Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons

Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons

Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons Southend-on-Sea vs CPA Environment High Scorers / Nearest Neighbours / Unitaries BV 106: Percentage of new homes built on previously developed land 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea 100 100 100 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Derby 51 63 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire 24.08 16.64 n/a Halton 27.48 49 n/a Hartlepool 40.8 56 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 40 36 n/a Luton 99 99.01 n/a Middlesbrough 74.3 61 n/a Nottingham 97 99 n/a Peterborough 79.24 93.66 n/a Plymouth 81.3 94.4 n/a South Gloucestershire 41 44.6 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 33 29.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 58.4 61 n/a Telford & Wrekin 54 55.35 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Brighton & Hove 99.7 100 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Portsmouth 98.6 100 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 94 93.7 n/a Unitary Median 70 65 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 41 52.3 n/a Average 66.3 68.7 n/a Source: ODPM website BV 107: Planning cost per head of population. 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea 8.24 8.68 9.45 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 7.26 7.53 n/a Bournemouth 13.95 14.43 n/a Derby 7.41 8.2 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire 12.36 12.63 n/a Halton 8.22 9.88 n/a Hartlepool 7.73 8.31 n/a Isle of Wight 14.75 15.41 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 6.86 6.7 n/a Luton 8.82 9.11 n/a Middlesbrough 5.37 5.01 n/a Nottingham 8.63 8.48 n/a Peterborough 13.46 15.45 n/a Plymouth 8.09 6.12 n/a South Gloucestershire 13.81 13.09 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 8.3 9.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 6.86 7.04 n/a Telford & Wrekin 9.52 9.69 n/a Torbay 11.17 11.25 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 7.26 7.53 n/a Bournemouth 13.95 14.43 n/a Brighton & Hove 9.91 12.28 n/a Isle of Wight 14.75 15.41 n/a Portsmouth 9.73 10.01 n/a Torbay 11.17 11.25 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 13.5 14.1 n/a Unitary Median 9.7 10 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 8.2 8.5 n/a Average 11 11.5 n/a 109a: The percentage of planning applications determined within the Governments new development control targets to determine: 60% of major applications within 13 weeks 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a 39 48 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 46 n/a Bournemouth n/a 42 n/a Derby n/a 32 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 52.7 n/a Halton n/a 57.9 n/a Hartlepool n/a 61.9 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 42.5* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 55 n/a Luton n/a 49.45 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 31.6 n/a Nottingham n/a 44 n/a Peterborough n/a 36 n/a Plymouth n/a 24 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 40 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 60 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 51.28 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 41 n/a Torbay n/a 34 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 46 n/a Bournemouth 42 n/a Brighton & Hove 21.74 n/a Isle of Wight 42.5* n/a Portsmouth 50 n/a Torbay 34 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 49.5 n/a Unitary Median 40 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 31 n/a Average 39.5 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 109b: 65% of minor applications within 8 weeks 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a 34 58 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 67 n/a Bournemouth n/a 40 n/a Derby n/a 49 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 58.3 n/a Halton n/a 80.2 n/a Hartlepool n/a 59.1 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 62* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 53 n/a Luton n/a 58 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 70.4 n/a Nottingham n/a 60 n/a Peterborough n/a 68.55 n/a Plymouth n/a 34 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 49 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 55.56 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 70.4 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 58 n/a Torbay n/a 55.78 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 67 n/a Bournemouth 40 n/a Brighton & Hove 46.76 n/a Isle of Wight 62* n/a Portsmouth 56.75 n/a Torbay 55.78 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 62 n/a Unitary Median 55.8 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 46.8 n/a Average 54.1 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 109c: 80% of other applications within 8 weeks 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a 48 71 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 