DOCSLIB.ORG

Scottish Government Yearbook 1990 ADOPTING CONVENTIONAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scottish Government Yearbook 1990 ADOPTING CONVENTIONAL Scottish Government Yearbook 1990 Scottish Government Yearbook 1990 On the face of it, the 1987 Election result should have been, and for a short time undoubtedly was, of greater concern to Chester Street than Keir Hardie House. After all, here was a party of government who had been ADOPTING CONVENTIONAL WISDOM- LABOUR'S RESPONSE TO reduced to such an extent that they could barely even staff the limited THE NATIONAL QUESTION organs of Scottish government through the Scottish Office. Conversely Labour had consolidated its dominance of Scottish politics. One party had power-but little popular support-the other party had popular support but Susan Deacon no legitimate means of exercising power. Labour had a choice, with 50 MPs to the Tories' 10 and a virtual The late 1980s has seen a re-emergence of the debate within the monopoly of Scottish Local Government, they could either challenge the Labour Party around the Scottish Question. For the first time since those Tories' mandate in Scotland and throw away the Westminster rule book; or heady days of the late 1970s Scottish political columnists have regularly they could play safe, hang fire and trust that the Scottish people would wait 'dined out' on analysis and speculation surrounding the issues. It is a until England voted Labour too. frequent source of frustration to players in the political game-of whatever persuasion - that the recording of such events by the media and academia Labour was slow to address the problems or arguably the alike often provides a sanitised or even inaccurate account of events. The opportunities. No immediate challenge was mounted and, once the pages which follow are an account of Labour's attempt to grapple with the summer 'silly season' was over, the Conservatives strengthened in their national question from the perspective of someone who is both a student of, resolve and embarked upon an active Scottish legislative programme. and participant in, Scottish Labour Politics. No doubt many will disagree Impatience began to grow in Labour's ranks- and the predictable criticism with both the contents and conclusions of the present contribution - not of a vociferous Nationalist opposition and an assiduous Scottish Press soon least of all within the party itself - but every attempt has been made to took root in the cry of 'the Feeble Fifty'. ensure that the facts do get in the way of a good story. In August 1987 the then dominant 'left' pressure group, the Labour Politics is a fickle business. Yesterday's heresy can very quickly Co-ordinating Committee, hosted a well-attended one-day conference in become today's shibboleth. The Declaration of Sovereignty signed at the Edinburgh on the question of the Scottish Mandate. Many of the thorny first Constitutional Convention meeting on The Mound is a case in point. questions were beginning to be addressed. Could the battle be fought in Twelve months prior to the meeting many, even (or perhaps especially) in Parliament alone? Should Labour be prepared to work alongside other the Labour Party, would have thought it barely credible that Westminster political parties? How should the campaign against the poll tax be loyalists such as Donald Dewar, John Maxton and John Smith - not to developed? What role was there for the Campaign for a Scottish Assembly? mention old style anti-devolutionists like Brian Wilson, Bob Hughes and Eric Milligan-would have been willing to throw the collective might of the There was a general acceptance of the need for Labour to use its People's Party behind the assertion that the will of the Scottish people was strength in Scotland to challenge the government more effectively. Also sovereign over that of a Westminster Government. The significance of gaining force was the call for Labour to have a special conference to Labour giving its official backing to such a concept should not be under­ examine the new political situation. But despite the presence of a host of estimated. The party's conversion to, and eventual participation in, the influential party figures, few of the ideas thrown up were translated into Scottish Constitutional Convention marked a watershed in its attitude to action in the weeks that followed. the question of Scottish Home Rule. In the meantime the Party's Scottish Executive had launched a new In the immediate run up to the 1987 General Election a few dissident campaigning initiative in the form of a 'Canvass for Scotland' of the voices raised the spectre of "the Doomsday Scenario". The mere Glasgow Cathcart and Garscadden constituencies. The fact that the vast contemplation that Labour could sustain a third consecutive West.minster majority of electors in two of Labour's safest seats told Party convassers defeat was considered by Labour's establishment to be heretical or, worse that they were in favour of a Scottish Assembly was not entirely still, tantamount to conspiring to such an outcome. Hence the calls of ultra­ unpredictable but it did show the Devolution issue was once agaon to the devolutionists such as Denis Canavan MP, and others, for Labour to forefront of Labour's agenda. develop a fallback strategy to deal with such a result were brushed aside. September 1987 witnessed the Festival for Scottish Democracy. The 62 63 Scottish Government Yearbook 1990 Scottish Government Yearbook 1990 event, largely the brainchild of the Scottish Trades Union Congress On 27th January, 1988 the Bill was debated in Parliament and, as (STUC), was designed to bring together the pro-devolution and anti­ expected, voted down. But Labour's well laid plans to launch a campaign government forces from Scottish political and public life in a celebration of around its new proposals were overtaken by a well-timed government inter­ Scottish culture and in demand of a change to Scotland's system of vention in the Paisley Grammar affair. Labour's Bill quickly fell from the government. In the event the occasion was marred by sectarian inter-party headlines. The decisive rejection of the Bill in Parliament on the same day squabbles. The