DOCSLIB.ORG

Functional Interdependence Theory: an © 2016 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Functional Interdependence Theory: an © 2016 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc PSRXXX10.1177/1088868316657965Personality and Social Psychology ReviewBalliet et al. 657965research-article2016 Article Personality and Social Psychology Review 1 –28 Functional Interdependence Theory: An © 2016 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc. Reprints and permissions: Evolutionary Account of Social Situations sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1088868316657965 pspr.sagepub.com Daniel Balliet1, Joshua M. Tybur1, and Paul A. M. Van Lange1 Abstract Social interactions are characterized by distinct forms of interdependence, each of which has unique effects on how behavior unfolds within the interaction. Despite this, little is known about the psychological mechanisms that allow people to detect and respond to the nature of interdependence in any given interaction. We propose that interdependence theory provides clues regarding the structure of interdependence in the human ancestral past. In turn, evolutionary psychology offers a framework for understanding the types of information processing mechanisms that could have been shaped under these recurring conditions. We synthesize and extend these two perspectives to introduce a new theory: functional interdependence theory (FIT). FIT can generate testable hypotheses about the function and structure of the psychological mechanisms for inferring interdependence. This new perspective offers insight into how people initiate and maintain cooperative relationships, select social partners and allies, and identify opportunities to signal social motives. Keywords interdependence, power, conflict, cooperation, evolution Interdependence is the greatest challenge to the maturity of behavior affects their own and others’ outcomes—can pro- individual and group functioning. vide key insights into how organisms are adapted to the social —K. Lewin; Marrow (1969, p. 226)1 environment (e.g., Roberts, 2006; Tomasello, Melis, Tennie, Wyman, & Herrmann, 2012; Tooby & Cosmides, 1996). To The demands of interdependent social life that “select” for illustrate, evolutionary biologists argue that corresponding certain behavior tendencies in the course of an individual’s life versus conflicting fitness outcomes between individuals can may also have selected genetically for humans with those determine whether cooperation evolves in a species (e.g., tendencies or, at least, with the aptitude for readily learning Hamilton, 1964; Trivers, 1971). Although this work has not them. always focused on humans, it implies that different forms of human interdependence in the ancestral environment would —Kelley and Thibaut (1978, p. 181) have produced psychological adaptations for navigating interdependence (Doebeli & Hauert, 2005; Skyrms, 2004; We operate in a world where the inferred costs and benefits of Tomasello et al., 2012). Hence, understanding how humans actions are relevant to our understanding of our exchange relations. deal with Lewin’s great challenge of interdependence requires —Tooby, Cosmides, and Price (2006, p. 118) a consideration of not only contemporary social environments but also the ancestral past and the types of adaptations that Interdependence provides significant opportunities and chal- underlie our psychology of interdependence. lenges to any organism. This is especially the case for But what was the form of interdependence in the ancestral humans, given the richness of our social lives. Indeed, Lewin, past? And what adaptations might have evolved in response a pioneer of social psychology, suggested that navigating the to these types of interdependence? Here, we answer both of landscape of interdependence is a foundational challenge to these questions by detailing the fundamental structures of group and individual functioning (Marrow, 1969). Seventy interdependence proposed by Kelley and Thibaut (1978) and years later, Lewin’s observation seems prescient given the the types of information processing systems these structures volume of biological and social science work dedicated to understanding how interdependence shapes human behavior 1VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e.g., Emerson, 1976; Kelley et al., 2003; Maynard-Smith, 1974; Montgomery, 1998; Olson, 1965). Corresponding Author: Daniel Balliet, VU Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Recent biological perspectives on social behavior suggest Amsterdam, The Netherlands. that interdependence—the manner in which each individual’s Email: [email protected] Downloaded from psr.sagepub.com at Vrije Universiteit Bibliotheek on July 27, 2016 2 Personality and Social Psychology Review should have produced using Tooby and Cosmides’s (1992) implausible that the mind has evolved for the general func- approach to understanding psychological adaptations. This tion of “engage in fitness-promoting behavior” (or, pertinent integration can be used to generate novel hypotheses regard- to this article, “navigate interdependence”; Cosmides & ing