Waterways Of
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Battle of Valcour Island - Wikipedia
Battle of Valcour Island - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Valcour_Island Coordinates: 44°36′37.84″N 73°25′49.39″W From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The naval Battle of Valcour Island, also known as the Battle of Valcour Bay, took place on October 11, 1776, on Battle of Valcour Island Lake Champlain. The main action took place in Valcour Part of the American Revolutionary War Bay, a narrow strait between the New York mainland and Valcour Island. The battle is generally regarded as one of the first naval battles of the American Revolutionary War, and one of the first fought by the United States Navy. Most of the ships in the American fleet under the command of Benedict Arnold were captured or destroyed by a British force under the overall direction of General Guy Carleton. However, the American defense of Lake Champlain stalled British plans to reach the upper Hudson River valley. The Continental Army had retreated from Quebec to Fort Royal Savage is shown run aground and burning, Ticonderoga and Fort Crown Point in June 1776 after while British ships fire on her (watercolor by British forces were massively reinforced. They spent the unknown artist, ca. 1925) summer of 1776 fortifying those forts, and building additional ships to augment the small American fleet Date October 11, 1776 already on the lake. General Carleton had a 9,000 man Location near Valcour Bay, Lake Champlain, army at Fort Saint-Jean, but needed to build a fleet to carry Town of Peru / Town of Plattsburgh, it on the lake. -
The Time Trial of Benedict Arnold 1 National Museum of American History
The Time Trial of Benedict Arnold 1 National Museum of American History The Time Trial of Benedict Arnold Purpose By debating the legacy of Benedict Arnold, students will build reasoning and critical thinking skills and an understanding of the complexity of historical events and historical memory. Program Summary In this presentation, offered as a public program at the National Museum of American History from December 2010-April 2011, an actor portrays a fictionalized Benedict Arnold, hero and villain of the American Revolution. Arnold, in dialogue with an audience that is facilitated by an arbiter, discusses his notable actions at the Battle of Saratoga and at Valcour Island, as well as his decision to sell the plans for West Point to the British. At the conclusion of the program, audience members consider how history should remember Arnold, as a traitor, or as a hero. This set of materials is designed to provide you an opportunity to have a similar debate with your students. Included in this resource set are a full video of the program, to be used as preparation for the classroom activity, and Arnold’s conversation with the audience divided by theme, to be used with the resources offered below for your own Time Trial of Benedict Arnold. A full version of the program is available here. [https://vimeo.com/129257467] Grade levels 5-8 Time Three 45 minute periods National Standards National Center for History in the Schools: United States History Standards; Era 3: Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s); Standard 2: The impact of the American Revolution on politics, economy, and society Common Core Standards for Literacy in History and Social Studies: Speaking and Listening Standards Comprehension and Collaboration, standard 1: Grades 6-8: Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher- led) with diverse partners on grade level topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly. -
Naval Documents of the American Revolution
Naval Documents of The American Revolution Volume 6 AMERICAN THEATRE: Aug. 1, 1776–Oct. 31, 1776 EUROPEAN THEATRE: May 26, 1776–Oct. 5, 1776 Part 1 of 8 United States Government Printing Office Washington, 1972 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2012 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. NAVAL DOCUMENTS OF The American Revolution Continental Gunboat Philadelphia. NAVAL DOCUMENTS OF The American Revolution VOLUME 6 AMERICAN THEATRE: Aug. 1, 1776-Oct. 31, 1776 EUROPEAN THEATRE: May 26, 1776-Oct. 5, 1776 WILLIAM JAMES MORGAN, Editor With a Foreword by PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON And an Introduction by VICE ADMIRAL EDWIN B. HOOPER, USN (Ret.) Director of Naval History NAVAL HISTORY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON: 1972 I LC. Card No. 64-60087 I For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $18.40 domestic postpaid or $17.25 GPO Bookstore Each volume of this series is a reminder of the key role played by the late William Bell Clark, initial editor. Drawing upon his deep knowledge of the Navy in the American Revolution, his initial selections and arrangements of materials compiled over a devoted lifetime provided a framework on which subsequent efforts have continued to build. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NAVAL HISTORY James P. Baxter, I11 (Emeritus) Jim Dan Hill Samuel Flagg Bemis (Emeritus) Elmer L. Kayser Francis L. Berkeley, Jr. John Haskell Kemble Julian P. Boyd Leonard W. Labaree Marion V. -
The Battle of Saratoga to the Paris Peace Treaty
