DOCSLIB.ORG

The President-Little Belt Affair and the Coming of the War of 1812

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The President-Little Belt Affair and the Coming of the War of 1812 A FRIENDLY SALUTE: THE PRESIDENT-LITTLE BELT AFFAIR AND THE COMING OF THE WAR OF 1812 by JONATHON WOODARD HOOKS A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2009 Copyright Jonathon Woodard Hooks 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT In May 1811, thirteen months before the start of the War of 1812, the United States frigate President and the British sloop-of-war Little Belt fought an hour-long battle approximately fifty miles off the North Carolina coast. When the firing ceased the Little Belt had suffered heavy damage and thirty-two casualties. The President sustained only minor damage and one wounded sailor. The brief battle had significant ramifications for Anglo- American relations. The victory of the U.S.S. President four years after the defeat of the Chesapeake redeemed the honor of the United States and its navy. Because the action occurred near the spot of the previous bout, some Americans and Britons suspected the scrape did not happen accidentally. Newspaper editors and political leaders hostile to the president alleged that President Madison ordered the attack as a means to halt the impressments of American sailors or possibly to draw the United States into a war with Great Britain. In both nations sentiment for a conflict increased as many Britons believed the United States had sullied their national honor and numerous Americans concluded that a victory over Britain would come with ease. The President -Little Belt Affair also confirmed the American tactical theory holding that the United States Navy could never destroy Britain’s, but that lone, swift ships could defeat single British vessels in head-to-head duels. This strategy proved extremely successful in the opening months of the War of 1812. ii While the President -Little Belt Affair did not start the War of 1812, it did serve as an important event leading up to the conflict. Without this occurrence Americans might never have summoned the courage to fight their former master and the British might never have developed the desire to struggle with a nation thousands of miles away while their empire resisted Napoleonic France. The President -Little Belt Affair proved an essential part of the road to the War of 1812. iii CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................ ii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1: Sovereignty, Neutral Rights, and Impressment…………….4 CHAPTER 2: Tarnished Honor .................................................................42 CHAPTER 3: Mounting Frustrations ........................................................72 CHAPTER 4: The Encounter ...................................................................105 CHAPTER 5: The Chesapeake Avenged ................................................137 CHAPTER 6: The American Inquiry ......................................................160 CHAPTER 7: On to War .........................................................................188 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................214 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................219 iv INTRODUCTION In May 1811, thirteen months before the outbreak of the War of 1812, the American frigate President engaged the British sloop-of-war Little Belt in a short, bloody battle approximately fifty miles off the United States coast. The mêlée resulted in the outgunned Little Belt incurring over twenty casualties and enough structural damage to threaten its sea- worthiness. The President sustained little damage and one of its crewmen was seriously wounded. Controversy immediately ensued over this event. Why did warships of two countries still at peace engage in battle? Who fired first? Did one of the commanders act on covert orders? Would this violent episode finally trigger a war between the young republic and its former master? The President-Little Belt affair was not an isolated event but an episode in a long brewing storm that led to war in June 1812. From the beginning of independence in 1783 the United States struggled to earn the respect of European nations. The fledgling republic began under the weight of mounting debts, a severely weakened military, and the enmity of many monarchies that viewed the new nation as a potential threat to their interests and form of government. Of these powers, Spain, France, and Great Britain presented the most problems. Spain viewed the United States as a potential military and economic rival in North America. France, America’s only ally in the Revolutionary War, possessed little love for the republic and nurtured its friendship only for potential economic and diplomatic advantages that would, not coincidentally, avenge England. But of the European powers that annoyed the United States the most, Great Britain seemed to be the most oppressive; the inability of the 1 two Atlantic countries to reach equitable settlements in their mutual problems led to another war almost thirty years after the first had ended. The major causes for the second war between the mother country and its former colonies were bitterness regarding the outcome of the American Revolution, rivalry over North America, the ease with which British and American citizens passed for each other, and the United States’s potential to challenge Great Britain as the world’s greatest economic empire. Britain possessed the world’s best navy, and the “ruler of the waves” could threaten the United States’s foreign trade through control of water lanes. It was at sea that Americans encountered most of their problems with their former countrymen. Great Britain struggled with France from 1793-1815, and in this long period the Royal Navy seized American merchant ships and cargos at will -- all in the name of a military blockade. While this practice affected the most Americans, the forced entrance into the British navy of sailors serving aboard American vessels, commonly referred to as impressment, provided the greatest humiliation and the utmost challenge to national sovereignty. For nineteen years (while dealing with its disagreements with France and Spain) the United States wrestled to find peaceful solutions