A 4-Year Multi-Centre Observational Study of 302 Cases

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A 4-Year Multi-Centre Observational Study of 302 Cases Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 36 (2017) 27–30 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Clinical Neuroscience journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jocn Original paper Use of subdural drain for chronic subdural haematoma? A 4-year multi-centre observational study of 302 cases David Yuen Chung Chan a, Peter Yat Ming Woo b, Calvin Hoi Kwan Mak c, Alberto Chi Ho Chu b, Charles Churk Hang Li d, Natalie Man Wai Ko b, Stephanie Chi Ping Ng a, Tin Fung David Sun a, ⇑ Wai Sang Poon a, a Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong b Department of Neurosurgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong c Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong d Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, North District Hospital, Hong Kong article info abstract Article history: Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition and is more prevalent in the Received 18 August 2016 ageing population. Studies have suggested that placement of subdural drains after burr-hole drainage Accepted 29 October 2016 was associated with lower recurrence rates. However, a considerable proportion of surgeons remained unconvinced of the effectiveness of drain placement and concerns exist with the potential complications this additional manoeuvre entails such as infection or bleeding. The aim of the present study is to eval- Keywords: uate the impact of subdural drain on CSDH recurrence and its safety. This is a multicentre observational Burr hole study. Data of consecutive patients with burr-hole drainage performed for CSDH in three hospitals in Chronic subdural haematoma Hong Kong during a four-year period from January 2008 to December 2011 were prospectively collected Elderly trauma Head injury and retrospectively analysed. The primary outcome was symptomatic recurrence requiring re-operation. Recurrence Secondary outcomes included the modified Rankin scales (mRS), morbidity and mortality at six months. Subdural drain A total of 302 patients were identified. The recurrence rate was 8.72% (13/149) with drain placement ver- sus 16.3% (25/153) with no drain (Odds Ratio = 0.489, 95%CI 0.240–0.998; p = 0.0463). Local wound infec- tion, subdural empyema, acute subdural haematoma and other complications had no significant difference. Six-month mRS, 30-day mortality and six-month mortality were comparable in both groups. In conclusion, the use of subdural drain significantly reduced recurrence with no significant increase in complications. Ó 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction per 100,000 persons and for those aged 65 years or older, it is 58.1 per 100,000 persons [1]. Burr-hole drainage is an effective sur- Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgi- gical procedure but recurrence can be up to 8–22% [2]. Previous cal condition and is more prevalent in the ageing population. The prospective studies as early as in 1989 have shown that placement estimated incidence of CSDH in the general population is 13.5 of subdural drains after burr-hole drainage was associated with lower recurrence [3,4]. However a considerable proportion of neu- rosurgeons within our locality remain unconvinced of the effec- tiveness of drain placement and concerns exist regarding the ⇑ Corresponding author at: Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, The potential complications this additional manoeuvre entails such as Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F Lui Che Woo Clinical Sciences Building, Prince infection or bleeding. A survey on the practice of British neurosur- of Wales Hospital, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong. Fax: +852 2637 7974. geons showed that only 11% routinely placed subdural drains and E-mail addresses: [email protected] (D.Y.C. Chan), peterymwoo@ 58% used them in fewer than or equal to one-quarter of their cases gmail.com (P.Y.M. Woo), [email protected] (C.H.K. Mak), albertochu@ [5]. Meta-analyses have shown that only two out of six studies hotmail.com (A.C.H. Chu), [email protected] (C.C.H. Li), [email protected] favoured subdural drain placement [6]. The aim of the present (N.M.W. Ko), [email protected] (S.C.P. Ng), [email protected]. edu.hk (T.F.D. Sun), [email protected] (W.S. Poon), wpoon@surgery. study is to evaluate the impact of subdural drain on CSDH cuhk.edu.hk (W.S. Poon). recurrence. