Holy Father has accepted the resignation from the pastoral care of the metropolitan archdiocese of Agrigento, Italy, presented by His Eminence Cardinal Francesco Montenegro. He is succeeded by Archbishop Alessandro Damiano, until now coadjutor archbishop of the same archdiocese. Appointment of metropolitan archbishop of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo The Holy Father has appointed as metropolitan archbishop of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Bishop Fulgence Muteba Mugalu, transferring him from the diocese of Kilwa-Kasenga. Curriculum vitae Bishop Fulgence Muteba Mugalu was born on 9 July 1962 in the diocese of Kongolo, was ordained a priest on 5 August 1990 and appointed bishop of Kilwa-Kasenga on 18 March 2005. 2 After graduating in pastoral theology from the University of Montreal in Canada, he was professor of theology in Lubumbashi and at the Catholic University of Kinshasa; secretary of the Episcopal Commission for the Doctrine of the Faith of the National Episcopal Conference of Congo (CENCO) and later secretary general of the same Episcopal Conference. As a bishop he served as coordinator of the Inter-Diocesan Commission for Justice and Peace of the Ecclesiastical Province of Lubumbashi and president of the Episcopal Commission for the Doctrine of Faith of the CENCO.
    [Show full text]
  • Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and The
    Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and the Limits of Control in the Information Age Jan W Geisbusch University College London Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Anthropology. 15 September 2008 UMI Number: U591518 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591518 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration of authorship: I, Jan W Geisbusch, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature: London, 15.09.2008 Acknowledgments A thesis involving several years of research will always be indebted to the input and advise of numerous people, not all of whom the author will be able to recall. However, my thanks must go, firstly, to my supervisor, Prof Michael Rowlands, who patiently and smoothly steered the thesis round a fair few cliffs, and, secondly, to my informants in Rome and on the Internet. Research was made possible by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Jerome's Women Creating Identity and Fashioning Scholars
    Jerome’s Women Creating Identity and Fashioning Scholars Judith Margaret Nichols, M.LITT., B.A., GRAD.DIP.TESL. This Thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Western Australia School of Humanities Classics and Ancient History 2014 i Preface Jerome’s writings first came to my attention as an undergraduate. I was attracted by the vividness of his writing but puzzled that the female recipients of his correspondence tolerated such a vain, irascible and misogynistic mentor. I took my initial, tentative thesis to Dr Neil O’Sullivan, Discipline Chair of Classics and Ancient History at the University of Western Australia and Dr Michael Champion who listened patiently and encouraged me to persevere with a doctoral thesis. I am grateful to both men for their advice and suggestions in shaping this work. Dr O’Sullivan’s command of the classics pointed me in new and interesting directions. Dr Champion was extremely forbearing in listening to every new idea, commenting helpfully on successive drafts and making mentoring sessions enjoyable. I would also like to acknowledge the loving support of my husband, Tony, and our four adult children who have encouraged me and accepted my preoccupation without reproach. The translations in the thesis are my own, except where otherwise acknowledged. Translations of certain commentators have been included as reference points to my own and I have indicated where my interpretations differ from theirs. The standard unpunctuated Vulgate is among the texts that I regard as significant. ii iii Abstract This thesis studies the creation of identities and the role women play in Jerome’s socio-political, scholarly and eschatologically-oriented theology for Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Feeneyism Catholic? / François Laisney