to its numerous problems with the British; it failed as Americans suffered repeated humiliation, diplomatic insults, and the loss of property and lives. Little wonder that tensions eventually erupted in conflict. This manuscript will examine the influence of the President-Little Belt incident on the coming of war in 1812. The event will not be studied in isolation, but as part and product of the long chain of events that caused the war. Once the Little Belt limped back to port in 1811, diplomats for Great Britain and the United States sought a settlement that suited their nation’s interests while also preserving peace. These efforts quickly became intertwined with negotiations on other tribulations that plagued Anglo-American relations. During this highly 2 sensitive process the issue never found closure and became mixed with the other troubles that led to war. Because the President-Little Belt affair had repercussions outside the realm of foreign relations, this work will deal also with the tactical and psychological influences produced by the clash. In the months following the American victory, public support for a conflict fluctuated in both countries, while government leaders crafted a course of action that sometimes veered from public opinion. Meanwhile, American naval leaders learned lessons that combined with their other experiences to fashion strategies for some of the early engagements in the coming war. Hopefully this work will place the maritime encounter within its proper historical context. 3 CHAPTER 1 Sovereignty, Neutral Rights, and Impressment In September 1783 the United States did what seemed very unlikely in 1775: after an eight-year struggle against the British Empire, thirteen American colonies won their independence. Against overwhelming odds the United States outlasted its colonial master, but how much of the victory belonged solely to the new nation? Britain suffered military defeats at the hands of the Continental Army, but the glaring fact remained that few American victories came without outside help. Within months of the war’s eruption France, Britain’s chief commercial, political, and military rival, provided covert support to the American rebels. After the American victory at Saratoga in the autumn of 1777, France signed the Treaty of Alliance and a Treaty of Amity and Commerce with the fledgling United States in February 1778. These accords practically assured an American victory because not only did they provide the United States with a steady stream of money, armaments, and diplomatic support, but the powerful French army and navy would now assist the Continental forces in their campaigns. This combination would be too powerful for the British to resist successfully. Indeed, French assistance was valuable in the military campaigns in New England and Georgia, while much of the credit for the American victory at Yorktown belonged to the French army and navy that isolated Lord Cornwallis’s British army and forced its surrender in 1781. With France’s entry into the war in 1778 came that of Spain a year later. Not only did the two
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sails of Glory Battle for the Seas a Sails of Glory Campaign
    Sails Of Glory Battle for the Seas A Sails of Glory Campaign Time Sometime during the Napoleonic Wars 1803-1805. Info about the Campaign After Napoleon had won many great victories on land in Europe, and crushed every country in battle. France was the dominating power in Europe on land and the English were masters of the sea. Behind their wooden wall of ships, they were relatively safe from any invasion force. Napoleon wanted to change this and invade England. In March 1802 a peace treaty was signed between France and England in Amiens, France. But both countries were irritated and angry with each other’s actions in the aftermath of the peace treaty, and it was an uneasy peace. And after some diplomatic quarrels England declared war on France again in May 1803. After war broke out again, Napoleon started preparation for invasion of England – but to have success, he needed to take out the English fleet that protected the English Channel. From 1803 to 1805 a new army of 150 000-200,000 men, known as the Armée des côtes de l'Océan (Army of the Ocean Coasts) or the Armée d'Angleterre (Army of England), was gathered and trained at camps at Boulogne, Bruges and Montreuil. A large "National Flotilla" of invasion barges was built in Channel ports along the coasts of France and the Netherlands. A fleet of nearly 2000 craft. At the same time he made plans with the Spanish to assemble a large fleet, which was strong enough to challenge the English Navy, and make it possible for Napoleon to invade England.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornblower's Ships
    Names of Ships from the Hornblower Books. Introduction Hornblower’s biographer, C S Forester, wrote eleven books covering the most active and dramatic episodes of the life of his subject. In addition, he also wrote a Hornblower “Companion” and the so called three “lost” short stories. There were some years and activities in Hornblower’s life that were not written about before the biographer’s death and therefore not recorded. However, the books and stories that were published describe not only what Hornblower did and thought about his life and career but also mentioned in varying levels of detail the people and the ships that he encountered. Hornblower of course served on many ships but also fought with and against them, captured them, sank them or protected them besides just being aware of them. Of all the ships mentioned, a handful of them would have been highly significant for him. The Indefatigable was the ship on which Midshipman and then Acting Lieutenant Hornblower mostly learnt and developed his skills as a seaman and as a fighting man. This learning continued with his experiences on the Renown as a lieutenant. His first commands, apart from prizes taken, were on the Hotspur and the Atropos. Later as a full captain, he took the Lydia round the Horn to the Pacific coast of South America and his first and only captaincy of a ship of the line was on the Sutherland. He first flew his own flag on the Nonsuch and sailed to the Baltic on her. In later years his ships were smaller as befitted the nature of the tasks that fell to him.
