BJCP Style Guidelines for Beer, Mead, & Cider 2008 Edition Copyright © 2008, Beer Judge Certification Program, Inc. Updates available at www.bjcp.org Acknowledgements Copyright and Usage This is the latest in a series of documents describ- The entire contents of the BJCP Style Guidelines ing beer, mead, and cider styles, going back at are copyright © 2008, by the copyright owner, the least to the early 1980s. The first formal set of BJCP BJCP (formally known as the Beer Judge Certifica- style guidelines, produced in 1997, were derived tion Program, Inc.). from the New England Homebrew Guidelines, The most current version of the guidelines can al- and were primarily authored by Steve Stroud, Pat ways be found on the BJCP website, www.bjcp.org. Baker and Betty Ann Sather. Mead guidelines were added to the 1997 Guidelines based on the The BJCP grants the right to make a limited num- work of a committee comprised of Tom Fitz- ber of copies of the guidelines for the following patrick, Steve Dempsey, Michael Hall, Dan purposes: McConnell, Ken Schramm, Ted Major and John • Use by organizers and judges in BJCP- Carlson. sanctioned competitions The 1997 guidelines were revised and extended in 1998-99 by a committee consisting of Bruce Brode, • Use in educational judge training programs Steve Casselman, Tim Dawson, Peter Garofalo, All other rights are reserved by the BJCP. Requests Bryan Gros, Bob Hall, David Houseman, Al Kor- relating to usage of the guidelines for any purpose zonas, Martin Lodahl, Craig Pepin, and Bob not outlined above should be sent by email to Rogers. [email protected] for review. The guidelines were substantially revised and ex- tended in 2003-04 by a committee consisting of Gordon Strong (Chairman), Ron Bach, Peter Ga- What is the BJCP? rofalo, Michael L. Hall, Dave Houseman, and The Beer Judge Certification Program, Inc., known Mark Tumarkin. They were aided by contribu- everywhere as the BJCP, is a nonprofit organiza- tions from Jeff Sparrow, Alan McKay, Steve tion whose purpose is to promote beer literacy and Hamburg, Roger Deschner, Ben Jankowski, Jeff the appreciation of real beer, and to recognize beer Renner, Randy Mosher, Phil Sides, Jr., Dick tasting and evaluation skills. We certify and rank Dunn, Joel Plutchak, A.J. Zanyk, Joe Workman, beer judges through an examination and monitor- Dave Sapsis, Ed Westemeier, and Ken Schramm. ing process. Additional revisions have been made in the 2008 The BJCP was founded in 1985. As of early 2008 version based on research conducted by Gordon when this edition was published, we have admin- Strong, along with Jamil Zainasheff, Kristen Eng- istered the Beer Judge Examination to over 4,500 land, Stan Hieronymus, Tom Fitzpatrick, and individuals worldwide. Over 2,500 are active George DePiro. members in 8 countries, and have judged well over 400,000 beers. Learn more at www.bjcp.org. i DEDICATION This edition of the BJCP Style Guidelines is dedicated to the memory of Michael Jackson 1942 – 2007 "A man is remembered for the lives he touches and the works he leaves. Michael Jackson was the most influential authority on beer the world has ever known. He has inspired generations of beer judges with his passion, knowledge and gifted prose. His books remain definitive references on beer styles and will forever be found on the bookshelves of anyone serious about beer. But he will be re- membered most for living his life on his own terms, doing what he wanted to do in a way that left onlookers feeling a mixture of awe, envy and amazement. Sleep well, Son of Yorkshire and Bard of Beer, you will be missed." Gordon Strong President, Beer Judge Certification Program ii Preface to the Notes to Brewers: Some styles require additional information to help BJCP Style Guidelines judges evaluate your beer. Read the Guidelines carefully and provide the required information. Omitting required information will likely result in Notes to All: a misjudged beer. The style categories have been extensively revised from previous editions of the Style Guidelines. In If you enter a specialty or experimental beer not some cases, style parameters, descriptions, and identified in the Guidelines, or use unusual ingre- well-known commercial examples have been dients, please consider providing supplemental changed. Categories have been renumbered, reor- information so the judges can properly understand dered and recategorized. Please double-check the your beer and intent. Guidelines to ensure the style number matches the name you are referencing. Notes to Organizers: Beer Color Descriptions Please ensure that supplemental information sub- Note that SRM is a measure of beer color density mitted by brewers is available to the judges. more than hue/tint. Keep this in mind when at- tempting to use only SRM numbers when describ- If brewers omit required information, please seek ing beers. Within these Guidelines, beer color de- clarification from the brewers before the competi- scriptors generally follow this mapping to SRM tion date. values: You are free to group style categories and sub- Straw.................................................................... 