Harlow Klimple Crown Hill
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Meets Special Condition S6 of NPDES Permit
King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Wastewater Treatment Division King Street Center, KSC-NR-0500 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 February 27, 2018 Biniam Zelelow Washington State Department of Ecology 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 Transmittal of King County Industrial Waste Program's 2017 Annual Pretreatment Report Dear Mr. Zelelow: In accordance with Special Condition S6 of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits for the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment Division's treatment plants, I am submitting the 2017 Annual Pretreatment Report. This submittal includes an executive summary and a program narrative for 2017, which provides greater detail on program activities. Please find the narrative portion of the report and a CD containing the appendices enclosed with this letter. In addition, the narrative and appendices will be uploaded to the Permitting and Reporting Information System (PARIS). If you have any questions regarding the Annual Pretreatment Report, please call Industrial Waste Program Manager Mark Henley at 206-263-6994 or email him at [email protected]. Sincerely, ^v ~^'-—' Mark Isaacson Division Director Enclosure ec: Chris Townsend, Section Manager, Environmental and Community Services Section (ECSS), Wastewater Treatment Division (WTD), Department of Natural Resources and Parks (DNRP) Mark Henley, Manager, Industrial Waste Program, ECSS, WTD, DNRP Annual Pretreatment Report 2017 March 2018 Department of Natural Resources and Parks Wastewater Treatment Division Industrial Waste Program For comments or questions, contact: Mark Henley King County Wastewater Treatment Division Industrial Waste Program KSC-NR-0513 201 S. Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 206-263-6994 [email protected] Alternative Formats Available 206-477-5371, TTY Relay: 711 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... -
National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. ___X___ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Seattle’s Olmsted Parks and Boulevards (1903–68) B. Associated Historic Contexts None C. Form Prepared by: name/title: Chrisanne Beckner, MS, and Natalie K. Perrin, MS organization: Historical Research Associates, Inc. (HRA) street & number: 1904 Third Ave., Suite 240 city/state/zip: Seattle, WA 98101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] telephone: (503) 247-1319 date: December 15, 2016 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ ______________________ _________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. -
Shigeru Ban, on Structural Design
Land Use Review Application File Number: FOR INTAKE, STAFF USE ONLY Qtr Sec Map(s) _____________ Zoning ______________ Date Rec _________________by ___________________ Plan District _____________________________________ Type I Type Ix Type II Type IIx Type III Type IV Historic and/or Design District ______________________ LU Reviews _____________________________________ Neighborhood ___________________________________ [Y] [N] Unincorporated MC District Coalition _________________________________ [Y] [N] Flood Hazard Area (LD & PD only) [Y] [N] Potential Landslide Hazard Area (LD & PD only) Business Assoc __________________________________ [Y] [N] 100-year Flood Plain [Y] [N] DOGAMI Related File # ___________________________________ Email this application and supporting documents APPLICANT: Complete all sections below that apply to the proposal. Please print legibly. to: [email protected] Development Site Address or Location ______________________________________________________________________________ Cross Street ________________________________________________Sq. ft./Acreage _______________________ Site tax account number(s) R R R R R R Adjacent property (in same ownership) tax account number(s) R R R Describe project (attach additional page if necessary) Describe proposed stormwater disposal methods Identify requested land use reviews • Design & Historic Reviews - For new development, provide project valuation. $______________________ For renovation, provide exterior alteration value. $______________________ AND -
Landscape Architecture Landscape Architecture
Landscape Architecture Landscape Architecture 1 2 Landscape Architecture AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE OVERALL VISION. We design spaces that are an extension of the built COMMERCIAL OFFICE MID-RISE / MIXED-USE environment, broadening HIGH RISE the connection to nature as PARKS / OPEN SPACES part of the daily experience. PLANTING DESIGN When there is a seamless SUSTAINABLE CERTIFICATION transition from room to STORMWATER MANAGEMENT roof deck, from lobby to MASTER PLANNING streetscape the distinction GREEN ROOFS of these spaces is blurred. SPECIAL PROJECTS PUBLIC MEETING FACILITATION DATA 1 3 4 Featured Services COMMERCIAL OFFICE ..................4–15 MID-RISE / MIXED-USE ............. 16–35 HIGH RISE ................................ 