1 Matt Gillespie 12/17/03 A&HW 4036 Unit: Colonial America and the American Revolution. Lesson: The Battle of Saratoga to the Paris Peace Treaty. AIM: Why was the American victory at the Saratoga Campaign important for the American Revolution? Goals/Objectives: 1. Given factual data about the Battle of Saratoga and the Battle of Yorktown, students will be able to describe the particular events of the battles and how the Americans were able to win each battle. 2. Students will be able to recognize and explain why the battles were significant in the context of the entire war. (For example, the Battle of Saratoga indirectly leads to French assistance.) 3. Students will be able to read and interpret a key political document, The Paris peace Treaty of 1783. 4. Students will investigate key turning points in US history and explain why these events are significant. Students will be able to make arguments as to why these two battles were turning points in American history. (NYS 1.4) 5. Given the information, students will understand their historical roots and be able to reconstruct the past. Students will be able to realize how victory in these battles enabled the paris Peace Treaty to come about. (NCSS II) Main Ideas: • The campaign consists of three major conflicts. 1) The Battle of Freeman’s farm. 2) Battle of Bennington. 3) Battle of Bemis Heights. • Battle of Bennington took place on Aug. 16-17th, 1777. Burgoyne sent out Baum to take American stores at Bennington. General Stark won. • Freeman’s farm was on Sept. -
Inquiry – Benedict Arnold
Inquiry – Benedict Arnold Hook discussion question: What is betrayal? The discussion must touch on themes of loyalty and trust. Other themes may include ethics and morality. Hook visual: Presentation formula Previous Unit: The Revolutionary War will be in progress. Saratoga (1777) should have been covered. This Unit: Narrative story to present a skeletal overview of the events. Then introduce the documents, to add “muscle” to the events. Next Unit: The Revolutionary War topic will continue and be brought to conclusion. Post-Lesson Discussion prompts 1. How should we go about weighing the good someone does against the bad? At what point is one (good/bad) not balanced by the other? 2. After the war, for what reasons might the British trust or not trust Benedict Arnold? 3. In the years following the war, America tried to get England to hand over Benedict Arnold to American authorities. Should the British give him up? Why yes/no? 4. One thing missing from the discussion of betrayal and loyalty is the concept of regret. How might this relate to Arnold, Washington and others, and by what means might it be expressed? 5. How likely (or not) would it be today for one of America’s top Generals to engage in a similar traitorous act? 6. To what extent would it matter if it is a General betraying the country or a civilian acting in a traitorous manner…should these be viewed in a similar light? 7. To what extent can a person be trusted again once they have already broken your trust? 8. -
The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights. -
Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas During the American Revolution Daniel S
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-11-2019 Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution Daniel S. Soucier University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Soucier, Daniel S., "Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2992. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2992 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAVIGATING WILDERNESS AND BORDERLAND: ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE IN THE NORTHEASTERN AMERICAS DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION By Daniel S. Soucier B.A. University of Maine, 2011 M.A. University of Maine, 2013 C.A.S. University of Maine, 2016 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School University of Maine May, 2019 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-Adviser Liam Riordan, Professor of History, Co-Adviser Stephen Miller, Professor of History Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology and Canadian Studies DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Daniel S. -
The Revolution Part 7 Guide.Pdf
THE HISTORY CHANNEL® PRESENTS The Revolution: Treason and Betrayal Part 7 of a 13 part original series The American Revolution laid the foundation for the success of the United States, yet the viability of the nation was not always imminent and the quest for liberty was no simple endeavor. As the Colonists found themselves becoming increasingly independent, the fiercest and most powerful army in the world stood between them and a free, independent, sovereign America. Small skirmishes between colonists and representatives of the British throne escalated in 1775. In order to pacify what he viewed as a small rebellion, the King sent a contingent of Red Coats from the seemingly omnipotent British Army across the Atlantic Ocean. However, as the days and months progressed, the Red Coats, their military leaders and King George III himself eventually realized the ferocity, courage and collective will of the colonists they faced. The Revolution: Treason and Betrayal begins on July 4th, 1778, the second anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and a day of celebration for the Continental soldiers. Having proven their mettle at the Battle of Monmouth, the soldiers and their general, George Washington, have a renewed sense of confidence. The following year, however, will test the strength and patience of this army. Rumors of treason, the added threat of the Iroquois Nation, and the failure of the French Fleet to successfully reach the Colonies all serve to weaken the Continental Army. How will Washington maintain morale and recruit new soldiers against this adversity? Curriculum Links The Revolution: Treason and Betrayal would be useful for high school and middle school classes on United States History, Military History, European History, and Colonial History. -
A Counterintelligence Reader, Volume 1, Chapter 1