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.10.039 0967-5868/Ó 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 28 D.Y.C. Chan et al. / Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 36 (2017) 27–30 2. Material and methods statistical analyses were done with the SPSS software version 22.0. This study and the research protocol had received ethic The study design was a multi-centre retrospective observa- approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Joint Chinese tional study. During a four-year period from 1st January 2008 to University of Hong Kong and the New Territories East Cluster Clin- 31st December 2011, data of consecutive CSDH patients with ical Research Ethics Committee and the Kowloon West Cluster burr-hole drainage performed at three hospitals in Hong Kong Research Ethics Committee. were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. All patients were followed up for at least six months with clinical Results assessment and interval computed tomography (CT) brain scans according to departmental guidelines. Inclusion criteria for acqui- A total of 302 patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion cri- sition of data for analysis in this study were: (1) age of 18 years teria with CSDH treated with burr-hole drainage during the study or older, (2) presence of symptomatic chronic subdural haema- period were identified for analysis. 149 had subdural drains placed toma by imaging (either by CT or magnetic resonance imaging after burr-hole evacuation of the CSDH (SD group) while 153 had (MRI)), and (3) treatment of unilateral CSDH by two-burr-hole no subdural drains inserted (no-drain group). Baseline data includ- drainage. Exclusion criteria for data analysis included (1) previous ing age, gender, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), smoking history of burr-hole drainage, (2) presence of a cerebrospinal fluid and drinking history were comparable between the two groups diversion device such as a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, (3) bilateral (Table 1). The proportion of patients prescribed with antiplatelet CSDH, (4) alternative surgical drainage techniques other than the and anticoagulant medications were also similar. The SD group two-burr-hole approach e.g. one burr hole or mini-craniotomy, or had more patients with hypertension, but the distribution of (5) use of glucocorticoid medication. Burr-hole drainage was stan- patients with other co-morbidities was not statistically different. dardized in all three hospitals as an operation involving two burr The rate of symptomatic recurrence was 8.7% (13/149) in patients holes with a size at least 14 mm (or greater) in diameter (size of with subdural drains versus 16.3% (25/153) with no drain placed the cranial perforators). The subdural drain (SD) used was a silastic (OR = 0.489, 95%CI 0.240–0.998; p = 0.046) (Table 2). Superficial catheter with an inner diameter of 2 mm and an outer diameter of wound infection rates were 2.6% (4/149) in the SD group versus 3 mm with one to three side holes. The available length of the tub- 1.3% (2/153) in the no-drain group (p = 0.656). Subdural empyema ing was 350 mm and was inserted via the frontal burr hole and was 0.67% (1/149) in the SD group versus 1.3% (2/153) in the no- tunnelled out with an anchoring suture. The silastic catheter was drain group (OR = 0.51, 95%CI 0.046–5.69; p = 0.584). All three connected to a Luer-Lok Connector and three-way connector and patients had reoperation for drainage. The length of stay at the connected to a Drainage Bag. The patient would be instructed to acute hospital was 18 days for the patient with subdural drain lie flat postoperatively and the subdural drainage bag was placed while for the two patients in the no-drain group was 13 days and at bed level for no less than 24 h and no more than 48 h. Due to 34 days respectively. For these three patients complicated with the observational nature of the study, the study protocol did not subdural empyema, there was no mortality at 30 days or six impose any interventions. The decision on whether to insert a sub- months. The mRS at six months was 4 for the SD group while 3 dural drain after burr-hole drainage was based on the operating and 4 respectively for the no-drain group. Two patients, 1.3% surgeon’s judgment. After the operation, computed tomography (2/149), with subdural drain complicated with acute subdural hae- (CT) brain scan was performed at least once before discharge. Fol- matoma (ASDH) and none in the no-drain group. (OR = 5.13, 95%CI low up CT scan was performed at one to four weeks interval till 0.244–107.8; p = 0.292). Both patients with ASDH underwent re- CSDH resolved. Burr-hole drainage would be performed if there operation for clot evacuation. One passed away on postoperative were radiological recurrence and presence of corresponding symp- Day 13 and the other had prolonged hospital stay of 87 days with toms or neurological deficit. The primary outcome was symp- an unfavourable functional outcome (with mRS of 4) at six months. tomatic recurrence rate. Symptomatic recurrence was defined as The average duration of hospital stay was 17 days (4–59 days) for radiological evidence of recurrence with clinical symptoms requir- the SD group versus 11 days (2–50 days) for the no-drain group.
