An Uphill Struggle for the Right to Travel by Train

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Uphill Struggle for the Right to Travel by Train AN INDEPENDENT VOICE FOR RAIL USERS No 154 £2 December 2017 An uphill struggle for the right to travel Picture: Paul Tattam by train SEE PAGE 2 PAGE ONE PICTURE: Chinley (and many other stations) deserve better access Our page one picture shows red- The sun should be setting on diesels up there too. The £70 million coated MP Ruth George surrounded national initiative for full accessi- By Chris Austin by people on the footbridge steps of bility on the railways launched in [email protected] Chinley station in October. 2016 by Transport Minister Alex- Since the shock announcement The High Peak MP promised to ander Dobrindt started, interest- from Transport Secretary Chris deliver an 800-signature petition ingly, with smaller stations with Grayling in July which brought to the Department for Transport, Picture: Paul Tattam less than one 1,000 entries/exits to a close the ambitious electri- calling for better access to the per day. Additionally the Ger- fication programme supported station. man “Northern Powerhouse” of previously by industry and Gov- Lifts and ramps can be life- Nordrhein-Westfalen has its own ernment, Railfuture has been Picture: NETWORK RAIL transforming for people with £900 million programme for the working to understand the issues disabilities but they help virtually modernisation of 150 of its 697 and what is best for the passen- everyone else, especially those with stations between 2017 and 2023, ger, the freight customer and the prams, luggage and bicycles too. by which date 80% of its stations railway which serves them. And Chinley is typical of many other will have step-free access (cur- None of us believes that the pres- stations throughout Britain where rently 73%). ent position is tenable for long. improvements are long overdue The British railway authorities The Infrastructure & Networks Here, Paul Tattam of Chinley must catch up. Friday 13 Octo- Group has looked at the prob- & Buxworth Transport Group ber saw a very stimulating occa- lems in depth, and meetings have describes the background to the sion at Chinley Station when been held with experts includ- protest at Chinley the Chinley & Buxworth Trans- ing our own vice-presidents and port Group handed a petition chairman Chris Page. of well over 800 signatures to Branches and individual mem- “I have not been able to use my POWER POLITICS: Scotland’s busiest inter-city route between Edinburgh and Glasgow via Falkirk High Ruth George, MP for High Peak, bers have shared their views and is being electrified as part of EGIP (the Edinburgh to Glasgow Improvement Programme) local train station for over a year demanding that the Department ideas and much has been written to travel to Manchester with my for Transport improve access to in the trade press on the issue. the benefits of electrification to between the wars, and BR strug- remodelling is required to baby and my two-year old.“ the platforms at Chinley station. We are now in a good position to be spread more widely, more gled valiantly during its 50 years improve track geometry, raise When we conducted a survey of Turnout by members of the pub- set out our stall and to start cam- quickly, and the first reaction to of existence, but, after 113 years line speeds and provide addi- local rail users in late 2016, this is lic for the handover of the peti- paigning on this important issue the new trains on Great Western we still have only 34% of the net- tional capacity, before the lay- how a person living in a popular tion was extremely encouraging, for the long-term future of the (despite the unfortunate launch work electrified, although this out is frozen by the provision of commuter village on the Man- CHINLEY: Struggling with a baby buggy over the station bridge and Paul Abell, vice-president of railway and the country. day) is good, with vibration lev- accounts for over half the traffic overhead line, masts and signal chester to Sheffield main line at Railfuture, was able to be present els reported to be low when on carried. gantries. Chinley described her access to Why is it important? The funda- either a taxi to or from Hazel for a person with a disability, on the day. The Buxton Advertiser diesel power. There were government enqui- the railway. mental reason for electrifying is Similarly, the delay could be Grove in a district notorious for the Dutch equivalent of the UK’s reported in depth, and we were that the operation and mainte- But, as our vice-president Roger ries into the subject in the 1920s, used to revise plans to reduce No fewer than 114,000 passen- traffic congestion on the A6, or Passenger Assist scheme asks delighted that disability