Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 8-19-2020 Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists Anthony Philip Stine Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Stine, Anthony Philip, "Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5604. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7476 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists by Anthony Philip Stine A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Affairs and Policy Dissertation Committee: Christopher Shortell, Chair Kent Robinson Jennifer Allen Daniel Jaffee Portland State University 2020 © 2020 Anthony Philip Stine Abstract The principles of Catholic Social Teaching as represented by the writings of 150 years of popes as well as the theorists inspired by those writings are examined, as well as the two principal schools of thought in the sustainability literature as represented by what is classically called the anthropocentric or managerial approach to sustainability as well as the biocentric school of thought. This study extends previous research by analyzing what the Catholic Church has said over the course of centuries on issues related to society, economics, and the environment, as embodied in the core concepts of subsidiarity, solidarity, stewardship, the common good, and integral human development. This body of work and the core principles therein present a set of standards and guidance that will enable the work of non- governmental organizations, state actors, and individual activists to achieve the commonly accepted goals of sustainable development in a manner that respects the autonomy of persons and families as well as respect for cultures and communities of historically poor and oppressed peoples in the developing world, as well as in the wealthy nations that drive much of the development agenda. i Dedication The To my amazing wife Krystle and To my family who supported my education ii Acknowledgements I wish to express my sincere appreciation to my advisor, Professor Christopher Shortell, who has a remarkable amount of patience: he calmly guided and pushed me in this process to not only finish this document but to provide a document that was better than I could have written on my own. Without his persistent help, the final product would never have been realized. iii Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................ i Dedication ........................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1 Sustainability and the Catholic Approach ...................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Authority and Catholic Social Teaching ...................................................... 42 Chapter 3 Social Sustainability..................................................................................... 71 Chapter 4 Social and Political Arrangements ............................................................... 92 Chapter 5 Economics in the Catholic Society .............................................................114 Chapter 6 The Environment and Humanity ................................................................ 148 Chapter 7 CST In Practice and Implications .............................................................. 177 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 224 References ....................................................................................................................... 231 iv Chapter 1 Sustainability and the Catholic Approach Sustainable development is a preeminent issue in the world of public policy. The issue is steeped in much history. At present, the debate intersects issues of social justice, environmental degradation, the sovereignty and autonomy of indigenous peoples, global governance, and numerous issues related to economics and democracy. These issues are built upon debates about the nature of the human person and the collective and individual relationship human beings have with the natural environment. The debates in the literature focused initially on what is often called the developed world presently, but over time grew to include the concerns and needs of the developing world.1 This reflected the underlying assumptions of those who initially developed the concepts and later those who saw value in the concept of sustainable development but sought to have the issues not included in this debate given the attention that was deserved. As a concept, sustainable development seeks to address a problem. While the problem associated with sustainable development is environmental degradation, the environment is only one important facet of the problem. Sustainable development seeks to address structures and relationships that lead to environment harm, including human relationships, economic systems, geopolitical relationships, and an international 1 While recognizing the complexity and value-laden nature of the various terms used in the various development-related fields, I will be using the terms “developing world” and “developed world” predominantly throughout this dissertation, in part due to this being a work of political and administrative theory, and also in part in recognition of the dignity of the peoples of the developing world and the complex relationship that the developed world has with them. 1 environment that is characterized by competition instead of cooperation between peoples and states. These issues are interconnected and require a holistic approach (Flint 2013). Sustainable development is an issue concerned centrally with social justice (Vincent 2009; Dobbs 1999). Until recently, the discussion for sustainable development excluded the countries of the developing world, with many of these countries struggling for influence (Fischer and Green 2004). The work of sustainable development is presently being done by a wide range of actors. Governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), individual activists, academics, members of the business community, and others from every conceivable realm are engaged in this work. These efforts are multi-stakeholder, and the complex nature of these relationships makes implementation of programs difficult, with policy successes both not as common as the supporters of sustainable development claim but also not as rare as the detractors either (Beishem and Simon 2015). There are numerous reasons for this, but at the most basic level, the issue of wicked problems is at the center. A wicked problem is defined by Rittel and Webber (1973) as those incomprehensibly complex and messy issues that are difficult to define, let alone to solve due to the complex intersectional nature of the problem with other social issues. For the purposes of this dissertation, I use the definition of sustainable development that comes from The World Commission On Environmental Development (WCED) report Our Common Future (aka, the Brundtland Commission Report), which defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs,” (Brundtland 1987, 43). According to the report, this definition contains within it 2 two key concepts: the concept of ”needs,” in particular the essential needs of the world’s poor to which overriding priority should be given, and the idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment’s ability to meet present and future needs (Brundtland 1987, 43). The Commission recognized that sustainable development requires the promotion of values that develop standards for consumption that all human beings can reasonably aspire to that are within the bounds of the ecological limits of consumption (Brundtland 1987). Built into the definition put forth by the Commission in Our Common Future is a recognition of what the Catholic Church calls the dignity of the human person, as recognized in the requirement that consumption levels be available to all human beings. Human dignity is essential to this dissertation and is given focus in Chapters 3 and 4. The prevailing attitude among some researchers and policy planners had been until recently that Christianity was in large part responsible for the environmental crisis. The most influential theorist was Lynn White, who in 1967 published the deeply influential article “The Roots Of Our Ecological