DOCSLIB.ORG

Obed Wild and Scenic River National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Obed Wild and Scenic River National Park Place cursor over cells with red By Cumberland Mycological Society, Crossville, TN triangles to view comments Click underlined x's for photo links click on underlined species for web links to details about those species Scientific name common names (if applicable) Sep-13 Jun-14 Edibility Notes* Aleurodiscus wakefieldiae syn. A. oakesii syn. Corticium oakesii "Oak Parchment" "Hop Hornbeam Disc" x inedible Amanita amerifulva [often called 'Amanita fulva' -a European species] “Tawny Grisette” x x edible -with extreme caution!! Amanita amerirubescens "Blusher" x deadly poisonous! Amanita bisporigera = A. virosa sensu auct. amer. (Ref. RET) "Destroying Angel" x x possibly poisonous Amanita brunnescens “Cleft foot-Amanita” x possibly poisonous Amanita citrina sensu auct. amer. "Citron Amanita," "False Death Cap" x possibly poisonous Amanita cf cokeri "Coker's Amanita" x x edible -may be toxic in large amts. Amanita flavoconia “Yellow Patches" x x edible Armillaria mellea syn. Armillariella mellea "Honey Mushroom" x inedible Artomyces pyxidatus syn. Clavicorona pyxidata, syn. Clavaria pyxidata "Crown-tipped Coral" x x edible -with extreme caution!! Austroboletus gracilis var. gracilis syn. Tylopilus gracilis “Graceful Bolete” x x possibly poisonous Baeospora cf myosura syn. Collybia conigena "Conifer-cone Baeospora" x edible (for most) if well-cooked Boletus cf bicolor var. bicolor "Two-colored Bolete" x inedible Boletus innixus syn. B. caespitosus, syn. Austroboletus innixus "Clustered Brown Bolete" x edible w/ caution Cantharellus cinnabarinus “Cinnabar Chanterelle” x edible Cantharellus lateritius syn. Craterellus cantharellus “Smooth Chanterelle” x edible and good Chlorociboria aeruginascens [or Chlorociboria aeruginosa] "Blue-green Wood Stain" x x choice edible Chroogomphus ochraceus = [N. Amer. misapplied name] C. rutilus "Pine Spike" x edible Clavulina cristata syn. C. coralloides, syn. Clavaria cristata "Crested Coral" x edible Coprinellus disseminatus syn. Pseudocoprinus disseminatus syn. Coprinus disseminatus "Little Helmuts" "Non-inky Coprinus" x insignificant Cortinarius semisanguineus syn. Dermocybe semisanguinea "Red-gilled Cort" x inedible -possibly poisonous Craterellus ignicolor syn. Cantharellus ignicolor "Flame-colored Chanterelle" x x most likely edible Daedaleopsis confragosa syn. Daedalea confragosa "Thin-maze Flat Polypore" x inedible Entoloma incanum syn. Leptonia incana syn. L. euchlora "Green Leptonia" x inedible, possibly poisonous Fomitopsis cajanderi “Rosy Polypore” x x inedible Ganoderma tsugae “Hemlock Varnish Shelf” x inedible, but very medicinal Geastrum saccatum "Rounded Earth Star" x inedible Gerronema strombodes syn. Chrysomphalina strombodes none x unknown Gomphus kauffmanii syn. Turbinellus kaufmanii syn. Cantherellus kaufmannii “Kaufman’s Scaly Chanterelle” x possibly poisonous -best avoided Humidicutis marginata syn. Hygrocybe marginata syn. Hygrophorus marginatus "Orange-gilled Waxy Cap" x edible, but not worthwhile Hydnellum spongiosipes syn. H. velutinum “Spongy-footed Tooth” x inedible Hydnum repandum syn. Dentium repandum “Hedgehog,” “Sweet Tooth” x edible and good Hydnum repandum var. albidum syn. Hydnum albidum “Hedgehog,” “Sweet Tooth” x edible (can be slightly bitter or acrid) Hygrophorus cf tennesseensis "Tennessee Waxy Cap" x inebible Hymenopellis furfuracea syn. Xerula furfuracea syn. Oudemansiella radicata “Rooted Oudemansiella” x edible, but mediocre Hypholoma fasciculare syn. H. subviride, syn. Naemataloma fasciculare “Sulfur Tuft” x poisonous Kretzschmaria deusta syn. Ustulina deusta "Brittle Cinder," "Carbon Cushion" x inedible Laccaria cf laccata "Common Laccaria" x x edible Lactarius allardii none x inedible -acrid and bitter Lactarius argillaceifolius var. argillaceifolius "Clay-gilled Milk Cap" x unknown Lactarius atroviridis none x inedible or unknown /acrid Lactarius chrysorrheus "Gold-drop Milk Cap" x poisonous Lactarius corrugis syn. Lactarius volemus var. subrugosus “Corrugated Milk Cap” x edible and quite good Lactarius deceptivus "Deceptive Milky" x inedible Lactarius gerardii var. subrubescens “Gerard’s Lactarius” x likely edible /unknown Lactarius glaucescens syn. Lactarius piperatus var. glaucescens none x extremely acrid and likely toxic Lactarius speciosus none x unknown Lactarius subpurpureus “Wine-red Lactarius” x edible for most people Lactarius volemus "Bradley," "Tawny Milk Cap" x edible and good Lactarius yazooensis none x(?) Laetiporus sulphureus syn. Polyporus sulphureus "Sulfur Shelf" "Chicken of the Woods" x choice edible (with exceptions) Lentinellus subaustralis [very similar to Lentinellus micheneri] none x(?) no information Lenzites betulina syn. Trametes betulina syn. Daedalea betulina "Multicolor Gill Polypore" x inedible Lycogala epidendrum syn. Lycoperdon epidendrum "Wolf's Milk Slime," "Toothpaste Slime" x inedible Lycoperdon perlatum syn. L. gemmatum “Gem-Studded Puffball” x edible when young and white inside Marasmius siccus (or poss. M. fulvoferrugineus) "Orange Pinwheel Marasmius" x unknown Megacollybia rodmani complex [former misapplied name = M. platyphylla] “Platterful Mushroom” x x gastric upset in some -best avoided Multifurca ochricompacta syn. Russula ochricompacta none x unknown Mycorrhaphium adustum syn. Steccherinum adustum “Kidney-shaped Tooth” x x inedible Phellinus gilvus syn. Polyporus gilvus "Mustard-yellow Polypore," "Oak Conk" x inedible Polyporus radicatus "Rooting Polypore" x inedible Polyporus varius syn. P. elegans "Elegant Polypore" x x inedible Psathyrella delineata "Wrinkled Psathyrella" x unknown Retiboletus ornatipes syn. Boletus ornatipes “Ornate-stalked Bolete” x x inedible in our region -too bitter Rhodocybe mundula syn. Clitopilus noveboracensis "Cracked-cap Rhodocybe" x unknown Russula aeruginea “Tacky Green Russula” x edible Russula compacta “Firm Russula” x edible, but very poor -avoid Russula polyphylla none x inedible Russula variata syn. R. cyanoxantha var. variata “Variable Russula” x edible Schizophyllum commune “Common Split Gill” x inedible Stemonitis splendens [or related species] “Chocolate Tube Slime” x inedible or unknown Stereum complicatum syn. S. rameale "Golden Parchment Fungus" x inedible Stereum ostrea syn. S. fasciatum, syn. S. lobatum, syn. S. versicolor “False Turkey Tail” x inedible Suillus americanus "Chicken Fat Suillus" x edible, but poor, reactions in some Suillus hirtellus none x edible Suillus pictus syn. Suillus spraguei syn. Boletinus pictus “Painted Suillus,” "Painted Bolete" x x edible Thelephora vialis "Ground Wart" x(?) inedible Trametes elegans syn. Daedalea ambigua syn. Daedaleopsis ambigua none x inedible Trametes versicolor syn. Coriolus versicolor “Turkey Tail” x x inedible, but medicinal Tremellodendron pallidum syn. T. schweinitzii "False Coral" x edible, but not worthwhile Trichaptum biforme syn. Polyporus biformis “Violet Toothed Polypore” x x inedible Tylopilus rubrobrunneus "Reddish-brown Bitter Bolete" x inedible -bitter Xeromphalina campanella syn. Omphalina campanella “Golden Trumpets ” “Fuzzy Foot” x inedible Xeromphalina kauffmanii "Cross-veined Troop Mushroom" x inedible Xylaria cubensis none x inedible or unknown species in purple text respresent species from the most recent foray that were identified for the 1st time at CMS forays Totals 64 38 New Species identified (1st time here) 21 The specimens noted below were among those not identified to species: Amanita species x x *The edibility listing is only intended Amanita species x as a guide. Be sure to check several Bolete species x sources before consuming any wild Cortinarius species x x mushrooms, which may be toxic. Entoloma species x Cumberland Mycological Society, it's Hebeloma species x officers and members, assume no Hydnellum species x liability for these contents, nor their Inocybe species x accuracy. Those who consume wild Lactarius species x x mushrooms should be absolutely Ramaria species x x certain of their identification, should Russula species x consult multiple credible sources for Russula species x for verification, and assume full Sarcodon species x responsibility for their actions. Schleroderma species x Trichaptum species x Note: This species list is not respresentative of all mushrooms present on a given date. Collecting is limited to certain trails and locations and not all specimens found are always gathered. Many of the collected specimens never get identified or recorded for various reasons, which include (but are not limited to): time restraints and condition of specimens. For Cumberland Mycological Society home page, click link below: www.cumberlandmycology.com.
Recommended publications
  • La Difesa Delle Piante Ornamentali Avversità, Sintomatologia, Provvedimenti L'estratto Contiene Pagine Non in Sequenza

