DOCSLIB.ORG

00 Tabak N.Vp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
00 Tabak N.Vp ZBORNIK RADOVA VIZANTOLO[KOG INSTITUTA HßÇH UDC 949.5+7.033.2+877.3(05) ISSN 0584–9888 INSTITUT D’ÉTUDES BYZANTINES DE L’ACADÉMIE SERBE DES SCIENCES ET DES ARTS RECUEIL DES TRAVAUX DE L’INSTITUT D’ÉTUDES BYZANTINES XßÇX Rédacteur LJUBOMIR MAKSIMOVI] Directeur de l’Institut d’études byzantines Comité de rédaction Jean-Claude Cheynet (Paris), Evangelos Chrysos (Athenes), Vujadin Ivani{evi}, Jovanka Kali}, Sergej Karpov (Moscou), Bojana Krsmanovi}, Aleksandar Loma, Ljubomir Maksimovi}, Miodrag Markovi}, Claudia Rapp (Vienne), Peter Schreiner (Munich), Gojko Suboti}, Mirjana @ivojinovi} Secretaires de la redaction Dejan D`elebd`i}, Predrag Komatina BEOGRAD 2012 UDK 949.5+7.033.2+877.3(05) ISSN 0584–9888 VIZANTOLO[KI INSTITUT SRPSKE AKADEMIJE NAUKA I UMETNOSTI ZBORNIK RADOVA VIZANTOLO[KOG INSTITUTA XßÇX Urednik QUBOMIR MAKSIMOVI] direktor Vizantolo{kog instituta Redakcioni odbor Mirjana @ivojinovi}, Vujadin Ivani{evi}, Jovanka Kali}, Sergej Karpov (Moskva), Bojana Krsmanovi}, Aleksandar Loma, Qubomir Maksimovi}, Miodrag Markovi}, Klaudija Rap (Be~), Gojko Suboti}, Evangelos Hrisos (Atina), @an-Klod [ene (Pariz), Peter [rajner (Minhen) Sekretari redakcije Dejan Xelebxi}, Predrag Komatina BEOGRAD 2012 Prihva}eno za {tampu na sednici Odeqewa istorijskih nauka SANU, 28. novembra 2012. godine. Ova kwiga objavqena je uz finansijsku pomo} Ministarstva prosvete, nauke i tehnolo{kog razvoja Republike Srbije SADR@AJ — TABLE DES MATIERES Miroslava Mirkovi}, Co-regency: Constantine and Licinivs and the political division of the Balkans --------------------------- 7 Miroslava Mirkovi}, Savladari: Konstantin i Licinije i podela Balkanskog poluostrva 17 Milo{ Cvetkovi}, Ukqu~ivawe Slovena i Vlaha u sistem vizantijske provin- cijske organizacije na jugu Balkana do XI veka. Sli~nosti i razlike - - - 19 Milo{ Cvetkovi}, The Slavs and Vlachs in the Byzantine system of provincial organiza- tion in the Southern Balkans until the XI century. Similarities and differencies 39 Valerio Massimo Minale, About the reception of the Isaurian Ekloge in Byzantine Italy: an effort of comparison with the Slavian world and mainly Stefan Du{an’s Serbian Empire ------------------------- 43 Valerio Masimo Minale, O recepciji isavrijanske Ekloge u vizantijskoj Itali- ji: poku{aj pore|ewa sa slovenskim svetom i posebno sa Srpskim carstvom StefanaDu{ana------------------------ 73 Bojan Novakovi}, Dukqa u spisu De administrando imperio --------- 75 Bojan Novakovi}, Dioclea in De administrando imperio ----------- 85 Bojana Krsmanovi}, Zna~aj Atona i Ohridske arhiepiskopije u politici Vasi- lija II naBalkanu------------------------ 87 Bojana Krsmanovi}, The importance of Mount Athos and the Ohrid Archbishopric for thepolicyofBasilIIintheBalkans----------------- 111 Frederick Lauritzen, Autocrate negli encomi imperiali di Michele Psello (1018–1081) 113 Frederik Lauricen, Avtokrator u panegiricima Mihaila Psela (1018–1081) - - 124 Jasmina [aranac Stamenkovi}, Konstantin X Duka u carskom govoru Mihaila Psela----------------------------- 127 Jasmina [aranac Stamenkovi}, Constantine X Doukas in an enkomion by Michael Psellos ---------------------------- 142 Antonios Vratimos, In the Chronographia, is Michael Psellos’ concern for the army en- tirely disinterested? ----------------------- 145 Andonios Vratimos, Da li Pselova zainteresovanost za vojsku u Hronografiji uop{tenijemotivisanali~nimrazlozima?------------- 157 Predrag Komatina,SrbijaiDukqaudeluJovanaSkilice--------- 159 Predrag Komatina, SerbiaandDiocleaintheworkofJohnSkylitzes------ 184 Relja Seferovi}, Ljepota dijaloga. Rasprave gr~kih i latinskih teologa u vrijeme Kom- nena iz zapadne perspektive -------------------- 187 Relja Seferovi}, The beauty of dialog. The disputes between the Greek and Latin theologians in the period of the Komnenoi from the western perspective - - - 211 Dragana Pavlovi}, Kult i ikonografija dvojice svetih Andreja sa Krita - - - 213 Dragana Pavlovi}, Le culte et l’iconographie des deux St. Andre de Crete---- 239 Savvas Kyriakidis, The idea of civil war in thirteenth and fourteenth-century — Byzantium 243 Savas Kiriakidis,Idejaogra|anskomratuuVizantiji13.i14.veka---- 255 Bojana Pavlovi},SrbiudelimaDimitrijaKidona------------ 257 Bojana Pavlovi}, Serbs in the works of Demetrios Cydones ---------- 296 Marka Tomi} \uri}, The man of sorrows and the lamenting Virgin: the example at Markov manastir ------------------------ 303 Marka Tomi} \uri}, Mrtvi Hristos i Pla~ Bogorodi~in u Markovom manastiru 330 Tatjana Starodubcev, O portretima u Ravanici ------------- 333 Tatjana Starodubcev, On portraits