DOCSLIB.ORG

I-15 Critical Corridor Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I-15 Critical Corridor Plan I-15 Critical Corridor Plan October 4, 2018 Jacobs One Nevada Transportation Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 I-15 Critical Corridor Plan .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Limitations of this Corridor Plan ................................................................................... 2 1.2 Corridor Description and Segments .......................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Segment A—California/Nevada State Line to I-15/I-215 ............................................. 2 1.2.2 Segment B—Core Area of Las Vegas ............................................................................ 2 1.2.3 Segment C—I-15/I-515/US 95 to I-15/CC-215 ............................................................. 2 1.2.1 Segment D—I-15/CC-215 to AZ/NV State Line ............................................................. 2 2 I-15 Background .........................................................................................................................4 2.1 Corridor Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 National Context .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Regional Connectivity ................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Freight Movement ........................................................................................................ 6 2.1.4 Recreation and Tourism ............................................................................................... 6 2.1.5 Multimodal Uses .......................................................................................................... 6 2.1.6 Land Management and Jurisdictions ............................................................................ 7 2.2 Previous Planning Study Recommendations ............................................................................. 7 2.2.1 I-15 Mobility Alliance (Ongoing) ................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 NDOT Automated/Connected Vehicle Policy Framework (Ongoing)........................... 8 2.2.3 RTC On Board (Ongoing) .............................................................................................. 8 2.2.4 NDOT I-15 Tropicana Interchange & Hacienda-Harmon HOV Ramps (Ongoing) ......... 8 2.2.5 NDOT Nevada State Freight Plan (2017) ...................................................................... 8 2.2.6 NDOT Proposed Las Vegas Stadium Traffic Assessment (2016)................................... 9 2.2.7 RTC Transportation Investment Business Plan (2015) ................................................. 9 2.2.8 RTC Southern Nevada Regional Goods Movement Master Plan (2015) .................... 10 2.2.9 NDOT Southern Nevada High-Occupancy Vehicle Plan (2015) .................................. 10 2.2.10 NDOT Apex to Mesquite and Moapa Valley Corridor Study (2011) ........................... 10 2.3 I-15 Improvement Projects ...................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Completed Projects .................................................................................................... 11 2.3.2 Planned/Programmed Projects .................................................................................. 11 3 Existing and Future Conditions .................................................................................................. 14 3.1 Corridor Performance ............................................................................................................. 14 3.1.1 Enhance Safety ........................................................................................................... 14 3.1.2 Preserve Infrastructure .............................................................................................. 16 3.1.3 Optimize Mobility ....................................................................................................... 19 3.1.4 Transform Economies ................................................................................................. 24 i One Nevada Transportation Plan 3.1.5 Foster Sustainability ................................................................................................... 25 3.1.6 Connect Communities ................................................................................................ 28 3.2 Overall Opportunities and Constraints.................................................................................... 29 4 Project Identification ................................................................................................................ 32 4.1 Planned and Programmed Projects ......................................................................................... 32 4.1.1 Construction Projects (Immediate) ............................................................................ 32 4.1.2 Near-Term Projects (0 to 5 Years) .............................................................................. 33 4.1.3 Mid-Term Projects 5 to 10 Years) ............................................................................... 33 4.1.4 Long-Term Projects (10 to 20+ Years) ........................................................................ 33 4.2 Additional Needs ..................................................................................................................... 35 4.2.1 Identified through Data Deficiencies.......................................................................... 35 4.2.2 Identified through Qualitative Analysis ...................................................................... 35 4.2.3 Prior Study Recommendations ................................................................................... 35 References ....................................................................................................................................... 