DOCSLIB.ORG

Nhdr2011eng.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nhdr2011eng.Pdf The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) is a global UN development network aimed at positively changing human life through provision to participating countries of access to knowledge, experience and resources. National Human Development Report for the Russian Federation, 2011 Modernization and Human Development Moscow 2011 Chief Authors: Prof. Alexander A. Auzan, Prof. Sergei N. Bobylev, Dr.Sc. (Economics) Dr.Sc. (Economics) Member of the RF Presidential Commission for Professor, Faculty of Economics, Modernization and Technological Development of the Lomonosov Moscow State University, Economy; Head of the Consulting Group Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation National Human Development Report 2011 for the Russian Federation /Edited by Prof. Alexander Auzan and Prof. Sergey Bobylev. M., UNDP in Russia / editing in English by Ben W. Hooson/ Design, prepress and printing by LLC Samolet Design Project. – M., 2011 - 142 pages, tables, figures, boxes. Readers are invited to inspect and read the latest Human Development Report for the Russian Federation. National reports such as this are published on the initiative of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) in many countries of the world. Global Reports are also brought out annually. The reports are prepared by teams of independent experts. The main goal of the 2011 Report is to study Russia’s modernization goals in the context of human development, and to show the necessity of modernizing the economy and social life, and of improving many public institutions in Russia. This approach to aspects of modernization is a logical development of previous Human Development Reports for Russia. The present Report identifies basic modernization components, main parameters of a post-crisis economy, Russia’s social issues, development of social and institutional infrastructure, and analyzes what human development in a ‘new’ economy should be. The Report is intended use by for senior managers, political scientists, scientific researchers, teachers and high school students. The United Nations Development Programme in the Russian Federation expresses its sincere gratitude to the sponsor of the 2011 National Human Development Report for the Russian Federation: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) The authors express their gratitude to the senior personnel and staff of the Faculty of Economics at Lomonosov Moscow State University, particularly: Prof. Vasiliy P. Kolesov, Dean and National Project Director; Vladimir J. Echenique, Deputy Dean; and also to senior personnel of the Department for International Organizations at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation: Vladimir N. Sergeev, Department Director; Victor I. Zagrekov, Deputy Department Director; as well as to the management and staff of the UNDP Russia Team: Elena A. Armand, Head of Office; Natalia V. Voronkova, Project Coordinator; and Elena. E. Ovchinnikova, Project Associate. The authors also thank the Federal State Statistics Service, the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation and other ministries for data provided for the Report; as well as the World Bank, other UN Agencies in Russia and participants of the Public Hearing on the Report draft for their constructive comments. 2 The 2011 National Human Development Report (NHDR) for the Russian Federation has been prepared by a team of Russian experts and consultants. The analysis and policy recommendations in this Report do not necessarily reflect the views of the UN systems and other institutions by which the experts and consultants are employed. Authors: Introduction: Chapter 3. Box. Modernization in the Welfare of Russian Russia’s Demographic Russian Context Households as a Marker of Development: Trends, Prof. Alexander A. Auzan, Modernization Potential Problems, Solutions Dr.Sc. (Economics) Lilia N. Ovcharova, Valeriy Elizarov, Member of the RF Presidential Commission Ph.D. (Economics) Ph. D. (Economics) for Modernization and Technological Research Director, Independent Institute for Head of Centеr for Population Studies, Development of the Economy; Social Policy; Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow Head of the Consulting Group Head of Laboratory of Distributive Relations, State University; Institute of Social and Economic Studies of Professor of Chair of Sociology, Moscow Professor Vitaly L. Tambovtsev, Population, Russian Academy of Sciences University of the Humanities; Dr.Sc. (Economics) Member of Working Group of Presidential Head of Laboratory for Institutional Analysis, Chapter 4. Commission for Implementing Priority Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow The Russian Labour Market: National Projects and Demographic Policy State University; Efficient Employment or Scientific Supervisor of the ‘Social Contract’ Chapter 7. National Project Institute; Limiting Unemployment? Deputy Head of the Expert Council of the Economic Modernization Russian Foundation for Basic Research Prof. Tatyana M. Maleva, and Sustainable Ph.D. (Economics), Doctor of Development Chapter 1. Business Administration (DBA) Prof. Sergei N. Bobylev, The Economy and Director of the Independent Institute for Economic Policy in the Social Policy; Dr.Sc. (Economics) Professor of the National Research University Professor, Faculty of Economics, Crisis Recovery Period Higher School of Economics Lomonosov Moscow State University; Evsey T. Gurvich, Ph. D. Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation (Physics & Mathematics) Chapter 5. Prof. Vladimir M. Zakharov, Head of Economic Expert Group People – Education – Dr. Sc. (Biology) Modernization Corresponding member of the Russian Chapter 2. Academy of Sciences; Prof. Vasiliy P. Kolesov, President of the Center for Russian The Role of Institutions in Dr.Sc. (Economics) Environmental Policy; Modernization Dean of the Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Director of the Institute of Sustainable Moscow State University; Development of the RF Civic Chamber Prof. Alexander A. Auzan, Head of Department for International Dr.Sc. (Economics) Economics Chapter 8. Member of the RF Presidential Commission Associate Prof. Irina G. Modernization and the for Modernization and Technological Development of the Economy; Teleshova, Ph. D. (Economics) Russian Space Head of the Consulting Group Vice-Dean of the Faculty of Economics, Prof. Natalia V. Zubarevich, Lomonosov Moscow State University Professor Vitaly L. Tambovtsev, Dr.Sc. (Geoghraphy) Dr.Sc. (Economics) Chapter 6. Professor, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Head of Laboratory for Institutional Analysis, Modernization and Moscow State University; Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow Head of Regional Programs, Independent State University; Healthy Lifestyle Policy Institute for Social Policy Scientific Supervisor of the ‘Social Contract’ National Project Institute; Associate Prof. Marina G. Deputy Head of the Expert Council of the Kolosnitsyna, Russian Foundation for Basic Research Ph. D. (Economics) Deputy Head of the Department for Public Administration and Public Economics; Head of the Laboratory for Economic Research in the Public Sector, National Research University Higher School of Economics 3 Dear Reader, I am glad to present to you the fif- have joined forces to promote the human de- teenth annual National Human Development velopment concept in Russia. Elaboration of Report for the Russian Federation, prepared national human development reports in the by a team of leading Russian experts. Russian Federation is a principal activity of this joint project. The present Report is de- Since 1995 the United Nations Devel- voted to Modernization and Human Develop- opment Programme has promoted its proj- ment. ects in Russia by supporting the preparation and publication of a series of reports which Modernization of the economy and provide analyses of the social and economic upgrading of many institutions, as well as de- challenges facing our country. Since 2011 velopment of social infrastructure have long the Faculty of Economics of Moscow State been recognized as the necessary condi- University is the National Executive Agency of tions for overall modernization in Russia. It is the Project, having taken over this task from therefore unsurprising that the issue of mod- the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian ernization and human development, dealt Federation. with in the present Report, is a logical de- velopment of the themes of previous Human The Faculty of Economics has for many Development Reports for Russia. The issue is years conducted serious research concern- of interest because it offers a general outline ing human potential, having significantly ex- of the modernization process, Russia’s main panded its activities in this field. The Faculty economic parameters, social and institution- trains masters and post-graduates, teach- al infrastructure, as well as contributing to ers and professors of relevant disciplines, understanding of what human development including training in CIS countries. Together in a ‘new’ economy really means. with the UNDP the Faculty has published two training manuals and has created an Inter- I would like to express my gratitude net portal devoted to human development to UNDP Russia for their support in prepar- issues, which offers an interactive training ing annual Reports, which are important in- course and contains a statistical module struments for inspiring government as well with 100 indicators of social and economic as scientific and political circles to discuss development in Russia’ regions. issues, which are vitally important
