Sanction of Projects S. Name of the Date of Amount State No. Project Sanction Sanctioned (lakhs) 1 Rallapadu 19 –12–2015 36.18 AP 2 Peddavagu 19 –12–2015 36.18 TS 3 Torrigadda 20 –01-2016 36.18 AP 4 Thatipudi 20 –01-2016 36.18 AP 5 Guntur Channel 20 –01-2016 36.18 AP 6 Vengalarayasagaram 20 –01-2016 36.18 AP 7 Vattivagu 20 –01-2016 36.18 TS 8 Thaliperu 20 –01-2016 36.18 TS 9 Sathnala 20 –01-2016 36.18 TS 10 Musi 20 –01-2016 36.18 TS Medium Irrigation Projects - State Sl. Name of the Name of the Project No. District 1 Musi Project Nalgonda 2 Peddavagu Project Khammam 3 Sathnala Project Adilabad 4 Thaliperu Project Khammam 5 Vattivagu Project Adilabad

Medium Irrigation Projects - Sl. Name of the Name of the Project No. District 1 Guntur Channel Project Guntur 2 Rallapadu Project Prakasam 3 Thatipudi Project Vizianagaram 4 Torrigedda Project East Godavari 5 Vengalarayasagaram Project Vizianagaram Locations of Ten Medium Irrigation Projects Dr. B. Krishna Rao Director (Agriculture& Research)

Telangana State Andhra Pradesh Team Team

K. Sunitha A. Sailaja (DEE) (ADA)

A. Srinivas Goud V. Anil Kumar Reddy (AEE) (AEE)

H. Sandeep K. Sushanth B. Sumanth Reddy P. Sravanthi (RA) Ch. Krishna (RA) (SRF) Reddy (SRF) (SRF) Planning workshops S. No. Name of the Project Date of Planning No. of Officials Workshop Attended 1 Rallapadu 23 – 01 - 2016 19 2 Peddavagu 23 – 01 - 2016 3 Musi 19 – 04 - 2016 4 Vattivagu 19 – 04 - 2016 35 5 Thaliperu 19 – 04 - 2016 6 Sathnala 19 – 04 - 2016 7 Torrigadda 20 – 04 - 2016 8 Thatipudi 20 – 04 - 2016 26 9 Guntur Channel 20 – 04 - 2016 10 Vengalarayasagaram 20 – 04 - 2016 Workshops at WALAMATARI Project visit & Stakeholder Workshops S.No Name of the Project Date of Project Visit and Venue Stakeholder Workshops 1 Rallapadu 9th &10th, February, 2016 Kandukuru, AP 2 Peddavagu 23rd & 24th , February, 2016 Gummadivalli, TS 3 Guntur Channel 9th &10th, June, 2016 Lam Farm, AP 4 Sathnala 20th & 21st , June, 2016 Adilabad, TS 5 Musi 27th & 28th , June, 2016 Suryapet, TS 6 Vattivagu 4th & 5th , July, 2016 Asifabad, TS 7 Vengalarayasagaram 18th & 19th , July, 2016 Makkuva, AP 8 Thatipudi 20th & 21st , July, 2016 Vizianagaram, AP 9 Torrigadda 25th & 26th , July, 2016 Seethanagaram, AP 10 Thaliperu 3rd & 4th , August, 2016 Cherla, TS Visit to various projects Visit to various projects Stakeholder Workshops Stakeholder Workshops Water Use Efficiency (WUE) Measures

S. No WUE Measure 1 Reservoir Efficiency

2 Conveyance Efficiency

3 On-Farm Application Efficiency

4 Drainage Efficiency

5 IPU and IPC S. No Studies/ Experiment Use of Study 1 Canal Gauging Study Conveyance Efficiency 2 Ponding Method in Branch Watercourse Conveyance Efficiency (seepage losses) 3 Infiltration Study OFAE 4 Percolation Study OFAE 5 Sprinkler Experiment OFAE 6 Drip Experiment OFAE 7 On farm Application Study OFAE 8 Crop Ground Truth Survey (Kharif and Rabi) Crop Classification (Cropped Area) 9 Canal Network - 10 Command Boundary Delineation - 11 Socio-Economic Survey Annexure- A 12 Water Sample Collection To assess Water Quality Matrix form of project area Reservoir Efficiency • Inflows (Inflows+ Rainfall) • Outflows (Withdrawals, Spill over, Drinking, Data Evaporation, Seepage) Required • Storage levels