the function and structure of psychological mechanisms Tooby, 1994a; Kurzban, 2010). One of the key contributions for detecting and responding to the specific types of interde- of evolutionary psychology concerns the emphasis on func- pendence within social situations. We argue that this approach tional specialization of psychological mechanisms (fre- advances evolutionary social psychology by unifying several quently referred to as “modularity”; Barrett & Kurzban, research topics (e.g., cooperation, coordination, power, non- 2006; Cosmides & Tooby, 1994b). The varied nature of verbal behavior, and emotional expressions) under a com- adaptive problems favors the evolution of specialized psy- mon theoretical framework. Before outlining our theory, chological mechanisms, each of which processes specific though, we briefly describe the theoretical foundations of information in a functional manner. evolutionary psychology and interdependence theory. But what are these environmental barriers to ultimately reproducing that have shaped psychological mechanisms? Evolutionary Psychology: Adaptations Evolutionary psychologists, following Bowlby (1969), sug- for Interdependence and Cooperation gest that psychological adaptations (i.e., functionally spe- cialized mechanisms) were shaped by conditions in their Evolutionary theory forms the foundation of scientific inves- EEAs (Tooby & Cosmides, 1990, 2005). Each specialized tigations of interdependence, social interaction, and coopera- psychological mechanism can, theoretically, be shaped in tion across disciplines (Alcock, 2001). Population biologists and by a different EEA. The EEA for mechanisms underly- use evolutionary game theory models to understand how the ing snake detection and avoidance, for example, concerns the structure of organisms’ interdependence can select for coop- environmental conditions in which snakes threatened our erative tendencies (West, El Mouden, & Gardner, 2011); hominid ancestors (Öhman & Mineka, 2001), whereas the ethologists study how different social environments and EEA for mechanisms underlying anticuckoldry adaptations ecologies give rise to varied cooperative strategies across involves environments of paternal investment mixed with taxa (Wilson, 2012); human behavioral ecologists examine extra-pair sex (Buss, 2006). Based on knowledge of the how humans cooperate to solve various interdependent prob- ancestral past, evolutionary psychologists often generate and lems, including hunting, coalitional aggression, and child test hypotheses about the ultimate, fitness-relevant function care (Alvard & Nolin, 2002; Hrdy, 2007; Mathew & Boyd, and proximate, information processing structure of modern 2011); and social psychologists use evolutionary theory to psychology. understand the psychological mechanisms underlying social Although these principles have led to novel predictions interactions (DeScioli & Kurzban, 2013; Kenrick, Li, & and new information regarding the nature of prejudice Butner, 2003; Neuberg & Schaller, 2014; Simpson & (Schaller & Neuberg, 2008), emotion (Tybur, Lieberman, Gangestad, 2001). Kurzban, & DeScioli, 2013), visual perception (Jackson & Each approach aims to understand a fundamental ques- Cormack, 2007), morality (DeScioli & Kurzban, 2013), tion about interdependent biological organisms: How would cooperation (Delton, Cosmides, Guemo, Robertson, & selection favor adaptations that motivate organisms to coop- Tooby, 2012), and aggression (Sell, Tooby, & Cosmides, erate, and so incur costs to provide benefits to others? And, 2009), they have also been criticized on theoretical and especially importantly for psychologists, how would these empirical grounds. Criticisms regarding functional special- (psychological) adaptations be executed? The evolutionary ization have highlighted that “domain general” mechanisms psychology paradigm articulated by Tooby, Cosmides, and (e.g., working memory) can be used in a fitness-promoting others provides a framework for understanding how psycho- fashion (Laland & Brown, 2011). However, the evidence for logical adaptations have been shaped by natural selection to functionally specialized mechanisms is strong (see Kurzban, promote cooperation (Buss, 1995; Symons, 1990; Tooby & 2010; Pinker, 1997, for overviews), and mechanisms need Cosmides, 1992). We discuss two theoretical principles of not be applied to only one adaptive problem to be function- evolutionary psychology that are pertinent to our theory: the ally specialized (e.g., Barrett & Kurzban, 2006). concept of functional specialization and the concept of the Other criticisms have highlighted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Introspectionism' and the Mythical Origins of Scientific Psychology