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ukraine: What May Lie Ahead by Derek Fraser
    Ukraine: What may Lie Ahead by Derek Fraser Former Ambassador To Ukraine (1998 to 2001) Associate Fellow, Centre for Global Affairs, Adjunct Professor of political Science University of Victoria The reason that so many pundits were so wrong about the possibility of Russia invading Crimea is that that they under-estimated Putin’s determination to recover Russia’s great power status by reasserting control in the former Soviet Union. Even now, there is a certain tendency to regard the Russian seizure of Crimea as a limited issue, whereas Crimea may merely be a prelude to a Russian attempt to take over the Russian speaking regions of Ukraine, if not to control the whole country. In order to know the challenge the West faces, it is important to understand how Putin intends to achieve his goals. Putin has two principal instruments for re-establishing Russia’s zone of influence: the Eurasian Economic Union, to be created next year out of the existing Customs Union, and the Common Security Treaty Organization. In the Russian view, the membership of Ukraine in both organizations is essential to their success. Putin’s has consequently used all means to stop Ukraine from going West: • In April, 2008, Putin reportedly warned President Bush that, should NATO put Ukraine on the path to membership, Russia might respond by instigating the partition of Ukraine. • Last September, Sergey Glazyev, Putin’s economic adviser, stated that, if Ukraine signed the Association Agreement with the EU, Russia could possibly intervene in Ukraine if pro-Russian regions of Ukraine asked for help. • On 17 December last year, Putin got former President Yanukovych to sign an understanding whereby vast sections of the Ukrainian economy fell under joint control, and Ukrainian trade agreements with anyone else would require Russian approval.
    [Show full text]
  • CCW Russia Brief Issue 6 May 2020
    CCW Russia Brief Issue 6 May 2020 Contents Richard Sakwa Russia’s Challenges and Futures Richard Connolly Russian Economic Power Katarzyna Zysk Russian Military Vulnerabilities: Perceptions and Misperceptions Anton Shekhovtsov Moscow’s Far-Right “Useful Idiots” Elisabeth Schimpfössl Russian Elites Copyright and Disclaimer © 2020 Changing Character of War Centre. All rights reserved. Material in this publication is copyrighted under UK law. Individual authors reserve all rights to their work and material should not be reproduced without their prior permission. The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Changing Character of War Centre, Pembroke College, or the University of Oxford. 1 Russia’s Challenges and Futures RICHARD SAKWA University of Kent Russia is neither a rising nor a declining power, but a country used to adversity and resilient in the face of external threats but which repeatedly allows these external challenges – real and imagined – to shape the polity. In the words of the well-known aphorism, ‘Russia is never as strong as it thinks it is, or as weak as we think it is’. One cannot predict the future, but various patterns and challenges can be anticipated. This analysis is written in that spirit. Russia has re-emerged as a major player in international affairs, building on its permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council, coherent statecraft and solid macroeconomic indicators. When Vladimir Putin assumed the presidency in 2000 his declared ambition was to make Russia a ‘normal’ country.1 However, certain aspects of its domestic arrangements and international status are deeply ‘abnormal’, with the standard of normality set by the declarative principles embedded in Chapters 1 and 2 of the 1993 constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2019 Human Rights Report
    RUSSIA 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Russian Federation has a highly centralized, authoritarian political system dominated by President Vladimir Putin. The bicameral Federal Assembly consists of a directly elected lower house (State Duma) and an appointed upper house (Federation Council), both of which lack independence from the executive. The 2016 State Duma elections and the 2018 presidential election were marked by accusations of government interference and manipulation of the electoral process, including the exclusion of meaningful opposition candidates. The Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Security Service (FSB), the Investigative Committee, the Office of the Prosecutor General, and the National Guard are responsible for law enforcement. The FSB is responsible for state security, counterintelligence, and counterterrorism as well as for fighting organized crime and corruption. The national police force, under the Ministry of Internal Affairs, is responsible for combating all crime. The National Guard assists the FSB Border Guard Service in