• Outflows (Withdrawals, Spill over, Drinking Reservoir etc.,) • Storage levels Efficiency Reported • Inflows

• Water Spread Area • Reservoir Filling Efficiency Calculated

Maximum live storage attained in the Reservoir Filling Efficiency = reservoir in a particular year The designed Live Storage of Reservoir •Evaporation data is taken from Nearest Station • Seepage is taken from Journal (Standards for Seepage loss in Ponds and Reservoir) Methodology for Water Spread Area Water spread area is a major factor for calculating the seepage and evaporation losses in the reservoir. It can be estimated by analyzing the areal spread of the reservoir at different elevation over a period of time using satellite image data.

22-02-2014 (LC08_L1TP_141047_20140222_20170425_01_T1) Path – 141 Row – 47 Water Spread Area and Capacity of Thatipudi Reservoir in Different Dates of Satellite pass Date of Elevation Area Capacity Capacity S. No. Satellite (Ft) (Km2) (Mcft) (Mm3) Pass 1 06.02.2008 292.0 9.1977 2750.0 77.8716 2 03.06.2010 265.8 3.7805 690.0 19.5387 3 03.04.2011 294.4 9.4436 3000.0 84.950 4 06.06.2011 293.0 9.2251 2850.0 80.703 5 26.09.2011 294.6 9.5305 3025.0 85.6588 6 28.10.2011 291.9 9.009 2740.0 77.5885 7 11.02.2013 295.1 9.604 3087.5 87.4286 8 15.09.2013 287.5 8.2816 2300.0 65.129 9 22.02.2014 292.5 9.225 2800.0 79.2875 10 10.03.2014 291.8 8.8402 2730.0 77.3053 11 11.04.2014 290.2 8.728 2570.0 72.774 12 13.05.2014 288.0 8.5638 2350 66.5449 Conveyance Efficiency Studies done for calculating Conveyance Efficiency

1. Canal gauging Study 2. Seepage losses by Inflow- Outflow Method in Main course 3. Seepage losses by Ponding Method in Branch Watercourse 1. Canal Gauging study OBJECTIVE The main objective of conducting Canal Gauging study is to find the carrying capacity of the canal. • As per guidelines of CWC, 10 % of the total length of main canals, distributaries and minors were selected. • Project the study was carried out for 2 times in the crop season. The criteria for selection of representatives of study area are shown in below: ❖No weed growth ❖ No curvatures ❖ No drawers ❖ Regular section ❖ weed and silt should be removed at least 10m on both sides of the selected point VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS BY CURRENT METER ❖ Wading (When depth and Velocity Permits) method VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS BY CURRENT METER ❖ Measurement through Boat VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS BY CURRENT METER ❖ Measurement with a support of Bridge VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS BY CURRENT METER ❖ Procedure: Measure the width of the water surface and divide the stream into number of verticals/compartments VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS BY CURRENT METER

Measuring Depth Across the section Spin Checking

Positioning the Current meter Counter Setting Status of Canal Gauging Studies for 10 projects S.No Name of the Status of the study in Status of the study in Project 2016-17 2017-18 1 Rallapadu No Water in the Reservoir No water in the Reservoir

2 Peddavagu Completed Completed 3 Guntur Channel Completed Completed 4 Sathnala Completed Completed 5 Musi Completed Completed 6 Vattivagu Completed Completed 7 Vengalarayasagar Completed Completed

8 Thatipudi Completed Completed 9 Torrigadda Completed Completed

10 Thaliperu Completed Completed 2.Seepage losses study using Inflow-Outflow Method ❖ Seepage losses are calculated by measuring the inflow, outflow and evaporation losses of each selected canal segment. ❖ Seepage losses = Inflow-Outflow-Evaporation losses 3.Seepage losses study using Ponding Method ❖Method of bund formation Measuring water depths and water surface widths Status of Seepage Study for 10 Projects

