News from Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation ISSUE 18 I JULY 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

News from Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation ISSUE 18 I JULY 2012 news News from Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation ISSUE 18 I JULY 2012 Nyangumarta and Karajarri dancers for the full story see page 3 Nyangumarta people welcome Justice Anthony North to country for story see page 3 Contents 2 Hello and Welcome from the Co- Chairs of the Board of Directors Hello 3 Recognition of Native Title over shared country: the Nyangumarta and people and the Karajarri people welcome celebrated a determination of joint native title 6 Proposed WA Heritage Reforms: the State Government is making changes that will affect Indigenous heritage sites 7 Agreement focuses on sustainability: The Ngarlawangga people have reached an agreement with Rico Resources 8 20 Years on, Remembering Eddie Mabo: Read about the life and acheivements of Eddie Mabo, and the ways YMAC has been Pilbara Chairperson, Mrs. Eaton Yamatji Chairperson, Peter Windie celebrating this anniversary Hello and welcome to issue 18 of way it administers Aboriginal heritage 10 YMAC finalists in Community YMAC News, Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal protection. We encourage all of our Services Awards Corporation’s quarterly newsletter. readers to get in touch with the State and There has been so much happening for Government to tell them what you think YMAC News profiles staff member Traditional Owners in the Midwest and about these plans. Daniel Shiosaki Pilbara regions that we had to expand June saw the 20th anniversary of the In the Community: YMAC News this edition of YMAC News to fit it all in. 11 Mabo decision, and on pages 8 and 9 profiles Fred Taylor, a successful We are very pleased to be able to tell you you can read about some of the ways Yamatji businessman and ex-YMAC employee about a joint determination of native that YMAC has been celebrating and title that took place on Anna Plains remembering. Respect For Elders: YMAC profiles 12 Station recently with the Nyangumarta Clarrie Cameron There is also much more inside, so thank and Karajarri people. you for taking the time to read this Launch of the Wajarri Dictionary: a 13 There have also been positive expanded edition of YMAC News. celebration at the end of 25 years developments with an agreement of hard work We invite all of our readers to send between the Ngarlawangga people and Policy Matters: YMAC’s Policy their questions, suggestions, ideas and 14 Rico Resources and the launch of the Officer Christina Colegate discusses photos to [email protected] or PO Wadjarri Dictionary by the Bundiyarra current policy issues box 3072, 249 Hay St, East Perth WA 6892 Irra-Wangga language program. (attn: editor). We look forward to hearing 15 YMAC in pictures: a few snapshots of YMAC staff and Committee On page 6 you will find some very from you! members out and about important information about the State Government’s plan to change the news I 2 Recognition of native title over shared country On Friday May 25, the Federal native title consent determination is groups, from way back. Native Title Court handed down a native title very powerful,’’ he said. brought conflict because we each had determination to the Nyangumarta and to prove that the land was ours. But “Native title provides our people with Karajarri communities across shared through strong connection to country, rights; rights to enjoy our country and country near 80 Mile Beach in Western we were able to show how both groups make decisions about what happens Australia. are connected to the land together. on our country. We welcome today’s This brings hope that other groups can The Nyangumarta/Karajarri joint determination.’’ follow this example and share country in determination resolves two overlapping Nyangumarta Traditional Owner a happy spirit. It’s appropriate that this is claims of the Nyangumarta and Karajarri Margaret Rose said, “Years ago, this happening in reconciliation week.” peoples, two different tribal groups country was shared between the two who share traditional laws and cultural connection to the area. Justice North handed down the Federal Court’s decision at an on-country determination at Anna Plains Station. The Kimberley Land Council and the Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation acted on behalf of the Karajarri and Nyangumarta claimants to negotiate native title across 2000 square kilometres of land and sea country across Anna Plains Station, a portion of Mandora Station and 80 Mile Beach, in the East Pilbara and West Kimberley regions of WA. Kimberley Land Council Executive Board Member and Karajarri Traditional Owner Anthony Watson said the Nyangumarta/ Karajarri joint native title determination highlighted how two tribal groups could work together to achieve land rights. “Today’s determination is about co- operation and respect for each other. For these two groups to come together, acknowledge their shared interests in this country and achieve a successful Badimia Working Group member Victor J. Little Karajarri elder Lenny Hopiga and Nyangumarta elder Nyaparu (Margaret) Rose news I 3 Recognition of native title over shared country Karajarri Traditional Owner Thomas King said Friday’s determination was the final step for his people in securing native title across all their traditional country. “All our land and sea country is now covered by native title. This shows the commitment and determination of our people to pursue land rights. But native title is about more than land rights, it’s about finally being recognised as the traditional owners of our country,’’ he said. “Our people have a great connection to country. Our law, language and culture are vibrant and alive. We want to leave a lasting legacy for our children and with today’s native title determination we can achieve that.’’ Nyangumarta elder Charlie Wright Karajarri Rangers news I 4 Nyangumarta people welcoming Justice North to country The determination is comprised of mostly non-exclusive native title rights, permitting Traditional Owners to hunt, fish, gather, access and conduct ceremonies on their ancestral lands. Simon Hawkins, CEO of YMAC, congratulated the groups on their achievement, “The Nyangumarta and Karajarri people should be very proud, this is a positive achievement for everyone. This is a historic day, and a cause for celebration.” Karajarri elders Lenny Hopiga, John Watson and Anthony Watson (behind) with Justice North news I 5 Proposed WA heritage reforms On May 1 2012 the WA Government The State Government called for public DIA outlining our main concerns with released a Discussion Paper putting submissions on the proposals by 6 June, the proposals, and the process that led forward seven proposals to reform the which was later extended to 26 June up to them. The submission includes Aboriginal Heritage protection regime. 2012. some comments on the Government’s This was done without any process of proposals, but most of the proposals After the discussion paper was released, consultation with Aboriginal people. in the Discussion Paper didn’t include YMAC arranged for several Board and enough detail for YMAC to give a The Government is claiming that the Committee members, other Traditional thorough response. YMAC instead took changes will improve the involvement Owners who are involved in heritage the opportunity to tell the Government of Aboriginal people in the process and protection and senior YMAC staff to meet what Aboriginal Heritage reforms should strengthen protection of Aboriginal with the Department of Indigenous look like. These proposals are in line with heritage. However, the proposals Affairs (DIA) and Dr. John Avery, who is YMAC’s Heritage Policy that has been hand control over to Department of in charge of the review. endorsed by the Board of Directors. Indigenous Affairs officers to decide YMAC has also been discussing a YMAC’s proposals cover five main areas: what a significant heritage site is and coordinated approach with the other how it should be managed. This is simply • improved standards of heritage WA Native Title Representative Bodies. not good enough. protection, in line with YMAC sent a letter about the proposals Internationally recognised human Simon Hawkins, YMAC CEO, said “For and review process to all YMAC claim rights standards, the Native Title Traditional Owners, the current Act Working Group members in order to Act and various other nationally is more a licence to destroy heritage raise awareness about the issue and recognised heritage standards than a mechanism to protect it. These encourage traditional owners to tell the proposals will only reinforce this view.” • An independent decision-making State what they think of the proposals. body on heritage, separate from the The proposals focus too much on the YMAC’s co-Chairs Peter Windie and Minister, which includes Traditional approval process for industry and not Mrs. Eaton also sent a similar letter that Owners enough on improving processes for the was widely circulated among YMAC’s effective conservation and protection of stakeholders. • Transparency and accountability in Aboriginal heritage sites.” decision-making The Government acknowledges in the Discussion Paper that there has been • Improved compliance and no formal consultation on the proposed professional standards in assessing changes to date, including with heritage sites and enforcing and Aboriginal people. monitoring their protection Mr Hawkins says “Aboriginal people are • Active preservation and public not just another set of stakeholders. awareness of sites, because This is their heritage and they deserve Aboriginal heritage is important an opportunity to provide meaningful to all Australians, and should be input into the reform process. I am treated as such. sceptical about the current process and The Discussion Paper, along with all of course the short timeframe will not submissions, can be viewed at www.dia. allow for all those negatively affected to wa.gov.au. YMAC’s submission can also have their say.” be found at www.ymac.org.au YMAC lodged a formal submission with Aboriginal heritage sites are under threat in WA news I 6 Agreement focuses on sustainability Ngarlawangga community members, YMAC staff and Rico Resources representatives The Ngarlawangga people of the employment, and business ventures.