    La Difesa Delle Piante Ornamentali Avversità, Sintomatologia, Provvedimenti L'estratto Contiene Pagine Non in Sequenza

    L'estratto contiene pagine non in sequenza Aldo Pollini La difesa delle piante ornamentali Avversità, sintomatologia, provvedimenti L'estratto contiene pagine non in sequenza 1a edizione: novembre 2019 Tutte le foto, senza altra indicazione, sono dell’Autore. © Copyright 2019 by «Edagricole - Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media srl» via Eritrea, 21 - 20157 Milano Redazione: Piazza G. Galilei, 6 - 40123 Bologna Vendite: tel. 051/6575833; fax: 051/6575999 5566 e-mail: [email protected] / www.edagricole.it Proprietà letteraria riservata - printed in Italy La riproduzione con qualsiasi processo di duplicazione delle pubblicazioni tutelate dal diritto d’autore è vietata e penalmente perseguibile (art.lI della legge 22 aprile 1941, n. 633). Quest’opera è protetta ai sensi della legge sul diritto d’autore e delle Convenzioni internazionali per la protezione del diritto d’autore (Convenzione di Berna, Convenzione di Ginevra). Nessuna parte di questa pubblicazione può quindi essere riprodotta, memorizzata o tra- smessa con qualsiasi mezzo e in qualsiasi forma (fotomeccanica, fotocopia, elettronica, ecc.) senza l’autorizzazione scritta dell’editore. In ogni caso di riproduzione abusiva si procederà d’ufficio a norma di legge. Realizzazione grafica: Exegi S.n.c., via Pelagio Palagi, 3/2 - 40138 Bologna (BO) Impianti e stampa: LOGO srl, via Marco Polo, 8 - 35010 Borgoricco (PD) Finito di stampare nel novembre 2019 ISBN 978-88-506-5566-3 L'estratto contiene pagine non in sequenza Prefazione Le piante ornamentali abbelliscono aree private e urbane e comprendono specie molto diverse fra loro: essenze arboree (latifoglie e conifere) anche d’alto fusto, piante cespugliose o arbustive caducifoglie o sem- preverdi, piante tappezzanti o da bordura sempreverdi ed erbacee perenni o annuali.
  • Phylogenetic Classification of Trametes

