Centre for Transportation Engineering and Planning SURVEY of ALBERTA's TRUCKING INDUSTRY with a VIEW to IMPROVING ALBERTA's
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ECY Running Map:Layout 1.Qxd
Pathways from the Eau Claire YMCA GOING EAST 13. EDWORTHY PARK LOOP (15.1 km): Head west on the South side of the river beyond the CPR Rail 1. LANGEVIN LOOP (3.5 km): Go East on the South side of the river, past Centre Street underpass. way Crossing at Edworthy Park. Cross Edworthy Bridge to the North side of the river and head East. Cross over at the Langevin Bridge and head West. Return via Prince’s Island Bridge. Return to the South side via Prince’s Island Bridge. 2. SHORT ZOO (6.1 km): Go East on the South side of the river past Langevin Bridge to St George’s 14. SHOULDICE BRIDGE (20.4 km): Cross Prince’s Island Bridge to the North side of the river and head Island footbridge. Cross to the North side via Baines Bridge. Return on the North side heading West West to Shouldice Bridge at Bowness Road. Return the same way heading East. via Prince’s Island Bridge. 15. BOWNESS PARK via BOW CRESCENT (32.4 km): Follow North side of river going West from 3. LONG ZOO (7.6 km): Go East on the South side of the river over 9th Avenue Bridge. Travel through Prince’s Island to Bowness Road. Cross over Shouldice Bridge. Follow Bow Crescent, 70th Street, and the zoo to Baines Bridge. Return heading west on the North side of the river, crossing back via 48th Avenue to Bowness Park. Make loop of paved road (West) and return to YMCA same way. pathway around zoo and returning through Prince’s Island. -
Macleod Trail Corridor Study TT2015-0183 Information Brochure ATTACHMENT 2
Macleod Trail Corridor Study TT2015-0183 Information Brochure ATTACHMENT 2 MACLEOD TRAIL CORRIDOR STUDY A balanced approach to transportation planning 2015-0626 calgary.ca | contact 311 Onward/ Providing more travel choices helps to improve overall mobility in Calgary’s transportation system. TT2015-0183 Macleod Trail Corridor Study - Att 2.pdf Page 1 of 12 ISC: Unrestricted Macleod Trail Corridor Study Information Brochure 100 YEARS OF MACLEOD TRAIL: PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE Photo of Macleod Trail circa 1970. The City of Calgary, Corporate Records, Archives. Photo of Macleod Trail circa 2005. The City of Calgary, Corporate Records, Archives. Macleod Trail, as we know it today, has remained much the same since the 1960’s. It was, and continues to be, characterized by low-rise buildings accompanied by paved parking lots and poor infrastructure for pedestrians. The development of low-density land use and long distances between destinations or areas of interest has encouraged driving as the primary way for people to get to and from key destinations along Macleod Trail. What will Macleod Trail look like Because people will be living within walking or cycling distances to businesses and major activity centres over the next 50 years? (e.g. shopping centres), there will be a need for quality Many of the older buildings along Macleod Trail are sidewalks, bikeways, and green spaces that help enhance approaching the end of their lifecycle. Now is an safety of road users and improve the overall streetscape. opportune time to put in place conditions that will help guide a different type of land use and development along PEOPLE WILL HAVE ACCESS TO SAFE, Macleod Trail for the next 50 years. -
Stand Alone Office Building for Lease 431 - 58Th Avenue Se, Calgary, Ab
STAND ALONE OFFICE BUILDING FOR LEASE 431 - 58TH AVENUE SE, CALGARY, AB N 4 Street SE P P 58 Avenue SE Dining Major Public Transit Services Thoroughfares Accessibility Petro Canada Subway 58th Avenue SE Serviced by Bus Wholesale Foods Tim Hortons Blackfoot Trail Routes: 66, 72, 73 TD Canada Trust Wendy’s Macleod Trail Oriental Phoenix RBC Royal Bank Gaucho 7-Eleven Alexi Olcheski, Principal Paul McKay, Vice President Eric Demaere, Associate 403.232.4332 587.293.3365 587.293.3366 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] © 2018 Avison Young Real Estate Alberta Inc. All rights reserved. E. & O.E.: The information contained herein was obtained from sources which we deem reliable and, while thought to be correct, is not guaranteed by Avison Young. 431 - 58TH AVENUE SE, CALGARY, AB Particulars estled on 58th Avenue SE between the major Available Space: 5,048 SF (Demisable) Nthouroughfares of Blackfoot Trail and Macleod Trail, this rare stand alone office space is a one-of-a Demising A. 1,528 SF kind opportunity for various tenants. Whether the Options: B. 2,099 SF use is medical or business, this space is guaranteed to be the perfect location to build and expand your C. 2,949 SF business. Within a 3 km radius, the 2017 daytime D. 3,520 SF population was 58,467, with 24,000 vehicles per day (VPD) on 58th Avenue SE and 57,000 VPD on Rental Rates: Market Blackfoot Trail SE. Op. Costs: $12.76 PSF (2018 est.) Zoning: I-G (Industrial-General) Occupancy: 30 days Term: 5 - 10 years Highlights - Located on the southwest corner of 58th Avenue and 4th Street SE - Minutes away from Chinook Centre, Calgary’s largest enclosed mall (1.2M GLA) - 23 surface parking stalls at the rear of the property - High quality interior finishes - Features include showers, washing machine, and dryer Alexi Olcheski, Principal Paul McKay, Vice President Eric Demaere, Associate 403.232.4332 587.293.3365 587.293.3366 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] © 2018 Avison Young Real Estate Alberta Inc. -
