Collins English Grammar and Composition Topic: Verbs General

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Collins English Grammar and Composition Topic: Verbs General Class 8 Subject: English Title of the book: Collins English Grammar and Composition Topic: Verbs General Instructions: 1. Write answers in the book. Introduction Verbs denote actions performed in a sentence. Kinds of Verbs 1. Transitive Verbs Transitive verbs require an object to complete their meaning. A transitive verb needs an object after it to complete the sentence. The object after a transitive verb can be a noun or a pronoun. I bought a car. 2. Intransitive Vebs Intransitive verbs cannot have a direct object after them. The subject is doing the action of the verb and nothing receives the action. An intransitive verb does not pass the action to an object. He arrived. Here we cannot have an object after the intransitive verb arrive. You cannot “arrive something” (incorrect). An intransitive verb expresses an action that is complete in itself and it doesn’t need an object to receive the action. The baby smiled. Direct and Indirect Objects A transitive verb can take more than one object. Donovan gave his sister a laptop. In this sentence, there is an indirect object, "his sister," and a direct object, "a laptop." However, there is another way to say this same idea using a prepositional phrase. Donovan gave a laptop to his sister. In English, an indirect object may come between a transitive verb and the direct object, like the first example sentence about Donovan, or the indirect object could be in the form of a prepositional phrase, like the second example sentence about Donovan. An indirect object is only needed if the action is being done to or for somebody; when using a transitive verb, you need to include a direct object, but you may not need to include an indirect object. Finding the Object You can figure out the direct object by using this question format: “The subject did what?” or “The subject [verb] what?” The committee members will raise what? money You can find the indirect object by asking the question “To whom?” or “For whom?” Donovan gave a laptop to whom? his sister Reflexive Verbs When the direct object of a transitive verb is the same as the subject of the verb, the verb is called a reflexive verb. e.g. I washed myself. Answers to the Exercises given in the Book of Unit 6: Verbs Pg 40 A 1. The hungry baby has been crying since morning. (intransitive) 2. The tailor embroidered the dress with ornamental designs. (transitive, dress-direct object) 3. The puppies slept in the cot next to their mother. (intransitive) 4. My mother proudly displayed my sister’s trophy in the living room. (transitive, trophy- direct object) 5. We offered fruits to the ailing woman.(transitive, fruits-direct object, woman- indirect object) 6. The carpenter built a study table for me. (transitive, table-direct object, me- indirect object) 7. Zeba bought clothes for the whole family at the store. (transitive, clothes- direct object, family- indirect object) 8. We could not understand the lesson properly. (transitive, lesson- direct object) 9. Anita won the inter-school quiz contest. (transitive, quiz contest- direct object) 10. The din of the traffic hurts my ears. (transitive, ears- direct object) Pg 41 B. 1. Cathy is painting a beautiful landscape using water colours. 2. My grandfather is cooking a delicious meal for dinner tonight. 3. We held on to our seats tightly as the driver drove dangerously over the hilly terrain. 4. My friends and I are travelling to Germany next month on a student- exchange programme. 5. Amba brewed some coffee for us in her mother’s new coffeemaker. 6. We enjoyed exploring the mangroves forests in the Sunderbans. 7. Shivangi is knitting a multi-coloured scarf for her baby sister now. 8. I had been studying at night when I heard a strange noise outside. 9. My brother baked a cake for my mother to surprise her on her birthday. 10. The burglar attempted fleeing as soon as the dog started growling. C. 1. You cannot afford to waste time now. 2. He agreed to go in my place. 3. Being health conscious, Rakhi prefers to eat home-cooked food. 4. The doctors refused to comment on the condition of the accident victim. 5. I love to go for a walk in the morning. 6. Shalini likes to watch detective films. 7. Raima always refuses to eat green vegetables. 8. It is useless trying to make him see our point of view. 9. My friend helped me to understand the new chemistry lesson. 10. I offered to look after my nieces while my sister wad away. 11. We learnt to design interactive games for toddlers in the workshop. 12. We learnt to make pots and vases in the art and craft classes. Pg 42 D. 2. of feeling 3. from going 4. at playing 5. of leaving 6. of robbing 7. around caring 8. after stealing E. 2. helped ourselves 3. imagined myself 4. taught himself 5. busied himself 6. believed herself 7. fed ourselves 8. introduced ourselves 9. prepared herself 10. behaving themselves Class 8 Subject: English Title of the book: Collins English Grammar and Composition Topic: Non-Finite Verbs General Instructions: 1. Write answers in the book. Introduction Finite verbs They change their form according to the number and person of the subject and the tense of the verb. e.g. The man runs to the store to get a gallon of milk. Non- Finite Verbs They are not marked for tense and do not show agreement with a subject. e.g. He wanted to find a solution. Non-finite verbs are of three types: a) Infinitives b) Participles c) Gerunds Infinitives An infinitive is a non-finite verb in its base form and is usally preceded by the word to. It act as a noun, adjective or adverb. e.g. I love to swim. He wants to travel to UK. The Bare Infinitive The infinitive can sometimes occur without the word to. The form without to is called the bare infinitive (the form with to is called the to-infinitive). In the following sentences both sit and to sit would each be considered an infinitive: I want to sit on the other chair. I can sit here all day. Infinitives have a variety of uses in English. Certain contexts call for the to-infinitive form, and certain contexts call for the bare infinitive; they are not normally interchangeable, except in occasional instances like after the verb help, where either can be used. Some verbs require the bare infinitive instead of the to-infinitive: The helping verb do o Does she dance? Gerunds Gerunds all end in -ing: skiing, reading, dancing, singing, etc. Gerunds act like nouns and can serve as subjects or objects of sentences. They can be created using active or helping verbs: I like swimming. Participle A participle is a form of a verb that is used in a sentence to modify a noun, noun phrase, verb, or verb phrase, and then plays a role similar to an adjective or adverb. It is one of the types of non-finite verb forms. The two types of participle in English are traditionally called the present participle (forms such as writing, singing and raising) and the past participle (forms such as written, sung and raised). The Present Participle Even though they look exactly the same, gerunds and present participles do different things. The gerund acts as a noun: e.g., “I like sleeping“; “Sleeping is not allowed.” Present participles, on the other hand, act similarly to an adjective or adverb: e.g., “The sleeping girl over there is my sister”; “Breathing heavily, she finished the race in first place.” The present participle, or participial phrases (clauses) formed from it, are used as follows: as an adjective phrase modifying a noun phrase: The man sitting over there is my uncle. adverbially, the subject being understood to be the same as that of the main clause: Looking at the plans, I gradually came to see where the problem lay. He shot the man, killing him. more generally as a clause or sentence modifier: Broadly speaking, the project was successful. The present participle can also be used with the helping verb to be to form a type of present tense: Marta was sleeping. This is something we learned a little bit about in helping verbs and tense. The Past Participle Past participles often look very similar to the simple past tense of a verb: finished, danced, etc. However, some verbs have different forms. Reference lists will be your best help in finding the correct past participle. Here’s a short list of some of the most common irregular past participles you’ll use: Verb Simple Past Past Participle to be was/were been to become became become to do did done Verb Simple Past Past Participle to go went gone to know knew know to see saw seen to speak spoke spoken to take took taken to write wrote written Past participles are used in a couple of different ways: as an adjective phrase: The chicken eaten by the children was contaminated. adverbially: Seen from this perspective, the problem presents no easy solution. in a nominative absolute construction, with a subject: The task finished, we returned home. The past participle can also be used with the helping verb to have to form a type of past tense The chicken has eaten. It is also used to form the passive voice: Tianna was voted as most likely to succeed. When the passive voice is used following a relative pronoun (like that or which) we sometimes leave out parts of the phrase: He had three things that were taken away from him He had three things taken away from him In the second sentence, we removed the words that were.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter Ii the Types of Phrasal Verbs in Movie Snow White and the Huntsman by Rupert Sanders
    33 CHAPTER II THE TYPES OF PHRASAL VERBS IN MOVIE SNOW WHITE AND THE HUNTSMAN BY RUPERT SANDERS In this chapter, the researcher will analyzed the types of phrasal verbs. It is to complete the first question in this research. The researcher had been categorizing the types of phrasal verbs and form that divided into verb and adverb, also sometimes prepositions. 2.1. Types of Phrasal Verbs in movie Snow White and the Huntsman According to Heaton (1985:103) considers that phrasal verbs are compound verbs that result from combining a verb with an adverb or a preposition, the resulting compound verb being idiomatic. Phrasal verb is one of important part of grammar that almost found in English language. Based on Andrea Rosalia in her book “A Holistic Approach to Phrasal Verb”, Phrasal verbs are considered to be a very important and frequently occurring feature of the English language. First of all, they are so common in every day conversation, and non-native speakers who wish to sound natural when speaking this language need to learn their grammar in order to know how to produce them correctly. Secondly, the habit of inventing phrasal verbs has been the source of great enrichment of the language (Andrea Rosalia, 2012:16). A grammarian such as Eduard, Vlad (1998:93) describes phrasal verbs as "combinations of a lexical verb and adverbial particle". It means that the verb if wants to be a phrasal verb always followed by particle. It can be one particle or two particles in one verb. If the case is like that, it called as multi word verbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ling 130 Notes: Predicate Logic and English Syntax