36–57 1 LeMay Sculpture Garden 2 Meet the team Rachael Meyer PLA, GRP, LEED® AP LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PRINCIPAL Rachael has over 15 years experience in commercial, residential, and public projects. She is passionate about green roofs, urban agriculture and sustainable strategies, and integrates these passions into many of her designs. Rachael brings an expertise in integrated design, and elevates projects by maximizing the impact landscapes can have on the urban fabric. Rachael has been a leader in pushing the opportunities for landscape in our urban environment through research and public engagement. She regularly speaks and writes about her research, which ranges from water management practices to living landscapes. Burton K. Yuen LEED® AP BD+C ASSOCIATE, LANDSCAPE DESIGNER Burton is a crucial member of Weber Thompson’s Landscape Architecture Studio with his extensive experience crafting thoughtful and innovative designs. With over 20 years of experience in Idaho and Seattle, he’s worked on a wide variety of project types ranging from high rise towers to office campuses. -
The Regrade, Seattle, WA ABOUT MIDTOWN21
The Regrade, Seattle, WA ABOUT MIDTOWN21 Midtown 21 is a stunning new mixed-use retail and office building designed with beautiful retail space and set in a neighborhood designed for livability. The neighborhood is rapidly evolving and becoming Seattle’s densest and most livable area. With an emphasis on walkability and the ‘live, work, and play’ mindset, the Denny Triangle is a prime target for retailers and restaurants seeking an 18-hour per day customer base. Denny Triangle seamlessly integrates Seattle’s most vibrant neighborhoods as it is at the nexus of the Central Business District, Capitol Hill, South Lake Union and the retail core. Adjacent buildings provide foot traffic from Amazon, HBO, Seattle Children’s, and more. Future adjacent development will include the $1.6B expansion of the Washington State Convention Center, Seattle Children’s Building Cure, as well as Washington’s largest hotel with over 1,200 rooms at 8th and Howell. 5,720 SF of retail divisible 365,000+ SF Class A office Seattle City Light Electrical Substation Nexus 403 units (2019) 1200 Stewart Metropolitan Park 149,309 SF retail Pho Bac MINOR AVE 336,000 SF oce 876 units Market (2019) House Corned Beef Olive Mirabella Retirement Kinects Tower Tower Apartment 366 units (2018) Apt Tilt 49 1901 Minor 307,000 SF oce(2017) + 393 units 737 units (proposed) Convention Convention Center BOREN AVE Hilton Center Expansion Garden Inn Expansion Surface Parking Jars 564,000 sf oce Juice 222 rooms Hill7 (2020) 1800 Terry 270 units (2018) Midtown 21 Building Cure 365,000 SF -
1930 Boren Avenue Trammell Crow | Lmn | Weisman Design Group Early Design Guidance | Sdci Project # 3032054-Eg | July 17, 2018 Table of Contents
1930 BOREN AVENUE TRAMMELL CROW | LMN | WEISMAN DESIGN GROUP EARLY DESIGN GUIDANCE | SDCI PROJECT # 3032054-EG | JULY 17, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES 2.0 SITE PLAN 3.0 URBAN DESIGN ANALYSIS 4.0 ZONING DATA 5.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 6.0 ARCHITECTURAL MASSING CONCEPTS 2 1930 BOREN AVE. I PROJECT # 3032054-EG I EARLY DESIGN GUIDANCE I 07.17.2018 LMN 1.0 DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY SITE CONTEXT #3029383) is directly east of the site and is across the street on Boren Avenue with offi ce, The proposal at 1930 Boren Avenue is an The project site is located within the DMC planned as a mixed use building with a 440 laboratories, research and development to approximately 159 ft. high commercial building. 240/290-440 zone and within the Denny ft tower and 8-story podium directly adjacent accompany the research building currently The site is bounded by Boren Avenue to the Triangle Urban Center Village. The project site to the site and an 8-story “sidecar” hotel over under construction at 1920 Terry Avenue. south, Virginia Street to the west, an alley to is bordered by the DMC 340/290-440 zone to the podium adjacent to Stewart Street. To the the north and a proposed mixed-use building the south of Boren Avenue. north across the alley is 1901 Minor Avenue on a podium to the east. (SDCI# 3019623) a residential building with The Denny Triangle neighborhood is rapidly two 400 ft tall towers on top of an 8-story The project is planning for approximately evolving with several new buildings refl ecting podium. -
2.86-Acres | 124395 Sf
2.86-acres | 124,395 sf REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: unique development opportunity premier seattle land site located in south lake union INVESTMENT CONTACTS: Lori Hill Rob Hielscher Bob Hunt Managing Director Managing Director Managing Director Capital Markets International Capital Public Institutions +1 206 971 7006 +1 415 395 4948 +1 206 607 1754 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 601 Union Street, Suite 2800, Seattle, WA 98101 +1 206 607 1700 jll.com/seattle TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I The Offering 4 Introduction Investment Highlights Site Summary Objectives and Requirements Transaction Guidelines Section II Project Overview & Development Potential 17 South Lake Union Map and Legend Project Overview Zoning