DOCSLIB.ORG

Travel in London, Report 3 I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Travel in London, Report 3 I Transport for London Transport for London for Transport Travel in London Report 3 Travel in London Report 3 MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London ©Transport for London 2010 All rights reserved. Reproduction permitted for research, private study and internal circulation within an organisation. Extracts may be reproduced provided the source is acknowledged. Disclaimer This publication is intended to provide accurate information. However, TfL and the authors accept no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions or for any damage or loss arising from use of the information provided. Overview .......................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 27 1.1 Travel in London report 3 ............................................................................ 27 1.2 The Mayor of London’s transport strategy .................................................. 27 1.3 The monitoring regime for the Mayor’s Transport Strategy ......................... 28 1.4 The MTS Strategic Outcome Indicators ....................................................... 28 1.5 Treatment of MTS Strategic Outcome Indicators in this report ................... 31 1.6 Relationship to other Transport for London (TfL) and Greater London Authority (GLA) Group publications ............................................................ 32 1.7 Contents of this report ............................................................................... 33 1.8 Further information ..................................................................................... 34 2. Travel demand and mode shares ..................................................... 35 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 35 2.2 Review of long-term trends in travel in London ........................................... 35 2.3 Recent developments - 2009 ...................................................................... 35 2.4 Trips in London ........................................................................................... 37 2.5 Journey stages in London ........................................................................... 39 2.6 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: travel demand in London....................... 41 2.7 Mode shares ............................................................................................... 42 2.8 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: mode shares ......................................... 44 2.9 Trends in travel by public transport - TfL operated services ........................ 45 2.10 Trends in travel by public transport - National Rail in London ..................... 49 2.11 Road traffic in London................................................................................. 50 2.12 Travel by bicycle in London ......................................................................... 55 2.13 Focus on: travel to central London in the weekday morning peak ............... 58 3. Travel by Londoners and key trends in freight, water transport and taxis .............................................................................................. 63 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 63 3.2 Key features and trends .............................................................................. 63 3.3 Travel by Londoners: TfL’s LTDS survey ..................................................... 64 3.4 Focus on: car ownership and travel behaviour ............................................. 69 3.5 Freight in London ........................................................................................ 72 3.6 Focus on: developing London’s waterways ................................................. 76 3.7 Licensed taxis and private hire .................................................................... 80 4. Supporting economic development and population growth: the performance of the transport networks ........................................ 83 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 83 4.2 Key features and trends .............................................................................. 83 4.3 Performance of London’s road network ...................................................... 86 4.4 Traffic speeds and vehicle delay .................................................................. 87 Travel in London, Report 3 i 4.5 Journey time reliability ................................................................................ 91 4.6 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: journey time reliability for motor vehicles ....................................................................................................... 94 4.7 Focus on: delay and disruption on the road network ................................... 95 4.8 Focus on: congestion hot-spots in London ............................................... 100 4.9 Performance of the public transport networks - summary ........................ 104 4.10 Performance of the London Underground (LU) ......................................... 105 4.11 Performance of London Buses .................................................................. 109 4.12 Performance of DLR and London Tramlink ................................................ 111 4.13 Performance of National Rail including London Overground ..................... 113 4.14 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: public transport reliability .................... 114 4.15 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: public transport capacity ..................... 115 4.16 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: satisfaction with levels of crowding on the principal public transport modes ......................................................... 117 4.17 Operating costs for TfL public transport services per passenger kilometre 118 4.18 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: operating costs for TfL services per passenger kilometre for the principal public transport modes ................... 120 4.19 Asset condition - TfL services................................................................... 120 4.20 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: asset condition for TfL services .......... 123 5. Supporting economic development and population growth: London’s population and economy .............................................. 125 5.1 Introduction and content .......................................................................... 125 5.2 Key features and trends ............................................................................ 125 5.3 London’s population - developments between 2008 and 2009 and review of long-term trends................................................................................... 126 5.4 London’s wider interactions ...................................................................... 129 5.5 Recent trends in employment in London .................................................. 132 5.6 Economic output - Gross Value Added ..................................................... 133 5.7 The economy - a key travel demand driver ................................................ 