38 Tables Table 1. Performance Measure Alignment with Goals, Data, and Targets ................................................... 1 Table 2. I-15 Corridor Programmed Improvements ................................................................................... 12 Table 3. Fatal Crash Rates per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled on I-15 ................................................ 14 Table 4. Bridge Sufficiency Rating Scale ...................................................................................................... 16 Table 5. Mobility Ratings............................................................................................................................. 19 Table 6. Access to Economic Generators Rating Scale ............................................................................... 25 Table 7. Access to Alternative Fuels Rating Scale ....................................................................................... 26 Table 8. Access to Alternative Modes Rating Scale .................................................................................... 29 Table 9. I-15 Corridor Performance – Key Takeaways ................................................................................ 29 Figures Figure 1. Study Area Segments ..................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. I-15 Context Map ........................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3. Southern Nevada HOV Plan Recommendations .......................................................................... 11 Figure 4. Fatal Crash Rating by Segment and Crash Locations on I-15 ....................................................... 15 Figure 5. I-15 Bridge Locations .................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 6. I-15 Pavement Condition ............................................................................................................. 18 Figure 7. I-15 Travel Speed vs. Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................... 19 Figure 8. I-15 Travel Time Reliability, Chokepoints ..................................................................................... 20 Figure 9. Conceptual Categorization of Access Control .............................................................................. 21 ii One Nevada Transportation Plan Figure 10. Truck Parking Facilities on I-15 .................................................................................................. 23 Figure 11. Economic Centers along the I-15 Corridor ................................................................................. 24 Figure 12. Electric Charging Stations in Southern Nevada (FHWA) ............................................................ 27 Figure 13. Aesthetic Features at I-15/Cactus Interchange ......................................................................... 28 Figure 14. Project Development Process .................................................................................................... 32 Figure 15. I-15 Planned and Programmed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area
    Functional Classification Update Report For the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area Functional Classification Update Report Introduction The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 required the use of functional highway classification to update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems by July 1, 1976. This legislative requirement is still effective today. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification system recognizes that streets cannot be treated as independent, but rather they are intertwined and should be considered as a whole. Each street has a specific purpose or function. This function can be characterized by the level of access to surrounding properties and the length of the trip on that specific roadway. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system for urban areas is divided into urban principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials include interstates, expressways, and principal arterials. Eligibility for Federal Highway Administration funding and to provide design standards and access criteria are two important reasons to classify roadway. The region is served by Interstate 15 (north/South) and Interstate 86 (east/west). While classified within the arterial class, they are designated federally and do not change locally. Interstates will be shown in the functional classification map, but they will not be specifically addressed in this report. Functional Classification Update The Idaho Transportation Department has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine the functional usage of the existing roads and streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate
    New 9+/-Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate 15 & Dale Evans Parkway Apple Valley, CA Freeway Location Traffic Counts in Excess of 66,000VPD 1 Acre Pads Available, For Sale, Ground Lease or Build-to-Suit Highlights Gateway to Apple Valley Freeway Exposure / Frontage to I-15 in excess of 66,000 VPD Off/On Ramp Location. Located in highly sought after freeway ramp location on I-15 in high desert corridor Interstate I-15 heavily Traveled with Over 2 Million Vehicles Per Month Located 20 Miles South of Barstow/Lenwood, 10 Miles North of Victorville Located in Area with High Demand for Gas, Food and Lodging Conveniently Located Midway Between Southern California and Las Vegas, Nevada Adam Farmer P. (951) 696-2727 Xpresswest Bullet Train from Victorville to Las Vegas plans to Cell. (951) 764-3744 build station across freeway. www.xpresswest.com [email protected] 26856 Adams Ave Suite 200 Murrieta, CA 92562 This information is compiled from data that we believe to be correct but, no liability is assumed by this company as to accuracy of such data Area / I-15 Gateway To Apple Valley Site consists of a 9 acre development at the North East Corner of Dale Evans Parkway and Interstate 15 located in Apple Valley. Site offers freeway frontage, on/off ramp position strategically to capture all traffic traveling on the I-15. Development will offer 9 pad sites available for gas, food, multi tenant and lodging. Interstate 15 runs North and South with traffic counts in excess of 66,000 ADT. Pads will be available for sale, ground lease or build-to-suit.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Arizona Future Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report