    Consciousness and Cognition Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 634–654 www.elsevier.com/locate/concog ‘Introspectionism’ and the mythical origins of scientific psychology Alan Costall Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, UK Received 1 May 2006 Abstract According to the majority of the textbooks, the history of modern, scientific psychology can be tidily encapsulated in the following three stages. Scientific psychology began with a commitment to the study of mind, but based on the method of introspection. Watson rejected introspectionism as both unreliable and effete, and redefined psychology, instead, as the science of behaviour. The cognitive revolution, in turn, replaced the mind as the subject of study, and rejected both behaviourism and a reliance on introspection. This paper argues that all three stages of this history are largely mythical. Introspectionism was never a dominant movement within modern psychology, and the method of introspection never went away. Furthermore, this version of psychology’s history obscures some deep conceptual problems, not least surrounding the modern conception of ‘‘behaviour,’’ that continues to make the scientific study of consciousness seem so weird. Ó 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Introspection; Introspectionism; Behaviourism; Dualism; Watson; Wundt 1. Introduction Probably the most immediate result of the acceptance of the behaviorist’s view will be the elimination of self-observation and of the introspective reports resulting from such a method. (Watson, 1913b, p. 428). The problem of consciousness occupies an analogous position for cognitive psychology as the prob- lem of language behavior does for behaviorism, namely, an unsolved anomaly within the domain of an approach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2000) 23, 573–644 Printed in the United States of America The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism Steven W. Gangestad Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 [email protected] Jeffry A. Simpson Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 [email protected]. Abstract: During human evolutionary history, there were “trade-offs” between expending time and energy on child-rearing and mating, so both men and women evolved conditional mating strategies guided by cues signaling the circumstances. Many short-term matings might be successful for some men; others might try to find and keep a single mate, investing their effort in rearing her offspring. Recent evidence suggests that men with features signaling genetic benefits to offspring should be preferred by women as short-term mates, but there are trade-offs between a mate’s genetic fitness and his willingness to help in child-rearing. It is these circumstances and the cues that signal them that underlie the variation in short- and long-term mating strategies between and within the sexes. Keywords: conditional strategies; evolutionary psychology; fluctuating asymmetry; mating; reproductive strategies; sexual selection Research on interpersonal relationships, especially roman- attributes (e.g., physical attractiveness) tend to assume tic ones, has increased markedly in the last three decades greater importance in mating relationships than in other (see Berscheid & Reis 1998) across a variety of fields, in- types of relationships (Buss 1989; Gangestad & Buss 1993 cluding social psychology, anthropology, ethology, sociol- [see also Kenrick & Keefe: “Age Preferences in Mates Re- ogy, developmental psychology, and personology (Ber- flect Sex Differences in Human Reproductive Strategies” scheid 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links Across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2
    Psychological Topics, 26 (2017), 1, 89-137 Original Scientific Paper – UDC – 616.89-008.442.6 159.923.3.072 613.88 Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2 David P. Schmitt - Bradley University, USA, Lidia Alcalay - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Jüri Allik - University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, I.C.B. Alves - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Craig A. Anderson - Iowa State University, USA, A.L. Angelini - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Jens B. Asendorpf - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Ivars Austers - University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, Isabel Balaguer - University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, Américo Baptista - University of Lusofona-Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, Sóley S. Bender - University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, Kevin Bennett - Penn State University-Beaver, USA, Gabriel Bianchi - Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, Behrooz Birashk - Faculty of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Tehran Psychiatric Institute, Tehran, Iran, April Bleske-Rechek - University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, USA, Fredrick A. Boholst - University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines, Lynda Boothroyd - University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, Teresa Borja - Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, Arjan Bos - Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Edwin Brainerd - Clemson University, USA, David P. Schmitt, Department of Psychology, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 62625, USA until August of 2017. Afterward send correspondence to David P. Schmitt, Psychology Division, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Data collection representing Costa Rica was from the University of Costa Rica and was supported by the University of Costa Rica Psychological Research Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Psychology
