DOCSLIB.ORG

The Atlantic Republican Tradition: the Republic of the Seven Provinces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Atlantic Republican Tradition: the Republic of the Seven Provinces The Atlantic Republican Tradition: The Republic of the Seven Provinces J. G. A. Pocock Johns Hopkins University A CONFERENCE WAS HELD AT the Clark Memorial Library in April 2009, under the title “The Limits of the Atlantic Republican Tradition.” This inescapably carried some normative implica- tions. It was assumed that participants in general agreed on what this “tradition” was and aimed to look at its “limits,” though it was less clear whether the aim was to fix them, to look beyond them, or to dissolve them. There further hung over the conference the implication—though this was affirmed by nobody—that there existed an entity, alternatively a concept, of “republican- ism,” which might be better defined, whether as a theoretical category or as a historical phe- nomenon, in some ways than in others. The conference avoided sterile disputations, but—as is common and indeed healthy on such occasions—the subject with which it had dealt was rather discovered in retrospect than agreed upon in advance. This article offers such a retrospective view and argues that the conference dealt on the whole with two historical narratives, different to the point where they might almost invite the metaphor of the elephant and the whale; but that these organisms (to continue the metaphor) shared a common evolutionary history with some comparable outcomes. “The Atlantic republican tradition” continued—perhaps in consequence of the impulse to set “limits” to it—to be defined much as it was in The Machiavellian Moment, published in 1975 with the subtitle “Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition.”1 The writer of this essay, as author of the original title, reports that he has in some ways re-narrated 1 J. G. A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975; reissued with a new afterword, 2003). Pocock, J. G. A. “The Atlantic Republican Tradition: The Republic of the Seven Provinces.” Republics of Letters: A Journal for the Study of Knowledge, Politics, and the Arts 2, no. 1 (December 15, 2010): http://rofl.stanford.edu/node/72. 2 REPUBLICS OF LETTERS the history it offered in a more recent study entitled The First Decline and Fall,2 elements of which are taken up and employed here. Common to both volumes, however, is the thesis whose “limits” were to be explored at the conference: how certain narratives about Roman history, en- tailing an ideal of “republican”3 government and the historic causes of its transformation into a principate, were formulated (not originated) in Florence during the last century of its “republi- can” history; taken up in England during its brief experiment with “republican” government and elaborated into a history of west European landed property and free citizenship; restated in Eng- land and Scotland after the revolution of 1688 as a critique of the military-fiscal state and com- mercial civil society that “Britain” now became; and imported into the English colonies beyond the Atlantic, where they helped to engender a debate between “ancient” and “modern” concepts of liberty important in the foundation and history of the American federal republic. This narra- tive—which by the way supplied the word “Atlantic” with such meaning as it bears in the title of The Machiavellian Moment—has been and still is debated in American historiography. The con- ference in 2009, however, did not continue that debate so much as set up and explore another narrative of republican history, which sets “limits” to the “Atlantic tradition” simply by present- ing itself as the latter’s other. This alternative “republican” tradition (or “republicanism”)—elephant, it might be sug- gested, to the Atlantic whale—takes shape on the borders of the Hohenstaufen-to-Hapsburg medieval “empire,” as certain cities and groups of cities—Swiss, Hanseatic, and especially Dutch—claim sovereignty for themselves within or without empire. These cities encounter one of the classical problems of the city state, ancient and medieval: that of the relations between the “few” and the “many” within the citizen body; and their lay and clerical elites, steeped in the ob- sessive neoclassicism of Latin Europe, are well aware that they share a history with Greco- Roman antiquity and draw upon it. It is of far-reaching importance in the history of the Euro- pean vocabulary that the majority of these independent cities are ruled by merchant patriciates, and that these denote their sovereignty, liberty, and social power by using a set of synonyms of the French bourgeoisie. This is the source of the pre-Marxist, Marxist and post-Marxist usage that denotes mercantile, capitalist and industrial social practices as “bourgeois,” with the implication that the triumph of the economic in defining the polity is the work of the freemen of corporate towns, a thesis a little difficult to present in English where there is no collective noun equivalent to bourgeoisie