DOCSLIB.ORG

SUMMARY REPORT HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE ASSESSMENT PT Hutan Ketapang Industri - Kabupaten Ketapang, West Kalimantan Province

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUMMARY REPORT HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE ASSESSMENT PT Hutan Ketapang Industri - Kabupaten Ketapang, West Kalimantan Province SUMMARY REPORT HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE ASSESSMENT PT Hutan Ketapang Industri - Kabupaten Ketapang, West Kalimantan Province March – December 2017 Report prepared by PT Ata Marie and PT Ekologika Consultants Plaza Bisnis Kemang, Gedung-1, Lantai-1 (108) Kemang Raya No.2, Bangka, Mampang Prapatan, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia 12730 Phone/Fax: +62 21 718 3419 Email: [email protected] COVER PAGE Title : Summary Report High Conservation Value Assessment PT Hutan Ketapang Industri, Kabupaten Ketapang, Provinsi Kalimantan Barat Report Date : October 2017 Name of Lead Assessor : Ninil Jannah Contact Information : [email protected] / [email protected] +62 21 7183419 Ekologika Consultants Plaza Bisnis Kemang, Gedung-1, Lantai-1 (No.108). Jl. Kemang Raya No.2, Bangka, Mampang Prapatan, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia 12730 Organization which Request HCV : PT. Hutan Ketapang Industri Assessment Sampoerna Strategic Square North Tower 28th Floor Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45 Jakarta Selatan 12930. Telp. 021-5771711; Fax. 021-5771712 Assessment Location Kendawangan sub-District, Ketapang District, Kalimantan Barat Province Assessment Date : March-December 2017 Assessment Area : 97.891,38 Ha (UPHHK-HTI) HCV Management Area : 37,569Ha (UPHHK-HTI) Planned Land use or Current : Rubber Plantation Landuse i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 HCV Background and Approach ................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Background ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Objectives and Outputs ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.5 Assessment Landscape .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Orangutan.................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.7 Peat Land Landscapes in and Around HKI ................................................................................................. 5 2 HCV Assessment Team ........................................................................................................................................... 9 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Assessment Process ................................................................................................................................. 10 3.2 Field Survey Method ............................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Biophysical Survey (HCV 1, HCV 2, HCV 3 and HCV 4) ............................................................................. 11 3.2.2 Social Survey (HCV 5 and HCV 6) ............................................................................................................. 12 3.2.3 Geographical Information System ........................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Stakeholder Consultations and Peer Review ........................................................................................... 12 3.4 Project Schedule ...................................................................................................................................... 13 4 Description of Physical and Social Landscape ...................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Geology, Soils, Topography and Hydrology ............................................................................................. 13 4.2 Peat Ecosystems ...................................................................................................................................... 13 4.3 Land Cover and Natural Ecosystem Types ............................................................................................... 17 4.3.1 Land Cover ............................................................................................................................................... 17 4.3.2 Natural Ecosystems Extant in the HKI concession ................................................................................... 18 4.4 Local Demography and Socio-economy .................................................................................................. 18 5 HCV Identification Results .................................................................................................................................... 19 5.1 HCV Identification Summary ................................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Explanation of HCV 1 Identification – Species Diversity .......................................................................... 20 5.3 Explanation for HCV 2 Identifcation - Landscape-level ecosystems and ecosystem mosaics, Undisturbed Forest Landscape ................................................................................................. 25 5.4 Explanation for HCV 3 Identification – Ecosystem and Habitat ............................................................... 26 5.5 Explanation for HCV 4 Identification – Ecosystem Services .................................................................... 26 5.6 Explanation for HCV 5 Identification – Community Needs ...................................................................... 