Recommended publications
  • Re-Awakening Languages: Theory and Practice in the Revitalisation Of
    RE-AWAKENING LANGUAGES Theory and practice in the revitalisation of Australia’s Indigenous languages Edited by John Hobson, Kevin Lowe, Susan Poetsch and Michael Walsh Copyright Published 2010 by Sydney University Press SYDNEY UNIVERSITY PRESS University of Sydney Library sydney.edu.au/sup © John Hobson, Kevin Lowe, Susan Poetsch & Michael Walsh 2010 © Individual contributors 2010 © Sydney University Press 2010 Reproduction and Communication for other purposes Except as permitted under the Act, no part of this edition may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or communicated in any form or by any means without prior written permission. All requests for reproduction or communication should be made to Sydney University Press at the address below: Sydney University Press Fisher Library F03 University of Sydney NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] Readers are advised that protocols can exist in Indigenous Australian communities against speaking names and displaying images of the deceased. Please check with local Indigenous Elders before using this publication in their communities. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Re-awakening languages: theory and practice in the revitalisation of Australia’s Indigenous languages / edited by John Hobson … [et al.] ISBN: 9781920899554 (pbk.) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Aboriginal Australians--Languages--Revival. Australian languages--Social aspects. Language obsolescence--Australia. Language revival--Australia. iv Copyright Language planning--Australia. Other Authors/Contributors: Hobson, John Robert, 1958- Lowe, Kevin Connolly, 1952- Poetsch, Susan Patricia, 1966- Walsh, Michael James, 1948- Dewey Number: 499.15 Cover image: ‘Wiradjuri Water Symbols 1’, drawing by Lynette Riley. Water symbols represent a foundation requirement for all to be sustainable in their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Inquiry Into Native Title Representative Bodies
    YAMATJI MARLPA BARNA BABA MAAJA ABORIGINAL CORPORATION A Submission to the Inquiry into Native Title Representative Bodies by the NATIVE TITLE AND THE ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER LAND FUND COMMITTEE (JPC 2004/5) from the Yamatji Marlpa Barna Baba Maaja Aboriginal Corporation February 2005 YAMATJI MARLPA BARNA BABA MAAJA ABORIGINAL CORPORATION CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………….….………3 ABOUT YMBBMAC……………………………………………..………………….7 PERFORMANCE………………………………..…………………………………10 FUNDING OF NATIVE TITLE REPRESENTATIVE BODIES…………......19 LIST OF ANNEXURES…………………………………………..……………….27 2 YAMATJI MARLPA BARNA BABA MAAJA ABORIGINAL CORPORATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY KEY POINTS 1. The high standard of work provided by YMBBMAC has led to significant achievements for claimants. 2. Strategically, the organisation aims to build relationships in order to improve outcomes for its clients. Illustrating this, YMBBMAC is a member of the WA Chamber of Minerals and Energy and the WA Chamber of Commerce and Industry. 3. Working groups provide a system of decision-making that is effective, resilient, and has a high degree of community ownership. 4. Funding continues to limit the potential of the organisation. YMBBMAC can improve its performance and achieve agreed outcomes, with additional funding. 5. High level of activity in the Pilbara is demanding considerable resources from the organisation. In order to meet fully the demands of this historic expansion, YMBBMAC requires additional funding. ABOUT YMBBMAC The Yamatji Marlpa Barna Baba Maaja Aboriginal Corporation (YMBBMAC) is the native title representative body (NTRB) for native title claims in the Pilbara, Murchison and Gascoyne representative areas of Western Australia. WORKING GROUPS The use of working groups has set YMBBMAC apart in terms of its ability to operate efficiently, its support from its membership and its ability to produce successful, lasting agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammatical Sketch of Ngarla: a Language of Western Australia Torbjörn Westerlund