S.No Name of the Project Status of the study

1 Rallapadu Completed 2 Guntur Channel Completed 3 Vengalarayasagar Completed 4 Thatipudi Completed 5 Torrigadda Completed 6 Musi Completed 7 Vattivagu Completed 8 Sathnala Completed 9 Peddavagu Completed 10 Thaliperu Completed On-Farm Application Efficiency Infiltration study Objective: The main objective of using Infiltrometer is to measure the rate of water infiltrated into soil or other porous media. Status of Infiltration Studies for 10 Projects S.No Name of the Project Status of the study

1 Rallapadu Completed 2 Peddavagu Completed 3 Guntur Channel Completed 4 Sathnala Completed 5 Musi Completed 6 Vattivagu Completed 7 Vengalarayasagar Completed 8 Thatipudi Completed 9 Torrigadda Completed 10 Thaliperu Completed Percolation study

Objective To determine the percolation losses in the Paddy fields using Bowman tubes in the command area of the project. Calculation Percolation losses + evaporation losses = H4-H1 (in cm)

H1

H 2 H3

H 4 Where Bowman tube H1-water level in the Bowman tube on 1st day H2-water level in the Bowman tube on 2nd day H3-water level in the Bowman tube on 3rd day H4-water level in the Bowman tube on 4th day Status of Percolation Studies for 10 Projects

S.N Name of the Project Status of the study Remarks o 1 Rallapadu Completed - 2 Guntur Channel Completed - 3 Vengalarayasagaram Completed - 4 Thatipudi Completed - 5 Torrigadda Completed - 6 `Musi Completed - 7 Vattivagu Completed - 8 Sathnala - No Paddy field 9 Peddavagu Completed - 10 Thaliperu Completed - Sprinkler and Drip Experiment

❖As per guidelines, data for 10 % of representative area under Sprinkler or Drip irrigation system under command area is collected Status of Sprinkler and Drip Studies for 10 Projects

S.No Name of the Project Status of the study Remarks

1 Rallapadu Completed - 2 Guntur Channel Completed - 3 Vengalarayasagaram Completed - 4 Thatipudi Completed - 5 Torrigadda Completed - 6 `Musi Completed - 7 Vattivagu Completed - 8 Sathnala Completed - 9 Peddavagu Completed - 10 Thaliperu Completed - IPC and IPU Objective:

❖To analyse this, 10 years data of IPC and IPU, crop and cropping pattern data is collected from Project authorities and line departments and it is found that cropped area in IPO-9 and in IPO-13 are not realistic.

❖To get the actual picture of the cropped area in the command of the project, the satellite data is used, with the help of National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC) as satellite data gives more authentic information. Cropped area, Crop Classification and Crop Condition

25 oct 2016 10 nov 2016 26 nov 2016 Kharif Crop Classification 2016-2017 for Thatipudi Project S. Name of No. of points No. of points No the Project collected collected (Kharif) (Rabi) 1 Rallapadu No water in 33 reservoir 2 Guntur 138 53 Channel 3 Vengalaraya 138 42 sagaram 4 Thatipudi 99 40 5 Torrigadda 85 60 6 Musi 82 120 7 Vattivagu 129 80 8 Sathnala 105 52 9 Peddavagu 182 45 Khariff Crop Ground truth 10 Thaliperu 149 43 Points Status of IIW for 10 Projects

S.No Name of the Project Status of the study 1 Rallapadu Completed 2 Peddavagu Completed 3 Guntur Channel Completed 4 Sathnala Completed 5 Musi Completed 6 Vattivagu Completed 7 Vengalarayasagar Completed 8 Thatipudi Completed 9 Torrigadda Completed 10 Thaliperu Completed RESULTS VATTIVAGU PROJECT

Location of Vattivagu project in map VATTIVAGU PROJECT

Front view of Vattivagu dam (spillway) Front view of Vattivagu reservoir

Mining Waste dumping by singareni colleries near Vattivagu project VATTIVAGU PROJECT