    I S F That there is only one true Church, the one, Holy, Catholic, EENEYISM Apostolic, and Roman Church, outside of which no one can be saved, has always been taught by the Catholic Church. This dogma, however, has been under attack in recent times. Already last century, the Popes had to repeatedly rebuke the liberal Catholics for their tendency to dilute this The Catholic dogma, “reducing it to a meaningless formula.” But in the late 1940’s and early 1950’s, the same dogma was C Meaning of misrepresented on the opposite side by Fr. Feeney ATHOLIC and his followers, changing “outside the Church there is The Dogma, no salvation” into “without water baptism there is absolutely no salvation,” thereby denying doctrines which had been “Outside the positively and unanimously taught by the Church, that is, Baptism of Blood and Baptism of Desire. ? Catholic Church IS FEENEYISM REV. FR. FRANÇOIS LAISNEY There Is No CATHOLIC? Salvation” What is at stake?—Fidelity to the unchangeable Catholic Faith, to the Tradition of the Church. We must neither deviate on the left nor on the right. The teaching Church must “religiously guard and faithfully explain the deposit of Faith that was handed down through the Apostles,…this apostolic doctrine that all the Fathers held, and the holy orthodox Doctors reverenced and followed” (Vatican I); all members of the Church must receive that same doctrine, without picking and choosing what they will believe. We may not deny a point of doctrine that belongs to the IS deposit of Faith—though not yet defined—under the pretext that it has been distorted by the Liberals.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of Melancholy by Democritus Junior
    THE ANATOMY OF MELANCHOLY WHAT IT IS WITH ALL THE KINDS, CAUSES, SYMPTOMS, PROGNOSTICS, AND SEVERAL CURES OF IT IN THREE PARTITIONS; WITH THEIR SEVERAL SECTIONS, MEMBERS, AND SUBSECTIONS, PHILOSOPHICALLY, MEDICINALLY, HISTORICALLY OPENED AND CUT UP BY DEMOCRITUS JUNIOR [ROBERT BURTON] WITH A SATIRICAL PREFACE, CONDUCING TO THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSE PART 2 – The Cure of Melancholy Published by the Ex-classics Project, 2009 http://www.exclassics.com Public Domain CONTENTS THE SYNOPSIS OF THE SECOND PARTITION............................................................... 4 THE SECOND PARTITION. THE CURE OF MELANCHOLY. .............................................. 13 THE FIRST SECTION, MEMBER, SUBSECTION. Unlawful Cures rejected.......................... 13 MEMB. II. Lawful Cures, first from God. .................................................................................... 16 MEMB. III. Whether it be lawful to seek to Saints for Aid in this Disease. ................................ 18 MEMB. IV. SUBSECT. I.--Physician, Patient, Physic. ............................................................... 21 SUBSECT. II.--Concerning the Patient........................................................................................ 23 SUBSECT. III.--Concerning Physic............................................................................................. 26 SECT. II. MEMB. I....................................................................................................................... 27 SUBSECT. I.--Diet rectified in substance...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 24 Supplement
    2 GATHERED FRAGMENTS Leo Clement Andrew Arkfeld, S.V.D. Born: Feb. 4, 1912 in Butte, NE (Diocese of Omaha) A Publication of The Catholic Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania Joined the Society of the Divine Word (S.V.D.): Feb. 2, 1932 Educated: Sacred Heart Preparatory Seminary/College, Girard, Erie County, PA: 1935-1937 Vol. XXIV Supplement Professed vows as a Member of the Society of the Divine Word: Sept. 8, 1938 (first) and Sept. 8, 1942 (final) Ordained a priest of the Society of the Divine Word: Aug. 15, 1943 by Bishop William O’Brien in Holy Spirit Chapel, St. Mary Seminary, Techny, IL THE CATHOLIC BISHOPS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA Appointed Vicar Apostolic of Central New Guinea/Titular Bishop of Bucellus: July 8, 1948 by John C. Bates, Esq. Ordained bishop: Nov. 30, 1948 by Samuel Cardinal Stritch in Holy Spirit Chapel, St. Mary Seminary Techny, IL The biographical information for each of the 143 prelates, and 4 others, that were referenced in the main journal Known as “The Flying Bishop of New Guinea” appears both in this separate Supplement to Volume XXIV of Gathered Fragments and on the website of The Cath- Title changed to Vicar Apostolic of Wewak, Papua New Guinea (PNG): May 15, 1952 olic Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania — www.catholichistorywpa.org. Attended the Second Vatican Council, Sessions One through Four: 1962-1965 Appointed first Bishop of Wewak, PNG: Nov. 15, 1966 Appointed Archbishop of Madang, PNG, and Apostolic Administrator of Wewak, PNG: Dec. 19, 1975 Installed: March 24, 1976 in Holy Spirit Cathedral, Madang Richard Henry Ackerman, C.S.Sp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pontifical Decrees Against the Doctrine of the Earth’S Movement and the Ultramontane Defence of Them