2-3 categories in whatever logical groupings you wish for the purpose of your competition, taking into Yellow.................................................................. 3-4 account the number of entries and available judges. Gold .....................................................................5-6 You are free to split and regroup style categories Amber................................................................. 6-9 for the purpose of your competition, if you feel that a different grouping would be beneficial to Deep amber/light copper................................. 10-14 your entrants. You are not constrained to keep all sub-categories within a major category together Copper................................................................. 14-17 when constructing flights. Deep copper/light brown................................ 17-18 Brown.................................................................. 19-22 Dark Brown........................................................ 22-30 Very Dark Brown.............................................. 30-35 Black.................................................................... 30+ Black, opaque.................................................... 40+ iii Notes to Judges: overly penalize the brewer for missing informa- tion; it might not be his fault. Do the best you can Understand that most beer styles are not defined and use common sense. by a single beer. Many styles are quite broad and can encompass multiple stylistically accurate vari- If you come across a beer that is clearly out of ants. Do not let your understanding of a single style, check with the organizer to make sure the beer limit your appreciation of the full range of entry has been properly labeled and/or catego- each beer style. rized. Handling errors do occur. You are free to judge beers in a flight in whatever order makes sense to you, although you should try to sequence the beers in a manner that allows you to preserve your senses and to fairly evaluate each beer. Pay careful attention to the modifiers used in de- scribing the styles. Look for guidance on the mag- nitude and quality of each characteristic. Notice that many characteristics are optional; beers not evidencing these non-required elements should not be marked down. Phrases such as “may have,” “can contain,” “might feature,” “is acceptable,” “is appropriate,” “is typical,” etc. all indicate optional elements. Required elements are generally written as de- claratory phrases, or use words such as “must” or “should.” Elements that must not be present often use phrases such as “is inappropriate,” “no,” or “must not.” Seek to understand the intent of the style catego- ries and to judge each beer in its entirety. Don’t overly focus on single elements. Look to the over- all balance and character of the beer for your final opinion. If a style guideline calls for required information from the brewer but this information has not been provided to you, please request it from the compe- tition organizer. If the organizer does not have the information, then make a quick evaluation and decide how you wish to categorize the entry. Make note of it on your scoresheet and then judge it as such. It may not always be accurate, but it’s the best you can do under the circumstances. Do not iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 8. ENGLISH PALE ALE........................................ 14 Acknowledgements .......................................................i 8A. Standard/Ordinary Bitter......................................... 14 8B. Special/Best/Premium Bitter................................... 15 Copyright and Usage .................................................... i 8C. Extra Special/Strong Bitter (English Pale Ale) ....... 15 Dedication.................................................................... ii Preface to the BJCP Style Guidelines......................... iii 9. SCOTTISH AND IRISH ALE......................... 16 Notes to All................................................................... iii 9A. Scottish Light 60/-.................................................. 16 Notes to Brewers......................................................... iii 9B. Scottish Heavy 70/-................................................ 16 Notes to Organizers .....................................................iii 9C. Scottish Export 80/-............................................... 16 Notes