135 5.8 Travel demand and the recession .............................................................. 138 5.9 Travel demand - bus and Underground ..................................................... 138 5.10 Travel demand - road traffic ...................................................................... 142 5.11 Travel demand - rail .................................................................................. 144 5.12 Accessibility to jobs .................................................................................. 145 5.13 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: people’s access to jobs. ...................... 145 5.14 Securing and measuring the transport legacy of the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games for London .................................................................. 146 6. Safety and security on the transport system .............................. 151 6.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 151 6.2 Key features and trends ............................................................................ 151 6.3 Road safety ............................................................................................... 152 6.4 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: road traffic casualties .......................... 155 6.5 Passenger safety on the public transport networks ................................... 156 ii Travel in London, Report 3 6.6 Crime and anti-social behaviour on the public transport networks ............ 157 6.7 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: crime on the principal public transport modes ...................................................................................................... 159 6.8 Perception of crime .................................................................................. 160 6.9 MTS Strategic Outcome Indicator: perception of crime/safety .................. 160 7. Transport and climate change ....................................................... 161 7.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 161 7.2 Key features and trends - including update for 2009 ................................. 161 7.3 Basic source apportionment for London’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inner and South London Rail and Tube Alternatives Key To
    Alternative Routes from Carshalton Beeches When services are severely disrupted, we will arrange for your ticket to be accepted as indicated below to get you to your destination. Rail replacement buses may be arranged in certain cases. Please listen to announcements for further information about this. To: Suggested routes: Ashtead Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre, bus 470 to Epsom then South West Trains Balham Bus 154 from outside station to West Croydon station then Southern train, OR bus 154 from opposite station to Morden station then Northern line Banstead Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre then bus S1 or 420 to Banstead High Street Belmont Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre then bus S1, S4, 80, 280 or 420 Boxhill & Westhumble Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre, bus 470 to Epsom then South West Trains Cheam Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre then bus 470 Clapham Junction Bus 154 from outside station to West Croydon station then Southern train, OR bus 154 from opposite station to Morden station, Northern line to Clapham Common then bus 35 or 37 Crystal Palace Bus 154 from outside station to West Croydon station then Southern train Dorking Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre, bus 470 to Epsom then South West Trains Epsom Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre then bus 470 Epsom Downs Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre, bus S1 or 420 to Banstead High Street then bus 166 Ewell East Bus 154 from opposite station to Sutton centre then bus 470 Gipsy
    [Show full text]
  • The London Congestion Charge
    Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 20, Number 4—Fall 2006—Pages 157–176 The London Congestion Charge Jonathan Leape y the 1990s, the average speed of trips across London was below that at the beginning of the twentieth century—before the car was introduced (New- B bery, 1990, p. 35). Traffic speeds in central London had fallen more than 20 percent since the 1960s, from an average 12.7 mph for the morning peak period in 1968 (and a high of 14.2 mph in 1975) to 10 mph in 1998. Even in the larger area of inner London, drivers in 1998 spent almost 30 percent of their time stationary during peak periods and more than half their time traveling at speeds of less than 10 mph (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998). By 2002, the all-day average travel speed in central London was just 8.6 mph (14.3 km/hour), compared to an uncongested (night-time or “free flow”) average speed of around 20 mph (32 km/hour). Congestion, measured in terms of minutes of delay per mile compared to uncongested conditions, averaged 3.7 minutes/mile (2.3 min/km) (Transport for London, 2003a, p. 11). With more than one million people entering central London between 7:00 and 10:00 a.m. on an average workday, and more than one-quarter of those by road, the cost of congestion was clearly considerable. Public concern over levels of traffic congestion was high. An independent survey in 1999 identified public transport and congestion as the two most “impor- tant problems requiring action”—selected by 46 and 33 percent of London resi- dents, respectively, compared to 20 percent for crime or law and order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Operator's Story Appendix
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into Reliability of the Jubilee Line
    Investigation into Reliability: London Underground Jubilee Line An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science By Jack Arnis Agolli Marianna Bailey Errando Berwin Jayapurna Yiannis Kaparos Date: 26 April 2017 Report Submitted to: Malcolm Dobell CPC Project Services Professors Rosenstock and Hall-Phillips Worcester Polytechnic Institute This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. Abstract Metro systems are often faced with reliability issues; specifically pertaining to safety, accessibility, train punctuality, and stopping accuracy. The project goal was to assess the reliability of the London Underground’s Jubilee Line and the systems implemented during the Jubilee Line extension. The team achieved this by interviewing train drivers and Transport for London employees, surveying passengers, validating the stopping accuracy of the trains, measuring dwell times, observing accessibility and passenger behavior on platforms with Platform Edge Doors, and overall train performance patterns. ii Acknowledgements We would currently like to thank everyone who helped us complete this project. Specifically we would like to thank our sponsor Malcolm Dobell for his encouragement, expert advice, and enthusiasm throughout the course of the project. We would also like to thank our contacts at CPC Project Services, Gareth Davies and Mehmet Narin, for their constant support, advice, and resources provided during the project.