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997,4 (3), 342-349 T. V. Moore's (1939) Cognitive Psychology AIMEEM. SURPRENANT and IANNEATH Purdue University, WestLafayette, Indiana Thomas Verner Moore published a book called Cognitive Psychology in 1939,almost 30 years be­ fore Neisser's (1967) more familiar and far more influential work. Although it covers most of the stan­ dard topics found in current cognitive psychology textbooks, and even anticipated several current trends, Moore's text is not cited by any ofthe major histories of the "cognitive revolution" or any cur­ rent cognitive textbook. Weprovide a briefsketch of Moore's academic life and summarize several of his papers that are still cited. After describing the psychologies prevalent in 1939,we compare Moore's text with two contemporary works, Woodworth (1938) and McGeoch (1942). We conclude by com­ paring the older textwith Neisser's and by offering several reasons why the book is virtually unknown. Cognitive psychology differs from other areas of sci­ ner, 1985; Lachman, Lachman, & Butterfield, 1979) or entific psychology in that it loudly and proudly proclaims any ofthe current undergraduate cognitive textbooks cite to have arisen out ofa (largely bloodless) revolution. The the work. Neisser himselfwas unaware ofthe earlier vol­ very phrase "cognitive revolution" implies a fundamen­ ume until a few years after his version was published; in­ tal change in theories and research into human thought deed, his title might have been different ifhe had known and behavior and a complete overthrow of the previous about the earlier work (Neisser, personal communica­ way of thinking. As with most revolutions, the circum­ tion, June 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Seven Functionalism: Development and Founding
    Chapter Seven Functionalism: Development and Founding PSY 495 History and Systems Dr. Rick Grieve Western Kentucky University Evolution Comes to America z Background – 1900: American psychology had taken on a life of its own z Functions of the mind z Individualism, inventiveness, and ingenuity z Herbert Spencer (1820(1820--1903)1903) – Kooky, but became a hero in America – Social Darwinism z Evolution and natural selection apply to the social realm Evolution Comes to America z Spencer argued that the development of all aspects of the universe follows evolutionary principles – Including human character and social institution z “survival of the fittest” – Those who are best adapted will be those most likely to survive and pass traits on to future generations – Only the best will survive – Leave people and organizations alone to develop themselves and society in their own ways • Those which cannot adapt are unfit for survival and should be allowed to perish • This way, society could eventually achieve perfection 1 Evolution Comes to America – Synthetic Philosophy z Knowledge and experience can be explained in terms of evolutionary principles z Principles of Psychology (1855) – Mind exists in its present form because of past and continuing efforts to adapt to various environments The Continuing Evolution of Machines z Henry Hollerith and the Punched Cards – Hollerith was an engineer who developed punched cards z Improve d the a bilitbility o f mac hines to process da ta – Radically altered info processing – Renewed hopes (and fears) that
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Perception (Michaels & Carello, 1981)
    Direct Perception Claire F Michaels LAKE FOREST COLLEGE Claudia Carello UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT PRENTICE-HALL, INC, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 ii Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Michaels, Claire F. (1948) Direct perception. (Century psychology series) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Perception. 2. Environmental psychology. I. Carello, Claudia, joint author. 11. Title. BF311.M496 153.7 80-28572 ISBN 0-13-214791-2 Editorial production/supervision and interior design by Edith Riker Manufacturing buyer Edmund W. Leone In Memory of JAMES JEROME GIBSON (1904-1979) CENTURY PSYCHOLOGY SERIES James J. Jenkins Walter Mischel Willard W. Hartup Editors ©1981 by Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 07632 Copyright tranferred to authors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the authors. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Prentice-Hall International, Inc., London Prentice-Hall of Australia Pty. Limited, Sydney Prentice-Hall of Canada, Ltd., Toronto Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi Prentice-HaH of Japan, Inc., Tokyo Prentice-Hall of Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd., Singapore Whitehall Books Limited, Wellington, New Zealand iii Contents Credits vi Preface vii 1 CONTRASTING VIEWS OF PERCEPTION 1 Indirect Perception: The Theory of Impoverished Input, 2 Direct Perception: The Ecological View, 9 Additional Contrasts, 13 Summary, 16 Overview of the Book, 17 iv 2 INFORMATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT 19 Invariants,
