sign in sign up
<<
Home , Brighton and Hove, Isle of Wight, Kingston upon Hull, Peterborough, South Gloucestershire

Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons

Southend-on-Sea vs CPA Environment High Scorers / Nearest Neighbours / Unitaries

BV 106: Percentage of new homes built on previously developed land

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04

Southend-on-Sea 100 100 100

CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 56.8 63 n/a 94 99 n/a 51 63 n/a East Riding of 24.08 16.64 n/a Halton 27.48 49 n/a Hartlepool 40.8 56 n/a 84 86 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 40 36 n/a 99 99.01 n/a 74.3 61 n/a 97 99 n/a 79.24 93.66 n/a 81.3 94.4 n/a South 41 44.6 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 33 29.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 58.4 61 n/a Telford & Wrekin 54 55.35 n/a 39 58.57 n/a

CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a & 99.7 100 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a 98.6 100 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a

Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 94 93.7 n/a Unitary Median 70 65 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 41 52.3 n/a Average 66.3 68.7 n/a Source: ODPM website BV 107: Planning cost per head of population.

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04

Southend-on-Sea 8.24 8.68 9.45

CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 7.26 7.53 n/a Bournemouth 13.95 14.43 n/a Derby 7.41 8.2 n/a 12.36 12.63 n/a Halton 8.22 9.88 n/a Hartlepool 7.73 8.31 n/a Isle of Wight 14.75 15.41 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 6.86 6.7 n/a Luton 8.82 9.11 n/a Middlesbrough 5.37 5.01 n/a Nottingham 8.63 8.48 n/a Peterborough 13.46 15.45 n/a Plymouth 8.09 6.12 n/a 13.81 13.09 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 8.3 9.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 6.86 7.04 n/a Telford & Wrekin 9.52 9.69 n/a Torbay 11.17 11.25 n/a

CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 7.26 7.53 n/a Bournemouth 13.95 14.43 n/a Brighton & Hove 9.91 12.28 n/a Isle of Wight 14.75 15.41 n/a Portsmouth 9.73 10.01 n/a Torbay 11.17 11.25 n/a

Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 13.5 14.1 n/a Unitary Median 9.7 10 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 8.2 8.5 n/a Average 11 11.5 n/a 109a: The percentage of planning applications determined within the Governments new development control targets to determine: 60% of major applications within 13 weeks

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04

Southend-on-Sea n/a 39 48

CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 46 n/a Bournemouth n/a 42 n/a Derby n/a 32 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 52.7 n/a Halton n/a 57.9 n/a Hartlepool n/a 61.9 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 42.5* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 55 n/a Luton n/a 49.45 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 31.6 n/a Nottingham n/a 44 n/a Peterborough n/a 36 n/a Plymouth n/a 24 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 40 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 60 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 51.28 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 41 n/a Torbay n/a 34 n/a

CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 46 n/a Bournemouth 42 n/a Brighton & Hove 21.74 n/a Isle of Wight 42.5* n/a Portsmouth 50 n/a Torbay 34 n/a

Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 49.5 n/a Unitary Median 40 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 31 n/a Average 39.5 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 109b: 65% of minor applications within 8 weeks

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04

Southend-on-Sea n/a 34 58

CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 67 n/a Bournemouth n/a 40 n/a Derby n/a 49 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 58.3 n/a Halton n/a 80.2 n/a Hartlepool n/a 59.1 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 62* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 53 n/a Luton n/a 58 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 70.4 n/a Nottingham n/a 60 n/a Peterborough n/a 68.55 n/a Plymouth n/a 34 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 49 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 55.56 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 70.4 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 58 n/a Torbay n/a 55.78 n/a

CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 67 n/a Bournemouth 40 n/a Brighton & Hove 46.76 n/a Isle of Wight 62* n/a Portsmouth 56.75 n/a Torbay 55.78 n/a

Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 62 n/a Unitary Median 55.8 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 46.8 n/a Average 54.1 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 109c: 80% of other applications within 8 weeks

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04

Southend-on-Sea n/a 48 71

CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 78 n/a Bournemouth n/a 70 n/a Derby n/a 65 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 77.2 n/a Halton n/a 86.5 n/a Hartlepool n/a 73.03 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 77.7* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 61 n/a Luton n/a 83 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 83.9 n/a Nottingham n/a 77 n/a Peterborough n/a 88.39 n/a Plymouth n/a 46 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 74 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 64.17 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 78.89 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 73 n/a Torbay n/a 66.21 n/a

CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 78 n/a Bournemouth 70 n/a Brighton & Hove 58.82 n/a Isle of Wight 77.7* n/a Portsmouth 76.95 n/a Torbay 66.21 n/a

Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 78.6 n/a Unitary Median 73 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 65.3 n/a Average 71.2 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 188: The number of decisions delegated to officers as a percentage of all decisions

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04

Southend-on-Sea n/a 79 88

CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 82 n/a Bournemouth n/a 88 n/a Derby n/a 91 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 76.22 n/a Halton n/a 88.9 n/a Hartlepool n/a 80.77 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 89.3 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 76 n/a Luton n/a 77.71 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 58.9 n/a Nottingham n/a 85 n/a Peterborough n/a 93.18 n/a Plymouth n/a 84 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 73.89 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 88.41 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 81.29 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 85 n/a Torbay n/a 77 n/a

CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 82 n/a Bournemouth 88 n/a Brighton & Hove 82.9 n/a Isle of Wight 89.3 n/a Portsmouth 91.6 n/a Torbay 77 n/a

Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 88.6 n/a Unitary Median 85 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 79 n/a Average 83.1 n/a 200a: Plan making - Do you have a development plan (or alterations to it) that has been adopted in the last 5 years and the end date of which has not expired?

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04

Southend-on-Sea n/a n/a NO

CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Derby n/a n/a n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a n/a n/a Halton n/a n/a n/a Hartlepool n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a n/a n/a Luton n/a n/a n/a Middlesbrough n/a n/a n/a Nottingham n/a n/a n/a Peterborough n/a n/a n/a Plymouth n/a n/a n/a South Gloucestershire n/a n/a n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a n/a n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a n/a n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a n/a n/a Torbay n/a n/a n/a

CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Brighton & Hove n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Portsmouth n/a n/a n/a Torbay n/a n/a n/a

Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary Median n/a n/a n/a Unitary 25th percentile n/a n/a n/a Average n/a n/a n/a 200b: If 'No', are there proposals on deposit for an alteration or replacement, with a published timetable for adopting those alterations or the replacement plan within three years?

2001/02 2002/03 2003/04

Southend-on-Sea n/a n/a NO Southend-on-Sea

CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Blackpool Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth Derby n/a n/a n/a Derby East Riding of Yorkshire n/a n/a n/a East Riding of Yorkshire Halton n/a n/a n/a Halton Hartlepool n/a n/a n/a Hartlepool Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight Kingston-upon-Hull n/a n/a n/a Kingston-upon-Hull Luton n/a n/a n/a Luton Middlesbrough n/a n/a n/a Middlesbrough Nottingham n/a n/a n/a Nottingham Peterborough n/a n/a n/a Peterborough Plymouth n/a n/a n/a Plymouth South Gloucestershire n/a n/a n/a South Gloucestershire Stockton-on-Tees n/a n/a n/a Stockton-on-Tees Stoke-on-Trent n/a n/a n/a Stoke-on-Trent Telford & Wrekin n/a n/a n/a Telford & Wrekin Torbay n/a n/a n/a Torbay

CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Blackpool Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth Brighton & Hove n/a n/a n/a Brighton & Hove Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight Portsmouth n/a n/a n/a Portsmouth Torbay n/a n/a n/a Torbay

Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitaries Unitary 75th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary 75th percentile Unitary Median n/a n/a n/a Unitary Median Unitary 25th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary 25th percentile Average n/a n/a n/a Average 111: Percentage of applicants satisfied with the service received

2000/01 20003/04

72 63

2000/01 20003/04 77 n/a 82 n/a 74 n/a n/a n/a 81 n/a 83.7 n/a 75 n/a 86 n/a 72.2 n/a 96.1 n/a 74.94 n/a 76.45 n/a 75 n/a 79 n/a 82 n/a 84.6 n/a 78 n/a n/a n/a

