Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Alice Doesn't Feminism Semiotics Cinema by Teresa De Lauretis Alice Doesn't: Feminism Semiotics Cinema by Teresa De Lauretis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Alice Doesn't Feminism Semiotics Cinema by Teresa de Lauretis Alice Doesn't: Feminism Semiotics Cinema by Teresa de Lauretis. Our systems have detected unusual traffic activity from your network. Please complete this reCAPTCHA to demonstrate that it's you making the requests and not a robot. If you are having trouble seeing or completing this challenge, this page may help. If you continue to experience issues, you can contact JSTOR support. Block Reference: #070554e0-ce44-11eb-ba5f-61a590b1b25f VID: #(null) IP: 116.202.236.252 Date and time: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:41:53 GMT. Teresa de Lauretis. Teresa de Lauretis (* 1938 in Italy ) is an Italian-American literary scholar. She also publishes in the fields of film theory , semiotics and feminist theory and has made significant contributions to queer theory . She did her PhD in Modern Language and Literature at the Luigi Bocconi University of Economics in Milan . In the mid-1960s, she went to the United States as a young mother , where she worked at several Romance Studies institutes until she moved to the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee in 1968 . At that time, it was the center of US reception of European film theory. From 1985 she worked in the interdisciplinary History of Consciousness Program at the University of California, Santa Cruz , where she is now professor for the history of consciousness. Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema by Teresa de Lauretis. After reading the first two chapters of this book I have found many different topics concerning feminism, semiotics and cinema to my interests. I do often struggle in my work when deciding which people to use as ‘models’ in my pieces and after reading the first few pages of the book, Lauretis reminds us that ‘personal is political’. I’m sure it will take some time and more research to progressively experiment and successfully choose the different types of people I use within my work but for now I think using myself is a good enough starting point. Lauretis reassures the reader that language and metaphors, especially, need not be thought of belonging to anyone ; and that in fact masters are made as we ‘make conversation’ and, not wishing to begin an argument, accept their answers or their metaphors. The point seems to be that I must be willing to ‘begin an argument’ and by doing this will formulate questions between myself and others. The questions will redefine the context, displace the terms of metaphors and even make up new ones. I believe this in itself is the art work. If my work doesn’t make viewers want to question my work or have their own point of view from the different experiences they have faced in life as an individual, then in my eyes I haven’t been successful in my practice. As I am interested a lot in the ideas behind my work and I sometimes find it challenging to communicate to the viewer exactly what I want them to see. However, I am finally getting to terms with the fact that there are no final answers. I can’t be wrong or right. Lauretis also reminds us this in the book, feminist theory in particular is an ongoing discussion. ‘How does one write or speak as a woman? How can we think of women outside of the man/non-man dichotomy, the ‘sexual difference’ on which all discourse is based? How do we envision women as subjects in a culture that objectifies, imprisons and excludes, woman? Semiotics and psychoanalysis give different accounts on the subject, but neither is capable of giving these answers’. I think this may relate to why I have always had an interest in cycles, limits and control. In my previous work I exhibited my film on a loop and played it from inside a box; maybe I should look into the different ideas of how to represent this ‘never ending discussion’ in the actual content of my work rather than just the way it is edited or shown to the viewer. Further in the book another discussion I find interesting is concerning the sexual exploitation of women and the repression or containment of female sexuality. Lauretis talks about these topics regarding the discussion of the pornographic film by Yann Lardeau. She discusses the ideas behind the film(one I’ve tried watch, however is difficult to find) and talks of how the naked womans body has always been representative of revealing truth. Within the film Lardeaus uses close ups as a representation of truth, the camera constantly closing in on the womans sex, which exhibits it as an object of desire. The interesting thing about deconstructing the ideas behind the pornographic film in this way is that you realise it is everything else that surround the making of film rather than the act of sex itself which is pornographic; It is the cinema itself, as a medium, which is pornographic. Regarding spectatorship a linking statement within the book which made me think was that ‘cinema, like poetry, is translinguistic. It encodes human action in a grammar, a set of conventions, a vehicle; but as soon as it is perceived, heard, received by a reader/spectator, the convention is discarded and action(reality) is recreated as a dynamic of feelings, affects, passions and ideas in that reader/spectator.’ Questions to look at within work. How do we see? How do we attribute meaning to what we see? What about language or sound? How does what we see around us (consciously and subconsciously) affect our lives, decisions and the way we feel about ourselves and even to one another? Teresa de Lauretis. Teresa de Lauretis (born 1938 in Bologna) is an Italian author and Distinguished Professor Emerita of the History of Consciousness at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her areas of interest include semiotics, psychoanalysis, film theory, literary theory, feminism, women's studies, lesbian- and queer studies. She has also written on science fiction. Fluent in English and Italian, she writes in both languages. Additionally, her work has been translated into sixteen other languages. Contents. Theories Honors, awards and grants Bibliography References External links. De Lauretis received her doctorate in Modern Languages and Literatures from Bocconi University in Milan before coming to the United States. She joined the History of Consciousness with Hayden White, Donna Haraway, Fredric Jameson and Angela Davis. Has held Visiting Professorships at universities worldwide including ones in Canada, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Austria, Argentina, Chile, France, Spain, Hungary, Croatia, Mexico and the Netherlands. She currently lives in San Francisco, CA, but often spends time in Italy and the Netherlands. Theories. De Lauretis' account of subjectivity as a product of "being subject/ed to semiosis" (i.e., making meanings and being made by them) helps to theoretically resolve and overcome the tension between the human action (agency) and structure. She makes use of Umberto Eco's reading of C.S. Peirce in order to establish her notion of semiotics of experience. She brings corporeality back to the discourse on the constitution of subjectivity which has been conceived mainly in the linguistic terms. Her semiotics is not just the semiotics of language but also the semiotics of visual images and non-verbal practices. Her (Peircean) "habit" or "habit-change" is often compared to Bourdieu's notion of habitus. Michel Foucault’s analysis of body excludes the consideration of the specificity of the female body that many feminists have criticized. Supplementing the failure, gender should be one of the effects of technology which renders the basic intelligibility of body and that turns to de Lauretis’ "technology of gender". de Lauretis coined the term "queer theory" although the way in which it is used today differs from what she originally suggested by the term. [1] Although she coined the term she abandoned it barely three years later, on the grounds that it had been taken over by those mainstream forces and institutions it was coined to resist. [2] Honors, awards and grants. Guest of honour, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Argentina (2014) [3] Doctor honoris causa, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina (2014) [3] Distinguished Career Award, Society for Cinema and Media Studies (2010) [3] Winner, Choice Magazine Outstanding Reference/Academic Book Award (2009) [4] IHR Humanities Research Fellowship (2007) [3] Doctor of Philosophy honoris causa, University of Lund, Sweden (2005) [3] UCHRI Resident Faculty Fellowship, University of California, Irvine (2003-2004) [3] Guggenheim Fellowship (1993) [3] NEH Fellowship for University Teachers (1992) [3] Conference Grant, Humanities Division, University of California, Santa Cruz (1990) [3] Conference Grant, Research Council of Canada (1884) [3] Research Fellowship, Center for Twentieth Century Studies, University of Wisconsin —Milwaukee (1982-83) [3] Grant in Media Studies, National Endowment for the Arts (1977-78) [3] Bibliography. Freud's Drive: Psychoanalysis, Literature, and Film (2008) [5][4] Figures of Resistance: Essays in Feminist Theory (2007) [6] The Practice of Love: Lesbian Sexuality and Perverse Desire (1994) [7] Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction (1987) [8] Feminist Studies/Critical Studies (1986) [9] Alice Doesn't: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema (1984) [10] The Cinematic Apparatus (1980) [11] The Technological Imagination (1980) [12] Feminist Studies/Critical Studies (1986) The Cinematic Apparatus (1980) The Technological Imagination (1980) Guest-edited "Queer Theory" issue of difference s : A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies (1991) (with David Allen) "Theoretical Perspectives in Cinema" issue of Ciné-Tracts: A Journal of Film and Cultural Studies (1977). La sintassi del desiderio: struttura e forme del romanzo sveviano (Ravenna: Longo, 1976) Umberto Eco (Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 1981) Pratica d'amore : percorsi del desiderio perverso (Milano: Tartaruga, 1997) [13] Soggetti eccentrici (Milano: Feltrinelli, 1999) Related Research Articles.