    Phylogenetic Classification of Trametes

    TAXON 60 (6) • December 2011: 1567–1583 Justo & Hibbett • Phylogenetic classification of Trametes SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY Phylogenetic classification of Trametes (Basidiomycota, Polyporales) based on a five-marker dataset Alfredo Justo & David S. Hibbett Clark University, Biology Department, 950 Main St., Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Alfredo Justo, [email protected] Abstract: The phylogeny of Trametes and related genera was studied using molecular data from ribosomal markers (nLSU, ITS) and protein-coding genes (RPB1, RPB2, TEF1-alpha) and consequences for the taxonomy and nomenclature of this group were considered. Separate datasets with rDNA data only, single datasets for each of the protein-coding genes, and a combined five-marker dataset were analyzed. Molecular analyses recover a strongly supported trametoid clade that includes most of Trametes species (including the type T. suaveolens, the T. versicolor group, and mainly tropical species such as T. maxima and T. cubensis) together with species of Lenzites and Pycnoporus and Coriolopsis polyzona. Our data confirm the positions of Trametes cervina (= Trametopsis cervina) in the phlebioid clade and of Trametes trogii (= Coriolopsis trogii) outside the trametoid clade, closely related to Coriolopsis gallica. The genus Coriolopsis, as currently defined, is polyphyletic, with the type species as part of the trametoid clade and at least two additional lineages occurring in the core polyporoid clade. In view of these results the use of a single generic name (Trametes) for the trametoid clade is considered to be the best taxonomic and nomenclatural option as the morphological concept of Trametes would remain almost unchanged, few new nomenclatural combinations would be necessary, and the classification of additional species (i.e., not yet described and/or sampled for mo- lecular data) in Trametes based on morphological characters alone will still be possible.
  • Structural Characterization and Biological Activity of Lactarius Scrobiculatus

    Structural Characterization and Biological Activity of Lactarius Scrobiculatus

    Structural characterization and biological activity of Lactarius scrobiculatus Ivana Tomic Thesis for the Master´ degree in Pharmacy 45 study points Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry School of Pharmacy Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences UNIVERSITY OF OSLO November/2018 II Structural characterization and biological activity of Lactarius scrobiculatus Thesis for Master´ degree in Pharmacy Department for Pharmaceutical chemistry School of Pharmacy Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University in Oslo Ivana Tomic November 2018 Supervisor: Anne Berit Samuelsen III © Author 2018 Structural characterization and biological activity of Lactarius scrobiculatus Ivana Tomic http://www.duo.uio.no/ Print: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo IV Acknowledgments The present thesis was carried out at the Departement of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Oslo (UiO), for the Master´s degree in Pharmacy at the University of Oslo. The other institute include Norwegian Centre of Molecular Medicine, where I have performed activity assay. First and foremost, I would like to thank to my supervisor Anne Berit Samuelsen for hers support and guidance throughout my work and useful comments during the writing. Further, I also want to thank Hoai Thi Nguyen and Cristian Winther Wold for help with carrying out GC and GC-MS analysis. Also, I am very thankful to Karl Malterud for help with NMR analysis. Special thanks to Suthajini Yogarajah for her patience and lab support. I would also like to thank to Kari Inngjerdingen for good and helpful Forskningforberedende kurs. My gratitude goes also to Prebens Morth group at NMCC, special to Julia Weikum and Bojana Sredic, who were always kind and helpful. Finally, I would like to express my fabulous thanks to my wonderful parents, my husband and my four sons for their great patience, sacrifice, moral support and encouragement during my master thesis.
  • A Preliminary Checklist of Arizona Macrofungi