    Ling 130 Notes: Predicate Logic and English Syntax Sophia A. Malamud February 15, 2011 1 Characteristic functions The characteristic function of a set: (1) Let A be a set. The, charA, the characteristic function of A, is the function F such that, for any x∈ A, F(x)=1, and for any x ∉ A, F(x)=0. Schönfinkelization: (2) U = {a,b,c} (3) The relation "fond of": Rfond-of = {<a,b>, <b,c>, <c,c>} (4) The characteristic function of Rfond-of (takes all combinations of two elements, gives 0/1): <a,a> →0 <a,b> →1 <a,c> →0 <b,a> →0 CharRfond-of = <b,b> →0 <b,c> →1 <c,a> →0 <c,b> →0 <c,c> →1 (5) Turning n-ary functions into multiple embedded 1-ary functions: Schönfinkelization. a → 0 left-to-right schönfinkelization a →b → 1 c → 0 a → 0 b →b → 0 c → 1 a → 0 c →b → 0 c → 1 EXERCISE 1: Given the following Universe, spell out the characteristic function of the set in (6) and schönfinkelize it left-to-right. 1 (6) U = {d, e} (7) R = { <d,d,d>, <d,e,d>, <e,d,d>, <e,e,e>, <e,e,d> } 2 Syntactic composition A formal language is a set of strings - finite sequences of minimal units (words/morphemes, for natural languages) - with meaning. The "machine" that generates those strings and their corresponding meanings is its grammar. A grammar must specify the following three components: • A lexicon which contains every minimal unit with meaning (= every word, for this course) and its grammatical category; • a syntax, that is, a set of rules that tells you how the minimal units combine to form longer units, how this longer units combine to form yet longer units, and so forth until we form full complex sentences; and • a semantics, which determines what semantic operation or function corresponds to each syntactic rule and combines the “atomic” word meanings to build the meaning of the complete sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: a Case Study from Koro
    Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro By Jessica Cleary-Kemp A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair Assistant Professor Peter S. Jenks Professor William F. Hanks Summer 2015 © Copyright by Jessica Cleary-Kemp All Rights Reserved Abstract Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro by Jessica Cleary-Kemp Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair In this dissertation a methodology for identifying and analyzing serial verb constructions (SVCs) is developed, and its application is exemplified through an analysis of SVCs in Koro, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. SVCs involve two main verbs that form a single predicate and share at least one of their arguments. In addition, they have shared values for tense, aspect, and mood, and they denote a single event. The unique syntactic and semantic properties of SVCs present a number of theoretical challenges, and thus they have invited great interest from syntacticians and typologists alike. But characterizing the nature of SVCs and making generalizations about the typology of serializing languages has proven difficult. There is still debate about both the surface properties of SVCs and their underlying syntactic structure. The current work addresses some of these issues by approaching serialization from two angles: the typological and the language-specific. On the typological front, it refines the definition of ‘SVC’ and develops a principled set of cross-linguistically applicable diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbs in Relation to Verb Complementation 11-69
    1168 Complementation of verbs and adjectives Verbs in relation to verb complementation 11-69 They may be either copular (clause pattern SVC), or complex transitive verbs, or monotransitive verbs with a noun phrase object), we can give only (clause pattern SVOC): a sample of common verbs. In any case, it should be borne in mind that the list of verbs conforming to a given pattern is difficult to specífy exactly: there SVC: break even, plead guilty, Iie 101V are many differences between one variety of English and another in respect SVOC: cut N short, work N loose, rub N dry of individual verbs, and many cases of marginal acceptability. Sometimes the idiom contains additional elements, such as an infinitive (play hard to gel) or a preposition (ride roughshod over ...). Note The term 'valency' (or 'valencc') is sometimes used, instead of complementation, ror the way in (The 'N' aboye indicates a direct object in the case oftransitive examples.) which a verb determines the kinds and number of elements that can accompany it in the clause. Valency, however, incIudes the subject 01' the clause, which is excluded (unless extraposed) from (b) VERB-VERB COMBINATIONS complementation. In these idiomatic constructions (ef 3.49-51, 16.52), the second verb is nonfinite, and may be either an infinitive: Verbs in intransitive function 16.19 Where no eomplementation oecurs, the verb is said to have an INTRANSITIVE make do with, make (N) do, let (N) go, let (N) be use. Three types of verb may be mentioned in this category: or a participle, with or without a following preposition: (l) 'PURE' INTRANSITIVE VERas, which do not take an object at aH (or at put paid to, get rid oJ, have done with least do so only very rarely): leave N standing, send N paeking, knock N fiying, get going John has arrived.
