Novttatesamerican MUSEUM PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET NEW YORK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Novttatesamerican MUSEUM PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET NEW YORK NovttatesAMERICAN MUSEUM PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET NEW YORK. N.Y. 10024 U.S.A. NUMBER 2707 FEBRUARY 26, 1981 ROBERT J. RAVEN AND NORMAN I. PLATNICK A Revision of the American Spiders of the Family Microstigmatidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae) i.. AMERICAN MUSEUM Norntates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 2707, pp. 1-20, figs. 1-54 February 26, 1981 A Revision of the American Spiders of the Family Microstigmatidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae) ROBERT J. RAVEN1 AND NORMAN I. PLATNICK2 ABSTRACT The tribal grouping Microstigmateae Roewer is Venezuelan species Pseudonemesia parva Ca- removed from the Dipluridae and elevated to fa- poriacco is described for the first time, and a new milial rank. The subfamily Pseudonemesiinae Ca- species, P. kochalkai, is described from Colom- poriacco is transferred from the Ctenizidae to the bia. A genus (Ministigmata) described for a new Microstigmatidae. The family is suggested to be species (M. minuta) from Brazil is hypothesized the sister group of the Mecicobothriidae plus to be more closely related to the South African Hexathelidae and Dipluridae. The male of the genus Microstigmata than to Pseudonemesia. INTRODUCTION The unusual mygalomorph spiders which (Dipluridae and Ctenizidae), neither of form the subject of this paper have been pre- whose defining features they share. viously studied by only three other arach- Hewitt (1916) had difficulty assigning the nologists: Hewitt (1916, 1925), Lawrence first known species, Microstigmata geophil- (1938), and Caporiacco (1955). The New um from Grahamstown, South Africa, to a World species, in particular, have long been family. He excluded the genus from the overlooked both because of their rarity in Ctenizidae because of the absence of a che- collections and their extremely small size liceral rastellum and placed it in the Dipluri- (adult males, reported here for the first time, dae, even though he was "unable to discover range from 1 to 3 mm. in total length and definite indication of close relationship to thus rival the mecicobothriid genus Hexu- any of the known genera" of that family. If rella and the diplurid genera Microhexura the species actually was a diplurid, the pres- and Masteria as the world's smallest myga- ence of two rows of teeth on the paired tarsal lomorphs). Moreover, these spiders illus- claws would associate it with the subfamily trate the difficulties currently plaguing the Diplurinae, and the short posterior lateral higher classification of mygalomorphs, hav- spinnerets would exclude it from diplurine ing been described in two different families subgroups other than the Brachytheleae and I Assistant Arachnologist, Queensland Museum, Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, Queensland 4006, Australia. 2 Associate Curator, Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History; Adjunct Professor, Department of Biology, City College, City University of New York. Copyright ©) American Museum of Natural History 1981 ISSN 0003-0082 / Price $1.65 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2707 FIGS. 1-4. Book-lung openings, ventral views. 1. Microstigmata sp., 560x. 2. Microstigmata sp., 2400x. 3. Sphodros sp. (Atypidae), 125 x . 4. Paratropis sp. (Paratropididae), 125 x. similar forms. However, Hewitt noted that of Microstigmata from Natal, gave no indi- Microstigmata lacks the tarsal scopulae typ- cation of his views on their affinities beyond ical of the Brachytheleae, and concluded labeling them as members of a "primitive only that the genus "can be considered as genus of four-lunged spider" (p. 460). one of the connecting links between the two Caporiacco (1955) had similar difficulties families Ctenizidae and Dipluridae" (1916, p. in placing his new Venezuelan spider, Pseu- 206). donemesia parva. He noted that it generally Discovery of the male of the species did resembled diplurids but (like Microstigmata) not lead Hewitt (1925) to change his assess- is excluded from that family by having short ment of the familial position of Microstig- posterior lateral spinnerets with short apical mata, but in addition to the Brachytheleae segments. He assigned the species to the he did indicate a possibly close relationship Ctenizidae and established for it the new to the family Paratropididae. Lawrence subfamily Pseudonemesiinae, differing from (1938), in describing two additional species most other ctenizids in having only two spin- 1981 RAVEN AND PLATNICK: MICROSTIGMATIDAE 3 I -10 IJ .i..: _aZ FIGS. 5-10. Cuticle of tarsus I, dorsal views. 