27 5.7 Explanation for HCV 6 Identification – Cultural Values ........................................................................... 36 5.8 Stakeholder Consultation ........................................................................................................................ 38 6 HCV Management and Monitoring ...................................................................................................................... 42 7 Synthesis of HCV Conservation Areas and Management Areas .......................................................................... 76 8 Further Discussion................................................................................................................................................ 83 ii Table of Tables Table 1. Assessor Team ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Table 2. Assessment Schedule ........................................................................................................................... 13 Table 3. Peat Hydrological Unit areas within HKI concession ............................................................................ 14 Table 4. Land Cover in PT HKI Area .................................................................................................................... 17 Table 5. Summary of HCV Identification for PT HKI, based on HCVRN Guidance, and Sub-category definitions for Indonesia as stated at Pedoman Penilaian NKT di Indonesia .............................................................. 19 Table 6. List of HCV 1.3 Vegetation Species recorded in and around PT HKI ..................................................... 22 Table 7. List of HCV 1.3 Mammals Species recorded in and around PT HKI ....................................................... 23 Table 8. List of HCV 1.3 Bird Species recorded in and around PT HKI ................................................................ 24 Table 9. HCV 5 Identification of Kendawangan Block ........................................................................................ 28 Table 10. HCV 5 Identification of Air Hitam Block ................................................................................................ 31 Table 11. HCV 5 Summary .................................................................................................................................... 35 Table 12. Summary of Identified HCV 6 Attributes and Locations in PT HKI ........................................................ 36 Table 13. Summary of Stakeholder Consultation for PT HKI ................................................................................ 39 Table 14. Identification of Internal Threats and Management to Protect HCV in PT HKI .................................... 43 Table 15. Identification of External Threat and Management of HCV in PT HKI .................................................. 47 Table 16. Management Recommendation to Protect/Improve HCV in PT HKI .................................................... 51 Table 17. HCV Area Summary per Estate and Block (ha) ..................................................................................... 78 Table 18. HCV Management Area (in Additional to HCV Area) - Summary per Estate and Block (ha) ................ 78 Table 19. Go/No Go Calculation before Reduction for RKU Conservation Areas (ha) ......................................... 79 Table 20. Go/No Go Calculation After Reduction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pilkada 2015 and Patronage Practice Among Bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 12, No. 9; 2016 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Pilkada 2015 and Patronage Practice among Bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia Ngusmanto Ngusmanto1 1 Department of Public Administration, Tanjungpura University, West Kalimantan, Indonesia Correspondence: Ngusmanto Ngusmanto, Department of Public Administration, Tanjungpura University, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Jalan Prof. Dr. H. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat, 78124, Indonesia. Tel: 62-812-5711-773. E-mail: [email protected] Received: July 28, 2016 Accepted: August 4, 2016 Online Published: August 26, 2016 doi:10.5539/ass.v12n9p236 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n9p236 Abstract Majority studies on electoral dynamics in Indonesia are reinforce patronage as a pattern of relationships between candidates, winning team, and voters. One of winning team element which have little attention from scholars is bureaucrat. Although, normatively, bureaucrats are required to neutral in all type of general election, but in fact bureaucrats is very involved deeply in general elections. Based on empirical research in Sintang District and Ketapang District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, we found that bureaucrats have a significant role as a winning team in pilkada (direct election for local leader). Patronage is a keyword to explain political relation between bureaucrats and candidate in pilkada. This situation was triggered by the fact that there are many candidates who have social background as civil servant and, consequently, have direct access to bureaucracy. Bureaucrats have high motivation to participate in pilkada as a broker due to protecting their vested interest. In our cases, the vested interest of bureaucrat is career stability which is promising additional personal revenue and social status.
