DOCSLIB.ORG

ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report Group Strategy - Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report Document Control Scheme Name ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Document Ref. No. Document v:\sap-project\ca000000 - ecml 2020 orr\004 report\ecml 2020 Location capacity 1.2.doc Version No. 1.2 Status Final Author Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford Version Date 17/12/2014 Security Level Unrestricted Authorisation Control Ed Jeffery Signature Date Project Manager –Capability Analysis (Document Owner) Matt Rice Signature Date Operational Planning Manager © Network Rail 2014 Capability Analysis Page 2 of 78 Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report DOCUMENT CONTROL & ADMINISTATION Change Record Version Date Author(s) Comments 0.1 28/11/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford First Draft 0.2 28/11/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After internal review 1.0 04/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After external review 1.1 09/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After external review 1.2 17/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford Reviewers Version Date Reviewer(s) Review Notes 0.1 27/11/2014 Capability Analysis Internal Review 0.2 28/11/2014 R. Lewis, M. Rice, ORR 1.0, 1.1 04/12/2014 M. Rice References Ref. Document Name Document Ref. No. Date Rev East Coast Main Line 2016 Final 1 N/A 12/10 Capacity Review Principal Development Timetable for Thameslink 2 CA118385-1 15/06/12 Key Output 2 (2011 1.1 Iteration) ECML Line of Route GRIP 1 3 Study – Capacity Modelling CA128248 10/09/12 6.0 and Infrastructure Options ECML Capacity Options 4 Report to support Access N/A 11/09/14 1.3 Application Process © Network Rail 2014 Capability Analysis Page 3 of 78 Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report Abbreviations Acronym Meaning DfT Department for Transport DTT Development Timetable ECML East Coast Main Line FOC Freight Operating Company GRIP Governance for Rail Investment Projects IEP Intercity Express Programme IPG Industry Plan Group ITSS Indicative Train Service Specification L&NE London and North Eastern LDHS Long Distance High Speed NR Network Rail ORR Office of Rail Regulation RUS Route Utilisation Strategy TLP Thameslink Programme TOC Train Operating Company TPH Trains Per Hour TPR Train Planning Rules TSGN Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern (franchise) TSS Train Service Specification TT Timetable © Network Rail 2014 Capability Analysis Page 4 of 78 Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 7 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Report Structure........................................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Input Assumptions................................................................................................................... 10 2.4. Methodology............................................................................................................................ 12 2.5. Outputs.................................................................................................................................... 13 2.6. Communication ....................................................................................................................... 14 3. Long Distance High Speed Service Patterns.............................................................................. 15 3.1. Capacity over Welwyn Viaduct................................................................................................ 15 3.2. Option 1................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3. Option 2................................................................................................................................... 24 3.4. LDHS Findings ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.5. LDHS 7 tph options (Scenario A) ............................................................................................32 4. Section by section....................................................................................................................... 34 4.1. King’s Cross – Peterborough .................................................................................................. 34 4.2. Peterborough – Doncaster ...................................................................................................... 37 4.3. Doncaster – York..................................................................................................................... 41 4.4. York – Newcastle .................................................................................................................... 43 4.5. Newcastle – Edinburgh ........................................................................................................... 49 4.6. Doncaster – Leeds .................................................................................................................. 51 4.7. Leeds – York ........................................................................................................................... 53 4.8. Platforming and turnrounds..................................................................................................... 53 5. Freight and passenger capacity choices..................................................................................... 55 5.1. London – Doncaster................................................................................................................ 56 5.2. Doncaster – York..................................................................................................................... 58 5.3. York – Newcastle .................................................................................................................... 59 5.4. Newcastle – Edinburgh ........................................................................................................... 