DOCSLIB.ORG

January 2009 the Real Reason for the Society's Stand the State Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 2009 the Real Reason for the Society's Stand the State Of THE ANGELUS ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTICLE REPRINT Let your speech be “Yes, yes: no, no”; whatever is beyond these comes from the evil one. (Mt. 5:37) January 2009 Reprint #84 THE STATE OF NECEssITY In a letter dated July 8, 1987, Archbishop Lefebvre Rome’s extended hand, and, following its founder, the wrote to Cardinal Ratzinger: “The permanent will to Society of St. Pius X always remains ready to respond annihilate Tradition is a suicidal will, which justifies, favorably to the opportunity of these discussions with by its very existence, true and faithful Catholics when the authorities of the hierarchy. But these contacts have they make the decisions necessary for the survival of only one goal: to let the pure and integral voice of the Church and the salvation of souls.”1 In his homily Catholic Tradition be heard in Rome so that it might on the day of the episcopal consecrations of June 30, recover its rights in the whole Church. The discussions 1988, the Archbishop returned to this rule, from which will be in vain for as long as Rome maintains in he deduced the legitimacy of his actions. “Thus,” he principle the corrupted teachings of the Second Vatican explained, “we find ourselves in a case of necessity.... Council. This is why we are convinced that, by the act of these Things stand thus because the liturgical and consecrations today, we are obeying...the call of God.”2 doctrinal Tradition reigning prior to Vatican II is not just one form of Catholic expression among others in The Real Reason the Church. It cannot be defended by pleading only the cause of “all those Catholic faithful who feel attached for the Society’s Stand to some previous liturgical and disciplinary forms of The attitude of Archbishop Lefebvre and the the Latin tradition.”4 The defense of this Tradition is Society of St. Pius X is not reducible to a certain nothing more nor less than the defense of the integrity personal attachment to the Church’s Tradition. If it of the Catholic Faith, which is the common good of the only involved a personal attachment, we should have Church; by this very fact it entails the fight against the accepted long ago (as ultimately the priests of Campos reforms that issued from Vatican II which challenge did in 2002, and the priests of the Institute of the fundamental truths of faith and thus endanger the Good Shepherd in 2006) the principle of the personal common good of the Church. When this common good apostolic administration or of a personal parish, which of the Catholic Faith is considered by the authorities as are particular, limited legal frameworks within which the object of a simple personal attachment, a state of the expression of a personal attachment to the Tradition necessity exists. of the Church can legitimately prevail, more or less, according to the terms of the agreements. And because The State of Necessity this attachment is merely personal, there is no room for challenging the gains of the Second Vatican Council A state of necessity is an extraordinary situation in to which one must willy-nilly pledge allegiance, even which the necessaries of natural or supernatural life are if it is only by signing the New Profession of Faith of threatened in such a way that to safeguard them one 1989.3 Archbishop Lefebvre never refused in principle finds oneself habitually obliged to break the law. Now, law is essentially intended by legislators to procure 19 THE ANGELUS ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTICLE REPRINT Benedict XVI has set about correcting not only the abuses but also the false principles of the Council, it becomes necessary to cease a resistance that can no these necessaries to their subjects. In the Church, longer be justified; it becomes necessary to accept the whole edifice of ecclesiastical law is by definition the canonical statute proposed by Rome. This is what ordered to the preaching of the doctrine of faith and 5 the priests of Campos and those of the Institute of the the administration of the sacraments. If the application Good Shepherd have done. But if one has kept one’s of the law goes against the end of the law intended by eyes open, one sees that the state of necessity still the legislators, it is no longer legitimate because self- exists, and this is why the resistance must continue. contradictory. The subjects can and must take no notice Just as in June 1988 Archbishop Lefebvre would of it in order to obtain the end of the law despite the have performed “Operation Suicide”8 had he decided authorities who apply the law contrary to the law. against consecrating the four bishops, so also today, It is clear that since the Second Vatican Council obtaining a purely canonical solution for the Society of the Church has found herself in such a situation. The St. Pius X from Rome would be “very imprudent and common good of the Church is the handing down of the hasty,” as Bishop Fellay recently reaffirmed.9 In fact, Catholic Faith, and if the pope has received authority it is possible that circumstances have evolved on this from Christ, it is uniquely to safeguard Tradition. Now, or that point since the Roman authorities have been since the Council, instead of continuing to transmit trying to establish a new equilibrium far removed from the deposit of faith as did all their predecessors for two the shameful abuses that followed the implementation thousand years, the men of the Church have taken it of the Council. But for all