    [Show full text]
  • Rspo Notification of Proposed New Planting
    RSPO New Planting Procedure Assessment Report PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejahtera-3 – West Kalimantan ` RSPO NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED NEW PLANTING This notification shall be on RSPO website for 30 days as required by the RSPO procedures for new plantings (http://www.rspo.otg/?q=page/535). It has also been posted on local on site notice boards. Date of notification: August 12, 2016 Tick whichever is appropriate √ This is a completely new development and stakeholders may submit comments This is part of an ongoing planting and is meant for notifications only Company: Bumitama Agri, Ltd Subsidiary: PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejahtera – 3 RSPO Membership No : 1-0043-07-000-00 Location of Proposed New Planting: Kendawangan Subdistrict and Marau Subdisctrict, Ketapang District, West Kalimantan Province. GPS Reference : 2o9’46.11’’ – 2o23’0.87’’ LS - 110o25’1.47’’ – 110o38’1.67’’ BT RSPO New Planting Procedure Assessment Report PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejahtera 3 – West Kalimantan Location of the Proposed New Planting PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejehtara 3 (PT KBAS-3) a subsidiary Bumitama Agri, Ltd, is developing area approximately was 6,680 Ha based on Location Permit Number 567/PEM/2015 accordance to Head of District of Ketapang for palm oil plantation development, located at Kendawangan Subdistrict and Marau Subdistrict, Ketapang District – West Kalimantan Province. The shareholders of PT KBAS - 3 are BAL Group was 99.6% under PT Agro Manunggal Sawitindo (member of BAL) and Bumitama Gunajaya Agro was 0.4%. General company location information: Description Information
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Travel June 2013 Borneo
    N PLAYGROUNDATURE’S A place of mystery that has long nourished the imagination of naturalists and travellers alike, the island of Borneo cannot fail to captivate with its incredible array of flora and fauna, writes Nick Garbutt 66 WILD TRAVEL WILDLIFEEXTRA.COM DESTINATION BORNEO REGIONAL GUIDE ew places conjure images of darkness and mystery like the island of Borneo. Charles Darwin once described it as “one great wild untidy luxuriant hothouse made by nature for herself”, which is an incredibly apt description given the wealth and variety of fauna and flora on the island. There are mammals, lizards, snakes and frogs that ‘fly’, fish that ‘walk’ on mud, monkeys that dive and swim, plants that eat insects and flowers the size of dustbin lids. Borneo may not have the reputation and glamorous image of other top wildlife destinations around the world, but it offers the ecotourist a wealth of opportunities to experience the thrill of the island’s forests and the Fremarkable species that live there. Far left: orangutan offspring are weaned at four, sometimes later. Left: descending Mt. Kinabalu. Below: a mossy tree frog SABAH Essential Borneo WHO: SARAH WIGHT, Without question Sabah has some of the richest, visitors go to enjoy its biological riches. As DIVE WORLdwIDE WHERE: LAYANG LAYANG, most diverse and best developed parks and many as 6,000 plant species occur on the SabaH reserves in Borneo. This is not coincidence, but mountain, including over 1,000 different There are a number of rather a consequence of the towering presence of orchids and more than one third of all the world-class dive sites in Mount Kinabalu, the roof of Borneo.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia 24 September to 15 October 2013
    Indonesia 24 September to 15 October 2013 Dave D Redfield Mammal Tour Picture: Sunda Flying Lemur (Colugo) with young by Richard White Report compiled by Richard White The story: 5 islands, 22 days and 52 mammals... A journey to a land where lizards fly, squirrels are the size of mice, civets look like otters and deer are no bigger than small annoying poodles...Indonesia! Where did this all begin...? In late June I was thinking of heading to Asia for a break. After yet another Tasmanian winter I wanted to sweat, get soaked in a tropical rain shower, get hammered by mosquitoes...I wanted to eat food with my hands (and not get stared at), wear sandals, drink cheap beer...and of course experience an amazing diversity of life. While researching some options I contacted my former employer and good friend Adam Riley from Rockjumper Birding Tours/Indri and he suggested I touch base with a client that I had arranged trips for before. The client (and now friend!) in question, Dave Redfield, has seen an aPD]LQJYDULHW\RIWKHZRUOG¶VPDPPDO species but, at that time, had yet to visit Indonesia. So, armed with a target list and a 22 day budget, I sat down and began researching and designing a tour in search of a select suit of mammal species for Dave. Time, terrain, concentration of species and cost were considered. We settled on a few days in mammal hotspots on Java, Sumatra, Borneo, Sulawesi and finally Bali, in that order. %DOLZDVDOVRFKRVHQDVDJRRGSODFHWRZLQGGRZQDIWHUµURXJKLQJLW¶ though the rest of Indonesia. It is also worth mentioning that Dave, realising that seeing all the ZRUOG¶Vmammals in the wild is an impossible target, does count mammals seen in captivity; the target list of species was thus not what one might have expected (for example, a Red Spiny Mouse was a priority but Babirusa was not).