61 5.5. Doncaster – Leeds .................................................................................................................. 63 © Network Rail 2014 Capability Analysis Page 5 of 78 Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report 6. Other Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 64 6.1. Performance............................................................................................................................ 64 6.2. Power Supply .......................................................................................................................... 65 6.3. Safety and Operability............................................................................................................. 65 7. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 66 7.1. Key Findings............................................................................................................................ 66 7.2. Choices ................................................................................................................................... 66 7.3. Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................... 68 7.4. Performance and other impacts ..............................................................................................69 7.5. Next Steps............................................................................................................................... 69 8. APPENDIX.................................................................................................................................. 70 © Network Rail 2014 Capability Analysis Page 6 of 78 Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report 1. Executive Summary Network Rail has produced this report to present in more detail the capacity options presented in the “ECML Capacity Options Report.” In line with the project remit this report focuses on three LDHS service scenarios: 7 tph LDHS off-peak: choices around operating a 7 tph service pattern alongside revised TSGN service patterns 8 tph LDHS off-peak: choices around operating an 8 tph service pattern along the ECML route, and also the feasibility of operating 2 tph fast London – Edinburgh 8 tph LDHS peak: choices around operating an 8 tph service pattern alongside the suburban London peak service These service scenarios have been overlaid onto the ECML 2020 ITSS to produce a high- level set of development timetables. The key findings within this report can be summarised as follows:- An 8th LDHS path can be accommodated on the route, alongside the TSGN off-peak and peak suburban service. The full ECML ITSS cannot be accommodated in several locations, particularly between York and Edinburgh. In addition to the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rail User Express. We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News Items from Groups Around the UK. Please Keep Your C
    September 2019 Welcome to the Rail User Express. RUX is published around the middle of each month. It may be forwarded, or items reproduced in another newsletter (quoting sources). Anyone may request RUX as an email attachment, or opt to be notified when it is posted on the Railfuture (Rf) website. There is no charge for either service. Following GDPR, Railfuture Membership now maintains both lists. Please advise if you no longer wish to receive the newsletter or link, or if you know of anyone who would like to be added. For further details of any of the stories mentioned, please consult the relevant website, or ask the editor for the source material. RUX congratulates Network Rail (NR) for delivering £98million of vital improvements over the late August Bank Holiday weekend. Blessed with fine albeit very hot weather, a 10,500 strong team worked round the clock to finish 448 projects on time, allowing a normal service to resume on the Tuesday. Some projects such as track renewal and the transfer of signalling control will have an immediate benefit; some will enable an improved timetable in December, while others have laid the ground for future developments. But all contribute to the Rf aim of a better railway. Well done! Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line FoFNL is still awaiting news of any improvements, which seems to extend back at least a couple of years.
    [Show full text]
  • An Uphill Struggle for the Right to Travel by Train
    AN INDEPENDENT VOICE FOR RAIL USERS No 154 £2 December 2017 An uphill struggle for the right to travel Picture: Paul Tattam by train SEE PAGE 2 PAGE ONE PICTURE: Chinley (and many other stations) deserve better access Our page one picture shows red- The sun should be setting on diesels up there too. The £70 million coated MP Ruth George surrounded national initiative for full accessi- By Chris Austin by people on the footbridge steps of bility on the railways launched in [email protected] Chinley station in October. 2016 by Transport Minister Alex- Since the shock announcement The High Peak MP promised to ander Dobrindt started, interest- from Transport Secretary Chris deliver an 800-signature petition ingly, with smaller stations with Grayling in July which brought to the Department for Transport, Picture: Paul Tattam less than one 1,000 entries/exits to a close the ambitious electri- calling for better access to the per day. Additionally the Ger- fication programme supported station. man “Northern Powerhouse” of previously by industry and Gov- Lifts and ramps can be life- Nordrhein-Westfalen has its own ernment, Railfuture has been Picture: NETWORK RAIL transforming for people with £900 million programme for the working to understand the issues disabilities but they help virtually modernisation of 150 of its 697 and what is best for the passen- everyone else, especially those with stations between 2017 and 2023, ger, the freight customer and the prams, luggage and bicycles too. by which date 80% of its stations railway which serves them. And Chinley is typical of many other will have step-free access (cur- None of us believes that the pres- stations throughout Britain where rently 73%).