    I-11 I-11 I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor Study & Southern Arizona Future INTERMOUNTAIN WEST CORRIDOR STUDY Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report Prepared for and July 2014 I-11 AND INTERMOUNTAIN WEST CORRIDOR STUDY Southern Arizona Future Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report Prepared for Nevada Department of Transportation and Arizona Department of Transportation July 2014 Prepared by and . DISCLAIMER The contents of this planning document are based on information available to the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Nevada Department of Transportation (herein referred to as the Sponsoring Agencies) as of the date of this report. Accordingly, this report may be subject to change. The Sponsoring Agencies’ acceptance of this report as evidence of fulfillment of the objectives of this planning study does not constitute endorsement/approval of any recommended improvements nor does it constitute approval of their location and design or a commitment to fund any such improvements. Additional project‐level environmental impact assessments and/or studies of alternatives will be necessary. The Sponsoring Agencies do not warrant the use of this report, or any information contained in this report, for use or consideration by any third party. Nor do the Sponsoring Agencies accept any liability arising out of reliance by a third party on this report, or any information contained in this report. Any use or reliance by third parties is at their own risk. iv Contents 1. Introduction and Overview ........................................................................1 2. Corridor Context ........................................................................................5 3. Existing and Future Conditions Overview .................................................. 11 4. Evaluation Framework and Alternatives Development .............................. 17 5. Alternatives Evaluation Summary and Results .......................................... 21 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Final I-15 IRP Phase III Report
    Transportation Housing Economy I-15 Interregional Partnership I-15 Phase III Final Report Interregional Partnership February 2010 I-15 IRP JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP The primary goal of the I-15 Interregional Partnership (IRP) Joint Policy Committee is to review and provide policy input on Phase III of the I-15 IRP Project. The two regions seek to collaborate on mutually beneficial housing, transportation, and economic planning to improve the quality of life for the region’s residents through the identification and implementation of short-, medium-, and long-range policy strategies. The committee will meet three times during the duration of Phase III at dates and times to be mutually determined. Staff contacts: Jane Clough-Riquelme, SANDAG (619) 699-1909; [email protected] Kevin Viera, WRCOG (951) 955-8305; [email protected] MEMBERS Scott Mann (alt.) Councilmember, City of Menifee San Diego Association of Governments WRCOG Executive Committee (SANDAG) Sam Abed Riverside County Transportation Commission Councilmember, City of Escondido (RCTC) SANDAG Borders Committee Rick Gibbs Councilmember, City of Murrieta Dave Allan RCTC Commissioner Councilmember, City of La Mesa SANDAG Borders Committee Ron Roberts Mayor Pro Tem, City of Temecula Crystal Crawford RCTC Commissioner Mayor, City of Del Mar Jeff Stone (alt.) Patricia McCoy (alt.) Supervisor, Riverside County Councilmember, City of Imperial Beach RCTC Commissioner Chair, SANDAG Borders Committee Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Western Riverside Council of Government (WRCOG) Jeff Comerchero Councilmember, City of Temecula Thomas Buckley Chair, RTA Board of Directors Councilmember, City of Lake Elsinore WRCOG Executive Committee Bob Buster Supervisor, Riverside County Chuck Washington First Vice Chair, RTA Board of Directors Councilmember, City of Temecula WRCOG Executive Committee AGENCY EXECUTIVES Scott Farman (alt.) Mayor, City of Wildomar SANDAG Gary L.
    [Show full text]
  • I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017
    CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County
    [Show full text]
  • Mid City's I-15 Stretch to Open After Torturous 40-Year Saga San Diego Union-Tribune - Sunday, January 9, 2000 Author: Jeanne F
    A neighborhood's rough road: Mid city's I-15 stretch to open after torturous 40-year saga San Diego Union-Tribune - Sunday, January 9, 2000 Author: Jeanne F. Brooks They called it "Nightmare on 40th Street" -- a 2.2-mile example of urban life gone very wrong. By day, it was a corridor of weeds and broken bottles, abandoned houses, graffiti, exhaust fumes and rumbling, horn-blowing, radio-blasting, tire-squealing traffic. Endless traffic. At night, when the creatures of the dark came out -- prostitutes, drug dealers, gangbangers -- things got worse. From behind their locked doors, honest residents of the San Diego neighborhood of City Heights could hear gunfire in the no man's land along 40th Street. From time to time, they saw empty houses go up in flames. And nearly every night, they listened to the clatter of police helicopters, which some took to calling the City Heights Air Force. In the mornings, residents picked used condoms and needles out of their lawns, and they cursed the name of the entity they saw as their afflicter -- Caltrans. The problem was a freeway the California Department of Transportation wasn't building through the middle of the neighborhood. By the late 1980s, the long relationship between the state agency and the community of City Heights had grown deeply dysfunctional. Few then would have predicted the coming of a day such as this Friday, when Caltrans employees and community activists likely will shake hands and congratulate one another -- on the same side, in the end. Their common bond: the grand opening of the final segment of Interstate 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 15 Lane Restrictions and Detour for Wide Loads BRIDGE REPAIR PROJECT - VIRGIN RIVER GORGE