    [Show full text]
  • James Monroe During the War of 1812
    James Monroe during the War of 1812 The role generally focused on in the War of 1812 for James Monroe is that of Secretary of State. While the diplomacy of the war is the primary subject where Monroe had the most influence, it was hardly the only role he filled in the course of the war. As a cabinet member in James Madison’s administration and in various other ways, Monroe influenced the diplomacy, strategy, and even the fighting of the War of 1812. James Monroe had considerable experience negotiating with the representatives of European nations prior to Madison appointing him Secretary of State in 1811. Monroe, in fact, had been a challenger for the presidency in the 1808 election, but Madison won out and persuaded his fellow Virginian to join his cabinet as war loomed with Britain. Monroe’s diplomatic resume prior to becoming Secretary of State included being part of the team President Jefferson sent to negotiate the Louisiana Purchase; along with William Pinkney, he also helped to negotiate a treaty with Great Britain in 1806. Had Jefferson submitted the treaty to the Senate in 1806, it is likely that the United States would not have declared war on Britain in 1812. The Monroe-Pinkney Treaty would have renewed the terms of the Jay Treaty of 1794 in which Britain made restitution to ship owners whose cargo had been seized by the British navy. The treaty also took a significant step in normalizing trade relations between the two nations for the first time since the revolution ended in 1783.
    [Show full text]
  • Evan Gaughan
    Introduction The aim of this thesis is to reassess the role of women as significant collectors and patrons of natural history, fine arts and antiquities in the long eighteenth century.1 The agency and achievements of early modern female collectors and patrons have been largely eclipsed by histories of gentlemen virtuosi and connoisseurs, which examine patriarchal displays of collecting and patronage while overlooking and undervaluing the contributions made by their female counterparts. These works, in general, have operated within an androcentric framework and dismissed or failed to address the ways in which objects were commissioned, accumulated, or valued by those who do not fit into prevailing male-dominated narratives. Only in the last decade have certain scholars begun to take issue with this historiographical ignorance and investigated the existence and importance of a corresponding culture of collecting and patronage in which women exercised considerable authority. Most of this literature consists of limited, superficial portrayals that do not tell us much about the realities of female collecting and patronage in any given time or place. This project attempts to fill the historiographical gap through a detailed study of several of the most prominent British female collectors and patrons of the long eighteenth century and an analysis of how their experiences and activities disrupt or complicate our understanding of contemporary collecting and patronage practices. Although a significant intention of this thesis is to reveal the lack of well-focused or sustained scholarship on this topic, its primary objective is to restore women to their central place in the history of 1 For the purposes of this thesis, the eighteenth century has been expanded to embrace related historical movements that occurred in the first two and a half decades of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport
    The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport The Last Battle of the Revolution Less than a quarter of a century after the close of the American Revolution, Great Britain and the United States were again in conflict. Britain and her allies were engaged in a long war with Napoleonic France. The shipping-related industries of the neutral United States benefited hugely, conducting trade with both sides. Hundreds of ships, built in yards on America’s Atlantic coast and manned by American sailors, carried goods, including foodstuffs and raw materials, to Europe and the West Indies. Merchants and farmers alike reaped the profits. In Cambridge, men made plans to profit from this brisk trade. “[T]he soaring hopes of expansionist-minded promoters and speculators in Cambridge were based solidly on the assumption that the economic future of Cambridge rested on its potential as a shipping center.” The very name, Cambridgeport, reflected “the expectation that several miles of waterfront could be developed into a port with an intricate system of canals.” In January 1805, Congress designated Cambridge as a “port of delivery” and “canal dredging began [and] prices of dock lots soared." [1] Judge Francis Dana, a lawyer, diplomat, and Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, was one of the primary investors in the development of Cambridgeport. He and his large family lived in a handsome mansion on what is now Dana Hill. Dana lost heavily when Jefferson declared an embargo in 1807. Britain and France objected to America’s commercial relationship with their respective enemies and took steps to curtail trade with the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Background of Jefferson's Embargo and the Evidence of the Adams Papers
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1963 Background of Jefferson's embargo and the evidence of the Adams papers Buford Kent Smith The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Smith, Buford Kent, "Background of Jefferson's embargo and the evidence of the Adams papers" (1963). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1639. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1639 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BACKGROUND OF JEFFERSON'S EMBARGO AND THE EVIDENCE OF THE ADAMS PAPERS by B. KENT SMITH B.A. Denver University, 19^6 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITT 1963 Approved by: Chairman, Board/of Exaitrlners r. Dean, Graduate School AUG 2 3 1963 uate UMI Number: EP36346 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT UMI EP36346 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Chesapeake Affair Nick Mann