cam- nance of electric trains is cheaper Ford says, they are not the solu- and the Weir report of 1931 costs, and to identify and justify gers are estimated to use the sta- Edale – a small village which is the passenger to contact a well- paigner Chris Hughes had come and cleaner than diesels. tion to network electrification: looked at the technical issues separately the many add-ons tion every year, but they all have also inconveniently located. advertised number three hours along to support, but sadly, as a of overhead or third rail supply that were lumped in with electri- to be able to negotiate a foot- in advance to arrange a mobile In simple terms, a train with It does not have to be like this. wheelchair user, could not access electric motors and transform- Bi-modes are either and optimum voltage. The Mod- fication proposals and eventually bridge with steep steps which On a recent trip to the Nether- ramp for the train (as opposed to the platforms. ‘ ernisation Plan of 1955 included sank them. provides the only access to the the 24 hours requested in parts of ers is going to be lighter than one overweight electric lands there was such obvious We are hoping that the publicity a major programme, as did the single island platform. the UK). requiring diesel engines and fuel In July, the Government was provision for accessibility that generated will prompt the DfT tanks. trains or under- main line electrification report of faced with a project out of con- The bridge is treacherous to on our return home we checked Over the border in Nordrhein- to improve Chinley station so 1981, but neither were fulfilled as trol, and in political terms I can- climb and descend for a person With less time required on depot, powered diesel ones the Nederlandse Spoorwegen Westfalen, Germany’s most that this accessibility blackspot ’ intended. not see an early resumption of travelling alone with a pushchair website – and could not find a populous state has had a similar electric trains should have better The history of decision making becomes a community asset for availability, so fewer are required. There have been endless stud- the plans that were suspended. and infant, extremely difficult single example of a station with history to Britain of problems on infrastructure in Great Britain ies since, and more will follow. everyone. In environmental terms too, elec- The case for further electrifica- to negotiate with heavy lug- inaccessible platforms. It gets created by outdated rail infra- has not been good. The sad thing is that the great Faryal Velmi, director of Trans- tric trains are better, with zero tion remains strong as one ele- gage or bicycles, and wheelchair better. If assistance is required structure. But things are looking opportunity that was offered by port for All, recently wrote to emissions at the point of use, and Just think about the time taken to ment of route modernisation to users are simply not catered for the Government has been squan- Transport Secretary Chris Gray- capable of drawing electricity agree on the Channel Tunnel Rail improve the capacity, quality and – which rather makes a mockery Link, or runway capacity in the dered by the failings of the Great ling on behalf of 55 organisations from any power source, includ- resilience of the railway for pas- of the provision of three disabled In what is claimed to be a world first, infrastructure manager Prorail South East, and the same is true Western and Gospel Oak-Bark- to demand that as an immediate ing renewables. sengers and freight customers, parking spaces in the nearby sta- has completed a £26 million programme to make all stations on the of railway electrification. ing schemes. tion car park. priority all deferred Access for All There are other benefits too in but it may not be the first prior- Netherlands national rail network accessible to passengers who are Electric trains go right back to There is one benefit of the delay, Government-contracted fran- projects should be delivered by terms of the availability of power, ity. Our job is to articulate that blind or visually impared. It involves high-contrast platform edging, Volk’s Railway in 1883, and to however, and that is the opportu- chises should not be able to ignore the end of 2020, with additional which is particularly impor- case clearly and move opinion braille signs, tactile maps and the removal of obstacles. 1904 for the Tyneside electrifica- nity to carry out work in prepara- the needs of significant sections funding being made available in tant for freight where it could formers to the position where it The work is part of a broader initiative to improve accessibility for tion by the North Eastern Rail- tion for electrification in a rather of society in this way, especially the next control period.
