Broad Options for Upgraded and High Speed Railways to the North of England and Scotland
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Railfuture Response to Consultations on the Proposed East Coast Main Line Timetable May 2022
RAILFUTURE RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS ON THE PROPOSED EAST COAST MAIN LINE TIMETABLE MAY 2022 From: Railfuture Passenger Group & Branches: East Anglia, East Midlands, Lincolnshire, London & South East, North East, North West, Yorkshire & Scotland Submitted to: CrossCountry, Great Northern/Thameslink, LNER, Northern, TransPennine Express Copied to: East Midlands Railway, First East Coast Trains, Grand Central, Hull Trains, Network Rail & ScotRail Index Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 2 Strategic Interventions .................................................................................................................................. 3 LNER ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Responses to LNER Questionnaire ............................................................................................ 6 TransPennine Express .................................................................................................................................. 9 CrossCountry ............................................................................................................................................... -
TA 7.3 SNH Baseline Landscape Character
EUCHANHEAD RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT Technical Appendix 7.3: SNH Baseline Landscape Character 10/2020 www.stephenson-halliday.com A. Technical Appendix 7.3: Baseline Landscape Caracter A.1 SNH Landscape Character Assessment (2019) A.1.1 SNH recently republished their National Programme of Landscape Character Assessments as a digital map based LCA in 2019. This data was reviewed to take account of intervening technical improvements in website mapping to produce a revised national suite of landscape character type at 1:50,000 scale. This information was created in collaboration and consultation with FLS and HES as well as all local authorities. This also included a more consistent baseline description across Scotland. As this is an online document, the following is an extract of the landscape character citations for each character area assessed. A.1.2 Compiled within this document are the following SNH Landscape Chatacter Type Baseline documents: • LCT 073 - Upland Glen - Ayrshire (2019) • LCT 081 - Southern Uplands - Ayrshire (2019) • LCT 160 - Narrow Wooded Valley - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 165 - Upper Dale - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 166 - Upland Glens - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 175 - Foothills - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 177 - Southern Uplands - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 178 - Southern Uplands with Forest - Dumfries and Galloway (2019) Technical Appendix 7.3: Baseline Landscape Caracter 1 SNH National Landscape Character Assessment Landscape Character Type 73 UPLAND GLEN - AYRSHIRE Location and Context The Upland Glen- Ayrshire Landscape Character Type occurs in three places in Ayrshire, focused to the far south and east; the valley of the Afton Water, immediately to the south of New Cumnock, and Glen Tig and Glen App, draining to the Ayrshire coast, close to the boundary with Dumfries and Galloway. -
The Rail User Express. We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News Items from Groups Around the UK. Please Keep Your C
September 2019 Welcome to the Rail User Express. RUX is published around the middle of each month. It may be forwarded, or items reproduced in another newsletter (quoting sources). Anyone may request RUX as an email attachment, or opt to be notified when it is posted on the Railfuture (Rf) website. There is no charge for either service. Following GDPR, Railfuture Membership now maintains both lists. Please advise if you no longer wish to receive the newsletter or link, or if you know of anyone who would like to be added. For further details of any of the stories mentioned, please consult the relevant website, or ask the editor for the source material. RUX congratulates Network Rail (NR) for delivering £98million of vital improvements over the late August Bank Holiday weekend. Blessed with fine albeit very hot weather, a 10,500 strong team worked round the clock to finish 448 projects on time, allowing a normal service to resume on the Tuesday. Some projects such as track renewal and the transfer of signalling control will have an immediate benefit; some will enable an improved timetable in December, while others have laid the ground for future developments. But all contribute to the Rf aim of a better railway. Well done! Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line FoFNL is still awaiting news of any improvements, which seems to extend back at least a couple of years. -
ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report