Reservoir Filling Efficiency

Gross Storage : 2895 Mcuft

Live Storage: 2610 Mcuft 120.00

Maximum live Reservoir Filling 100.00

Year storage Efficiency (%) 80.00 2008-09 2165.93 82.99 60.00 2009-10 1012.59 38.80 40.00 Efficiency (%) Efficiency 20.00 2010-11 2847.81 109.11 0.00 2011-12 2721.57 104.27 2012-13 2847.81 109.11 Year 2013-14 2763.22 105.87 2014-15 2659.92 101.91 • Average Reservoir filling efficiency 93% 2015-16 2148.340 82.31 2016-17 2826.5 108.30 VATTIVAGU MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT VATTIVAGU PROJECT

Conveyance Efficiency (%) Main canals 69.39 Distributaries 87.49 Minors 96

Observations : •Damaged lining of Canals and Distributories •Heavy weed growth in canals •Damaged structures •Most of the distributories are damaged , unlined. VATTIVAGU PROJECT

Weed growth in RMC Distributary D4 Velocity measurement at head reach

Weed growth in RMC Damaged lining in RMC Distributary D4 VATTIVAGU MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT VATTIVAGU PROJECT

IPC and IPU:

Irrigation Irrigation Year Potential Potential % Utilization Created Utilised 2007-08 17000 273.2 1.6 2008-09 17000 449 2.6 2009-10 20000 14220 71.1 2010-11 20000 14705 73.5 2011-12 24500 20,660 84.3 2012-13 24500 20,000 81.6 2013-14 24500 20,000 81.6 2014-15 24500 20,000 81.6 2015-16 24500 15,500 63.3 2016-17 24500 13,000 53.1 VATTIVAGU MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT VATTIVAGU PROJECT IPC and IPU (2016-17): Irrigation Irrigation Potential Irrigation Potential Potential Utilised from Project Utilised from Remote Created Officials (Acres) sensing (Acres) (Acres) 24500 13000 20511.81

Paddy Cotton VATTIVAGU PROJECT

Cropped area (Acres) S. No Crop Type Two seasonal Kharif Rabi crops Annual crop 1Cotton 10811.32 - 2Paddy 6361.17 3339.32 - Total 6361.17 3339.32 10811.32 - SATHNALA PROJECT SATHNALA PROJECT

Location of Sathnala project in map SATHNALA PROJECT

 Sathnala Dam

Sathnala Spillway Sathnala Reservoir SATHNALA MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT SATHNALA PROJECT

Reservoir Filling Efficiency

Gross Storage : 1347.35 Mcuft 120 Live Storage: 1240.68 Mcuft 100 Maximum live Reservoir Filling Year storage Efficiency 80 2008-09 1204.325 97.07 60 2009-10 677.546 54.61

2010-11 1215.688 97.99 (%) Efficiency 40

2011-12 1215.688 97.99 20 2012-13 1240.688 100.00 0 2013-14 1204.325 97.07

2014-15 1180.596 95.16 Year 2015-16 1180.596 95.16 • Average Reservoir filling efficiency 92.6% 2016-17 1227.05 98.90 SATHNALA MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT SATHNALA PROJECT

Conveyance Efficiency (%) Main canals 93 Distributaries 94 Minors 96

Observations : •Silt formation in canals and Distributories •Damaged lining of Canals and Distributories •weed growth in canals SATHNALA PROJECT

Heavy bush growth in right main canal Silt,weeds and stones blockage in Left main canal at SLB SATHNALA MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT SATHNALA PROJECT

IPC and IPU

Irrigation Irrigation Year Potential Potential % Utilization Created Utilised

2011-12 24000 7000 29.2 2012-13 24000 7000 29.2 2013-14 24000 7500 31.3 2014-15 24000 8000 33.3 2015-16 24000 14000 58.3 2016-17 24000 14000 58.3 SATHNALA MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT SATHNALA PROJECT IPC and IPU (2016-17) Irrigation Irrigation Potential Utilised from Potential Project Officials (Acres) Created (Acres) 24000 14000