5. Pseudonemesia parva Caporiacco, 1150x. 6. P. kochalkai, new species, 1350x. 7, 8. Ministigmata minuta, new species; 7, 1300x, 8, 5250x. 9, 10. Microstigmata sp.; 9, 210x, 10, 2000x. 4 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2707 0 FIGS. 11-14. Claws of leg I, ventrolateral views. 11. Microstigmata sp., 240x. 12. Ministigmata minuta, new species, 1250x. 13. Pseudonemesia parva Caporiacco, 1050x. 14. P. kochalkai, new species, i1OOx. nerets and lacking a cheliceral rastellum. As ican species, has allowed us to present below the presence of a rastellum is virtually the a reassessment of these spiders and their re- only defining character of the Ctenizidae, lationships. We will first argue that Micro- Caporiacco's assessment is fully as proble- stigmata, Pseudonemesia, and the new matical as Hewitt's. Caporiacco did not as- species described below represent a distinct sociate Pseudonemesia with Microstigmata, and monophyletic group, and then inquire as probably because the small size of the former to what their sister group may be and how prevented him from observing some of the the various microstigmatid species may be characters they share. interrelated. Thus it is clear even from the literature that the present taxonomic positions of these MONOPHYLY two genera are untenable. The discovery of There are three characters that seem to be adult males that can be attributed to P. par- synapomorphies uniting the species treated va, as well as of two additional South Amer- below as microstigmatids: the tiny, oval 1981 RAVEN AND PLATNICK: MICROSTIGMATIDAE 5 I I I I FIGS. 15-20. Claws of leg I, lateral views (15-19), ventral view (20). 15. Ministigmata minuta, new species, 1160x. 16. Pseudonemesia kochalkai, new species, 750x. 17. Nemesia sp. (Ctenizidae), 240x. 18. Diplura sp. (Dipluridae), 240x. 19, 20. Diplothelopsis sp. (Pycnothelidae), 125x. 6 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2707 I p- . -0 I :.' '. '. r, -4 jppr,..,, .. :,?, -, .. FIGS. 21-24. Cuticle and setae of leg I, dorsolateral views. 21. Paratropis sp. (Paratropididae), 240x. 22. Microstigmata sp., 240x. 23, 24. Ministigmata minuta, new species; 23, 1040x, 24, 2400x (whorled seta at base of claws). book-lung openings, the scaly cuticle of the begins to approach the microstigmatids in legs and palpi, and the tarsal claw dentition. this character is the Paratropididae. Some Hewitt (1916) first recognized the peculiari- paratropidids, particularly small ones, have ties of the book-lung apertures of Microstig- book-lung openings that are reduced in size mata. Whereas in other mygalomorphs the (perhaps an adaptation to living in, and hav- book-lungs open through long, transverse ing their bodies encrusted and camouflaged slits (figs. 3, 4), in Microstigmata the open- by, dirt), but they have a sclerotized rim only ings are unusually small oval pores com- along their anterior borders and generally re- pletely surrounded by a sclerotized rim, with tain the slit-like form found in other myg- the opening consisting "of a rather cribri- alomorphs (fig. 4). The peculiar book-lung form plate reminiscent of the stigmata of cer- openings of microstigmatids cannot be dis- tain insects, which is provided with a few missed as merely being adaptations to small minute black hairs on its surface" (Law- size and a resulting higher rate of water loss, rence, 1938, p. 460; figs. 1, 2). The only other for Microstigmata species are no smaller mygalomorph group known to us that even than many other mygalomorphs, and the 1981 RAVEN AND PLATNICK: MICROSTIGMATIDAE 7 V.A 0 j A 1014 I" .1 4 a I ., i"* A 14. a :-, .4 .14 ,a,* 10* W. ..4 I 4. -,I 1. ... i FIGS. 25-28. Serrula, anterior views. 25. Microstigmata sp., 500x. 26. Ministigmata minuta, new species, 1250x. 27. Pseudonemesia parva Caporiacco, 725x. 28. P. kochalkai, new species, 600x. modifications do not occur in other tiny of atypid, antrodiaetid, hexathelid, and di- forms like Hexurella, Microhexura, and plurid legs can be found in Gertsch and Plat- Masteria. nick, 1979, figs. 