DOCSLIB.ORG

The Word of God

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Word of God The Word of God REASONS THE KJV IS SUPERIOR Outstanding Credentials of the KJV's Translators Alexander McClure and Gustafus Paine have both written excellent biographies of the men who translated the King James Bible. These biographies document the fact that the KJV translators were scholarly and godly men. They lived separated lives and they were orthodox in doctrine. And all of them showed reverence for the divine authorship of God's Word and God's promise to preserve His Word. The King James Bible was translated by men like Lancelot Andrews who wrote Greek devotionals. Lancelot Andrews was an Oriental language expert. He was conversant in fifteen languages. Most new version translators have had only a couple years of Greek, a couple years of Hebrew and might have taken Spanish or French in high school. Lancelot Andrews was conversant in fifteen languages. Another great man who translated the King James Bible was William Bedwell. Bedwell was an Arabic scholar. He revived the Arabic language. It was about to die, and he literally revived it. William Bedwell wrote an Arabic to English Lexicon. A lexicon is a dictionary that will give the Arabic word and its definition in English. A Greek Lexicon gives the Greek word and its definition in English. William Bedwell wrote the Arabic Lexicon that is still in use today. Go to the library and if they happen to have an Arabic Lexicon it will probably be the one that William Bedwell wrote. Miles Smith also helped to translate the King James Bible. However, he is better known as the man who translated all the writings of the church fathers into English. Most of the English translations of the church fathers which are still in print today are the translation of Miles Smith. If he was able to translate the church fathers correctly, and the liberals don't have to rewrite that, it should be a safe assumption that he also translated the King James Bible correctly. John Boyce was a translator of the King James Bible. At the age of five, he could read the entire Hebrew Bible. At the age of six, he was considered a Hebrew scholar and was teaching the Hebrew language to adults. These are only a few of the men who translated the King James Bible. Not some guys who had two years of Hebrew and/or Greek at a liberal seminary, but qualified men who wrote lexicons and who taught Hebrew at the age of six. KJV Translators Were Better Acquainted With Biblical Languages In the time of the King James Version the Greek, Oriental, and Hebrew languages were studied with intensity. In our day, Greek, Oriental and Hebrew languages are something that you take one or two semesters of in college. Not only were the men who translated the KJV closer to the languages than we are, they lived in the time when there was an intensive study of the languages that just does not exist today. In the time of the King James translators, they wrote the lexicons for ancient languages. In our day, we use many of the lexicons that they wrote. New Versions Translated By Wicked Men The new versions had men like Westcott and Hort, who wrote the eclectic Greek text, which was published by McMillan in 1881. They also headed up the translation committee of the first "modern" English version, the English Revised Version. Westcott and Hort were involved in the occult. They were warlocks. They founded the Ghostly Guild. They believed that the first few chapters of Genesis and the entire book of Revelation were a fairy tale. Westcott and Hort were even spokesmen for beer advertisements in England. These are the fathers of modern Bible translations. The textbook that has taught all modern version translators how to approach the Bible has been Introduction to the New Testament by guess who? The two beer advertising, Satan worshiping, communicating with the dead, you guessed it: Westcott and Hort. Liberal professors, who didn't believe the book they were translating. If the modern translator did not cut his teeth with Westcott and Hort's, Introduction To The New Testament, they did so by reading another book that was written by others who hold to the same philosophy and who are basically rehashing the same book. The first of the modern translations to be counted as credible in evangelical and fundamental circles was the J.B. Phillips translation. J.B. Phillips used to sit on his couch at night, in his living room, and talk to the dead ghost of C.S. Lewis. The dead C.S. Lewis sat on J.B. Philips' couch and told him what to put in the Phillips' translation. Well, that has to be a good translation, with a godly man like C.S. Lewis coming back from the dead to help him in the translation effort. These are the kind of yo-yo's who translate the modern Bibles. Kenneth Taylor, the translator of the Living Bible had such a foul mouth that the publishers had to rewrite the Living Bible before they could print it because of all of the profanity in it. New Versions Translated By Cultists and Heretics The new versions are often translated by lost men. If they claim to be Christian, they are ecumenical, Catholic, Charismatic, Cambellite, Millerite or some other kind of "ite." Most of them believe very weak if not totally erroneous doctrine and very few of them are ever committed to the doctrines of