and the growth of capitalism is not originally the work of such a class’s rise to power. This has to do with the problematic of “the Atlantic republican tradition”; but it was not clear, at the Clark Library conference, just how far there remained a persistent desire to repre- sent “republicanism,” “liberty,” and “enlightenment” as “bourgeois” in origin, thus setting “lim- its” to the “Atlantic” alternative. Of these leagues of post- or ex-imperial cities and their regimes a unique place belongs to that which became the quasi-federated republic of the Protestant Netherlands. Not a city-state but a confederacy of cities aware of their municipal and imperial origins, it had perhaps less need of the image of the Roman republic than we shall see was the case with Florence. More 2 J. G. A. Pocock, Barbarism and Religion, vol. 3, The First Decline and Fall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003). 3 Recent literature has raised two questions respecting the changes of meaning from res publica denoting a governed society of any kind, to denote (a) the Roman regime that preceded the establishment of the Augustan principate, (b) a form of government specifically opposed to monarchy. These changes should be historically examined, but are presupposed in the present article. See James Hankins, ed., Renaissance Civic Humanism: Reappraisals and Reflections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000). POCOCK | THE ATLANTIC REPUBLICAN TRADITION 3 immediately to the history of republics in Europe, it grew, through its alliance with the Princes of Orange, into a powerful military actor in the wars of religion and the growth of a European states system; and through the mercantile energies of Holland and Zeeland, into a maritime empire on an oceanic scale, with slave-worked colonies in the Caribbean, a small but momentous colony of settlement at the Cape of Good Hope, and an empire in Indonesia equal in extent to that the British acquired in India. None of these seems to have entered into dialogue and dialectic with the metropolis as did the English and Iberian colonies in America; the political thought of the Dutch Republic centered on its European self. In the history of “republicanism”—assuming there to be such an entity—the primary characteristic of its theory and discourse is that these are in the full sense of the word bourgeois: they assume the city to be a mercantile corporation and citizenship to be an engagement in trade.4 For a “golden age” coinciding roughly with the seven- teenth century C.E., the provinces forming the Union of Utrecht developed an urban consumer culture of extraordinary self-confidence, within which, however, they debated often bitterly the distribution of sovereignty among themselves and between themselves and the unique institu- tion of the stadholderate identified with the Princes of Orange. They also debated Calvinist the- ology and culture in ways that became involved with the former debate. The presence at the Clark Library conference of a group of scholars skilled in Dutch intellectual history caused it to become the principal alternative presented to “the Atlantic republican tradition” in the history of republican thought. At this point there arose the problem of the elephant and the whale. The two “traditions”— if that word is to be used—differed in context and ideology, if not always in vocabulary and con- tent. In the Dutch (as in the Swiss and Hanseatic) “traditions,” there was to be heard the speech of actual republics endeavoring to explain themselves to themselves and to others; whereas in the “Atlantic tradition,” the republic was increasingly—until the American Articles of Confed- eration—a concept and historical construct, employed to criticize and ultimately reorder the structures of the early modern state. It followed that concepts of property, liberty, commerce, and arms were very differently deployed in the two (if there were not more than two) cases. The Clark Library conference successfully avoided the trap of setting up a sterile competition be- tween incommensurables; but there remained the question of whether there could be found a history in which the two “traditions” diverged from shared positions and contexts. It seems possible to establish such a scenario, part historiographical and part historical. Leonardo Bruni, writing the first book of his History of the Florentine People in the early years of the fifteenth century, articulates a major theme of European historiography.5 With the expulsion of the kings, he says, the Roman people gave themselves liberty, and there followed the aston- ishing explosion of human energy that became known as virtus. This energy took a conquering form, and Roman liberty was the cause of its empire over others. Bruni, a naturalized Florentine from Arezzo, was not sure this had been beneficial; Etruscan culture had maintained many free cities and alliances, and it might have been better if these had continued to practice their several liberties, rather than the world’s becoming subject to the single virtus of Rome.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And the Jena 6: a Tragedy in Three Acts Anthony V