Recommended publications
  • Saltford Parish Council
    SALTFORD PARISH COUNCIL Saltford Library, 478a Bath Road, Saltford, Bristol BS31 3DJ 01225 873300 [email protected] www.saltfordparishcouncil.gov.uk 19 November 2018 THE RE-OPENING OF SALTFORD RAILWAY STATION Saltford Parish Council wishes it to be known by all relevant bodies that the re-opening of Saltford railway station as part of the Metro West rail project remains a high priority for this Council. The ‘Saltford Station: Feasibility Study’ dated October 2014 prepared by CH2MHill was very encouraging. Option 1, re-opening a station on the existing large (historic) site, was estimated to cost £4 million under scenario A, have a benefit-cost ratio of 2:1, and a net “new” fare revenue forecast of £770,000 per annum based on two trains per hour. This does not include a further revenue stream from parking charges. Patronage was estimated at some 200,000 users/annum. Saltford Parish Council is aware that the availability of parking at or near the existing site has been misreported by some, possibly in order to undermine the case for the station. Demand for car-park spaces is predicted at 159 in 2021 rising to 236 in 2043. There are 144 car-park spaces available on the existing site (Ref. Study - Annex Diagram). This could be considerably increased with a two-storey layout. Furthermore, there is an identified site within 400m of the station which could provide an additional 175 spaces and “thus has the potential to cater for an increased demand for parking at the station” (Ref. Feasibility Report 6.3). Local knowledge suggests that there are further potential sites for car-parking in this vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rail User Express. We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News Items from Groups Around the UK. Please Keep Your C
    September 2019 Welcome to the Rail User Express. RUX is published around the middle of each month. It may be forwarded, or items reproduced in another newsletter (quoting sources). Anyone may request RUX as an email attachment, or opt to be notified when it is posted on the Railfuture (Rf) website. There is no charge for either service. Following GDPR, Railfuture Membership now maintains both lists. Please advise if you no longer wish to receive the newsletter or link, or if you know of anyone who would like to be added. For further details of any of the stories mentioned, please consult the relevant website, or ask the editor for the source material. RUX congratulates Network Rail (NR) for delivering £98million of vital improvements over the late August Bank Holiday weekend. Blessed with fine albeit very hot weather, a 10,500 strong team worked round the clock to finish 448 projects on time, allowing a normal service to resume on the Tuesday. Some projects such as track renewal and the transfer of signalling control will have an immediate benefit; some will enable an improved timetable in December, while others have laid the ground for future developments. But all contribute to the Rf aim of a better railway. Well done! Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line FoFNL is still awaiting news of any improvements, which seems to extend back at least a couple of years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Reopening Saltford Railway Station
    The case for re-opening Saltford Railway Station The development of a Greater Bristol Metro rail service and the electrification and re- signalling of the GW mainline that passes through Saltford offer an opportunity for Saltford station to be re-opened. Cost The station site as it is today Latest cost estimates are around £5.5 million for a two platform design. With the line, signalling, pedestrian bridge and “station footprint” in place, a basic station can be re-instated at modest cost. Business case A re-opened commuter station would serve 4,200 residents in Saltford, over 1,000 residents in the villages of Corston and Newton St. Loe (Duchy of Cornwall), and 4,600 students and staff on-site daily at Bath Spa University’s Newton Park Campus which is only 1 ½ miles from Saltford station. Residential places at the campus are set to increase from 400 to 900. 29,000 vehicles pass Saltford Station daily each weekday on the A4; some of this traffic would be able to park and use the railway service. The GW mainline Route Utilisation Strategy (2010) envisages an hourly shuttle train service from Bath Spa to Bristol Temple Meads. This service should serve a re-opened Saltford station. It would be a missed opportunity in the new in which over 400 said that they would be regular franchise if this commuter shuttle was able to users of a Saltford station. stop at all the existing stations but pass through The proximity of the Bath Spa University Saltford because it did not have a station.