Recommended publications
  • Autumn Issue, November 2003
    Newsletter Autumn Issue, November 2003 Official Publication of Hong Kong College of Radiologists President’s Jottings Dr. Lilian Leong IN THIS ISSUE President’s Some of us had been engaging during the last few weeks and weekends in activities Jottings…………....1 relating to radiology or our College’s events. We had our Fellowship Part II examination, AGM………………3 our Annual Scientific meetings, the Ho Hung Chiu Lecture delivered by Prof. TSUI Lap Chee and our trip to Guangzhou, to participate in the 11th Annual Scientific Congress of ASM………….……3 Chinese Radiological Society (CCR). For our ASM, we had the highest number of Joint Admission registrants this year, reaching almost 500. Some overseas participants got the information Ceremony and H.C. Ho Lecture…….…5 from our website. They gave us the feedback that we should promote our ASM energetically as there could be a lot of overseas Chinese and non-Chinese professionals Exam Result…......7 interested to take a trip to Hong Kong and to attend some professional meetings. We also FRCR Exam had enthusiastic submissions of proffered papers and posters, more than last year. For our Schedule………......8 delegation to CCR, we had supported almost 20 delegates. It was the “largest” delegation Part 2 Fellowship so far, and we had put up scientific posters for the occasion. Course …………....8 CME ……………....9 11th CCR…………10 I had attended the CCR a number of times and I appreciate the rapid evolution of this PET……………....12 annual function of Chinese Radiological Society. This year, the participants reached almost 2000. There were seven parallel sessions, large number of electronic CME CIRSE ……….....13 demonstration and enthusiastic participation in lectures delivered in English.
    [Show full text]
  • New Territories East Cluster Report 2012/13
    1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Hospital Authority Vision, Mission and Values ........................................................................ 5 Message from CCE .................................................................................................................... 6 Messages from HCEs & DHCE ............................................................................................... 8 I. Overview of Cluster Performance ................................................................................ 10 II. Cluster Governance & Organization ........................................................................... 12 III. Key Achievements of Targets 2012/13 A. Allay Staff Shortage and High Turnover .................................................................... 16 B. Better Manage Growing Service Demand ................................................................... 16 C. Ensure Service Quality and Safety ............................................................................ 18 D. Enhance Partnership with Patients and Community .................................................. 20 E. Ensure Adequate Resources for Meeting Service Needs ............................................ 20 IV. Key Achievements of Cluster Functions 2012/13 A. Administrative Services ............................................................................................. 22 B. Communications ....................................................................................................... 25 C. Finance ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North District Hospital Announces a Nurse Tested Preliminarily Positive to COVID-19
    North District Hospital announces a nurse tested preliminarily positive to COVID-19 The following is issued on behalf of the Hospital Authority: The spokesperson for the North District Hospital made the following announcement today (January 20) regarding a nurse tested preliminarily positive to COVID-19: A nurse in the medical department started experiencing mild malaise on January 18. She attended a community testing centre for COVID-19 viral test yesterday (January 19) and was notified today that she has tested preliminary positive. She is now being treated under isolation at the Prince of Wales Hospital in stable condition. The nurse had worked in the isolation ward recently. Her daily clinical duties included taking care of COVID-19 patients and she had been wearing appropriate personal protective equipment during work. Her last date of duty was January 14. The hospital infection control team is working with the Centre for Health Protection (CHP) on contact tracing. Four nurses in the medical department who have had social gathering with the confirmed nurse in recent days are classified as close contact and quarantine will be arranged. They have all undergone COVID-19 tests and the results are pending. As the nurse has been wearing appropriate personal protective equipment during work, no patient is classified as close contact. As a precautionary measure, viral tests and medical surveillance are being arranged for relevant staff in the isolation ward and the department of medicine. Thorough cleansing and disinfection of the areas where the nurse has worked and rested has been arranged. The hospital will continue to closely monitor the health condition of the concerned staff members and communicate with the CHP on the latest situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival Analysis of Patients with Breast Cancer