the inspiration and the preservation of Scripture. Even if they claim to believe in the inspiration of Scripture, they do not believe that God literally dictated every word of the Bible. Instead, they believe that in superintendence God probably oversaw the process but He did not give the Apostles and prophets each individual word. If you look at the listing of the translators for the new versions you will find Catholics on the board of editors. You will also find Pentecostals, Charismatics, Campbellites, Church of Christ, Seventh Day Adventists, etc. All of these cultic groups are involved in the translations of the modern versions. As you read the preface to the new versions you will find occult leaders, Catholic leaders, ecumenical leaders, apostate Methodist leaders, every kind of leader under the sun. These are the people who translate modern so-called Bibles. Popular New Version Translated By Queers One of the primary English "stylists" of the NIV was Virginia Mollenkott. Virginia Molenkott has been a known lesbian since 1962. Virginia Mollenkott was sent, in her own words, "swatches" of texts, often whole books at a time, so that she could approve and finalize word choices. She was a lesbian. When Zondervan and the United Bible Society, the publishers and copyright holders of the New International Version were questioned about why Virginia Mollenkott, a known lesbian, was on the the translation team they said that they did not know she was a lesbian until after they had already printed the NIV. Well, that is not exactly true because in 1962 she officially came out of the closet. She was teaching at a state university on the east coast in 1962 and started a group for lesbian students on the campus. She served as a faculty sponsor for the group and was actively involved in it. She had publicly declared herself to be a lesbian. But just in case the folks at Zondervan and the United Bible Society didn't know about that, it is a matter of record that in 1978 the late Dr. Bob Jones Jr., then president of Bob Jones University in Greensville, South Carolina, sent a letter to Zondervan and the United Bible Society in which he informed them that Virginia Mollenkott had taught language at Bob Jones University in the 1950's and was dismissed for attempting to seduce their female students into lesbian affairs. So they received a letter from the president of a large Christian university telling them that she was a lesbian and they ignored that letter. Then, they tell us these years later that they did not know she was a lesbian until after they had already printed the NIV. Information exists from Mr. Michael Penfold in the UK which gives detailed documentation regarding Dr. Martin H. Woudstra who was the chairman of the NIV's Old Testament Committee. It has now come to light that Dr. Woudstra was also queer. For the sake of fairness, this information has surfaced after Dr. Woudstra's death, so it is possible that the UBS and Zondervan did not know that he was a queer. With a queer Old Testament Translation Committee chairman (Dr. Woudstra) overseeing the translation effort, and, a queer English language "stylist" (Ms. Mollenkott) finalizing the word choices, it is no wonder that the words "sodomy" and "sodomite" have been removed from the NIV. Some New Version Translators Used A Nazi Lexicon Some of the New Versions were translated by using Kittle's Lexicon of New Testament Words. Mr. Kittle was a Nazi and he was a member of Hitler's cabinet. Mr. Kittle's job was to produce a translation of the Bible that would convince German Lutherans to send German Jews to the gas chamber. Since the NIV translators and other new version translators relied on Kittle's lexicon to determine word choices in their versions, and since they relied almost exclusively upon Kittle's lexicon, one could follow the stream of logic to its ultimate conclusion and say that the NIV and other new versions are Nazi Bibles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • İlahiyat Fakültesinin İlmi Dergisi- 18-19. Sayı 2013 44 EDMUND
    İlahiyat Fakültesinin İlmi Dergisi- 18-19. Sayı 2013 Oş Devlet Ünıversitesi Ош мамлекеттик университети İlahiyat Fakültesi İlmi Dergisi Теология факультетинин илимий журналы 18-19. sayı 2013 18-19-саны 2013 EDMUND CASTELL’IN HEPTAGLOT SÖZLÜĞÜ ÖRNEĞİNDE ARAPÇA’NIN ÇOK DİLLİ SÖZLÜK GELENEĞİNDEKİ YERİ Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ömer ACAR* Arabic And It’s Place In The Tradition of Multilingual Lexicography In Case of Edmund Castell’s Lexicon Heptaglotton Abstract This study outlines the place of Arabic in the tradition of multilangual dictionary. Especially the levels of the Arabic language dictionary writing that an important part of Arabic studies which in center of European orientalist studies and E. Castell`s voluminous work is the basis of this study. Initially, most of the commercial and economic concerns, multilingual dictionaries prepared in the form of word lists developed important services, especially in the field of translation. The word lists of the Sumer-Babil-Asur languages are considered as ancestor of multilingual dictionaries. As a member of this family Arabic language has an important condition in this area. Keywords: Edmund Castell, Multilingual Dictionaries, Polyglot, Arabic, Word Lists. Önsöz Bu çalışma, Arapçanın çok dilli sözlük geleneği içindeki yerini ana hatlarıyla ele almaktadır. Özellikle Avrupa’da oryantalist çalışmaların merkezinde yer alan Arap dili araştırmalarında önemli bir yere sahip sözlük yazımının geçirdiği merhaleler ve bu alanda türünün ilk örneği kabul edilen E. Castell’a ait Lexicon Heptaglotton adlı hacimli