78 n/a Bournemouth n/a 70 n/a Derby n/a 65 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 77.2 n/a Halton n/a 86.5 n/a Hartlepool n/a 73.03 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 77.7* n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 61 n/a Luton n/a 83 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 83.9 n/a Nottingham n/a 77 n/a Peterborough n/a 88.39 n/a Plymouth n/a 46 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 74 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 64.17 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 78.89 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 73 n/a Torbay n/a 66.21 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 78 n/a Bournemouth 70 n/a Brighton & Hove 58.82 n/a Isle of Wight 77.7* n/a Portsmouth 76.95 n/a Torbay 66.21 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 78.6 n/a Unitary Median 73 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 65.3 n/a Average 71.2 n/a *doubts were expressed about the arrangements for collecting the information 188: The number of decisions delegated to officers as a percentage of all decisions 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a 79 88 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a 82 n/a Bournemouth n/a 88 n/a Derby n/a 91 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a 76.22 n/a Halton n/a 88.9 n/a Hartlepool n/a 80.77 n/a Isle of Wight n/a 89.3 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a 76 n/a Luton n/a 77.71 n/a Middlesbrough n/a 58.9 n/a Nottingham n/a 85 n/a Peterborough n/a 93.18 n/a Plymouth n/a 84 n/a South Gloucestershire n/a 73.89 n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a 88.41 n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a 81.29 n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a 85 n/a Torbay n/a 77 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 82 n/a Bournemouth 88 n/a Brighton & Hove 82.9 n/a Isle of Wight 89.3 n/a Portsmouth 91.6 n/a Torbay 77 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 88.6 n/a Unitary Median 85 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 79 n/a Average 83.1 n/a 200a: Plan making - Do you have a development plan (or alterations to it) that has been adopted in the last 5 years and the end date of which has not expired? 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a n/a NO CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Derby n/a n/a n/a East Riding of Yorkshire n/a n/a n/a Halton n/a n/a n/a Hartlepool n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Kingston-upon-Hull n/a n/a n/a Luton n/a n/a n/a Middlesbrough n/a n/a n/a Nottingham n/a n/a n/a Peterborough n/a n/a n/a Plymouth n/a n/a n/a South Gloucestershire n/a n/a n/a Stockton-on-Tees n/a n/a n/a Stoke-on-Trent n/a n/a n/a Telford & Wrekin n/a n/a n/a Torbay n/a n/a n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Brighton & Hove n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Portsmouth n/a n/a n/a Torbay n/a n/a n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary Median n/a n/a n/a Unitary 25th percentile n/a n/a n/a Average n/a n/a n/a 200b: If 'No', are there proposals on deposit for an alteration or replacement, with a published timetable for adopting those alterations or the replacement plan within three years? 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea n/a n/a NO Southend-on-Sea CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Blackpool Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth Derby n/a n/a n/a Derby East Riding of Yorkshire n/a n/a n/a East Riding of Yorkshire Halton n/a n/a n/a Halton Hartlepool n/a n/a n/a Hartlepool Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight Kingston-upon-Hull n/a n/a n/a Kingston-upon-Hull Luton n/a n/a n/a Luton Middlesbrough n/a n/a n/a Middlesbrough Nottingham n/a n/a n/a Nottingham Peterborough n/a n/a n/a Peterborough Plymouth n/a n/a n/a Plymouth South Gloucestershire n/a n/a n/a South Gloucestershire Stockton-on-Tees n/a n/a n/a Stockton-on-Tees Stoke-on-Trent n/a n/a n/a Stoke-on-Trent Telford & Wrekin n/a n/a n/a Telford & Wrekin Torbay n/a n/a n/a Torbay CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group Blackpool n/a n/a n/a Blackpool Bournemouth n/a n/a n/a Bournemouth Brighton & Hove n/a n/a n/a Brighton & Hove Isle of Wight n/a n/a n/a Isle of Wight Portsmouth n/a n/a n/a Portsmouth Torbay n/a n/a n/a Torbay Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitaries Unitary 75th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary 75th percentile Unitary Median n/a n/a n/a Unitary Median Unitary 25th percentile n/a n/a n/a Unitary 25th percentile Average n/a n/a n/a Average 111: Percentage of applicants satisfied with the service received 2000/01 20003/04 72 63 2000/01 20003/04 77 n/a 82 n/a 74 n/a n/a n/a 81 n/a 83.7 n/a 75 n/a 86 n/a 72.2 n/a 96.1 n/a 74.94 n/a 76.45 n/a 75 n/a 79 n/a 82 n/a 84.6 n/a 78 n/a n/a n/a 2000/01 20003/04 77 n/a

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us