DOCSLIB.ORG

Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution 1 Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution 1 Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution Copyright and Permissions The Choices Program curriculum units and the contents of the electronic versions are copyrighted—1989-present. These copyright protections extend to all the various elements of Choices units, including titles, lesson plans, background readings, and the construction and language of the “options” or “futures” that are central to each unit. If you would like to use material from a Choices unit, in whole or in part, in your own work, please contact us at [email protected] for permission. We are usually happy to extend permission for most non-commercial educational purposes with appropriate credit given. Your purchase of a Choices unit includes permission to make copies of the student text and appropriate student handouts from the Teacher’s Resource Book for use in your own classroom. This permission does not extend to copies made for resale. NOTE: This document is NOT intended for multi-teacher use. Duplication of this document for the purpose of resale or other distribution is prohibited. Publishing, posting or providing access to this file on an intranet or other networked or web based computer system is prohibited. Please contact us at [email protected] if you are looking for an E- Text that is appropriate for distribution on a secure intranet site. Our E-Text format allows you to post individual readings, study guides, and handouts for students to complete and submit back electronically. The Choices Program is committed to providing rigorous and scholarly educational materials to teachers and classrooms. We thank you for your support. From the Choices Program www.choices.edu Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution 1 Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution WWW .CHOICES .EDU ■ WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES , BROWN UNIVERSITY ■ CHOICES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION PROGRAM ■ Acknowledgments CHOICES Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution was developed by the Choices for the 21st Century Education for the 21st Century Program with the assistance of the research staff of the Watson In- Education Program stitute for International Studies, scholars at Brown University, and January 2008 other experts in the field. We wish to thank the following scholars for their invaluable input: Director Susan Graseck Engin D. Akarli Joukowsky Family Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History and Professor of History, Brown University Curriculum Editor Andy Blackadar Ali Gheissari Professor of History, University of San Diego Curriculum Writer Sarah Kreckel Mariam Habibi Professor of History, New York University in Paris; Office Manager IB History Teacher, International School of Paris Anne Campau Prout Jo-Anne Hart Associate Professor, Lesley University; Outreach Coordinator Adjunct Associate Professor of International Studies (Research), Jillian McGuire Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University Professional Development Director Shahriar Mandanipour Former Visiting Fellow Mollie Hackett International Writers Program, Brown University Program Associate Linda B. Miller Sarah Massey Professor of Political Science, Emerita, Wellesley College; Adjunct Professor of Interna- tional Studies (Research), Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University Staff Associate Moniro Ravanipour Jessica de la Cruz Former Visting Fellow International Writers Program, Brown University Videographer/Editor Julia Liu We wish to thank Philip Benson, International Baccalaureate teacher at the American Community School in Beirut, Lebanon, and Mariam Habibi, International Baccalaureate teacher at the The Choices for the 21st Century Education Program develops International School of Paris for their assistance in developing curricula on current and historical this unit. international issues and offers workshops, institutes, and Thanks also to Kacey Dewing of St. Mary’s School in Medford, in-service programs for high Oregon for her contributions and suggestions. school teachers. Course materials place special emphasis on the All maps by Alexander Sayer Gard-Murray. importance of educating students in their participatory role as We wish to thank the Carnegie Corporation of New York for its citizens. generous support of this unit. The