    The Pontifical Decrees Against the Doctrine of The Earth’s Movement and the Ultramontane Defence of Them By Rev. William W. Roberts (1885) Introductory commentary by a Catholic layman in 2002 1543 Nicolaus Copernicus published De Revolutionibus Orbium Cœlestium (On the Revolutions of Spheres). 1534-1549 Reign of Pope Paul III, who was quite aware of Fr. Copernicus’ work. The two were actually friends. 1605-1621 Reign of Pope Paul V, who issued a 1616 decree condemning pro-heliocentricity work of Galileo Galilei. 1623-1644 Reign of Pope Urban VIII, who issued a 2nd decree [1633] condemning Copernicanism. 1655-1657 Reign of Pope Alexander VII, who issued a Bull [1664] reinforcing that Copernicanism was heretical. 1740-1758 Reign of Pope Benedict XIV, who removed the Copernican books from the Index in 1740. 1846-1878 Reign of Pope Pius IX, who called Vatican Council [1869-70] wherein Papal Infallibility was defined. In 1870 the Vatican Council promulgated the dogma of Papal Infallibility. Until then, the infallibility of the Catholic Church’s teachings had never been defined explicitly although accepted by the Fathers throughout its history. This definition brought criticism from those outside the Church and even from some within. There were at least three reasons for this: (1) It decreed that God Himself dictated the teachings of the Catholic Church, a notion that other religions were prone to deny; (2) some did not want to elevate the papacy to an infallible level, even when declaring matters of faith and morals; (3) some believed the Church had erred on previous occasions and that therefore the definition was erroneous.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2009 the Real Reason for the Society's Stand the State Of
    THE ANGELUS ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTICLE REPRINT Let your speech be “Yes, yes: no, no”; whatever is beyond these comes from the evil one. (Mt. 5:37) January 2009 Reprint #84 THE STATE OF NECEssITY In a letter dated July 8, 1987, Archbishop Lefebvre Rome’s extended hand, and, following its founder, the wrote to Cardinal Ratzinger: “The permanent will to Society of St. Pius X always remains ready to respond annihilate Tradition is a suicidal will, which justifies, favorably to the opportunity of these discussions with by its very existence, true and faithful Catholics when the authorities of the hierarchy. But these contacts have they make the decisions necessary for the survival of only one goal: to let the pure and integral voice of the Church and the salvation of souls.”1 In his homily Catholic Tradition be heard in Rome so that it might on the day of the episcopal consecrations of June 30, recover its rights in the whole Church. The discussions 1988, the Archbishop returned to this rule, from which will be in vain for as long as Rome maintains in he deduced the legitimacy of his actions. “Thus,” he principle the corrupted teachings of the Second Vatican explained, “we find ourselves in a case of necessity.... Council. This is why we are convinced that, by the act of these Things stand thus because the liturgical and consecrations today, we are obeying...the call of God.”2 doctrinal Tradition reigning prior to Vatican II is not just one form of Catholic expression among others in The Real Reason the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Davies an Evaluation
    MICHAEL DAVIES AN EVALUATION CLICK HERE TO BUY A HARD COPY OF THIS BOOK “To the best of my knowledge, no one has been able to point out a theologi- cal error in any of my books.” (Michael Davies, The Angelus , March 1984) “All my writing is governed by one criterion only, the truth.” (Michael Davies, The Remnant , 30 th November 1988) “I have now written four books, fourteen pamphlets, and countless articles, exposing the deficiencies of the post-Vatican II liturgical revolution. No one has, as yet, been able to point out any factual or doctrinal error in any of them.” (Michael Davies, The Remnant , 15th May 1989) MICHAEL DAVIES AN EVALUATION NEW EDITION JOHN S. DALY First edition 1989 This edition © copyright John S. Daly 2015 ISBN 978-2-917813-51-5 TRADIBOOKS ROUCHAS SUD 47180 SAINT -SAUVEUR DE MEILHAN , FRANCE http://www.tradibooks.com – [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS VII INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW 2015 EDITION IX INTRODUCTION XI I. DAVIES’S ATTITUDE TO AUTHORITY 23 II. SHOCKINGLY SLIPSHOD SCHOLARSHIP 55 III. THE VACANCY OF THE HOLY SEE 92 APPEN DI X : SUAREZ ON THE HERETICAL PO PE 148 IV. DISHONESTY, INCONSISTENCY AND ARROGANCE 164 V. WHICH SIDE IS MICHAEL DAVIES ON? 191 VI. MISCELLANEOUS DOCTRINAL ERRORS 255 VII. THE SOCIETY OF ST. PIUS X 273 VIII. DAVIES AS AN ANARCHIST 290 IX. ERRORS OF SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY 314 (A) THE O RDERS OF ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE 316 (B) THE 1968 NEW R ITE OF O RDINATION 355 (C) VALIDITY AND “S IGNIFICATIO EX A DJUNCTIS ” 396 (D) VALIDITY OF THE NOVUS ORDO MISSÆ 409 X.