Cotton Soyabean SATHNALA PROJECT

S. No Crop Type Cropped Area (acres) Kharif Rabi Two Annual Seasonal crop crops 1 Cotton - - 14959.67 - 2 Bengal gram - 3343.90 - - 3 Soyabean and 3923.25 - - - other crops 4 Wheat and - 1861.54 - - other crops Total 3923.25 5205.75 14959.67 - VENGALARAYASAGARAM PROJECT VENGALARAYASAGARAM PROJECT

Location of Vengalarayasagaram project in map VENGALARAYASAGARAM PROJECT

Spillway of VRS project (D/s) WALAMTARI team with project officials at VRS project VENGALARAYASAGARAM PROJECT

Reservoir Filling Efficiency

Gross Storage : 1660 Mcuft 100 Live Storage: 1495 Mcuft 90 80 Maximum live Reservoir Filling (%) 70 Year storage Efficiency 60 50

2013 1118.22 75 40 Efficiency 30 2014 1290.5 86 20 10 2015 1283 86 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 1349.8 90 Year

• Average Reservoir filling efficiency 84 % VENGALARAYASAGARAM PROJECT

Conveyance Efficiency (%) Main canals 92 Distributaries 73 Minors 64

Observations : •Main canals are lined •Most of the distributaries are damaged , unlined. VENGALARAYASARAM MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT VENGALARAYASAGARAM PROJECT

IPC and IPU

Irrigation Potensial Created Irrigation Irrigation Irrigation Potensial Year Potential Potential % Utilization Utilised Created Utilised 25000

24000 2012-13 24700 23219 94.00 23000

2013-14 24700 22230 90.00 22000

21000 2014-15 24700 20998 85.01 potential(acres) Irrigation

20000 2015-16 24700 22650 91.70 19000 2016-17 24700 22971 93.00 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 YEAR VENGALARAYASAGARAM PROJECT

S. No Crop Type Cropped Area (acres) Kharif Rabi Annual crop 1 Paddy 16937 - - 2 Sugarcane - - 2779 3 Pulses - 13585 - 4 Other crops - 2919 -

Total 16937 16504 2779

Crop Classification- Kharif (2016-17) Crop Classification– Rabi (2016-17) THATIPUDI PROJECT THATIPUDI PROJECT

Location of Thatipudi project in map THATIPUDI PROJECT

 Sathnala Dam

Thatipudi Spillway Thatipudi Reservoir THATIPUDI MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT THATIPUDI PROJECT

Reservoir Filling Efficiency

Gross Storage : 3325 Mcuft 100 Live Storage: 3175 Mcuft 90 80 Maximum live Reservoir Filling 70 Year storage Efficiency 60 2007-08 2953 93.01 50

Efficiency( %)Efficiency( 40 2008-09 2490 78.43 30 20 2009-10 1045 32.91 2010-11 3150 99.21 Year 2011-12 3037.5 95.67 2012-13 3137 98.80 2013-14 3000 94.49 • Average Reservoir filling efficiency 94% 2014-15 3025 95.28 THATIPUDI PROJECT

Irrigation Irrigation Irrigation Year PotensialC PotensialU % Utilization IPC vs IPU PotensialCreated reated tilised 18000 Irrigation 2007-08 15366 15365 100 16000 PotensialUtilised

2008-09 15366 15209 99 14000 12000 2009-10 15366 14000 91 10000

2010-11 15366 15288 99 8000 6000 2011-12 15366 15366 100

4000 Irrigation potential(acres) Irrigation 2012-13 15366 15366 100 2000 0 2013-14 15366 12453 81

2014-15 15366 13500 88 YEAR 2015-16 15366 14738 96

2016-17 15366 13754 90 THATIPUDI PROJECT

S. No Crop Cropped Area (acres) Type Kharif Rabi Annual crop 1 Paddy 18566.2 - - 2 Sugarcane - - 5183.39

3 Pulses - 17881.17 - Total 18566.2 17881.17 5183.39

Crop Classification- Kharif (2016-17) Crop Classification– Rabi (2016-17) MUSI PROJECT MUSI PROJECT

Location of Musi project in map MUSI MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT MUSI PROJECT