    [Show full text]
  • ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report
    Group Strategy - Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report Document Control Scheme Name ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Document Ref. No. Document v:\sap-project\ca000000 - ecml 2020 orr\004 report\ecml 2020 Location capacity 1.2.doc Version No. 1.2 Status Final Author Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford Version Date 17/12/2014 Security Level Unrestricted Authorisation Control Ed Jeffery Signature Date Project Manager –Capability Analysis (Document Owner) Matt Rice Signature Date Operational Planning Manager © Network Rail 2014 Capability Analysis Page 2 of 78 Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report DOCUMENT CONTROL & ADMINISTATION Change Record Version Date Author(s) Comments 0.1 28/11/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford First Draft 0.2 28/11/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After internal review 1.0 04/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After external review 1.1 09/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After external review 1.2 17/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford Reviewers Version Date Reviewer(s) Review Notes 0.1 27/11/2014 Capability Analysis Internal Review 0.2 28/11/2014 R. Lewis, M. Rice, ORR 1.0, 1.1 04/12/2014 M. Rice References Ref. Document Name Document Ref. No. Date Rev East Coast Main Line 2016 Final 1 N/A 12/10 Capacity Review Principal Development Timetable for Thameslink 2 CA118385-1 15/06/12 Key Output 2 (2011 1.1 Iteration) ECML Line of Route GRIP 1 3 Study – Capacity Modelling
    [Show full text]
  • A1 Corridor Logistics Assessment
    AUGUST 2021 AUGUST A1 Corridor Logistics Assessment: Bassetlaw Council Final Report Iceni Projects Limited ICENI PROJECTS LIMITED August 2021 : Iceni Projects London: Da Vinci House, 44 Saffron Hill, London, EC1N 8FH Edinburgh: 11 Alva Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4PH Glasgow: 177 West George Street, Glasgow, G2 2LB Manchester: This is the Space, 68 Quay Street, Manchester, M3 3EJ A1 Corridor Logistics Assessment Logistics Corridor A1 FINAL REPORT t: 020 3640 8508 | w: iceniprojects.com | e: [email protected] linkedin: linkedin.com/company/iceni -projects | twitter: @iceniprojects 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 LOGISTICS PROPERTY MARKET AREA ................................................................. 2 POLICY AND LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................ 7 MARKET REVIEW – DEMAND ASSESSMENT ....................................................... 14 SUPPLY ASSESSMENT........................................................................................... 22 ROLE IF THE A1 IN WIDER MARKET CONTEXT ................................................... 26 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................ 28 APPENDIX A ..................................................................................................................... 30 0 INTRODUCTION Bassetlaw District Council has commissioned Iceni Projects Ltd to produce
    [Show full text]
  • Draft-Freight-Implementation-Plan.Pdf
    Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Role of Freight 4 3. Existing Conditions / Current Issues 5 4. Aspirations for Tees Valley Freight Network 21 5. Interventions 22 7. Action Plan 25 2 Draft Freight Implementation Plan 1. Introduction Tees Valley Combined Authority is the local transport authority for the Tees Valley. This is the Tees Valley Freight Implementation Plan, part of the first Strategic Transport Plan for the region, for the period up to 2029. It has been developed by the Combined Authority in collaboration with our five constituent Local Authorities, Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar & Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees. The Combined Authority has ambitious plans to grow the region’s economy and our Strategic Economic Plan aims to create 25,000 Our vision for new jobs and deliver an additional £2.8billion into Tees Valley by Tees Valley is: 2026. We are also developing a Local Industrial Strategy, an agreement between us and the Government on how we will To provide a high improve our economy over the next ten years and how this will quality, clean, feed into the Government’s overall UK strategy. quick, affordable, reliable and safe In order to ensure that everyone in Tees Valley is able to work, transport network study, enjoy and fully participate in these ambitious plans for the for people and future, we need a world-class transport system that also encourages inward investment. Transport is about connecting freight to move people and businesses in Tees Valley and beyond. Delivering a within, to and from world-class transport system that is fit for the future is a critical Tees Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Report