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 37 : 5813-5820 (2017) doi:10.21873/anticanres.12024 Survival Analysis of Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing a Modified Radical Mastectomy With or Without a Thoracic Paravertebral Block: a 5-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial MANOJ KUMAR KARMAKAR 1, WINNIE SAMY 1, ANNA LEE 1, JIA WEI LI 1, WING CHEONG CHAN 2, PHOON PING CHEN 3 and BAN C.H. TSUI 4 1Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, P.R. China; 2Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Sheung Shui, New Territories, Hong Kong, P.R. China; 3Departments of Anesthesiology and Operating Services, North District Hospital, Sheung Shui, New Territories, Hong Kong, P.R. China; 4Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, U.S.A. Abstract. Aim: This 5-year prospective follow-up of women nor from that with GA plus c-TPVB (HR=0.79, 95% CI=0.21- randomized to general anesthesia (GA) with or without a 2.96) (p=0.88). Compared to the GA-only group, the risk of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) examined the risk of mortality was similarly not different from that of the two other local recurrence, metastasis and mortality after breast cancer groups (HR=2.57, 95% CI=0.66-9.92; and HR=0.66, 95% surgery. Patients and Methods: A total of 180 patients CI=0.11-3.97, respectively, p=0.15). Conclusion: Although undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomized to the original study was underpowered to properly address one of three study groups: standardized GA only; GA with a long-term outcomes, the results of this analysis suggest that single-injection TPVB (s-TPVB) and placebo paravertebral TPVB, administered whether as a single-injection or infusion after surgery for 72-h; and GA plus with continuous continuous infusion during the perioperative period, had little TPVB (c-TPVB) for 72-h postoperatively.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Brief About the Hospital Authority
    Mission Statement 4. In keeping with its role, the Mission of the Hospital Authority is: · to meet the different needs of patients for public hospital services, and to improve the hospital environment for the benefit of patients; · to serve the public with care, dedication and efficiency, and to encourage community participation in the system, resulting in better care and more direct accountability to the public; · to provide rewarding, fair and challenging employment to all its staff, in an environment conducive to attracting, motivating and retaining well-qualified staff; · to advise the Government of the needs of the community for public hospital services and of the resources required to meet these needs, in order to provide adequate, efficient, effective and value for money public hospital services of the highest standards recognised internationally within the resources obtainable; and · to collaborate with other agencies and bodies in the healthcare and related fields both locally and overseas to provide the greatest benefit to the local community. Corporate Vision and Strategies 5. To realise its mission, the Hospital Authority has developed the following Corporate Vision: “The Hospital Authority will collaborate with other healthcare providers and carers in the community to create a seamless healthcare environment which will maximise healthcare benefits and meet community expectations.” 6. The Authority achieves this corporate vision by formulating a set of strategic directions every year through an extensive annual planning process, taking into account the funding position, societal expectations, Government’s healthcare policy, and the challenges in the internal and external environment. The 2 corporate vision and mission are turned into operational targets to meet the community needs for healthcare services.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Hospitals That Keep Copies of the Application Form for Reimbursement / Direct Payment of Medical Expenses
    List of Hospitals that Keep Copies of the Application Form for Reimbursement / Direct Payment of Medical Expenses Responsible Office / Location / Cluster Hospital Telephone Office Hours Hong Kong Pamela Youde Enquiry Counter / 2595 6205 East Cluster Nethersole G/F., Main Block, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital Eastern Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Ruttonjee Medical Records Office / 2291 1035 Hospital LG1, Hospital Main Building, Ruttonjee Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon St. John Hospital Personnel Office / 2981 9442 2/F., OPD Block, St. John Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Hong Kong Queen Mary Health Information & Records Office / 2855 4175 West Cluster Hospital 2/F., Block S, Queen Mary Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Grantham Patient Relations Officer / 2518 2182 Hospital 1/F., Kwok Tak Seng Heart Centre, Grantham Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. - 2 - Responsible Office / Location / Cluster Hospital Telephone Office Hours Kowloon Kwong Wah Medical Report Office / 3517 5216 West Cluster Hospital 1/F., Central Stack, Kwong Wah Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Anesthesia University of Toronto Annual Report 2005
    DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO ANNUAL REPORT 2005 – 2006 http://www.anesthesia.utoronto.ca 150 College Street Room 121 Fitzgerald Building Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E2 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO – DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Chair ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Anesthesia Fellows (2005-2006) ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Awards and Achievements ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Department Council ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Undergraduate Education Committee ........................................................................................................................... 8 Postgraduate Education Committee ............................................................................................................................... 12 Anesthesia Residents (2005-2006) .................................................................................................................................. 14 U of T Fellowship Research Seminar Series .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Medical Social Services Units Under Social Welfare Department
    List of Medical Social Services Units Under Social Welfare Department Hong Kong Name of Hospital/Clinic Tel. No. Email Address 1. Queen Mary Hospital 2255 3762 [email protected] 2255 3764 2. Wong Chuk Hang Hospital 2873 7201 [email protected] 3. Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern 2595 6262 [email protected] Hospital 4. Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern 2595 6773 [email protected] Hospital (Psychiatric Department) Kowloon Name of Hospital/Clinic Tel. No. Email Address 5. Tseung Kwan O Hospital 2208 0335 [email protected] 2208 0327 6. United Christian Hospital 3949 5178 [email protected] (Psychiatry) 7. Queen Elizabeth Hospital 3506 7021 [email protected] 3506 7027 3506 5499 3506 4021 8. Hong Kong Eye Hospital 2762 3069 [email protected] 9. Kowloon Hospital Rehabilitation 3129 7857 [email protected] Building 10. Kowloon Hospital 3129 6193 [email protected] 11. Kowloon Hospital 2768 8534 [email protected] (Psychiatric Department) 1 The New Territories Name of Hospital/Clinic Tel. No. Email Address 12. Prince of Wales Hospital 3505 2400 [email protected] 13. Shatin Hospital 3919 7521 [email protected] 14. Tai Po Hospital 2607 6304 [email protected] Sub-office Tai Po Hospital (Child and Adolescent 2689 2486 [email protected] Mental Health Centre) 15. North District Hospital 2683 7750 [email protected] 16. Tin Shui Wai Hospital 3513 5391 [email protected] 17. Castle Peak Hospital 2456 7401 [email protected] 18. Siu Lam Hospital 2456 7186 [email protected] 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Hospital Authority's Planned Projects for 2021-2022
    LC Paper No. CB(4)503/20-21(02) Head 708 Subhead 8083MM One-Off Grant to the Hospital Authority for Minor Works Projects 2021-22 Planned Projects Prepared by the Hospital Authority February 2021 Head 708 : Subhead 8083MM One-off Grant to the Hospital Authority for Minor Works Projects for the 2019-20 Financial Year Part A - Previously approved items and other items to commence in 2020-21 with expected expenditure in 2020-21 and/or 2021-22 Actual Approved Cumulative Revised Estimated cash flow in subsequent years Expenditure Estimate Priority / Project Expenditure Estimate Project Title (1.4.2020 to 2021-22 Post Item No. Estimate to 31.3.2020 2020-21 31.10.2020) 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 ($'000) (I) Previously approved items (up to 31.10.2020) with expected expenditure in 2020-21 and/or 2021-22 EMR15-604 Modernisation of lifts in Day Treatment Block and Special Block in Prince of Wales Hospital 16,794 16,540 254 254 - - - - - EMR16-104 Replacement of the local central control and monitoring system for Wong Chuk Hang Hospital 1,280 1,150 39 101 - 30 - - - EMR16-401 Replacement of fire alarm and detection system at Hospital Main Block in Tseung Kwan O 6,500 6,500 (1,371) (1,371) - - - - - Hospital EMR16-504 Replacement of 1 no. main switch board for Block A in Yan Chai Hospital 2,345 2,202 142 142 - - - - - EMR16-505 Replacement of building management system at Multi Services Complex in Yan Chai Hospital 3,500 3,148 55 55 297 - - - - EMR16-506 Replacement of the air handling unit for Department of Central Supporting Services at 1/F, 502 526 (24) (24) - - - - - Block B in Yan Chai Hospital EMR17-102 Replacement of emergency generators for Hospital Block at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaesthesia Related Mortality 2003-2005