2000/01 20003/04 77 n/a 82 n/a 70.4 n/a 75 n/a 86.6 n/a n/a n/a

2000/01 20003/04 81 n/a 75 n/a 72 n/a 75.81 n/a CIPFA Planning Data Comparisons

Southend-on-Sea vs Nearest Neighbours 2002/03

Population: Planning and Planning and Development: Actual Staff Numbers at April 2003 - Full Time Planning and Planning and Estimated Total Development: Analysis Equivalent Development: Development: at 30th June of Net Expenditure per Actual Staff Budgeted Planning Policy Development Environmental Total Planning and 2003 1000 Population Numbers at April Employees (FTE) Control Initiatives Development (excluding capital 2003 (FTE) Staff Staff per 1000 charges) - Planning - per 1000 Population Total Planning and Population Development (£)

Authority Blackpool 142,300 5,102 5.8 17.9 - 23.7 0.17 0.17 Bournemouth 163,600 9,413 7.8 31.4 2.4 41.6 0.25 0.26 248,100 10,161 14.3 29.8 11.5 55.6 0.22 0.27 Isle of Wight 134,500 14,833 18.1 29.3 9.3 60.5 0.45 0.47 Portsmouth 190,300 2,291 7 14 3 24 0.13 0.14 Southend-on-Sea 160,400 12,935 6 18 5 45 0.28 0.29 Torbay 130,000 6,977 5.1 22.8 4.9 32.8 0.25 0.26

Number of Planning and other Applications 2002-03 Conservation of the Historic Number of Number of Appeals Environment Alledged Lodged with ODPM Applications Apllications Applications Size of Number of Breaches of 2002-03 submitted for Determined: by Determined: per Conservation Conservation Area Planning Control Authority to Authority Development Areas at April Consents investigated in determine Control Staff 2003 (Hectares) Determined 2002- 2002-03 03 Authority Blackpool - - - 116 - - - Bournemouth 2,065 1,902 61 543 12 750 85 Brighton and Hove 3,200 2,932 98 729 32 566 139 Isle of Wight 2,366 2,256 77 592 7 440 - Portsmouth 1,571 1,428 102 391 13 565 39 Southend-on-Sea 1,500 1,399 78 75 10 490 84 Torbay 2,075 1,903 83 813 33 482 57

Source: CIPFA Statistical Information Service - Planning and Development Statsitics 2003 Southend-on-Sea Planning BVPI Perfromance and Targets

Quick Check Performance Comparison Future Targets PI PI Description 2003/04 Comparative performance Actuals Actuals Actuals Targets Unitaries actual 2002/03 Targets Targets Targets

against 2002/03 against last was target 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2003/04 Lower Upper 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 top quartile year met?

Planning

Percentage of new homes built on BV 106 100% 100% 100% 98% 52.30% 93.70% 98% 98% 98% previously developed land

BV 107 Planning cost per head of population. £8.24 £8.68 £9.45 £10.26 £14.10 £8.50 £10.26 £10.26 £10.26

The percentage of planning applications determined within the Governments new BV 109a n/a 39% 48% 50% 31.0% 49.5% 55% 60% 60% development control targets to determine: X 60% of major applications within 13 weeks

BV 109b 65% of minor applications within 8 weeks n/a 34% 58% 50% 46.80% 62% 60% 65% 65%

BV 109c 80% of other applications within 8 weeks n/a 48% 71% 60% 65% 79% 80% 80% 80%

The number of decisions delegated to BV 188 n/a 79% 88% 90% 79% 89% 90% 90% 90% officers as a percentage of all decisions X

Plan making: Do you have a development BV 200a plan (or alterations to it) that has been New for n/a n/a n/a n/a No Yes n/a n/a No No Yes adopted in the last 5 years and the end 03/04 X date of which has not expired?

If 'No', are there proposals on deposit for BV 200b an alteration or replacement, with a New for published timetable for adopting those n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a n/a n/a Yes Yes Yes 03/04 alterations or the replacement plan within three years?

Previous survey 2003/04 Target 2006/07 2000/01 Actual

Percentage of applicants satisfied with the BV 111 n/a 72% n/a 63% (+/-7%) 70% n/a n/a n/a n/a 78% service received X New for 2004/05:

The percentage of appeals allowed against the authority's decision to BV 204 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 30% n/a n/a refuse on planning applications. QUALITY OF SERVICE CHECKLIST Score against a quality of service n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 70% n/a n/a BV 205 checklist. The score will reflect the quality of planning service as they stand at 31 March 2005.