statements made and views The Choices for the 21st Century expressed are solely the responsibility of the Choices Program. Education Program is a program of the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution for International Studies is part of a continuing series on public policy issues. New units at Brown University. are published each academic year, and all units are updated regu- Barbara Stallings larly. Director, Watson Institute for International Studies Visit us on the World Wide Web — www.choices.edu Contents Introduction: The End of an Era 1 Part I: From Cyrus to Reza Shah 2 Early Iran 2 Islam and the Safavids 4 The Qajar Dynasty (1794-1925) 6 The Constitutional Revolution of 1906-1911 9 Reza Shah (1925-1941) Pahlavi Dynasty 12 Part II: Mossadegh to Khomeini 16 Mohammad Mossadegh and Oil Nationalization 16 Royal Dictatorship 21 The White Revolution: “Plagued by the West” 22 1979: Iranians Debate Their Future 27 Options in Brief 29 Option One: Develop a Social Democracy 30 Option Two: Build a Socialist Future 32 Option Three: The Guardianship of the Jurist 34 Epilogue: The Islamic Republic 36 Iran’s New Constitution 36 War with Iraq 39 Iran after Khomeini 42 Chronology 45 Supplementary Resources 46 THE CHOI C ES FOR T HE 21S T CEN T URY EDU C A T ION PROGRAM is a program of the Watson Institute for Inter- national Studies at Brown University. CHOI C ES was established to help citizens think constructively about foreign policy issues, to improve participatory citizenship skills, and to encourage public judgement on policy issues. The Watson Institute for International Studies was established at Brown University in 1986 to serve as a forum for students, faculty, visiting scholars, and policy practitioners who are committed to analyzing con- temporary global problems and developing initiatives to address them. © Copyright January 2008. First edition. Choices for the 21st Century Edu- cation Program. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-60123-21-4. WWW .CHOICES .EDU ■ WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES , BROWN UNIVERSITY ■ CHOICES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION PROGRAM ■ Iran Through the Looking Glass: ii History, Reform, and Revolution Iran Today Armenia Azerbaijan Uzbekistan Yerevan Baku Turkmenbashi Turkmenistan Turkey Nebitdag Charjew Gyzylarbat Van Caspian Astara Tabriz Ardebil Sea Ashgabat Lake Mary Orumiyeh Urmia Tejen Rasht Bandar-e Bojnurd Zanjan Torkeman Gorgan Mahabad Saragt Irbil Sarakhs Qazvin Sari Mashhad Shahrud Tehran Karkuk Sanandaj Eslamslahr Semnan Gushgy Hamadan Qom Herat Bakhtarun Arak Kashan Khorramabad Baghdad Ilam Iran Afghanistan Birjand Esfahan Dezful Iraq Farah Shahr-e Kord Yazd Bafq Ahvaz An Nasiriyah Al Basrah Khorrmshahr Abadan Yasuj Kerman Umm Oasr Kuwait Shiraz Zahedan Sirjan Bam Bandar-e Pakistan Saudi Arabia Bushehr Nok Kundi Bazman Iran Kangan Bandar-e Abbas International Boundary Persian Gulf Strait of Hormuz National Capital Bahrain Bandar-e Provinces Capital Lengeh Qatar Jask Railroad Doha Dubai Road Bandar Beheshti Gwadar Gulf of 0 250 Kilometers Abu Dhabi Oman 0 250 Miles no defined Muscat Arabian De Facto United Arab boundary Boundary Sea Emirates Oman A Note on Terms At the urging of scholars we have used Shi‘i to refer to one of the branches of Islam in these read- ings. Shi‘a is the plural form that refers to Shi’is collectively. ■ CHOICES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION PROGRAM ■ WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES , BROWN UNIVERSITY ■ WWW .CHOICES .EDU Iran Through the Looking Glass: History, Reform, and Revolution 1 Introduction: The End of an Era n January 16 1979, the shah [king] of Iran slogan. Fight for people’s freedom Oboarded a plane and left the country that and struggle against imperialism and he had ruled for thirty-eight years. The shah exploitation.” claimed he was going on an extended vaca- —Ayatollah Mahmoud Taleqani, Leading tion. Iran was in the midst of a revolution Shi‘i Cleric, January 18, 1979 and in truth, the shah knew his days as Iran’s monarch were over. The fact that he carried a This unity would not last. The Iranian container of Iranian soil in his pocket suggest- Revolution would quickly become more than ed that he knew he would never return. At the a fight for freedom from the shah. It would time of his departure, most Iranians saw the become the scene of ideological conflict and shah as a corrupt and repressive leader who uncertainty as Iranians struggled to define