    Anaesthesia Related Mortality 2003-2005 Quality Subcommittee Co-ordinating Committee in Anaesthesiology Hospital Authority 1 8 May 2007 Anaesthesia Related Mortality 2003-2005 Introduction: • A territory wide audit in anaesthesia has not been conducted • Quality Assurance (QA) Subcommittee of the Co-ordinating Committee in Anaesthesiology of the Hospital Authority, conducted a HA wide audit on anaesthesia related mortality • Incidence of anaesthesia related mortality between the years 2003 and 2005 • Analysed the factors leading to death associated with anesthesia 2 8 May 2007 Anaesthesia Related Mortality 2003-2005 Methodology (1): • The primary endpoint of this audit, death within 30 days after surgery, was detected by comparing this list of patients with the Hong Kong Government Births and Death Registry • Since we used the criterion of death within 30 days after surgery, the search was extended to include deaths occurred before 30th January 2006 • The HA Health Informatics Section, together with the assistance of in-house statisticians also facilitated the search process 3 8 May 2007 Anaesthesia Related Mortality 2003-2005 Methodology (2): • The list of patients who received anaesthesia in one of the 20 HA hospitals between 1st January, 2003 and 31st December, 2005, was initially identified by the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) • The CDARS is a powerful tool developed by HA in 2002, it can be considered as a mega data warehouse with inputs from a number of source systems 4 8 May 2007 Anaesthesia Related Mortality
    [Show full text]
  • (16 January 2018) List of Hospitals/Clinics Under the Hospital Authority
    Social Welfare Department List of Medical Social Services Units (16 January 2018) List of Hospitals/Clinics under the Hospital Authority Hong Kong Name of Hospital/Clinic Address Tel. No. Fax. No. Opening Hours 1. Queen Mary Hospital J122, 1/F, Block J, 2255 3762 2872 8565 Mon – Fri: 8:45 am – 5:15 pm Queen Mary Hospital, 2255 3764 Lunch break: 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Sat: 9:00 am – 12:00 noon 2. Wong Chuk Hang Hospital G/F, Wong Chuk Hang Hospital, 2873 7201 2554 7318 Mon – Fri: 8:45 am – 5:15 pm 2 Wong Chuk Hang Path, Lunch break: 12:30 pm to 1:30 pm Wong Chuk Hang, Hong Kong Sat: 9:00 am – 12:00 noon 3. Western Psychiatric Centre G/F, South Wing, David Trench 2517 8141 2559 9464 Mon – Fri: 8:30 am – 6:00 pm Rehabilitation Centre, Lunch break: 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm 1F High Street, Hong Kong 4. Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Room 081, 1/F, Main Block, Pamela 2595 6262 2558 6023 Mon – Fri:8:45 am – 5:15 pm Hospital Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Lunch break: 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm 3 Lok Man Road, Chai Wan, Sat: 9:00 am – 1:00 pm Hong Kong 5. Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern 7/F, East Block, Pamela Youde 2595 6773 2557 4231 Mon – Fri: 8:45 am – 5:15 pm Hospital (Psychiatric Department) Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Lunch break: 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm 3 Lok Man Road, Sat: 9:00 am – 1:00 pm Chai Wan, Hong Kong Kowloon Name of Hospital/Clinic Address Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimbursement Forms in Designated Site
    List of Hospitals that Keep Copies of Application FORM A and Application FORM B Responsible Office / Location / Cluster Hospital Telephone Office Hours Hong Kong Pamela Youde Enquiry Counter / 2595 6205 East Cluster Nethersole G/F., Main Block, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital Eastern Hospital / Monday to Friday 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Ruttonjee & Tang Medical Records Office / 2291 1035 Shiu Kin LG1, Hospital Main Building, Ruttonjee Hospitals Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. St. John Hospital Medical Records Office / Human Resources 2986 2246 Department/ 2/F., Out-Patients Block, St. John Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Hong Kong Queen Mary Health Information & Records Office / 2255 4175 West Cluster Hospital 2/F., Block S, Queen Mary Hospital / (Monday to Monday to Friday Friday) 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday 2255 3660 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. (Saturday) Grantham Health Information & Records Office / 2518 2201 Hospital G/F., Main Block, Grantham Hospital / Monday to Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. - 2 - Responsible Office / Location / Cluster Hospital Telephone Office Hours Kowloon Kwong Wah Medical Report Office / 3517 5216 West Cluster Hospital 12/F., Central Stack, Kwong Wah Hospital / Monday to Friday 8:45 a.m.
    [Show full text]