    Interstate 15 Lane Restrictions and Detour for Wide Loads BRIDGE REPAIR PROJECT - VIRGIN RIVER GORGE PANACA CEDAR ITY CRYSTAL PRINGS UTAH NEVADA ST. ORGE BEAVER M ARIZONA LEGEND Pr ea Detour MAP NOT TO SCALE LAS EGAS 19-077 Due to the terrain within the Virgin River Gorge and the narrow TRAVEL ALERT width of I-15, crews must reduce the width of the travel lanes during Restrictions on wide loads and lane closures construction to 10 feet, which prohibits the passage of vehicles wider than 10 feet through the construction zone. Crews will also move are scheduled on Interstate 15 in northwestern traffic over to one side of the highway while working on the other, Arizona. Motorists traveling on Interstate 15 providing one lane in each direction. These restrictions will begin this between Mesquite, Nevada, and St. George, Utah, April and are scheduled to remain in place through spring 2020. should plan ahead for delays in both directions This $6.4 million project will rehabilitate three bridge decks on through the Virgin River Gorge. Vehicles wider I-15 and is scheduled for completion in summer 2020. For more than 10 feet should prepare for an extended 224- information, please visit the project website at azdot.gov/I-15Bridges. mile detour. Drivers should proceed through the work zone with caution, slow down and watch for construction personnel and equipment. Schedules are subject to change based on weather and other CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS unforeseen factors. The Arizona Department of Transportation advises drivers to allow extra travel time and plan for the following continuous, around- CONTACT the-clock restrictions beginning in early April 2019 and continuing through spring 2020 as crews complete bridge work on I-15 through For more information, please call the ADOT Bilingual Project the Virgin River Gorge: Information Line at 855.712.8530 or go to azdot.gov/contact and select Projects from the drop-down menu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interstate Highway System Turns 60
    The Interstate Highway System turns 60: Challenges to Its Ability to Continue to Save Lives, Time and Money JUNE 27, 2016 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP ® of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization that researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues. TRIP is sponsored by insurance companies, equipment manufacturers, distributors and suppliers; businesses involved in highway and transit engineering and construction; labor unions; and organizations concerned with efficient and safe surface transportation. Executive Summary Sixty years ago the nation embarked on its greatest public works project, the construction of the Interstate Highway System. President Dwight D. Eisenhower provided strong support for the building of an Interstate Highway System that would improve traffic safety, reduce travel times and improve the nation’s economic productivity. Serving as the most critical transportation link in the nation’s economy, the Interstate Highway System has significantly improved the lives of U.S. residents and visitors. Throughout the nation, the Interstate system allows for high levels of mobility by greatly reducing travel times and providing a significantly higher level of traffic safety than other routes. But 60 years after President Eisenhower articulated a vision for the nation’s transportation system, the U. S. again faces a challenge in modernizing its aging and increasingly congested Interstate highway system. If Americans are to continue to enjoy their current level of personal and commercial mobility on Interstate highways and bridges, the nation will need to make a commitment to identifying a long-term funding source to support a well-maintained Interstate Highway System able to meet the nation’s need for additional mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Purpose and Need
    1. Purpose and Need 1.1 Proposed Action The proposed project involves traffic improvements to United States Highway 93 (U.S. 93) in the Boulder City, Nevada, area. The project limits are between a western boundary at the end of Interstate 515 (I-515) on U.S. 93/United States Highway 95 (U.S. 95) in Henderson (U.S. 95 Milepost [MP] 59.10), approximately 1.6 kilometers (km) (1 mile) north of the Railroad Pass Hotel and Casino, and an eastern boundary on U.S. 93, approximately 1.2 km (0.75 miles) east of the Hacienda Hotel and Casino. The eastern boundary is coincident with the planned western end of the U.S. 93 Hoover Dam Bypass project Nevada Interchange (see Section 2.1). The Boulder City/U.S. 93 Corridor Study covers a total distance of approximately 16.7 km (10.4 miles) on the present route of U.S. 93 (Figure 1-1). U.S. 93 is the major commercial corridor for interstate and international commerce, and it is the single route through Boulder City, functioning as a principal urban arterial. It is a direct north-south link between Phoenix and Las Vegas, which are two of the fastest-growing areas in the United States (U.S.), and it carries a high volume of east-west traffic from Interstate 40 (I-40) to Las Vegas and to Interstate 15 (I-15). U.S. 93, in combination with other highways, creates a continuous Canada to Mexico (CANAMEX) corridor through the U.S. between Calgary, Alberta, and Nogales, Sonora (Figure 1-2).