in Ravanica --------------- 353 Bojan Miqkovi},SrpskipanagijarizVatopeda------------- 355 Bojan Miljkovi}, The Serbian panagiarion from Vatopedi ----------- 363 Maja Nikoli}, H tou Qeou dia twn arcontwn promhqeia — vizantijski arhonti XV vekaireligioznezadu`bine.Dvaprimera------------ 365 Maja Nikoli}, H tou Qeou dia twn arcontwn promhqeia — Byzantine 15th century archontes and religious endowments. Two examples ----------- 384 Zbornik radova Vizantolo{kog instituta HßÇH, 2012 Recueil des travaux de l’Institut d’etudes byzantines XßIX, 2012 UDC: 94:321.18Š(37)"03" DOI:10.2298/ZRVI1249007M MIROSLAVA MIRKOVI] (Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade) CO-REGENCY: CONSTANTINE AND LICINIVS AND THE POLITICAL DIVISION OF THE BALKANS In the agreement which followed the first war between Constantine and Lici- nius and Constantine’s victory on the Campus Ardiensis, Licinius was forced, as generally accepted, to surrender Illyricum where he was undisputed ruler until 316. However he was not neutralized politically and reigned together with Constantine between AD 316 and 324. Some kind of division of the sphere of interest seems to have existed between them. Constantine, whose movements in the Balkans are known from the places of editing laws, visited only the western half, i.e. Illyricum after 316. If we follow the evidence of the places and dates of the promulgation of Constantine’s laws, we can consider the line dividing the region controlled by Constantine and that under Licinius’ command, running from the North to the South and leaving Constantine the Pannonian provinces, Moesia I, Dacia Ripensis, Dacia Mediterranea and Dardania, as well as Macedonia, with the legionary camps on the Danube in Pannonia and Moesia I; the provinces on the East of that line, Moesia II, Scythia Minor and Thracia belonged to the region in which Licinius had command. However, there is evidence indicating that the territorial division of the Balkans be- tween Constantine and Licinius after the battle of Cibalae was not strictly observed except on the Danube, in the zone where the military camps were located. In spite of Constantine’s presence in Illyricum, Licinius’s influence on the high commanders on the Danube never disappeared nor did his presence in the provinces he lost after the Bellum Cibalense. Licinius had the jubilee silver plates made for his decennalia in Naissus in Dacia Mediterranea. The siver plates which have been produced in Naissus, in the part of the Balkans which was under Constantine’s control, bear the inscription LICINI AVGVSTE SEMPER VINCAS. The co-operation between Constantine and Licinius concerned the defense of the frontiers and the administra- tion in both parts of the Empire, but it was not based on the subordination of one to another as it was in the time of Diocletian who created the system tetrarchy. Key words: co-regency, Constantine, Licinius, battle of Cibalae, Licinius’ decennalia, silver plates from Naissus, territorial division between Augusti and Caesares. 8 ZRVI XLIX (2012) 7–18 The struggle between Constantine and Licinius was fought for supremacy in the military command in Illyricum. Licinius became the undisputed ruler in the vast region which encompassed all of the Danube provinces after Galerius’ death in AD 311. From 311 to 316 the huge military forces on the Danube frontier from Vindobona to the Black Sea were under his command. He gained control of Asia Minor and the East by defeating Maximinus Daza in 313. Constantine came to power after his father’s death, by being proclaimed Augustus by the army in Britain. He inherited his father’s rank, position, army and the task of defending the fron- tiers in Britain, Gaul and Spain, but he would never be satisfied with being Au- gustus only in the western half of the Empire. His next step was to defeat other rulers and to be recognized in other parts of the Empire. He moved his troops fur- ther from Gaul and invaded Italy first where Maxentius, the son of Maximianus, had seized power. Constantine crushed Maxentius’ forces on the Pons Milvii in Rome in 312 and established control over Italy. From the military point of view it was not a great victory. The best army was located on the Danube under the com- mand of Licinius. If Constantine wanted to gain control of the frontier on the Dan- ube with its military strength camped here, it was necessary to neutralize Licinius in Illyricum. Constantine’s relationship with Licinius was initially a friendly one. He met him in Milan in 313 and after making the agreement about the tolerance of the Christians, Licinius’ marriage with Constantine’s sister was celebrated. Their posi- tions were unequal. Licinius retained his predominance in the balance of power since he had command over the massive military forces on the Danube. This rep- resented the main obstacle to Constantine in his aspiration to be the sole ruler in the Empire. The first disagreement between Constantine and Licinius was provoked by Constantine’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biblical Trinity Doctrine and Christology Translation of L
