DOCSLIB.ORG

GLOBAL CLIMATE OBSERVING SYSTEM SURFACE NETWORK MONITORING REPORT No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GLOBAL CLIMATE OBSERVING SYSTEM SURFACE NETWORK MONITORING REPORT No GLOBAL CLIMATE OBSERVING SYSTEM SURFACE NETWORK MONITORING REPORT No. 6, April 2002 Monitoring Period: July to December 2001 Published in co-operation of Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) and Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) Internet access to the GSNMCs under http://www.dwd.de/research/klis/gsn_mc/ Distribution List: • WMO Secretary General • President CBS • President CCl • WMO WWW Department • WMO WCP Department • WMO GCOS Secretariat Please, forward any questions or comments to Mr Stefan Rösner Mr Hidehiko Isobe Deutscher Wetterdienst Climate Prediction Division Department Climate and Environment Climate and Marine Department German GCOS-Office Japan Meteorological Agency Frankfurter Straße 135 1-3-4 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku D-63067 Offenbach am Main Tokyo 100-8122 Germany Japan Tel.: +49 69 8062 2762 Tel.: +81 3 3211 4966 Fax: +49 69 8062 3759 Fax: +81 3 3211 8406 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Contact for GSN data retrieval WORLD DATA CENTER A FOR METEOROLOGY Mr August L. Shumbera, Director Tel: +1 828 271 4445 WDC for Meteorology Tel: +1 828 271 4994 Federal Building Fax: +1 828 271 4246 151 Patton Ave., Room 120 ASHEVILLE NC 28801-5001 U.S.A. eMail: [email protected] WWW Home Page: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/wdcamet.html Contact Point for data requests: World Data Center for Meteorology, Asheville National Climatic Data Center Federal Building 151 Patton Ave., Room 120 Asheville, NC 28801-5001 or Telephone Numbers: Data Inquiries: +1 828-271-4800 Satellite Data Requests: +1 828-271-4850 FAX: +1 828-271-4246 eMail: [email protected] Homepage URL: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/wdcamet.html WORLD DATA CENTER B FOR METEOROLOGY Dr Marsel Z. Shaimardanov, Director Tel: +7 84 392 5181 WDC-B for Meteorology +7 84 392 0423 6 Korolev Str +7 95 255 2194 OBNINSK Fax: +7 95 255 2225 KALUGA REGION 249020 RUSSIA Internet: [email protected] WWW Home Page: http://www.meteo.ru/ Authors in alphabetical order: Tobias Fuchs (DWD/GPCC), Hidehiko Isobe (JMA), Christiana Lefebvre (DWD), Stefan Rösner (DWD), technical support by Jens Busche, and Volker Heil (DWD), editorial and layout support by Patricia Willing (DWD). Acknowledgement A great “thank you” to the staff of JMA and DWD not mentioned here who made this report possible. Contents SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 1 FINDINGS................................................................................................................... 3 1. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 4 2. MONITORING METHODS...................................................................................... 6 3. MONITORING RESULTS....................................................................................... 7 3.1 GSN Station List ............................................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Station Locations .............................................................................................................. 7 3.1.2 Discrepancies of GSN station list to WMO Vol. A ............................................................ 8 3.2 Timeliness ....................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Completeness ............................................................................................................... 10 3.3.1 Number and Percentage of all Surface Stations Reporting CLIMAT ............................. 10 Number and Percentage of GSN stations reporting CLIMAT ........................................................... 11 3.4 Correctness ................................................................................................................... 16 3.5 Quality check results.................................................................................................... 20 3.5.1 Precipitation .................................................................................................................. 20 3.5.2 Temperature .................................................................................................................. 21 4. REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 22 5. LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................... 23 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................ 24 Annex I Terms and Definitions .................................................................................................. 24 AI.1 The CLIMAT Bulletin....................................................................................................... 24 AI.2 The CLIMAT Message.................................................................................................... 