the was a puppet of the United States. future of Iran. Iranians were ready to replace the unjust The Iranian people were no strangers to and corrupt monarchy, but just what kind of political uncertainty. In the twentieth century government Iranians would choose remained alone, Iranians lived through three revolu- unsettled. While most Iranians agreed it was tions, two coups d’état, and three abdications. time for the shah to go, his departure marked Its geographic location and oil resources made the beginning of a fierce debate about Iran’s it highly desirable to Russia, Great Britain, and future. Many Iranians imagined an Iran with the United States, who wished to control and a parliamentary system and laws modeled on influence its politics. Western nations. Others hoped for a govern- As you read in the coming
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History Brief: Timeline of US-Iran Relations Until the Obama
    MIT International Review | web.mit.edu/mitir 1 of 5 HISTORY BRIEF: TIMELINE OF US‐IRAN RELATIONS UNTIL THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION Key Facts & Catalysts By Sam Sasan Shoamanesh Looking back at key events in this US‐Iran chronicle is helpful in understanding some of the traditional causes of friction and mistrust between Tehran and Washington. A reference to the annals of US‐Iran relations will also be valuable in appreciating that the policies of the past sixty years have not been advantageous to US interests and on the contrary, have resulted in blowbacks, which still vex the relations to this day. 1856: Genesis of Formal Relations | Diplomatic relations between Iran and the United States began in 1856. 1909: American Lafayette in Iran | In 1909, Howard Baskerville, an American teacher and Princeton graduate on a Presbyterian mission in Tabriz, Iran, instantly becomes an Iranian national hero where after joining the Constitutionalists during the Constitutional Revolution of 1905‐1911, loses his young life while fighting the Royalists and the forces of the Qajar king, Mohmmad Ali Shah’s elite Cossack brigade. He is remembered as saying: ʺ[t]he only difference between me and these people is my place of birth, and this is not a big difference.ʺ To this day he is revered by Iranians. Second World War | Until the second World War, the US had no interest or an active policy vis‐à‐vis Iran and relations remained cordial. 1953 C.I.A. Coup | In 1951, Prime Minister Mossadegh and his National Front party (“Jebhe Melli”), a socio‐democratic, liberal‐secular nationalist party in Iran, nationalize the country’s oil industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Triumphs and Tragedies of the Iranian Revolution
    The Road to Isolation: Triumphs and Tragedies of the Iranian Revolution Salma Schwartzman Senior Division Historical Paper Word Count: 2, 499 !1 Born of conflicting interests and influences — those ancient tensions deeply rooted in its own society — the Iranian revolution generated numerous and alternating cycles of triumph and tragedy, the one always inextricably resulting from and offsetting the other. This series of vast political shifts saw the nation shudder from a near feudal monarchy to a democratized state, before finally relapsing into an oppressive, religiously based conservatism. The Prelude: The White Revolution Dating from 1960 to 1963, the White Revolution was a period of time in Iran in which modernization, westernization, and industrialization were ambitiously promoted by the the country’s governing royalty: the Pahlavi regime. Yet although many of these changes brought material and social benefit, the country was not ready to embrace such a rapid transition from its traditional structure; thus the White Revolution sowed the seeds that would later blossom into the Iranian Revolution1. Under the reign of Reza Shah Pahlavi, the State of Iran underwent serious industrial expansion. After seizing almost complete political power for himself, the Shah set in motion the land reform law of 1962.2 This law forced landed minorities to surrender vast tracts of lands to the government so that it could be redistributed to small scale agriculturalists. The landowners who experienced losses were compensated through shares of state owned Iranian industries. Cultivators and laborers also received share holdings of Iranian industries and agricultural profits.3 This reform not only helped the agrarian community, but encouraged and supported 1 Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia.