Reservoir Filling Efficiency

Live Storage: 4469.78 Mcuft 120.00 Maximum live Reservoir Filling 100.00 Year storage Efficiency 80.00

2006-07 4447.19 99.49 60.00

2007-08 4447.19 99.49 40.00 Efficiency Efficiency (%) 2008-09 4286.20 95.89 20.00 - 2009-10 3847.00 86.07 2010-11 4447.19 99.49 Year 2011-12 3131.75 70.06 2012-13 4339.51 97.09 • Average Reservoir filling efficiency 94% 2013-14 4433.65 99.19 2014-15 2846.60 63.69 2015-16 4325.65 96.78 MUSI PROJECT

Conveyance Efficiency (%) Main canals 92

Observations : •Main canals are lined •Most of the distributaries are damaged , unlined. •Poor operation and maintenance MUSI MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT MUSI PROJECT

IPC vs IPU

Irrigation Irrigation Year Potential Potential % Utilization Created Utilised

2006-2007 33066 28734.75 86.90 2007-2008 33066 28734.75 86.90 2008-2009 33066 27044.33 81.79 2009-2010 33066 18718.43 56.61 2010-2011 33066 22534.88 68.15 2011-2012 33066 12018.6 36.35 2012-2013 33066 22480.43 67.99 2013-2014 33066 23037.3 69.67 MUSI PROJECT

S. Cropped Area (ha) Crop Type No Two Seasonal Annual Kharif Rabi crops crop 1 Paddy 8126 14877 - - 2 Cotton 8356.26 - - - 3 Pulses 3943.64 - - - Total 20425.9 14877

Crop Classification- Kharif (2016-17) Crop Classification– Rabi (2016-17) TALIPERU PROJECT

Location of Taliperu project in map MUSI MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT TALIPERU PROJECT

Reservoir Filling Efficiency

Live Storage: 730.19 Mcuft Live Storage: 510.69 Mcuft 144 Maximum live Reservoir Filling 142 Year storage Efficiency 140 2010 730.19 142.98 138 2011 728.372 142.63 136 2012 730.19 142.98 134 Efficiency Efficiency (%) 132 2013 730.19 142.98 130 2014 730.19 142.98 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2015 724.558 141.88 Year 2016 692.068 135.52 • Average Reservoir filling efficiency 141.70% Observations: ➢ Every year reservoir fills 10 to 12 times due to high rainfall in the catchment area (Average annual rainfall 1045 mm). MUSI MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT TALIPERU PROJECT

IPC vs IPU

Irrigation Irrigation Year Potential Potential % Utilization Created Utilised 2005-06 24700 15000 60.73 2006-07 24700 15000 60.73 2007-08 24700 15000 60.73 2008-09 24700 15000 60.73 2009-10 24700 11500 46.56 2010-11 24700 11500 46.56 2011-12 24700 11500 46.56 2012-13 24700 12000 48.58 2013-14 24700 12000 48.58 2014-15 24700 21000 85.02 TALIPERU PROJECT

Cropped Area (acres) S. Crop Two Annual No Type Kharif Rabi Seasonal crop crops 1 Paddy 7809.93 3464.24 - - 2 Cotton - - 3338.09 - 3 Chillies - - 2901.43 - Total 7809.93 3464.24 6239.52 -

Crop Classification- Kharif (2016-17) Crop Classification– Rabi (2016-17) PEDDAVAGU PROJECT

Location of Peddavagu project in map MUSI MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT PEDDAVAGU PROJECT

Reservoir Filling Efficiency Live Storage: 557.89 Mcuft Live Storage: 489.46 Mcuft 120 Maximum live Reservoir Filling 100 Year storage Efficiency 2004 523.927 107.04 80 2005 557.89 113.98 60 2006 557.89 113.98 40 2007 557.89 113.98 2008 517.634 105.76 20

2009 420.485 85.91 Efficiency( %) 0 2010 557.89 113.98 2011 557.89 113.98 Year 2012 557.89 113.98 2013 557.89 113.98 • Average Reservoir filling efficiency 110.65% 2014 557.89 113.98 2015 557.89 113.98 2016 557.89 113.98 MUSI MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT PEDDAVAGU PROJECT