    Ludwig Neidhart: Biblical Trinity Doctrine and Christology translation of L. Neidhart, Biblische Trinitätslehre und Christologie, published on http://catholic-church.org/ao/ps/Trinitaet.html, 2017, translated by the author, published online on http://catholic-church.org/ao/ps/downloads/TrinityChristology.pdf, 2017, © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Hannover 1990 (original German Version), © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Augsburg 2017 (extended German Version and English translation, both issued on September 15, 2017) Contents: 1. Unity in Essence and Personal Distinction between Father and Son.......................................................3 2. The Unity in Essence between the Father and the Son: Ten Biblical Arguments...................................8 3. The Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost...................................................................................................................18 4. The Triune God...........................................................................................................................................21 5. Trinity and Incarnation..............................................................................................................................29 6. Development of the Doctrine of Trinity and Incarnation.......................................................................31 7. Summary and Graphic Presentation of the Concepts of Trinity and Incarnation...............................48 8. Discussion: Is the Son subordinated to the Father?................................................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • A Letter to Pope Francis Concerning His Past, the Abysmal State of Papism, and a Plea to Return to Holy Orthodoxy
    A Letter to Pope Francis Concerning His Past, the Abysmal State of Papism, and a Plea to Return to Holy Orthodoxy The lengthy letter that follows was written by His Eminence, the Metropolitan of Piraeus, Seraphim, and His Eminence, the Metropolitan of Dryinoupolis, Andrew, both of the Church of Greece. It was sent to Pope Francis on April 10, 2014. The Orthodox Christian Information Center (OrthodoxInfo.com) assisted in editing the English translation. It was posted on OrthodoxInfo.com on Great and Holy Monday, April 14, 2014. The above title was added for the English version and did not appear in the Greek text. Metropolitan Seraphim is well known and loved in Greece for his defense of Orthodoxy, his strong stance against ecumenism, and for the philanthropic work carried out in his Metropolis (http://www.imp.gr/). His Metropolis is also well known for Greece’s first and best ecclesiastical radio station: http://www.pe912fm.com/. This radio station is one of the most important tools for Orthodox outreach in Greece. Metropolitan Seraphim was born in 1956 in Athens. He studied law and theology, receiving his master’s degree and his license to practice law. In 1980 he was tonsured a monk and ordained to the holy diaconate and the priesthood by His Beatitude Seraphim of blessed memory, Archbishop of Athens and All Greece. He served as the rector of various churches and as the head ecclesiastical judge for the Archdiocese of Athens (1983) and as the Secretary of the Synodal Court of the Church of Greece (1985-2000). In December of 2000 the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarch elected him as an auxiliary bishop of the Holy Archdiocese of Australia in which he served until 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Trinity Doctrine and Christology Translation of L