Zoning Map seattle Development Considerations Development Potential Section III RFP Process and Requirements 34 Solicitation Schedule Instructions and Contacts RFP Requirements Evaluation Process Post Selection Process Disclosures Section IV Market Characteristics 50 Market Overview Market Comparables Neighborhood Summary Regional Economy Section V Appendices 74 NORTH See page 75-76 for List of Appendix Documents Copyright ©2018 Jones Lang LaSalle. All rights reserved. Although information has been obtained from sources deemed reliable, Owner, Jones Lang LaSalle, and/or their representatives, brokers or agents make no guarantees as to the accuracy of the information contained herein, and offer the property without express or implied warranties of any kind. The property may be withdrawn without notice. If the recipient of this information has signed a confidentiality agreement regarding this matter, this information is subject to the terms of that agreement. Section I THE OFFERING 4 | Mercer Mega Block | Request for Proposals 520 REPLACE MERCER STREET LAKE UNION DEXTER AVE N ROY STREET ROY 99 NORTH Last large undeveloped site in South Lake Union | Mercer Mega Block | Request for Proposals 5 THE OFFERING INTRODUCTION MERCER MEGA BLOCK JLL is pleased to present the Mercer Mega Block, a 2.86-acre site acquisition opportunity. -
1949 Number 13
- . ' _, .... ,:..,, ,'; - ;,. f ' ; -::; -· � :� "' ·- �- ., � . 'f - l'o--: ouh1IF .... ta1nee._ r M· .. J; . f. - ·. ; �- ..,,- ,. {' ,,,.. .. _, , .. "' ' I l t I! 1 9 4 9 The MOUNTAINEER Volume 40 DECEMBER 15, 1949 Number 13 Organized 1906 Incorporated 1913 Editorial Board 1949 MAROLYN SMITH, Editor CAMERON BECKWJTH MARY T. HALEY Proof readers BETTY MANNING ELLEN MYER:; t VALLIE JOHN!;ON Advertising • MARILYN ADAMS JOHN PUTNAM Mailing MRS. IRVING GAVETT Subscription Price, $2.00 a Year Published and Copyrighted by THE MOUNTAINEERS, INC. j Published monthly, January to November, inclusi\·c. and semi-monthly during December by THE l\IOUNTALNEERS, INC., P. 0. Box 122. Seattle 11, Washington Clubroom.s at 521 Pike Str et Entered as Second Class Matter, April 1 , 1922 at Po. toffice at Seattle, \Vashington, under the Act of :\lach 3, 1879 ., I ; I· I Tarteo f Contents PAGE I Mt. Rainier from the West.. .............................. George R. Senner.... 4 The 43rd Summer Outing.................................. Ellen Walrh............ ................... 8 15 Years of Climbing Classes ............................ H arvey Manning.................. ..... 13 2400 Miles from Home...................................... ]ohn Ebert. ........................................ 17 The 1949 Climbers' Outing .............................. R. Safely ............................................ 18 Presenting The Prince and The Pauper. ........... Ellen Walrh ................................ ....... 20 We Had a Hobby Show at the Banqu<.>t.. ..........Elvera -
Upzoning and Value Capture How U.S. Local Governments Use Land
Land Use Policy 95 (2020) 104624 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Land Use Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/landusepol Upzoning and value capture: How U.S. local governments use land use T regulation power to create and capture value from real estate developments Minjee Kim Land Use Planning and Real Estate Development, Florida State University, 336 Bellamy Building, 113 Collegiate Loop, P.O. Box 3062280, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The public sector can harness its authority to control land uses to secure valuable public benefits from real Value capture estate developments. This paper investigates how five major U.S. cities—Boston, Chicago, New York, San Upzoning Francisco, and Seattle—are using their land use regulation powers to create and capture value for the public Zoning negotiations benefit. An analysis of the zoning and entitlement processes of the 20 largest real estate development projects Land use exactions in each city reveals that value has been captured from all 100 projects. Furthermore, these cities implicitly Real estate development differentiated value capture into two distinct components: value creation and value capture. Among the100 projects, cities created value for 90 projects by allowing greater density and height—a practice often referred to as “upzoning.” Distinguishing such upzoning incidences from traditional land use exaction tools is im- portant because the added value gives local governments greater legitimacy in asking for public benefits. The experience of the five cities further revealed that value capture strategies can be customized to adapt tounique regulatory, political, and cultural contexts. Lastly, despite the fact that the majority of the upzoned projects increased density and height through project-specific negotiations, none of the cities had clear standards or evaluation frameworks for determining: how much value was created, what can be asked for in return, and who should benefit from the value captured. -
Pursuing High-Rise Multifamily Energy Efficiency in Seattle