    Washington University Jurisprudence Review Volume 2 | Issue 2 2010 ‘Slavery’ and the Jena 6: A Tragedy in Three Acts Anthony V. Baker Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence Part of the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Anthony V. Baker, ‘Slavery’ and the Jena 6: A Tragedy in Three Acts, 2 Wash. U. Jur. Rev. 212 (2010). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence/vol2/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Jurisprudence Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. `SLAVERY' AND THE JENA 6: A TRAGEDY IN THREE ACTS ANTHONY V. BAKER* "WA remain imprisoned by the past as long as we deny its influence in the present."1 I. PROLOGUE: ART . AND CRAFT Law changes things. A world of received and perceived meaning lies within this three-word mantra—the mantra of the post-Hurstian2 legal historian. For the law-in-history legal * Visiting Professor, Atlanta's John Marshall Law School; Professor of Law, the Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law, Campbell University; LL.M, University of Wisconsin Law School (1998); J.D., University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill (1981); A.B., Duke University (1977). A draft of this paper was presented at the Southeast/Southwest People of Color Legal Scholarship Conference 2008, at North Carolina Central University School of Law in Durham, North Carolina. Thanks to conference participants for the helpful responses to the presented draft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger RE
    Much in Little Revisited: The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger R.E. Velema, Department of History, University of Amsterdam Paper prepared for the conference ‘The Republican Tradition: From the Hanseatic League to the Era of the Enlightenment’, European University at St. Petersburg, December 7-9, 2012 Not to be quoted or cited without permission from the author It is more than half a century ago that R.R. Palmer, who was soon to become famous with his magisterial work The Age of the Democratic Revolution, introduced an international scholarly audience to the Dutch revolution of 1795, also known as the Batavian revolution. In his pioneering article ‘Much in Little: the Dutch Revolution of 1795’, he pointed out that the fall of the Dutch ancien régime and the revolutionary transformation of the Netherlands that followed this downfall could best be understood as part of an international and interlinked series of revolutionary events.1 On a small scale, the Batavian revolution therefore could serve to ‘illuminate the whole complex of war and revolution which then gripped the Western world’.2 As he made abundantly clear in the title of his later magnum opus, Palmer had a relatively simple and straightforward view of the struggles that tore the Western world of the late eighteenth century apart. Just as democracy had been at issue in the Dutch revolution of 1795, the whole European and American world of the final decades of the century of Enlightenment saw the rise of a new and historically unprecedented democratic opposition against all sorts of aristocratic ‘constituted bodies’.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Revolution Institute Plan of Instruction on the American Revolution
    The American Revolution Institute Plan of Instruction on the American Revolution In order to ensure proper understanding and appreciation of the American Revolution and its legacy, the American Revolution Institute of the Society of the Cincinnati has developed this plan of instruction on the American Revolution for students in grades nine through twelve. The plan is designed to be followed during that part of a secondary school course on U.S. history that covers the period between 1754 and 1791, beginning with the French and Indian War and ending with the ratification of the U.S. Bill of Rights. The American Revolution Institute recommends that each state, or as local circumstances may dictate, each school district, adopt a version of this plan. The plan is based on the interpretive framework developed by the American Revolution Institute to organize and synthesize the enduring achievements of the American Revolution and presents them in a way that makes sense of an extremely complex series of social, economic, political, intellectual, legal, and constitutional developments spanning nearly forty years. That interpretive framework rests on the best advanced scholarship on the Revolution published over the last seventy years, an extraordinary body of creative work that places the American Revolution at the center of American history. Students taught according to this plan of instruction should learn that the American Revolution: • secured the independence of the United States from British rule; • established republics in each of the independent states as well as a federal government based on republican principles; • created American national identity; and • committed the new nation to ideals of liberty, equality, natural and civil rights, and responsible citizenship that have shaped American history for nearly 250 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fathers" in American History Dissertations