Southern Arizona Future Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report
I-11 I-11 I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor Study & Southern Arizona Future INTERMOUNTAIN WEST CORRIDOR STUDY Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report Prepared for and July 2014 I-11 AND INTERMOUNTAIN WEST CORRIDOR STUDY Southern Arizona Future Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report Prepared for Nevada Department of Transportation and Arizona Department of Transportation July 2014 Prepared by and . DISCLAIMER The contents of this planning document are based on information available to the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Nevada Department of Transportation (herein referred to as the Sponsoring Agencies) as of the date of this report. Accordingly, this report may be subject to change. The Sponsoring Agencies’ acceptance of this report as evidence of fulfillment of the objectives of this planning study does not constitute endorsement/approval of any recommended improvements nor does it constitute approval of their location and design or a commitment to fund any such improvements. Additional project‐level environmental impact assessments and/or studies of alternatives will be necessary. The Sponsoring Agencies do not warrant the use of this report, or any information contained in this report, for use or consideration by any third party. Nor do the Sponsoring Agencies accept any liability arising out of reliance by a third party on this report, or any information contained in this report. Any use or reliance by third parties is at their own risk. iv Contents 1. Introduction and Overview ........................................................................1 2. Corridor Context ........................................................................................5 3. Existing and Future Conditions Overview .................................................. 11 4. Evaluation Framework and Alternatives Development .............................. 17 5. Alternatives Evaluation Summary and Results .......................................... 21 6. -
Leasing Opportunity 88% Occupied 1000 Sf
LEASING OPPORTUNITY 88% OCCUPIED 1,000 S.F. — 2,800 S.F. OF MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE AVAILABLE 1 2 OVERVIEW D&P Commercial Group is a private real estate investor, developer, owner, and manager that specializes in destination medical facilities. Founded by physicians, we understand the unique requirements of our tenants (healthcare providers) and their patrons (patients). An experienced team and network of trusted partners ensures that global trends are combined with local needs to create sustainable properties that make lasting contributions to the overall health and wellness of people and communities. From inception to operation, D&P Commercial Group’s goal for each project remains steadfast: provide tenants (healthcare providers) the best opportunity to run successful practices and give every patron (patient) the optimal environment for healing. With this in mind, novel concepts and high-quality materials are used to build state-of-the-art destination medical facilities with iconic architecture, modern design, cutting-edge technology, environmentally-friendly features, and efficient flow. In addition, we take great pride in strategic planning, meticulous attention to detail, and timely execution before and during construction as well as proactive and responsible management after completion. Meadows Mile Professional Building—the first in a series of projects by D&P Commercial Group—is located in the thriving southeast quadrant of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Brilliantly situated along a major thoroughfare and in close proximity to a unique blend of residential, retail, and industrial areas, this site has high visibility and easy accessibility. With visually stunning and fully integrated spaces, Meadows Mile Professional Building is the true confluence of form and function, enabling a positive and seamless experience for tenants (healthcare providers) and patrons (patients) alike. -
I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017
CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County -
1. Purpose and Need