that, the circumstances upon themselves to impose on the faithful the principal have not changed fundamentally insofar as the same theses of the new theology condemned by Pius XII in Roman authorities in charge of reforming abuses are Humani Generis and then confirmed by Vatican Council still imbued with the same false principles of Vatican II, II and the reforms that followed, novelties absolutely which are the ultimate source of the abuses. contrary to all that our Lord taught. Since 1965, the This analysis, moreover, has been confirmed authorities of the Church have imposed a new Creed by the events of the last 20 years, which correspond in three articles, with religious liberty, ecumenism, with an aggravation of the crisis. The distance that and collegiality; since 1969, they have also imposed a has opened between the two liturgies amounts to reformed liturgy with a new Mass of Protestant spirit an abyss separating two conceptions of the Church and sacraments renewed in an ecumenical sense. and the Faith.10 The extent of this separation can These popes have imposed the grave errors of neo- be measured by the force with which the national modernism, already condemned by their predecessors. episcopacies oppose the initiative of the Motu Proprio Faced with this generalized protestantization, the Summorum Pontificum. Even if the traditional rite of Church must react. A state of necessity exists that the Church is not supposed to exclude the new rite, legitimates resistance; it is this resistance that explains its extension is viewed badly. The same opposition the work of Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society of was to be seen when the Vatican proposed correcting Saint Pius X. the mistranslations of “pro multis,” which is part of the words of consecration in the Mass. These two examples The Enduring Dilemma show that Rome is not followed when it comes to Archbishop Lefebvre perceived the dilemma: either reining in abuses. On the other hand, Rome is pursuing capitulate to tyranny under pretext of obedience, or else ecumenical dialogue more than ever and continues resist tyranny by rejecting false obedience. to preach the principle of the secular State. Another very tangible result of the crisis is the steep decline in If this government [the conciliar Church] abandons its vocations in the last two decades.11 duty and turns against the Faith, what ought we to do? Remain attached to the government, or attached to the Faith? We have a choice. Does the Faith take precedence? A Doubly False Argumentation Or is it the government that takes precedence? We are In a little book published last year by Éditions faced with a dilemma and we are indeed obliged to make Sainte Madeleine of the Monastery of Le Barroux, the a choice.6 Most Reverend Fernando Arêas Rifan reasons exactly The choice was made and the defense of the Faith as if a state of necessity not only no longer exists prevailed over false obedience: more than 20 years after the episcopal consecrations We do not reject the pope’s authority, but rather what at Ecône, but that it never existed. The book, entitled he does. We do indeed recognize the pope’s authority, but Tradition and the Living Magisterium, is a revision of a when he makes use of it to do the opposite of that for which “pastoral orientation” addressed to the priests of the St. it was given him, it is obvious that we cannot follow him.7 John Vianney Apostolic Administration of Campos. It These words were spoken 20 years ago. Today, comprises three chapters. The first claims to recall the everything still hinges on this state of necessity. If one basic givens of traditional theology on the magisterium. believes that it no longer exists, deeming that Pope The following two chapters apply these principles, the second to the question of the Mass, and the third THE ANGELUS • January 2009 www.angeluspress.org 20 to the teachings of the Second Vatican Council. The in every age of history, the present teachings of the fundamental flaw of this reflection is twofold: it presents Catholic hierarchy always rest upon those of the past, a warped idea of the magisterium, and it denies the in keeping with the words of St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John Courtney Murray and Martin Luther on the Relationship Between Church and State Faith Elizabeth Burgess
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 29 | Issue 6 Article 12 1-1978 John Courtney Murray and Martin Luther on the Relationship between Church and State Faith Elizabeth Burgess Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Faith Elizabeth Burgess, John Courtney Murray and Martin Luther on the Relationship between Church and State, 29 Hastings L.J. 1561 (1978). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol29/iss6/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. John Courtney Murray and Martin Luther on the Relationship Between Church and State By FAr= ELIZABETH BURGESS* Introduction IT IS TEN YEARS since the death of the well-known American Jesuit, John Courtney Murray. Murray's scholarly life exem- plified the enormous changes which have taken place in the Roman Catholic Church during the last fifty years. He began his writing in the early 1940's and quickly became involved in the issue of the relationship between Roman Catholicism and modem democ- racy. This involvement led him to the broader question of formu- lating a theory of the relationship between church and state which could be applied to different political situations. Murray's work in the area of church and state elicited strong opposition, and by the early 1950's he had been advised to let the subject rest; at least he should not write anything on the church-state question without clear- ing his ideas with his superiors first.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses
    Dedicated to Patrick Henry Omlor The Grain of Incense: Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses — Rev. Anthony Cekada — www.traditionalmass.org Should we assist at traditional Masses offered “together with Thy servant Benedict, our Pope”? articulate any theological reasons or arguments for “Do not allow your tongue to give utterance to what your heart knows is not true.… To say Amen is to what he does. subscribe to the truth.” He has read or heard the stories of countless early — St. Augustine, on the Canon martyrs who chose horrible deaths, rather than offer even one grain of incense in tribute to the false, ecu- “Our charity is untruthful because it is not severe; menical religion of the Roman emperor. So better to and it is unpersuasive, because it is not truthful… Where there is no hatred of heresy, there is no holi- avoid altogether the Masses of priests who, through ness.” the una cum, offer a grain of incense to the heresiarch — Father Faber, The Precious Blood Ratzinger and his false ecumenical religion… In many parts of the world, however, the only tra- IN OUR LIVES as traditional Catholics, we make many ditional Latin Mass available may be one offered by a judgments that must inevitably produce logical conse- priest (Motu, SSPX or independent) who puts the false quences in our actual religious practice. The earliest pope’s name in the Canon. Faced with choosing this or that I remember making occurred at about age 14. Gui- nothing, a sedevacantist is then sometimes tempted to tar songs at Mass, I concluded, were irreverent.
    [Show full text]
  • Dignitatis Humanae: the Catholic Church's Path to Political Security
    Mystērion: The Theology Journal of Boston College Volume I Issue I Article 4 Dignitatis humanae: The Catholic Church’s Path to Political Security Sean O’Neil Boston College, [email protected] DIGNITATIS HUMANAE: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH’S PATH TO POLITICAL SECURITY SEAN O’NEIL1* Abstract: The Catholic Church has always had a complicated relationship with the political states in which it operates. While much of the Church’s history has shown that the institutional Church’s power relative to the state fluctuates as it has sought to retain political autonomy, it was in the centuries after the Enlightenment in which the most serious threats to the Church’s temporal security began to arise. Considering these alarming trends, the Second Vatican Council’s Declaration on Religious Freedom (Dignitatis humanae) revisited the Church’s relationship with the state in an attempt to secure the Church’s political security in the twentieth century and beyond. Primarily focused on the right to religious freedom, Dignitatis humanae’s authors construct an argument based upon individual claims to religious liberty that ultimately allows the Church to confer upon itself similar protections. Though Dignitatis humanae cedes political authority, it reasserts the Church’s primacy in religious considerations, as well as the disparate judgmental capacities of religious and secular authorities. In concluding, this article will argue that Dignitatis humanae’s significance is two-fold: (1) the Church relinquishes claims to secular governing authority, but (2) elevates its true source of political protection—its individual members—to the forefront of its concern. Introduction In response to questioning from the council of Hebrew elders about his preaching of the Gospel, Saint Peter noted: “We must obey God rather than any human authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecclesiastical Circumscriptions and Their Relationship with the Diocesan Bishop
    CANON 294 ECCLESIASTICAL CIRCUMSCRIPTIONS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DIOCESAN BISHOP What is the relationship of the faithful in personal ecclesiastical circumscriptions to the local diocesan bishop? OPINION The Apostolic See, in the Annual General Statistical Questionnaire, asks diocesan bishops the number of priests in the ecclesiastical circumscription of the diocese, their country of origin and whether they are diocesan or religious. The fact that the diocesan bishop is answering these questions indicates the close relationship between himself and any personal Ecclesiastical Circumscription. Canons 215 and 216 of the 1917 Code required that ecclesiastical circumscriptions be territorial within a diocese and an apostolic indult was needed, for example, to establish personal parishes for an ethnic group of the faithful. After World War II, Pope Pius XII provided for the pastoral care of refugees and migrants in his apostolic constitution Exsul Familia in 1952. Chaplains for migrants were granted special faculties to facilitate pastoral care without receiving the power of jurisdiction or governance. The Second Vatican Council admitted personal criteria in ecclesiastical organisation. The decree Christus Dominus 11 held that the essential element of a particular Church is personal, being a “portion of the people of God”. Personal factors are crucial to determine the communitarian aspect of the makeup of a community. After Vatican II, the Code of Canon Law needed revision. The Synod of Bishops in 1967 approved the principles to guide the revision of the code. The eighth principle stated: “The principle of territoriality in the exercise of ecclesiastical government is to be revised somewhat, for contemporary apostolic factors seem to recommend personal jurisdictional units.