Group Strategy - Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report Document Control Scheme Name ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Document Ref. No. Document v:\sap-project\ca000000 - ecml 2020 orr\004 report\ecml 2020 Location capacity 1.2.doc Version No. 1.2 Status Final Author Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford Version Date 17/12/2014 Security Level Unrestricted Authorisation Control Ed Jeffery Signature Date Project Manager –Capability Analysis (Document Owner) Matt Rice Signature Date Operational Planning Manager © Network Rail 2014 Capability Analysis Page 2 of 78 Group Strategy – Capability Analysis ECML 2020 Capacity - Timetable Assessment Report DOCUMENT CONTROL & ADMINISTATION Change Record Version Date Author(s) Comments 0.1 28/11/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford First Draft 0.2 28/11/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After internal review 1.0 04/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After external review 1.1 09/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford After external review 1.2 17/12/2014 Ed Jeffery, Amy Bradford Reviewers Version Date Reviewer(s) Review Notes 0.1 27/11/2014 Capability Analysis Internal Review 0.2 28/11/2014 R. Lewis, M. Rice, ORR 1.0, 1.1 04/12/2014 M. Rice References Ref. Document Name Document Ref. No. Date Rev East Coast Main Line 2016 Final 1 N/A 12/10 Capacity Review Principal Development Timetable for Thameslink 2 CA118385-1 15/06/12 Key Output 2 (2011 1.1 Iteration) ECML Line of Route GRIP 1 3 Study – Capacity Modelling -
An Uphill Struggle for the Right to Travel by Train
AN INDEPENDENT VOICE FOR RAIL USERS No 154 £2 December 2017 An uphill struggle for the right to travel Picture: Paul Tattam by train SEE PAGE 2 PAGE ONE PICTURE: Chinley (and many other stations) deserve better access Our page one picture shows red- The sun should be setting on diesels up there too. The £70 million coated MP Ruth George surrounded national initiative for full accessi- By Chris Austin by people on the footbridge steps of bility on the railways launched in [email protected] Chinley station in October. 2016 by Transport Minister Alex- Since the shock announcement The High Peak MP promised to ander Dobrindt started, interest- from Transport Secretary Chris deliver an 800-signature petition ingly, with smaller stations with Grayling in July which brought to the Department for Transport, Picture: Paul Tattam less than one 1,000 entries/exits to a close the ambitious electri- calling for better access to the per day. Additionally the Ger- fication programme supported station. man “Northern Powerhouse” of previously by industry and Gov- Lifts and ramps can be life- Nordrhein-Westfalen has its own ernment, Railfuture has been Picture: NETWORK RAIL transforming for people with £900 million programme for the working to understand the issues disabilities but they help virtually modernisation of 150 of its 697 and what is best for the passen- everyone else, especially those with stations between 2017 and 2023, ger, the freight customer and the prams, luggage and bicycles too. by which date 80% of its stations railway which serves them. And Chinley is typical of many other will have step-free access (cur- None of us believes that the pres- stations throughout Britain where rently 73%). -
Capacity on North-South Main Lines
Capacity on North-South Main Lines Technical Report Report October 2013 Prepared for: Prepared by: Department for Transport Steer Davies Gleave Click here to enter text. 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Technical Report CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... I 1 CREATING THE TIMETABLES THAT DETERMINE CAPACITY PROVISION IS A COMPLEX ISSUE .................................................................................................. 1 2 EUROPEAN COMPARISONS ........................................................................ 5 3 HOW CAPACITY CAN BE MEASURED ............................................................ 7 4 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES ..................................................................... 9 5 CAPACITY AND THE NORTH-SOUTH ROUTES ................................................ 11 West Coast Main Line .............................................................................. 11 Midland Main Line .................................................................................. 13 East Coast Main Line ............................................................................... 14 Route section categorisation: green/orange/red ............................................ 15 FIGURES Figure 5.1 Assessed post-2019 Capacity Pressures on North-South Main Lines 19 Contents Technical Report Summary 1. This note assesses the capacity of the North-South Rail Lines in the UK from the perspective -
Railway Study Association Program