    EVOLVING OUR HEROES: AN ANALYSIS OF FOUNDERS AND "FOUNDING FATHERS" IN AMERICAN HISTORY DISSERTATIONS John M. Stawicki A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2019 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Ruth Herndon Scott Martin © 2019 John Stawicki All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor This thesis studies scholarly memory of the American founders and “Founding Fathers” via inclusion in American dissertations. Using eighty-one semi-randomly and diversely selected founders as case subjects to examine and trace how individual, group, and collective founder interest evolved over time, this thesis uniquely analyzes 20th and 21st Century Revolutionary American scholarship on the founders by dividing it five distinct periods, with the most recent period coinciding with “founders chic.” Using data analysis and topic modeling, this thesis engages three primary historiographic questions: What founders are most prevalent in Revolutionary scholarship? Are social, cultural, and “from below” histories increasing? And if said histories are increasing, are the “New Founders,” individuals only recently considered vital to the era, posited by these histories outnumbering the Top Seven Founders (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine) in founder scholarship? The thesis concludes that the Top Seven Founders have always dominated founder dissertation scholarship, that social, cultural, and “from below” histories are increasing, and that social categorical and “New Founder” histories are steadily increasing as Top Seven Founder studies are slowly decreasing, trends that may shift the Revolutionary America field away from the Top Seven Founders in future years, but is not yet significantly doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
    AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vichy France and the Legacy of the French Revolution
    5 CONTESTED SYMBOLS Lear Prize Winner Contested Symbols: Vichy France and the Legacy of the French Revolution This paper examines how Vichy, the authoritarian government in France throughout most of the Second World War, reckoned with the legacy of the French Revolution. I investigate this relationship through the regime’s treatment of four revolutionary symbols: the figure Marianne, the anthem “La Marseillaise,” the national holiday of Bastille Day, and the slogan of Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité. Because these symbols were deeply embedded in French social and political life, I argue that Vichy could neither fully reject nor embrace them; instead, it pursued a middle ground by twisting the symbols’ meanings and introducing alternatives in line with the traditionalism and ethnocentrism of its National Revolution. In doing so, Vichy attempted to replace the French Republic and the revolutionary values that it stood for with its own vision of the French past, present, and future. Emma Satterfield Written for History 457: Modern Revolutions 1776, 1789, 1917, 1989, 2011 Dr. Peter C. Caldwell SPRING 2019 EMMA SATTERFIELD 6 Since 1789, the themes and struggles at the heart of the French Revolution have been invoked and re-invoked at times of political crisis and change, from the empire of Napoleon to the brief Paris Commune of 1870. At the onset of the twentieth century, even as the Revolution grew more distant with the passing of time, its legacy remained central to the identity of both the French Republic and its citizens. This crystallization of French identity was made possible by the government’s use of a repertoire of revolutionary symbols embodying the ideals of liberty, equality, and brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Antoine Chrysostome Quatremère De Quincy (1755–1849)
    Classics at the Dawn of the Museum Era: The Life and Times of Antoine Chrysostome Quatremère De Quincy (1755–1849) LOUIS A. RUPRECHT, JR. It is therefore difficult, if not impossible, for someone not resident in Rome to write anything substantial about ancient art or obscure antiquities; even a few years in Rome is insufficient, as I myself have learned despite laborious preparation. It is not surprising when some- one says that he can find no unknown inscriptions in Italy: . one must know how to seek them out, and a traveler will find them only with difficulty. —Winckelmann, History of the Art of Antiquity, Preface Such was the effect, such was the fate of antiquity in the period I describe, when I visited Rome for the first time. Everything about this magical city contributed to entice my passion for antiquity and to enhance the beautiful illusions that enable us to recover the past and give it reality in the present, this radiance with which the imag- ination supplies the centuries that are long past. Such was the effect, almost a kind of magic, produced by Winck- elmann’s genius as well as by the spectacle of Roman antiquity. But this effect, it must be said, could only be produced in Rome, and by Rome. In vain do we convince ourselves that the antiquities taken from that city today can preserve their virtue. Everywhere else they are sterile, since everywhere else they lack the power deriving from their place; everywhere else they are disenchanted. They become images for which there is no mirror.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran: a Revolutionary Republic in Transition
