Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons Southend-on-Sea vs CPA Environment High Scorers / Nearest Neighbours / Unitaries BV 106: Percentage of new homes built on previously developed land 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea 100 100 100 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Derby 51 63 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire 24.08 16.64 n/a Halton 27.48 49 n/a Hartlepool 40.8 56 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 40 36 n/a Luton 99 99.01 n/a Middlesbrough 74.3 61 n/a Nottingham 97 99 n/a Peterborough 79.24 93.66 n/a Plymouth 81.3 94.4 n/a South Gloucestershire 41 44.6 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 33 29.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 58.4 61 n/a Telford & Wrekin 54 55.35 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Brighton & Hove 99.7 100 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Portsmouth 98.6 100 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 94 93.7 n/a Unitary Median 70 65 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 41 52.3 n/a Average 66.3 68.7 n/a Source: ODPM website BV 107: Planning cost per head of population. 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea 8.24 8.68 9.45 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 7.26 7.53 n/a Bournemouth 13.95 14.43 n/a Derby 7.41 8.2 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire 12.36 12.63 n/a Halton 8.22 9.88 n/a Hartlepool 7.73 8.31 n/a Isle of Wight 14.75 15.41 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 6.86 6.7 n/a Luton 8.82 9.11 n/a Middlesbrough 5.37 5.01 n/a Nottingham 8.63 8.48 n/a Peterborough 13.46 15.45 n/a Plymouth 8.09 6.12 n/a South Gloucestershire 13.81 13.09 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 8.3 9.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 6.86 7.04 n/a Telford & Wrekin 9.52 9.69 n/a Torbay 11.17 11.25 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 7.26 7.53 n/a Bournemouth 13.95 14.43 n/a Brighton & Hove 9.91 12.28 n/a Isle of Wight 14.75 15.41 n/a Portsmouth 9.73 10.01 n/a Torbay 11.17 11.25 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 13.5 14.1 n/a Unitary Median 9.7 10 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 8.2 8.5 n/a Average 11 11.5 n/a 109a: The percentage of planning applications determined within the Governments new development control targets to determine: 60% of major applications within 13 weeks 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a 39 48 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 46 n/a Bournemouth n/a 42 n/a Derby n/a 32 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 52.7 n/a Halton n/a 57.9 n/a Hartlepool n/a 61.9 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 42.5* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 55 n/a Luton n/a 49.45 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 31.6 n/a Nottingham n/a 44 n/a Peterborough n/a 36 n/a Plymouth n/a 24 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 40 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 60 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 51.28 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 41 n/a Torbay n/a 34 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 46 n/a Bournemouth 42 n/a Brighton & Hove 21.74 n/a Isle of Wight 42.5* n/a Portsmouth 50 n/a Torbay 34 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 49.5 n/a Unitary Median 40 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 31 n/a Average 39.5 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 109b: 65% of minor applications within 8 weeks 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a 34 58 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 67 n/a Bournemouth n/a 40 n/a Derby n/a 49 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 58.3 n/a Halton n/a 80.2 n/a Hartlepool n/a 59.1 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 62* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 53 n/a Luton n/a 58 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 70.4 n/a Nottingham n/a 60 n/a Peterborough n/a 68.55 n/a Plymouth n/a 34 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 49 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 55.56 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 70.4 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 58 n/a Torbay n/a 55.78 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 67 n/a Bournemouth 40 n/a Brighton & Hove 46.76 n/a Isle of Wight 62* n/a Portsmouth 56.75 n/a Torbay 55.78 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 62 n/a Unitary Median 55.8 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 46.8 n/a Average 54.1 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 109c: 80% of other applications within 8 weeks 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a 48 71 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 78 n/a Bournemouth n/a 70 n/a Derby n/a 65 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 77.2 n/a Halton n/a 86.5 n/a Hartlepool