    [Show full text]
  • THE KING JAMES VERSION of the BIBLE Preface the Bible Is God's Inspired and Infallible Word – It Is God's Book
    THE KING JAMES VERSION OF THE BIBLE Preface The Bible is God's inspired and infallible Word – it is God's Book. God has given this Book to His people to teach them the Truth that they must believe and the godly life that they must live. Without the Holy Scriptures the believer has no standard of what is the Truth and what is the lie, what is righteous and what is wicked. It is, therefore, imperative that everyone takes great care that the Bible version that he uses, defends, and promotes in the world is a faithful translation of the Word of God. On this point, however, there is much confusion. There are many versions available today and they are all promoted as the best, the most accurate or the easiest to understand. All of them are justified by the supposed inferiority of the King James Version. The truth is quite different. The King James Version, although it is 400 years old, is still the best translation available today. It was translated by men who were both intellectually and spiritually qualified for the work The great version that they produced is faithful to the originals, accurate, incomparable in its style, and easily understood by all those who are serious about knowing God's Word. The King James Version of the Bible is the version to be used in our churches and in our homes. The Inception Of The New Version: A Puritan's Petition – Representatives of the Church of England were gathered together for a conference in January 1604.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Version That Shaped European Scholarship on the Arabic Bible
    Collectanea Christiana Orientalia 18 (2021): 237-259 Vevian Zaki Cataloger of Arabic Manuscripts Hill Museum and Manuscript Library Visiting Researcher Faculty of History University of Oxford The “Egyptian Vulgate” in Europe: An Investigation into the Version that Shaped European Scholarship on the Arabic Bible Introduction In the years from 1818 to 1821, August Scholz (1792–1852), a Catholic orientalist and biblical scholar, made many journeys to libraries across Europe seeking New Testament (NT) manuscripts. He wrote an account of his travels in his book Biblisch-kritische Reise, and in this book, Scholz wrote about all the NT manuscripts he encountered in each library he visited, whether they were in Greek, Latin, Syriac, or Arabic.1 What attracts the attention when it comes to the Arabic NT manuscripts is that he always compared their texts to the text of the printed edition of Erpenius.2 This edition of the Arabic NT was prepared in 1616 by Thomas Erpenius (1584-1624), the professor of Arabic studies at Leiden University—that is, two centuries before the time of Scholz. It was the first full Arabic NT to be printed in Europe, and its text was taken from Near Eastern manuscripts that will be discussed below. Those manuscripts which received particular attention from Scholz were those, such as MS Vatican, BAV, Ar. 13, whose text was rather different from that of Erpenius’s edition.3 1 Johann Martin Augustin Scholz, Biblisch-Kritische Reise in Frankreich, der Schweiz, Italien, Palästina und im Archipel in den Jahren 1818, 1819, 1820, 1821 (Leipzig: Fleischer, 1823). 2 Thomas Erpenius, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WORD in PRINT: Does the King James Bible Have a Future?
    The Twenty-sixth ERIC SYMES ABBOTT Memorial Lecture THE WORD IN PRINT: Does the King James Bible Have a Future? delivered by The Rt Revd & Rt Hon Dr Richard Chartres KCVO Bishop of London at Westminster Abbey on Thursday 26 May 2011 and at Keble College, Oxford on Friday 27 May 2011 The Twenty-sixth ERIC SYMES ABBOTT Memorial Lecture THE WORD IN PRINT: Does the King James Bible Have a Future? delivered by The Rt Revd & Rt Hon Dr Richard Chartres KCVO Bishop of London at Westminster Abbey on Thursday 26 May 2011 and at Keble College, Oxford on Friday 27 May 2011 The Eric Symes Abbott Memorial Fund was endowed by friends of Eric Abbott to provide for an annual lecture or course of lectures on spirituality. The lecture is usually given in May on consecutive evenings in London and Oxford. The members of the Committee are: the Dean of King’s College London (Chairman); the Dean of Westminster; the Warden of Keble College, Oxford; the Reverend John Robson; the Reverend Canon Eric James; and the Right Reverend the Lord Harries of Pentregarth. This Lecture is the twenty-sixth in the series, and details of previous lectures may be found overleaf. Booklets of most – although not all – of these lectures are available from the Dean’s Office at King’s College London (contact details as below), priced at 50p per booklet plus 50p postage and packing. Please specify the year, the lecture number, and the lecturer when requesting booklets. Lecture texts for about half the lectures are also available on the Westminster Abbey website (with the intention to have them all available in due course).