    SESplan MONITORING STATEMENT VERSION 8.1 CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE ......................................................................................... 1 2. REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS ........................................................ 2 EDINBURGH AND THE LOTHIAN‟S STRUCTURE PLAN 2015 .................................... 2 FIFE STRUCTURE PLAN 2006 - 2026 .......................................................................... 6 SCOTTISH BORDERS STRUCTURE PLAN 2001 - 2018 .............................................. 8 3. MONITORING THE CHANGES ...................................................... 11 POPULATION .............................................................................................................. 11 HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 14 ECONOMY .................................................................................................................. 20 TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................... 30 INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................... 36 HAZARDS .................................................................................................................... 41 MINERALS ................................................................................................................... 43 WASTE .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for a Bigger, Better Railway No 162 £3 December 2019 Pictures: INTERCITY RAILFREIGHT Pictures: INTERCITY
    Published by RAILFUTURE – campaigning for a bigger, better railway No 162 £3 December 2019 Pictures: INTERCITY RAILFREIGHT Pictures: INTERCITY Inter-city trains and bikes How rail freight can help combat the climate emergency: See page 2 RAILFUTURE CAMPAIGNER OF THE YEAR 2020 Railwatch contents HS2 must be just the start of a rail future CLIMATE Further to the inaugural recognition we would like 2 Chris Page award at Railfuture’s to hear about them. We will By Graham Nalty annual general meeting require a written statement 3 High speed rail in Cardiff in 2019, of no more than 500 4 East Anglia and East Midlands High Speed Two must be EMERGENCY and in recognition of words identifying how the given the go-ahead because the page one picture the dedication and nominee has contributed to 5 Pennine fast track benefits of faster north-south rail achievements of Railfuture Railfuture’s mission to be links and additional capacity 6 North East Rover Picture: XINHUA volunteers, we will be the number one advocate outweigh the increase in costs to Our front page pictures from presenting the award for for rail users and the rail 7 Investment stasis £88 billion. Campaigner of the Year at industry, and how they 8 Your views The verdict came from the intercity railfreighT show the annual general meeting have enhanced Railfuture’s Oakervee report which was a cycle courier in Oxford in Birmingham on Saturday campaigning for a bigger, 10 Severnside and Wessex leaked in November in the face bringing a pathology 27 June 2020. better railway.
    [Show full text]
  • Warehousing-And-Logistics-In-Leicester-And-Leicestershire-Managing-Growth-And-Change
    Warehousing and Logistics in Leicester and Leicestershire: Managing growth and change Leicester and Leicestershire Authorities Final Report April 2021 Prepared by GL Hearn 65 Gresham Street London EC2V 7NQ T +44 (0)20 7851 4900 glhearn.com With MDS Transmodal Ltd Iceni Projects Ltd Public Warehousing and Logistics in Leicester and Leicestershire: Managing growth and change, April 2021 Leicester and Leicestershire Authorities, Final Report Contents Section Page 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 Key messages from the report 10 1 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 20 Context 21 Study Area 21 Stakeholders 23 2 DRIVERS FOR CHANGE IN THE LOGISTICS MARKET 24 Better Delivery: The Challenge for Freight 24 National Planning Policy Framework and Planning Practice Guidance 31 National Planning Statement for National Networks 34 The Growth of E-commerce 35 Rail Freight Trends and Forecasts 41 Rail Network Enhancements 45 Highway Network Enhancements 50 Brexit 52 3 WAREHOUSING STOCK POSITION (2019) 60 4 PROPERTY MARKET REVIEW 67 Warehouse / Industrial Market Review 67 Warehousing Floorspace 70 Agent Consultation: Key Drivers and Trends 82 5 EXISTING SRFI RAIL FREIGHT VOLUMES 85 6 WAREHOUSE LAND SUPPLY AND SUPPLY TRAJECTORY, LEICESTERSHIRE AND ‘GOLDEN TRIANGLE’ 87 7 ESTIMATES FOR FUTURE STRATEGIC WAREHOUSING NEED – LABOUR DEMAND AND COMPLETIONS TRENDS 90 Labour Demand Model 90 Baseline Forecasts 94 Completions Trend Model 98 8 ESTIMATES FOR FUTURE STRATEGIC WAREHOUSING NEED – REPLACEMENT AND TRAFFIC GROWTH 102 9 TESTING DEMAND FORECASTS AND SUPPLY 113 Road Only Sites – Demand and Supply 122 10 FUTURE WAREHOUSE FLOORSPACE GROWTH SCENARIOS SUMMARY 127 GL Hearn Page 2 of 209 P:\Projects\Harborough District Council - Future of Wareshousing in Leicestershire - 20-322\4.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Report