    [Show full text]
  • The Production of Finite and Nonfinite Complement Clauses by Children with Specific Language Impairment and Their Typically Developing Peers
    The Production of Finite and Nonfinite Complement Clauses by Children With Specific Language Impairment and Their Typically Developing Peers Amanda J. Owen University of Iowa, Iowa City The purpose of this study was to explore whether 13 children with specific language Laurence B. Leonard impairment (SLI; ages 5;1–8;0 [years;months]) were as proficient as typically developing age- and vocabulary-matched children in the production of finite and Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN nonfinite complement clauses. Preschool children with SLI have marked difficulties with verb-related morphology. However, very little is known about these children’s language abilities beyond the preschool years. In Experiment 1, simple finite and nonfinite complement clauses (e.g., The count decided that Ernie should eat the cookies; Cookie Monster decided to eat the cookies) were elicited from the children through puppet show enactments. In Experiment 2, finite and nonfinite complement clauses that required an additional argument (e.g., Ernie told Elmo that Oscar picked up the box; Ernie told Elmo to pick up the box) were elicited from the children. All 3 groups of children were more accurate in their use of nonfinite complement clauses than finite complement clauses, but the children with SLI were less proficient than both comparison groups. The SLI group was more likely than the typically developing groups to omit finiteness markers, the nonfinite particle to, arguments in finite complement clauses, and the optional complementizer that. Utterance-length restrictions were ruled out as a factor in the observed differences. The authors conclude that current theories of SLI need to be extended or altered to account for these results.
    [Show full text]
  • Ditransitive Constructions Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig (Germany) 23-25 November 2007
    Conference on Ditransitive Constructions Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig (Germany) 23-25 November 2007 Abstracts On “Dimonotransitive” Structures in English Carmen Aguilera Carnerero University of Granada Ditransitive structures have been prototypically defined as those combinations of a ditransitive verb with an indirect object and a direct object. However, although in the prototypical ditransitive construction in English, both objects are present, there is often omission of one of the constituentes, usually the indirect object. The absence of the indirect object has been justified on the basis of the irrelevance of its specification or the possibility of recovering it from the context. The absence of the direct object, on the other hand, is not so common and only occur with a restricted number of verbs (e.g. pay, show or tell).This type of sentences have been called “dimonotransitives” by Nelson, Wallis and Aarts (2002) and the sole presence in the syntactic structure arises some interesting questions we want to clarify in this article, such as: (a) the degree of syntactic and semantic obligatoriness of indirect objects and certain ditransitive verbs (b) the syntactic behaviour of indirect objects in absence of the direct object, in other words, does the Oi take over some of the properties of typical direct objects as Huddleston and Pullum suggest? (c) The semantic and pragmatic interpretations of the missing element. To carry out our analysis, we will adopt a corpus –based approach and especifically we will use the International Corpus of English (ICE) for the most frequent ditransitive verbs (Mukherjee 2005) and the British National Corpus (BNC) for the not so frequent verbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitive Verb
    Transitive verb This article needs additional citations for verification. Learn more A transitive verb is a verb that accepts one or more objects. This contrasts with intransitive verbs, which do not have objects. Transitivity is traditionally thought a global property of a clause, by which activity is transferred from an agent to a patient.[1] Transitive verbs can be classified by the number of objects they require. Verbs that accept only two arguments, a subject and a single direct object, are monotransitive. Verbs that accept two objects, a direct object and an indirect object, are ditransitive,[2] or less commonly bitransitive.[3] An example of a ditransitive verb in English is the verb to give, which may feature a subject, an indirect object, and a direct object: John gave Mary the book. Verbs that take three objects are tritransitive.[4] In English a tritransitive verb features an indirect object, a direct object, and a prepositional phrase – as in I'll trade you this bicycle for your binoculars – or else a clause that behaves like an argument – as in I bet you a pound that he has forgotten.