    Iran: a revolutionary republic in transition in republic a revolutionary Iran: This Chaillot Paper examines recent domestic developments in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The volume presents an in-depth assessment of the far- reaching changes that the Iranian state and Iranian society have undergone since the 1979 revolution, with a particular focus on the social and political turmoil of the past five years. IRAN: It is clear that in many ways the Islamic Republic is in the throes of a transition A REVOLUTIONARY REPUBLIC where many of its fundamental tenets are being called into question. Profound and ongoing internal transformations in Iranian society already affect the country’s foreign policy posture, as some of its domestic and external issues IN TRANSITION converge and will most likely continue to do so. Pertinent examples are the nuclear issue and the socio-political upheaval in neighbouring Arab countries. Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi, the volume features contributions from five authors who are all specialists in various aspects of Iranian politics and society. Each Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi by RouzbehEdited Parsi Chaillot Papers | February 2012 author explores some of the most crucial variables of the Iranian body politic. Their focus on distinct dimensions of Iranian society and culture casts light on the changes afoot in contemporary Iran and how the political elite controlling the state respond to these challenges. ISBN 978-92-9198-198-4 published by phone: + 33 (0) 1 56 89 19 30 ISSN 1017-7566 the European Union fax: + 33 (0) 1 56 89 19 31 QN-AA-12-128-EN-C Institute for Security Studies e-mail: [email protected] doi:10.2815/27423 100, avenue de Suffren www.iss.europa.eu PAPER CHAILLOT 75015 Paris - France 128 128 CHAILLOT PAPERS BOOKS In January 2002 the Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) became an 127 120 2010 QUELLE DÉFENSE EUROPÉENNE autonomous Paris-based agency of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Culture and History of French Republicanism: Terror Or Utopia?
    47 The Culture and History of French Republicanism: Terror or Utopia? JAMES LIVESEY An everyday republic? In September 1870, Karl Marx, writing for the International, wrote an address to the French people celebrating the declaration of the Third Republic. Marx had no illusions about the regime, it was a compromise between radicals, moderate royalists and liberals, not the end of history. This alliance had inherited power, rather than achieved it, because of Bismarck’s military defeat of Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte and the inability of the royalists to agree on a king. Yet for all its flaws, the republic was genuinely progressive he argued; it was the best that could be expected of a bourgeois society. Marx went on to wag the finger of theory at the French working class, warning it not to upset the apple cart by opposing the necessarily bourgeois republic in prematurely revolutionary action. The republic was the most progressive political form possible in capitalist society, and would provide the context through which true liberty could be achieved. A year later, Marx was again writing to the French, this time to celebrate the revolution he had warned against the year before: ‘What resilience, what historical initiative, what a capacity for sacrifice in these Parisians!’, he exclaimed. ‘After six months of hunger and ruin, caused rather by internal treachery than by the external enemy, they rise, beneath Prussian bayonets, as if there had never been a war between France and Germany and the enemy were still not at the gates of Paris! History has no like example of such greatness.’ Even the level-headed Karl Marx could be swept away by the romance of revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2016 Noah R. Eber-Schmid ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    © 2016 Noah R. Eber-Schmid ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DEMOCRACY’S FANATICS: POLITICAL EXTREMISM AND DEMOCRATIC POLITICS IN THE EARLY AMERICAN REPUBLIC By NOAH ROBERT EBER-SCHMID A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Political Science Written under the direction of Stephen Eric Bronner And approved by ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Democracy’s Fanatics: Political Extremism and Democratic Politics in the Early American Republic By NOAH ROBERT EBER-SCHMID Dissertation Director: Dr. Stephen Eric Bronner Extending insights from contemporary democratic