    [Show full text]
  • Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology
    Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology Edited by Claude E. Buxton Department of Psychology Yale University New Haven, Connecticut 1985 ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers) Orlando San Diego New York London Toronto Montreal Sydney Tokyo Passages from the following are reprinted by permission of the publishers: Newell, Α., Duncker on Thinking, in S. Koch & D. Leary (Eds.), A Century of Psychology as Science. Copyright 1985 by McGraw-Hill. Neisser, U., Cognitive Psychology. © 1967 by Prentice-Hall. COPYRIGHT © 1985 BY ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPY, RECORDING, OR ANY INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBLISHER. ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. Orlando, Florida 32887 United Kingdom Edition published by ACADEMIC PRESS INC. (LONDON) LTD. 24-28 Oval Road, London NW1 7DX LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING IN PUBLICATION DATA Main entry under title: Points of view in the modern history of psychology. Includes indexes. 1. Psychology— History. I. Buxton, Claude E. BF81.P57 1985 150\9 85-4010 ISBN 0-12-148510-2 (alk. paper) PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 85 86 87 88 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contributors Numbers in parentheses indicate the pages on which the authors' contributions begin. Mitchell G. Ash (295), Department of History, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 William Bevan (259), John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, Illinois 60603 Arthur L. Blumenthal (19, 51), Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Claude E.
    [Show full text]
  • Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links Across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2
    Psychological Topics, 26 (2017), 1, 89-137 Original Scientific Paper – UDC – 616.89-008.442.6 159.923.3.072 613.88 Narcissism and the Strategic Pursuit of Short-Term Mating: Universal Links across 11 World Regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2 David P. Schmitt - Bradley University, USA, Lidia Alcalay - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Jüri Allik - University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, I.C.B. Alves - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Craig A. Anderson - Iowa State University, USA, A.L. Angelini - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Jens B. Asendorpf - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Ivars Austers - University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, Isabel Balaguer - University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, Américo Baptista - University of Lusofona-Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, Sóley S. Bender - University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, Kevin Bennett - Penn State University-Beaver, USA, Gabriel Bianchi - Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, Behrooz Birashk - Faculty of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Tehran Psychiatric Institute, Tehran, Iran, April Bleske-Rechek - University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, USA, Fredrick A. Boholst - University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines, Lynda Boothroyd - University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, Teresa Borja - Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, Arjan Bos - Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Edwin Brainerd - Clemson University, USA, David P. Schmitt, Department of Psychology, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 62625, USA until August of 2017. Afterward send correspondence to David P. Schmitt, Psychology Division, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Data collection representing Costa Rica was from the University of Costa Rica and was supported by the University of Costa Rica Psychological Research Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Psychology 4910
    1 Psychology 4910 – Chapter 10: The Psychology of Adaptation Heraclitus – World of Becoming – world that we see is in a constant state of chang - phusis (fundamental substance of matter) was fire Parmenides – World of Being – underlying permanent reality of the world was an unchanging substance Aristotle’s Scala Natura or Great Chain of Being + observations of fossils & different forms of life in foreign countries Lamarkian evolution theory - Vitalism – living things cannot be explained in purely mechanical terms because something immaterial distinguishes living from nonliving things - Vitalism – enabled living things to improve and perfect themselves over long periods of time. just as living organisms changed throughout life (e.g. grubs grew wings & became butterflies) – species could change over time idea of evolution Theory of evolution needs two principles: (1) Mechanism for change (2) Mechanism for preserving the changes that arise. Romantic (Lamarckian) Evolution Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 – 1829) – taxonomist - living species have innate drive to perfect themselves - organisms adapt to their environment and change in the process inheritance of acquired characteristics Herbert Spencer – “survival of the fittest” (1852) Charles Darwin (1809 – 1882) - provided the mechanism for change in species: Natural selection - naturalist on board Beagle which sailed around the world - noticed the huge variety in living things - e.g. variety of finches on Galapagos Islands which differed slightly (e.g. in type of beak) depending on food