CHAPTER 1 The American Revolution and the Post-Revolutionary Era: A Historical Legacy Introduction From 1774 to 1783, the British government and its upstart American colony became locked in an increasingly bitter struggle as the Americans moved from violent protest over British colonial policies to independence As this scenario developed, intelligence and counterintelligence played important roles in Americas fight for freedom and British efforts to save its empire It is apparent that British General Thomas Gage, commander of the British forces in North America since 1763, had good intelligence on the growing rebel movement in the Massachusetts colony prior to the Battles of Lexington and Concord His highest paid spy, Dr Benjamin Church, sat in the inner circle of the small group of men plotting against the British Gage failed miserably, however, in the covert action and counterintelligence fields Gages successor, General Howe, shunned the use of intelligence assets, which impacted significantly on the British efforts General Clinton, who replaced Howe, built an admirable espionage network but by then it was too late to prevent the American colonies from achieving their independence On the other hand, George Washington was a first class intelligence officer who placed great reliance on intelligence and kept a very personal hand on his intelligence operations Washington also made excellent use of offensive counterintelligence operations but never created a unit or organization to conduct defensive counterintelligence or to coordinate its -
Book Reviews ……………………………………
IN THIS ISSUE ........................................................ Book Reviews …………………………………….. Charles Fish, In the Land of the Wild Onion: Travels along Vermont’s Winooski River. Helen Husher 176 Robert McCullough, Crossings: A History of Vermont Bridges. Leslie Goat 178 James L. Nelson, Benedict Arnold’s Navy: The Ragtag Fleet that Lost the Battle of Lake Champlain but Won the American Revolution. Art Cohn 181 Peter Benes, Ed., Slavery/Antislavery in New England. Annual Proceedings of the Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife, Volume 28. Jane Williamson 183 Jeffrey Marshall, The Inquest. John A. Leppman 185 C. J. King, Four Marys and a Jessie: The Story of the Lincoln Women. Melanie Gustafson 187 Cynthia D. Bittinger, Grace Coolidge: Sudden Star (A Volume in the Presidential Wives Series). Deborah P. Clifford 189 Sarah Seidman and Patricia Wiley, Middlesex in the Making; History and Memories of a Small Vermont Town. Hans Raum 191 BOOK REVIEWS ........................................................ In the Land of the Wild Onion: Travels along Vermont’s Winooski River By Charles Fish (Burlington: University of Vermont Press and Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 2006, pp. 253, $29.95). harles Fish’s book about the natural and cultural history of the Wi- C nooski River begins at the beginning—the headwaters in Cabot— and then winds like the river itself, flowing through personal conversa- tions, observations, and descriptions of small-boat handling (and mis- handling), to regional ecology, the inner workings of sewer plants, and the economic and social dynamics of mills. Fish introduces us to the to- pology of the Winooski Valley and to delicious terms like “fluvial geo- morphology” (p. -
Tactical Implementation of Strategic Guidance During the American Revolutionary War: Pedagogical Application for Classroom Use Ryan Menath
University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2018 Tactical Implementation Of Strategic Guidance During The American Revolutionary War: Pedagogical Application For Classroom Use Ryan Menath Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Menath, Ryan, "Tactical Implementation Of Strategic Guidance During The American Revolutionary War: Pedagogical Application For Classroom Use" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2285. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2285 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIC GUIDANCE DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY WAR: PEDAGOGICAL APPLICATION FOR CLASSROOM USE by Lieutenant Colonel Ryan Thomas Menath Bachelor of Science, United States Air Force Academy, 2001 Master of Arts, American Military University, 2012 A Final Project Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Arts Grand Forks, North Dakota May 2018 The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. -
Valiant Ambition: George Washington, Benedict Arnold, and the Fate of the American Revolution
Valiant Ambition: George Washington, Benedict Arnold, and the Fate of the American Revolution Benedict Arnold was a talented military strategist who had led forces to victories at Fort Ticonderoga, on Lake Champlain, at Fort Stanwix, and in the battle of Saratoga. While recognizing Arnold’s abilities, George Washington feared that the young officer was at times too bold on the battlefield. Washington cautioned him in March 1777, “Unless your strength and circumstances be such, that you can reasonably promise yourself a moral certainty of succeeding, confine yourself in the main to a defensive opposition”. Seven months later, at the Second Battle of Saratoga at Bemis Heights near the Hudson River, Arnold so recklessly waved his sword that it pierced the head of an American officer. Hours later, he led a charge of riflemen that proved to be decisive in winning the battle. Upon demanding the enemy’s surrender, a German soldier fired a musket ball into Arnold’s leg, killing his horse. According to Philbrick, the war effort was marred by division in the colonies, an incompetent Congress under the Articles of Confederation, and weak executive power. In February 1778, Washington authored a plan to reorganize the Army but its implementation was slow. He told Congress of the harsh conditions his men faced, often being poorly clothed and sleeping “under frost and snow”. They displayed a “patience and obedience which could scarce be paralleled”. Throughout the war, Congress possessed the power to name officers. In 1777, when Benedict Arnold was denied promotion to Major General, Washington feared that he would overreact.