    Ludwig Neidhart: Biblical Trinity Doctrine and Christology translation of L. Neidhart, Biblische Trinitätslehre und Christologie, published online on http://catholic-church.org/ao/ps/Trinitaet.html, translated by the author, published online on http://catholic-church.org/ao/ps/downloads/TrinityChristology.pdf © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Hannover 1990 (original German Version) © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Augsburg 2017 (extended German Version and English translation) corrected and extended Version January 09, 2021 Contents: 1. Unity in Essence and Personal Distinction between Father and Son......................................................3 2. The Unity in Essence between the Father and the Son: Ten Biblical Arguments..................................8 3. The Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost..................................................................................................................18 4. The Triune God..........................................................................................................................................21 5. Trinity and Incarnation.............................................................................................................................29 6. Development of the Doctrine of Trinity and Incarnation......................................................................31 7. Summary and Graphic Presentation of the Concepts of Trinity and Incarnation..............................48 8. Discussion: Is the Son subordinated to the Father?...............................................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • Paul MAGDALINO Domaines De Recherche Adresse Personnelle
    Paul MAGDALINO Professeur émérite de l’Université de St Andrews (Ecosse) Distinguished Research Professor, Koç University, Istanbul Membre de l’Académie Britannique Domaines de recherche Culture littéraire et religieuse de Constantinople Mentalités et représentation du pouvoir Urbanisme métropolitain et provincial Adresse personnelle 2 route de Volage, 01420, Corbonod, France Tél. 04 57 05 10 54 Curriculum vitae Né le 10 mai 1948 Etudes à Oxford, 1967-1977 Doctorat (DPhil) 1977 Enseignant (Maître de conférences, professeur associé, professeur), University of Saint Andrews, 1977-2009 Professeur à l’Université Koç d’Istanbul, 2004-2008 et 2010-2014 Fellow à Dumbarton Oaks, 1974-1975, 1994, 2013, 2015 Andrew Mellon Fellow, Catholic University of America, 1976-1977 A. v. Humboldt- Stipendiat, Frankfurt (1980-1981), Munich (1983), Berlin (2013) Professeur invité, Harvard University, 1995-1996 Directeur d’études invité, EPHE (1997, 2007), EHESS (2005) Chercheur invité à Dumbarton Oaks, 2006 Membre de l’Académie britannique depuis 2002 Membre correspondant de l’Institut de recherches byzantines de l’Université de Thessalonique (depuis 2010) Comités scientifiques et éditoriaux 1992 –Collection 'The Medieval Mediterranean', Brill 1993– Committee for the British Academy project on the Prosopography of the Byzantine Empire. 2001–7 Senior Fellows Committee, Dumbarton Oaks, Program in Byzantine Studies 2002 – Collection ‘Oxford Studies in Byzantium', Oxford University Press. 2006- La Pomme d’or, Geneva, chief editor 2007 – Comoité editorial de la revue Byzantinische Zeitschrift 2013-2014 – Editorial board of Koç University Press Publications Ouvrages 1976 (en collaboration avec Clive Foss) Rome and Byzantium (Oxford, 1976) 1991 Tradition and Transformation in Medieval Byzantium (Aldershot 1992) 1993 The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos, 1143-1180 (Cambridge, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Carolyn S. Snively
    Ni{ i Vizantija V 55 Carolyn S. Snively THESSALONIKI VERSUS JUSTINIANA PRIMA: A RARE MENTION OF THE CONFLICT, IN THE LIFE OF OSIOS DAVID OF THESSALONIKI1 The northern half of the Prefecture of Eastern Illyricum, that is, the Diocese of Dacia, was not so densely urbanized as the southern half. In Late Antiquity the city of Naissus, known for its historical connections with Constantine, was the major city within a rather wide region. Serdica (modern Sofi a), the capital of the province of Dacia Mediterranea, lay ca. 150 km to the southeast, Ulpiana ca. 100 km to the southwest Thus, in the third or fourth decade of the 6th century, when a new city began to rise at Caričin Grad only ca. 45 km distant, Naissus was undoubtedly affected, for good or ill. Assuming that the new city at Caričin Grad was in fact Justiniana Prima, built to honor the birthplace of the emperor Justinian, we can interpret the 30-40 years of building as lasting more or less until the death of Justinian in 565 AD. Since very little is known about the origin of the people who worked and lived at Caričin Grad, it is possible that a number of the con- struction workers and other settlers for the new foundation were recruited from the nearest major city, i.e., from Naissus. Although, to the best of our knowledge, Justiniana Prima did not ever become the capital city of the Prefecture of Eastern Illyricum, the presence of civil and military authorities and the establishment of the new archbishopric point to changes in the previous balance of power within the Diocese of Dacia.