IPC vs IPU

Irrigation Irrigation Year Potential Potential % Utilization Created Utilised 2004-05 16000 5850 36.56 2005-06 16000 5600 35 2006-07 16000 5800 36.25 2007-08 16000 5400 33.75 2008-09 16000 5500 34.38 2009-10 16000 5500 34.38 2010-11 16000 5450 34.06 2011-12 16000 5500 34.38 2012-13 16000 5600 35 2013-14 16000 5500 34.38 PEDDAVAGU PROJECT Cropped Area (acres) S. Crop Two Seasonal Annual No Type Kharif Rabi crops crop 1 Paddy 19329.58 8574 - - 2 Cotton - - 8261.77 - 3 Chillies - - 7181.03 - Total 19329.58 8574 15442.81 -

Crop Classification- Kharif (2016-17) Crop Classification– Rabi (2016-17) GUNTUR PROJECT

Location of Guntur project in map GUNTUR PROJECT

KondaVetti Vagu

Guntur Channel location (Source: Bhuvan portal) GUNTUR CHANNEL

• Guntur channel system is a multipurpose project, a diversion scheme on near Prakasam barrage, Vijayawada. •It runs for a length of 47.00 km from the Head Regulator near Polakampadu village, Tadepalli mandal, Guntur district. •Designed discharge of Guntur channel is 600 cusecs. •The supplies for this channel are being drawn from the Krishna river and surplus water of Kondavetti Vagu through the existing regulator located in the Undavalli-Vaikuntapuram flood bank on the right side of the river Krishna. •The Guntur channel also serves drinking water needs for 32 summer storage tanks in the district and to Guntur Municipal Corporation. • As a contour canal, Guntur channel was served for 27,000 acres. •This project was designed for Kharif (Paddy) •The ayacut under this scheme which was producing cores like Jowar, groundnuts and commercial crops like chillies, cotton etc., was localized as fully wet GUNTUR PROJECT

S. Crop Type Cropped Area (acres) No Kharif Rabi Two Seasonal crops Annual crop 1 Paddy 14686.96 - - - 2 Non Paddy 15101.5 - - - 3 Pulses - 11548 - - 4 Non Pulses - 14279 - - Total 29788.5 25828 - -

Crop Classification- Kharif (2016-17) Crop Classification– Rabi (2016-17) RALLAPADU PROJECT

Location of Rallapadu project in map RALLAPADU PROJECT

Rallapdu project location (Source: Bhuvan portal) RALLAPADU PROJECT  Rallapadu is a medium irrigation project constructed across Manneru River near Rallapadu village in Lingasamudram Mandal of Prakasam District .  The scheme is originally designed for Paddy, sugarcane and Maize crops with an extent of 16000 acres.  The Rallapadu project system comprises of a 23.14 kms length of Main canal, 14.55 kms of distributary system. Water and Land Management Training and Research Institute

RALLAPADU PROJECT IPU calculated from Remote sensing ( Satellite imageries) is S. Crop Cropped Area (acres) No Type Kharif Rabi Two Seasonal Annual crops crop 1 Paddy - 2150.65 - - 2 Non - 3621.69 - - Paddy Total - 5772.35 - -

Observations:  Due to non availability of water in the Rallapadu reservoir, the cropped area of the project is only 5772.35 acres is supplemented through wells, Bore wells, tanks and natural drains etc. RALLAPADU PROJECT

Crop Classification– Rabi (2016-17) TORRIGADDA PROJECT

Location of Torrigadda project in map TORRIGADDA PROJECT  Torrigadda Pumping scheme is a Medium Irrigation Project constructed on Akhanda in Godavari basin situated in between 41.400 km to 41.600 km near Purushottapatnam village in Seethanagaram Mandal of .  The river is a perennial river and assured water is available for the scheme and as such there is no scarcity of water for pumping during Kharif season.  The water allocated and utilized is 70.75 Mm3 (2.50 TMC).  The scheme envisages lifting of water from Godavari with a pumping head of 11.88 meters to irrigate an extent of 5380 Ha (13451 acres) at 70 Duty. The project serves 14 villages in Seethanagaram and Korukonda mandals of East Godavari District Water and Land Management Training and Research Institute