torrential rain which fell relentlessly on the day provided a as the government's demonstration of its ability to ride roughshod over the convenient excuse as to why attendances and spirits were not higher. decision of a Labour Council served only to strengthen the claims of Labour's Nationalist opponents. This event was nonetheless significant in several respects. It demonstrated the emerging role of the STUC, under the leadership of Although its public impact was limited, the Bill did represent a Campbell Christie, as an increasingly influential force in Scottish politics. significant change in the substance of Labour's Devolution policy. The Its efforts to build broad based campaigning has become a feature of the hallmarks of the new Bill were the economic teeth the Assembly would Scottish political scene in recent years. It also exhibited a growing have, and its increased autonomy from Westminster. The Scottish willingness on the part of the Labour Party to work on such terms. The Parliament would not be financed solely by the 'cap in hand' block grant refusal of the SNP to take part in the event and the eleventh hour system but would have powers to vary the rate of income tax. The Assembly withdrawal of the Alliance were also a timely reminder of the difficulties in would also control the electricity supply industry, the Scottish building effective cross party cooperation. Development Agency, Highlands and Islands Development Board, and government intervention in industry, in addition to the Universities, Eventually, in November 1987 the party gathered in the Usher Hall, manpower and training, forestry and the police. Edinburgh at a Special Conference to examine the way forward for the party in Scotland. This was to beome one of the more forgettable Labour Labour's 1978 Act had allowed Westminster a right of veto over Movement gatherings in recent years. The sole topic of discussion was an Assembly legislation. The new Bill effectively removed this by giving eight page statement from the party's Scottish Executive, the sentiments virtual autonomy to the new Parliament unless it acted ultra vires. If and rhetoric were impressive but it was sadly lacking in suggestions as to Westminster disapproved of Assembly legislation, the Privy Council would how concrete short-term victories could be secured. Most notably it failed be asked to adjudicate as to the Assembly's power to legislate. to refer to the fact, let alone address the problem, of the disparity between Labour's support north and south of the Border. It questioned the right of The Bill proposed a 144-seat Assembly, with each of 71 Parliamentary the Conservatives to foist unpopular policies on an unwilling Scottish Constituencies returning two members, and Orkney and Shetland people but pointed no way forward for Labour, stating: returning one each. Elections in the fixed-term four-year Parliament would be by the first past the post system. The new Bill also proposed a significant The Labour Party in Scotland has the clear objective in the next four diminution in the responsibilities of the Secretary of State, reducing the years of working for the return of a Labour government for the whole of office to that of link between London and Edinburgh. the United Kingdom at the next election. A central feature of the development of Labour's policy on home-rule The problem was, what if the Scottish people could not- or would not­ is its incremental nature. In each new position statement the party quietly wait that long? Despite some dissent, the document was passed edged a few steps further down the Horne Rule road. Only later, after the unamended.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Issue
    Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 £2.00 Comment Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 t is difficult to maintain constitutional Ineutrality at this tail-end of 2013. Of course we will continue to do our best to keep the SLR open as a space for Contents anyone on the Scottish left, a place where they can feel at home and contribute Comment .......................................................2 to a debate that stretches beyond the boundaries of party or constitutional Democracy in writing ....................................4 position. That is our duty as a magazine Jean Urquhart created expressly for that purpose. Solid foundations for change .........................6 But the duty lies not only on us to Michael Keating keep that space open but on all sides to fill that space. Because it can surely not Our share of the future ..................................8 be possible for us to face the desolation Robin McAlpine which lies across Scottish society in the dog-days of this unlucky year without Graveyard or get-together ..........................10 some sort of answer to what lies all Isobel Lindsay around us. Welfare Nation State ...................................12 What answer to Grangemouth? John McInally Facile talk of ‘the need to work together’ is an insult to the collective intelligence. Labour and the trade unions .......................14 All it states is that if we keep the fork Gregor Gall, Richard Leonard, Bob Crow and let others keep the knife, it will be impossible for us to eat on our own. That Real energy answers ...................................18 may not be a bad thing, but someone Andy Cumbers needs to explain why.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2002