    SESplan MONITORING STATEMENT VERSION 7 CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE ......................................................................................... 1 2. REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS ........................................................ 2 EDINBURGH AND THE LOTHIANS STRUCTURE PLAN 2015 ................................... 2 FIFE STRUCTURE PLAN 2006 - 2026 .......................................................................... 6 SCOTTISH BORDERS STRUCTURE PLAN 2001 - 2018 ............................................. 8 3. MONITORING THE CHANGES ...................................................... 11 POPULATION ............................................................................................................. 11 HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 14 ECONOMY .................................................................................................................. 20 TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................... 30 INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................... 36 HAZARDS ................................................................................................................... 41 MINERALS .................................................................................................................. 43 WASTE .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Soon Is Now?
    HOW SOON IS NOW? The disruption and evolution of logistics and industrial property 2 3 INDEX INTRODUCTION AND INVESTMENT AND 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 DEVELOPMENT Introduction The investor view Executive summary Tipping the scales Addleshaw Goddard Policy recommendations A shift in shed requirements has led to big changes for the logistics sector M&G Real Estate Big is beautiful: why investors are chasing prime industrial assets Tritax Big Box Industrial is the high street of the future Legal & General Investment Management Mid-sized spread BMO Real Estate Partners Getting the fundamentals right Oxenwood Real Estate LLP Developer focus Trophy assets: a new perspective Addleshaw Goddard Fitting out and fitting in: how developers are making speculative development and mixed-use logistics schemes work Kier Property The Caddick case study Caddick Group Omega Warrington Miller Developments Direct rail termini can be a boon for logistics parks Verdion iPort 4 Market perspective INFRASTRUCTURE - WHAT ALTERNATIVES ARE 3 THERE TO ROAD? Challenges in the UK Logistics Market Savills Unlocking investment for rail as well as multi- modal sheds A commercial property trends perspective Addleshaw Goddard Aberdeen Asset Management Superports: why we need them and how to get them A regional view DP World London Gateway Gent Visick The importance of rail MDS Transmodal A European and global view Where needs investment, and how do we unlock it? Rail Freight Group A European view CBRE Global Investors A train wagon capacity perspective VTG Rail UK Cheap labour
    [Show full text]
  • Portishead Branch Line (Metrowest Phase 1)
    Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR040011 Applicant: North Somerset District Council 9.4 ExA.RR.D1.V2 - Comments on Relevant Representations Author: North Somerset District Council Version: 2 Date: November 2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL DOCUMENT PROPERTIES Author SP, NSDC Title PRINCIPAL TRANSPORT POLICY OFFICER (NORTH SOMERSET DISTRICT COUNCIL, METROWEST PHASE 1 PROJECT TEAM) Document 9.4 ExA.RR.D1.V2 Reference VERSION HISTORY Date Version Status Description/changes 20/09/2020 1 DRAFT SP, NSDC initial draft 02/11/2020 2 FINAL Final 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the document.......................................................................................................... 2 Structure of the document ........................................................................................................ 2 2. THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO RELEVANT REPRESENTATIONS ............................... 3 Table 1 - The Applicant’s response to Relevant Representations ............................................ 3 Table 2 – The Applicant’s Response to Additional Submissions ...........................................326 Appendix A – Response to Portishead Town Council Appendix B – Response to Pill and Easton-In-Gordano Parish Council Appendix C – Response to Barry Cash Appendix D – Response to Freightliner Appendix E – Response to Bristol Port Company Appendix F – Response to Mrs Freestone
    [Show full text]