24 AI.3 CLIMAT Stations.............................................................................................................24 AI.4 GSN Stations .................................................................................................................. 24 AI.5 Availability ....................................................................................................................... 25 AI.6 Timeliness....................................................................................................................... 25 AI.7 Completeness ................................................................................................................. 25 AI.8 The GSN Data Set ..................................................................................................................... 25 Annex II Decoding and Error Detection..................................................................................... 26 Annex III Availability Monitoring and Performance Indicator .................................................. 28 AIII.1 Availability Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 28 AIII.2 Performance Indicators ............................................................................................................ 28 Annex IV Quality Monitoring and Quality Control ..................................................................... 30 AIV.1 QC at DWD.............................................................................................................................. 30 AIV.2 QC at JMA ............................................................................................................................... 33 Annex V GCOS Surface Network (GSN) Station List (Status: December 2001) .......................... 34 AV.1 GCOS Surface Network (GSN) station list (Status: December 2001)...................................... 35 AV.2. Changes to GSN list ................................................................................................................ 58 AV.3 Spatial distribution of GSN stations .......................................................................................... 60 Annex VI: List of differences of the GSN station list (Status: December 2001) to WMO Vol. A as of October 29th 2001 ..................................................................................................... 61 Annex VII: Monitoring information for GSN stations ....................................................................... 64 TABLE AVII.3: GSN STATIONS FLAGGED 4 (‘MODIFIED’) OR 5 (‘DELETED’) IN QC REGARDING MONTHLY PRECIPITATION TOTALS ....................................... 69 TABLE AVII.4: GSN STATIONS FLAGGED 4 (‘MODIFIED’) OR 5 (‘DELETED’) IN QC REGARDING MONTHLY MEAN TEMPERATURE ........................................... 70 WMO- 70 TABLE AVII.5: PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR GSN STATIONS ................. 71 Annex VIII Examples for CLIMAT bulletins and messages of correct format .............................. 77 Annex IX The detailed error lists....................................................................................................... 79 Annex X The GSN Data Set .........................................................................................................80 Summary The GCOS Surface Network Monitoring Centre (GSNMC), implemented by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) and the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) started its activities by monitoring the availability of CLIMAT messages distributed over the Global Telecommunication System (GTS) (GCOS-53). The monitoring of the quality of included temperature and precipitation data at JMA and DWD respectively started in January 2000. As a fundamental step before starting the monitoring processes the station meta data needed to be checked. In Chapter 3.1 the results of checking the station meta data are given. Discrepancies in the station meta data from different sources reported in previous reports are still existing. 12 GSN stations were still not included or marked as CLIMAT(C) for surface stations or CLIMAT(CT) for upper air stations in the reference list WMO Vol. A. According to WMO regulations, CLIMAT messages should be dissemi nated until the 5th day, but not later than the 8th day of the following month. Chapter 3.2 shows that in 2001 on the average about 44% (year 2000: 35%) of GSN CLIMAT messages have been received until the 5th day and about 52% (46%) until the 8th day. The percentage of CLIMAT messages received by day 21, 00 UTC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Level of Apron Utility at Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport Maros
    IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 16, Issue 4 Ser. I (Jul. - Aug. 2019), PP 59-63 www.iosrjournals.org The Level of Apron Utility at Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport Maros Ida Umboro Wahyu Nur Wening1, M. Yamin Jinca2, Jamaluddin Rahim3 1Master Degree of Transportation Engineering, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, 2Professor for Transportation Planning, Urban and Regional Planning, Hasanuddin University, 3Lecturer, Transportation Engineering, Hasanuddin University, Makassar-Indonesia, Corresponding Author: Ida Umboro Wahyu Nur Wening Abstract: Demand for flight numbers is an important factor in planning the capacity and facility requirements at the airport. This study aims to forecast the number of airplane movements over the next 5 years using the ARIMA method, determine the utilization level of the apron with Analytical Models for Gate Capacity, and estimate the amount of parking stand (gate) needed using the formula number of airplane gates. The results showed that the best model for forecasting the number of departure and arrival flights was ARIMA (0,1,1). Th apron utility rate is 35% with the use of 40 parking stands during rush hour. The need for stand parking for the next 5 years is 55 gates. It was concluded that forecasting the number of airplane movements increased every year. The maximum capacity of 75% is 31%. Keywords: Flight Demand, Forecasting Models, Apron, Effectiveness ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Date of Submission: 01-07-2019 Date of acceptance: 16-07-2019 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- I. Introduction Air transportation has become one of the important modes of transportation for medium and long distance travel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethno-Linguistic Situation in the Krasnoyarsk Territory at the Beginning of the Third Millennium
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 7 (2011 4) 919-929 ~ ~ ~ УДК 81-114.2 The Ethno-Linguistic Situation in the Krasnoyarsk Territory at the Beginning of the Third Millennium Olga V. Felde* Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia 1 Received 4.07.2011, received in revised form 11.07.2011, accepted 18.07.2011 This article presents the up-to-date view of ethno-linguistic situation in polylanguage and polycultural the Krasnoyarsk Territory. The functional typology of languages of this Siberian region has been given; historical and proper linguistic causes of disequilibrum of linguistic situation have been developed; the objects for further study of this problem have been specified. Keywords: majority language, minority languages, native languages, languages of ethnic groups, diaspora languages, communicative power of the languages. Point Krasnoyarsk Territory which area (2339,7 thousand The study of ethno-linguistic situation in square kilometres) could cover the third part of different parts of the world, including Russian Australian continent. Sociolinguistic examination Federation holds a prominent place in the range of of the Krasnoyarsk Territory is important for the problems of present sociolinguistics. This field of solution of a number of the following theoretical scientific knowledge is represented by the works and practical objectives: for revelation of the of such famous scholars as V.M. Alpatov (1999), characteristics of communicative space of the A.A. Burikin (2004), T.G. Borgoyakova (2002), country and its separate regions, for monitoring V.V.
    [Show full text]
  • PT. Aviastar Mandiri PK – BRD British
    FINAL KNKT 09.12.04.01 NNAATTIIOONNAALL TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTTAATTIIOONN SSAAFFEETTYY COOMMMMIITTTTEEEE C Aircraft Accident Investigation Report PT. Aviastar Mandiri PK – BRD British Aerospace BAe 146-300 Wamena Airport, Papua Republic of Indonesia 9 April 2009 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMITTEE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA 2009 This Preliminary Factual Report was produced by the National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC), Karya Building 7th Floor Ministry of Transportation, Jalan Medan Merdeka Barat No. 8 JKT 10110, Indonesia. The report is based upon the investigation carried out by the NTSC in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Aviation Act (UU No.1/2009), and Government Regulation (PP No. 3/2001). Readers are advised that the NTSC investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing aviation safety. Consequently, NTSC reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As NTSC believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, acknowledging NTSC as the source. When the NTSC makes recommendations as a result of its investigations or research, safety is its primary consideration. However, the NTSC fully recognizes that the implementation of recommendations arising from its investigations will in some cases incur a cost to the industry. Readers should note that the information in NTSC reports and recommendations is provided to promote aviation safety. In no case is it intended to imply blame or liability. TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................................................................... I TABLE OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Annual Report ...2005-2007