    [Show full text]
  • Dositheos Notaras, the Patriarch of Jerusalem (1669-1707), Confronts the Challenges of Modernity
    IN SEARCH OF A CONFESSIONAL IDENTITY: DOSITHEOS NOTARAS, THE PATRIARCH OF JERUSALEM (1669-1707), CONFRONTS THE CHALLENGES OF MODERNITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Christopher George Rene IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Adviser Theofanis G. Stavrou SEPTEMBER 2020 © Christopher G Rene, September 2020 i Acknowledgements Without the steadfast support of my teachers, family and friends this dissertation would not have been possible, and I am pleased to have the opportunity to express my deep debt of gratitude and thank them all. I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, who together guided me through to the completion of this dissertation. My adviser Professor Theofanis G. Stavrou provided a resourceful outlet by helping me navigate through administrative channels and stay on course academically. Moreover, he fostered an inviting space for parrhesia with vigorous dialogue and intellectual tenacity on the ideas of identity, modernity, and the role of Patriarch Dositheos. It was in fact Professor Stavrou who many years ago at a Slavic conference broached the idea of an Orthodox Commonwealth that inspired other academics and myself to pursue the topic. Professor Carla Phillips impressed upon me the significance of daily life among the people of Europe during the early modern period (1450-1800). As Professor Phillips’ teaching assistant for a number of years, I witnessed lectures that animated the historical narrative and inspired students to question their own unique sense of historical continuity and discontinuities. Thank you, Professor Phillips, for such a pedagogical example.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantium's Balkan Frontier
    This page intentionally left blank Byzantium’s Balkan Frontier is the first narrative history in English of the northern Balkans in the tenth to twelfth centuries. Where pre- vious histories have been concerned principally with the medieval history of distinct and autonomous Balkan nations, this study regards Byzantine political authority as a unifying factor in the various lands which formed the empire’s frontier in the north and west. It takes as its central concern Byzantine relations with all Slavic and non-Slavic peoples – including the Serbs, Croats, Bulgarians and Hungarians – in and beyond the Balkan Peninsula, and explores in detail imperial responses, first to the migrations of nomadic peoples, and subsequently to the expansion of Latin Christendom. It also examines the changing conception of the frontier in Byzantine thought and literature through the middle Byzantine period. is British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow, Keble College, Oxford BYZANTIUM’S BALKAN FRONTIER A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, – PAUL STEPHENSON British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow Keble College, Oxford The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org © Paul Stephenson 2004 First published in printed format 2000 ISBN 0-511-03402-4 eBook (Adobe Reader) ISBN 0-521-77017-3 hardback Contents List ofmaps and figurespagevi Prefacevii A note on citation and transliterationix List ofabbreviationsxi Introduction .Bulgaria and beyond:the Northern Balkans (c.–) .The Byzantine occupation ofBulgaria (–) .Northern nomads (–) .Southern Slavs (–) .The rise ofthe west,I:Normans and Crusaders (–) .
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARDS the MACEDONIAN RENAISSANCE (Macedonian Textbooks of the Nineteenth Century)
    INSTITUTE OF NATIONAL HISTORY TOWARDS THE MACEDONIAN RENAISSANCE (Macedonian Textbooks of the Nineteenth Century) by BLAZE KONESKI SKOPJE - 1961 CONTENTS Introduction Macedonian Text-books of the Nineteenth Century The Activities of Parteni Zografski Kuzman Sapkarev and other Followers of Parteni Zografski The Macedonist G'org'i (G'orgo) Pulevski Conclusion I INTRODUCTION 1 In this work the Macedonian Renaissance is viewed from one particular aspect - that of the appearance of Macedonian text-books in the course of the last century. This is in the foreground. The work is concerned with textbooks which were: 1) Compiled by Macedonians and published between1857 and 1880. 2) Written in Macedonian or with many elements of the language of our people. 3) Used in Macedonian schools or generally among the people (e.g. for self- education). We mention a total of sixteen such books by the following writers: Parteni Zografski, Kuzman Šapkarev, Dimitar V. Makedonski and Gjorgji Pulevski. The period of their publication is an especially important and interesting one for our new national history. It was the time when, though still in embryo, some of the basic historical factors which were later to influence our further national development were emerging. The publication of Macedonian text-books together with their use in schools, reflecting, as it does, the independent development of the Macedonian people, represents for us an important cultural and historical phenomenon. Interest in them is, therefore, not restricted solely to surveying them from the linguistic and pedagogical viewpoint. It is directed first of all to the question: what does the publication of these text-books reveal of our national development about the middle of the last century and later.