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Report
    SESplan MONITORING STATEMENT VERSION 8.1 CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE ......................................................................................... 1 2. REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS ........................................................ 2 EDINBURGH AND THE LOTHIAN‟S STRUCTURE PLAN 2015 .................................... 2 FIFE STRUCTURE PLAN 2006 - 2026 .......................................................................... 6 SCOTTISH BORDERS STRUCTURE PLAN 2001 - 2018 .............................................. 8 3. MONITORING THE CHANGES ...................................................... 11 POPULATION .............................................................................................................. 11 HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 14 ECONOMY .................................................................................................................. 20 TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................... 30 INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................... 36 HAZARDS .................................................................................................................... 41 MINERALS ................................................................................................................... 43 WASTE .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Report
    SESplan MONITORING STATEMENT VERSION 7 CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE ......................................................................................... 1 2. REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS ........................................................ 2 EDINBURGH AND THE LOTHIANS STRUCTURE PLAN 2015 ................................... 2 FIFE STRUCTURE PLAN 2006 - 2026 .......................................................................... 6 SCOTTISH BORDERS STRUCTURE PLAN 2001 - 2018 ............................................. 8 3. MONITORING THE CHANGES ...................................................... 11 POPULATION ............................................................................................................. 11 HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 14 ECONOMY .................................................................................................................. 20 TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................... 30 INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................... 36 HAZARDS ................................................................................................................... 41 MINERALS .................................................................................................................. 43 WASTE .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Station Or Halt Name Line Date Closed Station
    Our Station Station or Halt Name Line Date Closed Station remains Date Visited number (Aberdeen) Holburn Street Deeside Railway (GNoSR) 1937 (Aberdeen) Hutcheon Street Denburn Valley Line (GNoSR) 1937 Abbey and West Dereham GER 1930 Abbey Foregate (Shrewsbury) S&WTN 1912 Abbey Junction NBR, CAL 1921 Abbey of Deer Platform London and North Eastern Railway 1970 Abbey Town NBR 1964 Abbeydore GWR 1941 Abbeyhill (Edinburgh) NBR 1964 Abbots Ripton GNR 1958 Abbots Wood Junction MR 1855 Abbotsbury GWR 1952 Abbotsford Ferry NBR 1931 Abbotsham Road BWH!&AR 1917 Aber (LNWR) Chester and Holyhead Railway 1960 Aberaman TVR 1964 Aberangell Mawddwy Railway/Cambrian Railways 1931 Aberavon (Seaside) Rhondda and Swansea Bay Railway 1962 Aberavon Town Rhondda and Swansea Bay Railway 1962 Aberayron GWR 1951 Aberbargoed B&MJR 1962 Aberbeeg GWR 1962 Aberbran N&B 1962 Abercairny Caledonian 1951 Abercamlais Neath and Brecon Railway 1962 Abercanaid GWR/Rhymney Jt 1951 Abercarn GWR 1962 Aberchalder HR/NBR 1933 Abercrave N&B 1932 Abercwmboi Halt TVR 1956 Abercynon North British Rail 2008 Aberdare Low Level TVR 1964 Aberdeen Ferryhill Aberdeen Railway 1864 Aberdeen Guild Street Aberdeen Railway 1867 Aberdeen Kittybrewster (3 stations of this name, on GNoSR2 lines; all closed) 1968 Aberdeen Waterloo GNoSR 1867 Aberderfyn Halt GWR 1915 Aberdylais Halt GWR 1964 Aberedw Cambrian Railways 1962 Aberfan Cambrian Railways/Rhymney Railway Jt 1951 Aberfeldy Highland Railway 1965 Aberford Aberford Railway 1924 Aberfoyle NBR 1951 Abergavenny Brecon Road Merthyr, Tredegar and
    [Show full text]
  • CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan
    CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan June 2015 Contents – Introduction 3 – Changes to the plan 9 – List of Projects Rolled from CP4 10 – Summary 11 – England and Wales CP5 enhancement programme – England and Wales – funds 13 – England and Wales – projects – Cross route projects 38 – Electric spine 52 – Anglia 59 – Kent 68 – Sussex 75 – Wessex 77 – Western 92 – Wales 110 – LNE 113 – East Midlands 127 – LNW 130 – Scotland CP5 enhancement programme – Scotland – funds 141 – Scotland – projects 147 CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan Introduction Purpose The CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan sets out the outputs, scope and milestones that we are committed to deliver in CP5. It has an entry for every project and ring-fenced fund funded through PR13. It is used both by the regulator, to hold us to account, and by our customers and funders, to give them visibility of our plans. As well as describing our commitments through the periodic review, it also sets out the deliverables for other government sponsored enhancement schemes funded through the Investment Framework. The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) published the Final Determination on 31 October 2013. Network Rail accepted the Final Determination on 7 February 2014. This document is part of Network Rail’s response to the Final Determination. We have continued to develop our plans for Control Period 5. As we have refined our plans, elements have changed and we set out the changes from the draft plan in the ‘changes to the plan’ chapter later in the document. Change control and updates This document will be updated on a quarterly basis to report progress and to update projects where appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Main Line East Coast Strategy Utilisation Route 2008 February