    Flinders Centre for Airborne Research Airborne Research Australia - MNRF Tri-Annual Report 2005 – 2006 – 2007 Flinders Centre for Airborne Research FLINDERS UNIVERSITY ADELAIDE z AUSTRALIA NOTE: Both, FCAR and ARA are 100% self-funding research institutes. They do not receive any financial support or recurrent base-funding from their host organisation, the Australian Government or any other sources. The ARA MNRF was established with funding from the Major National Research Facilities (MNRF) Program of the Commonwealth of Australia. This funding was granted to cover capital cost only, no operational funding was included. Over the years, FCAR/ARA (and their predecessor FIAMS – the Flinders Institute for Atmospheric and Marine Sciences) has received substantial financial contributions in the form of grants, donations and bequests from the late Joyce and Don Schultz of Glen Osmond, SA and the South Australian Sir Ross and Sir Keith Smith Fund. FCAR is a research institute hosted within the Faculty of Social Sciences at Flinders University. Further copies of this document can be downloaded from www.airborneresearch.org.au/TriAnnualReport.pdf. Flinders Centre for Airborne Research - Airborne Research Australia PO Box 335 Salisbury South 5106 Ph: +61 8 8182 4000 Fax: +61 8 8285 6710 http://www.AirborneResearch.org.au The Tri-Annual Report for 2005 - 2007 was compiled by the FCAR/ARA Director and Chief Scientist, A/Prof. Jörg M Hacker © 2008 FCAR/ARA Tri-Annual Report 2005-2007 Flinders Centre for Airborne Research - Airborne Research Australia
    [Show full text]
  • "Don't Bother, Just Let Him Die"
    "DON'T BOTHER, JUST LET HIM DIE" KILLING WITH IMPUNITY IN PAPUA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International Indonesia 2018 Cover photo: A Papuan woman mourns the victim of shootings in Paniai Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a © Amnesty International Indonesia/Bagus Septa Pratama Creative Commons (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons license. First published in 2018 by Amnesty International Indonesia HDI Hive Menteng 3rd Floor, Probolinggo 18 Jakarta Pusat 10350 Index: ASA 21/8198/2018 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International Indonesia amnesty.org – amnestyindonesia.org "DON'T BOTHER, JUST LET HIM DIE": KILLING WITH IMPUNITY IN PAPUA "DON'T BOTHER, JUST LET HIM DIE": KILLING WITH IMPUNITY IN PAPUA 3 Amnesty International Indonesia CONTENTS GLOSSARY 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 2. BACKGROUND 13 3. INDONESIA’S OBLIGATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND IN NATIONAL LEGISLATION 23 4.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Committee Ministry of Transportation Republic of Indonesia 2009
    KNKT.08.03.06.04 NNAATTIIOONNAALL TTRR AANNSSPPOORRTTAATTIIOONN SSAAFFFosterEE BrooksTTYY drunk pilot skit.wmv CCOOMMMMIITTTTEEEE Aircraft Accident Investigation Report Transall C-160 PK–VTQ Wamena Airport, Wamena, Papua Republic of Indonesia 6 March 2008 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMITTEE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA 2009 This report was produced by the National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC), Karya Building 7th Floor Ministry of Transportation, Jalan Medan Merdeka Barat No. 8 JKT 10110, Indonesia. The report is based upon the investigation carried out by the NTSC in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Aviation Act (UU No.1/2009), and Government Regulation (PP No. 3/2001). Readers are advised that the NTSC investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing aviation safety. Consequently, NTSC reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As NTSC believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, acknowledging NTSC as the source. When the NTSC makes recommendations as a result of its investigations or research, safety is its primary consideration. However, the NTSC fully recognizes that the implementation of recommendations arising from its investigations will in some cases incur a cost to the industry. Readers should note that the information in NTSC reports and recommendations is provided to promote aviation safety. In no case is it intended to imply blame or liability. TABLE OF CONTENS TABLE OF CONTENS .......................................................................................... ii FIGURES ............................................................................................................... iv GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Report Consists of Factual Information Collected Until the Preliminary Report Published