    [Show full text]
  • HIST 6824 Modern Iran Rome 459 Professor M.A. Atkin Wednesdays
    HIST 6824 Modern Iran Rome 459 Professor M.A. Atkin Wednesdays: 5:10-7:00 Office: Phillips 340 Spring 2014 Phone: 994-6426 e-mail: [email protected] Office hours: M & W: 1:30-3:00 and and by appointment Course Description: This seminar will take a thematic approach to the period from about the year 1800 (when a state with roughly the dimensions of modern Iran emerged) to 1989 (the end of the Khomeini era.) Recurrent themes of the course include problems of state building in the context of domestic weaknesses and external pressure, ideas about reform and modernization, the impact of reform by command from above, the role of religion in politics, and major upheavals, such as the Constitutional Revolution of 1906, the oil nationalization crisis of 1951-1953, and the Islamic Revolution of 1978-1979. The specific topics and readings are listed below. The seminar meetings are structured on the basis of reading and discussion for each week’s topic. Further information on the format is in the section “Course Readings” below. In addition to the weekly reading and discussion, students are expected to write a term paper which draws on their readings for the course. The term papers are due on Monday, April 28, 2014.) Details of the paper will be provided separately. A student who already has a strong background in the history of modern Iran may prefer to focus on a research paper. Anyone who is interested in that option should inform me of that at the end of the first meeting. Early in the semester, such students should consult with me to define a suitable research project.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Iran's Foreign Relations Semira N
    Timeline of Iran's Foreign Relations Semira N. Nikou 1979 Feb. 12 – Syria was the first Arab country to recognize the revolutionary regime when President Hafez al Assad sent a telegram of congratulations to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The revolution transformed relations between Iran and Syria, which had often been hostile under the shah. Feb. 14 – Students stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, but were evicted by the deputy foreign minister and Iranian security forces. Feb. 18 – Iran cut diplomatic relations with Israel. Oct. 22 – The shah entered the United States for medical treatment. Iran demanded the shah’s return to Tehran. Nov. 4 – Students belonging to the Students Following the Imam’s Line seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. The hostage crisis lasted 444 days. On Nov. 12, Washington cut off oil imports from Iran. On Nov. 14, President Carter issued Executive Order 12170 ordering a freeze on an estimated $6 billion of Iranian assets and official bank deposits in the United States. March – Iran severed formal diplomatic ties with Egypt after it signed a peace deal with Israel. Three decades later, Egypt was still the only Arab country that did not have an embassy in Tehran. 1980 April 7 – The United States cut off diplomatic relations with Iran. April 25 – The United States attempted a rescue mission of the American hostages during Operation Eagle Claw. The mission failed due to a sandstorm and eight American servicemen were killed. Ayatollah Khomeini credited the failure to divine intervention. Sept. 22 – Iraq invaded Iran in a dispute over the Shatt al-Arab waterway.
    [Show full text]
  • Disintegration of Iranian National Front: Causes and Motives
    World Journal of Islamic History and Civilization, 2 (4): 237-245, 2012 ISSN 2225-0883 © IDOSI Publications, 2012 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wjihc.2012.2.4.2406 Disintegration of Iranian National Front: Causes and Motives 11Masoumeh Banitalebi, Kamaruzaman Yusoff and 2Zahra Khajeh Department of Political History, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia School of Language Studies and Linguistics, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia Abstract: National Front was a unique self-motivated political process whose main goal was considered as observing Iranians certain rights, manipulating free elections and preventing foreign forces from their negative influence on national benefit and interests and running regulations. This front was formed in 1949 by the leader of Dr. Mosaddeq. It was the most significant front against dictatorship and colonialism.1949 until 1979 the National Front was formed within four periods of times. The causes of National Front frustration can be accounted as weakness of organization and ideology, mistakes made by its leadership and different branches with the National Front. What were the reasons that National Front leaders could not pursue the same aim and it failed to form a coherent party? And it could not unite the political parties, unions, national communities and social groups? Why did not they learn anything from Mosaddeq’s failure and after 25 years, Bakhtiar experienced the same failure? The main purpose of this paper will be introducing the National Front’s leaders and their aims and that all these leaders followed the same route to achieve the countries benefits. Through a variety of mottos, Shah, U.S and Britain were not eager to give the National Front the power.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Revolution, Past, Present and Future