    East Coast Main Line Route Utilisation Strategy February 2008 East Coast Main Line Route Utilisation Strategy February 2008 Network Rail 40 Melton Street London NW1 2EE Tel: 020 7557 8000 www.networkrail.co.uk 116/February 2008 Foreword I am pleased to present Network Rail’s The Route Utilisation Strategy proposes a Route Utilisation Strategy for the East Coast number of improvements to increase peak Main Line. This is one of the busiest and capacity on passenger services by making most successful railway lines in Britain. As provision for more or longer trains. These well as being an absolutely vital north-south include power supply upgrades; grade artery for long distance traffic from London separation at key points; additional and longer to Scotland via Yorkshire and the North East, platforms; as well as enhancing the Hertford the line serves many commuter and regional Loop. It proposes upgrading the line from passenger markets and carries significant Peterborough via Spalding to Doncaster for amounts of rail freight. increased freight use to relieve the East Coast Main Line, as well as gauge enhancements In November 2007, Network Rail published on key freight arteries to allow for larger trains. its Strategic Business Plan (SBP) for 2009 Additionally, infrastructure works to prepare for – 2014. This explained the extent to which the Intercity Express Programme will take place. passenger and freight demand is growing, and set out an ambitious agenda for growing These enhancements will deliver improved the capacity of Britain’s railway to meet connectivity between London and Yorkshire, this demand. the North East and Scotland through additional services and reduced journey times.
    [Show full text]
  • Trains for Northern England
    AN INDEPENDENT VOICE FOR RAIL USERS No 143 £2 April 2015 ‘New’ trains for northern England See page 2 and back page Pictures: NORTHERN RAIL Pictures: NORTHERN Page one picture LOCAL ACTION For 25 years the train pictured on page one expected to be available at half the cost of Yorkshire was crammed with commuters on the Bed- new diesel trains. ford-London Thameslink route. By Chris Hyomes Rail expert Paul Salveson said the con- [email protected] Now it is being refurbished and will enter verted trains could be a useful addition service in the north of England in May on to the regional fleet, and could be used n n Harrogate triumph the newly electrified route between Liv- on many local lines across England and The new Virgin-Stagecoach erpool and Manchester via Newton-le- Pictures: VIVARAIL Wales. franchise for the East Coast main Willows. He added: “As far as I can see its main line includes seven trains a day each Six of the dual-voltage class 319 trains will problem is the 60 mph maximum speed. way between Harrogate and London be based at Allerton depot in Liverpool However, there are quite a few routes on Kings Cross, just as Railfuture where the trains will be maintained. which the D-Trains would be appropri- proposed in a detailed submission ate and that have 60 mph maximum line The trains are being refurbished inside and to all three bidders, the Department speeds, including some quite long routes. out at Wolverton works in Buckingham- for Transport and the Office of Rail If acceleration is as good as it is claimed shire by Knorr-Bremse.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF: Appendix D Timetable Analysis
    Appendix D Rail Timetable Analysis AllanRail Allan Rail Solutions East Lothian Access STAG – Pre-Appraisal Timetable Report Reference 18/010 Date – May 2019 AllanRail Contents 1 Background 2 Long Distance Services 3 Existing local service (Edinburgh - North Berwick and Dunbar) 4 East Linton and Reston 5 New station for Blindwells 6 Reopening the former Haddington branch 7 Cross Edinburgh 8 Four tracking and/or possible High Speed Lines 9 Edinburgh Approaches 10 Options for Tactical and Strategic Interventions AllanRail 1 Background This report has been prepared as part of a suite of reports to consider the railway issues and potential interventions that may be available to meet the emerging needs of the East Lothian area. The key task for this timetabling report is to demonstrate possible options to increase the train services within East Lothian as part of the requirement to cater for planned growth in demand driven through increases in the number of houses and potentially also employment. It seeks to set out the wider environment which influences the way in which local rail services can be developed and then examines changes to rail services that could be considered to cater for existing and potential future requirements. It is, as befits a STAG Pre-appraisal, a high level resumé of the issues and what might be possible in a dynamic environment both in terms of rail services and local development. It does suggest some early interventions and opportunities, as well as longer term options. AllanRail 2 Long Distance Services The East Coast Main Line (ECML) through the Borders and East Lothian to Edinburgh is one of the most important long distance rail routes on the British network.