[5] Not all descriptive grammars recognize tritransitive verbs.[6] A clause with a prepositional phrase that expresses a meaning similar to that usually expressed by an object may be called pseudo-transitive. For example, the Indonesian sentences Dia masuk sekolah ("He attended school") and Dia masuk ke sekolah ("He went into the school") have the same verb (masuk "enter"), but the first sentence has a direct object while the second has a prepositional phrase in its place.[7] A clause with a direct object plus a prepositional phrase may be called pseudo-ditransitive, as in the Lakhota sentence Haŋpíkčeka kiŋ lená wé-čage ("I made those moccasins for him").[8] Such constructions are sometimes called complex transitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Preposition Stranding Vs. Pied-Piping—The Role of Cognitive Complexity in Grammatical Variation
    languages Article Preposition Stranding vs. Pied-Piping—The Role of Cognitive Complexity in Grammatical Variation Christine Günther Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Universität Siegen, 57076 Siegen, Germany; [email protected] Abstract: Grammatical variation has often been said to be determined by cognitive complexity. Whenever they have the choice between two variants, speakers will use that form that is associated with less processing effort on the hearer’s side. The majority of studies putting forth this or similar analyses of grammatical variation are based on corpus data. Analyzing preposition stranding vs. pied-piping in English, this paper sets out to put the processing-based hypotheses to the test. It focuses on discontinuous prepositional phrases as opposed to their continuous counterparts in an online and an offline experiment. While pied-piping, the variant with a continuous PP, facilitates reading at the wh-element in restrictive relative clauses, a stranded preposition facilitates reading at the right boundary of the relative clause. Stranding is the preferred option in the same contexts. The heterogenous results underline the need for research on grammatical variation from various perspectives. Keywords: grammatical variation; complexity; preposition stranding; discontinuous constituents Citation: Günther, Christine. 2021. Preposition Stranding vs. Pied- 1. Introduction Piping—The Role of Cognitive Grammatical variation refers to phenomena where speakers have the choice between Complexity in Grammatical Variation. two (or more) semantically equivalent structural options. Even in English, a language with Languages 6: 89. https://doi.org/ rather rigid word order, some constructions allow for variation, such as the position of a 10.3390/languages6020089 particle, the ordering of post-verbal constituents or the position of a preposition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Transitive and Intransitive Verbs in English Language
    NOTION NOTION Volume 01, Number 02, November 2019 p. 62-67 The Relationship between Transitive and Intransitive Verbs in English Language Teddy Fiktorius SMA Bina Mulia Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia [email protected] Article Info ABSTRACT Article History In the current research, the researcher employs descriptive method (library Article Received research) to elaborate on the relationship and differentiation between the 17th August 2019 English language transitive and intransitive verbs. The first parts explore the Article Reviewed theoretical framework of the relationship and differentiation equipped with 9th September 2019 various sentences samples. The next part discusses the implications for English Article Accepted language teachers in coping with some grammatical confusion. Finally, some 11 October 2019 solutions as well as recommendations are proposed. Keywords transitive verbs intransitive verbs grammatical confusion I. INTRODUCTION misleading sentences that lose its exact meaning. Verbs can be so tricky that even the best grammar Students, particularly the speakers of other languages, students might be often confounded by the difference often have difficulty determining which verbs require between transitive and intransitive verbs. The an object, and which do not. When students confuse confusion with the use of the transitive and transitive and intransitive verbs, the sentences they intransitive verbs can be resolved as a grammar point construct both orally and in written may be becomes clear with an understanding of objects. incomplete. When using a dictionary to look up verbs, we may This current paper is written to provide us with have been puzzled by the abbreviations vi (intransitive better insights into the difference of transitive and verb) and vt (transitive verb).