    [Show full text]
  • Sirmium in Justinian I's Politics
    Piotrków Historical Annales, 2020, Special Issue, pp. 29-49 www.ihpt.pl/pzh DOI: 10.25951/4216 Stanisław Turlej https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-9139 Jagiellonian University e-mail: [email protected] Sirmium in Justinian I’s Politics Sirmium w polityce Justyniana I Abstract In Late Antiquity, Sirmium on the Sava River in Pannonia was undoubt- edly the most important and famous city of the Roman Empire in the Danubi- an territories. An analysis of the Emperor’s novels devoted to Justiniana Prima (XI and CXXXI, 3), the works of Procopius of Caesarea, Cassiodorus and Hi- erocles’ geographical work provides a lot of important information about the functioning of this centre and the situation in the Danubian region, but not about Sirmium’s great significance to Justinian. There is no basis in the sources for crediting the Emperor with plans or actual political and military actions dictated solely by the desire to capture this city. Abstrakt W późnym antyku Sirmium nad Sawą w Panonii było niewątpliwie najważniejszym i najsłynniejszym miastem cesarstwa rzymskiego na obszarach naddunajskich. Analiza nowel cesarza Justyniana poświęconych Justynianie Primie (XI i CXXXI, 3), twórczości Prokopiusza z Cezarei, Kasjodora oraz dzieła geograficznego Hieroklesa dostarcza wielu ważnych informacji o funk- cjonowaniu tego ośrodka i sytuacji w regionie naddunajskim, lecz nie o wielkim 30 Stanisław Turlej znaczeniu Sirmium dla Justyniana. Nie ma podstaw źródłowych, by przypisywać cesarzowi plany bądź realne działania polityczne i militarne podyktowane wyłącznie chęcią zajęcia tego miasta. Keywords: Sirmium, Pannonia, Justiniana Prima, Justinian I, Procopius of Caesarea, Cassiodor, Hierocles Słowa kluczowe: Sirmium, Panonia, Justynian I, Justyniana Prima, Prokopiusz z Cezarei, Kasjodor, Hierokles n the 6th century there were many military conflicts related to a city which Iwas important in late antiquity – Sirmium on the Sava River in Pannonia1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download List of Digitised Manuscripts Hyperlinks, July 2016
    ms_shelfmark ms_title ms_dm_link Add Ch 54148 Bull of Pope Alexander III relating to Kilham, http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_Ch_54148&index=0 Yorkshire Add Ch 76659 Confirmations by the Patriarch of http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?index=0&ref=Add_Ch_76659 Constantinople of the stavropegiacal rights of the Monastery of Theotokos Chrysopodariotissa near Kalanos, in the province of Patras in the Peloponnese Add Ch 76660 Confirmations by the Patriarch of http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?index=0&ref=Add_Ch_76660 Constantinople of the stavropegiacal rights of the Monastery of Theotokos Chrysopodariotissa near Kalanos, in the province of Patras in the Peloponnese Add MS 10014 Works of Macarius Alexandrinus, John http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_10014 Chrysostom and others Add MS 10016 Pseudo-Nonnus; Maximus the Peloponnesian; http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_10016 Hilarion Kigalas Add MS 10017 History of Roman Jurisprudence during the http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_10017 Middle Ages, translated into Modern Greek Add MS 10022 Procopius of Gaza, Commentary on Genesis http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_10022 Add MS 10023 Procopius of Gaza, Commentary on the http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_10023 Octateuch Add MS 10024 Vikentios Damodos, On Metaphysics http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_10024 Add MS 10040 Aristotle, Categoriae and other works with http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_10040