1. Purpose and Need 1.1 Proposed Action The proposed project involves traffic improvements to United States Highway 93 (U.S. 93) in the Boulder City, Nevada, area. The project limits are between a western boundary at the end of Interstate 515 (I-515) on U.S. 93/United States Highway 95 (U.S. 95) in Henderson (U.S. 95 Milepost [MP] 59.10), approximately 1.6 kilometers (km) (1 mile) north of the Railroad Pass Hotel and Casino, and an eastern boundary on U.S. 93, approximately 1.2 km (0.75 miles) east of the Hacienda Hotel and Casino. The eastern boundary is coincident with the planned western end of the U.S. 93 Hoover Dam Bypass project Nevada Interchange (see Section 2.1). The Boulder City/U.S. 93 Corridor Study covers a total distance of approximately 16.7 km (10.4 miles) on the present route of U.S. 93 (Figure 1-1). U.S. 93 is the major commercial corridor for interstate and international commerce, and it is the single route through Boulder City, functioning as a principal urban arterial. It is a direct north-south link between Phoenix and Las Vegas, which are two of the fastest-growing areas in the United States (U.S.), and it carries a high volume of east-west traffic from Interstate 40 (I-40) to Las Vegas and to Interstate 15 (I-15). U.S. 93, in combination with other highways, creates a continuous Canada to Mexico (CANAMEX) corridor through the U.S. between Calgary, Alberta, and Nogales, Sonora (Figure 1-2). -
Notice of Hearing
Notice of Hearing Proceeding ID No. 234 South Calgary 69-kV Transmission Upgrade Application No. 1604960 Alberta Electric System Operator Needs Identification Document Application Application No. 1604977 AltaLink Management Ltd. Facility Application – Alter Transmission Line 832L Application No. 1604978 ENMAX Power Corporation Facility Application – Phase 1 Application No. 1606127 ENMAX Power Corporation Facility Application – Phase 2 Application No. 1606901 ENMAX Power Corporation Facility Application – Phase 3 The Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or the Commission) is a quasi-judicial regulatory body responsible for making decisions about utility-related applications, such as building transmission lines, substations and power plants. The AUC is also responsible for making decisions about the need for some transmission system developments, including the need for new or rebuilt transmission lines and substations. Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) Application No. 1604960 - Needs identification document (NID) The AESO, responsible for planning electric facility development in Alberta, applied to the AUC for approval of the need for new transmission development in the areas identified in the maps attached. This NID application (or needs application) deals with the need to upgrade the south Calgary 69-kilovolt (kV) transmission system to a 138-kV transmission system (the project). The NID does not include the siting and construction of the facilities. In Application No. 1604960, the AESO states that there is a need to upgrade the south Calgary 69-kV transmission system which extends from ENMAX No. 28 substation located at the corner of Glenmore Trail and Sarcee Trail in the southwest quadrant of Calgary to ENMAX No. 23 - 2 - substation located at 49 Avenue and 24 Street in the southeast quadrant of Calgary. -
RENTAL MARKET REPORT Calgary CMA
HOUSING MARKET INFORMATION RENTAL MARKET REPORT Calgary CMA CANADA MORTGAGE AND HOUSING CORPORATION Date Released: 2020 The overall vacancy rate*... !Northwest UNCHANGED at ( Below CMA (!Northeast % Similar to CMA 3.9 Above CMA !North Hill Downtown ( Southwest (! (! (!Beltline * The average rent is ... (!Chinook (!Other Centres Below CMA (!Southeast $1,181 Similar to ProvinceCMA Above ProvinceCMA Fish Creek UP by 1.7% (! PRIMARY RENTAL MARKET (by bedroom type) Bachelor One bedroom Two bedroom Three or more bedrooms “The vacancy rate was % % % % unchanged in Calgary as additions to the rental 2.5 3.5 4.3 4.8 universe were offset by Vacancy Rate Vacancy Rate Vacancy Rate Vacancy Rate strong rental demand.” $ Avg. $ Avg. $ Avg. $ Avg. 899 Rent 1,080 Rent 1,305 Rent 1,255 Rent Heather Bowyer Senior Analyst *CMHC collects data on the primary and secondary rental market annually, in the fall. These data refer to the primary rental market, which only includes rental units in privately-initiated apartment structures containing at least three rental units. The secondary rental market covers rental dwellings that were not originally purpose-built for the rental market, including rental condominiums. The primary vacancy rate and rent level is based on all surveyed structures, while the rent increase is based only on structures common to the survey sample in both the current and previous year. Rental Market Report - Calgary CMA - Date Released - 2020 Highlights Figure 1 The apartment vacancy rate in the Calgary CMA was 3.9%, unchanged Apartment vacancy rate unchanged from October 2018. Vacancy rate (%) Oct-18 Oct-19 7.0 The average apartment rent was $1,181 in October 2019 compared 6.0 to $1,149 last year. -