The Hagestad Sandhouse Rail group presents….a Special Sandhouse Event Wednesday – Sept. 16, 2015 - 1:00 pm – 4:30 pm (followed by informal networking reception) Location: NU Transportation Center, Chambers Hall, 600 Foster, Evanston On Wednesday, Sept. 16, 2015, the Northwestern Transportation Center will host members of the Railway Study Association (RSA) - a group of British Railway and rail transit officers, suppliers, related professionals and academics associated with the London School of Economics - who will be visiting Chicago for a week long Study tour arranged by Michael Weinman (PTSI Transportation) – a fellow Sandhouse member. Sandhouse members are invited to join some or all of the presentations. RSVPs requested to: [email protected] British Rail / Sandhouse Program: 1:00 pm “ Railroad Safety in the United States” Professor Ian Savage, Associate Chair & Distinguished Senior Lecturer, Department of Economics, Northwestern University The presentation will look at the different types of contemporary safety challenges facing U.S. railroads and recent trends in the risks to employees, motorists at grade crossings, pedestrians and bystanders. It will also present some cross-modal risk comparisons. 1:45 pm “The Expansion of Intercity Bus Service in the United States and the Changing Dynamics of Bus/Rail Competition” - Joseph P. Schwieterman, Director Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, and Professor, School for Public Service, De Paul University Schwieterman will discuss the recent revival of intercity bus service in the U.S. and how this is changing the competitive mix of services that are available. He will draw upon his analysis to show how the amount of service has grown since 2008 and illustrate the growing investments in express services between cities separated by 100 - 350 miles. -
East Coast Main Line Route Study – Technical Appendices 5 MB
East Coast Main Line Route Study East Coast Main Line Route Study: Technical Appendix Demand and Capacity Autumn 2017 Network Rail – East Coast Main Line Route Study 02 The sections shows how standard class passenger Key Sectors /Groups of services Baseline demand is assumed to develop over the East Coast Route Study area over the next 2 to 3 The East Coast Route Study predominantly consists of the East Coast Throughout this section forecast demand is compared with decades, and identifies where this presents a Main Line (ECML) route sections from London Kings Cross to Berwick “baseline capacity”. The baseline capacities are based on what is and Leeds, but also includes a number of other route sections. These proposed to operate once the following CP5 Enhancement Delivery challenge to provide additional capacity: include Nottingham to Lincoln, Stevenage to Cambridge, the Plan projects have been implemented: Hertford Loop and the GN/GE route between Peterborough and East Coast Connectivity Fund projects including Huntingdon to Doncaster via Lincoln. • • a definition of the key sectors (groups of services) Woodwalton 4 tracking and Werrington Grade Separation. This on the route The East Coast Route Study area accommodates a number of facilitates a service predominantly worked by new Class 800 and different types of train services (sectors), which meet a particular 801 units ordered through the Intercity Express Programme (IEP), • a summary of the baseline capacities assumed for market need: with up to 8 LDHS services per hour into London Kings Cross. the route. This also includes the proposed freight loops between Long Distance High Speed (LDHS) services. -
Regional Scenic Areas Technical Paper;
DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY COUNCIL Local Development \ Plan Technical Paper Regional Scenic SEPTEMBER 2014 Areas www.dumgal.gov.uk Dumfries and Galloway Regional Scenic Areas Technical Paper; Errata: Regional Scenic Areas were drawn as part of the 1999 Dumfries and Galloway Structure Plan. The adopted boundaries were shown on plans within Technical Paper 6 (1999) and subsequently in the four Local Plans, adopted in 2006. The boundaries were not amended during the production of the 2014 RSA Technical Paper; however the mapping included several errors: 1. Galloway Hills RSA The boundary to the east of Cairnsmore of Fleet (NX 501670) should have included Craigronald and Craigherron but not High Craigeazle, Low Craigeazle or Little Cullendoch Moss (Maps on pages 12 and 19 should be revised as below): Area not in RSA Area should be in RSA Area not in RSA 2. Solway Coast RSA (two areas); St Mary’s Isle, Kirkcudbright (NX 673491) should have been included within the RSA boundary (Maps on pages 12 and 24 should be revised as below): Area should be in RSA The area to the west of Powfoot (NY 148657) should have been included within the RSA (Maps on pages 12 and 24 should be revised as below): Area not within RSA Area should be in RSA 3. Terregles Ridge RSA The area around the A711 at Beeswing (NX 897694) should not have been included within the RSA (Maps on pages 12 and 27 should be revised as below): Area not within RSA Technical Paper: Regional Scenic Areas Contents Page Part 1: Introduction 2 Regional Scenic Designations 2 Dumfries and Galloway Landscape Assessment 3 Relationship between the Landscape Assessment and Scenic Designations 3 Part 2: 1999 Review Process 5 Aims and Objectives 5 Methodology 5 Part 3: Regional Scenic Area Descriptions 8 Appendices 42 Appendix 1: References 42 Appendix 2: Landscape Character Types and Units 43 1 Part 1: INTRODUCTION The quality of the landscape is one of Dumfries and Galloway's major assets, providing an attractive environment for both residents and visitors. -