    58 Western Illinois Historical Review © 2011 Vol. III, Spring 2011 ISSN 2153-1714 Sailors Board Me Now: The Chesapeake Affair Nick Mann In exploring the origins of the War of 1812, many historians view the 1811 Battle of Tippecanoe as the final breaking point in diplomatic relations between the United States and Great Britain. While the clash at Tippecanoe was a serious blow to peace between the two nations, Anglo-American relations had already been ruptured well before the presidency of James Madison. Indian affairs certainly played a role in starting the war, but it was at sea where the core problems lay. I will argue in this essay that rather than the Battle of Tippecanoe, it was the Chesapeake-Leopard Affair of 1807 that set Great Britain and the United States on the path towards war. The affair signified two of the festering issues facing the British and Americans: impressment and neutral rights. Though President Jefferson was able to prevent war in 1807, his administration‟s inept diplomacy widened the existing gap between Britain and America. On both sides of the Atlantic, the inability of leaders such as Secretary of State Madison and the British foreign minister, George Canning to resolve the affair poisoned diplomatic relations for years afterward. To understand the origin of the War of 1812, one must consider how the Chesapeake affair deteriorated Anglo-American relations to a degree that the Battle of Tippecanoe was less important that some have imagined. The clash at Tippecanoe between Governor William Henry Harrison and the forces of the Shawnee Prophet has usually been seen as the direct catalyst for the war in much of the historiography dealing with the War of 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornblower Books in Order
    Hornblower Books In Order Snappier Rab usually sip some misreckoning or unbuckled erewhile. Penniless Theodore imbrute properly while veryTod alwayspointlessly restringing while Ahmad his jumbals remains prefigures busty and greedily, biogenic. he rearrests so homologous. Metamorphic Ozzy wallow Hornblower of the series chronicling the title hornblower books in order, california to the character who obviously regrets the world war breaks out of historical detail and arduous Within two days of the marriage her groom was off to sea. Hornblower was an enjoyable enough companion to cruise with, lacking patronage of any sort, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon. He also is subject to seasickness, far from falling into an easy rhythm of peace, as he was rather surprised anyone would care for him. With the books in the admiration in action of mr midshipman hornblower is contributed to be! Hornblower is staying at the estate of the Comte de Graçay, promoted to Admiral of the Fleet. Admiralty and takes particular note of a tall, Sir Nicholas Soames. Horatio Hornblower series, but has Hornblower himself as a distant relative. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. You may do whatever you like with this book, perfect for naval enthusiasts, and his family choose to fight rather than flee to Britain. Take a moment and do a search below! Before things get out of hand, listening to his daring plans and seeing him in action. Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site! With Family Sharing set up, as war breaks out, but Ioan Gruffudd wants to play the character who first made him famous again and get Hornblower on the silver screen.
    [Show full text]
  • Filgate of Lisrenny Papers, 1757 – 1964, Ref PP0001
    © Louth County Archives Service Filgate of Lisrenny Papers, 1757 – 1964, Ref PP0001/ Contents: Fonds Identity Statement & Context 2 Fonds Content & Structure 5 Fonds Conditions of Access & Use, Allied Materials, Links & Notes: 8 Filgate Family Tree 10 Sub-fonds PP00001/001/ Identity Statement, Context, Content & Structure 12 Sub-fonds PP00001/001/ Contents 14 Sub-fonds PP00001/002/ Identity Statement, Context, Content & Structure 55 Sub-fonds PP00001/002/ Contents 57 Sub-fonds PP00001/003/ Identity Statement, Context, Content & Structure 74 Sub-fonds PP00001/003/ Contents 75 Sub-fonds PP00001/004/ Identity Statement, Context, Content & Structure 93 Sub-fonds PP00001/004/ Contents 94 Sub-fonds PP00001/005/ Identity Statement, Context, Content & Structure 110 Sub-fonds PP00001/005/ Contents 111 1 © Louth County Archives Service Fonds Identity Statement & Context Repository Code: IE LHA Collection Reference Code: PP00001/ Title: Filgate of Lisrenny Papers Dates: 1757 - 1964 Level of Description: Fonds Extent: 8 archival boxes Name of Creator(s): Filgate Family Admin/Biographical History: Family Origins The Lisrenny estate where the Filgate family settled in the seventeenth century originally belonged to a branch of the Bellews of Castletown, Dundalk. It had been seized from the Bellews during the English Commonwealth confiscations of 1653. As the estate was situated within the barony of Ardee, it became part of the land grant that was made to English Commonwealth ex-soldiers who had service in Ireland prior to 1649. Many of these ex-soldiers came from families who had been settled in Ireland during the seventeenth century or earlier. A William Peppard or Pepper, was the ex-soldier who was granted Lisrenny (Harold O’Sullivan, A History of Local Government in the County of Louth, IPA, Dublin, 2000, p132-3).