    A Preliminary Checklist of Arizona Macrofungi

    A PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF ARIZONA MACROFUNGI Scott T. Bates School of Life Sciences Arizona State University PO Box 874601 Tempe, AZ 85287-4601 ABSTRACT A checklist of 1290 species of nonlichenized ascomycetaceous, basidiomycetaceous, and zygomycetaceous macrofungi is presented for the state of Arizona. The checklist was compiled from records of Arizona fungi in scientific publications or herbarium databases. Additional records were obtained from a physical search of herbarium specimens in the University of Arizona’s Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium and of the author’s personal herbarium. This publication represents the first comprehensive checklist of macrofungi for Arizona. In all probability, the checklist is far from complete as new species await discovery and some of the species listed are in need of taxonomic revision. The data presented here serve as a baseline for future studies related to fungal biodiversity in Arizona and can contribute to state or national inventories of biota. INTRODUCTION Arizona is a state noted for the diversity of its biotic communities (Brown 1994). Boreal forests found at high altitudes, the ‘Sky Islands’ prevalent in the southern parts of the state, and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa P.& C. Lawson) forests that are widespread in Arizona, all provide rich habitats that sustain numerous species of macrofungi. Even xeric biomes, such as desertscrub and semidesert- grasslands, support a unique mycota, which include rare species such as Itajahya galericulata A. Møller (Long & Stouffer 1943b, Fig. 2c). Although checklists for some groups of fungi present in the state have been published previously (e.g., Gilbertson & Budington 1970, Gilbertson et al. 1974, Gilbertson & Bigelow 1998, Fogel & States 2002), this checklist represents the first comprehensive listing of all macrofungi in the kingdom Eumycota (Fungi) that are known from Arizona.
  • New Records of Polypores from Iran, with a Checklist of Polypores for Gilan Province

    New Records of Polypores from Iran, with a Checklist of Polypores for Gilan Province

    CZECH MYCOLOGY 68(2): 139–148, SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 (ONLINE VERSION, ISSN 1805-1421) New records of polypores from Iran, with a checklist of polypores for Gilan Province 1 2 MOHAMMAD AMOOPOUR ,MASOOMEH GHOBAD-NEJHAD *, 1 SEYED AKBAR KHODAPARAST 1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gilan, P.O. Box 41635-1314, Rasht 4188958643, Iran. 2 Department of Biotechnology, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST), P.O. Box 3353-5111, Tehran 3353136846, Iran; [email protected] *corresponding author Amoopour M., Ghobad-Nejhad M., Khodaparast S.A. (2016): New records of polypores from Iran, with a checklist of polypores for Gilan Province. – Czech Mycol. 68(2): 139–148. As a result of a survey of poroid basidiomycetes in Gilan Province, Antrodiella fragrans, Ceriporia aurantiocarnescens, Oligoporus tephroleucus, Polyporus udus,andTyromyces kmetii are newly reported from Iran, and the following seven species are reported as new to this province: Coriolopsis gallica, Fomitiporia punctata, Hapalopilus nidulans, Inonotus cuticularis, Oligo- porus hibernicus, Phylloporia ribis,andPolyporus tuberaster. An updated checklist of polypores for Gilan Province is provided. Altogether, 66 polypores are known from Gilan up to now. Key words: fungi, hyrcanian forests, poroid basidiomycetes. Article history: received 28 July 2016, revised 13 September 2016, accepted 14 September 2016, published online 27 September 2016. Amoopour M., Ghobad-Nejhad M., Khodaparast S.A. (2016): Nové nálezy chorošů pro Írán a checklist chorošů provincie Gilan. – Czech Mycol. 68(2): 139–148. Jako výsledek systematického výzkumu chorošotvarých hub v provincii Gilan jsou publikovány nové druhy pro Írán: Antrodiella fragrans, Ceriporia aurantiocarnescens, Oligoporus tephroleu- cus, Polyporus udus a Tyromyces kmetii.
  • Polypore Diversity in North America with an Annotated Checklist