    UPPSALA UNIVERSITY master thesis The department for linguistics and philology spring term 2007 A grammatical sketch of Ngarla: A language of Western Australia Torbjörn Westerlund Supervisor: Anju Saxena Abstract In this thesis the basic grammatical structure of normal speech style of the Western Australian language Ngarla is described using example sentences taken from the Ngarla – English Dictionary (by Geytenbeek; unpublished). No previous description of the language exists, and since there are only five people who still speak it, it is of utmost importance that it is investigated and described. The analysis in this thesis has been made by Torbjörn Westerlund, and the focus lies on the morphology of the nominal word class. The preliminary results show that the language shares many grammatical traits with other Australian languages, e.g. the ergative/absolutive case marking pattern. The language also appears to have an extensive verbal inflectional system, and many verbalisers. 2 Abbreviations 0 zero marked morpheme 1 first person 1DU first person dual 1PL first person plural 1SG first person singular 2 second person 2DU second person dual 2PL second person plural 2SG second person singular 3 third person 3DU third person dual 3PL third person plural 3SG third person singular A the transitive subject ABL ablative ACC accusative ALL/ALL2 allative ASP aspect marker BUFF buffer morpheme C consonant CAUS causative COM comitative DAT dative DEM demonstrative DU dual EMPH emphatic marker ERG ergative EXCL exclusive, excluding addressee FACT factitive FUT future tense HORT hortative ImmPAST immediate past IMP imperative INCHO inchoative INCL inclusive, including addressee INSTR instrumental LOC locative NEG negation NMLISER nominaliser NOM nominative N.SUFF nominal class suffix OBSCRD obscured perception P the transitive object p.c.
    [Show full text]
  • AR Radcliffe-Brown]
    P129: The Personal Archives of Alfred Reginald RADCLIFFE-BROWN (1881- 1955), Professor of Anthropology 1926 – 1931 Contents Date Range: 1915-1951 Shelf Metre: 0.16 Accession: Series 2: Gift and deposit register p162 Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown was born on 17 January 1881 at Aston, Warwickshire, England, second son of Alfred Brown, manufacturer's clerk and his wife Hannah, nee Radcliffe. He was educated at King Edward's School, Birmingham, and Trinity College, Cambridge (B.A. 1905, M. A. 1909), graduating with first class honours in the moral sciences tripos. He studied psychology under W. H. R. Rivers, who, with A. C. Haddon, led him towards social anthropology. Elected Anthony Wilkin student in ethnology in 1906 (and 1909), he spent two years in the field in the Andaman Islands. A fellow of Trinity (1908 - 1914), he lectured twice a week on ethnology at the London School of Economics and visited Paris where he met Emily Durkheim. At Cambridge on 19 April 1910 he married Winifred Marie Lyon; they were divorced in 1938. Radcliffe-Brown (then known as AR Brown) joined E. L. Grant Watson and Daisy Bates in an expedition to the North-West of Western Australia studying the remnants of Aboriginal tribes for some two years from 1910, but friction developed between Brown and Mrs. Bates. Brown published his research from that time in an article titled “Three Tribes of Western Australia”, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 43, (Jan. - Jun., 1913), pp. 143-194. At the 1914 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Melbourne, Daisy Bates accused Brown of gross plagiarism.