    [Show full text]
  • Resignations and Appointments
    N. 201207b Monday 07.12.2020 Resignations and Appointments Appointment of bishop of Carpi, Italy, and union in persona Episcopi of the sees of Modena-Nonantola and Carpi Resignation and Appointment of military ordinary for Colombia Appointment of bishop of Carpi, Italy, and union in persona Episcopi of the sees of Modena-Nonantola and Carpi The Holy Father has appointed Archbishop Erio Castellucci, metropolitan archbishop of Modena-Nonantola and until now apostolic administrator of Carpi, as bishop of Carpi, Italy, uniting in persona Episcopi the sees of Modena-Nonantola and Carpi. Curriculum vitae Bishop-elect Erio Castellucci was born in Forlì on 8 July 1960. He completed his institutional studies for the priesthood at the Pontifical Regional Seminary Flaminio Benedetto XV in Bologna, obtaining a bachelor’s degree in theology (1983). Then as a student at the Pontifical Lombard Seminary of Santi Ambrogio e Carlo in Urbe in Rome he was awarded a doctorate in theology at the Pontifical Gregorian University (1988). He was ordained a priest on 5 May 1984 for the diocese of Forlì-Bertinoro. From 1984 to 1986 he served as pastoral collaborator at the parish of San Gregorio Magno alla Magliana, Rome; and from 1984 to 1992 parish priest at San Tommaso Apostolo in Durazzanino. Subsequently he was diocesan head of youth ministry, vice-rector of the minor seminary, dean of the Theological Faculty of Emilia- Romagna, member of the diocesan presbyteral and pastoral council, diocesan assistant to the AGESCI Scouts, episcopal vicar for culture, universities and schools, family, youth, vocations and tourism. Finally, in Forlì he was parish priest of San Giovanni Apostolo ed Evangelista, spiritual father in the episcopal seminary and lecturer at the Sant’Apollinare Higher Institute of Religious Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic University of America A
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA A Manual of Prayers for the Use of the Catholic Laity: A Neglected Catechetical Text of the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By John H. Osman Washington, D.C. 2015 A Manual of Prayers for the Use of the Catholic Laity: A Neglected Catechetical Text of the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore John H. Osman, Ph.D. Director: Joseph M. White, Ph.D. At the 1884 Third Plenary Council of Baltimore, the US Catholic bishops commissioned a national prayer book titled the Manual of Prayers for the Use of the Catholic Laity and the widely-known Baltimore Catechism. This study examines the Manual’s genesis, contents, and publication history to understand its contribution to the Church’s teaching efforts. To account for the Manual’s contents, the study describes prayer book genres developed in the British Isles that shaped similar publications for use by American Catholics. The study considers the critiques of bishops and others concerning US-published prayer books, and episcopal decrees to address their weak theological content. To improve understanding of the Church’s liturgy, the bishops commissioned a prayer book for the laity containing selections from Roman liturgical books. The study quantifies the text’s sources from liturgical and devotional books. The book’s compiler, Rev. Clarence Woodman, C.S.P., adopted the English manual prayer book genre while most of the book’s content derived from the Roman Missal, Breviary, and Ritual, albeit augmented with highly regarded English and US prayers and instructions.
    [Show full text]