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, Secondly, the microstigmatids are distinc- 27). Interestingly, spiders of the suborder tive in having the cuticle of the legs and ped- Mesothelae have similar (although less ele- ipalps covered with flattened scales, semi- vated) digitiform pustules (Gertsch and Plat- circular or triangular in shape and highest at nick, 1979, figs. 11, 13), as do a few species their distal ends. These are most easily seen of Dipluridae (Ixamatus and a related genus in Pseudonemesia (figs. 5, 6), but they also in the Diplurinae; Raven, 1980a, figs. 11-13), occur in Mfcrostigmata and the new genus but there are no scales underlying the pus- Ministigmata, where they bear numerous tules in those species. digitiform pustules (figs. 7, 9); the outlines of Finally, the form of the tarsal claws may the scales in these species are marked by also be synapomorphic for microstigmatids. longer pustules (figs. 8, 10). Such scales are The paired (superior) claws each bear two not known to occur in other mygalomorphs rows of teeth (figs. 11-14), a condition un- (comparable scanning electron micrographs usual among mygalomorphs but also found 8 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2707 .A. FIGS. 29-32. Tarsal organ of leg I, lateral views. 29. Microstigmata sp., 50Ox. 30. Ministigmata minuta, new species, 5250x. 31. Pseudonemesia parva Caporiacco, 2800x. 32. P. kochalkai, new species, 1l,500x. in the Pycnothelidae, Dipluridae (Dipluri- claws of other diplurines (such as Teyl) re- nae), and some Ctenizidae (the Aporopty- semble this ctenizid condition more than the cheae and Nemesieae of Simon, 1892).
Recommended publications
  • A New Species of Melloina (Araneae: Paratropididae) from Venezuela
    ZOOLOGIA 30 (1): 101–106, February, 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702013000100013 A new species of Melloina (Araneae: Paratropididae) from Venezuela Rogério Bertani Laboratório Especial de Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto Butantan. Avenida Vital Brazil 1500, 05503-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT. A new species of Melloina Brignoli, 1985, Melloina santuario sp. nov., is described from a cave in Venezuela. This is the third species described in this rarely sampled genus, and the first species known from both male and female. The male of M. santuario sp. nov. is distinguished by a longer embolus and fewer number of spines on the anterior tarsi. Females and immatures are distinguished by having fewer numbers of labial cuspules. The description of a new species from male and female samples increases our knowledge about Melloina. This added knowledge is important to the under- standing of mygalomorph relationships, mainly in the Theraphosoidina, as Melloina is a basal genus within the Paratropididae. KEY WORDS. Cave; Glabropelma; Mygalomorphae; Neotropical; Spider taxonomy. Melloina Brignoli, 1985 includes two rare species. The type A new species of Melloina is described herein. It is the first species, Melloina gracilis (Schenkel, 1953), was described as species from this genus based on male and female specimens. Melloa gracilis Schenkel, 1953, based on a single male from Venezuela. It was only after 46 years that additional specimens MATERIAL AND METHODS were discovered, and a second species, Melloina rickwesti Raven, 1999, was described from a female and an immature from The general description format follows RAVEN (1999, Panama.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: - Tarantula (Araneae: Theraphosidae) spider diversity, distribution and habitat-use: A study on Protected Area adequacy and Project Title: conservation planning at a landscape level in the Western Ghats of Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka Date of Report: 18 August 2011 Dr. Manju Siliwal Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society Report Author and Contact 9-A, Lal Bahadur Colony, Near Bharathi Colony Information Peelamedu Coimbatore 641004 Tamil Nadu, India CEPF Region: The Western Ghats Region (Sahyadri-Konkan and Malnad-Kodugu Corridors). 