    [Show full text]
  • Constructions and Result: English Phrasal Verbs As Analysed in Construction Grammar
    CONSTRUCTIONS AND RESULT: ENGLISH PHRASAL VERBS AS ANALYSED IN CONSTRUCTION GRAMMAR by ANNA L. OLSON A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Master of Arts in Linguistics, Analytical Stream We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard ............................................................................... Dr. Emma Pavey, PhD; Thesis Supervisor ................................................................................ Dr. Sean Allison, Ph.D.; Second Reader ................................................................................ Dr. David Weber, Ph.D.; External Examiner TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY September 2013 © Anna L. Olson i Abstract This thesis explores the difference between separable and non-separable transitive English phrasal verbs, focusing on finding a reason for the non-separable verbs’ lack of compatibility with the word order alternation which is present with the separable phrasal verbs. The analysis is formed from a synthesis of ideas based on the work of Bolinger (1971) and Gorlach (2004). A simplified version of Cognitive Construction Grammar is used to analyse and categorize the phrasal verb constructions. The results indicate that separable and non-separable transitive English phrasal verbs are similar but different constructions with specific syntactic reasons for the incompatibility of the word order alternation with the non-separable verbs. ii Table of Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Verb Expresses Action Or a State of Being. Verbs Are Classified in 3 Ways
    Verbs A verb expresses action or a state of being. Verbs are classified in 3 ways: As helping or main verbs As action or linking verbs As transitive or intransitive verbs 1. Main Verbs and Helping Verbs A helping verb may be separated from the main verb. A verb phrase consists of one main verb and one or more helping verbs. Examples I am reading Gulliver’s Travels. We should have been listening instead of talking. Did she paint the house? Commonly Used Helping Verbs Forms of BE A modal is an auxiliary am, is, are, was, were, verb that is used to be, being, been express an attitude toward the action or state of being of the Forms of HAVE main verb. have, having, has, had MODALS can, could, may, might, Forms of DO must, ought, shall, do, does, did should, will, would Not and the contraction of n’t are never part of a verb phrase Instead, they are adverbs telling to what extent. We did not hear you. We didn’t hear you. 2. Action Verbs and Linking Verbs An action verb expresses either physical or mental activity. A linking verb connects the subject to a word or word group that identifies or describes the subject. Such a word group is called a subject complement. Commonly Used Linking Verbs Forms of Be be were shall have been should be being shall be will have been would be am will be can be could be is has been may be should have been are have been might be would have been was had been must be could have been Other Linking Verbs appear feel look seem sound taste become grow remain smell stay turn Depending on how these words are used in a sentence, they can be classified as linking or action verbs.
    [Show full text]
  • TAV of English Finite Verb Phrase
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, July 2018, Vol. 8, No. 7, 1126-1130 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2018.07.019 D DAVID PUBLISHING TAV of English Finite Verb Phrase Peter Lung-shan CHUNG University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China It is widely known that a finite verb phrase (fVP) of a clause in English consists of three components: tense, aspect and voice. While the two tenses, present and past, and the two voices, active and passive, are recognized and generally agreed, the number and constituents of aspects may not be so simple and they are open to dispute. This paper proposes that a new aspect, the “modal” aspect, be included in addition to the commonly recognized ones, namely “simple”, “perfect” and “continuous” (also known as “progressive”). With the inclusion of the “modal” aspect, there are four single aspects: “simple”, “modal”, “perfect” and “continuous”. They can be combined to form multiple aspects according to the aforesaid sequence. The “modal” aspect is realized with a modal verb (any ofthe modal verbs will/would, shall/should, can/could, may/might, must, ought to, used to and the two semi-modals, “need” and “dare” in interrogative and negative structures). Whenever a modal verb is used, the verb phrase is in the modal aspect. The modal verb to be used is for the interlocutor to decide and falls beyond this discussion, which focuses on the structure of the fVP of the English language. The two tenses, eight aspects and two voices (active and passive) make up the 32 TAVs (an acronym formed with “Tense”, “Aspect” and “Voice”) of the English fVP.
    [Show full text]