political events of the second half of the did not tire of reading of his and his Random Curves: 20th century: The Cold War, but also the wife Ann Hibner’s happiness (she a quality of life in the former Soviet math historian with a profound Kova- Journeys of a Union; the American aggression in levskaia biography [7] and prolific Vietnam, but also the charisma of the anthropologist and gender researcher), solidarity and liberation movements; about their travels, their organiza- Mathematician racism and civil rights movements; tional work, their endowments, their by Neal Koblitz suppression in Africa and Latin America encounters with so many interesting, and counter forces; injustice, stupidity, impressing and sympathetic people BERLIN, HEIDELBERG: SPRINGER SCIENCE + brutality, arrogance of power—and the around the world. Koblitz is a good BUSINESS MEDIA, 2008, 392 PP., US $34.95, tactics and strength of the suppressed writer: People are described in a lively ISBN 978-3-540-74077-3 and how best to support them. Nothing way, with a lot of humor, but always REVIEWED BY BERNHELM BOOSS-BAVNBEK passes without getting Koblitz’s well- with high respect, whether he recalls argued ‘‘Another Look’’, be it a deserved the words of a schoolboy in rural Peru All men of any condition who have rap for widely accepted conditions or a or of the Vietnamese Prime Minister. done something of special worth or positive explanation of widely rejected This human touch hopefully reconciles something that may truly resemble circumstances. He is highly opinionated even a conservative reader who other- those things of special merit, should, and displays a total absence of the wise may feel repelled by the hard if they are truthful and good people, politeness associated to fashionable inexorable logic of Koblitz’s political write in their own hand the story of social constructivism and relativism. arguing. their lives, but they should not begin Throughout the book, Koblitz is There is not much about mathemat- such a fine undertaking until they opinionated with good reason: He ics in the book, just a few rather sketchy have passed the age of 40. writes only of things he seems to have comments about Koblitz’s personal investigated thoroughly, and he is, path into number theory at Harvard, more than most, aware of possible fatal Princeton and Moscow; then just 32 ith this verdict, the Renais- consequences of careless disregard for pages on his seminal work on elliptic sance goldsmith and sculptor logic and truth. There is no tolerance curve cryptography (ECC) and his con- WWBenvenuto Cellini (1500– for superficial political thinking. Thought- tinuing vendetta against claims by the 1571) opened his own autobiography lessness is perceived by Koblitz as proponents of the mainstream public- [3, p. 5], probably composed between almost worse than bad will or selfish- key cryptography algorithm RSA; and, 1558 and 1567. Neal Koblitz, the author ness, like the saying: ‘‘It is terrible to be finally, 21 pages on elementary math of the autobiographical memoirs Ran- knocked down by a car, but much education and math teacher education. dom Curves, is such a Renaissance more terrible to be trampled down by Contrary to model autobiographies like personality: A renowned top mathe- a hundred geese.’’ As in grading math- Norbert Wiener’s I Am a Mathemati- matician, a prolific author of widely ematical exercises, Koblitz vigorously cian [9] which enthusiastically discusses used text books in number theory and discloses the slightest weakness in com- control theory, prediction, Fourier cryptography, a harsh, polemic writer mon arguments; and as in mathemati- analysis and brain research, or Mark (also for 30 years for this magazine) cal proofs, and contrary to common Kac’s Enigma of Chance [6] which against ‘‘mathematics as propaganda,’’ political arguing and military tactics, explores the interface between different on elementary school mathematics Koblitz always attacks his adversaries’ fields of mathematics and statistical teaching, and on the mathematical strongest positions. That makes read- mechanics and explains, for example, and general cultural life in developing ing Random Curves sometimes offend- the combinatorial rules of phase transi- countries. ing, often demanding, but always tion, Koblitz seems convinced by Mark No doubt, Koblitz has both ‘‘done rewarding. Kac’s proclamation [6, p. xiii]: ‘‘The something of special worth’’ in his sci- Koblitz also displays a warm and autobiography of a mathematician must entific work and ‘‘something that may human enlightened self-interest asso- contain some mathematics. Yet a pre- truly resemble those things of special ciated with his extensive work for sentation in popular form of some of the merit,’’ though contrary to Cellini’s glo- solidarity and charity. He doesn’t problems and ideas with which I have rification of the bloody contemporary underplay the contradiction between been involved throughout my life is Florentine Medici dictatorship, Koblitz his almost hedonistic life as a highly unfortunately an impossible task.’’ praises the rights and the virtues of the gifted, tenured, respected and well- Nevertheless, Kac tried. That was good. suppressed, minorities, women, chil- paid university professor in mathe- Koblitz did not really try. That is a pity. dren. Another title for his book could matics and the miserable circum- Surely, Koblitz may have had good have been Another Look at Enlightened stances of the people he tries to help. reasons for that restraint. He describes Self-Interest: Because that is what the Random Curves is not so much about his life-long fight against overhyped book is about. his own sacrifices, renunciation, risks, ideas, often connected to improper For most of its pages, Random punishments (though they are there), numericity, when people dress up Curves delivers a long and fascinating as about the emotional reward for his poor understanding or even fraudulent array of very sharp, personal and un- political activism and the wide range of arguments by slick, pompous, false compromising comments on the great possibilities an individual really has: I and misleading manipulation of logic