NAFTA Superhighway Order Encourages the Privatization of Taxpayer-Funded Corridor As the Trunk of a Tree, One That Hooks U.S
—————— 1992 —————— If you look at the map over there, I think it is NAFTA [Ed note: While EO#12803 does not mention “super- self-evident what it means to the whole country, highways,” a brief description is included because this not just to Texas. And if you look at the NAFTA Superhighway Order encourages the privatization of taxpayer-funded corridor as the trunk of a tree, one that hooks U.S. assets, including roads designated as a part of up Mexico and all those markets down there with Memory Hole the international superhighway/supercorridor system.] the industrial heartland of our country, as well as A review of NAFTA Superhighway history Executive Order #12803: the most important economic centers in Canada. reveals that the marketing of this concept “Infrastructure Privatization” I urge this committee to give careful consid- began well over a decade ago. In that time, eration to this concept. As this trade grows, the Signed by President George H.W. Bush on a growing number of highways have been current I–35 won't be able to handle it. It will de- April 30, 1992, EO#12803 encourages designated as “high priority corridors”— a teriorate. We won't take advantage of all the privatization of U.S. infrastructure assets that are rating that allows easier access to federal funds. imaginative opportunities that this superhighway “financed in whole or in part by the Federal Lobbyist seeking to create an designation can give us. (p.687) Government and needed for the functioning international infrastructure have referred The designation of I–35 corridor as a super- of the economy.” The Order defines privatization to the U.S. -
I-15 Critical Corridor Plan
I-15 Critical Corridor Plan October 4, 2018 Jacobs One Nevada Transportation Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 I-15 Critical Corridor Plan .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Limitations of this Corridor Plan ................................................................................... 2 1.2 Corridor Description and Segments .......................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Segment A—California/Nevada State Line to I-15/I-215 ............................................. 2 1.2.2 Segment B—Core Area of Las Vegas ............................................................................ 2 1.2.3 Segment C—I-15/I-515/US 95 to I-15/CC-215 ............................................................. 2 1.2.1 Segment D—I-15/CC-215 to AZ/NV State Line ............................................................. 2 2 I-15 Background .........................................................................................................................4 2.1 Corridor Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 National Context .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Regional Connectivity .................................................................................................. -
FINAL Feasibility Report / Prepared for ADOT
FINAL FEASIBILITY REPORT / PREPARED FOR ADOT I-40/US 93 WEST KINGMAN TI Final Feasibility Report ADOT Project No. 040 M0 48 H732301L FEDERAL PROJECT NO. NH-040-A(AVJ) Topock-Kingman Highway I-40 October 2009 Prepared By Final Feasibility Report l-AÛlUS 93 West K¡ngman Tl ADOT PROJECT NO. O4O MO 48 H732301L FEDERAL PROJECT NO. NH-040-A (AVJ) TOPOCK - KINGMAN HIGHWAY t-40 Prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation October 2009 I-40/US 93 West Kingman TI Feasibility Report Executive Summary Background This study for the I-40/US 93 West Kingman TI, ADOT Project Number 040 MO 48 H732301L, identifies possible corridor alternatives for a new system-to-system directional interchange connecting Interstate 40 (I-40) to United States Route 93 (US 93) near Kingman, AZ. The general location for the various alternative corridors is along I-40 between the Shinarump Drive traffic interchange (TI) and Stockton Hill Road TI (approximate MP 44 to MP 52) and along US 93 between the State Route (SR) 68 TI, near the Kingman Port of Entry, and the existing Beale Street interchange, where US 93 connects with I-40 (approximate MP 67 to MP 71). US 93 is part of the CANAMEX Corridor. The Beale Street interchange between I-40 and US 93 is the third of three “bottleneck” locations along US 93 identified from the previous CANAMEX Corridor study. The first location is Hoover Dam and that area is being addressed with the Hoover Dam Bypass construction. The second location is Wickenburg and that area is being addressed with an interim bypass that began construction in February 2008.