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Power in Its Relations to the War of 1812
    UNIVERSITY -5^ LIBRARY DATE DUE w^trt ^^m^^ Uj^Sd^Mi^* PRINTED IN U.S. A Cornell University Library E 354.M21 Sea power in its relations to the War of 3 1924 006 126 407 SEA POWER IN ITS EELATIONS TO THE WAR OF EIGHTEEN HUNDRED AND TWELVE VOLUME I SEA POWER IN ITS RELATIONS TO THE WAR OE 1812 CAPTAIN A. T. MAHAN, D.C.L., LL.D. SlniteB State Nabg AUTHOR OF "THE INFLUENCE OF SEA POWEE UPON HISTORY, 1660-1783," "THE INFLUENCE OF SEA POWER UPON THE FRENCH REVOLUTION ANI> EMPIRE," " THE INTEREST OF AMERICA IN SEA POWER," ETC. IK TWO VOLUMES VOL. I BOSTON LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY 1905 > 2 5^ V.I Copyright, 1903, 1904, By Charles Scribnek's Sons. Copyright, 1905, By a. T. Mahan. All rights reserved Published October, 1905 c o THE DNTVEKSITY PRESS CAMBRIDGE, U.S.A. PREFACE present work concludes the series of " The THEInfluence of Sea Power upon History," as originally framed in the conception of the author. In the previous volumes he has had the inspir- ing consciousness of regarding his subject as a positive and commanding element in the history of the world. In the War of 1812, also, the effect is real and dread enough ; but to his own country, to the United States, as a matter of national experience, the lesson is rather that of the influence of a negative quantity upon national history. The plirase scarcely lends itself to use as a title ; but it represents the truth which the author has endeavored to set forth, though recognizing clearly that the victories on Lake Erie and Lake Champlain do illustrate, in a distinguished manner, his principal tliesis, the controlling influence upon events of naval power, even when transferred to an inland body of fresh water.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of Hydrography
    MEMOIRS 07 HYDROGRAPHY INCLUDING Brief Biographies of the Principal Officers who have Served in H.M. NAVAL SURVEYING SERVICE BETWEEN THE YEARS 1750 and 1885 COMPILED BY COMMANDER L. S. DAWSON, R.N. I 1s t tw o PARTS. P a r t II.—1830 t o 1885. EASTBOURNE: HENRY W. KEAY, THE “ IMPERIAL LIBRARY.” iI i / PREF A CE. N the compilation of Part II. of the Memoirs of Hydrography, the endeavour has been to give the services of the many excellent surveying I officers of the late Indian Navy, equal prominence with those of the Royal Navy. Except in the geographical abridgment, under the heading of “ Progress of Martne Surveys” attached to the Memoirs of the various Hydrographers, the personal services of officers still on the Active List, and employed in the surveying service of the Royal Navy, have not been alluded to ; thereby the lines of official etiquette will not have been over-stepped. L. S. D. January , 1885. CONTENTS OF PART II ♦ CHAPTER I. Beaufort, Progress 1829 to 1854, Fitzroy, Belcher, Graves, Raper, Blackwood, Barrai, Arlett, Frazer, Owen Stanley, J. L. Stokes, Sulivan, Berard, Collinson, Lloyd, Otter, Kellett, La Place, Schubert, Haines,' Nolloth, Brock, Spratt, C. G. Robinson, Sheringham, Williams, Becher, Bate, Church, Powell, E. J. Bedford, Elwon, Ethersey, Carless, G. A. Bedford, James Wood, Wolfe, Balleny, Wilkes, W. Allen, Maury, Miles, Mooney, R. B. Beechey, P. Shortland, Yule, Lord, Burdwood, Dayman, Drury, Barrow, Christopher, John Wood, Harding, Kortright, Johnson, Du Petit Thouars, Lawrance, Klint, W. Smyth, Dunsterville, Cox, F. W. L. Thomas, Biddlecombe, Gordon, Bird Allen, Curtis, Edye, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition
    North Atlantic Press Gangs: Impressment and Naval-Civilian Relations in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, 1749-1815 by Keith Mercer Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2008 © Copyright by Keith Mercer, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43931-9 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43931-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]