    [Show full text]
  • Westcott and Hort
    The Bible’s First Question “YEA, HATH GOD SAID?” (Satan’s question) Genesis 3:1 1 The Bible’s 2nd Question “WHERE ART THOU?” (God’s question) Genesis 3:9 2 Psalm 11:3—Key Verse “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3) The FOUNDATION of ALL DOCTRINE is the BIBLE. Having the RIGHT BIBLE is critically IMPORTANT!! 3 600 Years of English Bible Versions Years Bibles & N.T’s Years Between Undated 1+6 = 7 --------- 1300's 3+1 = 4 25 years 1400's 0+0 = 0 100 years 1500's 11+20 = 31 3.2 years 1600's 5+3 = 8 12.5 years 1700's 17+29 = 46 2.1 years 1800's 45+90 = 135 .74 years 1900's 53+144 = 197 .51 years __________________________________________________ 1300's--1900's 135+293 = 428 1.4 years 4 CHAPTER I God’s Words Kept Intact Is BIBLE PRESERVATION (The Bible’s Timelessness) 5 Verses on Bible Preservation 1. Psalm 12:6-7: “The WORDS of the LORD are pure WORDS: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt KEEP THEM, O LORD, Thou shalt PRESERVE them from this generation FOR EVER.” 2. Psalm 105:8: “He hath remembered His covenant FOR EVER, the WORD which He commanded TO A THOUSAND GENERA- TIONS.” 6 Verses on Bible Preservation 3. Proverbs 22:20-21. “(20) Have not I WRITTEN to thee excellent things in counsels and knowledge, (21) That I might make thee know the CERTAINTY of the WORDS OF TRUTH; that thou mightest answer the WORDS OF TRUTH to them that send unto thee?” 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the 400Th Anniversary of the King James Bible
    CHRISTIAN Issue 100 HISTORY Celebrating the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible Read how the pet project of an intellectual king became, against all odds, the most beloved English book Did you know? Three KJV myths First, the KJV was not translated personally by King James I, though he did pride himself on his biblical scholarship and “as a young man and a good Protestant Scot had made his own metrical versions of thirty of the Psalms, and of the Book of Revelation.” And he doubtless appreciated the effusive two-page dedication that appeared in the front of every printed copy of the Bible. Second, although the British have since the early 1800s called the KJV “the Authorized Version,” the KJV was never authorized. The term “Authorized Version” is more aptly used of the Great Bible of 1539, prepared by Myles Coverdale, which Henry VIII in 1541 and 1547 (and Elizabeth I in 1559) commanded to be read in churches, under threat of penalty for those omitting to do so. No such proclamations from either king or bishops prescribed the use of the King James Version. Third, and also contrary to popular belief, “this version was not universally loved from the moment it appeared. Far from it. As a publication in the seventeenth century it was undoubtedly successful: it was heavily used, and it rapidly saw off its chief rival, the three Geneva Bibles. But for its first 150 years, the KJV received a barrage of criticism.” (See “No overnight success,” p. 22.) Source: David Daniell, The Bible in English: Its History and Influence (2003) The “funny” version? “The prose style of the King James Version lends itself well to parody.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Around the World Mind
    A journey around th e world mind CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Sir Giles Gilbert Scott’s design for the East Elevation of the University Library Over the course of six centuries the So while we conserve this unique University Library’s collections have cultural heritage for the future, we are grown from a few dozen volumes on a simultaneously finding new ways to handful of subjects into an extraordinary share it with the present generation by accumulation of several million books, building a digital library. Anyone with an maps, manuscripts and journals, internet connection and a desire for augmented by an ever-increasing range knowledge can view letters written by of electronic resources. They cover every Moses Maimonides, Newton’s autograph conceivable aspect of human propositions on elliptic motion, or endeavour, across three thousand years sketchbooks from Darwin’s voyage of and in over two thousand languages. the Beagle . Through the digital library, From its beginnings as an asset for a tiny communities of readers around the Anne Jarvis community of theologians and canon globe can help create a richer University Librarian lawyers in the medieval university, the understanding of the material held in Library’s mission has expanded to serve our care. the international scholarly community and now, through its digitisation Great collections are brought to life by projects, to reach new audiences across great people – students and scholars, the world. and visitors to the Library past, present and future. We hope this book brings The Library keeps evolving. In recent the Library to you wherever you are, and years we have been given the we welcome those of you who visit us in magnificent Montaigne Library of Cambridge and those who join us in a Gilbert de Botton and purchased the virtual journey around the world mind.