    [Show full text]
  • Noun Phrase Constituency in Australian Languages: a Typological Study
    Linguistic Typology 2016; 20(1): 25–80 Dana Louagie and Jean-Christophe Verstraete Noun phrase constituency in Australian languages: A typological study DOI 10.1515/lingty-2016-0002 Received July 14, 2015; revised December 17, 2015 Abstract: This article examines whether Australian languages generally lack clear noun phrase structures, as has sometimes been argued in the literature. We break up the notion of NP constituency into a set of concrete typological parameters, and analyse these across a sample of 100 languages, representing a significant portion of diversity on the Australian continent. We show that there is little evidence to support general ideas about the absence of NP structures, and we argue that it makes more sense to typologize languages on the basis of where and how they allow “classic” NP construal, and how this fits into the broader range of construals in the nominal domain. Keywords: Australian languages, constituency, discontinuous constituents, non- configurationality, noun phrase, phrase-marking, phrasehood, syntax, word- marking, word order 1 Introduction It has often been argued that Australian languages show unusual syntactic flexibility in the nominal domain, and may even lack clear noun phrase struc- tures altogether – e. g., in Blake (1983), Heath (1986), Harvey (2001: 112), Evans (2003a: 227–233), Campbell (2006: 57); see also McGregor (1997: 84), Cutfield (2011: 46–50), Nordlinger (2014: 237–241) for overviews and more general dis- cussion of claims to this effect. This idea is based mainly on features
    [Show full text]
  • Extract from Hansard [ASSEMBLY
    Extract from Hansard [ASSEMBLY — Wednesday, 19 August 2015] p5601b-5631a Mr Peter Tinley; Mr Ian Blayney; Mr Bill Johnston; Mr Murray Cowper; Mr Fran Logan; Ms Mia Davies; Mr Dave Kelly; Mr John McGrath; Mrs Michelle Roberts; Ms Janine Freeman; Mr David Templeman; Ms Margaret Quirk; Mr Ian Britza; Ms Lisa Baker; Mr Peter Watson; Mr Mick Murray; Mr Chris Tallentire; Mr Terry Waldron; Mr John Castrilli; Mr Paul Papalia; Mrs Liza Harvey; Ms Josie Farrer CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT (RECOGNITION OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLE) BILL 2015 Second Reading Resumed from an earlier stage of the sitting. MR P.C. TINLEY (Willagee) [2.50 pm]: I rise to conclude my brief contribution on the historic Constitution Amendment (Recognition of Aboriginal People) Bill 2015. Without rehashing it, for the benefit of anybody who was not in the chamber at the time I characterised the Aboriginal contribution to military service in Western Australia and Australia as being a significant contribution to progressing the identity of both Aboriginal people and non-Aboriginal people in creating a unified culture. I also noted with some gratitude that symbolism is important. The opening quote that I used was “If you change the way you look at things, the things you look at will change.” I believe that we have progressed even in the time of this Parliament to being on the cusp of delivering a significant substantive arrangement beyond symbolism for the Indigenous land use agreements with the Noongar people at the National Native Title Tribunal. We look forward to making a substantive contribution to reconciliation beyond just the symbolism.
    [Show full text]
  • ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES of the GASCOYNE-ASHBURTON REGION Peter Austin 1
    ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES OF THE GASCOYNE-ASHBURTON REGION Peter Austin 1. INTRODUCTION1 This paper is a description of the language situation in the region between the Gascoyne and Ashburton Rivers in the north-west of Western Australia. At the time of first white settlement in the region, there were eleven languages spoken between the two rivers, several of them in a number of dialect forms. Research on languages of the locality has taken place mainly in the past thirty years, after a long period of neglect, but details of the past and present linguistic situation have been emerging as a result of that research. The paper includes an annotated bibliography of the Aboriginal languages traditionally spoken in the area 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The first explorations by Europeans in the north-west of Western Australia were maritime voyages concerned with coastal exploration. As early as 1818, Captain P.P. King had reported on the coast east of Exmouth Gulf and between 1838 and 1841 Captains Wickham and Stokes had discovered the mouth of the Ashburton River (Webb & Webb 1983:12). On 5th March 1839 Lieutenant George Grey came upon the mouth of the Gascoyne River and during his explorations encountered Aborigines. He reported that (Brown 1972:83): “they spoke a dialect very closely resembling that of the natives of the Swan River”. Further contact between Gascoyne-Ashburton language speakers and Europeans came in the 1850’s with inland explorations. In 1858 Francis Gregory explored the Gascoyne River and the Lyons River north as far as Mount Augustus (Green 1981:97-8, Webb & Webb 1983:11, Brown 1972:86).