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Fuels 34 Gas/Hybrid Engines 38
    PETROMIN MA RINE Singapore www.petrominonline.com 2020 MAR – aPR & OFFSH ORE AlTERNATIVE FUEls foR GREEN SHIPPIng ToUGH OUTlooK FOR REGIONAL POWERHOUSE P12 EUROPE DomINATES LNG IMPORT STORY IN 2019 P30 Mar – A PR 2020 VOL. 2 NO.02 VOL. Singapore • China • India • Myanmar • Thailand • Japan • Vietnam • Malaysia • Korea • Australia • Germany Your custom solution provider Range of products include: • Accommodation Systems • Electrical Systems • Deck Machinery • Propulsion Systems • Ballast Water Management Systems • Pumps • Cranes • Compressors • LNG/Scrubber Systems • Loading Computer • System Rudder We are able to source the right products with the right specifications with the right quality, at the right cost. Red Offshore Industries Pte Ltd Email: [email protected] Website: www.red-offshore.com CONTENTS The global pandemic has led With IMO resolute on reducing REGULAR to a supply glut and massive the shipping industry’s footprint FOCUS drop in oil prices. The following on the environment, decarbon- article highlights the major ization is one of the main focus ar- 03 Editorial consequences. eas. This article provides some of the options available to shipown- 04 Updates 30 Market News ers to aid them in their journey IMCA ramps up its presence Europe Dominates LNG Import towards zero-carbon. Story in 2019 06 Industry News 38 WinGD Advances Clean 44 Calendar of Events Fuel Research with Flexible 12 Regional Feature Injector Concept Tough Outlook For Regional As the marine and offshore Powerhouse industry move towards greener IN DEPTH operations there is a need 18 Project News for engines which can be 34 Pathways to operated with greener fuel. 26 Novel Coronavirus Decarbonization - This article provides an update Wreaks Havoc on the Oil Simplifying New Fuel on technology which assists & Gas Industry Choices for Shipowners this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Galéopithèque De Temminck
    Galeopterus variegatus | ASSOCIATION RIMBA http://rimba-ecoproject.com/les-mammiferes/espece-20/ GALÉOPITHÈQUE DE TEMMINCK Galeopterus variegatus (Audebert, 1799) Fiche n°20 Date de la 1ère observation : 18/03/2016 Lieux d’observation : Rimba (baie de Muaro Duo) - Sumatra Ouest - Indonésie MAMMIFERE TERRESTRE Méthodes d’identification : Visuel, photos. Famille des Cynocéphalidés (colugos) NOMS Nom commun international : Sunda Flying Lemur, Malayan Flying Lemur, Sunda Colugo, Cobego. STATUTS Synonymes : Lémur volant Sundanais, Lémur volant de Malaisie, Colugo. Statut IUCN : Préoccupation mineure (2008) CITES-2017 : Non évalué Informations complémentaires : DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE Population en diminution, protégé par la législation nationale dans tous les Asie du Sud-Est pays natifs. Cambodge, Vietnam, Laos, Est Myanmar, Sud Thaïlande, Indonésie (Sumatra, Kalimantan & Java ouest), Malaisie (péninsule & Bornéo), Singapour, Brunei. CLASSIFICATION EMBRANCHEMENT Chordata HABITAT SOUS-EMBRANCHEMENT Vertebrata CLASSE Mammalia Strictement arboricoles et passent leur vie entière dans les arbres des forêts tropicales humides. Ils peuvent ORDRE Dermoptera également être trouvés dans les hautes terres jusqu’à FAMILLE Cynocephalidae 1000 m d’altitude et peuvent facilement s'adapter aux GENRE Galeopterus forêts perturbées et aux plantations. Ils sont principalement nocturnes. ESPECE variegatus ASSOCIATION RIMBA | Association Loi 1901 | Siret 788 604 718 00015 | [email protected] 1 Galeopterus variegatus | ASSOCIATION RIMBA http://rimba-ecoproject.com/les-mammiferes/espece-20/ DESCRIPTION A PROPOS DE CETTE FICHE Taille : 50-69 cm (tête-queue) Statut : Confirmée Poids : 0,9-2 kg Date de publication : 20/02/2017 Clé d'identification : Habituellement gris, avec de larges Dernière modification : - marques noires et blanches leur donnant un aspect de Numéro de référence : 20 lichen qui contribue au camouflage.