    The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Dr. Zayar Copyright © Iran Chamber Society The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Content: Chapter 1 - The Historical Background Chapter 2 - Notes on the History of Iran Chapter 3 - The Communist Party of Iran Chapter 4 - The February Revolution of 1979 Chapter 5 - The Basis of Islamic Fundamentalism Chapter 6 - The Economics of Counter-revolution Chapter 7 - Iranian Perspectives Copyright © Iran Chamber Society 2 The Iranian Revolution Past, Present and Future Chapter 1 The Historical Background Iran is one of the world’s oldest countries. Its history dates back almost 5000 years. It is situated at a strategic juncture in the Middle East region of South West Asia. Evidence of man’s presence as far back as the Lower Palaeolithic period on the Iranian plateau has been found in the Kerman Shah Valley. And time and again in the course of this long history, Iran has found itself invaded and occupied by foreign powers. Some reference to Iranian history is therefore indispensable for a proper understanding of its subsequent development. The first major civilisation in what is now Iran was that of the Elamites, who might have settled in South Western Iran as early as 3000 B.C. In 1500 B.C. Aryan tribes began migrating to Iran from the Volga River north of the Caspian Sea and from Central Asia. Eventually two major tribes of Aryans, the Persian and Medes, settled in Iran. One group settled in the North West and founded the kingdom of Media. The other group lived in South Iran in an area that the Greeks later called Persis—from which the name Persia is derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology and the Iranian Revolution1
    Ideology and the Iranian Revolution1 Mehdi Shadmehr2 First Draft: May 2008. This Draft: Summer 2011 Comments are welcomed. 1I wish to thank Bing Powell, Charles Ragin, Mehran Kamrava, Bonnie Meguid, Gretchen Helmeke, and participants in the Comparative Politics Workshop at the University of Rochester for helpful suggestions and comments. 2Department of Economics, University of Miami, Jenkins Bldg., Coral Gables, FL 33146. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Some theories of revolution deny an independent role for ideology in the making of rev- olutions, whereas others grant it an indispensable role. I investigate the role of ideology in the Iranian Revolution by focusing on two periods of Iranian history that witnessed popular uprising: the early 1960's and the late 1970's. While the former uprising was aborted, the latter led to the Iranian Revolution. Contrasting these periods, I argue that the structural and non-agency process factors underwent the same dynamic in both periods, and hence are not sufficient to explain the variation in outcome. I propose that the change in the oppo- sition's ideology accounts for this variation. To establish the causal link, I investigate this ideological change, tracing its role in the actors' decision-making processes. I argue that: (1) Khomeini's theory of Islamic state expanded the set of alternatives to the status quo theory of state, and changed the Islamic opposition's \calculus of protest"; (2) an ideological change is an intellectual innovation/shock, the timing of which is intrinsically uncertain. Therefore, integrating ideology to the theory enhances its explanatory power; (3) an ideological change can serve as an observable intermediate variable that mediates the effect of unobservable cumulative and/or threshold processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Social Reasons for Defeating Political Parties in Iran Between the Years of 1942-1954
    EVALUATION OF THE SOCIAL REASONS FOR DEFEATING POLITICAL PARTIES IN IRAN BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 1942-1954 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF Mottov of $t|iIos;opIip IN SOCIOLOGY BY Naser Haghi Ghareh Darvishlou UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Dr. Mohammad Akram DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL WORK ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (IIMOIA) 2012 -S5LM9 Political parties appeared on the scene when actions of an erstwhile political system attained a point of complexity that needed the introduction of a new political setup. Usually, political parties emerge when different classes of society become aware of their own interests, and the people of a country want the right to take part in political issues. The nineteenth century was an important phase in Iranian history, wherein political, social and economic corruption were the most obvious problem that Iranians faced. Tremendous increases of such problems have been the reason for the occurrence of all revolutions and reforms in Iran. With the allied occupation of Iran and the exile of Reza Shah, social chaos increased in the 1940s. Also, as a resuU of the Second World War, and because of the lack of a steady government, the country was led to anarchy. This problem offended Iranians more when they became aware of the degree and speed of development in the western countries. When Iranian intellectuals came into direct contact with western countries, they tried to regenerate the political structure of their own country to bring about political stability. After Reza Shah, especially between 1942 and 1954, there came a unique historical opportimity for Iranian elites to form a democratic political structure, whereas during the reign of Reza Shah, political parties and other active groups had been inactive.