2. Strategic Direction: To improve the conservation of globally threatened species of the Western Ghats through systematic conservation planning and action. The present project aimed to improve the conservation status of two globally threatened (Molur et al. 2008b, Siliwal et al., 2008b) ground dwelling theraphosid species, Thrigmopoeus insignis and T. truculentus endemic to the Western Ghats through systematic conservation planning and action. Investment Priority 2.1 Monitor and assess the conservation status of globally threatened species with an emphasis on lesser-known organisms such as reptiles and fish. The present project was focused on an ignored or lesser-known group of spiders called Tarantulas/ Theraphosid spiders and provided valuable information on population status and potential conservation sites in Uttara Kannada district, which will help in future monitoring and assessment of conservation status of the two globally threatened theraphosid species T. insignis and Near Threatened T. truculentus. Investment Priority 2.3. Evaluate the existing protected area network for adequate globally threatened species representation and assess effectiveness of protected area types in biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemolymph and Hemocytes of Tarantula Spiders: Physiological Roles and Potential As Sources of Bioactive Molecules
    In: Advances in Animal Science and Zoology. Volume 8 ISBN: 978-1-63483-552-7 Editor: Owen P. Jenkins © 2015 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. No part of this digital document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted commercially in any form or by any means. The publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this digital document, but makes no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of information contained herein. This digital document is sold with the clear understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, medical or any other professional services. Chapter 8 HEMOLYMPH AND HEMOCYTES OF TARANTULA SPIDERS: PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES AND POTENTIAL AS SOURCES OF BIOACTIVE MOLECULES Tatiana Soares, Thiago H. Napoleão, Felipe R. B. Ferreira and Patrícia M. G. Paiva∗ Departamento de Bioquímica, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil ABSTRACT Arachnids compose the most important and numerous group of chelicerates and include spiders, scorpions, mites and ticks. Some arachnids have a worldwide distribution and can live for more than two decades. This is in part due to their efficient defense system, with an innate immunity that acts as a first line of protection against bacterial, fungal and viral pathogens. The adaptive success of the spiders stimulates the study of their defense mechanisms at cellular and molecular levels with both biological and biotechnological purposes. The hemocytes (plasmatocytes, cyanocytes, granulocytes, prohemocytes, and leberidocytes) of spiders are responsible for phagocytosis, nodulation, and encapsulation of pathogens as well as produce substances that mediate humoral mechanisms such as antimicrobial peptides and factors involved in the coagulation of hemolymph and melanization of microorganisms.
    [Show full text]
  • (Araneae: Theraphosidae) from Miocene Chiapas Amber, Mexico
    XX…………………………………… ARTÍCULO: A fossil tarantula (Araneae: Theraphosidae) from Miocene Chiapas amber, Mexico Jason A. Dunlop, Danilo Harms & David Penney ARTÍCULO: A fossil tarantula (Araneae: Theraphosidae) from Miocene Chiapas amber, Mexico Jason A. Dunlop Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin D-10115 Berlin, Germany [email protected] Abstract: Danilo Harms A fossil tarantula (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) is described from Freie Universität BerlinInstitut für an exuvium in Tertiary (Miocene) Chiapas amber, Simojovel region, Chiapas Biologie, Chemie & Pharmazie State, Mexico. It is difficult to assign it further taxonomically, but it is the first Evolution und Systematik der Tiere mygalomorph recorded from Chiapas amber and only the second unequivocal Königin-Luise-Str. 1–3 record of a fossil theraphosid. With a carapace length of ca. 0.9 cm and an es- D-14195 Berlin, Germany timated leg span of at least 5 cm it also represents the largest spider ever re- [email protected] corded from amber. Of the fifteen currently recognised mygalomorph families, eleven have a fossil record (summarised here), namely: Atypidae, Antrodiaeti- David Penney dae, Mecicobothriidae, Hexathelidae, Dipluridae, Ctenizidae, Nemesiidae, Mi- Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental crostigmatidae, Barychelidae, Cyrtaucheniidae and Theraphosidae. Sciences. Key words: Araneae, Theraphosidae, Palaeontology, Miocene, amber, Chiapas, The University of Manchester Mexico. Manchester. M13 9PL, UK [email protected] Revista Ibérica de Aracnología ISSN: 1576 - 9518. Un fósil de tarántula (Araneae: Theraphosidae) en ambar del Dep. Legal: Z-2656-2000. Vol. 15, 30-VI-2007 mioceno de Chiapas, México. Sección: Artículos y Notas. Pp: 9 − 17. Fecha publicación: 30 Abril 2008 Resumen: Se describe una tarántula fósil a partir de una exuvia en ámbar del terciario Edita: (mioceno) de Chiapas, región de Simojovel, estado de Chiapas, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Rossi Gf Me Rcla Par.Pdf (1.346Mb)
    RESSALVA Atendendo solicitação da autora, o texto completo desta dissertação será disponibilizado somente a partir de 28/02/2021. UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” Instituto de Biociências – Rio Claro Departamento de Zoologia Giullia de Freitas Rossi Taxonomia e biogeografia de aranhas cavernícolas da infraordem Mygalomorphae RIO CLARO – SP Abril/2019 Giullia de Freitas Rossi Taxonomia e biogeografia de aranhas cavernícolas da infraordem Mygalomorphae Dissertação apresentada ao Departamento de Zoologia do Instituto de Biociências de Rio Claro, como requisito para conclusão de Mestrado do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia. Orientador: Prof. Dr. José Paulo Leite Guadanucci RIO CLARO – SP Abril/2019 Rossi, Giullia de Freitas R832t Taxonomia e biogeografia de aranhas cavernícolas da infraordem Mygalomorphae / Giullia de Freitas Rossi. -- Rio Claro, 2019 348 f. : il., tabs., fotos, mapas Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claro Orientador: José Paulo Leite Guadanucci 1. Aracnídeo. 2. Ordem Araneae. 3. Sistemática. I. Título. Sistema de geração automática de fichas catalográficas da Unesp. Biblioteca do Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claro. Dados fornecidos pelo autor(a). Essa ficha não pode ser modificada. Dedico este trabalho à minha família. AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço ao meus pais, Érica e José Leandro, ao meu irmão Pedro, minha tia Jerusa e minha avó Beth pelo apoio emocional não só nesses dois anos de mestrado, mas durante toda a minha vida. À José Paulo Leite Guadanucci, que aceitou ser meu orientador, confiou em mim e ensinou tudo o que sei sobre Mygalomorphae. Ao meu grande amigo Roberto Marono, pelos anos de estágio e companheirismo na UNESP Bauru, onde me ensinou sobre aranhas, e ao incentivo em ir adiante.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae (Spider) Photos
    Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Amblypygi Schizomida Uropygi Liphistiidae Liphistiinae|Liphistius|55 Liphistiidae Heptathelinae|Ryuthela|15 Liphistiidae|Heptathelinae|Heptathela|10 Liphistiidae
    Amblypygi Schizomida Uropygi Liphistiidae|Liphistiinae|Liphistius|55 Liphistiidae|Heptathelinae|Ryuthela|15 Liphistiidae|Heptathelinae|Heptathela|10 Liphistiidae|Heptathelinae|Qiongthela|7 Liphistiidae|Heptathelinae|Ganthela|7 Liphistiidae|Heptathelinae|Sinothela|4 Liphistiidae|Heptathelinae|Vinathela|7 Liphistiidae|Heptathelinae|Songthela|12 Hexurellidae|1|4 Mecicobothriidae|1|2 Atypidae|Calommata|13 Atypidae|Atypus|34 Atypidae|Sphodros|7 Megahexuridae|1|1 Antrodiaetidae|Aliatypus|14 Antrodiaetidae|Hexura|2 Antrodiaetidae|Antrodiaetus|18 Antrodiaetidae|Atypoides|3 Ischnothelidae|5|26 Microhexuridae|1|2 Masteriidae|3|35 Euagridae|Euagrinae|6|43 Euagridae|Australothelinae|6|38 Hexathelidae|Mediothele|6 Hexathelidae|Scotinoecus|4 Hexathelidae|Hexathele|20 Hexathelidae|Plesiothele|1 Hexathelidae|Teranodes|2 Hexathelidae|Paraembolides|8 Hexathelidae|Bymaniella|4 Porrhothelidae|1|5 Macrothelidae|1|32 Paratropididae|5|17 Bemmeridae|2|35 Theraphosidae|147|1000 Barychelidae|42|295 Nemesiidae|22|172 Pycnothelidae|7|91 Cyrtaucheniidae|8|108 Dipluridae|5|54 Anaminidae|9|84 Microstigmatidae|12|41 Entypesidae|3|30 Halonoproctidae|6|91 Migidae|11|97 Idiopidae|22|408 Euctenizidae|7|76 Ctenizidae|Cteniza|3 Ctenizidae|Cyrtocarenum|2 Stasimopidae|1|47 Actinopodidae|Actinopus|49 Actinopodidae|Plesiolena|2 Actinopodidae|Missulena|18 Atracidae|Hadronyche|31 Atracidae|Atrax|3 Atracidae|Illawarra|1 Filistatidae|19|179 Hypochilidae|Hypochilus|10 Hypochilidae|Ectatosticta|2 Caponiidae|18|119 Trogloraptoridae|1|1 Telemidae|10|85 Segestriidae|4|132 Oonopidae|115|1816