    [Show full text]
  • Wajarri Yamatji Achieve Native Title Recognition
    Geraldton | Hedland | Perth www.ymac.org.au Wajarri Yamatji Achieve Native Title Recognition MEDIA RELEASE: 20 October 2017 Photo: Wajarri people proudly showing their consent determination The Wajarri Yamatji community celebrates the legal recognition of their land and culture at an on-Country Federal Court hearing at Wooleen Station, held on Thursday 19 October 2017. The celebration was facilitated by Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation (YMAC), the Native Title Representative Body for the Murchison and Gascoyne Region. The consent determination covers the majority of the Wajarri Yamatji claim area (68,743 square kilometres of the total 97,676 square kilometres). The area encompasses parts of the Shires of Meekatharra, Mount Magnet, Murchison, Upper Gascoyne, Cue and Yalgoo; as well as 56 pastoral leases. Lvl 8 12-14 The Esplanade Perth WA | PO Box 3072 249 Hay St Perth WA 6892 T (08) 9268 7000 | F (08) 9225 4633 | ABN 14 011 921 883 | ICN 2001 Geraldton | Hedland | Perth www.ymac.org.au The Wajarri Yamatji claim area is roughly 500 km wide, north to south and lies between the regional towns of Meekatharra, Cue, Yalgoo and just north of Mullewa. The area encompasses Mt Augustus (Burringurrah) and stretches of the Murchison and Gascoyne Rivers. In 2009, the Wajarri Yamatji, the State of Western Australia and the Commonwealth government entered into the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory Agreement, which has led to the development of the Murchison Widefield Array and the Australian Square Kilometre Array (SKA) Pathfinder as SKA precursor telescopes. The journey to this native title determination commenced in 1995 and has involved the coming together of many families to achieve native title recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Yamaji Knowledge Education Resource for Schools May 2018
    Sharing Yamaji Knowledge Education resource for schools May 2018 This resource has been developed for the Northern Agricultural Catchments Council (NACC) by Kate Naughtin with editing support by Patrick Witton. Copyright NACC 2018. Reproduction of this publication (with the exception of photographs) for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorised subject to advance written notification to NACC along with appropriate acknowledgement. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without NACC’s prior written permission. Reproduction of the photos for any purpose is subject to NACC’s and the photo author’s prior written permission. NACC Education Resource | Sharing Yamaji Knowledge 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THE YAMAJI PEOPLE This project acknowledges the Yamaji1 people and recognises Aboriginal people as Australia’s first natural resource managers. The Yamaji people have developed, refined and employed knowledge of the natural environment for tens of thousands of years, and this knowledge has been passed down from generation to generation. This traditional ecological knowledge is extremely valuable in enhancing the ways we care for our environment. Yamaji community members have generously shared their knowledge in the development of this resource, so that school-aged students will better understand Aboriginal culture, the environment and the importance of caring for it. Without the valuable contribution of the Yamaji community, this project would not have been possible. We thank them for sharing their time and expertise for this project. RESOURCE DESIGN The artwork featured in this resource is titled Dreamtime by Amangu Artist Wayne Ronan. Wayne explains the significance of his work: ‘The circles represent the ocean and rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo Iouo