securing borders, administers gun control, combats terrorism and organized crime, protects public order, and guards important state facilities. The National Guard also participates in armed defense of the country’s territory in coordination with Ministry of Defense forces. Except in rare cases, security forces generally reported to civilian authorities. National-level civilian authorities, however, had, at best, limited control over security forces in the Republic of Chechnya, which were accountable only to the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. The country’s occupation and purported annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula continued to affect the human rights situation there significantly and negatively. The Russian government continued to arm, train, lead, and fight alongside Russia-led forces in eastern Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Choice: European Association Agreement Or Eurasian
    Policy Brief NUMBER PB13-22 SEPTEMBER 2013 Ukraine concluded negotiations on a deep and compre- Ukraine’s Choice: European hensive free trade area (DCFTA) with the European Union in late 2011 and the Association Agreement in March 2012. Th e Association Agreement consists of over 1,200 pages, of Association Agreement or which DCFTA forms the bulk with some 1,000 pages. Th e agreement is comprehensive covering all areas of interest. It Eurasian Union? off ers enhanced cooperation in 28 key policy areas, including political cooperation, foreign and security policy, justice, and Anders Åslund freedom. It aims to accelerate the deepening of political and economic relations between Ukraine and the European Union and gradually integrate Ukraine into the EU internal market. Anders Åslund has been senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics since 2006 and is an adjunct professor at Th e Association Agreement thus provides for signifi cant legal, Georgetown University. He has worked as an economic adviser to the regulatory, and political convergence with the European Union, Russian and Ukrainian governments. Åslund is the author of 12 books, for which the European Union off ers considerable assistance. most recently the second edition of How Capitalism Was Built: Th e Yet it stops short of granting EU membership. Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia (2012). He is also the author of How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy (2009), and Russia’s Capitalist Ukraine should improve its macroeconomic Revolution: Why Market Reform Succeeded and Democracy Failed (2007). He has also edited 16 books and published widely.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unnecessary War: the Geopolitical Roots of the Ukraine Crisis.”
    “An unnecessary war: the geopolitical roots of the Ukraine crisis.” Peter Rutland [In Agnieszka Pikulicka and Richard Sakwa (eds.) Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives (Bristol. Uk: E-International Relations, March 2015), 129-140.] To a large degree, the tragic events that unfolded in Ukraine in 2013-14 were driven by developments beyond Ukraine’s borders. Of course, domestic factors also played a crucial role, and Ukrainian political actors at all points across the political spectrum must share in the blame for what transpired. But it was Ukraine’s ambiguous geopolitical position, and the clumsy interventions of competing outside powers pursuing their own self-centered agendas, that pushed Ukraine’s log-jammed domestic politics over the brink into violent civil war. The three main protagonists were Russia, the European Union, and the United States, in roughly descending order of importance. The evolution of Russia’s relations with Ukraine since 1991 Moscow has had difficult, testy relations with Ukraine ever since the two countries split off from the Soviet Union in 1991. The relationship with Kyiv is a sub-set of Russia’s problematic relationship with the outside world at large following the Soviet collapse. In 2014 Ukraine became the touchstone of two decades of Russian frustration and insecurity, with tragic consequences. First Mikhail Gorbachev and then Boris Yeltsin wanted to be treated as an equal partner by the United States. However, the Soviet collapse meant that Russia was stripped of half its population, a third of its territory, and all its bloc of ideological allies and client states.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine and Russia People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives 
    EDITED BY i AGNIESZKA PIKULICKA-WILCZEWSKA & RICHARD SAKWA Ukraine and Russia People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ i Ukraine and Russia People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives EDITED BY AGNIESZKA PIKULICKA-WILCZEWSKA & RICHARD SAKWA ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England First published 2015 New version 2016 ISBN 978-1-910814-14-7 (Paperback) ISBN 978-1-910814-00-0 (e-book) This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries. Other than the license terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials / scholarly use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukraine Crisis and Its Impact on Transforming Russian Nationalism Landscape Written by Marlene Laruelle