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Scotland Quarterly Report November 2002 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Contents 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 4 2. The Scottish Parliament Mark Shephard 7 3. The Media Philip Schlesinger 11 4. Public Attitudes and identity John Curtice 14 5. Scotland/UK Relations Alex Wright 18 6. Scotland/International Relations Alex Wright 22 7. Relations with Local Government Neil McGarvey 27 9. Legal Disputes Barry Winetrobe 31 10. Political parties James Mitchell 32 11. Public policies Barry Winetrobe 34 2 Key points: James Mitchell — First Minister Jack McConnell became embroiled in an embarrassing internal constituency row over local party funds; — Culture Minister Mike Watson broke collective cabinet responsibility by speaking out—but not voting—against Executive health policy fearing that he might lose votes in the forthcoming Scottish elections; — Herald newspaper went up for sale with the prospect that it will be bought by owners of Scotsman rivals. 3 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 1.1 Collective responsibility The application of the doctrine of collective responsibility has been under the spotlight in the Glasgow hospitals issue. The Culture Minister, Mike Watson, has been a leading public opponent of the reorganisation plan, but voted with the Executive in a debate on the issue on 12 September. His MPA, Janis Hughes, put herself in an even more unusual position, by abstaining on the Executive amendment to the critical SNP motion, but then voting for the as-amended motion. The First Minister refused to sack either, on the basis that they had both adhered to collective responsibility by their votes.
    [Show full text]
  • © Patricia M`Cafferty, May 2004. Abstract
    PATRICIA MCCAFFERTY WORKING THE 'THIRD WAY': NEW LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS, AND SCOTTISH DEVOLUTION THESIS PRESENTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW MAY 2004 © PATRICIA M`CAFFERTY, MAY 2004. ABSTRACT Labour's election victory in 1997 was heralded as a new era, the dawn of a Third Way, a novel attempt to chart a unique political course overcoming the perceivedlimitations of both New Right and Old Labour. In this thesis I explore the era of New Labour generally and, in particular, the impact of the Third Way on working lives. Key to my analysis is New Labour's attempt to synthesise oppositional interests,in particular those of capital and labour. This involves a crucial rhetoric of flexibility, competitivenessand partnership. My research explores the rhetoric of New Labour in relation to the reality of this new force in power. It does this by: " drawing out key features in the development of New Labour, especially its relation to Old Labour; " examining central elementsof New Labour ideology; " arguing that Scotland should be seen as central to the transition from Old to New :Labour; " utilising a case study of industrial relations developments in a major electronics factory in the West of Scotland and, to a lesser extent, key developmentsin public sector employment. My main finding is that where New Labour's ideology promisespositive benefits, the form of its implementation has negative impacts for workers. Since I take New Labour as a process, my thesis concludes with a more speculative exploration of possible future developments,both in relations to New Labour's role in them, and their possible impact on the New Labour project.
    [Show full text]
  • Bute House the Offi Cial Residence of the First Minister of Scotland
    Bute House The offi cial residence of the First Minister of Scotland Bute House 20pp brochure 02.indd 1 17/07/2017 08:53 Welcome to Bute House ince I became First Minister, I have welcomed thousands of people to Bute House. As the official residence of the First Minister of Scotland, it is here that I host official guests from this country and overseas on behalf of the nation. Bute House is also the meeting place of the Scottish Cabinet and the venue for official functions including meetings, receptions, lunches and dinners. Within these walls, I get to bring together people from all walks of life through meetings with business leaders, public service employees and the voluntary sector, and receptions to celebrate all aspects of Scottish society and success. Every Christmas, I even get to welcome youngsters from around the country for an annual children’s party. All year round Bute House performs a dual role of both residence and place of work for the First Minister. All four of my predecessors lived here too, and their portraits line the wall of the staircase leading to the Cabinet Room. Before the Scottish Parliament was reconvened in 1999, Bute House was home to eight different Secretaries of State for Scotland from 1970 onwards. Many of the key conversations and decisions in recent Scottish political history have taken place within these walls. Even without its modern role, however, Bute House would be of significant historic interest. It was built in the late 18th century, and is at the heart of one of the great masterpieces of Georgian architecture – the north side of Robert Adam’s Charlotte Square.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Stewart2019.Pdf
    Political Change and Scottish Nationalism in Dundee 1973-2012 Thomas A W Stewart PhD Thesis University of Edinburgh 2019 Abstract Prior to the 2014 independence referendum, the Scottish National Party’s strongest bastions of support were in rural areas. The sole exception was Dundee, where it has consistently enjoyed levels of support well ahead of the national average, first replacing the Conservatives as the city’s second party in the 1970s before overcoming Labour to become its leading force in the 2000s. Through this period it achieved Westminster representation between 1974 and 1987, and again since 2005, and had won both of its Scottish Parliamentary seats by 2007. This performance has been completely unmatched in any of the country’s other cities. Using a mixture of archival research, oral history interviews, the local press and memoires, this thesis seeks to explain the party’s record of success in Dundee. It will assess the extent to which the character of the city itself, its economy, demography, geography, history, and local media landscape, made Dundee especially prone to Nationalist politics. It will then address the more fundamental importance of the interaction of local political forces that were independent of the city’s nature through an examination of the ability of party machines, key individuals and political strategies to shape the city’s electoral landscape. The local SNP and its main rival throughout the period, the Labour Party, will be analysed in particular detail. The thesis will also take time to delve into the histories of the Conservatives, Liberals and Radical Left within the city and their influence on the fortunes of the SNP.