    PRELIMINARY KNKT.16.09.27.04 Aircraft Accident Investigation Report PT. Trigana Air Service Boeing 737-300F; PK-YSY Wamena Airport, Papua Republic of Indonesia 13 September 2016 This preliminary investigation report was produced by the Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi (KNKT), Transportation Building, 3rd Floor, Jalan Medan Merdeka Timur No. 5 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia. The report is based upon the initial investigation carried out by the KNKT in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation Organization, the Indonesian Aviation Act (UU No. 1/2009) and Government Regulation (PP No. 62/2013). The preliminary report consists of factual information collected until the preliminary report published. This report will not include analysis and conclusion. Readers are advised that the KNKT investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing aviation safety. Consequently, the KNKT reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As the KNKT believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, acknowledging the KNKT as the source. When the KNKT makes recommendations as a result of its investigations or research, safety is its primary consideration. However, the KNKT fully recognizes that the implementation of recommendations arising from its investigations will in some cases incur a cost to the industry. Readers should note that the information in KNKT reports and recommendations is provided to promote aviation safety. In no case is it intended to imply blame or liability. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airspace Review Pilbara Basin
    Pilbara Region Airspace Review March 2021 Office of Airspace Regulation Page 2 of 42 File Reference: OP20/9 Document Reference: D20/264158 Document control: Version Issue/Nature of Revision Date 0.1 Initial draft May 2020 0.2 Peer Review Draft June 2020 0.3 Management review June 2020 0.4 Stakeholder exposure draft June 2020 0.5 Stakeholder exposure draft – peer November 2020 comments Pilbara Region Airspace Review - 2021 Version: 0.5 Office of Airspace Regulation Page 3 of 42 Executive Summary Note – this Airspace Review was conducted before the impact of COVID 19 on the aviation industry. The downturn in all aviation activity across Australia and internationally may have a significant impact on the analysis, outcomes and projections used in this report. It is noted that the downturn in aviation into Pilbara region has not been as significant as at aerodromes in the Eastern States due to the fly in fly out (FIFO) resource sector. The Airspace Act 20071 (Act)2 provides the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) with the authority to administer and regulate Australian-administered airspace and authorises CASA to undertake regular reviews of existing airspace arrangements. The Office of Airspace Regulation (OAR) within CASA has conducted an airspace review within 100 nautical miles (NM) of Coondewanna Airport (Coondewanna). This area is referred to as the Pilbara Region for the purpose of this review. The aim of the Pilbara Region review is to determine if the airspace remains fit for purpose.3 The review examined the airspace architecture, classifications, procedures and infrastructure from the surface up to Fight Level (FL) 180.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia Page 1 of 31
    2009 Human Rights Report: Indonesia Page 1 of 31 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » Human Rights Reports » 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices » East Asia and the Pacific » Indonesia 2009 Human Rights Report: Indonesia BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices March 11, 2010 Indonesia is a multiparty democracy with a population of approximately 245 million. On July 8, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono was reelected president in generally free and fair elections. April 9 legislative elections were complex, but domestic and international observers judged them generally free and fair as well. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces, although the fact that the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) continued to be partly self -financed weakened this control. The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens and upheld civil liberties. Nonetheless, there were problems during the year in the following areas: killings by security forces; vigilantism; harsh prison conditions; impunity for prison authorities and some other officials; corruption in the judicial system; limitations on free speech; societal abuse and discrimination against religious groups and interference with freedom of religion, sometimes with the complicity of local officials; violence and sexual abuse against women and children; trafficking in persons; child labor; and failure to enforce labor standards and worker rights. During the year the country continued to make progress in strengthening and consolidating its democracy. For example, the Indonesian National Police adopted a use of force policy that strictly proscribes the use of deadly force and allows it to track and minimize the use of force by police.