    [Show full text]
  • MAJOR KING JAMES BIBLE TRANSLATORS Class Session 7B A
    MAJOR KING JAMES BIBLE TRANSLATORS Class Session 7b A. Dr. Lancelot Andrews. 1. He was the president and director of the Westminster group that translated twelve books, altogether (Genesis to 2 Kings). The task of Company One. 2. He studied most of the modern languages and devoted himself chiefly to the Oriental languages, being educated at the University of Cambridge. 3. His manual for his private devotions was prepared by himself and written wholly in the Greek language. 4. "In his funeral sermon by Dr. Buckeridge, Bishop of Rochester, it is said that Dr. Andrews was conversant with FIFTEEN LANGUAGES. Certainly, he was a respected and superior translator." I don't know any of these modern translators of the ASV, NASV, NEV, NIV, Living Letters, or paraphrases who are conversant with as many as fifteen (15) languages. B. Dr. William Bedwell was also in Company One, the Westminster Group translating Genesis through 2 Kings from Hebrew into English. 1. He had the reputation as being "an eminent Oriental scholar." 2. His fame for Arabic learning was so great that scholars sought him out for assistance. Another stated concerning him: "The honor of being the first who considerably promoted and revived the study of the Arabic language and literature in Europe." 3. In Antwerp, Germany, in 1612, he published in quarto an Edition of the Epistles of St. John in Arabic with a Latin version. I don't know anything about Arabic, but to have an edition of 1, 2, 3 John with Latin and Arabic would take a tremendously skilled and capable scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • Anton Deusing (1612-1666) and His Persian and Turkish Dictionaries1
    AN UNSUNG HERO OF ORIENTAL STUDIES IN LEIDEN: ANTON DEUSING (1612-1666) AND HIS PERSIAN AND TURKISH DICTIONARIES1 NIL Ö. PALABIYIK Abstract The article brings to life the now forgotten Deusing, a protégé of Golius in 1630s in Leiden who made substantial contributions to the study of oriental languages in Western Europe. He was influential in putting together the expanded edition of Erpenius’s Arabic grammar and the publication of the first Persian grammar in Europe. Yet his most endur- ing and profound legacy lies in the Turkish and Persian dictionaries he compiled, which, this piece argues, formed the basis of Golius’s dictionaries. Keywords: Oriental studies, Turkish, Persian, Thomas Erpenius, Jacobus Golius It is not uncommon that modern historiography obscures illustrious scholars of the past and reduces them to footnotes, when they were, in fact, pivotal players within their intellectual milieu. Anton Deusing (1612-1666) is one such elusive figure, whose name is hardly ever mentioned today among those who advanced the study of oriental languages in early modern Europe.2 Deusing read medicine in Leiden between 1630 and 1637, and resided in the house of the celebrated orientalist Jacobus Golius (1596-1667) along with other promising young men who took private lessons from him.3 Deusing learned Arabic from Golius and was given access to his teacher’s extensive library of oriental manuscripts, the majority of which were collected in the Ottoman Empire during Golius’s stay there. The evidence from Deusing’s personal library suggests that Golius tasked him with copying, compiling and translating oriental texts from his own and the Univesity library.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authorised Version: a Wonderful and Unfinished History A124 ISBN 978-1-86228-049-6