    [Show full text]
  • 082:312 Byzantine Art Spring 2008
    01:082:312 BYZANTINE ART SPRING 2019 Required Text: Robin Cormack Byzantine Art (Oxford 2018). Recommended Reading: (on the Reserve Reading shelf in the Art Library) Charles Barber Figure and Likeness: On the Limits of Representation in Byzantine Iconoclasm (Princeton 2002). Peter Brown The World of Late Antiquity (New York 1989). Jas Elsner Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph (Oxford 1998). John Haldon Byzantium in the Seventh Century: the Transformation of a Culture (Cambridge 1997). Romilly Jenkins Byzantium: The Imperial Centuries A.D. 610-1071 (New York 1969). Ernst Kitzinger Byzantine Art in the Making (London 1977). John Lowden Early Christian and Byzantine Art (London 1997). Henry Maguire Icons of Their Bodies (Princeton 2000). Thomas F. Mathews Byzantium from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Upper Saddle River 1998). Lyn Rodley Byzantine Art and Architecture (Cambridge 1994). Class Schedule: Jan. 24 Introduction and Roman Imperial Art – the Second Sophistic I Jan. 28 Roman Imperial Art – the Second Sophistic II Recommended reading: Brown 7-95. Jan. 31 Roman Imperial Art – the Second Sophistic III Recommended reading: Elsner 1-51. Feb. 4 Roman Art of the Third Century A.D. I Recommended reading: Elsner 53-87. Feb. 7 Roman Art of the Third Century A.D. II Recommended reading: Elsner 91-143. Feb. 11 Roman Art of the Tetrarchy I Recommended reading: Brown 96-135. Feb. 14 Roman Art of the Tetarchy II Recommended reading: Elsner 145-197. Feb. 18 Constantinian Art I Recommended reading: Elsner 197-235. Feb. 21 Constantinian Art II Recommended reading: Elsner 239-259. Feb. 25 Theodosian Art I Recommended reading: Cormack 1-35.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Maccabees 163 Acacian Schism 127 Acephaloi 146 Adversus Eunomium
    Index 2Maccabees 163 Chrysostom, John 3n14, 4n17, 5n21, 10n54, 153 Acacian schism 127 Church Acephaloi 146 politicisation 126, 127 Adversus Eunomium 71, 108 unity 128, 158 Agathon, archdeacon 154, 155 communicatio idiomatum 168, 177 agon communication, between Greek- and Syriac- centrality of 56 speakers 33 agona 48, 49n11, 56, 59 Constantine i, Pope 155 akribeia 4 Constantine the Great 124, 140 Alexandria 3, 5, 5n20, 9, 11, 32, 65, 160 Constantine v, emperor 156, 157 Anastasius i, emperor 7, 8, 125, 127, 130 Constantinople ii 139 Anastasius ii, emperor 156 Contra Damianum 65 Andrew of Crete 155 Council of Ephesus 142 Anthimos of Constantinople 132, 133, 135 Cyril of Alexandria 1, 2, 4, 5, 5n20, 6–11, 68, Antioch 1, 1n1, 2, 2n4, 2n5, 4–7, 7n35, 8, 8n36, 176, 187 9, 9n49, 11, 14, 22, 65, 128, 160, 170 Antiochene exegesis 11 Damian of Alexandria 65 apatheia 59, 60 De Principiis 175 Aphrahat 56 Diodore of Tarsus 22, 132 Aphrodite 150 Diodorus 176 Arianism 3 Dyophysites 39 Arius 134 Dyophysitism 128 Ark of the Covenant 169 ascetic 5–7 Egypt 1, 128 ascetical 5, 6 Egyptian monasticism 6 asceticism 7, 38, 56, 59, 63 Endemousa 126 imagery of 47, 50, 57 Enkyklion 126 askesis 49, 60 Ephrem 56 ataraxia 60 Ephrem of Amida 134 Athanasius 2, 3, 3n8, 4, 7, 68, 175 Eusebius of Caesarea 14 athletes 51 Eustathius of Antioch 68 athletes 58 Eutyches 104, 108, 113, 129 Eutychius, patriarch 141, 155 Basil the Great 2, 3, 12, 25, 41, 47, 51, 52, 107, 131, 171, 179 fasting 5, 6 Basiliskos 126 Beatitudes 174 Germanus, patriarch 139, 155 Beirut 5, 178 Gregory 41
    [Show full text]