PURSUING HIGH-RISE MULTIFAMILY ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN SEATTLE MAY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2018, over ten thousand residential units were for code compliance was re-purposed to test a number of built or approved to be built in high-rise buildings scenarios employing a range of ECMs needed to design and throughout Downtown Seattle, South Lake Union construct a code-compliant building in each future code cycle. and First Hill.1 There is no question that high-rise multifamily (HRMF) buildings account for a significant Conclusion 1: The results for future code compliance are not percentage of new dwelling units in Seattle. Of as challenging as one might think. This study found that the particular interest to developers, architects, engineers following energy conservation measures (ECMs) resulted in and city officials is how the continued evolution of the anticipated code compliance for Nexus in the year 2030: Seattle Energy Code (SEC), updated every three years, • Electric boilers will impact the near future design and construction of this building type. • Heat pumps for space heating • Heat pump heating for Domestic Hot Water (DHW) To map the progression of SEC compliance between (e.g. sewer thermal) now and the year 2030, this study was executed in two • Building envelope air tightness measures steps. First, we established a baseline and Energy Use • Lighting power density reduction Intensity (EUI) targets for future code cycles. Then, we identified and tested Energy Conservative Measure • Heat-pump clothes dryers (ECM) packages to meet those targets. • Partial heat pump DHW plant • Reduced unit ventilation Nexus, a single prototypical residential tower designed by Weber Thompson (MEP by Rushing) was chosen for • Reduced corridor pressurization this study in order to test the impacts of energy code and efficiency strategies. -
Architecture Firm with a Balance of Strong Design Aesthetics and Pragmatism
Profile & Experience 2020 1 Hello, WE ARE WEBER THOMPSON. 2 Our philosophy at Weber Thompson is quite simple: we seek to understand our client’s vision, to excel at teamwork, and believe that our success is predicated on helping our clients find success with projects that create value for them, their audience and the earth. Vision At the core of our design practice is our commitment to understand each client’s vision and unique criteria for success. This requires exceptional listening skills and a roll-up- your-sleeves attitude. At the launch of every project we employ these tools to pinpoint the central objectives of the project, then create a creative brief that guides the project from design development through construction and on to operations and maintenance if needed. Teamwork Our design process is based on a respect for our clients and each other as valued design team members. Designing and building a project is a group effort that requires clear communication and carefully orchestrated teamwork. Weber Thompson serves as the prime design consultant coordinating between owner, stakeholders, consultants, and contractors to create projects that exceed everyone’s expectations. Value We believe good design has value that is demonstrable: Homes that provide respite, environments that help sell ideas and products, spaces that inspire, structures that complement their surroundings and respond to context, sustainable buildings that bring lasting reward to their owners while sitting lightly on the earth. At Weber Thompson, our success comes from helping our clients find success and value in their projects. 1 2 Firm Leadership Over twenty-eight years ago, two architects struck out on their own. -
Affordable Housinghousing Designdesign Studiostudio
AffordableAffordable HousingHousing DesignDesign StudioStudio 1 Annual Summer Fair at Othello Square 2LIHI Tiny House ABOUT Our Firm Since our founding, Weber Thompson has designed over 10,000 residences in low, mid- and high-rise structures. Every day, people from all walks of life come home to one of our designs. From young to old, individuals to families of all kinds, from those with lower incomes to the affluent, we are proud to serve the full breadth of our community. This work motivates us; it’s sparks our passion to create. We want to make a difference in people’s lives and in the community. For these homes to be successful, every detail matters. We understand the intimate role these spaces play in people’s lives. To that end, we work with providers to meet the needs of their residents, designing homes that support them in their daily lives by providing healthy places; places of safety and respite that are flexible enough to allow for a wide range of living styles, ages, family sizes and configurations. Equally important, and perhaps more difficult to capture, is the level of personal commitment Weber Thompson, and this team in particular, brings to serving our affordable housing clients. Whether it’s organizing a book drive for the Raven Terrace lending library, building a Tiny House for LIHI, or working through a gazillion permutations of the tax credit programs with Bellwether, Weber Thompson approaches affordable housing as part of our mission. We understand how difficult these projects are and how hard our clients work to serve their communities.