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology's Contribution to the Education of Children in Twentieth-Century North America
    THE EDUCATED SELF: PSYCHOLOGY'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY NORTH AMERICA by Ann-Marie Theresa McLellan B.A. (Honours), Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 1994 M.A., Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 1999 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Faculty of Education © Ann-Marie Theresa McLellan SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2008 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Ann-Marie Theresa McLellan Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: The Educated Self: Psychology's Contribution to the Education of Children in Twentieth-Century North America Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Rina Zazkis Dr. Jack Martin, Professor Senior Supervisor Dr. Jeff Sugarman, Associate Professor Committee Member Dr. Ann Chinnery, Assistant Professor Internal/External Examiner Dr. Tom Strong, Associate Professor, University of Calgary External Examiner Date Defended/Approved: ii SIMONUNIVERSITYFRASERII-brary DECLARATION OF PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection, and, without changing the content, to translate the thesis/project or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • Incredible Utility 1
    Incredible utility 1 Incredible utility: The lost causes and causal debris of psychological science John E. Richters Rockville, Maryland Direct correspondence to: John E. Richters 13200 Valley Drive Rockville, MD 20850 [email protected] Incredible utility 2 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 The incredible utility of perpetual motion ................................................................................................................................ 4 Incredible utility thesis ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 The plumbing and wiring of individual differences methodology ........................................................................................ 6 Table 1. .............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Individual-level theoretical models ................................................................................................................................. 11 Aggregate-level empirical models .................................................................................................................................. 12 The inferential passage from aggregates to individuals ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Integral Leaders Can Contribute to the Growth of Emerging Leaders Susan M
    Antioch University AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses Dissertations & Theses 2015 A Mixed Methods Perspective: How Integral Leaders Can Contribute to the Growth of Emerging Leaders Susan M. Hayes Antioch University - PhD Program in Leadership and Change Follow this and additional works at: http://aura.antioch.edu/etds Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Developmental Psychology Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Leadership Studies Commons, Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons, Nonprofit Administration and Management Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons Recommended Citation Hayes, Susan M., "A Mixed Methods Perspective: How Integral Leaders Can Contribute to the Growth of Emerging Leaders" (2015). Dissertations & Theses. 232. http://aura.antioch.edu/etds/232 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses at AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses by an authorized administrator of AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A MIXED METHODS PERSPECTIVE: HOW INTEGRAL LEADERS CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE GROWTH OF EMERGING LEADERS SUSAN M. HAYES A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Ph.D. in Leadership and Change Program of Antioch University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July, 2015 This is to certify that the Dissertation entitled: A MIXED METHODS PERSPECTIVE: HOW INTEGRAL LEADERS CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE GROWTH OF EMERGING LEADERS prepared by Susan M. Hayes is approved in partial fulfillment of the regulations for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Leadership and Change.
    [Show full text]