    [Show full text]
  • Theorising Return Migration
    MAX WEBER PROGRAMME EUI Working Papers MWP 2011/07 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME ON THE ROLE OF STRATEGY IN NONVIOLENT REVOLUTIONARY SOCIAL CHANGE: THE CASE OF IRAN, 1977-1979 Daniel P. Ritter EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE MAX WEBER PROGRAMME On the Role of Strategy in Nonviolent Revolutionary Social Change: The Case of Iran, 1977-1979 DANIEL P. RITTER EUI Working Paper MWP 2011/07 This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper or other series, the year, and the publisher. ISSN 1830-7728 © 2011 Daniel P. Ritter Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Abstract Are revolutions made or do they come? This question is at the heart of revolution theory and has received plentiful attention from scholars. In this paper I suggest that adherence to this traditional dichotomy may not be the most useful to approach the study of revolutions. Therefore, I argue that theorists of revolutions are well advised to examine the role of the strategic decisions made by revolutionaries in their struggles against the state. Drawing empirically on the nonviolent revolution of Iran in 1977-79, I show that the strategic decisions made by the opposition movement not only allowed them to capitalize on a political opportunity, but that their strategic choices in fact helped bring that opportunity about in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Bad Times
    asef bayat REVOLUTION IN BAD TIMES ack in 2011, the Arab uprisings were celebrated as world- changing events that would re-define the spirit of our political times. The astonishing spread of these mass uprisings, fol- lowed soon after by the Occupy protests, left observers in Blittle doubt that they were witnessing an unprecedented phenomenon— ‘something totally new’, ‘open-ended’, a ‘movement without a name’; revolutions that heralded a novel path to emancipation. According to Alain Badiou, Tahrir Square and all the activities which took place there—fighting, barricading, camping, debating, cooking and caring for the wounded—constituted the ‘communism of movement’; posited as an alternative to the conventional liberal-democratic or authoritar- ian state, this was a universal concept that heralded a new way of doing politics—a true revolution. For Slavoj Žižek, only these ‘totally new’ political happenings, without hegemonic organizations, charismatic leaderships or party apparatuses, could create what he called the ‘magic of Tahrir’. For Hardt and Negri, the Arab Spring, Europe’s indignado protests and Occupy Wall Street expressed the longing of the multitude for a ‘real democracy’, a different kind of polity that might supplant the hopeless liberal variety worn threadbare by corporate capitalism. These movements, in sum, represented the ‘new global revolutions’.1 ‘New’, certainly; but what does this ‘newness’ tell us about the nature of these political upheavals? What value does it attribute to them? In fact, just as these confident appraisals were being circulated in the us and Europe, the Arab protagonists themselves were anguishing about the fate of their ‘revolutions’, lamenting the dangers of conservative restora- tion or hijacking by free-riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Khomeinism, the Islamic Revolution and Anti Americanism
    Khomeinism, the Islamic Revolution and Anti Americanism Mohammad Rezaie Yazdi A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Political Science and International Studies University of Birmingham March 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran was based and formed upon the concept of Khomeinism, the religious, political, and social ideas of Ayatullah Ruhollah Khomeini. While the Iranian revolution was carried out with the slogans of independence, freedom, and Islamic Republic, Khomeini's framework gave it a specific impetus for the unity of people, religious culture, and leadership. Khomeinism was not just an effort, on a religious basis, to alter a national system. It included and was dependent upon the projection of a clash beyond a “national” struggle, including was a clash of ideology with that associated with the United States. Analysing the Iran-US relationship over the past century and Khomeini’s interpretation of it, this thesis attempts to show how the Ayatullah projected "America" versus Iranian national freedom and religious pride.
    [Show full text]
  • Business in Iran After the Nuclear Deal
    Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Back to Business in Iran After the Nuclear Deal: Maximizing Opportunity and Minimizing Liability Risks Navigating Remaining Sanctions and Customs Controls, Obtaining Necessary Licenses, and International Tax Planning TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2015 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific Today’s faculty features: Mehrdad Ghassemieh, Partner, Harlowe & Falk, Tacoma, Wash. Nnedinma C. Ifudu Nweke, Senior Counsel, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Washington, D.C. Barbara D. Linney, Member, Miller & Chevalier Chartered, Washington, D.C. David B. Woodward, President & CEO, Associates in Cultural Exchange, Seattle The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10. Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-570-7602 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again. Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
    [Show full text]