    Oceania No. Language [ISO 639-3 Code] Country (Region) 1 ’Are’are [alu] Iouo Solomon Islands 2 ’Auhelawa [kud] Iouo Papua New Guinea 3 Abadi [kbt] Iouo Papua New Guinea 4 Abaga [abg] Iouo Papua New Guinea 5 Abau [aau] Iouo Papua New Guinea 6 Abom [aob] Iouo Papua New Guinea 7 Abu [ado] Iouo Papua New Guinea 8 Adnyamathanha [adt] Iouo Australia 9 Adzera [adz] Iouo Papua New Guinea 10 Aeka [aez] Iouo Papua New Guinea 11 Aekyom [awi] Iouo Papua New Guinea 12 Agarabi [agd] Iouo Papua New Guinea 13 Agi [aif] Iouo Papua New Guinea 14 Agob [kit] Iouo Papua New Guinea 15 Aighon [aix] Iouo Papua New Guinea 16 Aiklep [mwg] Iouo Papua New Guinea 17 Aimele [ail] Iouo Papua New Guinea 18 Ainbai [aic] Iouo Papua New Guinea 19 Aiome [aki] Iouo Papua New Guinea 20 Äiwoo [nfl] Iouo Solomon Islands 21 Ajië [aji] Iouo New Caledonia 22 Ak [akq] Iouo Papua New Guinea 23 Akei [tsr] Iouo Vanuatu 24 Akolet [akt] Iouo Papua New Guinea 25 Akoye [miw] Iouo Papua New Guinea 26 Akukem [spm] Iouo Papua New Guinea 27 Alamblak [amp] Iouo Papua New Guinea 28 Alawa [alh] Iouo Australia 29 Alekano [gah] Iouo Papua New Guinea 30 Alyawarr [aly] Iouo Australia 31 Ama [amm] Iouo Papua New Guinea 32 Amaimon [ali] Iouo Papua New Guinea 33 Amal [aad] Iouo Papua New Guinea 34 Amanab [amn] Iouo Papua New Guinea 35 Amara [aie] Iouo Papua New Guinea 36 Amba [utp] Iouo Solomon Islands 37 Ambae, East [omb] Iouo Vanuatu 38 Ambae, West [nnd] Iouo Vanuatu 39 Ambakich [aew] Iouo Papua New Guinea 40 Amblong [alm] Iouo Vanuatu 1 Oceania No.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Indigenous Languages in Australia 2001 / by Patrick Mcconvell, Nicholas Thieberger
    State of Indigenous languages in Australia - 2001 by Patrick McConvell Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Nicholas Thieberger The University of Melbourne November 2001 Australia: State of the Environment Second Technical Paper Series No. 2 (Natural and Cultural Heritage) Environment Australia, part of the Department of the Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those listed above requires the written permission of the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the State of the Environment Reporting Section, Environment Australia, GPO Box 787, Canberra ACT 2601. The Commonwealth accepts no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this document, or the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document. The Commonwealth will not be liable for any loss or damage occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this document. Environment Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication McConvell, Patrick State of Indigenous Languages in Australia 2001 / by Patrick McConvell, Nicholas Thieberger. (Australia: State of the Environment Second Technical Paper Series (No.1 Natural and Cultural Heritage)) Bibliography ISBN 064 254 8714 1. Aboriginies, Australia-Languages. 2. Torres Strait Islanders-Languages. 3. Language obsolescence. I. Thieberger, Nicholas. II. Australia. Environment Australia. III. Series 499.15-dc21 For bibliographic purposes, this document may be cited as: McConvell, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Parliamentary Question 7382 [Tabled Paper No ] (1-2)
    Legislative Assembly Parliamentary Question 7382 [Tabled Paper No ________________] (1-2) STATUS OF CONNECTION REPORTS State Research Additional Assessment: Claim NTRB/NTSP Received material Comments Finalised/ received Unresolved 1 Nyiyaparli Yamatji Land and 31 January 2012 Unresolved First instalment of connection material has been provided by the applicant, additional information Sea Council (PNTS) is to be provided. 2 Yinhawangka Part A Yamatji Land and 1 November 2011 Unresolved Currently being assessed. Sea Council (PNTS) 3 Yinhawangka Part B Yamatji Land and 1 November 2011 Unresolved Currently being assessed. Sea Council (PNTS) 4 Ngurrara Part B Kimberley Land 1 July 2011 August 2011 Finalised Cabinet approved consent determination June 2011, subject to occupation evidence which was Council provided in July and August 2011. 5 Wajarri Yamatji Yamatji Land and 1 December 2010 Due July 2012 Unresolved Applicants advised of State view on the evidence. Sea Council 6 Nyangumarta (Part Yamatji Land and 30 September Finalised Cabinet approved consent determination June 2011, subject to clarity on the Prescribed Body B)/Yawinya Sea Council (PNTS) 2010 Corporate. 7 Martu Idja Bunjima/ Yamatji Land and 1 July 2010 August 2010, Finalised Claims discontinued 2011. New Banjima claim filed. Currently in trial. Innawonga Bunjima Sea Council (PNTS) September 2010 8 Kurrama Yamatji Land and 1 March 2010 Unresolved State is unable to assess the connection material until the overlap with the Yaburarra Marthudunera Sea Council (PNTS) Mardhudunera claim is resolved. 9 Putu Kunti Kurrama & Yamatji Land and 1 October 2009 Unresolved In mediation. Initial assessment provided 2011. Pinikura #1 Sea Council (PNTS) 10 Putu Kunti Kurrama & Yamatji Land and 1 October 2009 Unresolved In mediation.
    [Show full text]