    [Show full text]
  • Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and The
    Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and the Limits of Control in the Information Age Jan W Geisbusch University College London Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Anthropology. 15 September 2008 UMI Number: U591518 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591518 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration of authorship: I, Jan W Geisbusch, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature: London, 15.09.2008 Acknowledgments A thesis involving several years of research will always be indebted to the input and advise of numerous people, not all of whom the author will be able to recall. However, my thanks must go, firstly, to my supervisor, Prof Michael Rowlands, who patiently and smoothly steered the thesis round a fair few cliffs, and, secondly, to my informants in Rome and on the Internet. Research was made possible by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Church's Perspective of Human Dignity As the Basis Of
    start page: 221 Stellenbosch eological Journal 2017, Vol 3, No 2, 221–241 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17570/stj.2017.v3n2.a10 Online ISSN 2413-9467 | Print ISSN 2413-9459 2017 © Pieter de Waal Neethling Trust Th e Catholic Church’s perspective of human dignity as the basis of dialogue with the secular world Alva, Reginald Nanzan University, Japan [email protected] Abstract The Catholic Church maintains that the Imago Dei is the ground for human dignity. The secular world, too, endorses human dignity as the foundation for human rights without referring to Imago Dei. The Catholic Church and the secular world both agree on the importance of human dignity, even though they differ on their views about the source of human dignity. In this paper, we shall examine if human dignity can be the basis of a fruitful dialogue between the Catholic Church and the secular world in order to make our world a better place to live. The primary resources for our study are the Church documents on human dignity, and the opinions of distinguished thinkers on the need to promote a culture of dialogue between religions and secular world. Key words Catholic Church; Imago Dei; secular world; human dignity 1. Introduction The United Nations (UN) in its charter of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) gave a pivotal role to the concept of human dignity.1 Even though the charter does not refer to the transcendental nature of human person or Imago Dei (image of God) as the basis of human dignity, it maintains that all persons are born with equal and inherent dignity, irrespective of their class, caste, creed, religion, sex, and economical, political or social conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 8-19-2020 Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists Anthony Philip Stine Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Stine, Anthony Philip, "Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5604. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7476 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists by Anthony Philip Stine A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Affairs and Policy Dissertation Committee: Christopher Shortell, Chair Kent Robinson Jennifer Allen Daniel Jaffee Portland State University 2020 © 2020 Anthony Philip Stine Abstract The principles of Catholic Social Teaching as represented by the writings of 150 years of popes as well as the theorists inspired by those writings are examined, as well as the two principal schools of thought in the sustainability literature as represented by what is classically called the anthropocentric or managerial approach to sustainability as well as the biocentric school of thought. This study extends previous research by analyzing what the Catholic Church has said over the course of centuries on issues related to society, economics, and the environment, as embodied in the core concepts of subsidiarity, solidarity, stewardship, the common good, and integral human development.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO PUBLIC CATHOLICISM AND RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN AMERICA: THE ADAPTATION OF A RELIGIOUS CULTURE TO THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF DIVERSITY, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Michael J. Agliardo, SJ Committee in charge: Professor Richard Madsen, Chair Professor John H. Evans Professor David Pellow Professor Joel Robbins Professor Gershon Shafir 2008 Copyright Michael J. Agliardo, SJ, 2008 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Michael Joseph Agliardo is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2008 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents......................................................................................................................iv List Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................vi List of Graphs ......................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. viii Vita.............................................................................................................................................x
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity and Mediation in the French Stream Of
    SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Timothy R. Gabrielli Dayton, Ohio December 2014 SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor _________________________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Anthony J. Godzieba, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Vincent J. Miller, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Timothy R. Gabrielli All rights reserved 2014 iii ABSTRACT SOLIDARITY MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. University of Dayton Advisor: William L. Portier, Ph.D. In its analysis of mystical body of Christ theology in the twentieth century, this dissertation identifies three major streams of mystical body theology operative in the early part of the century: the Roman, the German-Romantic, and the French-Social- Liturgical. Delineating these three streams of mystical body theology sheds light on the diversity of scholarly positions concerning the heritage of mystical body theology, on its mid twentieth-century recession, as well as on Pope Pius XII’s 1943 encyclical, Mystici Corporis Christi, which enshrined “mystical body of Christ” in Catholic magisterial teaching. Further, it links the work of Virgil Michel and Louis-Marie Chauvet, two scholars remote from each other on several fronts, in the long, winding French stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Legalization of Greek Catholic Church in Czechoslovakia in 1968
    E-Theologos, Vol. 1, No. 2 DOI 10.2478/v10154-010-0017-3 Legalization of Greek Catholic Church in Czechoslovakia in 1968 Jaroslav Coranič University of Prešov in Prešov, Faculty of Greek-Catholic Theology A re-legalization of the Greek Catholic Church in Czechoslovakia was one of the most important results of the revival of socio - political process of the Prague Spring. This Church, unlike the Roman Catholic Church in the period 1950 - 1968 did not even exist legally. It was due to power interference of the communist state power in 1950. The plan of Commu- nist Party assumed the "transformation" of Greek Catholic Church into the Orthodox one. Procedure of liquidation of the Greek Catholic Church later came to be known as Action "P". Its climax came in April 28th 1950, when “sobor of Presov”, being prepared for a longer time, took place. The gath- ering in “sobor” manipulated by the communists declared in “sobor” the abolition of the Union with the Vatican, as a result the Greek Catholic Church ceased exist in Czechoslovakia and the clergy and faithful were meant to became the members of the Orthodox Church.1 In fact only a small part of the Greek Catholic clergy succumbed to power pressure and accepted Orthodoxy. Church leaders, as well as many priests who refused to change to the Orthodox have been arrested and sentenced to many years of punishment. The other Greek-Catholic clergy and their families were deported to the Czech lands and were forbidden to perform a duty of priestly ministry and banned from staying in eastern Slovakia for several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the New Rite of Episcopal Consecration Is Valid Fr
    ANGELUSTHE MAGAZINE REPRINT WHY THE NEW RITE OF EPISCOPAL CONSECRATION IS VALID Fr. Pierre-Marie, O.P. This article wishes to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest prob- lems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, The Angelus presents (for the first time in English) a study of this question concluding that it is valid. 2 This article was translated exclusively by Angelus Press from Sel de la Terre (No.54., Autumn 2005, pp.72-129). Fr. Pierre-Marie, O.P., is a member of the traditional Dominican monastery at Avrillé, France, several of whose members were ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre and which continues to receive its priestly ordinations from the bishops serving the Society of Saint Pius X which Archbishop Lefebvre founded. He is a regular contributor to their quarterly review, Sel de la Terre (Salt of the Earth). The English translations contained in the various tables were prepared with the assistance of H.E. Bishop Richard Williamson, Dr. Andrew Senior (professor at St. Mary’s College, St. Mary’s, Kansas), and Fr. Scott Gardner, SSPX. ollowing the Council, in 1968 a new rite for Orders or is merely “a sacramental,” an ecclesiastical the ordination of bishops was promulgated. ceremony wherein the powers of the episcopate, It was, in fact, the first sacrament to undergo its “bound” in the simple priest, are “freed” for the “aggiornamento,” or updating.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2009 the Real Reason for the Society's Stand the State Of
    THE ANGELUS ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTICLE REPRINT Let your speech be “Yes, yes: no, no”; whatever is beyond these comes from the evil one. (Mt. 5:37) January 2009 Reprint #84 THE STATE OF NECEssITY In a letter dated July 8, 1987, Archbishop Lefebvre Rome’s extended hand, and, following its founder, the wrote to Cardinal Ratzinger: “The permanent will to Society of St. Pius X always remains ready to respond annihilate Tradition is a suicidal will, which justifies, favorably to the opportunity of these discussions with by its very existence, true and faithful Catholics when the authorities of the hierarchy. But these contacts have they make the decisions necessary for the survival of only one goal: to let the pure and integral voice of the Church and the salvation of souls.”1 In his homily Catholic Tradition be heard in Rome so that it might on the day of the episcopal consecrations of June 30, recover its rights in the whole Church. The discussions 1988, the Archbishop returned to this rule, from which will be in vain for as long as Rome maintains in he deduced the legitimacy of his actions. “Thus,” he principle the corrupted teachings of the Second Vatican explained, “we find ourselves in a case of necessity.... Council. This is why we are convinced that, by the act of these Things stand thus because the liturgical and consecrations today, we are obeying...the call of God.”2 doctrinal Tradition reigning prior to Vatican II is not just one form of Catholic expression among others in The Real Reason the Church.
    [Show full text]