    [Show full text]
  • INT0028 Brochure Update V4.1.Pdf
    change your view. Interchange can provide high quality office space from 4,263 to 18,500 sq ft. Time for a change. your change style. Interchange features prominently on the Croydon skyline, occupying an exciting position within the continuing transformation of Croydon town centre. Best in class office accommodation providing an excellent working environment with over 150,000 sq ft let to internationally renowned global brands. Croydon continues to change, exceeding all expectations and Interchange is situated at the heart of it. interchange croydon interchange croydon Croydon Town Centre offers the best of both worlds: a wide variety of independent stores alongside established retail and leisure operators. Trading since 1236, Surrey Street Market is Thanks to a £5.25bn regeneration programme, the economic the oldest known street market in the UK. heartland of south London will soon become a thriving must-visit Croydon Council is committing £500,000 for destination not just within the UK, but in Europe. a programme of improvements to the market At the heart of these transformative plans will be a £1.5bn retail including improved lighting and paving. and leisure complex by The Croydon Partnership. Source: Develop Croydon Source: Develop Croydon 8 9 interchange croydon interchange croydon Based on the concept of a pop-up mall, BOXPARK Croydon fuses local and global brands together side by side to create a unique shopping and modern street food destination. BOXPARK Croydon regularly hosts numerous events spanning grime raves to orchestras, baby discos to drum & bass workouts, regular jazz, poetry and open mic nights and a whole manor of events in between.
    [Show full text]
  • Informing You Every Stop of the Way
    London Buses iBus Informing you every stop of the way MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London London Buses London Buses informing you every stop of the way The most important priority for London Buses is to provide the best possible bus service for its 6.3 million daily bus passengers. By introducing a £117m state-of-the-art Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) technology system and comprehensive telecommunications across London, millions of bus passengers are soon to benefit from a more reliable, consistent bus service and will have access to real time passenger information (RTPI) at bus stops, on board buses and from SMS text messaging. With an 8000-strong and increasing bus fleet, Try the new bus travelling London Buses’ existing radio communications experience systems can no longer cope. iBus - one of the largest projects of its kind in the world - will Imagine having real time bus service revolutionise how services are delivered and information at your fingertips. A typical monitored. bus journey could be like this: A wealth of journey time data will be available You receive an up to the minute SMS text to analyse and improve on, and three of the message on your mobile as you walk out of same number buses arriving at once at a bus your house. As you arrive at the bus stop you stop will be a thing of the past, as every bus can confirm on the Countdown display that will be tracked and monitored ensuring an your bus will arrive in an accurately predicted efficient service on all routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Accidents and the London Congestion Charge
    Economics Working Paper Series 2014/015 Traffic Accidents and the London Congestion Charge Colin P. Green, John. S. Heywood and Maria Navarro The Department of Economics Lancaster University Management School Lancaster LA1 4YX UK © Authors All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission, provided that full acknowledgement is given. LUMS home page: http://www.lums.lancs.ac.uk/ Traffic Accidents and the London Congestion Charge Colin P. Green1, John. S. Heywood2,1 and Maria Navarro1 1Lancaster University 2 University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Abstract In a rare effort to internalize congestion costs, London recently instituted charges for traveling by car to the central city during peak hours. Although the theoretical influence on the number and severity of traffic accidents is ambiguous, we show that the policy generated a substantial reduction in both accidents and fatalities in the charged area and hours. At the same time, the spatial, temporal and vehicle specific nature of the charge may cause unintended substitutions as traffic and accidents shift to other proximate areas, times and to uncharged vehicles. We demonstrate that, to the contrary, the congestion charge reduced accidents and fatalities in adjacent areas, times and for uncharged vehicles. These results are consistent with the government's objective to use the congestion charge to more broadly promote public transport and change driving habits. JEL Codes: I18, R48, H27 Keywords: Traffic Congestion; Pricing; Vehicle Accidents The authors thank the Melvin Lurie Memorial Fund at UWM which allowed Heywood and Navarro to work together in the fall of 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime on Public Transport March 2016
    Police and Crime Committee Crime on public transport March 2016 ©Greater London Authority March 2016 Police and Crime Committee Members Joanne McCartney (Chair) Labour Jenny Jones (Deputy Chair) Green Caroline Pidgeon MBE (Deputy Chair) Liberal Democrat Tony Arbour Conservative Jennette Arnold OBE Labour Kemi Badenoch Conservative Andrew Dismore Labour Len Duvall Labour Roger Evans Conservative Role of the Police and Crime Committee The Police and Crime Committee examines the work of the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and reviews the Police and Crime Plan for London. The Committee can also investigate anything that it considers to be of importance to policing and crime reduction in Greater London and make recommendations for improvements. Contact Janette Roker, Scrutiny Manager Email: [email protected] Contact: 020 7983 6562 For media enquiries: Mary Dolan, External Relations Email: [email protected] Contact: 020 7983 4603 2 Contents Chair’s foreword ................................................................................................. 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 8 2. Types of crime committed on public transport .......................................... 9 3. Tackling crime and anti-social behaviour on public transport ................. 13 4. Policing the 24 hour city ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inner and Outer London