    THE AUTHORISED VERSION U A Wonderful and Unfinished History C. P. HALLIHAN THE AUTHORISED VERSION: U A Wonderful and Unfinished History C. P. HALLIHAN Trinitarian Bible Society London, England The Authorised Version: A Wonderful and Unfinished History A124 ISBN 978-1-86228-049-6 © 2010 Trinitarian Bible Society Tyndale House, Dorset Road, London, SW19 3NN, UK 10M//1 CONTENTS PAGE 1 Timeline PAGE 9 Chapter 1: General Introduction The Manuscripts: Handwritten Scriptures PAGE 20 Chapter 2: John Wycliffe and the English Bible PAGE 26 Chapter 3: Technology, Scholarship and Martyrdom: The Printed English Bible PAGE 39 Chapter 4: On to Hampton Court PAGE 52 Chapter 5: Printing: Techniques and Problems PAGE 58 Chapter 6: The Last Chapter? APPENDICES: PAGE 68 Appendix 1: 1604 DIRECTIVES PAGE 70 Appendix 2: THE ‘PRESENTATION’ OF THE BIBLE PAGE 73 Appendix 3: WHY THE DIVERSION OF RESOURCES? PAGE 74 Appendix 4: THE COMMITTEE MEN Z TIMELINE c. 405 Jerome’s Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible is produced and in wide circulation. 500 Portions of the Scriptures in five hundred languages available by this time. 1066 William the Conqueror invades England. 1388 Wycliffe’s first translation of the entire Bible into English, based on the Latin Vulgate, is published. 1453 Gutenberg invents the printing press. The first book printed is the Bible in Latin—the Gutenberg Bible. 1477-1487 First printed Hebrew Scripture portions. 1483 The Golden Legend, Jacobus de Voragine’s ‘life of the saints’, compiled in the mid-13th century, is printed in English by ‘Wyllyam Caxton’. It contains a literal translation of a large portion of the Bible, all of the Pentateuch, and much of the Gospels.
    [Show full text]
  • Polemical Transfers Wiegers, GA
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Polemical Transfers Wiegers, G.A. Published in: After Conversion DOI: 10.1163/9789004324329_010 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Wiegers, G. A. (2016). Polemical Transfers: Iberian Muslim Polemics and Their Impact in Northern Europe in the Seventeenth Century. In M. García-Arenal (Ed.), After Conversion: Iberia and the emergence of modernity (pp. 229-248). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004324329_010 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) Download date: 01 Jun 2019 Polemical Transfers 229 Chapter 8 Polemical Transfers: Iberian Muslim Polemics and Their Impact in Northern Europe in the Seventeenth Century1 Gerard A. Wiegers Introduction Between 1609 and 1614 the young Dutch scholar of Oriental languages, Thomas Erpenius (1584–1624), paid educational visits to various European countries.2 Having been awarded his master’s degree in the Liberal Arts (magister artium liberalium) in 1608 at the University of Leiden, at which he studied under such professors as Josephus Justus Scaliger (1540–1609), Erpenius’ plan was to make the acquaintance of important theologians and Oriental scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • E:\Documents and Settings\Todd W. White\My Documents\Wpdocs
    SOUTH HEIGHTS BAPTIST’S WEEKLY Volume XVII July 10, 2011 Number 27 PLAN NOW TO COME AND HEAR GREAT GOSPEL BLUEGRASS MUSIC PRESENTED BY - THE GRUBB FAMILY from Collinsville, Texas SATURDAY EVENING, JULY 16 th at 7:00 p.m. Free Ice Cream Afterwards! and SUNDAY MORNING, JULY 17 th at 11:00 a.m. INVITE YOUR FRIENDS TO COME ENJOY SOME OLD-FASHIONED GOSPEL MUSIC AND FELLOWSHIP! (There Is No Charge, But A Love Offering For The Grubb Family Will Be Taken.) Oriental tongues. Dr. Andrews is said to have been completely Textual Criticism Fact fluent in fifteen languages, and had his private devotions in the and Fiction Greek New Testament, and kept a journal of his devotions written A fresh look at Bible Inspiration entirely in Greek. Preservation And Translation ‘‘‘ Dr. William Bedwell was also selected to work on the Old by Dr. Thomas Cassidy, Pastor - First Baptist Testament at Westminster, working on the same books as Dr. Church of Spring Valley, California (Conclusion) Andrews. Dr. Bedwell was not only fluent in Hebrew and other Oriental languages, but produced a translation of the Epistles of Section Four - The Translators John in Arabic and Latin. He also wrote an entire Arabic dictionary by himself! At the time of his death Dr. Bedwell was The King James Bible was not translated by any one man, or working on a Persian dictionary which is still in the Bodlian even by one group of men, but by six groups, or committees, Library at Oxford. Dr. Bedwell's knowledge of the Shemitic and meeting in the cities of Cambridge, Westminster, and Oxford, Cognate languages of Hebrew, Persian, Arabic, Syriac, Aramaic, England.
    [Show full text]