    [Show full text]
  • “We Wanted a Parliament but They Gave Us a Stone” the Coronation Stone of the Scots As a Memory Box in the Twentieth Century
    “We wanted a parliament but they gave us a stone” The Coronation Stone of the Scots as a Memory Box in the Twentieth Century JÖRG ROGGE In this article a memory box is presented, in which and to which different meanings were contained and attached in the course of seven centuries.1 This memory box is the coronation stone of Scottish kings, nowadays on display in Edinburgh Castle, the external form of which has remained for the most part unchanged. The roughly 150 kg heavy, 67 cm long, 42 cm wide and 28 cm high sandstone block was used in the Middle Ages at the inauguration of Scottish kings.2 In the course of history, however, it was removed from its original functional context and transferred to other cultural and political contexts. In this connection, both diachronic and also synchronic transfers of the coronation stone and the concepts of political order in the island of Britain stored in it were carried out. At present it is still an important memory box filled with political concepts, and it was and is a starting point for research into the relationship between the Scots and the English over the past 700 years. It is remarkable that this stone was used by nationally emotional Scots and also by the Government in London as symbol in important debates in the twentieth century. Historical recollections are transported by the Scots and the English with the stone that one may certainly call a container of memory. Here I 1 My thanks go to John Deasy for translating the German text into English as well as to the editors for finishing the final formatting.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 23Rd OCTOBER 1964
    672 THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 23rd OCTOBER 1964 DUNBARTONSHIRE Edinburgh Leith Burgh Constituency East Dunbartonshire County Constituency James Hutchison Hoy, Esquire. Cyril Raymond Bence, Esquire. Edinburgh North Burgh Constituency West Dunbartonshire County Constituency Walter Francis John Montagu Douglas Scott, Esquire Thomas Steele, Esquire. (commonly called Earl of Dalkeith). Edinburgh Pentlands Burgh Constituency FIFE Norman Russell Wylie, Esquire, Q.C. East Fife County Constituency Edinburgh South Burgh Constituency Sir John Edward GilmouTj Baronet. Alan Michael Clark Hutchison, Esquire. West Fife County Constituency Edinburgh West Burgh Constituency Captain William Winter Hamilton. James Anthony Stodart, Esquire. Dunfermline burghs Burgh Constituency MORAY AND NAIRNSHIRE Adam Hunter, Esquire. Moray and Nairn County Constituency Kirkcaldy burghs Burgh Constituency Gordon Thomas Calthrop Campbell, Esquire, M.C Harry Philp Heggie Gourlay, Esquire. ORKNEY AND ZETLAND INVERNESS-SHIRE AND Ross AND CROMARTY Orkney and Zetland County Constituency Inverness County Constituency The Right Honourable Joseph Grimond. David Russell Johnston, Esquire. Ross and Cromarty County Constituency PERTHSHIRE AND KINROSS-SHIRE Alasdair Roderick Mackenzie, Esquire. Kinross and West Perthshire County Constituency Western Isles County Constituency The Right Honourable Sir Alexander Frederick Douglas- Malcolm Kenneth Macmillan3 Esquire. Home, K.T. Perth and East Perthshire County Constituency KIRKCUDBRIGHTSHIRE AND WIGTOWNSHIRE Ian MacArthur, Esquire. Galloway
    [Show full text]
  • By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92
    Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Convention for Giving Firm Shape to That Will
    We Commend ..... This report is about practical intent. It says: "Here is what we are going to do," not "here is what we would like". Those who seek inspirational home rule rhetoric are respectfully directed elsewhere, including to the Convention's own previous publications. We have moved on. We regard the argument in principle as compelling. The longing of the people of Scotland for their own Parliament rings clear and true every time opinion is sounded. We believe that the momentum for change is now too great to deny; and that a Scottish Parliament will soon be meeting for the first time in nearly three centuries. What has been missing has been a practical scheme for bringing the Parliament into existence, and a hard-headed assessment of what it will be able to achieve. That is the gap which this report fills. This report shows that the Parliament can work, and it shows how. In