    Polypore Diversity in North America with an Annotated Checklist

    Mycol Progress (2016) 15:771–790 DOI 10.1007/s11557-016-1207-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Polypore diversity in North America with an annotated checklist Li-Wei Zhou1 & Karen K. Nakasone2 & Harold H. Burdsall Jr.2 & James Ginns3 & Josef Vlasák4 & Otto Miettinen5 & Viacheslav Spirin5 & Tuomo Niemelä 5 & Hai-Sheng Yuan1 & Shuang-Hui He6 & Bao-Kai Cui6 & Jia-Hui Xing6 & Yu-Cheng Dai6 Received: 20 May 2016 /Accepted: 9 June 2016 /Published online: 30 June 2016 # German Mycological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract Profound changes to the taxonomy and classifica- 11 orders, while six other species from three genera have tion of polypores have occurred since the advent of molecular uncertain taxonomic position at the order level. Three orders, phylogenetics in the 1990s. The last major monograph of viz. Polyporales, Hymenochaetales and Russulales, accom- North American polypores was published by Gilbertson and modate most of polypore species (93.7 %) and genera Ryvarden in 1986–1987. In the intervening 30 years, new (88.8 %). We hope that this updated checklist will inspire species, new combinations, and new records of polypores future studies in the polypore mycota of North America and were reported from North America. As a result, an updated contribute to the diversity and systematics of polypores checklist of North American polypores is needed to reflect the worldwide. polypore diversity in there. We recognize 492 species of polypores from 146 genera in North America. Of these, 232 Keywords Basidiomycota . Phylogeny . Taxonomy . species are unchanged from Gilbertson and Ryvarden’smono- Wood-decaying fungus graph, and 175 species required name or authority changes.
  • MUSHROOMS of the OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST Compiled By

    MUSHROOMS of the OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST Compiled By

    MUSHROOMS OF THE OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST Compiled by Dana L. Richter, School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI for Ottawa National Forest, Ironwood, MI March, 2011 Introduction There are many thousands of fungi in the Ottawa National Forest filling every possible niche imaginable. A remarkable feature of the fungi is that they are ubiquitous! The mushroom is the large spore-producing structure made by certain fungi. Only a relatively small number of all the fungi in the Ottawa forest ecosystem make mushrooms. Some are distinctive and easily identifiable, while others are cryptic and require microscopic and chemical analyses to accurately name. This is a list of some of the most common and obvious mushrooms that can be found in the Ottawa National Forest, including a few that are uncommon or relatively rare. The mushrooms considered here are within the phyla Ascomycetes – the morel and cup fungi, and Basidiomycetes – the toadstool and shelf-like fungi. There are perhaps 2000 to 3000 mushrooms in the Ottawa, and this is simply a guess, since many species have yet to be discovered or named. This number is based on lists of fungi compiled in areas such as the Huron Mountains of northern Michigan (Richter 2008) and in the state of Wisconsin (Parker 2006). The list contains 227 species from several authoritative sources and from the author’s experience teaching, studying and collecting mushrooms in the northern Great Lakes States for the past thirty years. Although comments on edibility of certain species are given, the author neither endorses nor encourages the eating of wild mushrooms except with extreme caution and with the awareness that some mushrooms may cause life-threatening illness or even death.
  • Window Cliffs Natural Area