IPU calculated from Remote sensing ( Satellite imageries) Cropped Area (acres) S. Crop TypeTORRIGADDA PROJECTTwo Seasonal Annual No Kharif Rabi crops crop 1 Paddy 9088.05 - - - 2 Pulses 5451.361 8550 - - 3 Sugarcane - - - 1212 4 Maize - - - - Total 14539.41 8550 1212

Crop Classification- Kharif (2016-17) Crop Classification– Rabi (2016-17) On farm and Drainage efficiencies

 The study area is selected, and parshall flumes are being installed in the selected locations.  On farm and drainage studies have to be done for the Kharif (2018-19) and Rabi (2019-2020) seasons. So, to proceed further with the studies extension of project period for one more year upto June 2020 is required.

Expenditure Particulars upto 23.02.2019 Sl. No. Details Toatl Amount in Rs. Sanctioned Amount 1 36,18,000 (Rs.)/Project Sanctioned Amount (Rs.)/ 2 3,61,80,000 10 Projects 3 Budget: 1st release 1,44,71,600 4 Budget: 2nd Release 1,08,53,700 5 Total Budget Released 2,53,25,300 6 Budget yet to be released 1,08,53,700 7 Expenditure 2,12,81,342

Note: Till date institutional charges have not been claimed S.No. Date Recommendations Action Taken

1 07-09-17 10% representative Comment were taken in to distribution network for consideration while doing the conveyance efficiency and experiment 10% representative command areas for on- farm application efficiency to be studied for one agriculture year have not been identified in the report. 2 07-09-17 No specific mention of the Field crews were appointed as field crew required for per the requirement to monitor round the year on-field and to collect the readings. primary data collection. 3 07-09-17 Need to firm up the Considered representative study reaches/ areas. S.No. Date Recommendations Action Taken 4 07-09-17 Quantum of the primary of one We will incorporate in the agriculture year and secondary report data of 10 years with sources has not been crystallized in IPO-1

5 07-09-17 No reference to the process Experiments were carried stipulated in the CWC guideline out as per the IS codes including the IS 9452-Pt-I & Pt-II only. We will mention in for proper estimation of the the report. reservoir, conveyance, on-farm, drainage & overall efficiency. 6 07-09-17 A summary at the end of the we will incorporate report on the state of water use efficiency of the project based on various studies need to be included in the report. S.No. Date Recommendations Action Taken 7 27-09-17 & Where the study work i.e. Comments were 24-11-17 observations are to be taken - considered Locations

8 27-09-17 How many observations are to As per the guide lines be taken in one agriculture year - Quantification (tentative) 9 27-09-17 Who will take these observations Field crews were – detailing of the Team - the field appointed as per the crew in particular requirement to monitor and to collect the readings. S.No. Date Recommendations Action Taken 10 27-09-17 Primary data are yet to be Necessary action will quantified in IPO 1. be taken

11 27-09-17 Methodology about reservoir, conveyance, on-farm, drainage efficiencies assessment is yet to be briefed.

12 27-09-17 These reports also do not mention Consider the comments of the 10% outlets of the projects to and action will be taken be studied. S.No. Date Recommendations Action Taken

13 24-11-17 How many observations are to be taken in one Consider all the comments and do agriculture year - Quantification (tentative): the necessary changes while doing the experiment. Primary data are yet to be quantified in IPO. Based on the available information, quantify the total tentative month-wise discharge observations. Figures to be taken at the marked locations above in the canal system.

Secondly, “The RBC flumes are proposed for use of water measurement in the field channels. Three flumes are proposed to be installed permanently at the inlet of the selected off-takes to measure the daily discharges. For measurement of discharges from other Off Takes and turnouts two portable RBC flumes will be used.” requires figuring out tentative number of devises to be installed in the representative command of 5459.15 ha. In this regard, identified outlet-wise total field channel lengths, turnouts, month-wise number of discharges to be observed through such installed measuring devises may be estimated.