    [Show full text]
  • Safetaxi Australia Coverage List - Cycle 21S5
    SafeTaxi Australia Coverage List - Cycle 21S5 Australian Capital Territory Identifier Airport Name City Territory YSCB Canberra Airport Canberra ACT Oceanic Territories Identifier Airport Name City Territory YPCC Cocos (Keeling) Islands Intl Airport West Island, Cocos Island AUS YPXM Christmas Island Airport Christmas Island AUS YSNF Norfolk Island Airport Norfolk Island AUS New South Wales Identifier Airport Name City Territory YARM Armidale Airport Armidale NSW YBHI Broken Hill Airport Broken Hill NSW YBKE Bourke Airport Bourke NSW YBNA Ballina / Byron Gateway Airport Ballina NSW YBRW Brewarrina Airport Brewarrina NSW YBTH Bathurst Airport Bathurst NSW YCBA Cobar Airport Cobar NSW YCBB Coonabarabran Airport Coonabarabran NSW YCDO Condobolin Airport Condobolin NSW YCFS Coffs Harbour Airport Coffs Harbour NSW YCNM Coonamble Airport Coonamble NSW YCOM Cooma - Snowy Mountains Airport Cooma NSW YCOR Corowa Airport Corowa NSW YCTM Cootamundra Airport Cootamundra NSW YCWR Cowra Airport Cowra NSW YDLQ Deniliquin Airport Deniliquin NSW YFBS Forbes Airport Forbes NSW YGFN Grafton Airport Grafton NSW YGLB Goulburn Airport Goulburn NSW YGLI Glen Innes Airport Glen Innes NSW YGTH Griffith Airport Griffith NSW YHAY Hay Airport Hay NSW YIVL Inverell Airport Inverell NSW YIVO Ivanhoe Aerodrome Ivanhoe NSW YKMP Kempsey Airport Kempsey NSW YLHI Lord Howe Island Airport Lord Howe Island NSW YLIS Lismore Regional Airport Lismore NSW YLRD Lightning Ridge Airport Lightning Ridge NSW YMAY Albury Airport Albury NSW YMDG Mudgee Airport Mudgee NSW YMER Merimbula
    [Show full text]
  • Safetaxi Full Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle
    SafeTaxi Full Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle Australia Australian Capital Territory Identifier Airport Name City Territory YSCB Canberra Airport Canberra ACT Oceanic Territories Identifier Airport Name City Territory YPCC Cocos (Keeling) Islands Intl Airport West Island, Cocos Island AUS YPXM Christmas Island Airport Christmas Island AUS YSNF Norfolk Island Airport Norfolk Island AUS New South Wales Identifier Airport Name City Territory YARM Armidale Airport Armidale NSW YBHI Broken Hill Airport Broken Hill NSW YBKE Bourke Airport Bourke NSW YBNA Ballina / Byron Gateway Airport Ballina NSW YBRW Brewarrina Airport Brewarrina NSW YBTH Bathurst Airport Bathurst NSW YCBA Cobar Airport Cobar NSW YCBB Coonabarabran Airport Coonabarabran NSW YCDO Condobolin Airport Condobolin NSW YCFS Coffs Harbour Airport Coffs Harbour NSW YCNM Coonamble Airport Coonamble NSW YCOM Cooma - Snowy Mountains Airport Cooma NSW YCOR Corowa Airport Corowa NSW YCTM Cootamundra Airport Cootamundra NSW YCWR Cowra Airport Cowra NSW YDLQ Deniliquin Airport Deniliquin NSW YFBS Forbes Airport Forbes NSW YGFN Grafton Airport Grafton NSW YGLB Goulburn Airport Goulburn NSW YGLI Glen Innes Airport Glen Innes NSW YGTH Griffith Airport Griffith NSW YHAY Hay Airport Hay NSW YIVL Inverell Airport Inverell NSW YIVO Ivanhoe Aerodrome Ivanhoe NSW YKMP Kempsey Airport Kempsey NSW YLHI Lord Howe Island Airport Lord Howe Island NSW YLIS Lismore Regional Airport Lismore NSW YLRD Lightning Ridge Airport Lightning Ridge NSW YMAY Albury Airport Albury NSW YMDG Mudgee Airport Mudgee NSW YMER
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Association V (South-West Pacific)
    WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION REGIONAL ASSOCIATION V (SOUTH-WEST PACIFIC) ELEVENTH SESSION NOUMEA, 18-27 MAY 1994 ABRIDGED FINAL REPORT WITH RESOLUTIONS WMO-No.811 Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization - Geneva - Switzerland 1995 © 1995, World Meteorological Organization ISBN 92-63-10811-0 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expres­ sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. CONTENTS Page GENERAL SUMMARY OF THE WORK OF THE SESSION 1. OPENING OF THE SESSION • ........ ................... ........................................................ ..................... 1 2. ORGANIZATION OF THE SESSION ......... ................ ............... ........ ........ ................... ......... ............ 2 2.1 Consideration of the report on credentials ...... ....................... ............................................... 2 2.2 Adoption of the agenda ..................................................................... ,.... ............... ........... ...... 2 2.3 Establishnient of committees ....... ........................... ...................... ........................ ............ ..... 2 2.4 Other organizational matters .................. ...... ...................... ...... ...................... .................. ..... 2 3. REpORT
    [Show full text]