    Window Cliffs Natural Area

    Window Cliffs State Natural Area Place cursor over cells with red By Cumberland Mycological Society, Crossville, TN triangles to view pictures and/or comments Click underlined x's for photo links click on underlined species for web links to details about those species Scientific name common names (if applicable) Aug-17 Amanita amerifulva [often called 'Amanita fulva' -a European species] “Tawny Grisette” x Amanita flavoconia “Yellow Patches" x Cantharellus cf cibarius [sensu auct. amer. =misapplied name] "Golden Chanterelle" x Gomphus ludovicianus none x(?) Lactarius subplinthogalus none x Lactarius subverellus var. subdistans none x Lactarius subvellereus var. subdistans syn. Lactifluus suvellereus var. subdistans none x Lenzites betulina syn. Trametes betulina syn. Daedalea betulina "Multicolor Gill Polypore" x Phellinus gilvus syn. Polyporus gilvus "Mustard-yellow Polypore," "Oak Conk" x Pholiota polychroa "Variable Pholiota" x Retiboletus ornatipes syn. Boletus ornatipes “Ornate-stalked Bolete” x Russula compacta “Firm Russula” x Russula crustosa "Green Quilt Russula" x(?) Russula densifolia none x Schizophyllum commune “Common Split Gill” x Stereum complicatum syn. S. rameale "Golden Parchment Fungus" x Stereum ostrea syn. S. fasciatum, syn. S. lobatum, syn. S. versicolor “False Turkey Tail" x Trametes versicolor syn. Coriolus versicolor “Turkey Tail” x Tremellodendron pallidum syn. T. schweinitzii "False Coral" x Trichaptum biforme syn. Polyporus biformis “Violet Toothed Polypore” x Tylopilus rubrobrunneus "Reddish-brown Bitter Bolete" x species in purple font were identified for 1st time at any CMS foray In you notice any errors, discrepancies or inaccuracies, please click below: Total Species identified 21 Email Contact New Species identified (1st time here) 21 The specimens noted below were among those not identified to species: Amanita section Vaginatae x Russula species x Trametes species x Note: This species list is not respresentative of all mushrooms present on a given date.
  • How to Distinguish Amanita Smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma Species

    How to Distinguish Amanita Smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma Species

    VOLUME 57: 1 JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2017 www.namyco.org How to Distinguish Amanita smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma species By Michael W. Beug: Chair, NAMA Toxicology Committee A recent rash of mushroom poisonings involving liver failure in Oregon prompted Michael Beug to issue the following photos and information on distinguishing the differences between the toxic Amanita smithiana and edible Matsutake and Catathelasma. Distinguishing the choice edible Amanita smithiana Amanita smithiana Matsutake (Tricholoma magnivelare) from the highly poisonous Amanita smithiana is best done by laying the stipe (stem) of the mushroom in the palm of your hand and then squeezing down on the stipe with your thumb, applying as much pressure as you can. Amanita smithiana is very firm but if you squeeze hard, the stipe will shatter. Matsutake The stipe of the Matsutake is much denser and will not shatter (unless it is riddled with insect larvae and is no longer in good edible condition). There are other important differences. The flesh of Matsutake peels or shreds like string cheese. Also, the stipe of the Matsutake is widest near the gills Matsutake and tapers gradually to a point while the stipe of Amanita smithiana tends to be bulbous and is usually widest right at ground level. The partial veil and ring of a Matsutake is membranous while the partial veil and ring of Amanita smithiana is powdery and readily flocculates into small pieces (often disappearing entirely). For most people the difference in odor is very distinctive. Most collections of Amanita smithiana have a bleach-like odor while Matsutake has a distinctive smell of old gym socks and cinnamon redhots (however, not all people can distinguish the odors).
  • Study Regarding the Olt River (Romania)

    Study Regarding the Olt River (Romania)