    [Show full text]
  • I-15 Freight Corridor Improvement Project TCEP Factsheet
    Fact Sheet: Interstate 15 Corridor Freight Improvement Project: Auxiliary Lanes and Express Lanes Partnership Application for TCEP 2020: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority & Caltrans Contact: Paula Beauchamp, SBCTA Director of Project Delivery, (909)884-8276, [email protected] Project Location: San Bernardino and Riverside Counties Project Scope: The Interstate 15 (I-15) Corridor Freight Improvement Project: Auxiliary Lanes and Express Lanes is a collaborative effort by SBCTA, RCTC and Caltrans to improve traffic efficiency, operations, and safety at a nationally-significant freight bottleneck. The segment extends from Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road in Riverside County to Foothill Boulevard in San Bernardino County, with the I-15/I-10 interchange in the mid-section, a critical bottleneck for freight. This section of I-15 crosses two major east-west freight corridors, State Route 60 and I-10. Auxiliary lanes will be added in three strategic locations to increase throughput for trucks and enhance traffic operations and safety. Also included are express lanes in the median of I-15 (where there are no current HOV lanes), matching the express lanes currently under construction in Riverside County. Collaboration has been ongoing and continues with RCTC to develop and fund a project that complements the RCTC I-15 express lanes and aims to provide a consistent, seamless service for the traveling public. Project Cost: Total Project Cost - $307,167,000 TCEP Request: $87,000,000, consisting of $52,200,000 Regional share and $34,800,000 State share Project Schedule: PA&ED: R/W: PS&E/RTL: Begin CON: End CON: 12/20/18 04/17/23 05/15/23 11/01/23 05/28/27 Why Is the I-15 Auxiliary Lane and Express Lane Project a Critical Freight Improvement Project? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Memorandum Representative Photo
    4101 Yellowstone AvenueCAPIT |AL Chubbuck, MARKETS NET Idaho LEASE PROPERTY 83202 GROUP OFFERING MEMORANDUM REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO TABLE OF CONTENTS Primary Contact DON ZEBE Executive Summary.....................................3 Senior Vice President +1 208 403 1973 [email protected] Property Description....................................8 CBC Advisors 2043 East Center Street Market Overview.......................................10 Pocatello, ID 83201 THE OFFERING CBC Advisors is pleased to extend the opportunity Founded in 1972, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is the largest privately-owned arts-and- to acquire fee simple interest in a 55,000-square crafts retailer with more than 800 stores across the nation. Hobby Lobby offers more foot Hobby Lobby. The lease has a below market than 70,000 arts, crafts, hobbies, home decor, Holiday, and seasonal products. The rent, three 5-year renewal options, and strong company has had strong growth with 63 new stores, which includes 12 relocated rental increases throughout. The asset is located stores during 2017. Hobby Lobby plans to continue its expansion by adding 60 new in Chubbuck, Idaho (Bannock County), which locations and hiring 2,500 new employees in 2018. The Hobby Lobby is included in is in the southeastern portion of Idaho, at the Forbes’ annual list of America’s largest private companies and had December 2016 convergence of Interstate 15 and 86. sales exceeding $4.3 billion. Hobby Lobby is ideally situated as an anchor on the south end of Pine Ridge Mall. Pine Ridge Mall is a 646,000-square foot enclosed mall also anchored by C-A-L Ranch, JCPenney, Herberger’s, and Shopko. Since acquisition in 2013, ownership has invested approximately $28 million in improvements and additions to the mall.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 15/Limonite Avenue Interchange Improvements Project
    Interstate 15/Limonite Avenue Interchange Improvements Project CITIES OF EASTVALE AND JURUPA VALLEY RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT 08 – RIV – 15 (PM 46.7/49.7) EA 0E150 PN 0800020201 Initial Study [with Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration] Prepared by the State of California Department of Transportation and in cooperation with the County of Riverside and the Cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley July 2015 This page intentionally left blank. General Information about This Document What’s in this document: The California Department of Transportation (Department), with cooperation from the County of Riverside and the cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley, has prepared this Initial Study (IS), which examines the potential environmental impacts of the alternatives being considered for the proposed project located in Riverside County, California. The proposed project would improve the existing freeway interchange at Interstate 15 (I-15) and Limonite Avenue. The Department is the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The document tells you why the project is being proposed, what alternatives we have considered for the project, how the existing environment could be affected by the project, the potential impacts of the alternatives, and the proposed avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures. What you should do: • Please read the document. • Additional copies of the document are available for review at: Riverside County Transportation Department (3525 14th Street, Riverside 92501), Eastvale Library (7447 Scholar Way, Eastvale 92880), and Glen Avon Library (9244 Galena Street, Jurupa Valley 92509) • This document may be downloaded at the following website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist8/I- 15 Limonite.htm.
    [Show full text]