    The Ukraine Crisis and its Impact on Transforming Russian Nationalism Landscape Written by Marlene Laruelle This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. The Ukraine Crisis and its Impact on Transforming Russian Nationalism Landscape https://www.e-ir.info/2015/04/07/the-ukraine-crisis-and-its-impact-on-transforming-russian-nationalism-landscape/ MARLENE LARUELLE, APR 7 2015 This is an excerpt from Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives – an E-IR Edited Collection. Available now on Amazon (UK, USA, Fra, Ger, Ca), in all good book stores, and via a free PDF download. Find out more about E-IR’s range of open access books here. The Ukrainian crisis shattered the ideological status quo in Russia, the place of so-called ‘Russian nationalists’ in the public space, and the competition between different groups claiming to represent the authentic interests of the Russian state. In this article, I discuss the three main impacts of the Ukrainian crisis on the landscape of Russian nationalism: its division in interpreting the several crises, its successes in framing the Novorossiya narrative, and its ambivalences at debating the relationship between an imperial appeal and xenophobic feelings. Three Ukrainian Crises – Three Responses by Russian Nationalists The first phase of the crisis in Ukraine – the Euromaidan – has created deep divisions within nationalist movements. The so-called ‘national-democrats’ expressed solidarity with Maidan, seeing it as an example of successful grassroots democratic revolution against a corrupt and authoritarian regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Fear of Ideology: Political Theory and Political Practice in Contemporary Russia
    Institute for Political Studies UDC: 321.01+32(470+571) Serbian Political https://doi.org/10.22182/spt.18212018.7 Thought No. 2/2018, Manuscript received: 14.09.2018. Year X, Accepted for publishing: 30.10.2018. Vol. 18 pp. 103-126 Original scientific paper Stevan Gajić1 Institute of European Studies, Belgrade Fear of Ideology: Political Theory and Political Practice in Contemporary Russia Abstract The battle of ideas has raged in Russia since the times of Peter the Great and Catharine the Great and continues even today. The front line is between the lib- erals (Westernisers, Europhiles) and a camp that could broadly be called con- servatives (Slavophiles, Eurasianist). Today’s Russia faces a new challenge, having emerged from a rigid communist system, as before in history the country is faced with soul-searching. In today’s Russia there are three broad ideological camps: liberals, conservatives and realists. Beyond this division they can be defined as systemic and non-systemic, according to whether they are recognised as legitimate by the Kremlin and whether they themselves see the state as a legitimate actor. Liberals and conservatives can be in or out of the system, but not the realists, who because of their centrist position are voluntarily locked in to the system. In this article, I explore the dynamics between the three camps, the attitude of the state towards them and their representation in institutions such as universities and the media. I also determine their positions through a set of test questions pertaining to the 1993 Constitution, the Russian Central Bank and the conflict in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominant Narratives in Russian Political and Media Discourse During the Ukraine Crisis
    The University of Manchester Research Dominant Narratives in Russian Political and Media Discourse during the Ukraine Crisis Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Hutchings, S., & Szostek, J. (2015). Dominant Narratives in Russian Political and Media Discourse during the Ukraine Crisis. In A. Pikulicka-Wilcewska, & R. Sakwa (Eds.), Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives E-International Relations Publishing. http://www.e-ir.info/2015/04/28/dominant-narratives-in- russian-political-and-media-discourse-during-the-crisis/ Published in: Ukraine and Russia Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:04. Oct. 2021 EDITED COLLECTION E-IR.INFO Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives i Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives EDITED BY AGNIESZKA PIKULICKA-WILCZEWSKA & RICHARD SAKwa Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, UK 2015 The material herein is published under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electoral System of the Russian Federation