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of New Zealand Araneae (Spiders), 2020
    2021 NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 34 Conservation status of New Zealand Araneae (spiders), 2020 Phil J. Sirvid, Cor J. Vink, Brian M. Fitzgerald, Mike D. Wakelin, Jeremy Rolfe and Pascale Michel Cover: A large sheetweb sider, Cambridgea foliata – Not Threatened. Photo: Jeremy Rolfe. New Zealand Threat Classification Series is a scientific monograph series presenting publications related to the New Zealand Threat Classification System (NZTCS). Most will be lists providing NZTCS status of members of a plant or animal group (e.g. algae, birds, spiders). There are currently 23 groups, each assessed once every 5 years. From time to time the manual that defines the categories, criteria and process for the NZTCS will be reviewed. Publications in this series are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. This report is available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications. The NZTCS database can be accessed at nztcs.org.nz. For all enquiries, email [email protected]. © Copyright August 2021, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 2324–1713 (web PDF) ISBN 978–1–99–115291–6 (web PDF) This report was prepared for publication by Te Rōpū Ratonga Auaha, Te Papa Atawhai/Creative Services, Department of Conservation; editing and layout by Lynette Clelland. Publication was approved by the Director, Terrestrial Ecosystems Unit, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand Published by Department of Conservation Te Papa Atawhai, PO Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconsideration of the Classification of the Spider Infraorder Mygalomorphae (Arachnida: Araneae) Based on Three Nuclear Genes and Morphology
    A Reconsideration of the Classification of the Spider Infraorder Mygalomorphae (Arachnida: Araneae) Based on Three Nuclear Genes and Morphology Jason E. Bond1*, Brent E. Hendrixson2, Chris A. Hamilton1, Marshal Hedin3 1 Department of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America, 2 Department of Biology, Millsaps College, Jackson, Mississippi, United States of America, 3 Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America Abstract Background: The infraorder Mygalomorphae (i.e., trapdoor spiders, tarantulas, funnel web spiders, etc.) is one of three main lineages of spiders. Comprising 15 families, 325 genera, and over 2,600 species, the group is a diverse assemblage that has retained a number of features considered primitive for spiders. Despite an evolutionary history dating back to the lower Triassic, the group has received comparatively little attention with respect to its phylogeny and higher classification. The few phylogenies published all share the common thread that a stable classification scheme for the group remains unresolved. Methods and Findings: We report here a reevaluation of mygalomorph phylogeny using the rRNA genes 18S and 28S, the nuclear protein-coding gene EF-1c, and a morphological character matrix. Taxon sampling includes members of all 15 families representing 58 genera. The following results are supported in our phylogenetic analyses of the data: (1) the Atypoidea (i.e., antrodiaetids, atypids, and mecicobothriids) is a monophyletic group sister to all other mygalomorphs; and (2) the families Mecicobothriidae, Hexathelidae, Cyrtaucheniidae, Nemesiidae, Ctenizidae, and Dipluridae are not monophyletic. The Microstigmatidae is likely to be subsumed into Nemesiidae.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Acta zoológica mexicana ISSN: 0065-1737 ISSN: 2448-8445 Instituto de Ecología A.C. Campuzano Granados, Emmanuel Franco; Ibarra Núñez, Guillermo; Gómez Rodríguez, José Francisco; Angulo Ordoñes, Gabriela Guadalupe Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of the tropical mountain cloud forest from El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Mexico Acta zoológica mexicana, vol. 35, e3502092, 2019 Instituto de Ecología A.C. DOI: 10.21829/azm.2019.3502092 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57564044 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative e ISSN 2448-8445 (2019) Volumen 35, 1–19 elocation-id: e3502092 https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2019.3502092 Artículo científico (Original paper) SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF THE TROPICAL MOUNTAIN