    Autumn 2011 Briefing Inner and outer London: a tale of two cities? Outer London is important to the future success of the wider city; 60% of Londoners live there and 40% Policy implications of the London’s jobs are there. It is the location of • Suburbia may not be fashionable but it is key infrastructure for London and the nation. Outer often successful and adaptable; ‘people like London cannot be considered in isolation from the living there’. centre but the relationship is multifaceted. • A fine grain response is needed that recog - nizes the variety of outer London. There are common issues across outer London; con - gestion, the quality of public transport and other • Some outer London neighbourhoods have public services and the health of local High Streets successfully adapted to significant demo - but there is a danger in focusing on the need for in - graphic change; some feel threatened by their tervention without fully understanding what already proximity to central London, others derive works in the different places. London’s mayoral can - much direct benefit from their closeness. didates cannot afford to ignore outer London but Outer London offers an adaptable, flexible there are no obvious policy prescriptions. • but poorly understood built form. Many people continue to commute from outer to • The economic relationship between outer central London but many more journeys take place and central London is variable. within outer London. These complex patterns of com - muting are hard to satisfy through public transport. • The London Plan should allow for locally dis - Some parts of outer London remain white and tinct solutions; outer London needs nurturing wealthy, other parts are now home to successful eth - not prescription from the Mayor.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of London's Low Emission Zone on Air Quality and Children's Respiratory Health: a Sequential Annual Cross-Sectional Study
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30202-0 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Mudway, I. S., Dundas, I., Wood, H. E., Marlin, N., Jamaludin, J. B., Bremner, S. A., Cross, L., Grieve, A., Nanzer, A., Barratt, B. M., Beevers, S., Dajnak, D., Fuller, G. W., Font, A., Colligan, G., Sheikh, A., Walton, R., Grigg, J., Kelly, F. J., ... Griffiths, C. J. (2019). Impact of London's low emission zone on air quality and children's respiratory health: a sequential annual cross-sectional study. The Lancet Public Health, 4(1), e28-e40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30202-0 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Cards Contents
    Smart cards Contents 1 Smart card 1 1.1 History ................................................ 1 1.1.1 Invention ........................................... 1 1.1.2 Carte Bleue .......................................... 2 1.1.3 EMV ............................................. 2 1.1.4 Development of contactless systems ............................. 2 1.2 Design ................................................ 2 1.2.1 Contact smart cards ..................................... 3 1.2.2 Contactless smart cards .................................... 3 1.2.3 Hybrids ............................................ 4 1.3 Applications .............................................. 4 1.3.1 Financial ........................................... 4 1.3.2 SIM .............................................. 4 1.3.3 Identification ......................................... 4 1.3.4 Public transit ......................................... 5 1.3.5 Computer security ...................................... 6 1.3.6 Schools ............................................ 6 1.3.7 Healthcare .......................................... 6 1.3.8 Other uses .......................................... 6 1.3.9 Multiple-use systems ..................................... 6 1.4 Security ................................................ 6 1.5 Benefits ................................................ 6 1.6 Problems ............................................... 7 1.7 See also ................................................ 7 1.8 Further reading ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Making Rail Accessible: Helping Older and Disabled Passengers
    Making Rail Accessible: Helping Older and Disabled Passengers Valid from May 2016 Contents Page Introduction 2 About our services Policy Summary 4 Passenger Assistance 5-6 Turn Up and Go 7 Ramps Journeys with multiple operators Changes to facilities 8 Alternative accessible transport 9 Passenger Information Tickets and fares 10 At our stations 11-15 Station Entrance Aural and visual information Information points and displays Ticket machines Ticket Gates Luggage Left Luggage Ramps for boarding and alighting trains Facilities provided by third parties Aural and visual information On our trains 16-17 Seats on our trains Wheelchairs and Scooters Information about our trains Making Connections 18-19 Connection with other train services Intermodal connections Disruption to facilities and services Contact us 20 Station accessibility and key features 21-25 Route map 26 Introduction Welcome to Making rail accessible: helping older and disabled passengers. This guide provides information to help older or disabled passengers plan their journey with c2c, and makes up one half of our Disabled People’s Protection Policy (DPPP). The other half is called Making rail accessible: guide to policies and practices, which sets out c2c’s policies and strategies relating to accessibility. You can find Making rail accessible: helping older and disabled passengers in leaflet racks at all c2c stations, at the ticket office at other stations where c2c trains call, and on our website (in both PDF and Word formats). You can request a copy of either document from our Customer Relations team, who will send one within seven working days. About our services c2c operate passenger trains between London Fenchurch Street and Shoeburyness, calling at intermediate stations via Basildon, Tilbury Town and Grays.
    [Show full text]