    The original of this publication was published as the research commissioned by the Policy Department for the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament within a framework contract with IRIS. The original version was published separately by the EP (Policy Department for External Policies) in 2011 (number PE 433.688). Copyrights belong to the European Parliament April 2011 THE EU-RUSSIA CENTRE REVIEW The electoral system of the Russian Federation Issue Seventeen CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Introduction 6 Background 6 The evolution of electoral law 7 Roles of legislative and executive branches 9 The Federal Assembly 9 Presidential powers 9 Elections under each President 10 The Yeltsin years 10 New constitution – President versus Parliament 10 Development of political parties under Yeltsin 11 The first three legislative elections 11 Presidential elections 1991 – 1996 13 International Reactions 13 Assessment of the Yeltsin period 15 The Putin years 16 Rise of United Russia 16 Presidential Elections 2000 - 2004 17 Changes during Putin‘s presidency 17 Control of the Media 18 International reactions 18 Assessment of Putin‘s presidency 21 Medvedev‘s Presidency 21 Modernisation Strategy 22 Electoral changes under Medvedev 22 Recent developments 23 Assessment of Medvedev‘s presidency 23 Political parties and electoral support 23 2 Russia‘s party system 23 Law on political parties 23 Funding of parties 24 Role of parties 25 Voter turnout 27 Voter attitudes 28 On political opposition 28 On electoral rules 28 On a personal cult of Putin 28 International reactions 28 Conclusion 29 Annex I: Presidential Election Results 1991-2008 33 Annex II: State Duma Election Results 1993-2007 35 Annex III: The Levada Centre surveys – Public Opinion 37 Bibliography 41 3 A study for the European Parliament by Professor Bill Bowring, Birkbeck College, London, member of the Advisory Board of the EU-Russia Centre1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Ukraine
    Chatham House Report Timothy Ash, Janet Gunn, John Lough, Orysia Lutsevych, James Nixey, James Sherr and Kataryna Wolczuk The Struggle for Ukraine Chatham House Report Timothy Ash, Janet Gunn, John Lough, Orysia Lutsevych, James Nixey, James Sherr and Kataryna Wolczuk Russia and Eurasia Programme | October 2017 The Struggle for Ukraine The Royal Institute of International Affairs Chatham House 10 St James’s Square London SW1Y 4LE T: +44 (0) 20 7957 5700 F: + 44 (0) 20 7957 5710 www.chathamhouse.org Charity Registration No. 208223 Copyright © The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2017 Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, does not express opinions of its own. The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publishers. ISBN 978 1 78413 243 9 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Printed and bound in Great Britain by Latimer Trend. The material selected for the printing of this report is manufactured from 100% genuine de-inked post-consumer waste by an ISO 14001 certified mill and is Process Chlorine Free. Typeset by Soapbox, www.soapbox.co.uk Cover image: A banner marking the first anniversary of Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea is hung during a plenary session of Ukraine’s parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, in Kyiv on 6 March 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Same Old Modernisation Game? Russian Interpretations of Modernisation
    The same old modernisation game? Russian interpretations of modernisation CEPS Working Document No. 337/September 2010 Félix Krawatzek and Roderick Kefferpütz Abstract The modernisation of Russia has been a topic of vigorous debate for centuries. It has also been an intensely divisive issue among Russia’s elite, and since President Dmitry Medvedev came to power, modernisation has become the leitmotif of the presidency. The global economic crisis hit Russia hard, meaning that the status quo in political, economic and social terms is no longer acceptable. However, there are a number of competing visions on modernisation within the Russian political elite and society as a whole. This Working Document aims to illustrate the diversity of and competition for the dominance of views on Russia’s future. In a second step, the authors analyse the obstacles to a successful realisation of the ambitious modernisation agenda and outline the implications for the new EU-Russia modernisation partnership. CEPS Working Documents are intended to give an indication of work being conducted within CEPS research programmes and to stimulate reactions from other experts in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with they are associated. ISBN 978-94-6138-049-4 Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.eu) © Centre for European Policy Studies, 2010 Contents A new urgency to modernise ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]