n/a 73.03 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 77.7* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 61 n/a Luton n/a 83 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 83.9 n/a Nottingham n/a 77 n/a Peterborough n/a 88.39 n/a Plymouth n/a 46 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 74 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 64.17 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 78.89 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 73 n/a Torbay n/a 66.21 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 78 n/a Bournemouth 70 n/a Brighton & Hove 58.82 n/a Isle of Wight 77.7* n/a Portsmouth 76.95 n/a Torbay 66.21 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 78.6 n/a Unitary Median 73 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 65.3 n/a Average 71.2 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 188: The number of decisions delegated to officers as a percentage of all decisions 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a 79 88 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 82 n/a Bournemouth n/a 88 n/a Derby n/a 91 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 76.22 n/a Halton n/a 88.9 n/a Hartlepool n/a 80.77 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 89.3 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 76 n/a Luton n/a 77.71 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 58.9 n/a Nottingham n/a 85 n/a Peterborough n/a 93.18 n/a Plymouth n/a 84 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 73.89 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 88.41 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 81.29 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 85 n/a Torbay n/a 77 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 82 n/a Bournemouth 88 n/a Brighton & Hove 82.9 n/a Isle of Wight 89.3 n/a Portsmouth 91.6 n/a Torbay 77 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 88.6 n/a Unitary Median 85 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 79 n/a Average 83.1 n/a 200a: Plan making - Do you have a development plan (or alterations to it) that has been adopted in the last 5 years and the end date of which has not expired? 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a n/a NO CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Derby n/a n/a n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a n/a n/a Halton n/a n/a n/a Hartlepool n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a n/a n/a Luton n/a n/a n/a Middlesbrough n/a n/a n/a Nottingham n/a n/a n/a Peterborough n/a n/a n/a Plymouth n/a n/a n/a South Gloucestershire n/a n/a n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a n/a n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a n/a n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a n/a n/a Torbay n/a n/a n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Brighton & Hove n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Portsmouth n/a n/a n/a Torbay n/a n/a n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary Median n/a n/a n/a Unitary 25th percentile n/a n/a n/a Average n/a n/a n/a 200b: If 'No', are there proposals on deposit for an alteration or replacement, with a published timetable for adopting those alterations or the replacement plan within three years? 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a n/a NO Southend-on-Sea CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Blackpool Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth Derby n/a n/a n/a Derby East Riding of Yorkshire n/a n/a n/a East Riding of Yorkshire Halton n/a n/a n/a Halton Hartlepool n/a n/a n/a Hartlepool Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight Kingston-upon-Hull n/a n/a n/a Kingston-upon-Hull Luton n/a n/a n/a Luton Middlesbrough n/a n/a n/a Middlesbrough Nottingham n/a n/a n/a Nottingham Peterborough n/a n/a n/a Peterborough Plymouth n/a n/a n/a Plymouth South Gloucestershire n/a n/a n/a South Gloucestershire Stockton-on-Tees n/a n/a n/a Stockton-on-Tees Stoke-on-Trent n/a n/a n/a Stoke-on-Trent Telford & Wrekin n/a n/a n/a Telford & Wrekin Torbay n/a n/a n/a Torbay CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Blackpool Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth Brighton & Hove n/a n/a n/a Brighton & Hove Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight Portsmouth n/a n/a n/a Portsmouth Torbay n/a n/a n/a Torbay Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitaries Unitary 75th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary 75th percentile Unitary Median n/a n/a n/a Unitary Median Unitary 25th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary 25th percentile Average n/a n/a n/a Average 111: Percentage of applicants satisfied with the service received 2000/01 20003/04 72 63 2000/01 20003/04 77 n/a 82 n/a 74 n/a n/a n/a 81 n/a 83.7 n/a 75 n/a 86 n/a 72.2 n/a 96.1 n/a 74.94 n/a 76.45 n/a 75 n/a 79 n/a 82 n/a 84.6 n/a 78 n/a n/a n/a 2000/01 20003/04 77 n/a
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages12 Page
-
File Size-