    Acta Oecologica Carpatica I THE STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF THE PHYTOPLANKTON FROM DRAGOMIRNA AND SOLCA LAKES (MOLDAVIA, ROMANIA) Cristina BLĂNARU 1, Mihaela ŢICULEAN 2 and Gabriela SASU 3 KEYWORDS: Romania, Moldavia, Dragomirna Lake, Solca Lake, phytoplankton, dynamics, numerical density, biomass. ABSTRACT In this paper was realised a has variations regarding its numerical comparative study regarding the density and biomass from one year to phytoplankton density and biomass of two another, without the presences of the algae artificial lakes: Dragomirna and Solca in the blooming phenomena appearance which can period 2001 - 2005. The water of both these show a hipertrophy level which modify the lakes was destinated for the local human organoleptical proprieties of the water. population needs, Dragomirna Lake water The predominance in the being used also for the Suceava locality phytopankton of the diatoms, both like industry. From the geographical point of density and biomass, confirm the relatively view both lakes are localised in the Suceava low level of trophicity of these lakes, a good Plateau, the Solca Lake being situated in a sign for the two ecosystems, indicating a forest area and Dragomirna Lake in a good quality of the water. hillocks lawn area. Based on the obtained results from The samplings were done with a the phytoplankton density and biomass frequency of 3 - 4 on year, starting in the analisis, the Solca Lake can be considered as month of April and finished in the first part oligotrophic and Dragomirna Lake as of November. It was highlighted that the mezotrophic. development degree of the phytoplankton REZUMAT: Structura şi dinamica fitoplanctonului lacurilor Dragomirna şi Solca (Moldova, România).
  • A Revised Family-Level Classification of the Polyporales (Basidiomycota)

    A Revised Family-Level Classification of the Polyporales (Basidiomycota)

    fungal biology 121 (2017) 798e824 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funbio A revised family-level classification of the Polyporales (Basidiomycota) Alfredo JUSTOa,*, Otto MIETTINENb, Dimitrios FLOUDASc, € Beatriz ORTIZ-SANTANAd, Elisabet SJOKVISTe, Daniel LINDNERd, d €b f Karen NAKASONE , Tuomo NIEMELA , Karl-Henrik LARSSON , Leif RYVARDENg, David S. HIBBETTa aDepartment of Biology, Clark University, 950 Main St, Worcester, 01610, MA, USA bBotanical Museum, University of Helsinki, PO Box 7, 00014, Helsinki, Finland cDepartment of Biology, Microbial Ecology Group, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden dCenter for Forest Mycology Research, US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, 53726, WI, USA eScotland’s Rural College, Edinburgh Campus, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK fNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172, Blindern, NO 0318, Oslo, Norway gInstitute of Biological Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066, Blindern, N-0316, Oslo, Norway article info abstract Article history: Polyporales is strongly supported as a clade of Agaricomycetes, but the lack of a consensus Received 21 April 2017 higher-level classification within the group is a barrier to further taxonomic revision. We Accepted 30 May 2017 amplified nrLSU, nrITS, and rpb1 genes across the Polyporales, with a special focus on the Available online 16 June 2017 latter. We combined the new sequences with molecular data generated during the Poly- Corresponding Editor: PEET project and performed Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses. Ursula Peintner Analyses of our final 3-gene dataset (292 Polyporales taxa) provide a phylogenetic overview of the order that we translate here into a formal family-level classification.
  • DNA Barcoding Facilitates a Rapid Biotic Survey of a Temperate Nature

    DNA Barcoding Facilitates a Rapid Biotic Survey of a Temperate Nature

    Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve Angela Telfer, Monica Young, Jenna Quinn, Kate Perez, Crystal Sobel, Jayme Sones, Valerie Levesque-Beaudin, Rachael Derbyshire, Jose Fernandez-Triana, Rodolphe Rougerie, et al. To cite this version: Angela Telfer, Monica Young, Jenna Quinn, Kate Perez, Crystal Sobel, et al.. Biodiversity inven- tories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve. Biodiversity Data Journal, Pensoft, 2015, 3, pp.e6313. 10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313. hal-01206879 HAL Id: hal-01206879 https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01206879 Submitted on 12 Oct 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e6313 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 Taxonomic Paper Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve Angela C Telfer‡, Monica R Young‡§, Jenna Quinn , Kate Perez‡, Crystal N Sobel‡, Jayme E Sones‡, Valerie Levesque-Beaudin‡,