    [Show full text]
  • 252/13 Edinburgh Dunbar Berwick Upon Tweed
    Members’ Library Service Request Form Date of Document 01/12/13 Originator Head Of Infrastructure Originator’s Ref (if any) Document Title Edinburgh Dunbar Berwick Upon Tweed Study Please indicate if access to the document is to be “unrestricted” or “restricted”, with regard to the terms of the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985. Unrestricted Restricted If the document is “restricted”, please state on what grounds (click on grey area for drop- down menu): For Publication Please indicate which committee this document should be recorded into (click on grey area for drop-down menu): Cabinet Additional information: Authorised By Monica Patterson Designation Depute Chief Executive Date 01/12/13 For Office Use Only: Library Reference 252/13 Date Received 12/12/13 Bulletin Dec 13 REPORT TO: Members’ Library Service MEETING DATE: BY: Depute Chief Executive – Partnerships and Community Services SUBJECT: Edinburgh Dunbar Berwick upon Tweed Study 1 PURPOSE 1.1 To advise members of the submission of the Edinburgh Dunbar Berwick upon Tweed Rail study to Transport Scotland on 10th December in support of re-opening East Linton rail station. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 To note the content of the report. 3 BACKGROUND 3.1 A study commissioned by East Lothian Council, Scottish Borders Council and South East Scotland Transport Partnership (SESTRANS) was tendered in 2012 to further analyse and report on re-opening rail stations and East Linton and Reston. MVA Consultancy was awarded the commission. 3.2 The provision of a local service to East Linton is well supported by the community. The Rail Action Group East of Scotland (RAGES) has been actively campaigning for local service improvements on the line since 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad Options for Upgraded and High Speed Railways to the North of England and Scotland
    Broad options for upgraded and high speed railways to the North of England and Scotland March 2016 CS252 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5AB Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/hs2 This work has been jointly commissioned by DfT and Transport Scotland. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2016, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Britain by Rail a Prospectus for Change 1
    Connecting Britain by Rail By Robert Goundry, James Mackay and Jim Summers 4 February 2020 A Prospectus for Change: Summary 1 This prospectus considers what improvements can be made in train services and the existing railway network if HS2 is not built, giving transport and economic benefits to all the regions, cities and towns north of London which HS2 would have approached. 2 It explains why achieving these changes requires integrated management of the railway, its capacity, its spending on infrastructure, and the train services which run on it – though not necessarily integrated ownership. 3 It has been produced pro bono by a small group of experienced railway business and operations managers. It is not a detailed investment plan, but it gives many examples of the kind of improvements which can be made, and of the benefits of them. 4 Details of specific proposals are not included, but they could be provided if needed. In particular, for the West Coast Main Line, the route which HS2 has sought most strongly to supplement, a much more detailed proposal prepared last year could readily be circulated as an indicator of the kind of alternatives which could be applied on other routes too. 5 Implementing a programme of improvements which are not interdependent but are complementary would avoid the long lead time for a return on the single investment in HS2, and, by spreading risk, would reduce it very substantially. 6 Improvements are available in the short term by changing the way in which the capacity of the network and of train services on it are managed, which will we hope be enabled by the Williams review.
    [Show full text]