CLOUD FOREST FROM EL TRIUNFO BIOSPHERE RESERVE, MEXICO ARAÑAS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) DEL BOSQUE MESÓFILO DE MONTAÑA DE LA RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA EL TRIUNFO, MÉXICO EMMANUEL FRANCO CAMPUZANO GRANADOS, GUILLERMO IBARRA NÚÑEZ*, JOSÉ FRANCISCO GÓMEZ RODRÍGUEZ, GABRIELA GUADALUPE ANGULO ORDOÑES El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Tapachula, Carr. Antiguo Aeropuerto km. 2.5, Tapachula, Chiapas, C. P. 30700, México. <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> *Autor de correspondencia: <[email protected]> Recibido: 09/10/2018; aceptado: 16/07/2019; publicado en línea: 13/08/2019 Editor responsable: Arturo Bonet Ceballos Campuzano, E. F., Ibarra-Núñez, G., Gómez-Rodríguez, J. F., Angulo-Ordoñes, G. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Arachnology 89 (Winter 2020)
    AUSTRALASIAN ARACHNOLOGY Newsletter of the Australasian Arachnological Society No. 89 Winter 2020 $5.00 2012 interview with Norman Platnick page 10 Colour and movement page 23 Mighty mites page 12 West to East page 5 Thomisids page 28 AUSTRALASIAN ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY Australasian Arachnology 89 The aim of the Australasian Arachnological Society is to Editorial Contents promote interest in the ecology, Robert Whyte and Helen Smith An ancient connection across the Pacific behaviour and taxonomy of Darko Cotoras .............................................................................................4 “An Australian arachnids of the Australasian ne particularly sad incident for our Walking sideways region. scientific community since the last Jim Hackett .................................................................................................. 8 botanist took me Membership of A$20 covers Australasian Arachnology was the untimely Interview from 2012: Norman Platnick to Springbrook four issues of Australasian O on the history of the World Spider Catalog Arachnology. ISSN 0811-3696, passing of Norman Platnick in April 2020 at the Norman Platnick interview by Robert Raven .................................................................. 10 1951-2020 see Robert National Park, where scheduled to appear three tender age of 68. MITES on Insects the other other 99% times a year. Previous issues are Norm leaves a huge legacy of work relevant to Raven’s interview with Owen Seeman ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Classification of Spiders
    18 FROM: Ubick, D., P. Paquin, P.E. Cushing, andV. Roth (eds). 2005. Spiders of North America: an identification manual. American Arachnological Society. 377 pages. Chapter 2 PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF SPIDERS Jonathan A. Coddington ARACHNIDA eyes, jumping spiders also share many other anatomical, Spiders are one of the eleven orders of the class Arach- behavioral, ecological, and physiological features. Most nida, which also includes groups such as harvestmen (Opil- important for the field arachnologist they all jump, a useful iones), ticks and mites (Acari), scorpions (Scorpiones), false bit of knowledge if you are trying to catch one. Taxonomic scorpions (Pseudoscorpiones), windscorpions (Solifugae), prediction works in reverse as well: that spider bouncing and vinegaroons (Uropygi). All arachnid orders occur in about erratically in the bushes is almost surely a salticid. North America. Arachnida today comprises approximately Another reason that scientists choose to base classifica- 640 families, 9000 genera, and 93,000 described species, but tion on phylogeny is that evolutionary history (like all his- the current estimate is that untold hundreds of thousands tory) is unique: strictly speaking, it only happened once. of new mites, substantially fewer spiders, and several thou- That means there is only one true reconstruction of evolu- sand species in the remaining orders, are still undescribed tionary history and one true phylogeny: the existing clas- (Adis & Harvey 2000, reviewed in Coddington & Colwell sification is either correct, or it is not. In practice it can be 2001, Coddington et ol. 2004). Acari (ticks and mites) are complicated to reconstruct the true phylogeny of spiders by far the most diverse, Araneae (spiders) second, and the and to know whether any given reconstruction (or classifi- remaining taxa orders of magnitude less diverse.
    [Show full text]