theory to the history of American political thought, this dissertation examines how extremism and fanaticism shaped practices of popular democratic politics during the American Founding era. Focusing on the ways that political actors advocated intractable positions and used passionate, intolerant, and often violent means to resist perceived obstacles to democratic political equality, this project demonstrates that extremism can be a democratic tool when it animates public opinion to resist and remove obstacles to political equality. Concentrating on the discourse of patriotism, zealotry, insurrection, and popular sovereignty surrounding the Boston Massacre and its memorialization, the unrest of Shays’s Rebellion, the political thought of Democratic Societies, and American reactions to the French Revolution, this dissertation argues that American democratic theory must rethink how popular democratic politics is conceptualized and address the theoretical question of what role a democratic politics shaped by extremism plays in the democratic life of the American polity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Topics in Napoleon's Proclamations to the Army
    Classica Cracoviensia XVI, 2013 10.12797/CC.16.2013.16.03 aGnieSZka FULińSka (jaGieLLonian UniVerSitY) ANCIENT TOPICS IN NAPOLEON'S PROCLAMATIONS TO THE ARMY τῶν δὲ κατὰ τὴν παράκλησιν λόγων ἅμα μὲν ἀπολογισμοῖς ἀκριβέσι μεμιγμένων, ἅμα δ᾽ ἐπαγγελίαις χρυσῶν στεφάνων, ἐπὶ δὲ πᾶσι τούτοις θεοῦ προνοίᾳ, τελέως μεγάλην ὁρμὴν καὶ προθυμίαν παρίστασθαι συνέ- βαινε τοῖς νεανίσκοις. Polybius 10.11.8 Sois toujours un héros, sois plus, sois citoyen. Voltaire, Brutus, Acte IV, Scène VI keYWordS: napoleon Bonaparte, military rhetoric, jacques Louis david SUmmarY: the present paper analyses the ancient topics and elements of rhetoric in napoleon Bonaparte’s proclamations to the army, as they come down to our times in his correspondence and memoirs. the main focus is on the exhortations issued during the early campaigns in italy and egypt, since they employ this kind of imagery to the greatest extent. the aim of the paper is to show that the content of these short proclamations, which had obvious propagandistic meaning, was deeply rooted in the Classical education, as well as in the French republican imagery, and also art and literature of the period, all together which shaped the early years of the prospective emperor. 29 Agnieszka Fulińska it would be trivial to say that napoleon was a genius of propa- ganda; the extant material and pertinent scholarship go hand in hand in corroborating this thesis. and, as Wayne Hanley (2005: 22) rightly put forward, the prospective emperor’s propagandistic career began very early, with the first major command in italy in the years 1796- 1797, when “through conscious manipulation of dispatches, corre- spondence, medallions, and, especially, of the press, napoleon cre- ated for himself the image of the revolutionary hero – a creation that enabled this once-unknown Corsican to become a household name, and, ultimately, a power to be reckoned with in France.” throughout his career Bonaparte would masterfully use the words and images to promote his person and rule, but also his ideas and reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Problems in the Era of the American Revolution, 1760-1791
    Major Problems in the Era of the American Revolution, 1760-1791 DOCUMENTS AND ESSAYS SECOND EDITION EDITED BY RICHARD D. BROWN UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY Boston New York Gender and Citizenship in a Revolutionary Republic 297 296 Major Problems in the Era ofthe American Revolution useful where they could-hauling water for teams that fired cannon, bringing food to ESSAYS men under fire. In British practice, with which the colonists had become familiar during the Seven Years' War, each company had its own allocation of women, usually Linda Kerber, author of the first essay, is May Brodbeck Professor in the Liberal Arts at the but not always soldiers' wives and occasionally mothers; when the British sailed, University of Iowa, and has published major studies of women in the Revolution and early republic. The analysis included here shows how deeply unsettling the Revolution was for their women sailed with them.... [I]n the original complement of eight regiments the politics ofthe sexes and the home. In Kerber's view, the fact that the Revolution did not that the British sent to put down the American rebellion, each regiment had 677 men tc~ swiftly alter women's rights and public roles should not be taken to mean that the conflict and 60 women, a_. ratio of approximately 10___ to 1.... Burgoyne's army of 7,200 troops <­v did not affect women's rights. Similarly, Professor Jan Lewis of Rutgers University, was followed by 2,000 women. American women attached themselves to the troops Newark, explains that women's citizenship was indeed recognized in the Constitution, and followed the armies because they feared to lose track of men with whom they t~ although that recognition was subsequently compromised.
    [Show full text]