    [Show full text]
  • Riots – Communal Violence
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IDN30556 Country: Indonesia Date: 15 September 2006 Keywords: IDN30556 – Indonesia – Tangerang – Riots – Communal violence This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Please advise the location of Pontianak and Tangerang. 2. Please advise if there is any reference to riots, looting, etc. in Tangerang in June 1999, December 2003 and November 2004. 3. Are there further references to looting or rioting in Tangerang on other occasions since 1995? 4. Please provide information about ethnic and/or racial tensions in this area, and also in Indonesia generally. RESPONSE 1. Please advise me of the location of Pontianak and Tangerang. Pontianak is located in the province of West Kalimantan and is the provincial capital (‘Maps and Geographic information – Indonesia’ January 2004, United Nations website http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/indonesi.pdf#search=%22map%20of%20 indonesia%22 – Accessed 12 September – Attachment 1). Tangerang is a large city located about 20km west of the national capital Jakarta. It is in the province of Banten in West Java1 (‘Tangerang’ (undated), Wikipedia website http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangerang – Accessed 12 September 2006 – Attachment 2). 1 Users should be aware that Wikipedia is a Web-based free-content encylopaedia which is written collaboratively by volunteers. The Research Service recommends that users of Wikipedia familiarise themselves with the regulatory practices which Wikipedia employs as a preventative measure against vandalism, bias and inaccuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Forest Reduction in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X (printed edition) Volume 11, Number 1, January 2010 ISSN: 2085-4722 (electronic) Pages: 46-54 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d110110 Characterizing forest reduction in Ketapang district, West Kalimantan, Indonesia ASEP SUNJAYA ADHIKERANA1, JITO SUGARDJITO2,♥ 1Fauna and Flora International – Indonesia Programme, Jl. Harsono, R.M. No.1, Ragunan, Jakarta 12550, Indonesia 2Research Centre for Biology, The Indonesia Institute for Sciences, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km. 46, Cibinong-Bogor 16911, West Java, Indonesia, Tel.: +62-21-8765056 Fax.: +62-21-8765068, ♥e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 16 November 2009. Revision accepted: 29 December 2009. ABSTRACT Adhikerana AS, Sugardjito J (2010) Characterizing forest reduction in Ketapang district, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 11: 46-54. We have characterized deforestation in the Ketapang district forests when we implemented the Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) Conservation in Trans-boundary Landscape between Central and West Kalimantan provinces. For the purpose of evaluating the changes in land use and land cover in the study areas, a series of Landsat imageries have been analyzed. Each of the Landsat imagery data set for all study areas was initially classified using unsupervised classification into 13 different land-cover types. Ground truth checks were undertaken for Ketapang district forests and Sungai Puteri peat swamp forest, from which the results were used for the supervised land use classification of these two study areas. Between 1992 and 2000 there was only small conversion of primary forest into secondary forests. During this period barren land remained extensive about 30.17% of the total area of Ketapang district. Both agriculture and plantation areas substantially increased 56% and 55% respectively during 2003, while at the same time the extent of both primary and peat swamp forests were considerably reduced up to 15% and 28% respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Community Under the Soekarno Era in Indonesia
    Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 31(1), 2021 Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 31(1), 2021, pp. 104-110 P-ISSN: 0854-0039, E-ISSN: 2407-5825 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v31i1.23986 Chinese Community under the Soekarno Era in Indonesia Septian Aji Permana1, Ari Retno Purwatiningsih2 1 Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, [email protected] 2 Universitas Terbuka Article history Abstract: is study aims to analyze the life of Chinese people in Indonesia during the Soe- Received : 2020-04-10 karno government and analyze the government’s treatment of Chinese people in the Soekar- Accepted : 2021-03-20 no era. is study used a historical method approach with a limited history across the 1930s Published : 2021-03-31 period, from 1941 to 1958, from 1959 to 1966. e method used is as follows: data collection in the form of literature studies relevant to the subject matter discussed, source criticism to Keywords find out the relevant elements through the incorporation of information obtained through Chinese community the source, and compilation i.e., writing historical facts. Political and economic perceptions Soekarno Era influenced Chinese ethnic communities in Indonesia during colonial, the old order, and the Culture new times. Chinese society received many sanctions from the Soekarno government because Policy of communist ideology, which was a threat to the government. e existence of ethnocentric during the old order so that Chinese people cannot be received well. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kehidupan masyarakat Tionghoa di Indonesia pada masa pemerintahan Soekarno dan menganalisis perlakuan pemerintah ter- hadap orang Tionghoa pada masa pemerintahan Soekarno.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Potential Economic in Undeveloped Regency Through Maritime Infrastructure
    UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IN UNDEVELOPED REGENCY THROUGH MARITIME INFRASTRUCTURE (CASE STUDY: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING OF NORTH KAYONG REGENCY) Imanuddin ABDULGANI, [email protected], Gadjah Mada University ABSTRACT The North Kayong Regency is one of the new Regency in West Kalimantan Province that is still lack of infrastructure development such as infrastructure and public amenities. The purpose of this research is to contribute in regional development planning policy through determine appropriate method in maritime infrastructure for increasing regional economic growth. Our study shows that the best practice to improve the development planning process is improve better and appropriate policies that might be apply through the new methods on practice oriented, focus on strategies, tools and manage the utilization of planning and resources. By maintain strategies, develop solution that integrates different dimension of regional planning and resources in every conceivable way to solve the problem and to overcome the obstacles. Keyword : Economic Growth, Maritime Infrastructure, Interconnectivity, Regional Development Planning, Undeveloped Regency INTRODUCTION The Maritime Infrastructure and its benefit for Development can not be implemented optimally, since there is regulation that the use of maritime infrastructure must follow the order of the Ministry of Transportation and Provincial Agency for Transportation which supplemented by the Provincial Spatial Plan (RTRW). The challenge is that the maritime infrastructure is not always coincident with the administrative area so as to allow synergies between agencies can not run harmoniously and produce no real technical action. For example, making a grand design of a regional sea port development can have a different direction of environmental function with a land allocation which is arranged in the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Conservation Act 2010
    LAWS OF MALAYSIA ONLINE VERSION OF UPDATED TEXT OF REPRINT Act 716 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 2010 As at 1 October 2014 2 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 2010 Date of Royal Assent … … 21 October 2010 Date of publication in the Gazette … … … 4 November 2010 Latest amendment made by P.U.(A)108/2014 which came into operation on ... ... ... ... … … … … 18 April 2014 3 LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 716 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and commencement 2. Application 3. Interpretation PART II APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS, ETC. 4. Appointment of officers, etc. 5. Delegation of powers 6. Power of Minister to give directions 7. Power of the Director General to issue orders 8. Carrying and use of arms PART III LICENSING PROVISIONS Chapter 1 Requirement for licence, etc. 9. Requirement for licence 4 Laws of Malaysia ACT 716 Section 10. Requirement for permit 11. Requirement for special permit Chapter 2 Application for licence, etc. 12. Application for licence, etc. 13. Additional information or document 14. Grant of licence, etc. 15. Power to impose additional conditions and to vary or revoke conditions 16. Validity of licence, etc. 17. Carrying or displaying licence, etc. 18. Change of particulars 19. Loss of licence, etc. 20. Replacement of licence, etc. 21. Assignment of licence, etc. 22. Return of licence, etc., upon expiry 23. Suspension or revocation of licence, etc. 24. Licence, etc., to be void 25. Appeals Chapter 3 Miscellaneous 26. Hunting by means of shooting 27. No licence during close season 28. Prerequisites to operate zoo, etc. 29. Prohibition of possessing, etc., snares 30.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genome 10K Project: a Way Forward
    The Genome 10K Project: A Way Forward Klaus-Peter Koepfli,1 Benedict Paten,2 the Genome 10K Community of Scientists,Ã and Stephen J. O’Brien1,3 1Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; email: [email protected] 2Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064 3Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33004 Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2015. 3:57–111 Keywords The Annual Review of Animal Biosciences is online mammal, amphibian, reptile, bird, fish, genome at animal.annualreviews.org This article’sdoi: Abstract 10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900 The Genome 10K Project was established in 2009 by a consortium of Copyright © 2015 by Annual Reviews. biologists and genome scientists determined to facilitate the sequencing All rights reserved and analysis of the complete genomes of10,000vertebratespecies.Since Access provided by Rockefeller University on 01/10/18. For personal use only. ÃContributing authors and affiliations are listed then the number of selected and initiated species has risen from ∼26 Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2015.3:57-111. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org at the end of the article. An unabridged list of G10KCOS is available at the Genome 10K website: to 277 sequenced or ongoing with funding, an approximately tenfold http://genome10k.org. increase in five years. Here we summarize the advances and commit- ments that have occurred by mid-2014 and outline the achievements and present challenges of reaching the 10,000-species goal. We summarize the status of known vertebrate genome projects, recommend standards for pronouncing a genome as sequenced or completed, and provide our present and futurevision of the landscape of Genome 10K.
    [Show full text]