Issues Report
SESplan MONITORING STATEMENT VERSION 8.1 CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE ......................................................................................... 1 2. REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS ........................................................ 2 EDINBURGH AND THE LOTHIAN‟S STRUCTURE PLAN 2015 .................................... 2 FIFE STRUCTURE PLAN 2006 - 2026 .......................................................................... 6 SCOTTISH BORDERS STRUCTURE PLAN 2001 - 2018 .............................................. 8 3. MONITORING THE CHANGES ...................................................... 11 POPULATION .............................................................................................................. 11 HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 14 ECONOMY .................................................................................................................. 20 TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................... 30 INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................... 36 HAZARDS .................................................................................................................... 41 MINERALS ................................................................................................................... 43 WASTE ....................................................................................................................... -
Network Rail East Coast Main Line 2016 Capacity Review Draft for Consultation Response by Railfuture
Network Rail East Coast Main Line 2016 capacity Review Draft for Consultation Response by railfuture Question 1 Does the approach used provide an understanding of the demand for paths after 2016? 1 The study initiative to enhance the capacity of the route to meet the aspirations of stakeholders to increase service provision and serve new destinations from 2016 onwards is a welcome reflection of the need to grow the national rail network. 2 Whilst ‘London’ may numerically dominate passenger and freight traffic flows, there is an established need to enhance the provision for services to Scotland from stations across the national rail network, and between intermediate places. 3 Capacity enhancements are needed now and progressively in the future to meet the demand forecasts for passenger and freight traffic nationally and across the North of England, for example, in the Consultation Draft of the Northern Route Utilisation Strategy 4 Whilst the need to preserve some commercial confidentiality is appreciated, it is not clear that the aspirations considered in Section 2 (Paragraph 1.2.3 identifies the aspirants) are the same as those considered in Section 3 (Paragraph 3.4.1). Specifically, it is not known whether the constraints identified in Section 2 have been influenced by Network Rail’s imaginary aspirations included in Section 3 (Paragraph 3.4.1) and hence whether the conclusions of the respective Sections are consistent and compatible. 5 Capacity enhancements such as the reopening of the Leamside Line would deliver new business as well as expanding the capacity of the ECML route and providing for increased freight traffic. -
R01 HSUK Scottish Rail Strategy
HSUK SCOTTISH RAIL STRATEGY With Edinburgh and Glasgow comprising two of the UK’s principal conurbations, it is natural that both cities will be primary stakeholders in any future UK high speed rail network. Projections for HS2 show high speed lines extending northwards to both Edinburgh and Glasgow, and the scheme’s proponents claim major economic benefits accruing from accelerated North-South links, and environmental benefits accruing from short-haul air flows converted to rail. It is important to appreciate that the core rationale of any high speed rail system is to connect primary conurbations (of 500,000+ population), and this is likely to deter the opening of new lines north of the Forth-Clyde Line. Hence a major proportion of the Scottish population away from the Central Belt seems likely to see no direct benefits from the UK high speed rail project. These areas have been poorly served by rail since the ‘Beeching’ cuts of the 1960’s, and the economic impacts are continuing. The Scottish Government has taken significant steps to redress these connectivity deficiencies, with several rail routes reopened in recent years. But whilst the pace of Scottish reopenings far outstrips performance elsewhere in the UK, progress is still slow. It seems vital that the UK high speed rail initiative is developed in such a way as to extend operation of high speed services north of the Forth-Clyde Line, and in doing so to spur further reopenings. This will bring benefit to the widest practicable spread of Scottish communities. The following diagrams chart the development of the Scottish rail network, and illustrate the likely impacts of both HS2 and the alternative High Speed UK scheme.