doing so, it answers opponents who have tried to portray a Scottish Parliament as a pipe- dream, a fantasy which the Scots, unlike other peoples around the world, somehow cannot turn into reality. The Convention has a diverse membership, as diverse as we could make it. Diversity and unanimity are not natural companions. It is the instinct of political parties to disagree with one another, and the instinct of civic groups like the churches, the trade unions and others to be impatient with the preoccupations of politicians. This has meant that a lot of time and effort has been required to arrive at the proposals in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Msps Not Standing Or Not Returned in the 2003
    SESSION 1 MSPS NOT STANDING OR NOT Scottish RETURNED IN THE 2003 ELECTION Parliament Fact sheet A number of MSPs did not return to the Scottish Parliament in Session 2. They either did not stand for re-election or they stood as a candidate but were not re-elected. MSPs: Historical This fact sheets is divided into two sections. The first section lists Series those MSPs who stood for re-election but failed to win a seat. The second section lists those MSPs who were serving at the end of the 25 October 2005 first parliamentary session (31 March 2003) but chose not to stand for re-election. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party 1 MSPs that stood for re-election but failed to win a seat Brian Fitzpatrick Lab Strathkelvin & Bearsden Kenny Gibson SNP Glasgow Rhoda Grant Lab Highlands & Islands Iain Gray Lab Edinburgh Pentlands Keith Harding Con Mid Scotland & Fife John McAllion Lab Dundee East Irene McGugan SNP North East Scotland Lyndsay McIntosh Con Central Scotland Angus Mackay Lab Edinburgh South Fiona McLeod SNP West of Scotland Gil Paterson SNP Central Scotland Lloyd Quinan SNP West of Scotland Michael Russell SNP South of Scotland Dr Richard Simpson Lab Ochil Elaine Thomson Lab Aberdeen North Andrew Wilson SNP Central Scotland MSPs that did not stand for re-election Name Party Constituency or Region Colin Campbell SNP West of Scotland Dorothy-Grace Elder Ind Glasgow Dr Winnie Ewing SNP Highlands & Islands Duncan Hamilton SNP Highlands & Islands Ian Jenkins LD Tweeddale, Ettrick & Lauderdale Rt Hon Henry McLeish Lab Central Fife Rt Hon Sir David Steel KBE LD Lothians Kay Ullrich SNP West of Scotland Ben Wallace Con North East Scotland John Young OBE Con West of Scotland Scottish Parliament Fact sheet 2 Contacting the Public Information Service For more information you can visit our website at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk or contact the Public Information Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament Disqualified Since 1900 This Document Provides Information About Members of Parliament Who Have Been Disqu
    Members of Parliament Disqualified since 1900 This document provides information about Members of Parliament who have been disqualified since 1900. It is impossible to provide an entirely exhaustive list, as in many cases, the disqualification of a Member is not directly recorded in the Journal. For example, in the case of Members being appointed 5 to an office of profit under the Crown, it has only recently become practice to record the appointment of a Member to such an office in the Journal. Prior to this, disqualification can only be inferred from the writ moved for the resulting by-election. It is possible that in some circumstances, an election could have occurred before the writ was moved, in which case there would be no record from which to infer the disqualification, however this is likely to have been a rare occurrence. This list is based on 10 the writs issued following disqualification and the reason given, such as appointments to an office of profit under the Crown; appointments to judicial office; election court rulings and expulsion. Appointment of a Member to an office of profit under the Crown in the Chiltern Hundreds or the Manor of Northstead is a device used to allow Members to resign their seats, as it is not possible to simply resign as a Member of Parliament, once elected. This is by far the most common means of 15 disqualification. There are a number of Members disqualified in the early part of the twentieth century for taking up Ministerial Office. Until the passage of the Re-Election of Ministers Act 1919, Members appointed to Ministerial Offices were disqualified and had to seek re-election.
    [Show full text]